Court | Year | Petitioner | Law/Section | Topic | Case Law | Citation/Ref. | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, WITHHOLDING TAX ZONE, RTO, MULTAN Vs MESSRS SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.161 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4) | withholding tax/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted. |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted----payment for goods, services and contracts----Scope----Case against taxpayer related to non-deduction/non-payment of withholding tax which surfaced violation of the provisions of Ss.153 & 161 of the ITO Read More... |
2023 PTD 524 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS Vs THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | collecting agent/ advance tax |
Constitutional matter, decision of---Principle---Cardinal principle while exercising Constitutional jurisdiction is that courts should abstain from deciding a Constitutional question, if a case could be decided on other or narrower Read More... |
2023 PTD 527 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS Vs THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | Headings/Object, purpose and scope |
Headings---Object, purpose and scope----Headings do not control meaning and do not define its scope---Headings may assist in interpretation of a section, if words appear to be doubtful, however, they cannot restrict plain words of the Read More... |
2023 PTD 527 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 147(7), 147(8), 161, 161(1B), 162, 162(2), 174(3) | Tax due-Recovery /tax liability / paid/discharged |
Constitutional petition-Tax due-Recovery--- Reconciliation--- Dispute was with regard to notice of recovery of tax due issued under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Rational in S. 161 (1B) of ITO 2001, was that a tax liable to be Read More... |
2023 PTD 541 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS SOHAIL STEEL GL SHEET COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148, 159 | Exemption/ raw material imported |
Sales tax at import stage-Exemption from income tax-Petitioners were running their manufacturing units in erstwhile Provincially Administered Tribal Areas, who sought tax exemption over raw material imported by them---Clause No. 146 of Read More... |
2023 PTD 556 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131 | annulled |
Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal---Stay of proceedings--- Scope-Appellant/assessee sought stay of proceedings in consequence of an order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals)--- --Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had annulled the order of the Read More... |
2023 PTD 567 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs MESSRS ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, ISLAMABAD (IESCO) |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 161, 174 | production of tax records/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted |
Tax demand-Record, maintenance of--Limitation- Failure to pay tax collected or deducted-Authorities issued notice for recovery of tax for the period beyond six years---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside the demand created by tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 569 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD and others Vs HAMEEDA BEGUM and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 136 | Assessment---Oral gift |
Assessment---Oral gift-Non-registration of gift declaration--Authorities were aggrieved of accepting unregistered oral gift of immovable property held by assessee---Gift deed executed under Transfer of Property Act, 1882, was required to be registered compulsorily Read More... |
2023 PTD 603 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Super tax/ vires of--charging section |
Super tax, vires of--Charging section-Retrospective effect Property rights-Petitioners / taxpayers sought striking down of S.4B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, on the plea that charging section could not be retrospective in Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Interpretation of statutes/ Amendment/ Inconsistency/ Taxing statute |
Amendment-Inconsistency--Scope-Law accepts that amendment becomes a part of original statute and both ought to be construed together-In case of any inconsistency, harmonization may be employed so as to impede an irreconcilable Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Discrimination-Reasonable classification |
Discrimination-Reasonable classification, principle of Scope-Provision of Art. 25 of the Constitution envisages equality between citizens, however it allows for differential treatment of persons not similarly placed under a reasonable Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 | Audit/ Selection of case for audit |
Selection of case for audit-Word reasons - Scope--Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of letter and notices issued by authorities selecting its case for audit----Word reason connotes an expression giving justification for an action, a ground to explain something, a Read More... |
2023 PTD 649 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 | release of vehicle/ forensic report |
Reference---Redemption fine---Release of vehicle-- Tampered chasis number---Authorities were aggrieved of release of vehicle which was confiscated for smuggling of petrol---Customs Appellate Tribunal released the vehicle on deposit of 20% redemption fine---Vehicle Read More... |
2023 PTD 649 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.18, 79(1)(e), 122(4) (5A), 133 & 166(1)(a) | housing scheme |
Tax exemption-Adventure in nature of trade---Scope---Taxpayer was an industrial unit and sold its land by converting it into a housing scheme and earned profit----For an adventure in nature of trade there had to be "indicia of trade" Read More... |
2023 PTD 689 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
Vs M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | advance tax |
Scope-Purpose of advance tax is collection of tax in advance and its adjustment at later stage but not charging or levy of tax-For collection of advance tax, certain persons are obliged, by the Statute, to collect and deposit the same in Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
Vs M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | imposition and recovery default surcharge |
Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Scope-Provisions of S.162(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 regarding imposition and recovery of default surcharge etc. are only attracted where failure to deduct tax is Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
Vs M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | Annual statement of tax collected or deducted |
Advance tax-Annual statement of tax collected or deducted-Scope--Practice of calling reconciliation, in absence of any statement, is against the spirit of R.44 of the Income Tax Rules, 2002-Rule 44 envisages, unequivocally, that Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
Vs M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | Show-cause notice/Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice |
Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Show-cause notice, issuance of---Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice under Ss. 161 & 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA
Vs MESSRS CRYSTAL DISTRIBUTORS, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(d), 122(1), 128(5), 129, 129(1)(a), 132, 132(3)(c), 133, 133(5) | Remanding of the matter |
Reference--Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue---Powers---Remanding of the matter---Object, purpose and scope-Taxpayer assailed assessment order and Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) remanded the matter to Assessing Officer for de novo Read More... |
2023 PTD 758 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
Vs PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) | Penalty for concealment of income |
Assessment on production of accounts, evidence, etc. Penalty for concealment of income---Scope---During the assessment proceedings, the taxation officer alleged that certain expenses claimed by the respondent were false and inaccurate Read More... |
2023 PTD 773 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
Vs PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) | Penalty for concealment of income |
Penalty for concealment of income--Scope----Mens rea-----Scope----Existence of mens rea is a mandatory condition for levying any penalty under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Burden to prove such act of an assessee is also on Read More... |
2023 PTD 773 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
Vs MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 | Rectification/ incorrect assessment |
Assessment giving effect to an order---Rectification of mistakes--Scope---According to S.124 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the assessing officer must adhere to the directions given in the appeal effect order and cannot make any Read More... |
2023 PTD 789 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
Vs MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistakes-Scope of rectification is limited to correcting mistakes that are easily identifiable on the surface of the order. |
2023 PTD 789 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney Vs COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) | International tax conventions, agreements or treaties |
International tax conventions, agreements or treaties-----Interpretation----Reasons as to why treaty interpretation rules differ from domestic tax rules stated. International tax conventions or Read More... |
2023 PTD 863 2023 PTCL 722 2023 SCMR 1055 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney---Petitioner Vs COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others--- |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) | Conventions/ Exemption/ permanent establishment |
Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income ("Convention"), Arts. 5 & Read More... |
2023 PTD 863 2023 PTCL 722 2023 SCMR 1055 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
FAIRDEAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR OF COMPANY Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 20, 122(9), 171(1), 177(7), 214C | Audit Selection Regime |
Constitutional petition-Audit Selection Regime--Petitioners / taxpayers were aggrieved of selection of their cases for Audit----Selection for audit under S. 177(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, by Commissioner Inland Revenue was not Read More... |
2023 PTD 919 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MUMTAZ ALI RAJPAR AND BROTHERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER AND OTHERS
Vs PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(2), 236(A) | Royalty/ Failure to pay tax collected |
Advance tax at the time of sale by auction---Royalty collection---Contractual liability---Petitioner were engaged in carrying out Read More... |
2023 PTD 39 2023 PTCL 329 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-X, RTO-III, LAHORE
Vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL, PROP. BRIGHT STAR ENGINEERING WORKS, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(d), 170, 122 | Refund/ Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Scope---Assessing authority while observing difference between the purchases declared in the Read More... |
2023 PTD 96 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Minimum tax/ Distributor/ Certificates |
Question before Appellate Tribunal was whether the statues of taxpayer was of a Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Fast moving consumer goods |
Minimum tax----Distributor---Fast moving consumer goods----Scope----Question before Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Fast moving consumer goods |
First moving consumer goods---Scope----Definition of fast moving consumer goods reflects Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Decisions of Supreme Court |
Decisions of Supreme Court binding on other Courts---Decision of High Court binding on Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
MUBASHIR YAMEEN
Vs ASSISTANT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(1), 137(2), 138, 140 | Attachment / recovery of tax amount |
Recovery of tax out of property and through arrest of taxpayer---Recovery of tax from persons holding Read More... |
2023 PTD 146 2023 PTCL 423 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MUHAMMAD TAHIR Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ABBOTTABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170 | Tribal Area/President Order prior to levy tax |
Resident of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area adjoining Mansehra District (the 'said tribal area')-Income tax refund, claim Read More... |
2023 PTD 163 2023 PTCL 396 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
M. SARWAR SONS, HAFIZABAD
Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 121, 122 | Unexplained income or assets/ separate notice |
Non-issuance of separate notice-Effect-Appellant was aggrieved of certain additions made by assessing officer in his income under Read More... |
2023 PTD 167 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs M/S LAHORE RUBBER STORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47(5), 57 | Rectification / ex-parte order |
Taxpayer was a retailer who was treated as manufacturer for the purposes of taxation--- Taxpayer sought rectification of ex-parte Read More... |
2023 PTD 182 2023 PTCL 555 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 | Amendment of assessment/ Seeking information from assessee |
Amendment of assessment---Seeking information from assessee-Scope-In case, if Assessing Authority comes across any information or Read More... |
2023 PTD 186 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 | Amendment of assessment/ show-cause notice |
Amendment of assessment---Opinion already formed Scope---Taxpayer company was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Read More... |
2023 PTD 186 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC. Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D | Tax, imposition |
Object, purpose and scope---Tax cannot be expropriatory or confiscatory, which takes away a citizen's property without Read More... |
2023 PTD 223 (2023)127 TAX 363 2023 PTCL 40 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC. Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D | advance income tax &un-adjustable advance income tax |
Tax, imposition of Amendment, vires of---Petitioners assailed amendment in S.236D of ITO 2001, fixing Rs.20,000 - as minimum slab for advance income tax to be collected of a person receiving services of or holding arranging functions in Read More... |
2023 PTD 223 (2023)127 TAX 363 2023 PTCL 40 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(2A), 122, 122(1), 122(5), 122(5A), 138(1), 168(2), 168(5), 170(3), 170(3)(a) | adjustment of Workers Welfare Fund (WWF) / deemed assessment /adjustments of incorrect claim |
Recovery---Refund, determining of-System generated notice, non-issuance of---Dispute was with regard to adjustment of Workers Read More... |
2023 PTD 252 (2023)127 TAX 233 2023 PTCL 482 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS TASNEEM AKHTAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 122(6A), 133 | Agriculture income / past and closed transaction |
Agriculture income---Late payment-Penalty, imposing of-Principle-Authorities sought recovery of tax under S.111 of Income Tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 312 2023 PTCL 543 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
M/S ASKARI BANK LIMITED Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49, 161(1A), 205 | Exemption from deduction of withholding tax |
Show- cause notice, assailing of---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---Failure to pay tax, collected or Read More... |
2023 PTD 316 (2022)126 TAX 452 2023 PTCL 53 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Income of trust / Tax exemption |
Overriding title-Applicant/Trust sought exemption on the plea that its income was diverted by virtue of overriding title of Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Income of trust / Tax exemption |
Cooperative Society---Status---Society is a juristic person and body incorporated and formed under Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Welfare activities/onus on taxpayer |
In relation to “income from business as is expended in Pakistan for Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Profit margin/ determination/ Taxation officer, discretion |
Profit margin----Determination-----Taxation officer, discretion of----Scope----Taxation officer has no discretion to determine in Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Bad debts |
Pre-condition----For purpose of any tax year in relation to which either Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 or Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II) LTU, ISLAMABAD Vs MESSRS INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PAKISTAN LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 221 | Rectification of mistakes |
Commissioner issued an exemption for the purposes of S. 152(5-A) allowing the respondent to make certain payments to a foreign Read More... |
2023 PTD 390 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE Vs Messrs PAKISTAN WAPDA FOUNDATION, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Rectification of mistakes |
Rectification of mistakes--Doctrine of election-Scope---Against the order of the Appellate Tribunal, Read More... |
2023 PTD 424 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, (RTO) Lahore Vs MIAN LIAQAT ALI PROPRIETOR, LIAQAT HOSPITAL, Lahore |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 39, 111, 111(1)(d), 122, 122(5), 122(8), 122(9) | Concealment of income |
Concealment of business income from sales-Amendment of deemed assessment Read More... |
2023 PTD 435 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Annexure "F" of ST return (carry forward summary) /closing stock |
Unexplained income or assets-Stock-in-trade vis-à-vis Annex "F" of sales tax return (carry forward summary)--Scope--- Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Power of Commissioner (Appeals) |
Language of S.129(1)(a) only empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to confirm, modify or annul the Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | modify or annul |
Decision in appeal---Remand--Scope---Where matter in issue is an assessment order then resort can Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Remand |
Decision in appeal-Remand-Scope--Order passed under S. 122 creating liability is an assessment order for all intents and purposes and can only be dealt under Cl. (a) of S. 129(1) and binds the Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 | Unexplained income or assets / Stock-in-trade |
Unexplained income or assets---Stock-in-trade--- Purchasing excess stock; an investment or expenditure---Scope---If any difference of declared stock is found or is effectively unearthed through audit or otherwise, it cannot be added as Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 14 | Stock-in-trade |
Stock-in-trade---Meaning-Stock-in-trade means anything produced, manufactured, purchased or otherwise acquired for manufacture, sale or exchange, and any material or supplies to be consumed in the production or manufacturing process, but does not include stocks and Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 | Interpretation |
Strict rule of interpretation-Scope-Strict rule of interpretation mandates that plain, clear and direct meaning is given to words Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS SUPER VICTORIA STORE, LAHORE Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE WHT, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 161, | Withholding/tax demand |
Dept., on taxpayer's failure to deduct withholding tax, created a certain tax demand---Appeal against such demand was dismissed---Officer Inland Revenue had failed to appreciate S. 161 of ITO 2001, in its true perspective-Since all the Read More... |
2023 PTD 179 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122, 122(1), 133, 177 | natural justice |
Principle of natural justice---Order in writing---Requirements---Order in writing must fulfill requirements of a speaking decision / order----Essential that party against whom such order is being passed must be given a proper notice confronting relevant material and Read More... |
2023 PTD 492 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122--WWFO, 1971 S.4---W.W.F. | no written order | principles of natural justice |
Written order absence of----Authorities raised demand of tax on the amount payable to Fund on the ground that no written order was passed under S.4 of Worker’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971----Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set Read More... |
2023 PTD 492 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, ISLAMABAD Vs Messrs WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LIMITED, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 153 & 152 | Payments for goods, services and contracts |
Payments to non-residents----Payments for goods, services and contracts---Scope----Taxpayer was imposed upon a liability for its failure to deduct tax at the time of making payment under Ss. 152 & 153 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2023 PTD 499 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(5A) & (9) Constitution, Art.199 | Notice under Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment----Pre-Conditions----Petitioner / assessee was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by authorities to amend its assessment---Authorities objected to maintainability of petition against show cause Read More... |
2023 PTD 505 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS PRESSON DESCON INTERNATIONAL Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 & 226 | rectification application/ Appeal Effect Order |
Appeal Effect Order, non-issuing of----Plea of rectification----Petitioner / taxpayer was aggrieved of non-issuance of Appeal Effect Order by authorities on the plea of pending rectification application----Inactions in discharge of Read More... |
2023 PTD 516 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE
Vs MESSRS DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 113 & 133(1) | Final Tax Return/ Turnover |
Final Tax Return. Turnover dispute was with regard final discharge of liability over turnover. Turnover excluded tax paid or payable as final discharge of tax liability. Explanation added through Finance Act, 2012 replicated exclusion of deemed income assessed as Read More... |
2022 PTD 1019 2022 PTCL 852 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Filing of revised return |
Reference revised return, filing of amendment of assessment. Dispute was with regard to filing of revised return which was rejected by authorities. When revised return was furnished it was in conformity with S. 114 (6A)of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI AND OTHERS Vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, F.I.A., HEADQUARTER, PESHAWAR MORR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 227 | Suit or criminal prosecution against taxpayers was barred unless a prior approval is granted by FBR |
Quashing of proceedings. Prior approval of FBR. Petitioners were serving in FBR and Income Tax department. Federal investigating Agency initiated investigation against petitioners for committing criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and misconduct. Contention Read More... |
2022 PTD 1040 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS ASIAN FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE AND OTHERS Vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 120, 122, 174(3), 177 | Charging further tax/ change of opinion |
Constitutional petition Change of opinion. Scope Dispute was with regard to concept of “change of opinion” as show cause notice issued under S. 65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (since repealed) was not applicable for a show-cause notice under S. 122 of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1069 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(4), 122(4)(a), 122(4)(b), 122(5A) | Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation |
Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation Word “or” used after S. 122 (4) (a) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Scope Two conditions, as provided in clauses (a) & (b) of S. 122(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where Commissioner wants to further Read More... |
2022 PTD 1082 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122 | Notice/ barred by time/ Amendment of assessment order |
Amendment of assessment order. Limitation Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by authorities to furnish reply warranting further amendment under S. 122 (5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Plea raised by petitioner/ taxpayer was that matter Read More... |
2022 PTD 1082 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 54, 124 & 134A | Alternate dispute resolution |
Alternate dispute resolution. Recovery notice plea raised by Petitioner Company was that all orders passed by various forums had to be taken into account before initiating recovery proceedings. The liability to pay tax was relatable to assessment order or an order Read More... |
2022 PTD 1097 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) Vs ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 23 | Eligible depreciable asset/ Initial allowance, deduction |
Taxpayer can claim deduction of initial allowance for an eligible depreciable asset (such as a building) being put to use by the taxpayer for the first time in a tax year, irrespective of the fact that the said building had been in use in the past in the hands of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1109 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114, 120, 122, 153(1)(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Sections: 12(2), O.XLVII | Ignorance of law and fact |
Ignorance of law and fact. Authorities sought review of judgment passed by High Court on the basis of conceding statement made in favour of taxpayer. The power to review in available in Constitutional jurisdiction, as provisions, of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, are Read More... |
2022 PTD 1123 (2022)126 TAX 548 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 20, 120, 122(5A), 133 | S. 23 | Repealed enactments construction. |
