Federal Excise (Case Laws)

Federal Excise (Case Laws)

Court Year Petitioner Law/Section Topic Case Law Citation/Ref. View
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2024 COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER
VS
MESSRS YOUNG TECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS
Finance Act, 2018 10 levy on imported phones

S. 10 [as amended by the Finance Act (XIII of 2022)]---Mobile handset levy on imported phones---Levy on ordinary phones other than smart phones---Legality---Respondents had imported mobile phones and were aggrieved by the imposition of mobile handset levy under Read More...


2024 PTD 306
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2024 Messrs FAF ENTERPRISES, KARACHI
VS
The PRINCIPAL APPRAISER, MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-JIAP, KARACHI and another
Federal Excise (Amendment) Ordinance, 2011 Ss.14(1),14(2) Customs Act, 1969 Ss.80 Penalty for evading Federal Excise Duty

Federal Excise Act 2005---Ss. 14(1) & 14(2)---Customs Act (IV of 1969), S.80---Federal Excise Duty, determination of---Penalty for evading Federal Excise Duty---Customs Authorities, powers of---Scope---Customs Authorities issued show cause notice to importer Read More...


2024 PTD 191
Islamabad High Court 2024 ORACLE SYSTEMS PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED
VS
PAKISTAN, through Secretary Revenue and Ex Officio Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 4 others
Federal Excise Act, 2005 Ss.14 Federal Excise Rules, 2005 Ss.48(6),60(1)(b)(d),70(2) Government dues---Coercive measure

Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)---S.14---Federal Excise Duty Rules, 2005, Rr. 48(6), 60(1)(b)(d) & 70(2), proviso---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 24 & 199---Constitutional petition---Government dues---Coercive measure---Notice of recovery, non-issuance Read More...


2024 PTD 105
129 TAX 51
Lahore High Court 2024 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LYALPUR ZONE, FAISALABAD
VS
Messrs M.M. ENTERPRISES (MUNIR AHMAD), FAISALABAD
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.113,133(1) Withholding tax

Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 113, 133 (1) & Second Sched., Part-IV, Cl. 45A---Notification SRO No. 333(I)/2011, dated 02-05-2011---Reference---Withholding tax---Deductions---Whether the Appellate Tribunal had not erred in law by vacating orders Read More...


2024 PTD 99
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2024 The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD: In the matter of
VS
nemo
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Section: 2(3)(i)(a),2(3)(i)(b), 2(3)(i)(c),2(3)(ii),9,10 Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990 Section: 13,Sixth Schedule, Imports by Diplomats

Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)---Ss. 2(3)(i)(a), 2(3)(i)(b), 2(3)(i)(c), 2(3)(ii), 9 & 10---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S. 13 & Sixth Sched. Serial No.46 (as omitted through Finance (Supplementary) Act, Read More...


2024 PTD 86
Sindh High Court 2024 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, GUJRANWALA
VS
MUHAMMAD KHALID CHAUDHRY
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.33(1),214A,214D Interpretation of statutes---Saving clause

Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss.133(1), 214A & 214D [as amended by Finance Act (XXX of 2018)]---Reference---Selection for audit---Amendment in law---Order selecting case of respondent / taxpayer for audit was set aside by Appellate Tribunal Inland Read More...


2024 PTD 80
2024 PTCL 48
Sindh High Court 2024 SHAKEEL AHMED KASANA and others
VS
FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN through Registrar Federal Tax Ombudsman and others
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Ss. 10 &17 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 Inspection of office of Inland Revenue

Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)-----Ss. 10 &17---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Federal Tax Ombudsman---Inspection of office of Inland Revenue---Jurisdiction---Scope---Petitioners were Read More...


2024 PTD 1
(2024) 129 TAX 224
Islamabad High Court 2023 JS BANK LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED/ATTORNEY AND OTHERS
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN FEDERAL BOARD REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 19(6) & 21 Constitution, Art. 199 Criminal proceedings

Show-cause notice without jurisdiction-Criminal proceedings, initiating of---Pre-conditions--Petitioners were aggrieved of proceedings initiated by authorities on the allegation of obstructing tax recovery process--- Plea raised by Read More...


