Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
2010
THLN 106
2010 PTD 81
Laws Cited
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)
Sections
36, 36(3)

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, MULTAN

VS

Messrs MEHR DASTGIR LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR, MULTAN

Petitioner(s) by: Amjad Javed and Nadeem Ahsan
Respondent(s) by: Nemo
Present: Maher Muhammad Arif Sargana and Mian Muhammad Hanif Tahir, Members (Judicial)
JUDGMENT

MEHR MUHAMMAD ARIF SARGANA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL).-
This appeal has been directed against Order-in-Appeal No.396 of 2006, dated 31-8-2006, whereby the learned Collector (Appeals), has upheld the Order-in-Original No. 14 of 2006, dated 28-1-2006, passed by the learned Additional Collector (Adjudication); Multan.2. The facts, giving rise to this appeal, are that during the course of audit of the appellant, certain discrepancies were found and based on those discrepancies a show-cause notice was issued proposing recovery of sales tax under section 36(1) along with additional tax under section 34. The adjudication proceedings culminated in passing of Order-in-Original directing the appellant to pay sales tax on different charges. Being aggrieved, the appellant went up in appeal before the learned Collector (Appeals), who vide impugned Order-in-Appeal No.396 of 2006, dated 31-8-2006 and upheld the" Order-in-Original No.14 of 2006, dated 28-1-2006. Hence, this, appeal.3. The main grounds, as ur...