Repealed enactments Construction and references to Pricing for retail consumers for natural gas. Question was with regard to development surcharge as expense while computing income from business and expenditure under S. 20 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Proviso Read More... |
2022 PTD 1135 (2022)126 TAX 73 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE
Vs Syed BHAIS LIGHTING LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 133 (1) & 161 | S. 156 | Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute |
Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute was with regard to applying provision of S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, [since repealed]. Notice under S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be issued within five years or beyond the period for which taxpayer Read More... |
2022 PTD 1161 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs HNR COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120, 121(1)(d) & 122(2) | Best judgment assessment order |
Best judgment assessment order under section 121(1)(d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (“the Ordinance’) Such order cannot be made in cases where deemed assessment order has already been made under Section 120 of the Ordinance and, therefore, section Read More... |
2022 PTD 1169 (2022)125 TAX 354 2022 PTCL 463 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2022 |
UMER AYAZ KHAN Vs SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 12, 149, & 153 | Payment for goods, services and contracts |
Salary Payment for goods, services and contracts. Scope Complainant was a temporary lecturer at a government college. College deducted income tax at the rate of 20% from salary of the complainant. Contention of complainant was that his salary was below the taxable Read More... |
2022 PTD 1187 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SANOFI-AVENTIS PAKISTAN LIMITED & OTHERS Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 Ss. 80 & 148 - Drugs (Import & Export) Rules, 1976, Rule: 13 | Import of drugs for personal use |
Person Import of drugs for personal use. Scope Petitioners imported finished pharmaceutical products, which at the relevant time required certification from Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) for claiming a reduced rate of deduction of Income tax under S. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1205 (2021)124 TAX 148 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA Vs M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1) (b), 122(5A) & 133 | Limitation/ Amendment of assessment |
Limitation dispute between parties was with regard to amended assessment order filed under S. 122 (5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Respondent/taxpayer filed income tax return for year 2006 on 30-12-2006, which deemed to be an assessment in term of S. 120(1)(b) of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1290 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Definite information/ Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation |
Amendment of assessments Audit Definite information. Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation. Effect Appellant/taxpayer assailed orders passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR) (Appeal) and assessing officer. The Assessing officer by considering the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1319 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 177 | Audit Scope |
Commissioner after completion of audit shall issue audit observations and findings and then after issuing audit report he may amend the assessment order after providing opportunity of hearing to the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1319 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
Vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C | Collective Bargaining Agent/ Educational institution |
Collective Bargaining Agent. Educational institution ‘Commercial basis’ meaning of Scope. Petitioner/Establishment was aggrieved of registration of private respondent as a Collective Bargaining Agent by the Registrar of Trade Unions. Petitioner was a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1384 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
Vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C | Tax credit for charitable organizations |
Tax credit for charitable organizations. Scope one of the persons to whom the provision of S. 100C, applies is a trust Subsection (2) of S. 100C, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides the category of income which is eligible for tax credit and includes income from Read More... |
2022 PTD 1384 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
Vs COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Rules, 2001 Ss. 21(c), 2(54), 67, 120, 122(5A), 133, 153(1)(b) | R. 13 | Royalty/ Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty |
Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty. Amended assessment order. Respondent taxpayer was manufacturer of soft drinks selling its product exclusively by chain of restaurants through their outlets. Dispute was with regard to collection of tax on amount paid Read More... |
2022 PTD 1400 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
Vs COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 | Exercise of Jurisdiction/ Question of law |
Reference High Court, exercise of jurisdiction. Question of law. Scope reference under S. 133 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, lies before High Court on question of law of law only and the Court is obliged to answer the same in accordance with a rule of law. Question Read More... |
2022 PTD 1400 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
Vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1), 231A | Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment |
Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment of assessment under S. 122(5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 can be made only in cases where twin conditions namely, (i) Assessment order is erroneous; and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue, are Read More... |
2022 PTD 1411 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
Vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1), 122(5A)(9), 133(1) & 231 | Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal |
Reference Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal and tax deduction. Erroneous and prejudicial order. Proof Authorities amended assessment order of respondent taxpayer on the plea that it was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1411 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS CELLANDGENE PHARMACEUTICAL INTERNATIONAL THROUGH PARTNER
Vs THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177 | Selection for audit/ vested constitutional rights |
Petitioner assailed its selection for audit vide impugned notice on the premise that the selection did not fulfill the criteria of S. 177 (7) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Contention of Petitioner was that there were no reasonable grounds to call for the audit Read More... |
2022 PTD 1464 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs DAWOOD ISLAMIC BANK LIMITED (NOW BURJ BANK) |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 108 & 109 | Transactions between associates/ Recharacterisation of income and deductions |
Transactions between associates Recharacterisation of income and deductions. Scope Question before High Court was whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified to delete the addition made by Assessing Officer on account of interest on the advances/disbursement to a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1474 (2021)124 TAX 329 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I Vs MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 | Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles |
Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles. Entry made in accounts, as per accounting system employed by a person regularly maintained by him is considered to be valid allowable, if it is not contrary to other provisions of law. In Read More... |
2022 PTD 1535 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I
Vs MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 | Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles |
Method of accounting and accrual-basis accounting. Principles. Entry made in accounts. Assessing Authority did not accept claim of loss suffered by taxpayer due to currency exchange rate and added the loss into total income of taxpayer. Appellate Authority deleted Read More... |
2022 PTD 1535 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 53, 133, 150, 151, 159, 159(1), 159(2), 161, 233, Second Sched. Part IV, Cl. 47B | Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate |
Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate. Recovery of tax. Dispute between parties was that in absence of Certificate of exemption under S.159 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, applicant/ Tax payer was liable to recovery of tax under S. 161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1619 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
ASHIQ ALI CHAUDHARY Vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 161, 205 | Appeal filing electronically/ Art. 10-A of the Constitution |
Appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Prescribed form of appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Scope Case of petitioner was that he was required to file an appeal under S. 127of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; that R. 76 of the Income Tax Rules, 2000, provided but remedy Read More... |
2022 PTD 1627 (2021)124 TAX 237 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Vs APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 | Suspension of judgment passed by High Court |
Suspension of judgment passed by High Court. Scope Applicant sought sixty days’ time to approach the Supreme Court and in the meanwhile Income Tax Department be restrained from recovery of the tax, the request was made on the basis of referred precedents. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1632 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY (SIDA) Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HYDERABAD ZONE, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 84 | Filing of separate income tax return |
Joint Venture Association of Persons (AOP). Filing of separate income tax return. Non-Resident status, determination of Dispute was with regard to treating Joint Venture Association of Persons as Non-Resident by imposing tax at the rate of 15% instead of 5%. Held, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1679 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 4(1) (s) & 140 | Tax recovery. Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances. |
Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances. FBR is endowed with duty to facilitate taxpayers and establish mechanism to address their grievances and complaints. Under fiscal laws, including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, officials are conferred vast Read More... |
2022 PTD 1690 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(5A), 140 & 170 | Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer |
Constitutional petition. Refunds Coercive measures Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer. Grievance of petitioner / taxpayer was that amount recovered from bank account was not due and it was illegal and unlawful. The Read More... |
2022 PTD 1690 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
M/s Zia Steel Re-Rolling Mills, 1-10, Islamabad. Vs Commissioner Inland Revenue, Enf-IX, LTU, Islamabad. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 182(1), SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 & SRO No. 494(I)/2013 dated 10-06-2013 | Late filing of income tax returns |
Failure to furnish return of income. Scope Appellant was imposed upon penalties for late filing of income tax returns for the tax years 2011 and 2012. The Federal Government through SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 had allowed the steel melters to deposit the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1722 (2021)123 TAX 239 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131 & 133 | Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court/ Supreme Court |
Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court. Supreme Court is not a forum to raise fresh questions of law which have not been examined by the Tribunal or the High Court or do not even arise from the decision of the Tribunal. In numerous cases, a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1727 |
|
Supreme Court Of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 21(e) | Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed |
Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed. Contributions made by tax-payer Company to an unproved gratuity fund. Section 21(e) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 clearly stipulates that the contributions to an unapproved gratuity fund cannot be Read More... |
2022 PTD 1727 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD Vs PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Ss. 172, 127 & 227 | S. 9 | Courts to try all civil suits unless barred |
Representatives Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) Bar of suits in Civil Courts. Scope Plaintiff challenged a show-cause notice issued under S. 172(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through a civil suit. The Order passed under S. 172(3)(f) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2022 PTD 1742 (2022)126 TAX 107 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-IV, KARACHI
Vs MUHAMMAD HAMID |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 65, 62 & 136 | Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment |
Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment on basis of “Definite Information” Nature and meaning of term “definite information”. Scope. Question before High Court was whether assessment of taxpayer could be reopened Read More... |
2022 PTD 1752 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS CHINA NATIONAL ELECTRIC WIRE AND CABLE IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 128, 129, 129(4), 131, 131(1), 122 | Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order |
Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order, legality of Scope. Appellate Tribunal while invoking its jurisdiction under S. 221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on its own observed that in an earlier order it had Read More... |
2022 PTD 1839 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD Vs MESSRS PEARL SECURITY (PVT.) LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 170, 170(4), 170(5)(b) | Limitation / Inaction of authorities Effect |
Question was with regard to limitation of tax refund. Taxpayer was estopped from asserting a favorable refund order by default where it had statutory recourse against inaction of authorities, which it opted not to pursue. Taxpayer not filing an appeal under S. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1876 |
|
Baluchistan High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA
Vs MESSRS BALOCHISTAN ONYX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 133 | Audit, selection for Definite information. Pre- condition |
Audit, selection for definite information. Pre- condition. Case of respondent/taxpayer was selected for audit by Commissioner Inland Revenue. The Adjudicating authority i.e. Commissioner Inland Revenue in violation to legal provision as it stood then on 07/07/2009 Read More... |
2022 PTD 1889 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report |
Amendment of assessment. Audit ‘Definite information’. Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report. Effect department assailed officer amending the deemed assessment was set aside. Amended assessment was framed on Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Audit report/audit observation/ objections/ charge sheet |
Amendment of assessment. Audit. Procedure Scope ‘Definite information’ Assessing Officer, after formulation of the audit report/audit observation/objections/charge sheet, ought to first confront the same to the taxpayer and secondly, after considering Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Audit/ Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment. Scope Section 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, does not in itself provide any power or absolute empowerment to modify assessment or re-determine the income of taxpayer. Key point to be kept in mind is that it is not a return of income Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Conducting of audit proceeding is just a process |
Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure. Scope selection for audit or even conducting and audit does not mean modification of assessment. Selection for audit and thereafter conducting of audit proceeding is just a process. Assessing officer, before invoking the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 | Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment |
Expression ‘subject to this section’ Scope. Provisions of S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, start with the language “subject to this section”. Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment of an assessment which means it Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI Vs M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 177 & 122 | Definite information |
Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure Scope. ‘Definite information’ Scope. Deemed assessment, if selected for audit, may be amended by invoking jurisdiction under S. 122(1), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, subject to fulfillment of conditions as envisaged Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS NEW DADU SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI
Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131, 132 | Limitation Successive appeals |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Limitation Successive appeals on the same cause of action. Scope. Appellant filed application for grant of stay along with supporting appeal for the third time against the same order of refusal to stay the recovery of tax demand by the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1927 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
Vs The CIR, RTO, Peshawar. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153, 153(1)(b), 161, 177, Second Schedule-Part (IV)-Clause 46AA | Payments for goods, services and contracts |
SRO 586(1)/91 dated: 30-06-1991---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Payments for goods, services and contracts---Exemptions and tax concessions-Scope---Department raised demand and imposed liabilities upon the appellant for its Read More... |
2023 PTD 911 2022 PTCL 899 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE Vs SHAZIA ZAFAR |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 111, 122 & 133 | Unexplained income or assets/ Separate notice |
Unexplained income or assets Separate notice, issuance of Words “the person offers no explanation” and “or the explanation offered by the person is not, in the Commissioner’s opinion, satisfactory” Scope Dispute was with regard to Read More... |
2022 PTD 1942 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
Vs The CIR, RTO, Peshawar. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Qanun-e-Shahadat 1984 Art. 129(e) | Administration of justice |
Thing required by law to be done in a certain manner must be done in the same manner as prescribed by law or not at all. |
2023 PTD 911 2022 PTCL 899 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA Vs THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 13 | Double jeopardy / Protection against double punishment |
Protection against double punishment and self-incrimination. Scope issuance of a notice regarding the same taxed amounts tantamount to double jeopardy which cannot be given legal credence but also offends and defies the fundamental rights set out in Art. 13 of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 187 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD Vs ABDUL HAMEED, LABOUR CONTRACTOR |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss: 53(1)(b), 153, 153(1)(c), 153(9) | Services, meaning/ Rendering of labour and carriage services |
"Services", meaning of Scope. Rendering of labour and carriage services. Whether income from labour and carriage services is liable to fixed tax regime. Held, that definition of ‘services’ in subsection (9) of section 153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1673 (2022)126 TAX 438 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Delay was negligible |
Dismissal of revision petition being barred by 16 days/Validity/Such delay was negligible/Commissioner instead of knocking out the petitioner on technicalities, ought to have considered his prayer on merits/Order of Commissioner refusing Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
Vs TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Judiciary |
Judiciary is respected not on account of its power to legalize injustice on technical grounds, but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Judgment |
Judgment is an authority only in respect to what it decides, and only with regard to the proposition of law raised, in that case, and therefore point not argued before the Court cannot be considered to have been dealt with by its Read More... |
2022 PTD 683 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-1), RTO, RAWALPINDI Vs TARIQ MAHMOOD. PROPRIETOR STANDARD MEDICAL STORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 122(5A), 133(1) & Second Schedule, Part-III, clause 8 | Fast Moving consumer goods |
Tax rebate, the entitlement of Authorities were aggrieved of the order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue against tax rebate allowed to taxpayer who Read More... |
2022 PTD 1 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
SIKANDAR HAYAT AND 16 OTHERS Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, Second Schedule, Part-I, Clause 146, Part-IV, Clause 110 | Tribal Area/exemption from payment of income tax |
Tax Relief Petitioners were civil servants who claimed tax relief in their salaries on the plea that they were also residents of erstwhile Provisionally Read More... |
2022 PTD 11 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
RAZA MOTOR INDUSTRIES Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.177 [as substituted through Finance Act, 2010] | Selection of Audit/ Call documents |
Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of notices of selection of their case for audit. Plea raised by petitioners/taxpayers was that Read More... |
2022 PTD 19 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(3), 162, 174, 174(3) | Burden on Department to justify delayed proceedings |
Records, information collection and audit---Maintenance of record by taxpayer---Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record. Maintenance Read More... |
2022 PTD 51 (2022)125 TAX 55 2023 PTCL 60 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT (LTU), LAHORE Vs MESSRS PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 24(11), 122, 120(1)(b), 122(2), 122(5A) | Reassessment made/ beyond time limitation |
Reassessment principle limitation taxpayer was aggrieved of reassessment made by Assessing Officer beyond time limitation. It was Read More... |
2022 PTD 97 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
Dr. ZAFAR SAJJAD through authorized attorney Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 2(20), 12, 18(b), 120, 122(9), 133 & Sched. II, Part-III cl. 1(2) proviso [as inserted by Finance Act, 2019] | Amendment effects/changes in law/ clinical supplements and incentives |
Taxpayer, a permanent employee of a Hospital Salary - Clinical supplements and incentives. Show-Cause notice, issuance of Taxpayers (assessees) were aggrieved of show-cause notice issued to them to include clinical supplements and incentives received by them from Read More... |
2022 PTD 109 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA Vs THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 18, 20, 111, 111(1)(d), 111(1)(d)(i), 120(A), 122(1), 122(5)(ii), 129(1) | Unexplained income or assets/ Production and sales are the particulars of income but not income by itself |
Appellant assailed order passed by department as well as Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the amount of gross sales was held to be its income and was taxed accordingly. Appellant had rightly availed Amnesty Scheme under the Voluntary Declaration of Domestic Read More... |
2022 PTD 187 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ETC. Vs JAHANGIR KHAN TAREEN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(4), 122(5), 122(5A), 122(9), 209 & 209(2) | Show cause notice Scope and purpose |
Show cause notice was delivered to a person by an authority in order to get the reply back with a reasonable cause as to why a particular action should not be taken against him with regard to the defaulting act. By and large, it was a well-defined and Read More... |
2022 PTD 232 (2021)124 TAX 552 2022 PTCL 1 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS Vs MUHAMMAD TAHIR AND BROTHERS OGHI MANSEHRA AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, 133, Second Schedule | Merger of Tribal Areas/ all laws including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 became applicable |
Tribal Areas Merger of Tribal Areas into settled areas Automatic applicability of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to areas that cease to be Tribal Areas by operation of Art. 247(6) of the Constitution. Question before High Court was whether after cessation of a District Read More... |
2022 PTD 283 (2022)126 TAX 370 2022 PTCL 513 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH MANAGER LEGAL
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170, 170(2), 221 | Retrospective effect of Circular |
FBR Circular No. 4 of 2000, dated 17-2-2000 (FBR Circular) Workers Welfare Fund. Adjustment, availing of Retrospective effect of Circular Scope. Petitioners/ companies were required to contribute towards their workers’ welfare as Workers’ Welfare Fund. Read More... |
2022 PTD 290 2023 PTCL 466 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS MONNOOWAL TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 67, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9), 133, 154(4), 169(1) | Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return |
Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return. Dispute was with regard to apportionment of expenditure incurred and adjustments claimed by taxpayer under R. 231 of Income Tax Rules, 2002. Plea raised by authorities was that apportionment of expenditures was Read More... |
2022 PTD 305 (2022)125 TAX 65 2022 PTCL 430 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