2023 PTD 704
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2023 FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS
DEWAN SALMAN FIBER LTD. AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S. 3. Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992), S. 6. SRO 531(I)/88 dated 26.06.1988. (‘SRO 531/88’). SRO 555(I)/79 dated 28.06.1979. (‘SRO 555/79’). SRO 500(I)/93 dated 14.06.1993. (‘SRO 500/93’). SRO Nos. 545(1)194 and 546(1)194, both dated 09.06.1994. (‘SRO 545/94’ and ‘SRO 546/94’ respec Exemption from excise duty

Manufacturer of polyester staple fiber (PSF) in North-West Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)— Exemption from excise duty on raw materials mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and pure terephthalic acid (PTA)—Removal of—Legality— Whether SRO Read More...


2023 PTD 1635
(2023) 128 TAX 435
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2023 THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD: IN THE MATTER OF
VS
Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Ss. 2(3)(i)(a)(b),2(3)(ii),9,10 Jurisdiction assignments

Pending cases of taxpayers, non-assigning of—Maladministration—Scope—Federal Tax Ombudsman took Own Motion against FBR Authorities to provide relief to the taxpayers because more than 65000 cases were unassigned, lying in CTO portal, in wake of Read More...


2023 PTD 1614
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2023 MUHAMMAD KHALID
VS
THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000, Ss. 2(3), 9 & 10 Sales Tax Act 1990, Ss. 11, 45-B & 73. Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2002, Rr. 7 & 37 Refund of tax to commercial exporter

Maladministration— Scope—Refund of tax to commercial exporter on zero rated supplies— Authorities proceeded against the importer alleging him of using fake/flying invoices while taxpayer/ importer trying to satisfy the authorities—Complaint Read More...


2023 PTD 1594
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS PAKISTAN FRUIT JUICE CO. (PVT.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CTO, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act, 2005 7 Value determinition for the purposes of duty/ notional value

Retail price---Scope---Appellant was held liable to include the notional value of Federal Excise Duty in retail price for the purpose of calculating sales tax on the ground that the excise duty was to be factored in while computing the Read More...


2023 PTD 817
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS PAKISTAN FRUIT JUICE CO. (PVT.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CTO, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act, 2005 7 grant of an extension of time

Recovery of tax- Show cause notice--Adjudication proceedings---Order-in-original--- Limitation--Scope---Commissioner, under subsection (5) of S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and subsection (2) of S. 14 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, Read More...


2023 PTD 817
Lahore High Court 2023 SERVICE GLOBAL FOOTWEAR LIMITED and another
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss.2(3), 9(2) 10 Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3(2) [as amended vide Finance Act, 2019] Customs Act (IV of 1969), Ss. 25 25-A Customs General Order No. 12 of 2019 dated 30-02-2019-- Goods were made chargeable to sales tax

Maladministration--Scope--Certain goods were made chargeable to sales tax on the basis of retail price at the time of import by virtue of amendments made in S.3(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990--Federal Tax Ombudsman took Own Motion to check development and Read More...


2023 PTD 1120
(2023) 128 TAX 90
2023 PLD 471
2023 SLD 1922
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI
VS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) coram non judice

No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More...


2021 PTD 51
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2021 MESSRS UNITED INDUSTRIES LTD. LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE. LTU, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act 2005 S.7 & 44 Sales Tax Act 1990 S.66 Refund of excise duty to be claimed within one year

Appellant paid Federal Excise Duty on its supplies of locally purchased raw material for production of cooking oil under S.7 of Federal Excise Act, 2005, under sales tax mode---Appellant claimed refund of excise duty but the refund of the appellant was considered as Read More...


2021 PTD 150
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS SAMSOL INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS
Federal Excise Act, 2005 34A findings of facts

Where order of Appellate Tribunal was based on findings of facts, after detailed discussion, deliberation and interpretation of provisions of law and as such did not carry any mistake apparent on record, then same did not require any interference by High Court while Read More...


2021 PTD 155
(2021) 124 TAX 540
Sindh High Court 2021 M/S ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND 5 OTHERS
VS
THE ASSISTANT COLLECTOR (P&A) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act, 2005 S.41 & 14 Civil Procedure Code 1908 S.9 Specific Relief Act 1877 S.42 & 12 Show cause without lawful authority

Suit filed in the (Sindh) High Court in its original civil jurisdiction against an Order, Notification relating to a taxing statute-Bar to jurisdiction of "civil courts" under ouster clause in S.41 of Federal Excise Act, 2005-Implied bar Read More...