HONG KONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD. Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 61, 62, 135 & 136 | Loan to employee/ expenditure |
Loan to employee’s Factual controversy. Appellant/taxpayer was a Banking Company and dispute was with regard to amounts advanced to its employees as loan. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ignored examination of factual aspect that whether any expenditure was Read More... |
2022 PTD 310 2022 PTCL 437 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 | Rectification of mistake. Pendency of Reference before High Court against the same order |
Appellant sought rectification of order passed by the Tribunal. Appellant had also filed an Income Tax Reference Application against the same order of the Tribunal before the High Court. Appellant could not have the best of both worlds, as seeking relief Read More... |
2022 PTD 325 (2021)123 TAX 300 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 | Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction |
Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction Scope Resolution of once decided issue tantamount to “review”, which is not allowed to the Tribunal and falls under the domain of Superior Courts. Rectification of mistake Scope of rectification is Read More... |
2022 PTD 325 (2021)123 TAX 300 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 & 132 | Interim relief to taxpayer granted by Appellate Tribunal |
Adjudication by Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Petitioner taxpayer impugned order of Appellate Tribunal whereby interim relief already granted to taxpayer and extended subsequently five times by Appellate Tribunal was later declined during pendency of main appeal, Read More... |
2022 PTD 404 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LTD. Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5), 122(5A), 122(5AA) & 122(4) | Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment |
Amendment of assessments---Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment in terms of Ss.122 (5A) & 122(5AA) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Time Barred amendment in assessments not sustainable---Scope---Petitioner/Taxpayer impugned notice for further Read More... |
2022 PTD 413 (2022)126 TAX 218 2022 PTCL 503 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
MANZOOR AHMAD Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE II, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(m,), 111, 111(1)(b), 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 127, 131, 231A | Amendment of assessments---Failure to confront specific provision |
Failure to confront specific provision in notice---Scope---Taxpayer assailed order passed by assessing officer whereby he had amended the demand assessment order and the dismissal of his appeal---Show cause notice issued to the taxpayer did not reflect the addition Read More... |
2022 PTD 420 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ALPHA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL ZONE-A, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 65 & 136 | Additional assessment---Exercise of authority under S.65 |
Exercise of authority under S.65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for additional assessment of taxpayer---Inadmissible expenditures---Scope---Question before High Court was whether income tax assessment of taxpayer, which was an insurance company, could be reopened Read More... |
2022 PTD 439 2022 PTCL 534 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 | Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer/ Income from other sources |
Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer is income and taxable under S. 5 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--Dividends constitute a separate block of income that is brought to tax in terms of S. 5 of the 2001 Ordinance---Dividends are to be taxed as a separate Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 | Each tax year is a separate unit of account/ Exemption clause |
Each tax year is a separate unit of account and taxation and the law has to be applied as it stood in respect of that tax year alone. Tax statute---Exemption clause---Retrospective effect---Scope---Exemption clause has a beneficial effect does not mean that it Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 5 & 150 | Dividends, tax on |
Distinction---Section 5 speaks of the dividend being “received” by a person from a company, while S. 150 speaks of the dividend being “paid” by the latter---Former is a general expression , bringing to tax all that is received by way of Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI Vs BROOK BOND PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 50(4A), 52 & 86 | Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default |
Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default---Determination---Sale agreement---Scope---Respondent-assessee claimed that disputed amount was not commission rather it was trade discount, therefore no tax was deducted---Assessing Officer made assessment under Read More... |
2022 PTD 467 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 | Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss. 161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to deduct or deposit withholding Read More... |
2022 PTD 547 (2023)127 TAX 166 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 | Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Default surcharge, determination of---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss.161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to Read More... |
2022 PTD 547 (2023)127 TAX 166 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ALLIED ENGINEERING AND SERVICES LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 67, 169, 18, 20 & 11 | Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business |
Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business”---Composite business activities---Expenses common to income under Normal Business Income and Presumptive Tax Regime---Apportionment of deductions---Scope---Question before High Read More... |
2022 PTD 558 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 | Minimum tax on the income of certain persons |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Appellant/taxpayer adjusted tax under Cl. (c) of subsection (2) of S.113 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, For two years---Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue (DCIR) adjusted such carried forward excess amount from Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 | Minimum tax on the income of certain persons |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Clause (a) of subsection (2) of S.113, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides that the aggregate of the person’s turnover as defined in subsection (3) for the tax year shall be treated as the income of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 113, 122, 122(1) & 122(5A) | Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law |
Scope---Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law as it is and have no authority to add, delete or subtract any word in or from the language used by the legislature and in a taxing statute, a tax on any person is to be levied by clear and unambiguous words and Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-III), LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT Vs M/S NEW JUBILEE INSURANCE CO. LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 26(a), 99, 122 (5A) & 133 | Term ‘subject to adjustment’/ Amendment of assessment |
Term ‘subject to adjustment’---Amendment of assessment---Scope---Authorities withdrew the advantages given to taxpayer company on account of its associated company and revised the assessment order by making an addition to its tax assessment---Appellate Read More... |
2022 PTD 618 2022 PTCL 624 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM Vs THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 176 | S. 3 | Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts |
Notice to obtain information or evidence---Offence of money laundering---Scope---Petitioners through constitutional petitions attempted to set the process at naught from initiating the proceedings as under took by the Income Tax department in terms of Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM Vs THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 111 | S. 3 | Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts |
Unexplained income or assets---Offense of money laundering---Scope---Non-declaration of an asset by assessee under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is not a scheduled offence, unless proved otherwise as required under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM Vs THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010) Ss. 3 & 5 | Offence of money laundering/ property is proceeds of crime |
National Executive Committee to combat money laundering---Scope---Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, a person is presumed to be guilty of offence of money laundering if he acquires, converts, possesses, uses or transfers property knowing or having reason to Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SALEEM BUTT Vs PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177(1) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54. | Audit Notice / Mala fide, proof of |
Suit for declaration and injunction. Mala fide, proof of- Show-cause notice Plaintiff/ taxpayer assailed show-cause notice to conduct audit on the plea of mala fide and discrimination. Held. Mere allegation of mala fides was not enough to dislodge presumption of Read More... |
2022 PTD 716 2022 PTCL 793 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 11(2) | Show cause notice Tax not paid |
Show cause notice Tax not paid Petitioner was income tax assessee, who called in question show-cause notices for tax period November 2013 to March 2018 and July 2013 to October 2013 respectively issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue. Plea raised by petitioner Read More... |
2022 PTD 729 (2022)126 TAX 600 2022 PTCL 776 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
ROMEX INTERNATIONAL Vs The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 127(2), 128(1AA) | Applicability Interim relief |
Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravabit’ Applicability Interim relief, extension in delay in disposal of appeal. Petitioners were tax payers who sought extension in interim relief. ----Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravait’ could be involed only Read More... |
2022 PTD 760 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, LAHORE Vs MESSRS MECO (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 S. 64 | Limitation for assessment |
Limitation for assessment Scope. Question before High Court was whether time imitation for an assessment also included the time consumed in service of order, whereas S. 64 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, determined the time limitation for an assessment only. Read More... |
2022 PTD 809 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY Vs PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 S. 177, 177(1), 213, 214, 214C | Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner |
Audit Selection of case. Commissioner and FBR , jurisdictions of Commissioner under S. 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is required to apply his mind and provide reasons for selection, Whereas FBRunder S. 214C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, may select a person Read More... |
2022 PTD 866 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY Vs PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 Ss.177, 213, 214 & 214C Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner |
Constitutional petition Audit, selection of case. Jurisdiction of commissioner. Judicial review. Directions of FBR Scope. Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of issuance of notices by Commissioner selecting there cases for audit on the basis of directions from Read More... |
2022 PTD 866 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, LAHORE Vs M/S PANTHER SPORTS & RUBBER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD, ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 161(1A), 165(2B) & 174(3) Income Tax Rules, 2002 Rr. 29(4) & 44(4). | Records to be maintained for a period of six years |
Books of account, documents and records to be maintained for a period of six years. Scope of section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Taxpayer is obliged to maintain the record under section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for a period of six years Read More... |
2022 PTD 888 (2022)126 TAX 9 2022 PTCL 544 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-VII, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-II, LAHORE
Vs MESSRS TECHLOGIX PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 113(3)(b), 133(1), 153(1)(b), 153(6) & first proviso | Payments for goods and services/ Insertion of third proviso |
Maximum tax Scope Dispute was with regard to applicability of proviso added to S. 153(6) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside orders passed by two forums below. --- Turnover, in terms of reenacted S. 113(3)(b) of Income Tax Read More... |
2022 PTD 893 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SAKRAND SUGAR MILLS LIMITED Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 111 & 182 | Assessment and penalty proceedings. |
Assessment and penalty proceedings. Penalty, imposing of Particulars of income. Determination. Read More... |
2022 PTD 901 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE Vs NEWAGE CABLES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 153(7)(iv) | Amendment of assessment/ Failure to issue of show cause notice |
Customs General Order No. 11/2007, dated 28-08-2007. Amendment of assessment “Manufacturer” Meanings -- Failure to issue of show cause notice. Scope. Question before High Court was whether business of respondent regarding slitting/cutting of copper Read More... |
2022 PTD 910 (2022)125 TAX 388 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs MESSRS GRAYS LEASING LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133(1), 133(5), 161 | Lease rental income |
Lease rental income. Scope Dispute was with regard to assessment of lease rental income under S. 12(19) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on actual receipt basis and not on accrual basis. The Assessee could not claim depreciation, initial and normal and simultaneously Read More... |
2022 PTD 951 2022 PTCL 811 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Vs ASIF KAMAL |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177, 177(6) | Appeal dismissed/ appellant dept. was absent |
Preamble Revenue cases Lack of assistance provided by the counsel and officials of the FBR and its Inland Revenue department. During the hearing before the Supreme Court, the copies of the show cause notice sent to the taxpayer, the audit report, the response Read More... |
2022 PTD 965 (2022)125 TAX 351 2022 PTCL 480 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD
Vs MESSRS NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 115(4), 120, 122, 122C, 122(1), 122(5A), 133(1), 169(2) | Altering/amending assessment order |
Altering/amending assessment order. Commissioner income tax. Jurisdiction. Assessment order based on statement of income furnished under S. 115(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could be altered/ amended by Commissioner under S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Read More... |
2022 PTD 978 (2022)126 TAX 43 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
QASIM SHAH MARBLE FACTORY UMARY, DISTRICT BAJUR THROUGH PROPRIETOR
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Preamble Constitution Article: 199 | Exemption from income tax |
Preamble Notifications SRO No. 1212(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 & SRO No. 1213(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 19. Factual controversy Exemption from income tax Petitioners were industrialists who sought exemption from income tax charged in Read More... |
2022 PTD 981 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Tax by a legislative act authority |
17). Before parting with this judgment we may observe that: No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. A tax can only be imposed by a legislative Act and not on executive order. It thus embodies the democratic Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Adverse Action |
For taking any adverse action, affording of an opportunity is prerequisite. An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of hearing to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Show Cause Notice |
The Hon’ble Lahore High Court in the judgment reported as 2013 PTD 1536 PLD 2013 Lah. 634 where their lordship observed as under:“Show cause notice is not a casual correspondence or a tool or license to commence a Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Due Process of Law |
The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Fair Trial |
The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Audi Alterm Partem |
Audi alteram partem - Principle of - We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the impugned order was passed without providing/affording opportunity of being heard, hence violated the well know principle of “audi alteram Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Right of access to justice |
Right of access to justice - An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of heaving to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the cardinal principles of such basic norms is that Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Deemed assessment |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Malafide Intention |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
Vs CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Mandatory notice |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs /S PUNJAB POULTRY FEED (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 133, 133(5) ITO 1979 S 50, 62 | Opportunity of hearing |
The questions of Law involved in the cases arisen out of liability being enforced by the Revenue have not been attended to and dilated upon by the Appellate Tribunal.” These appeals are remanded to learned Income Tax Appellate Read More... |
2020 PTD 224 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S .9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 | Insurance Premium |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred treaties. Both the insurance Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 | Avoidance of double taxation |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD. Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Deduction of Income Tax |
Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More... |
2020 PTD 7 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD. Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Pakistan source Income |
Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More... |
2020 PTD 7 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Writ jurisdiction |
In case titled The Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha (AIR 2012 S.C. 2250) it has been held as under: “Ordinarily a writ application does not lie against a charge sheet or show-cause notice for the Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice/Petition |
In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Petition against Show Cause |
In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Petition against Show Cause |
In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice |
In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice/Petition |
In light of the above principles, what needs to be examined is whether the instant petitions are maintainable. The sole ground agitated by the petitioner is that since the question involved and/ or raised in the impugned notices is Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
M/S. A.F. FERGUSON & CO. & OTHERS Vs PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(10), 2(26), 32, 80, 80(2), 92, 92(1) 92(2), 92(3), 92(4), 92(5), 93 | Taxation of association |
Principles of taxation of association of persons - Filing of individual returns of income by the partners of firm of their total income - Amount received by a partner from the firm in hand of partner - Exemption - Firm and its partners - Read More... |
2020 PTD 27 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) | Security Deposits |
Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More... |
2020 PTD 153 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sec: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) | Lease Key Money |
Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More... |
2020 PTD 153 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD Vs MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Black Listed or deregistered |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD Vs MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Flying Invoices |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD Vs MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Pecuniary jurisdiction |
So far as the Question No. 1 is concerned, the same pertains to pecuniary jurisdiction of the officer, who has passed Order-in-Original. In a case involving contravention on the part of a registered person with respect of assessment of Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs Messrs GREENVELLY PREMIUM SUPER MARKET (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.122, 132, 131 & 133 | Addition deleted |
FACTS: the respondent is running the business of departmental stores. The respondent e filed return of income by declaring loss of Rs.15,734,624/- for tax year 20l4. Respondent selected for audit, deemed assessment was amended under Read More... |
2020 PTD 260 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX
OFFICER, PESHAWAR Vs SAFEER JAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 12(18), 13(aa) | Gift deeds |
Whether gift amounts received by one partner from other partners in the firm/AOP could be added by the tax officer under S. 12(18) of the erstwhile Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Held, that plain reading of S. 12(18) of the Ordinance Read More... |
2020 PTD 278 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
SHAKIR ALI RAJPUT Vs The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 115(3)(b), 115(3)(d), 231-A, 236-P | Resident/Overseas Pakistani are exempt of filing of income tax return |
Complainant was a Non-Resident/Overseas Pakistani who was aggrieved of deduction of tax on his remittances exceeding fifty thousand rupees. The Complainant, who was Non-Resident working abroad and who Read More... |
2020 PTD 642 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SHEHARYAR AHMED Vs THE STATE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)/ Grant of Bail |
Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)---Allegedly, accused, Clearing Agent, was an instrumental in the entire rip-off for illegally importing a vehicle with intention to cause loss to Read More... |
2020 PTD 645 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163 | Premium Paid to Non-Resident Companies |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX
OFFICER, PESHAWAR Vs SAFEER JAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 12(18), 13(aa) | Cash Withdrawal from Share of AOP |
8. A plain reading of section 12(18) of the Ordinance shows that the said provision is attracted when loans, advances, and gifts are received in cash. However, Read More... |
2020 PTD 278 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
M/S BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH SENIOR MANAGER TAXATION Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 132 | Bank accounts had been frozen, which offended in Constitutionally protected fundamental right |
Petitioner / taxpayer sought direction of High Court under Constitutional jurisdiction to set aside order of Appellate Tribunal whereby taxpayer’s application under O.XXXIX Rr. 1 & 2, C.P.C was rejected---Contention of Read More... |
2020 PTD 696 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF Vs THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Rectification of mistake---Limitation |
Taxpayer filed normal returns for the tax year 2013 which was deemed to have been assessed under S. 120(1), ITO 2001---Assessing authority observed that the taxpayer was engaged in the business of supply of medicines, therefore, normal Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF Vs THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Invoking the provisions of S.122(5) without any material |
Taxpayer himself had declared income under normal tax regime as well as under final tax regime which stood subjected to withholding provisions of 153(1)(a) of ITO 2001---Assessing authority without any basis presumed that all sales were Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF Vs THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Rectification of mistake/Error apparent from the record/ two views or opinions/ Limitation |
Application of S. 221 ITO 2001 is only permissible if the error is apparent, Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MESSRS K.B. CORPORATION AND ANOTHER Vs THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 140, 148, 162, 162(1), 228 | invocation of erroneous sections of law/ Collection of tax at import stage |
Section 33, ST Act, 1990 contains penal clauses and can only be invoked for contravention of respective provisions of ST Act, 1990---Section 148 ITO 2001 prescribes the procedure for collection of income tax at import stage by the Read More... |
2020 PTD 713 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 | Documents in custody/ Burden of proof/Penalty |
Penalty, imposition of---Taxpayer was aggrieved of confirmation of additions to value of property as well as foreign remittances made by the authorities. |
2020 PTD 733 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 | Administration of justice |
Principle of consistency---Object, purpose and scope---Object of principle of consistency is to maintain uniformity and consistency of views/decisions in different Benches of Court/Tribunal and is aimed at to foster, develop and Read More... |
2020 PTD 733 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs M/S RASHID AND SAQIB TRADING COMPANY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Expression "mistake apparent from the record |
Where rectification application dismissed by Appellate Tribunal, the Reference application before Court is not maintainable because the order of the Tribunal on application does not merge into final order--- Where the rectification Read More... |
2020 PTD 782 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD Vs ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court |
Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court-Power of High Court to convert review petition into an application for correction of clerical error---Scope---In the exercise of its Reference jurisdiction under S. Read More... |
2020 PTD 782 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD Vs ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133 | Conversion of one type of proceedings into another |
Conversion of one type of proceedings into another---No fetters or bar could be placed on the High Court and or the Supreme Court to convert and treat one type of proceedings into another Read More... |
2020 PTD 785 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs M/S FORMANITE HOUSING SCHEME, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 120(1), 122(9), 133 | Unexplained income or assets---Findings of fact |
Taxpayer's declaration of its income was disputed by the Taxation Officer while placing reliance on the deposits made in the Bank accounts maintained by the taxpayer, on the basis whereof show- cause notice was issued which culminated in Read More... |
2020 PTD 799 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ELITE ESTATE (PVT.) LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 152 | Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company |
Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---In terms the consultancy agreement executed between the parties, the foreign company was to provide Read More... |
2020 PTD 802 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
BANK ALFALAH LIMITED Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 176, 176(1)(a) | Income tax authorities had vast powers in respect of getting information |
Privileged information---Fishing inquiry--- Petitioner Bank assailed notice issued by income tax authorities regarding providing of details in connection with debit/credit card machines installed by petitioner to different commercial Read More... |
2020 PTD 827 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Refund of Advace Tax u/s 148 |
Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Tax Credit u/s 65D |
Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Refund barred by Limitation |
We are reminded here of what was said by this Court in Pfizer Laboratories Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1998 SC 64 ("Pfizer case"). The facts Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Cancellation of assessment w.r.t Time Limitation |
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Pending Proceedings |
In “Collector of Sales Tax and Central Excise, LTU, Karachi v. Messrs Pak Suzuki Co. Ltd., Karachi”(PTCL 2016 CL. 63), the Hon’ble Supreme Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Retrospective Effect |
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years 1986-87 to 1991-92 Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) | Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution |
Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on Read More... |
2019 PTD 587 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) | Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment |
Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued Read More... |
2019 PTD 598 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) | Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution |
Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on income of Federal and Provincial Governments and local authorities under S.49 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether certain statutory Read More... |
2019 PTD 587 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED Vs THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) | Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment |
Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued to the taxpayer, but on due date neither anybody attended the office nor any application for adjournment was filed---Assessing authority made provisional assessment Read More... |
2019 PTD 598 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Minimum Tax |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Minimum Tax |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Final Tax Regime |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Double Taxation |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer is subject to the payment of income tax under Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Refund |
From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Amendment of Assessment |
From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and yardsticks. As stated above, Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Power of Commissioner and Delegates |
In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Amendment of Assessment |
In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Independent Incidence |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2004 |
M. Akram Tahir, D.R. Vs Naveed A. Andrabi |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(9A) & Second Sched.; Part IV, Cl. (59), 136 | deemed income |
---S. 12(9A) & Second Sched. Part IV, CI. (59)----Companies Ordinance (XLVII OF 1984), s. 245----Income deemed to accrue or arise in Read More... |
2004 P T D (Trib.) 1104 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
E.U. Khawaja, C.A. Vs Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111 | Penalty for concealment of income/ Mens rea |
Maintenance of accounts on mercantile system of accountancy--Interest on Government securities---Declaration of interest on cash basis. Assessing Officer pointed out that interest on Government securities as declared was less than that Read More... |
2002 PTD 713 (2002)85 TAX 125 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Ahmad Kamal, D.R. Vs Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 | Enactment has its own objectives |
Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working under another enactment until and unless the Legislature specifically so directs, Read More... |
2002 PTD 716 (2002)85 TAX 145 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Ahmad Kamal, D.R. Vs Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 | Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working u |
Annual Letting Value---(ALV) assessed by Provincial and Taxation Department under Property Tax Act for the purpose of levying property tax was not binding on the Assessing Officer for the purpose of income-tax under Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 716 (2002)85 TAX 145 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai, D.R. Vs Abid Sherazi |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,52 | Assessee/Non-cooperative |
Assessment, setting aside of Justification First Appellate Authority was not justified in setting aside the assessments second time when the Read More... |
2002 PTD 333 84 TAX 231 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 8, 3(1)(x), 4, 5 & 7 | FBR/Apex Authority/no role in quasi-judicial function |
Instructions/directions issued by Central Board of Revenue---Binding on Assessing Officers and all other Tax Authorities performing administrative functions, but not on assessee and Appellate Authorities---Central Board of Revenue is an Read More... |
2002 PTD 720 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R. Vs Hassan Naeem, I.T.P. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 143,66-A, 134-B, 156, SOC, 22(c), 80C | Tax on tax |
Income from business of profession Crossing up the receipt of “tax on tax” Department treated the assessee’s tax liability Read More... |
2002 PTD 337 84 TAX 223 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S.4(3)(vii) & 17,5 Securities and Exchange Ordinance (XVII of 1969), S.14 | Gain from Bank/ Shares of assessee |
Assessee received gain from Bank earned from sale of shares of assessee in pursuance of S.14 of Securities and Exchange Ordinance. 1969-Authority found such receipt to be income Contention of assessee was that such receipt being of Read More... |
2002 PTD 728 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Iqbal Abadan, C.A. Vs Dr. Fazal Abrejo, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xv)(ii), 17B, clause (8A) of Part I of Second Schedule | Exemption/ Foreign remittances |
Exemption Assessee had created immovable assets out of foreign remittances received and had claimed exemption- Assets were partially disposed Read More... |
2002 PTD 345 84 TAX 194 = |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 4, 4(3)(vii) , 17(5) | Assessment |
Assessment is an order through which the Revenue expresses itself on the income earned by or accrued to an assessee during a particular accounting period-Such an expression is generally based upon the declarations and affirmations made Read More... |
2002 PTD 728 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Sh. Anwar ul Haq Vs Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 13(1) (aa), 138E | Penalty for concealment of income |
Penalty for concealment of income etc. Addition Settlement Addition made under S. 13(1) (aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was reduced by Read More... |
2002 PTD 350 84 TAX 178 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND WEALTH TAX, SARGODHA ZONE, SARGODHA Vs Messrs IRSHAD ANWAR & CO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(7), 65 & 66âA, 129, 134 | Assessment/ agreement |
Additional assessment---Re-opening of agreed assessment---Agreed assessment though a settlement of contractual nature could not be declared to be a voluntary agreement between the Revenue and assessee fulfilling all the codal Read More... |
2002 PTD 750 85 TAX 470 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Naveed Haider, A.C.A. Vs Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 62, 34 | Foreign exchange gain and loss |
Preamble set-off loss Foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gains as Read More... |
2002 PTD 358 84 TAX 217 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi Vs Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | Appeal to AT/ Grounds of appeal |
Issue raised by the assessee at the Appellate stage without having the same agitated through specific grounds of appeal would not arise out of the orders of both the Authorities below, same could not be raised before the Tribunal in Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
REEM RICE MILL (PVT.) LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Minister of Finance, Revenue Division, Lahore and others |
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 | Salary paid to Directors in cash |
Directors Deductions Admissibility- Salary paid in cash to the Directors of the company was disallowed by the Assessing Officer being not Read More... |
2002 PTD 363 85 TAX 478 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi Vs Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | expenses |
----Profit and loss expenses---Disallowance of---History of the case---Relevance---Admissibility of claim of expenses under each head for every year is to be considered independently on the basis of facts available for that Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed Vs Nadir Mumtaz Warraich, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 135 , 12(18A) | Rectification of mistake |
Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal reported case of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal in a reference application Rectification on the Read More... |
2002 PTD 373 84 TAX 235 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi Vs Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | Sale promotion and advertisement expenses |
Sale promotion and advertisement expenses --- Five per cent . disallowance of expenses by referring to history of the case without mentioning any other reason was confirmed by the First Appellate Authority --- Validity --- Such Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ZONE-B, LAHORE Vs Makhdoom Zada Syed HASSAN MEHMOOD through Legal Heirs and 81 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , 135, 108 , 115, 117, 122 | Penalty proceedings/ Civil liability |
Income Tax Act of 1922 Ss. 28 & 51 Penalty proceedings Nature Penalty proceedings both under the Income-Tax Act, 1922 or Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 381 85 TAX 499 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif, D.R. Vs Javed Iqbal |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 55. 55(2) , (3), 59 | Extension of date for filing of return |
Extension of date for filing of return---Central Board of Revenue could not take away, by issuing a Circular, the powers of extending the date of filing of return vested in the Assessing Officer by S.55(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 769 2002 TAX 140 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
HUMAYOUN KHAN, DIRECTOR MANAKIN TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Vs CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 | Pre-condition/ Appeal |
Constitutional petition Pre-condition for filing appeal against assessment order to deposit 15% of the amount of tax assessed Petitioner Read More... |
2002 PTD 385 85 TAX 483 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Mehtab Khan Vs Syed Riazuddin |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, 2(1)(16)(ii) | Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner |
Powers of IAC Wealth Tax Officer's order---Net wealth---Liabilities not against any assets created by the assessee---Disallowance of---Inspecting Assistant Commissioner revised the assessment by adding the liabilities on the ground that Read More... |
2002 PTD 773 85 TAX 77 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI Vs Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Tax payable/ Basis of assessment |
Payment of tax with return of income “Tax payable on the basis of assessment” Distinction Clear distinction exists between the Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
A. H. Faridi Vs Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 20, 19 | Deductions / Income from house property |
Salary and allowances --- Electricity expenses --- Tenant’s burdon borne by the property income and was not a business expenditure --- Salary of electrician was covered by the allownces of repair allowed against the property Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 779 85 TAX 60 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI Vs Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Exemption / Claim of exemption |
Exemption-- Additional tax for failure to pay tax Claim of exemption Non-Payment of tax with return Assessment Rejection of exemption Levy of Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Kh. Muhammad Iqbal Vs Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Income from other source | Supply of electricity |
Income from other source- Supply of electricity---Interest income on delayed payment of electricity bills---Taxability---Interest income is not to be considered as part and parcel of the business income and its assessment under S.30 of Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI Vs Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Penalty Concealment of income |
Penalty Concealment of income Wrong claim of exemption –Effect-- Assessee, on the one hand had been allowed to claim exemption from tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Kh. Muhammad Iqbal Vs Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Exemption provision |
Fiscal statute---Exemption provision---Assessee has to prove himself to be within the four corners of the exemption provisions---Unlike charging provision when an exemption clause is interpreted the doubt is resolved in favour of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD AFZAL Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE II, LAHORE and another |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2, 2(16) ,2(m) | Assessment/ Taking over of the property by Liquadation Board |
Punjab Undesirable Cooperative Societies (Dissolution) Ordinance (XXXI of 1992), Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 Read More... |
2002 PTD 397 85 TAX 32 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD Vs COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Interest paid on borrowed capital payment of electricity bills |
Interest earned on delayed payment of electricity bills---Interest paid on borrowed capital---Deduction of interest Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Supreme Court (AJ&K) | 2002 |
Messrs QURESHI VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX arid 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 135(8), 136, 137 | Appeal/ time barred |
Appeal before High Court Limitation Appeals filed after more than four years from passing of orders by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Read More... |
2002 PTD 399 85 TAX 397 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., | Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer |
Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer Certificates --- Taxability in the hands of company or registered firm --- Validity --- Amount received on encashment of FEBCs was deemed to be an income under S. 80-B (1) read with S.80 (2) (b)(b) of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 789 85 TAX 112 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi Vs Bakhat Zaman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More... |
2002 PTD 794 85 TAX 1 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi Vs Bakhat Zaman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More... |
2002 PTD 789 85 TAX 112 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED Vs INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 | Best judgment assessment |
Books of account were neither denied nor produced Assessing Officer’s guess work was neither honest nor he relied upon the past history Read More... |
2002 PTD 407 86 TAX 117 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Shaukat Amin, F.C.A. Vs Muhammad Asif; D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Ss. 156, 14(1) & Second Sched ., cl. (129) --- C.B.R Circular No.20, dated 8-10-1998 --- Rectification application --- Calculation of export rebate --- Inclusion of wealth tax for determining the total income for purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 794 85 TAX 1 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED Vs INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 | Trading account Rejection |
Refection of accounts Trading account Rejection of claim of profit and loss expenses on account of its being disproportionate to the quantum Read More... |
2002 PTD 407 86 TAX 117 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs ABDUL HAMID |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 15(c), 19 & 136(1), 19 | Income from house property |
Income from “ house property” --- Shop purchased by assesse was being used by his son for business --- Assessee did not disclose income from shop , but Assessing Officer added rental value thereof in his business income --- Read More... |
2002 PTD 798 85 TAX 258 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-II, KARACHI Vs Messrs SINDH ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, First Sched.,B(1), 136(2), 65(1)(a)(b), 136 | Re-opening of assessment / Public company |
Re-opening of assessment Assessee was initially assessed as public company entitled to 5% rebate of super tax Subsequently, it transpired Read More... |
2002 PTD 419 85 TAX 386 2002 SCMR 527 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Tax Amnesty. Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), Para. 10(3) ---Words "issued" and "received" in para. 10(3), Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000---Connotation---Word "issued"used in para. 10(3) of the Scheme with respect to Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
Messrs PRIME DAIRIES ICE CREAM LTD., LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 137 | Appeal to Supreme Court |
Petition to High Court for declaring the case fit for appeal to Supreme Court Essentials Such petition must contain all the grounds on which such certificate is sought Being an important document, which has to be ultimately treated as Read More... |
2002 PTD 430 85 TAX 509 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), paras. 8 & 10---C.B.R. Circular No.9 of 2000, dated 31-5-2000, para. 2(c)---C.B.R. Circular No.1 of 2001, dated 29-2-2001, para. 2---Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963), Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD IMRAN KHAN Vs SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 73, 73(3), 138, 73 | Liability of successor |
Succession to business, otherwise than on death Assessment in the name of predecessor Validity Assessment in the name of predecessor was invalid, where the business was carried on by the successor and Return for that very year was also Read More... |
2002 PTD 435 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Constitutional petitions challenging. orders of rejection of declarations filed under Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000-Department's objection was that impugned orders were open to appeal under S. 129 of the Ordinance, thus, Constitutional Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE Vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d) | Independent approvals of the IAC |
Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), S.4 (2D) Addition Value of property-- Approval of I.A.C. Two separate and independent approvals of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 439 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Interpretation of statue |
No provision of a statute should be considered in isolation, until and unless any section/provision thereof is a complete code in itself Any Scheme contained in a statute or subordinate legislation should be considered in totality of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
DEANS ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED Vs INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE NO.1, COMPANY ZONE I, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A | Show-cause notice/ Constitutional petition |
Constitutional petition show-cause notice When Constitutional petition and show cause notice were put in just a position, then it brings the Read More... |
2002 PTD 441 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Mrs. ADEEBA EHSAN Vs INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE and 3 others |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xii), 17B | Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order |
Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order Assessment year 1991-92 Validity Section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 enacted Read More... |
2002 PTD 453 87 TAX 32 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2002 |
Messrs POLY PACK (PVT.) LIMITED Vs SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 2(3)(ii), 9(ii)(a) | Non-payment of refund |
Refund to assessee---Maladministration---Department's action of "deliberate withholding or non-payment of refund" was based on irrelevant grounds which fell under the definition of 'maladministration' as per S.2(3)(ii) of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Read More... |
2002 PTD 824 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Asif Bhatti, I.T.P. Vs Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134(6), 66A | Interim order is part/ Judicial system |
Interim order Interim order is part of working of judicial system and for that purpose no separate or specific provision is necessary to empower a Court to issue an Interim order Even in the absence of any such specific provision, a Read More... |
2002 PTD 458 85 TAX 11 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
M. A. Hadi, F.C.A. Vs Anwar Ali Shah, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66‑A | National Tax Number |
Deemed income---If an assessee was able to prove that the amount paid by him was through cross cheque the other requirements i.e. to intimate the National Tax Number were not to be invoked---Language of relevant law is disjunctive and not Read More... |
2002 PTD 827 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE Vs Messrs JINNAH CADET SCHOOL, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 | Admission of additional evidence |
Reference to High Court Admission of additional evidence Nothing had been brought on record to show that objection against the admission of Read More... |
2002 PTD 462 85 TAX 489 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
M. A. Hadi, F.C.A. Vs Anwar Ali Shah, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66 | National Tax Number |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner's order---Deemed income---Share deposit money was received through cross cheque---Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the order of Assessing Officer on Read More... |
2002 PTD 827 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE Vs Messrs NIRALA (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) | Question of fact |
Reference to High Court /Question of fact --- Question whether the assessee was a manufacture Read More... |
2002 PTD 464 85 TAX 467 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs S. SANKARAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271, 271(1)(c) | Concealment of Income |
Concealment of Income ----Mere addition to Income at the instance of assessee would not warrant a finding of concealment of Income Penalty cannot be levied under S.271 (1)(c) --- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 ,S.271(1) (c) |
2002 PTD 831 241 ITR 825 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
E.M.E. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. through Secretary
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(b) | Cooperative Society/ Companies |
Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925), Preamble/Company/Status of Cooperative Society/Societies registered under the provisions of Read More... |
2002 PTD 466 85 TAX 491 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs MATHURANTAKAM COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Business Expenditure / Disallowance |
Business---Expenditure---Disallowance---Expenditure on maintenance of residential accommodation in the nature of a guest house---Effect of S.37(4)---Section 37(4), would cover expenditure on purchase of provisions for giving refreshments Read More... |
2002 PTD 833 241 ITR 817 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
SHREE NIKETAN Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 24 | Property/ Unrealised rent |
---Property --- Deduction --- Unrealised rent ---Institution of legal proceedings against tenant is sufficient---No obligation on assessee to prove decree Notice to tenant to vacate in March, 1972---Suit instituted during previous year. relevant to assessment year Read More... |
2002 PTD 841 82 TAX 336 241 ITR 355 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 19, 20, X1(1) , 154 | Banking company/ Interest on securities |
Rectification of mistake--Purchase and sale of securities in course of business of banking---Securities held as stock-in-trade---Interest paid for broken period on purchase of securities---Deductible as business. |
2002 PTD 848 82 TAX 384 241 ITR 374 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others Vs Messrs MICRO PAK (PVT.). LIMITED and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18) | Share deposit money |
Share deposit money---Deeming such sums as "loan" or "advance"---Show-cause notices were issued to assessees on the point that introduction of "share deposit money" over and above the authorised capital otherwise than by crossed cheques Read More... |
2002 PTD 877 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 20(2) | Valuation of property |
Valuation of Read More... |
2002 PTD 882 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs DOONGAJI & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 | Association for promoting the game of cricket |
-Assessee---Association registered under Bombay Public Trusts Act/Granted certificate under S.80G of Income Tax Act as established for Read More... |
2002 PTD 512 250 ITR 750 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs NOVELTY JEWELLERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263 | Items not subject-matter of issue before Commissioner |
Revision---Assessment pursuant to order in revision/Assessing Officer/Whether can make addition of items not subject-matter of issue before Read More... |
2002 PTD 521 250 ITR 781 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs CHOHAN FLYING COACH SERVICES |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 65, 65(2) | Definite information/ reopening of assessment |
Test to determine definite nature of information---Requirements of S.65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.The phrase "definite information" refers to the information, which is sine qua non for the purpose of re-opening. That information Read More... |
2002 PTD 951 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
INCOME-TAX OFFICER and another Vs K.L. SRIHARI (HUF) and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 215 | Reassessment/ Interest for delay in filing return |
Reassessment/Fresh order of assessment of entire income of assessee/Effect/Original assessment order gets effaced/Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2002 PTD 522 250 ITR 193 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Khaliq Khatri Vs Fahimul Haque, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24 | Deduction/ Office expenses |
Head Office expenses----Assessee a non-resident company----Assessee claimed Head Office expenses in the computation chart and not in the profit and loss account---Admissibility----Assessee was not entitled to claim Head Office expenses Read More... |
2002 PTD 1029 85 TAX 202 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD. Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) | Deduction of tax at source |
Assessee in default---Show-cause notice for recovery of advance income-tax not deducted at source---Failure to identify the names of the parties Read More... |
2002 PTD 1 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD. Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) | Fiscal statute---Interpretation |
Fiscal statute has to be construed in its true perspective and in respect of payment of tax, if it is found due, against a part, then such Read More... |
2002 PTD 1 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | workers’ welfare fund |
---Welfare fund, levy of---Assessing Officer---Jurisdiction---Assessing Officer under S.4 of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs D. RAMASAMY REDDIAR (DECEASED) and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271(1)(c) , 274. | Penalty proceedings |
Concealment of income/Law applicable/Jurisdiction to levy penalty/Penalty proceedings pending before IAC on 31-3-1976/-Effect of omission of subsection (2) of S.274 with effect from 1/1976/-IAC competent to continue with proceedings and Read More... |
2002 PTD 1038 241 ITR 361 82 TAX 280 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of workers’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs N. SWAMY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income from undisclosed sources |
Income from undisclosed sources--Addition due to difference between value of stock as recorded in books and as found in declaration to bank for getting overdraft/Burden of proof on Revenue/-Could not be discharged by merely referring to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1040 82 TAX 282 241 ITR 363 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of Workers’ Welfare Fund on income exempted under the Sched. II of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Counsel for the assessee conceded Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs N. SWAMY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal |
Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal-----Question of fact---The assessee’s income is to be assessed by the Income-tax Officer on the basis of the material which is required to be considered for the purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1040 82 TAX 282 241 ITR 363 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of Workers’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs P.A.C. RAMASAMY RAJA EDUCATION CHARITY TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11, 256 (2) | Charitable purposes |
Charitable purposes/Finding that income of trust had been accumulated and that balance had been applied for charitable purposes/Tribunal was justified in granting exemption to charitable trust/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1044 82 TAX 444 241 ITR 416 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs JOHNY JOSEPH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 23 | Property Annual letting value |
Annual letting value/Basis for determination/Law applicable/-Effect of amendment of S.23 in 1975/-Actual rent will be deemed to be annual value if it is in excess of sum for which property might reasonably be expected to be let/-Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1049 82 TAX 462 241 ITR 423 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 | Property/Let out to an associate |
Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More... |
2002 PTD 1052 82 TAX 459 241 ITR 420 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Duties/ obligations |
---Duties/obligations Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 | Property/Let out to an associate |
Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More... |
2002 PTD 1052 82 TAX 459 241 ITR 420 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs HAMEED MASOOD LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE; LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136(2) | Rejection of accounts |
Constitutional Read More... |
2002 PTD 41 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2002 |
G.M. BREWERIES LTD. and another Vs UNION OF INDIA and others |
Income Tax Ordinance 131 | Inquiry/ Powers of Income Tax Authorities |
/Powers of Income Tax Authorities under S.131/Condition precedent for exercise of power/Proceedings under Income-Tax Act must be pending/No pending proceedings/No application of mind by ITO/Notice under S.131 was not valid/Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1055 82 TAX 603 241 ITR 446 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 | Permanent establishment / Visit of the expatriates |
Permanent establishment”---Connotation---Term “permanent establishment” denotes a branch, management, factory or other fixed Read More... |
2002 PTD 44 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs GOYAL GASES (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271 | Penalty Concealment of income |
-Concealment of income/Return income of about twenty five lakhs of rupees enhanced by nearly thirty eight lakhs/Tribunal deleting penalty without applying Expln. 1 to S.271(1)(c) for assessment year 1989-90/Question whether deletion of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1060 82 TAX 611 241 ITR 451 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 | Arguments |
Reference---Appeal---Argument neither raised in the grounds of appeal nor arising out of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, has no Read More... |
2002 PTD 44 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
E. PRAHALATHA BABU
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132 | Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme Delay in payment |
---Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997/Delay in payment of tax/Delay not a long one/Declarant having reasonable explanation for Read More... |
2002 PTD 1064 83 TAX 88 241 ITR 457 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Shahid Zaheer, D.R. Vs Shahid Abbas |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 23 | value of lands and buildings |
Determination of value of land and building with fixtures and fittings---Principles---Rule 8(3) of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 prescribes the Read More... |
2002 PTD 54 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs KASTHURI & SONS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
Interest on borrowed capital/Assessee borrowing money for purpose of setting up a printing facsimile unit/-Interest paid allowable as revenue expenditure/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2002 PTD 1070 241 ITR 412 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally Vs Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Economic Reforms Act/ Foreign currency account |
Foreign currency account in Pakistan---Exemption---allowed in respect of foreign currency account in Pakistan from the charge of wealth tax by Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Pronote providing for payment interest |
Income/Pronote seized during search operations/-Pronote providing for payment interest/-Evidence from books of account of M that such interest had been paid to assessee/-Interest was assessable as income of assessee/Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1072 241 ITR 464 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally Vs Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts |
Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts---Intention of Legislature---By enacting subsection (2) of S.5, Protection of Economic Reforms Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | payment of interest |
Held, that the pronote stipulated payment of interest. The entries in the account books of M in the normal course of business revealed the payment of interest of Rs.67,790 to the assessee-company. The mere fact that the correct Read More... |
2002 PTD 1072 241 ITR 464 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally Vs Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Interpretation of statutes/ favour of the assessee. |
---Fiscal statutes to be strictly interpreted and in case of substantial deficiencies in the wordings, such statute is to be interpreted Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
VOLTAS LTD. (formerly Hyderabad Allwayn Ltd.)
Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Delay/to be condoned |
Delay of 26 days in filing application---Section 256 allows condonation of delay up to 30 days after time limit/Provision for condonation of delay to be liberally construed/Finding that delay was due to mistake of counsel/Delay condoned/-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1076 82 TAX 593 241 ITR 471 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally Vs Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Registration of firms |
“The amendment made in subsection (1) clarifies that the instrument of partnership shall be in writing. Subsection (4) has also been Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs KARNATAKA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 | Cooperative society/Special deduction |
Cooperative society/Special deduction/Scope of Cooperative society engaged in banking business/Interest arising from investment made out of reserve fund to enable it to carry on banking business/-Is income from banking Read More... |
2002 PTD 1079 251 ITR 194 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
K.P. MADHUSUDHANAN
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 143, 271 | Penalty Concealment of income |
Deemed concealment under Explanation/Notice for imposition of penalty--Specific reference to Explanation dealing with deemed concealment not necessary/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.271(1)(c). Expln. 1. cl. (B)-[ CIT, v. P.M. Shah (1993) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1082 251 ITR 99 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
INCOME TAX OFFICER
Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(7), (28A), 194A, 201, 240, 244(lA), (3) & 244A. | Interest paid to buyers for period of delay |
Development Authority constructing flats and allotting them to buyers/Interest paid to buyers for period of delay/Failure to deduct tax at source/Notice of demand for tax and recovery.--Development Authority an "assessee"- Appellate Read More... |
2002 PTD 1088 251 ITR 772 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
KHODEY BREWING AND DISTILLING INDUSTRIES LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Income-tax | Interest/Delay in filing return |
Interest----Delay in filing return----Deficiency in paying advance tax-----Assessment order Direction for charging interest for delay and Read More... |
2002 PTD 524 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs STELLER INVESTMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (2) | Black money into white |
Subscribed capital/Increase/Tribunal finding not a device for converting black money into white with the being of investment company/No question of law arises -Indian Income Tu Act, 1961, S.256(2). |
2002 PTD 1094 261 ITR 263 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
GANGABAI CHARITIES Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth tax | Exemption/ Charitable trust |
Purpose not confined to religious or chartiable use----Property could be used for social, cultural and allied purposes at sole discretion of Read More... |
2002 PTD 526 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs RAJARAM MAIZE PRODUCTS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28 | Subsidy to new industries |
The respondent-firm, which manufactured starch, liquid glucose and cattle feed, started a new unit for manufacture and sale of dextro mono hydrate. It received power subsidy from the State of M.P. under a scheme whereunder subsidy was Read More... |
2002 PTD 1095 251 ITR 427 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
M.R.M. PLANTATIONS (P) LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104 | Company/ Undistributed profits |
Undistributed profits----Additional tax----Investment company---sale of house properties and rubber plantation----Profits from sale brought Read More... |
2002 PTD 527 250 ITR 521 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
STAR PAPER MILLS LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Tax deduction |
Business expenditure--Royalty payable to State Government-State > Government having unilateral power to fix royalty:-Dispute regarding enhancement of royalty and lack of entry in accounts-Not relevant Enhanced royalty is a Read More... |
2002 PTD 1096 252 ITR 337 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MIAN CONTRACTORS, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , (2) | gross receipts of the contractor |
Reference to High Court----Question of law----Amount deducted by the Highway Department out of total contract receipt on account of supply of Read More... |
2002 PTD 529 (2001)84 TAX 493 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SRI RAMDAS MOTOR TRANSPORT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132, 256 | Search and seizure |
Search and seizure/Law applicable/Explanation added with effect from April 1, 1989, enabling examination of person not merely in respect of books, documents or assets found in premises searched/Whether applicable where search conducted Read More... |
2002 PTD 1104 251 ITR 428 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zia Haider Rizvi Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A(IA), 62, 135 | Cancellation of assessment |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Issue whether the Read More... |
2002 PTD 99 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Haji MEHR DIN Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 14 | Additional ground |
Grounds which may be taken in appeal----Additional ground----Appellate Tribunal refused to entertain the additional ground for the reason Read More... |
2002 PTD 541 84 TAX 471 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
MEHSANAN DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD Vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 | Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves |
Cooperative society/Special deduction-Cooperative society engaged in banking business Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves Income from hiring safe deposit vaults-Deductible/ Interest from utilization of voluntary reserves Deductible if funds Read More... |
2002 PTD 1106 251 ITR 522 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif Vs Muhammad Iqbal Khawaja and Faisal Iqbal Khawaja, C.A. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80D | Turnover tax/ Reserve in balance-sheet |
Turnover tax----Provision for taxation----Reserve in balance-sheet-----Determination----Amount of provision for taxation to be correctly Read More... |
2002 PTD 546 84 TAX 248 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
ARIF NIZAMI
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66-A, 59, 59-A, 62, 63, 64, 129 , 134 | Constitutional petition maintainability |
Constitutional petition---Maintainability--Show-cause notice under S.66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for re-opening of return filed under Self-Assessment Scheme-Contention of assessee was that after filing such return, Authority Read More... |
2002 PTD 1185 85 TAX 330 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Fareed Vs Inayatullah Kashani, D.R. |
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 54, 66A, 59(1), 134 | Short payment of tax |
Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner's order-Universal Self-Assessment Scheme Assessment year 1999-2000-Short payment of tax-Loss of Revenue Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the assessment order passed under S 59(1) of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1186 85 TAX 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Agha Hidayatullah, D.R. Vs Makhdoom Hasamul Haq |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null | Conversion of agricultural land / Sikni-Residential |
Status of land-Conversion of status of land-Conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural Sikni-Residential land-Entries in record of rights/Form VII or Form I-Valuation-Land declared as agricultural land was in the process of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1192 85 TAX 193 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Nemo Vs Assessee |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23(1), 30, 80-D, Second Sched., Cl. (118-D) | Interest income |
Interest income earned by the company did not constitute the company’s business income and no expenses, therefore, were allowable under Read More... |
2002 PTD 107 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others Vs GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. | Golden Handshake Scheme |
Central Board of Revenue Read More... |
2002 PTD 562 (2002)85 TAX 332 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD INAYATULLAH CHEEMA
Vs Sardar ALI RAZA MASOOD QAZILBASH |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129,134, 55, 61 | Constitutional petition/appeal pending |
Assessee filed return of total income and after providing further information in response to notice issued under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer--Assessee challenged assessment order Read More... |
2002 PTD 1195 86 TAX 241 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others Vs GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. | Golden Handshake/ Deduction of tax/legal fiction |
Central Board of Revenue Circular No.15 of 1997, dated 16-11-1997 Payments made to employees under Golden Handshake Scheme/Deduction of tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 562 (2002)85 TAX 332 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) | Finding of Tribunal |
Reference/appeal Maintainability -Finding of Tribunal was primarily based on the appreciation of as Observation of Tribunal in respect of applicability of S13(a) of the Income Tax Ordinance. 1979 were in accordance with law-No Read More... |
2002 PTD 1197 86 TAX 224 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ATEED RIAZ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) | Rectification of order |
Rectification of Read More... |
2002 PTD 570 (2002)86 TAX 130 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) | Partial deductions/ Various recipients |
Reference Question of law Requirement-Authority found the assessee-company to have withheld Tax at a lesser you from its dealers Tribunal was of the view that Department had made credit in the cases of recipients to the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1197 86 TAX 224 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ATEED RIAZ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) | Reference to High Court/Limitation |
Tribunal Passed order under S.135 of the Ordinance on 21-9-2000/No reference application under S.136(1) in respect of any question of law Read More... |
2002 PTD 570 (2002)86 TAX 130 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
GHAFFAR HUSSAIN
Vs REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EASTERN REGION), LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 157, 157(2)(a) (iv), 157(3)(a) | Authorized representative | Advocate |
Authorized representative of assesse--Scope Legal practitioner entitled to practice in any Civil Court in Pakistan is included among, the authorized representatives under the provision of S.157(2)(a) (iv) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1205 86 TAX 239 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MUSLIM INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COYS. III, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 26(a), First Sched, Fourth Sched., 5 | Insurance company/Income from dividend |
Insurance company/General insurance business/Income from dividend and NIT Units in assessment year 1992-93/Chargeability to tax/-Special Read More... |
2002 PTD 577 (2002)85 TAX 273 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs CRESCENT ART FABRICS (PVT.) LTD
Vs INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 , 136(1) | Withdrawal of Reference/ Constitutional petition |
Constitutional petition-Petition filed after withdrawal of reference- Maintainability Re-opening of assessment---After having been un successful before the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee preferred Income Tax Reference before High Read More... |
2002 PTD 1206 87 TAX 222 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mian Mukhtar, I.T.P. Vs Agha Hadayatullah, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 2(16), 2(24), 3, 7, Second Sched., 8(3), | Rental income/ Exemption for self-occupied |
C.B.R. Circular No. 11 of 1994, Read More... |
2002 PTD 586 85 TAX 232 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI
Vs Mst. SHAKEELA BANO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 61, 135, 136(1) | Service of notice on assessee |
Scope Question of law not raised before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Effect Dispute was with regard to service of notice on assessee under S.56 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Tribunal having found that the notice was never served upon the assessee, dismissed the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1209 87 TAX 304 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Aslam Anwar Vs Abdul Jaleel, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(1)(16)(ii) | Interpretations/favor of assessee |
Principle that "where two equally Read More... |
2002 PTD 598 85 TAX 171 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
Smt. TAPATIPAL
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 159, 271(1)(c)., 254 | Deemed assessee |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-Powers of Tribunal--Power to remand New plea raised for first time before Tribunal in penalty proceedings that assessee was ill during relevant period---Tribunal justified in remanding matter to Assessing Read More... |
2002 PTD 1216 82 TAX 589 241 ITR 468 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) | expenses of advertising and sales promotion |
Disallowance of expenses with reference to R.33 of Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976---Validity---Rule 33 of the Drugs Read More... |
2002 PTD 117 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs NAGI REDDI CHARITIES |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(24), 11, 12, 13, 13(1)(bb) | Exemption/Charitable purpose |
Exemption-Charitable purpose---Charitable trust-Copyrights in films assigned to trust subject to distribution arrangements made by donors prior to such assignment-Monies received by trust under assignment directed specifically to be held Read More... |
2002 PTD 1220 83 TAX 92 241 ITR 431 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) | Allowances paid to medical representatives |
Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976, R.33---Reference to High Court---Question whether Tribunal was justified to confirm Read More... |
2002 PTD 117 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
SHARADA PULLELA Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 273A | Penalty Waiver or reduction of penalty |
Penalty Interest Waiver or reduction of penalty or interest Commissioner of Income-tax must decide application for such waiver or rejection on merits Rejection of application without application of mind is not valid Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1225 82 TAX 595 241 ITR 473 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
S.V. MUZUMDAR Vs TAX RECOVERY OFFICER And Others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 | Purchase of property attached by dept. |
Recovery of tax Writ Attachment and sale of property Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale Writ would not issue to quash order Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. 85 Constitution Read More... |