2021 PTD 281
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS AL-KHAIR GADOON LTD.
VS
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S: 4(1)(2), 35 Law: Central Excise Rules, 1944 S: R. 7, 9, 210, 223(6), 294 Procedural laws & Rules

Olas Khan v. Chairman NAB (PLD 2018 SC 40) In this case, while commenting on the erroneous assumption of jurisdiction by the High Court in a matter of bail, it was observed that: "it is now settled position in law that merely citing or Read More...


2020 PTD 18
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS AL-KHAIR GADOON LTD.
VS
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S: 4(1)(2), 35 Law: Central Excise Rules, 1944 S: R. 7, 9, 210, 223(6), 294 Show cause notice & incorrect provision of law

Incorrect provision of law mentioned in the notice---Effect- --Quoting of wrong provisions of law in a show cause notice would not necessarily vitiate the entire process initiated thereunder---In deciding the legal validity of the show Read More...


2020 PTD 18
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 M/s. Shah Sons Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.
VS
The Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad
Establishment Of Office Of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 9(2)(A), 2(3) & 10 application for revision in sales tax return

Record showed that application of complainant for revision in sales tax return was pending for three months and no action was taken by Dept. despite follow-up reminders---Delay in disposal of complainant's application was evident, which Read More...


2020 PTD 1029
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2019 SAJJAD AHMED
VS
The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 2(3)(b)(ii), 9(2)(b), 10(1)(4 Refund of tax amount/ delay in

Refund of tax amount, delay in-Taxpayer was aggrieved of delay in process of his tax refund- Indeed--Objections raised under S.9(2)(b) of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was misconceived as taxpayer had already availed legal remedy Read More...


2019 PTD 1198
Lahore High Court 2019 M/S. SHAHZADI POLYPROPYLENE INDUSTRIES THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 4 OTHERS
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)Ss . 9 & 32 Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 170 & 120---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972) S.3 & proviso Income tax refund

Complaint against non-issuance of income tax refund---Jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman in relation to cases of tax refund---Intra-court appeal---Maintainability---Petitioner’s complaint before the Federal Tax Ombudsman regarding non-issuance of income tax Read More...


2017 PTD 2019
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. SECURITY LEASING CORPORATION LIMITED, KARACHI
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 14(1). Federal Excise Rules, 2005, Rr.40-A(4) & 45. S.R.O. No. 475(I)/ 2009, dated 13-6-2009 Leasing activities/Levy of federal excise duty

Appellant/taxpayer was engaged in the business of leasing----Tax Officer, held appellant liable to federal excise duty under Third Sched., Table II, Item 8 of Federal Excise Act, 2005 for the period 2007 to 2011 and levied federal excise duty Read More...


2018 PTD 1391
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
M/S. WITRIBE, ISLAMABAD
Federal Excise Act, 2005 S. 3, 16, 34A & Sched

Telecommunication services---Internet services---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether an internet service provider was liable to pay federal excise duty which was imposed with regard to voice / telephonic content of internet Read More...


2018 PTD 1413
2020 PTCL 582
Peshawar High Court 2018 CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE
VS
M/S CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LTD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE & 2 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Amendment

Any amendment introduced in law has prospective effect, unless the amendment expressly provides for it to have retrospective Read More...


2018 PTD 1617
(2018)118 TAX 339
2018 PTCL 325
Peshawar High Court 2018 CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE
VS
M/S CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LTD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE & 2 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 46(5) [as inserted by Finance Act 2015] Central Excise Act 1944 S.3-D Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 S. 9(2) & 32 Constitutional of Pakistan, Art. 199 Constitutional petition/Locus standi/Excise duty, refund of

Retrospective effect of amendment in the statue (Federal Excise Act, 2005)---Scope---Dispute was with regard to refund of Excise Duty paid by respondent companies---Federal Tax Ombudsman directed respondent companies to get audit conducted Read More...


2018 PTD 1617
(2018)118 TAX 339
2018 PTCL 325
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2017 FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
VS
M/S. SAHIB JEE AND OTHERS
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 11 & 32 Reference to the President

Reference to the President against recommendation of Ombudsman---Scope---When the Revenue Division or any person was aggrieved of a recommendation made by the Federal Tax Ombudsman in terms of S.11 of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Read More...


2017 PTD 1481
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2017 FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
VS
M/S. SAHIB JEE AND OTHERS
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 14(8) Reference to the President

Federal Tax Ombudsman---Review, power of---Scope---Section 14(8) of the Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 empowered the Ombudsman to review any finding communicated or recommendation made or any order passed by him---Said power of Read More...


2017 PTD 1481
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2017 M/S. BANK ISLAMI PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI
VS
The C.I.R., AUDIT UNIT-4 ZONE-II, LTU, KARACHI
Federal Excise Act 2005 Ss. 36 & 37 Stay order

Recovery of tax---Application for stay order---Scope---Rectification of stay order---Scope---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue could not rectify stay order under S.36, Federal Excise Act, 2005 Matter of stay being purely discretionary in nature---Where the taxpayer Read More...


2017 PTD 1517
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2017 M/S. BANK ISLAMI PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI
VS
The C.I.R., AUDIT UNIT-4 ZONE-II, LTU, KARACHI
Federal Excise Act 2005 Ss. 36 & 37 Stay of recovery; injunction

“Stay of recovery of tax” and “injunction”---Distinction---Appeal and rectification proceedings---Procedure---Appellate powers of the Tribunal---Scope---“Order of stay” would take effect immediately on being passed, even of it was not brought/served to Read More...


2017 PTD 1517
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2017 M/S. SHAHEEN CLOTH PROCESSING MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 9(2)(a), 2(3) & 10 Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 47, 66 & 67 Sales tax refund

Complaint against non-issuance of sales tax refund---Jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Maladministration---Scope---Matter sub judice before High Court---Effect---Contention of the Department was that per S.9(2)(a) of the Establishment of Office of Federal Read More...


2017 PTD 1556
Sindh High Court 2017 PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes

(k) Federal Excise of 2005---

---S.3, First Schedule, Table II---Central Excise Act (I of 1944), S.3---Sindh Sales Tax Act (XII of 2011), S.3---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199, 270AA (7), Fourth Schedule, Federal List, entries Nos. 44, 49 Read More...


2017 PTD 1
Lahore High Court 2017 MUHAMMAD ANWAR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT AND 2 OTHERS
Establishment of the Officer of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 S. 32 Representation to the president of Pakistan

Representation to the President of Pakistan--- Limitation 30 days to file representation to the President under S.32 of the Establishment of the Officer of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000---Valid grounds for condonation of delay---Scope---Representation filed Read More...


2017 PTD 2011
Islamabad High Court 2017 M/S. TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005) -Ss. 7, 3 & Sched. Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 270AA, 142, 199 & Forth Sched.--Federal Excise Rules, 2005, R. 43---S.R.O. No. 550(I)/ 2006 dated 05.06.2006 Telecommunication services

Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 270AA, 142, 199 & Forth Sched.---Federal Excise Rules, 2005, R. 43---S.R.O. No. 550(I)/ 2006 dated 05.06.2006---Declaration and continuances of laws after the Eighteenth Constitutional Amendment with regard to collection of levy / Read More...


2017 PTD 2269
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2017 MESSRS PIONEER CABLES LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 2(3), 9 & 10 Customs Act 1969 Ss. 33 & 18 Refund of Customs Duty

Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Maladministration---Scope---Complaint against delay in refund of Customs Duty and imposition of additional Customs Duty---Contention of Department was that delay in refund was on account of Read More...


2017 PTD 2485
Lahore High Court 2016 Urban Developers Associates
VS
Commissioner Inland Revenue, etc.
Federal Excise Act, 2005 9, Intendment or presumption on interpretation of law/ Payment of duty

Payment of duty---Liability---Intendment or presumption on interpretation of law---Scope---Bank account of petitioner was attached on the basis of alleged tax demand raised by authorities---Validity---Person sought to be taxed could only be taxed when he come within Read More...


2016 PTD 2242
Lahore High Court 2016 Urban Developers Associates
VS
Commissioner Inland Revenue, etc.
Interpretation of statutes - Fiscal statute

Two interpretations---Charging section of a fiscal statue is key and pivotal provision, which imposes a fiscal liability upon a taxpayer/person thus it should be strictly construed and applied, so far the revenue is concerned---Where a provision is susceptible to Read More...