||
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mohiuddin Siddiqui Vs Ghulam, Appraiser |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Order of the Larger Bench |
Contradictions between order of Division Bench and Larger Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of valuation of property---Order of Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
S.V. MUZUMDAR
Vs TAX RECOVERY OFFICER and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 | Purchase of property attached by dept. |
Recovery of tax-Writ-Attachment and sale of property--Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale--- Writ would not issue to quash order-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. Read More... |
2002 PTD 1229 241 ITR 481 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs CAVALRY SUPER STORE
Vs THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1, ZONE, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 | Assessment/ infructuous |
Constitutional petition---Re-opening of assessment---During the pendency of Constitutional petition assessment order had already been passed by Read More... |
2002 PTD 133 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2002 |
NATIONAL LEATHER CLOTH MANUFACTURING CO
Vs INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 148 | Reassessment Scientific research |
Reassessment Scientific research Donation to approved institution for scientific research-Claim for deduction under S.35(1)(ii) granted Withdrawal of approval with retrospective effect to institution to which donation was granted Read More... |
2002 PTD 1230 241 ITR 482 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Sameera Yasia, D.R. Vs Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 | inherited properties |
Inclusion of value in net wealth of inherited properties under litigation for partition and possession---Assessee showed only his share in the Read More... |
2002 PTD 134 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
CHANDRA MOHAN
Vs UNION OF INDIA and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 140, 240 | Refund/Amount paid as tax could not be refunded.. |
Refund-Section 240 would apply only where refund becomes due as a result of an order passed in appeal or other proceeding under Indian Income- tax Act--Return filed and tax paid by assessee-No order of assessment within period of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1233 82 TAX 465 241 ITR 484 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Sameera Yasia, D.R. Vs Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 | Interpretation of statutes/ hardship and harshness |
Plea of hardship and harshness cannot provide justification for ignoring the law as enacted by the Legislature---When a law enacted by the Read More... |
2002 PTD 134 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs RAJAPALAYAM MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32 | Depreciation |
Actual cost Subsidy Not liable to be reduced from actual cost of assets for determination of depreciation Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Held, that the assessment orders allowing depreciation without reducing the SIPCOT subsidy Read More... |
2002 PTD 1239 82 TAX 472 241 ITR 492 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Akhtar Hussain Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66A , 59A | House building advance |
Applicability of S.66A, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Inspecting Additional Commissioner could always probe into the matter and judge the Read More... |
2002 PTD 141 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs CURRENCY INVESTMENT CO. LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Business loss |
Loss on account of dealing in shares/Identity of purchaser and seller not disputed/Failure to produce broker through whom shares were sold Read More... |
2002 PTD 1241 82 TAX 474 241 ITR 494 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Assessee in default |
Assessee in default---On failure to make deduction at source the payer becomes an assessee in default to the extent of that much amount which Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
OCEANIC PRODUCTS EXPORTING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 68 | Cash credits Burden of proof |
Cash credits/Effect of S.68/Burden of proof/Burden on assessee to prove source of credits and credit worthiness of lenders/Alleged creditors fishermen who were not capable of lending substantial amounts/Finding by Tribunal that cash Read More... |
2002 PTD 1244 82 TAX 477 241 ITR 497 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Notice of monitoring tax deductions |
Notice of assessee demanding challan of payment under S.50 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer having the jurisdiction Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R. Vs Riffat Hussain Malik |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 108(b), , 139 , 142 | Penalty/ No serious prejudice |
Jurisdiction of tax Recovery Read More... |
2002 PTD 616 (2002)85 TAX 153 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
M. S. P. SENTHIL KUMAR
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147 | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Remand/Order of remand final unless challenged through appropriate proceedings/Reassessment/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of Income-tax Officer to reopen assessment under S.147(b) and restoring matter to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1248 82 TAX 481 241 ITR 502 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Concurrent jurisdiction |
Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authority---Deduction of tax Authorities---Current jurisdiction not-barred---No bar is contained under S.5 of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalid Maqbool for Appellant (in I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001). Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. for Respondent (in, I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001). |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134, 8 | Appeal Tribunal/ Filing of appeal by the Dept. |
Issuance of Certificate of pendency of departmental appeal before filling of appeal --- Effect--- Filing of appeal by the Department Read More... |
2002 PTD 625 (2002)85 TAX 68 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
Smt. GOWRI RAJES and others Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 254 | Question concluded/ cannot be re-agitated |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Question concluded by earlier order of Tribunal cannot be re-agitated/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of ITO to reopen assessment under S,147(b) and directing the Assessing Officer to make fresh assessment/No Read More... |
2002 PTD 1252 82 TAX 484 241 ITR 506 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed Vs Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | Liability / law was repealed/omitted |
Where liability of the assessee was created under a law when that was in force during the assessment year under consideration such liability Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE Vs LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. | Income was exempt from levy of tax |
Assessee declared nil income in assessment years 1976-77 to 1983-84--- Assessing Officer rejected assessee’s claim that its Income was Read More... |
2002 PTD 629 (2002)85 TAX 25 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
Capital or revenue expenditure/Tribunal finding that expenditure had been incurred to maintain and preserve asset/Tribunal justified in holding that expenditure was revenue in nature/No question of law arose, from its order/Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1255 82 TAX 487 241 ITR 509 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed Vs Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | law repealed/omitted/ tax liability |
Rights and liabilities accrued and created under a provision of law cannot be taken away when that law is repealed/omitted subsequently. Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE Vs LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. | Registration of firm |
Registration of firm-Refusal of registration/Order under S.68(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was not merely for granting of Read More... |
2002 PTD 629 (2002)85 TAX 25 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SIMCO METERS LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 | Revision |
Revision / Appeal/Powers of CIT/CIT can revise matter not agitated in appeal/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1258 82 TAX 490 241 ITR 511 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed Vs Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | Deemed income/ Loan |
Deemed income---Loan---Assessment year 1995-96---Assessee failed to repay loan within five year by 30-6-1994---Such loan was assessed as Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Aslam; D.R. Vs Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 68(4), 68, 69, (5), 59 | Self-assessment/immunity from special audit. |
C.B.R Circular No. 5 of 1997, dated 12-7-1997 --- C.B.R. Circular No. 12 of Read More... |
2002 PTD 639 (2002)85 TAX 102 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SIMCO METERS LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 | investment allowance |
Revision/Appeal to Appellate Tribunal- Manufacture of electric meters/Order withdrawing investment allowance in revision proceedings/Tribunal erroneously setting aside order of revision on ground of jurisdiction/Matter remanded to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1258 82 TAX 490 241 ITR 511 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 52, 86, 2(6)(43) | Failing to deduct or pay tax |
Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Additional tax---Refund---Adjustment of---Tax payable under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 166 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mian Muhammad Azeem Vs Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A , 59A | Assessment on the basis of return |
Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order/ Assessment on the basis of return / Self Assessment Scheme / Non Filling of wealth Read More... |
2002 PTD 650 (2002)85 TAX 148 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
BALASUBRAMANIA FOUNDRY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40 | Fuel surcharge for power consumption |
Business expenditure/Accounting/Liability in respect of additional fuel surcharge for power consumption/Assessee following mercantile system accounting/Agreement between assesssee and Electricity Board that fuel surcharge would form part Read More... |
2002 PTD 1267 241 ITR 523 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Anwar-ul-Haq, D.R. Vs Sh. Sharif Hussain |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 14, 14(2), 16, 17, 17(1)(b), 16(5) | Wealth escaping assessment/ Limitation Notice |
Wealth escaping assessment---Limitation---Notice under S.17(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 could be issued within a period of 5 years from the Read More... |
2002 PTD 168 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUNDARYA NURSERY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(1) | Gratuity |
Gratuity/Conditions laid down in S.40A (7) must be fulfilled in order to claim deduction/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A.The assessee is not entitled to the deduction of the provision made towards the gratuity liability without Read More... |
2002 PTD 1270 82 TAX 499 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
AL-WARIS TRADERS
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance and Ex-Officio Chairman, C.B.R., Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(7-A), 80-C & 162 | Advance income-tax |
Suit for declaration and permanent injunction-Payment of advance income-tax---Plaintiff had sought declaration to the effect that he was not Read More... |
2002 PTD 173 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 | Agricultural income |
Agricultural income/Income from nurseries/Income from sale of plants grown in pots/Income from sale of seeds/Agricultural income/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.2(1). |
2002 PTD 1274 242 ITR 708 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 | Non-Resident/occasional Shipping business |
Representative assessee/Reassessment/Scope of S.172/Difference between agent of master of ship and agent of non-resident principal/Effect of amendment of S.172 with effect from 1-6-1975/Return filed and assessment under S.172 in Read More... |
2002 PTD 1274 242 ITR 708 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Tahir, I.T.P. Vs Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, | Definite information |
Information received by the Assessing Officer about discount, after the original assessment is a “definite information”. Read More... |
2002 PTD 183 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Tahir, I.T.P. Vs Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, | Rectification of mistake/Appeal before Appellate Tribunal |
Appeal before Appellate Tribunal---Argument in respect of rectification made by First Appellate Authority---Validity---Argument that original Read More... |
2002 PTD 183 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Shahid Abbas for Appellant. Vs Muhammad Asif; D.R. for Respondent |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 12(1) | House-Exemption |
Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer's order Exemption--House-Exemption allowed of one self-occupied house at Lahore was cancelled by Read More... |
2002 PTD 676 85 TAX 168 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUTHERN EXPLOSIVES CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 263 | Income/ Sales Tax collected from customers |
Income-Sales Tax collected from customers--Liability regarding part of amount disputed before sales tax authorities and assessee treating that part as a deposit/Amount treated as deposit was part of t liability and was a trading Read More... |
2002 PTD 1285 242 ITR 107 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) | Advance income-tax/ full and final discharge |
Filing of return---Scope---Person who is an importer and has no other source of income and has paid the tax under the provisions of S.50(5) of Read More... |
2002 PTD 187 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Constitutional petition/ alternate remedy not efficacious |
Constitutional petition --- Failure to avail revisional remedy --- Effect --- Availability of revisional remedy is not fatal to Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs HARYANA MINERALS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 145, 256 | Valuation of stock |
Change in method of valuation of stock-Finding by Tribunal that change was bona fide and changed method was followed regularly in succeeding Read More... |
2002 PTD 1291 242 ITR 704 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) | Presumptive tax regime |
Deduction of tax at source---Opting for presumptive tax regime---Filing of irrevocable declaration---Effect---Filing of such declaration opting Read More... |
2002 PTD 187 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Discretion-Administrative decision |
Discretion-Administrative Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs JANMABHOOMI PRESS TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 | Charitable trust/ Borrowed funds |
Charitable trust--Exemption/Borrowed funds utilised in construction of building which would augment income of trust/Repayment of debt amounted to application of income for charitable purposes--Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. |
2002 PTD 1293 242 ITR 709 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Saiyed Saeed Ashhad and Abdul Ghani Shaikh, JJ Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65(1)(a)(b) | Re-opening of assessment / Definite information |
Re-opening of Read More... |
2002 PTD 191 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interim relief |
Appellate Authority--Power to grant interim relief Authority having power to grant final relief has the ancillary or incidental power to Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | Business expenditure / Exemption Director |
Business expenditure--Ceiling on expenditure Exemption Director of company a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6)(viia)---Amount exempt under S. 10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs BE BE JAN PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED, FAISALABAD
Vs THE I.A.C. Or INCOME TAX OF COMPANIES RANGE VI, FAISALABAD and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 | Re-opening of assessment/ Show-cause notice |
Re-opening of assessment on the basis of second show-cause notice on another aspect of assessment---Validity---Earlier is a show-cause notice was Read More... |
2002 PTD 208 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Petition/ Maintainability |
Petition---Maintainability-Where impugned action is completely without jurisdiction or illegal and no immediate departmental remedy is Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | Business expenditure/ Surtax |
Business expenditure---Company-Surtax paid by assessee not to be deducted while computing total income under Income-tax Act--Indian Companies (Profits) Surtax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs H.I. (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE Vs INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Question of fact |
Appeal to High Court---Question of fact---Question as to whether assessee purchased an open plot or some construction was also raised thereupon Read More... |
2002 PTD 212 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interlocutory relief / Re-opening the case |
Constitutional petition--Re-opening of assessment---Interlocutory relief-Where petitioner has Challenged the very notice of re-opening the Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | determination of damages/ Not an accrued liability |
Business expenditure/Assessee entering into contracts for supply of insulators to Electricity Boards Provision for reduction in contract price by 1/2 per cent per week of contract value if assessee failed in due performance of contract Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Income from other sources/ Interest income |
Interest income---No business income---Business expenses---Set-off against interest income---No notice for discontinuation of business---First Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Presumptive tax regime/assessment |
Distinction- History, Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/Interest |
Capital or Revenue expenditure General principles---Expenditure on interior decoration of newly-constructed premises obtained on lease Revenue expenditure-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Presumptive tax regime |
Application of presumptive to regime of S. 80-C, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979--Powers of Assessing Officer-Categories to which presumptive tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | certified copies of order/cannot exclude the time |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Limitation/Effect of Explanation to R.9 of Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 Income-tax Department furnished with copy of order of CIT-Time taken to obtain certified copies of order could not be Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Stay of recovery proceedings |
Petitioner's appeal pending before Commissioner-Assessing Officer took coercive actions by freezing Bank accounts under S.92 of the Ordinance Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | capital or Revenue expenditure |
The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interim relief |
Interim relief is necessitated, where immediate urgent disposal of cases may not be possible and the delay would be detrimental to the Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | capital or Revenue expenditure |
The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Bar of suit |
Bar contained in S.162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 would not apply where recoveries were in pursuance of order which were with Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 |
Income/Interest/Loan given interest-free to sister concern--No Interest due or collected Notional amount could not be assessed on ground that interest ought to have been charged-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
||
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs MATRISEVA TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 | Charitable trust /Donation to another charitable |
Charitable purposes-Charitable trust-Exemption-Donation by assessee-trust to another charitable trust would amount to application of income for charitable purposes-Entitled to exemption-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. |
2002 PTD 1308 82 TAX 621 242 ITR 20 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Disallowance of expenditure/ Amounts paid in cash |
Amounts paid in cash in excess of specified limit---Amount paid in cash for disbursement among Lorry drivers---Payments reflected in account books---Amounts could not be disallowed---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(3)---Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Interest on borrowed capital |
Interest on borrowed capital No evidence that amounts had been borrowed for purposes of business Interest was not deductible Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Travel expenses |
Business expenditure---Travel expenses---No finding on question whether travel was for purposes of business---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Transport expenditure |
Case-1:The assessee-firm carried on the business of manufacturing, trading and export of cast iron. The assessee claimed deduction of payment of Rs.1,49,902 on transport. During the scrutiny, the Income- tax Officer found that out of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Loan free of interest to sister concern |
The assessee had claimed deduction of interest on a loan of Rs.8,60,000. The loan had been advanced immediately to a sister concern free of interest. The case of the assessee was that it was not in fact an interest free loan to P but an Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | tours for the purpose of the business |
That no details were furnished before the Income-tax Officer as to whom the partners of the firm had contacted abroad for the purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs ESCORTS EMPLOYEES ANCILLARIES LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 | Depreciation/ Actual cost |
Depreciation allowable on cost of acquisition of technical know-how---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is to be allowed on the total cost of the asset. The total cost shall Read More... |
2002 PTD 1317 83 TAX 199 242 ITR 74 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Vs 37, 45, 48, 49 & 50 |
KALI AERATED WATER WORKS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX | Capital gains/ Computation of |
Machinery obtained on dissolution of firm contributed as capital in new firm---Sale taken into account in calculating its cost--Sections 49 & 50 were not machinery---Depreciation allowed on machinery to old firm could not be applicable---Value as shown in books Read More... |
2002 PTD 1319 83 TAX 83 242 ITR 79 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/Royalty |
Capital or revenue expenditure-Royalty-Five-year agreement for provisions of technical know-how for manufacture of air-cleaners-- Royalty paid per air-cleaner manufactured---Not a payment for acquisition of capital asset---Deductible as Read More... |
2002 PTD 1324 242 ITR 2002 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Capital gains/ Business income /Sale shares |
Capital gains-Business---Business income or capital gains-Sale shares--Shares held by share broker as personal assets and included wealth tax return---Gains assessable as capital gains-Assessee to relief under S.54F-Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1324 242 ITR 2002 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SIVAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A | Depreciation Borewell Rigs |
Depreciation Special depreciation---Borewell---Rigs compressors mounted on a lorry and used for drilling borewell---Not and entitled to special depreciation at 30 per cent.---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. Read More... |
2002 PTD 1332 2002 SLD 213 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SIVAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A | Investment allowance |
Investment allowance---Borewell-Rigs and compressors used for drilling borewell---Not entitled to investment allowance---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A. |
2002 PTD 1332 2002 SLD 213 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37, 80 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/ Donation to cricket club |
Donation to cricket club---Tribunal right in holding that contribution to cricket club cannot be treated as capital in nature and directing Assessing Officer to allow it as Revenue expenditure---No question of law arose---Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1336 242 ITR 86 83 TAX 212 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs NIHAL CHAND REKYAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263, 271 | Penalty proceedings |
Revision-Commissioner-Scope powers Penalty- Commissioner directing Income-tax Officer to initiate penalty proceedings--Penalty proceedings are not part of assessment proceedings-Tribunal right in quashing direction given by Read More... |
2002 PTD 1339 82 TAX 620 242 ITR 45 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs A. SREENIVASA PAI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 139, 271 | Concealment of income Penalty |
Return Concealment of income...Scope of Expln. 1 to S. 271(1)(c) inserted with effect from 1-4-1976-Presumption of concealment where assessee offers explanation in respect of credit which Assessing Officer considers to be false Revised Read More... |
2002 PTD 1341 83 TAX 222 242 ITR 29 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Expenditure above prescribed limit |
Disallowance of expenditure above prescribed limit-Travelling expenses of employee or, "any other person"- Meaning of "any other person" in R.6D(2)--Any other person would include a Director or Managing Director---Travelling expenses of Director or Managing Director Read More... |
2002 PTD 1351 242 ITR 245 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Commission paid to employees |
Shipping agent Finding that employees canvassed for orders for their employer Extent of allowance of commission paid would depend on the facts of relevant previous year. |
2002 PTD 1351 242 ITR 245 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs GULZAR UL HAQ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) | Super Tax |
Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More... |
2002 PTD 226 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs GULZAR UL HAQ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) | Super Tax |
Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More... |
2002 PTD 226 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Additional assessment/ Revised returns |
Notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention was that assumption of jurisdiction by issuing notice under S.61 of the Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Deemed income/ Gold brought into Pakistan |
Deemed income---Gold brought into Pakistan---Personal effects---Nothing was brought on record to establish that gold brought into Pakistan was Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | World income/ Exemption |
---“World income”---Exemption---Tax payer is required to declare total world income and in case income-tax had been paid abroad, Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Younas Ghazi, F.C.A. Vs Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 55 | Failure to furnish return | Penalty |
Failure to furnish return of total income---Penalty---Penalty imposed under S.108 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for the late filing of return Read More... |
2002 PTD 237 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Lease income/ Industrial / undertaking |
Lease income---Industrial undertaking---Exemption---Lease income was not part of the profits and against derived from an industrial undertaking Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Property |
Inadmissible deduction---Add back---Deletion of---Deletion of machinery repairs add back was upheld by the Tribunal as the same had been done in Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Additional tax/ Show-cause notice |
Additional tax---Show-cause notice---Speaking order---Necessity---Additional tax cancelled by the First Appellate Authority was restored by the Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Penalty for non-compliance |
Penalty for non-compliance with notice, etc.---Cancellation of penalty, levied under S.110 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by the First Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 23(1)(vii), 30 | Borrowed capital/ Interest income/Interest payable |
Deduction---Borrowed capital---Interest income---Interest payable---Deduction whether admissible---Department taxed the amount of interest income Read More... |
2002 PTD 250 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Naeem Akhtar Sh., F.C.A. Vs Mian Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(16)(ii), 17B | Bank loan/ asset/project / Partly sold out |
Bank loan was obtained against an asset/project---Entire project was not offered for taxation having been partly sold out---Entire liabilities Read More... |
2002 PTD 252 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Asif Ali Khan, A.C.M.A. and Muhammad Irshad, I.T.P. Vs Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 66-A | Business expenditure |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Deduction---Payment made to secure the market free Read More... |
2002 PTD 257 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Yousaf Ali, I.T.P. . Vs nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 | Travel agent / Commission/ Gross receipts |
Assessee, a travel agent---Commission---Gross receipts---Sale of assets---Inspecting Additional Commissioner directed the Assessing Officer to Read More... |
2002 PTD 260 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 | Assessment, after the revision |
Assessment, after the revision, was rectified under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer---Validity---Since original Read More... |
2002 PTD 260 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 66-A,59,59(4) | Self-assessment/ Last declared/ Assessed |
Income last declared or assessed whichever is higher---Words “last declared or assessed” as used in Self-Assessment Read More... |
2002 PTD 267 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD. Vs D.C., INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) | Commission / Discount |
Gross profit rate---History of the case---Re-casting of account---Application of gross profit rate following the history of the case after Read More... |
2002 PTD 275 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD. Vs D.C., INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) | Issue raised out of First Appellate Authority’s order |
---R. Read More... |
2002 PTD 275 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A, | Order passed IAC |
C.B.R. Circular C.No.2(1) DATA-2 of 1994, dated 19-2-1994---Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioners’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 278 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Objection raised in Audit Report |
Power of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Objection raised in Audit Report---Proceedings based on Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | concept of change of opinion |
Order of the Inspecting Additional Commissioner could not be hit by the concept of change of opinion on the part of Assessing Officer as he, Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Change of opinion |
Change of opinion---Initiation of proceedings under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer and subsequently under Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE Vs MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 59, 61, 65 & 136(1) | Self-Assessment Scheme/Re-opening of case/ immunity |
Central Board of Revenue Circular No.9, dated 1-7-1993, para. 1(i) ---Appeal---Self-Assessment Scheme---Re-opening of case---Assessment under Self-Assessment Scheme was not accepted by the Income-tax Authorities and notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1560 87 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Change of opinion |
Inspecting Additional Commissioner’s direction to Assessing Officer to issue notice under S.116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Nasim Vs NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Setting off of loss incorrectly |
Order prejudicial to the interest of Revenue---Setting off of loss incorrectly---If it was found that the loss was incorrectly set off against Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Nasim Vs Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Capital gain | Stock in trade |
Capital gain---Stock in trade---Income From---Head of income-Words “held by an assessee” as used in the context of capital assets Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE Vs MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 61. 65 & 136(1) | Self-Assessment Scheme/Object and scope/ Immunity clause |
Self-Assessment Scheme---Object and scope---Immunity clause in any fiscal statute or a similar concession in the rules framed thereunder, is an expression of helplessness on the part of the Revenue to tap the pilferage---Once the helplessness is so declared in the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1560 87 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat Vs Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) | Words and Phrases |
----“Any”----Meanings----Word “any” has a diversity of meaning as may be employed to indicate “all” or Read More... |
2002 PTD 303 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat Vs Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) | Inadmissible deduction |
Inadmissible deduction-----Expression “instrument of any Kind” used in S.50(7D) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 303 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. Vs Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) R. 8(5) | Sale proceeds Addition |
Sale proceeds Addition---Addition was made on the ground that sale consideration was shown lesser than the fair market value of the assets Read More... |
2002 PTD 309 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As Vs Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B | Circular/instructions |
Circulars instructions by Central Board of Revenue of beneficial nature, are binding on the field Read More... |
2002 PTD 316 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As. Vs Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B | Remittances | Normal banking channel |
Second Sched. , Part I, Cl. 7(ii) Exemption Remittances not proved through normal banking channel Sale of Foreign Exchange Bearer Bonds No Read More... |
2002 PTD 316 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MEHTAB INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SAHIWAL through Chief Executive Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE 16, COMPANIES ZONE I, LAHORE and 3 others |
Finance Act, 1991 12,234 | Constitutional jurisdiction/ Appellate jurisdiction |
Art. 199 Constitutional jurisdiction Scope Distinct from Appellate jurisdiction Fact alone that after the order of Tribunal, assessee has no Read More... |
2002 PTD 324 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE III, LAHORE Vs Messrs MARGALA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Appeal to High Court |
Appeal to High Court Question in the nature of argument pre-supposing a finding of fact was refused to be entertained for consideration Read More... |
2002 PTD 327 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs SRINIVASA HATCHERIES (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 256 | Income Trust |
Reference Depreciation Plant Building Poultry sheds whether plant entitled to a higher rate of depreciation Question of law Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.32 & 256. Held, that the question Read More... |
2001 PTD 1416 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ABAD HOTELS INDIA (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32A | Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment |
Investment allowance/ Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment used for producing foodstuffs/ Not entitled to investment allowance as there is no production of food materials in a hotel/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A. Hotel business is not an Read More... |
2001 PTD 1764 [(2000)82 TAX 98] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 43, 43B, 142 | Income Trust |
Business expenditure Tax, duty, cess or fee Deduction only on actual payment Proviso to S. 43B clarifying that sums paid after accounting year but before due date for submission of return would be deductible Supreme Court decision in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1417 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs VAIKUNDAM RUBBER CO. LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.57 | Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits |
Other sources/ Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits/ Borrowals for agricultural purposes/ Interest paid on borrowals/ Not a charge on interest income from fixed deposits/ Not deductible/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.57. The assessee derived interest Read More... |
2001 PTD 1770 [(2000)82 TAX 112] [241 I T R 50] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs DURGA ENGINEERING AND FOUNDRY WORKS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 254(1), 254(2), 256 | Income Trust |
Reference Scope of S.256 Questions which can be referred to High Court All orders passed by Tribunal under S.254 Order of rectification passed under S. 254(2) Reference lies from such order to High Court Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. Read More... |
2001 PTD 1420 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK PLC Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 214, 220 & 246 | Levy of interest/ Interest payable by Government |
Appeal to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/ Recovery of tax/ Competency of appeal/ Levy of interest under S.220(2)/ No appeal lies against such levy/ Levy of interest by Assessing Officer while giving effect to order of Tribunal/ No Read More... |
2001 PTD 1773 [241 ITR 269] |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs FRANCO TOSI INGEGNERIA |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Business expenditure/ Commencement of business |
Business expenditure/ Commencement of business/ Assesse, a non-resident-Company/ Securing letter of intent for project in India on 13-4-1981/ Thereafter, setting up site office on 1-10-1981/ Business commenced on 13-4-1981/ Expenditure from that Read More... |
2001 PTD 1782 [241 ITR 268] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
BHARAT EARTH MOVERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Income Trust |
Business expenditure General principles Difference between accrued and contingent liabilities Amount set apart to meet liability on account of leave encashment of employees Not a contingent liability Amount is deductible Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1427 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 147(b) | Reassessment/ Information that income had escaped assessment |
Reassessment/ Information that income had escaped assessment/ Extra depreciation allowed/ Revenue audit drawing attention to relevant provision/ reopening of assessment on basis of audit report—Report of audit constituted “information”/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1784 [241 ITR 248] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) | Dictionary meanings |
Dictionary meanings, however, helpful in understanding general sense of the words cannot control where the scheme of the statute or the instrument considered as a whole clearly conveys a somewhat different shade of meaning. Words have to Read More... |
2001 PTD 1288 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16, 30 & 31 | Salary income/ Income from other sources |
Salary income/ Determination/ Condition precedent to the classification of the income under S.16 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was that the payer and the payee had the relationship of the “employer” and the “employee”. Ss.16, 30 Read More... |
2001 PTD 1794 [(2001)83 TAX 214] |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Salman Pasha Vs Zaki Ahmed |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) Ss.17-B, 16(3) & 2(5)(ii) | Valuation/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building |
Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to revise Wealth Tax Officer”s order/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building/ Portions of ground floor and first floor of said building were let out and were competed by the assesses out of the amount of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1809 83 TAX 219 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S.50(3-A) | Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation |
Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation/ Exemption/ Assesse claimed exemption, from deduction of tax from payment to non-resident on account of technical services, under double tax treaty/ Validity/ Exemption under double tax treaty Read More... |
2001 PTD 1816 (2001)83 TAX 248 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 77-A, Ss.2(29), 50 & 52 | Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax |
Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax/ Deduction of tax at source-Fee for technical services-Tax under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was levied as the assesse had not made deductions on payments in respect of technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 1816 (2001)83 TAX 248 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
FECTO BELARUS TRACTORS LIMITED Vs PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance Economic Affairs and another |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art.188/ Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI, R.1 | Review of Supreme Court judgment |
Review of Supreme Court judgment/ Rearguing the appeal at review stage/ Validity/ Distinction existed between review and rehearing and attempt to reargue the appeal at review stage was not permissible: |
2001 PTD 1829 84 TAX 25 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
null Vs null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right |
Right of appeal/ right of appeal which was available at the time of commencement of a “lis” could not be taken away except by express language. Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right/ Right of appeal is not an inherent right but it Read More... |
2001 PTD 1848 (2001)83 TAX 206 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
JANARDAN DAS Vs BINDESHWARI PRASAD SAH and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 132-A. | Search and seizure |
---Search and seizure---Search and seizure under Bihar Money Lenders’ Act---Requisition of seized assets---Scope of power under under S.132-A---Power under S.132-A---Power under S. 132-A has to be exercised immediately after property is seized by police Read More... |
2001 PTD 26 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
BRITIANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 45 & 147 | Capital gains |
---Reassessment---Capital gains---Amount of capital gains shown in return and accepted by Assessing Officer---Subsequent report by Valuation Officer that fair market Read More... |
2001 PTD 31 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
DAVENDRA PAL SINGH Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.2(e) | Agricultural land |
Exemption/ Agricultural land/ Agreement in May, 1989 to sell to developer land which had groves on it/ Purchaser authorized to cut trees/ Application for approval for development of land submitted in June, 1989 and amount paid to development authority in September, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1860 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SAROJA RAMAN and antother |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.164. S.164. | Trustee |
---Representative assesse---Trustee—Maximum marginal rate of tax--- Condition precedent---Beneficiaries or shares of beneficiaries should be indeterminate or unknown---Discretion to trustees regarding time and extent of disbursal of income to beneficiaries is Read More... |
2001 PTD 38 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs K. VIJAYAKUMAR |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Part I of Schedule I | Land and building used for business |
Additional wealth tax/ Exemption/ Land and building used for business/ Meaning of "business"/ Agricultural activity amounts to business/ Assessee carrying on agriculture and ginning factory/ Entitled to exemption from additional wealth tax/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1877 |
|
Gauhati High Court (India) | 2001 |
DIRECTOR OF STATE LOTTERIES Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2(24)(ix) & 28. | lottery tickets |
Income---Lottery--Agent in lottery tickets---Meaning of "lottery"--- Lottery implies a right to participate in draw---Agent in lottery tickets does not have right to participate in draw-Income accruing to agent in respect of prizes on Read More... |
2001 PTD 43 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
INCOME TAX OFFICER Vs SARADBHAI M. LAKHANI AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Reassessment |
Reassessment/ Information that income has escaped assessment/ -Decision of High Court would constitute information- Initiation of. Reassessment proceedings on basis of such decision is valid/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.147 (b). Held, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1879 83 TAX 160 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) | depreciation |
Rectification---Mistake apparent from the record---Powers of Appellate Tribunal---Tribunal deciding debatable issue---No decision of jurisdictional High Court on those issues---Judgment rendered by jurisdictional High Court subsequent to decision of Tribunal on such Read More... |
2001 PTD 77 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
NEW INDIA MINING CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ mining leases |
Business expenditure/ Condition precedent for deduction--Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ Assessee holding mining leases from State Government/ No expenditure towards restoration of lands to their original condition incurred by assessee/ Question Read More... |
2001 PTD 1881 84 TAX 418 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254 (2) | Depreciation |
The assessee, a registered firm, claimed set off of unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier years. There were conflicting decisions of the various High Courts on the point and the Tribunal chose to follow the decision of the Allahabad Read More... |
2001 PTD 77 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs M.C. SATYAVATHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 4(1)(a)(iv). | Assessee gifting monies to trust |
Assessee”s husband creating trust for would be son-in-law/ Assessee gifting monies to trust/ Gift absolute and not revocable/ Gifted amounts not includible in computation of net wealth of assessee--Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.4(1)(a)(iv). The Read More... |
2001 PTD 1885 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
NORTH ARCOT DISTRICT COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING SOCIETY LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) | Deficiency in stock |
---Business income---Deduction---Deficiency in stock---Loss not allowable as deduction. In the assessment year 1971-72 relevant for the accounting year ending June 30, 1970, the Income-tax Officer disallowed deduction claimed by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 81 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs M.C. SATYAVATHI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 61 | Inclusions in total income |
Total income/ Inclusions in total income/ Contributions made by assessee to trust created by her husband/ Contributions considered by High Court as gift with no power of revocation/ Interest attributable to contributions made by assessee not includible in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1885 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
Vs In re: MOOLAMATTOM ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. | Cooperative society |
---Deduction of tax at source---Cooperative society---Exemption from liability to deduct tax at source---Scope of subsection (3) of S. 194A--- Cooperative society is entitled to exemption---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2 & Read More... |
2001 PTD 84 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
PRABHAVATI B. SOLANKI Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 16 & 17A | Limitation/ Meaning of assessment |
Assessment/ Limitation/ Meaning of assessment/ Assessment includes determination of net wealth as well as computation of tax payable/ No finding on question whether computation of tax had been made before time limit/ Matter remanded/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Ss. Read More... |
2001 PTD 1887 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs S.VIJI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. | Salary |
Salary---Standard deduction---Vehicle provided by employer for official personal use---Full standard deduction cannot be claimed---Indian come Tax Act, 1961, S.16 (i). For the assessment year 1977-78, Read More... |
2001 PTD 89 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
T. RAGHURAMAN Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(viiia) | Exemption/ Growing crops |
Exemption/ Growing crops/ Entire coffee and tea bushes apart from two leaves and bud of tea bush and berries of coffee bush do not fall within expression "growing crops" for exemption under S.5(1)(viiia) of Act/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1891 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs P. GANGADHARAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.6(1)(b). | Residence |
Non-resident---Test of residence---Maintenance of dwelling house india for 182 days in relevant previous year---Assessee, member of HUF, which owned a house in India---Though assessee might have a share in house, no evidence to indicate Read More... |
2001 PTD 97 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX/ WEALTH TAX
Vs BABULAL KHINCHAND TRUST |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 21A, 11(1)(a) | Charitable trust |
Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust deed providing that if settlor left no wife or children, trust property should be applied. For such charitable purposes as may be decided upon by trustees--Deed had specifically provided for application of property for charitable Read More... |
2001 PTD 1893 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
K.SOMASUNDARAM & BROTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S .36(1)(iii) | Interest on borrowed |
Business expenditure---Interest on borrowed capital---Condition precedent for deduction---Capital must be used in business---Borrowed capital invested in executing contracts---From contract receipts, sums advanced interest free to Read More... |
2001 PTD 101 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs N. KAMATCHI AMMAL |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1A) | Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm |
Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm/ Partner entitled to exemption in respect of her share in firm/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1A). The principles relating to exemption which can be claimed by a partner of a firm Read More... |
2001 PTD 1895 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs AMALGAMATIONS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.22 & 263. | Property on rent |
---Revision---House property---Annual value---Property given on rent--- Annual value determined by Assessing Officer on the basis of actual rent in respect of one property and higher rent in respect of another party---No material too Read More... |
2001 PTD 108 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company/ If in provision for taxation advance tax paid is shown as liability it is not to be treated as liability/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D. If in the case Read More... |
2001 PTD 1899 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
V. RAMANUJAM Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income-tax Rules, 1962, Rr.40 & 117A | Advance tax |
Return---Advance tax---Interest---Waiver of interest---Application for waiver---Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard---Rejection of application without giving such an opportunity---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 113 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.21 | Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property |