2016 PTD 2242
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2016 DIRECTOR GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
VS
MASTER TILES AND CERAMIC INDUSTRIES LTD. G.T. ROAD GUJRANWALA and 3 others
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 14(8), 13 & 9 Review of findings of Federal Tax Ombudsman

Review of findings of Federal Tax Ombudsman---Scope---Department, by way of review of impugned order, sought expunction of remarks made by the Federal Tax Ombudsman in the impugned order, on the ground that the said remarks were contradictory, as the Federal Tax Read More...


2016 PTD 1443
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2016 DIRECTOR GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
VS
MASTER TILES AND CERAMIC INDUSTRIES LTD. G.T. ROAD GUJRANWALA and 3 others
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 14(8) Scope of review of findings of Federal Tax Ombudsman

Scope of review of findings of Federal Tax Ombudsman under S.14 of the Establishment of the Officer Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000---Concreted effort to re-argue the entire case and introduction of new issues which were not raised in the original complaint, Read More...


2016 PTD 1443
Islamabad High Court 2016 PETITIONER(S): PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VS
RESPONDENT(S): FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005) 46 Audit /Powers of Commissioner and FBR

Audit---Powers of Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue---Giving of advance notice---Purpose, object and scope---Board as well as Commissioner are empowered to conduct audit of the record and documents of any person registered under Federal Excise Act, 2005, Read More...


2016 PTD 1484
(2017)115 TAX 27
2016 PTCL 302
Lahore High Court 2016 Messrs KASHMIR SUGAR MILLS LTD.
VS
FEDERATION through Secretary Revenue and others
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005) 3 & 42 Recovery of federal excise duty

Recovery of federal excise duty---Show cause notice---Interpretation of any provision by Federal Board of Revenue---Scope---Petitioner was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by adjudicating authority and consequential orders-in-original passed as consequence of Read More...


2016 PTD 1649
Lahore High Court 2016 PUNJAB BEVERAGES CO. (PVT.) LTD. through General Manager Finance
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and others
Interpretation of statutes Statute; Administrative instructions

“Statute” and “administrative instructions”---Conflict---Scope---In case of conflict between a statute and instructions of Department, instructions/orders of the department are to be ignored and statute law has to be Read More...


2016 PTD 1736
Lahore High Court 2016 PUNJAB BEVERAGES CO. (PVT.) LTD. through General Manager Finance
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and others
Interpretation of statutes Statute; Administrative instructions

“Statute” and “administrative instructions”---Conflict---Scope---In case of conflict between a statute and instructions of Department, instructions/orders of the department are to be ignored and statute law has to be Read More...


2016 PTD 1736
Lahore High Court 2016 PUNJAB BEVERAGES CO. (PVT.) LTD. through General Manager Finance
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and others
Federal Excise Act, 2005--- ---Federal Excise Rules, 2005 2(12a)---. R.43-A(I)---S.R.O.No.561(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 Franchise services

Franchise services---Proof---Federal Excise Duty, recovery of---Show cause notice---Alternate remedy---Petitioner company assailed show cause notice issued for recovery of Federal Excise Duty on the ground of franchiser and franchisee relationship---Plea raised by Read More...


2016 PTD 1736
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2016 GARDEN TOWN, PHASE-II, GUJRANWALA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA
Federal Excise Act, 2005 4, 8, 14, 19(1) Failure to file monthly returns

Liability to pay Federal Excise Duty---Limitation---Failure to file monthly returns---Registered person, engaged in the business of property development and construction of residential/commercial units, was under legal obligation to file monthly Read More...


2016 PTD 2362
Islamabad High Court 2016 Messrs PAKTEL LTD., ISLAMABAD
VS
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX , RAWALPINDI
Central Excise Act, (I of 1944) 3,36-C,First Schedule Central excise duty, recovery of

Central excise duty, recovery of---“Telephone”---Definition---Scope---Mobile telephone---Appellant was a company engaged in business of cellular phones and was aggrieved of show cause notice raising demand of recovery of central excise duty---Validity---Mobile Read More...


2016 PTD 1754
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2015 DEPUTY DIRECTORCOLLECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR
VS
FARMAN ALI and others
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) Ss. 9-A & 13---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3) Complaint under S. 200, Cr.P.C.

Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider; whether complaint mentioned in S. 9-A(6) of Central Excise Act, 1994, by which Special Judge, could take cognizance, was to be equated with “complaint” under S. 200, Cr.P.C. and thus procedure thereunder Read More...


2015 PTD 1457
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2015 DEPUTY DIRECTORCOLLECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR
VS
FARMAN ALI and others
Central Excise Act, (I of 1944) --S. 13 Inquiry into offence

Inquiry into offence---Procedure---Comprehensive procedure had been provided under S. 13 of Central Excise Act, 1944, for inquiry into an offence committed under Central Excise Act, 1944, right up to filing of complaint before Special Read More...


2015 PTD 1457
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2015 DEPUTY DIRECTORCOLLECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR
VS
FARMAN ALI and others
Central Excise Act (I of 1944)--- ----S. 13 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 154 Arrest and detention

Arrest and detention---Non-registration of FIR---Effect---Absence of FIR does not, in any way, take away or affect powers of Central Excise Officer to arrest an accused under Central Excise Act, 1944, to carry out inquiry into an offence and to file complaint before Read More...


2015 PTD 1457
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2015 DEPUTY DIRECTORCOLLECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR
VS
FARMAN ALI and others
Central Excise Act (I of 1944)--- ----S. 13 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 173 & 200 Arrest and detention

Complaint to Special Judge---Format---Nature of complaint to be filed by Central Excise Officer to Special Judge for trial of accused, has been equated with police report submitted by officer in charge of police station under S. 173, Cr.P.C.---Such complaint is not Read More...


2015 PTD 1457
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2015 DEPUTY DIRECTORCOLLECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR
VS
FARMAN ALI and others
Central Excise Act (I of 1944)--- ----S. 9-A & 13 Arrest and detention

Arrest and detention---Inquiry into offence---Scope---Case registered against accused under Central Excise Act, 1944, was declared without lawful authority by High Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction---Validity---Initiation of criminal proceedings, Read More...


2015 PTD 1457
Lahore High Court 2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXWEALTH TAX
VS
Mst. Asma Jilani and Others
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) S. 2(1)(5)(ii) Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S. 17 Association of persons; Transfer of property; Arbitration award/agreement

Association of persons (AOP)---Transfer of property---Arbitration award/agreement---Authorities did not accept arbitration award/agreement of the plea that the same had not conferred any ownership right on individuals/shareholders, unless the deed was registered Read More...


2015 PTD 2236
(2015) 112 TAX 22
Sindh High Court 2015 RISHAD CHOUDRI and others
VS
CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI through Chief Executive and others
Cantonments Act (II of 1924)--- ----Ss. 77, 99(2)(b) & 259---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 Trust property being used for charitable activities

Property tax in case of building---Exemption---Scope---Constitutional petition---Trust property being used for charitable activities---Remission of property tax and conservancy tax on such property granted by Cantonment Board from 1-7-1987 to 30-6-2004---Withdrawal Read More...


2014 PTD 136
2014 PLD 1
Sindh High Court 2015 RISHAD CHOUDRI and others
VS
CANTONMENT BOARD, KARACHI through Chief Executive and others
Cantonments Act (II of 1924)--- ----Ss. 77, 99(2)(b) & 259---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 Important question of law

Constitutional petition based on important question of law of public importance---Maintainability---Such question could be raised directly before High Court and constitutional petition was maintainable in Read More...


2014 PTD 136
2014 PLD 1
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 INAMULLAH
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, Islamabad court
Establishment of Officer of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Ss. 2(3), 9(2)(a) & 10(1)(4) Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XX Seizure and confiscation of smuggled goods

Seizure and confiscation of smuggled goods---Maladministration---Allegedly smuggled goods were seized along with the truck carrying those goods by Anti-Smuggling Organization---Adjudicatory Authority, confiscated said goods and penalty of Rs.100,000 was also imposed Read More...


2015 PTD 2279
(2015) 113 TAX 30
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 Messrs DESCON OXYCHEM LTD., LAHORE
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, (XXXV of 2000)--- Ss. 2(3) & 10--- Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss. 10 & 67---Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 26A(7) Sales tax refunds

Complaint against non-issuance of sales tax refunds and delay in issuance of sales tax refunds---Maladministration---Additional payment (compensation) for delay in payment of refund claims---Contention of taxpayer inter alia was that Department was deliberately Read More...


2015 PTD 2331
Lahore High Court 2015 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
M/S ISLAM STEEL MILLS
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 161, 160 & 153 Obligation of Department and taxpayers

Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Obligation of Department and taxpayers---Taxpayers were served with show-cause notice under S.161 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for failure to pay tax deducted as withholding agents---Contention of tax payers was that Read More...


2015 PTD 2335
(2015)111 TAX 272
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 Messrs NIAZI CNG COMPANY
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)--- ----Ss. 2(3) & 10--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 127 & 170 complainant

Complaint against non-issuance of income tax refund---Jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Scope---Contention of Department was that the complainant ought to have filed appeal before the first statutory Appellate forum and there was no cause for him to file Read More...


2015 PTD 2348
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 Messrs NIAZI CNG COMPANY
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) -Ss. 2(3) & 10---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) ----Ss. 2(3) & 10--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 234A, 235, & 147--- Income tax refund

Non-issuance of income tax refund claim in relation to advance tax paid under S. 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on electricity bills by the complainant, which was CNG station---Validity---Tax deducted under S. 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was Read More...


2015 PTD 2348
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 ALI MANSOOR KHAN
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Ss. 2(3) & 10(1) Jurisdiction of FTO

Jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Scope---Maladministration--- Fraudulently prepared document---Complaint against unauthorized CNIC access and unilateral issuance of NTN and subsequent amendment therein by the Department---Contention of complainant was Read More...


2015 PTD 2401
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 Ch. SHAHID MEHMOOD
VS
SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) S. 10 Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, S.114(6)--- Filing of revised income tax revised returns

Filing of revised income tax revised income tax returns---Obtaining written permission of Commissioner for filing revised income tax returns---Income tax refund---Complaint of maladministration on part of Income Tax Authorities for non-issuance of income tax Read More...


2015 PTD 2443
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2015 MUHAMMAD ASLAM
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)--- ----Ss. 2(3) & 10--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 170(4), 171 & 120 refund

Non-issuance of tax refund---Maladministration---Scope---Contention of complainant/taxpayer was that despite completing all legal procedures and requirements, Department had failed to issue refund---Contention of Department was that the said claim of refund was Read More...


2015 PTD 2558
(2016)113 TAX 27
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2014 Messrs S.R. ENTERPRISES
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Federal Ombudsman Institutional Reforms Act (XIV of 2013) Ss. 18 & 28 Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.9(1) maladministration was a predominant feature

Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Federal Tax Ombudsman holds “concurrent jurisdiction without restraint” in all cases involving maladministration by Federal Board of Revenue functionaries---Taxpayer had the option to go either Read More...


2014 PTD 104
Sindh High Court 2014 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, LARGE TAXPAYER, KARACHI
VS
MESSRS FARAN SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)--- ----S. 34-A Jurisdiction of High Court

---Reference to High Court---Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 34A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005---Scope---While exercising jurisdiction under S. 34A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 only such questions could be answered by the High Court which were questions of Read More...


2014 PTD 999
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2014
VS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944)------S. 33(3)--- Central Excise Rules 1944, Rr. 10 & 226(2)---S.R.O. 499(I)/93 dated 14-6-1993 Power of adjudication---Limitation

---Power of adjudication---Limitation---Show-Cause Notice was issued on 5-7-2001---As per provision of S.33(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as relevant, on the date the order was mandated to be finalized within 45 days of the issuance of Show-Cause Notice within Read More...


2014 PTD 1034
Sindh High Court 2014 Messrs CITIBANK NA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and another
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)--- ----Ss. 2(16a)(23), 3, 16(1) & First Sched. Table-II, Entry No.8--- Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Sched. Heading No. 98.13 transactions of insurance commission

Services provided by Financial Institutions i.e. transactions of insurance commission---Liability to pay excise duty on such transaction for period from January to June 2007---Validity---Services specified only in First Sched. of Federal Excise Act, 2005 would be Read More...


2014 PTD 284
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2014
VS
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 254--- Central Excise Act (1 of 1944) S.33(3) Act, Failure to comply with requirement

---Central Excise Act (1 of 1944) S.33(3)---Failure to comply with requirement as to time does not render an act invalid---Scope---Article 254 of the Constitution of Pakistan only relates to “any act or things required by Constitution to be done within a Read More...


2014 PTD 1034
Sindh High Court 2014 Messrs CITIBANK NA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and another
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)--- ----Ss. 2(16a)(23), 3, 16(1) & First Sched. Table-II, Entry No. 8--- Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Sched. Heading No. 98.13 Services provided by Bank

Services provided by Bank i.e. merchant discounts on use of credit-card by its holder---Liability to pay excise duty on such services for period from January to June 2007---Validity---Services only specified in First Sched. of Federal Excise Act, 2005 would be Read More...


2014 PTD 284
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2014
VS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944)-- ---S.33(3) Failure to comply with requirement as to time does not render an act invalid

--Cement factory---Contravention report of short production---Effect---Audit was conducted of 13 quarters and chose five quarters to work out contravention of alleged evasion of short production of Clinker---Senior Intelligence Officer (SIO) had made elementary Read More...


2014 PTD 1034
Sindh High Court 2014 Messrs CITIBANK NA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and another
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)--- ----Ss. 2(16a)(23), 3, 16(1) & First Sched. Table-II, Entry No. 8 Services provided by Bank

Services provided by Bank i.e. merchant discounts on use of credit-card by its holder---Liability to pay excise duty on such services foe period from July, 2007 to December, 2008---Validity---Service No.11 listed in Entry 8 of First Sched. of Federal Excise Act, Read More...


2014 PTD 284
Sindh High Court 2014 Messrs CITIBANK NA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and another
Interpretation of statutes Two reasonable interpretations

Fiscal statutes---Charging provision would be applied as same stood, and there would be no intendment or equity regarding thereto.

Fiscal statutes---Two reasonable interpretations of a provision being possible---Effect---Interpretation favouring taxpayer would Read More...


2014 PTD 284
Sindh High Court 2014 Messrs CITIBANK NA
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and another
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)--- ----Ss. 2(16a)(23), 3, 16(1) & First Sched. Table-II, Entry No.8---State Bank of Pakistan Circular Letter No.21/EPP-1(96) Poly-2000 dated 28-7-2000 Services provided by Bank

Services provided by Bank in respect of speedy cash home remittances received in Pakistan from abroad---Liability of Bank to pay excise duty on such services---Validity---Bank for such remittances had not charged anything from remitters, but had received amount Read More...


2014 PTD 284
Sindh High Court 2013 Syed NUSRAT NASIR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Ss: 2(1),3(2),9,9(1), 9(2), 10,13, 14, & 32 10,9 Aggrieved person | release of a vehicle

Constitutional petition---Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Complaint against maladministration---Aggrieved person---Scope---Petitioner while performing his duties as Additional Collector (Preventive) Customs made order for release of Read More...


2013 PTD 486
108 TAX 414
Sindh High Court 2013 Syed NUSRAT NASIR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Interpretation of Statute Public Functionaries/ jurisdiction

--Authorities performing functions under any statute were required to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law by remaining within the domain and jurisdiction as vested in them under the Read More...


2013 PTD 486
108 TAX 414
Sindh High Court 2013 Syed NUSRAT NASIR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Interpretation of statutes 10,9 law was required

----Every law was required to be administrated in such a manner that it may foster the purpose of such legislation and shall not, in any manner, frustrate the Read More...


2013 PTD 486
108 TAX 414
Sindh High Court 2013 Syed NUSRAT NASIR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Interpretation of statutes law was required

Every law was required to be administrated in such a manner that it may foster the purpose of such legislation and shall not, in any manner, frustrate the Read More...


2013 PTD 486
108 TAX 414
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD.
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) First Sched, Item No. 04.03 Pigment/ chemical/ manufacture of pigments

Red lead/ Litharge—Pigment or chemical—Litharge by itself was a pigment but a chemical that was used in the manufacture of pigments/  Red lead in view of its high toxicity was a dying pigment and was seldom used. 

First Sched, Item Read More...


2001 PTD 1799
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2001 COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE AND OTHERS
VS
MESSRS RIAZ BOTTLERS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S.4(2) Retail Price

Constitution Read More...


2001 PTD 1854
2004 PTCL 298
Supreme Court of India 2001 PAPER PRODUCTS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Indian Central Excise Act, 1944 S. 37B Circular are binding on Department

Circular/ Effect—Circular are binding on Department/ Correctness of circulars cannot be challenged by Department even on the ground of their being inconsistent with statutory provision/ Indian Central Excise Act, 1944, S.37B.

Apart from the fact that Read More...


2001 PTD 2253
247 ITR 128