Trust/ Assessment/ Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property after attaining age of twenty-five years/ Beneficiary not attaining age of twenty-five years/ Interest of beneficiary in trust property alone is includible in net wealth of beneficiary/ Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 1899 243 ITR 195 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs HINDUSTAN MALLEABLE AND FIRGINGS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Interest |
---Appeal---Interest---Appeal Not maintainable against levy of interest---Liability to interest may be challenged in appeal against assessment---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. |
2001 PTD 118 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs JAWAHAR LAL MEHRA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 | Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth |
Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was signed by him/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1904 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs MEAT OF INDIA LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Subsidy |
---Capital or revenue expenditure---Subsidy---Tests---Purpose of subsidy set up or complete a new project---Subsidy is capital receipt---Subsidy received to run business operations successfully after commencement of production---Subsidy Read More... |
2001 PTD 127 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs MADURA DEVAKOTTAI TRANSPORTS (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | loan |
----Hundi loan---Additions made as transactions were not effected through account-payee cheque---Tribunal holding that they were not Hundis though written on Hundi papers---Additions deleted---Justified---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 129 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs A.M.M.AR. LAKSHMI ACHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted equity shares |
Valuation of unquoted equity shares/ Balance-sheet/ Sales tax penalty not shown. as a liability in balance-sheet/ Company succeeding in its challenge to imposition of penalty under Sales Tax Act/ Sales tax penalty not deductible as a liability. Indian Wealth Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 1909 246 ITR 468 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Smt. KAUSHALYABAI Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Death of assessee |
--Reassessment---Death of assessee---Notice---Notice issued in the name of a person who was dead---Widow of such person participating in reassessment proceedings---Defect in notice stood automatically cured---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 141 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs GUJARAT POLYCRETE (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.43B & 256 | Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment |
Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment/ Sales tax/ CBDT issuing circular stating that if a State Government had amended its Sales Tax Act to provide that sales tax deferred under an incentive scheme would. be treated as actually paid it would satisfy Read More... |
2001 PTD 1912 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
GOUTAM ROY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. | Recovery of tax |
---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More... |
2001 PTD 143 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER.OF WEALTH TAX Vs D.R. VADERA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 | Re-assessment/ Effect of reopening of |
Reassessment/ Effect of reopening of reassessment/ Previous order of underassessment is set aside and Assessing Officer has jurisdiction and duty to levy tax on entire wealth that has escaped assessment/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S. 17. Once an assessment Read More... |
2001 PTD 1914 246 IT R 348 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
GOUTAM ROY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. | Recovery of tax |
---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More... |
2001 PTD 143 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WRALTH TAX Vs ANIL KUMAR AGGARWAL |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5 | Exemption/ House |
Wealth tax/ Exemption/ House/ Co-owner of house is entitled to exemption in respect of his share/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1917 246 ITR 93 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs BALARAMPUR CHINI MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 139(8), 215 & 246. | Capital Assets Capital Receipts |
----Capital or revenue receipt---Sugar manufacture---Expansion of plant to avail of additional free sale quota---Stipulation that surplus funds resulting to be used only to repay loans taken from financial institutions---Loans taken for Read More... |
2001 PTD 149 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 | Petition against notice without availing of remedies |
Reassessment/ Writ-Notice of reassessment/ Notice not illegal per se- Writ petition against notice Read More... |
2001 PTD 1919 246 ITR 90 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs MALIK CONSTRUCTION CO. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 256, 256(1) | Award by arbitrator |
---Capital or revenue receipt---Assessee, a contractor---Award by arbitrator of additional sums to assessee for additional work done---Interest awarded on such sums for periods prior to award and thereafter up to date of payment is revenue Read More... |
2001 PTD 154 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS |
Constitution of India Art. 226 | Petition/ Existence of alternate remedy |
Existence of alternate remedy/ Writ will not normally issue/ Constitution of India, Art. 226. The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is couched in wide terms and the existence thereof is not subject to any Read More... |
2001 PTD 1919 246 ITR 90 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
BHARATIBEN JAYANTIBHAI THAKKAR Vs TAX RECOVERY OFFICER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. null | Attachment of property |
---Recovery of tax---Attachment and sale of property---Property in name of wife of partner of defaulter-firm---Wife objecting to attachment on ground property in question acquired out of her own resources---Recovery Officer bound to Read More... |
2001 PTD 160 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted shares |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted shares/ Rule 1D has to be applied -Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D. The provisions of rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, are mandatory and the valuation of unquoted shares should be made in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1922 246 ITR 104 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs BIPIN VADILAL |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147 | Failure to disclose material facts |
Reassessment---limitation---Failure to disclose material facts--- |
2001 PTD 197 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 2(m)(ii) | Debts incurred in relation to properties |
Net Wealth/ Deductions/ Debt/ Debts incurred in relation to properties which are exempt from wealth tax/ Not deductible/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, on a bare reading shows that deduction is not to be permitted where it Read More... |
2001 PTD 1922 246 ITR 104 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs BIPIN VADILAL |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.5(2)(b). | Non-resident |
---Non-resident---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Collaboration agreement--- Lump sum payment made under agreement by Indian company American company for transfer of know-how---Did not accrue or arise in India---Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 205 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs V.R.M. VALLIAPPA CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2) | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation made for earlier valuation date could not ipso facto be applied for valuation for later years. The valuation for wealth tax purposes is required to be made as on the valuation date and a report given with regard to the value made for Read More... |
2001 PTD 1926 246 ITR 801 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER INCOME- TAX Vs DHAWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961 28 | Premises taken on rent |
----Business expenditure---Premises taken on rent---Agreement for payment Of advance to be adjusted against rent---Finding by Tribunal that premises had been used for business purposes---Rent paid was deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 219 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes |
Reference/ Company/ Assets/ Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes/ Tribunal correct in holding that motor cars were includible in “net wealth” / -No question of law arose/ Finance Act, 1983, S.40(3)(vii)/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1928 246 ITR 800 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
KESHAB NARAYAN BANERJEE Vs COMMISSION OF INCOME-TAX and another |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.148 & 282. | service of notice |
----Writ---Appeal---Procedure--- contained in O. 41,R 22 of Civil Procedure Code would apply---No appeal or cross-objection by respondent--- Respondent cannot raise issue at the time of appeal---Question regarding service of notice Read More... |
2001 PTD 233 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs Mrs. KUKU NARANG |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Penalty/ Concealment of wealth |
Penalty/ Reference/ Concealment of wealth/ Finding by Tribunal that there had been clerical errors and no concealment of wealth/ Finding of fact/ No question of law arose from it/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27. Held, that the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1929 246 ITR 198 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOPE (INDIA) LTD.
(NOW PODDAR UDYOG LTD.)
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.5, 22 & 23. | Accrual of income |
-Income---Accrual of income—House property---Assessment maintaining accounts on mercantile system---Tenants agreeing to pay enhanced rent with retrospective effect---No accrual in year of account---Enhanced rent agreed to after Read More... |
2001 PTD 248 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs R. ARIFF AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.5(1)(iv) & 27 | Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm |
Reference/ Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm/ Commercial building also regarded as a house for purpose of S.5(1)(iv)/ Tribunal correct in holding that partner was entitled to exemption in respect of his share in firm in respect of property owned Read More... |
2001 PTD 1932 246 ITR 797 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
JUBILEE INVESTMENTS AND INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and other |
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. | Tax Deduction at source (TDS) |
----Deduction of tax at source---Delay in depositing TDS----Penalty----Levy of penalty justified though TDS deposited before ley of penalty---Liable to pay interest as well as penalty---Loss in business of assesses nothing to do with Read More...
|
2001 PTD 263 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
BHAGWANDAS JAIN AND 3 OTHERS
Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 | Reassessment notices/ Report of Valuation Officer |
Reassessment/ Assessment for assessment years 1979-80 to 1981-82 obtaining finality in 1984/ Reassessment notices issued in 1988 on basis of a report of Valuation Officer/ Report of Valuation Officer not called for during pendency of assessment but after completion Read More... |
2001 PTD 1934 246 ITR 632 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO. |
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. | Business expenditure |
--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More... |
2001 PTD 273 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs Smt. SOMA WANTI SETHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 27, 13 & 8 | Voluntary disclosure of wealth |
Voluntary disclosure of wealth/ Reference/ Assessee a partner in a firm/ Voluntary disclosure of income by firm/ Additions to net wealth of assessee on account of disclosure by firm/ Effect of non-compliance with S.13(2) read with S.8(1) of Voluntary Disclosure of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1940 246 ITR 683 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO. |
income Tax Act, 1961 S.221 | Payment to foreign collaborator |
--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More... |
2001 PTD 273 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs Mrs. R.B. PATEL |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 5(1)(viii) & 35 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake/ Exemption/ Jewellery/ Wealth tax assessment completed excluding value of jewellery as falling under exemption/ Retrospective amendment to S.5(1)(viii) by Finance (No.2) Act, 1971, making jewellary liable to wealth tax/ Wealth Tax Officer Read More... |
2001 PTD 1944 246 ITR 341 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs JOSEPH RAJAPPAN AND OTHERS |
Income tax Act, 1961. Ss. 139 & 148. | Carry forward and set off |
--Loss---Carry forward and set off--- Return of loss filed pursuant to notice under S. 148 within time limit prescribed under S. 139(4)---Will be deemed to have been filed under S.139---Assesse entitled to carry forward Read More...
|
2001 PTD 278 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs KALAWATI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 2 & 256 | Agricultural income/ Capital gains |
Reference/ Agricultural income/ Capital gains/ Profits from sale of agricultural lands/ Law applicable/ Effect of Explanation to S.2(1-A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970/ Whether income arising from transfer of agricultural lands can be treated as Read More... |
2001 PTD 1946 246 ITR 465 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs YAMUNA DIGITAL ELECTRONICS (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.35. | Scientific research |
---Scientific research---No requirement that expenditure should be wholly and exclusively for research and development---Proportionate deduction on basis of part use of plant and machinery for research-Permissible---Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 282 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
VISHIN N! KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER Vs VIDYA LACHMANDAS KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER |
Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, 1959 Ss. 6, 7 & 8 | National savings certificate/ Nomination |
National savings certificate/ Nomination/ Effect/ Upon death of holder, nominee entitled to receive sum under certificate without proof of title/ But retains such sum for benefit of persons entitled under law of succession/ Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1949 (2002)85 TAX 137 246 ITR 306 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
JJ I.T.C. LTD. and another Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 142 | Single Judge order |
----Assessment--Audit-Writ---Writ petition against order under S.142(2A) Order staying assessment proceedings and observing the payment of auditor”s fees would be considered at final hearing of writ petition---Order was Read More... |
2001 PTD 286 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs SMT. SHAKUNTLA MEHRA & 2 OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.7 & 25 | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets/ Revision/ Powers of Commissioner/ Valuation of properties on the basis of average of cost of construction and rent capitalization method/ Order erroneous and prejudicial to interests of Revenue/ Commissioner adopting valuation on rental income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1959 246 ITR 501 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Law well settled |
--Reference-Law on point well-settled---Reference not to be called for--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. When the law is clear and well-settled on a particular point, there can be no Read More... |
2001 PTD 289 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs HARRISON CROSSFIELD (INDIA) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 2(18) | Company in which public are substantially interested |
Company in which public are substantially interested/ Definition/ Assess company formed to take over Indian business of widely held foreign company/ Foreign company to hold 40 percent, shareholding in assessee-company/ Scheme of amalgamation completed by High Court Read More... |
2001 PTD 1963 246 ITR 88 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Expenses to |
Reference-Export. markets development allowance-Weighted deduction---Whether expenditure was wholly and exclusively for particular purpose or partly so-Question of fact---No question arises for reference--- Expenditure must be shown to Read More... |
2001 PTD 289 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs ABDUL GANI BHAT |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 | Computation of net wealth and tax payable |
Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was singed by him/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1965 246 ITR 607 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
CASHMER WOOLLEN AND SILK MILLS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Business income |
----Income---Business income---law applicable---Effect of introduction of cl.(iiia) in S.28 amendment of cl.(24) of S.2 with retrospective effect form 1-4-1962 by Finance Act, 1990---Premium earned on sale of import Read More...
|
2001 PTD 293 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs ANIL KUMAR |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3), 5(1)(iv) | Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition |
Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition in case of firm found by Tribunal to be intangible and not represented by assets/ Share of additions not includible in net wealth of partner/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Held, that under the Wealth Read More... |
2001 PTD 1968 246 ITR 38 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. PACIRSAMY NADAR Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256(2). | lottery ticket |
----Income from lottery---Encashment of lottery ticket by illegal exchange---Assessed as income form other sources---Question as framed did not arise for consideration--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,S.256(2).
Read More...
|
2001 PTD 295 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs ANOKHA SINGH |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.25 | Assessment order completed without inquiry |
Revision/ Powers of CWT/ Assessment order completed without inquiry/ Order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue/ CWT can revise such an order/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.25. Where the assessment is completed without any enquiry whatsoever the order of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1970 246 ITR 26 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | demonstration farm |
Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More... |
2001 PTD 298 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION MARKETING FEDERATION LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80 | Cooperative society/ Special deduction- |
Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Law applicable/ Amendment of S.80-P(2)(a)(iii) with retrospective effect/ Order passed by High Court in reference subsequent to amendment not taking note of amendment/ Writ petition challenging validity of amendment/ Direction Read More... |
2001 PTD 1974 246 ITR 486 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Business expenditure |
Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More... |
2001 PTD 298 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 18(1)(c) | Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property |
Penalty/ Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property on basis of valuation report of approved value/ Difference in estimate of valuation between approved valuer and departmental valuer/ Assessee”s valuation bona fide/ No deliberate understatement/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1975 246 ITR 524 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs STEEL COMPLEX LTD. |
Capital or revenue expenditure |
---Capital or revenue expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of steel---Incurring expenditure on installation of water treatment plant and fume extraction plant---Resulted in improvement in operation of existing systems with Read More... |
2001 PTD 310 |
||
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Questions of law and fact |
Reference/ Questions of law and fact/ Difference/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27. Where the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1975 246 ITR 524 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. | Business expenditure |
----Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 319 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF, D.R Vs IJAZ ALI BHATTI, ADVOCATE /A.R |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 R. 8(3) | Valuation of lands and buildings |
Valuation of lands and buildings/ Rented property, valuation of/ Value of rented out property was adopted higher than the Gross Annual Letting Value by the Department on the plea that property could fetch more rent than the one declared/ Validity/ Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2001 PTD 1981 246 ITR 524 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Interest on agricultural loans |
---Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. The assessee-company Read More... |
2001 PTD 319 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C. I. T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS ITTEFAQ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 4(1) | Claim interest expense/ overdraft/ loan |
Assessee, in the year 1976-77 ran a textile mill and claimed interest expense of Rs.1,30,5,259 on account of overdraft/ loan availed by the company/ Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had advanced a sum of Rs.33,79,391 to a subsidiary company on which no Read More... |
2001 PTD 2119 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
METAL POWDER CO. LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(c). | Business expenditure |
---- Business expenditure---Amounts not deductible---Company---Commission paid to director---Disallowance---Commission paid is also remuneration---Is subject to ceiling limit prescribed under sub-cl. (i) of cl. (c) of S.40 of Income-tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 322 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c) | Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure |
Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure/ Assets used by director of personal purposes/ Burden of proving that assets were not used for personal purposes of directors in on company/ No proof that motor car was not used for personal purposes of director/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 2121 239 ITR 405 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
AVANI CORPORATION Vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147. | Reassessment |
-Reassessment---Limitation---Failure to disclose, material facts---Facts recorded as reasons to reopen assessment recorded and considered in assessment order--No failure to disclose material facts---Reassessment after four years not Read More... |
2001 PTD 325 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs JAYPEE DYEING HOUSE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 | Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation |
Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation/ Higher rate in case of manufacture/ Assessee dyeing, printing and bleaching artificial silk cloth/ Assess was not engaged in manufacture/ Not entitled to higher rate of depreciation/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32/ Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 2134 239 ITR 418 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs AMRITABN R. SHAH |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. | Purchase of shares |
---Income from other sources---Deduction---Condition precedent for allowance ---Expenditure must be with primary motive of earning income---Purchase of shares with view to acquiring controlling interest in company---Object was not to Read More... |
2001 P T D 334 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME-TAX Vs TRAVANCORE CEMENTS LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37(3A) | Repairs expenses |
----Business expenditure---Disallowance---Repairs---Whether motor car expenses and repairs to car would fall under S.37(3A) for computing disallowance---Contrary views taken by Division Benches of High Court in CIT v. Navodaya (1997) 225 Read More... |
2001 PTD 338 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs GNANAMMBIGAL MILLS |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7). | Gratuity |
---Business expenditure---Gratuity---Insurance premium paid to L.I.C. under group gratuity scheme—Not deductible under S.37 of Indian Income Tax Act, 1961---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7). |
2001 PTD 340 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOTEL SHAH & CO. Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Return filing |
---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search Read More... |
2001 PTD 342 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
CLOUTH GUMMIWERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and another Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Income deemed to accrue |
Non-resident---Income---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India--- fees for technical services fees paid to foreign company for services of engineers for supervising erection of project---taxable--- Air fare of engineers paid by Read More...
|
2001 PTD 364 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs RADIO TALKIES |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.48. | Capital gains |
----Capital gains---Computation of---Closure of business of assessee and sale of land and building---Payment of retrenchment compensation to ex- employees---Not expenditure wholly and exclusively for purpose of transaction of Read More...
|
2001 PTD 376 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
G. GANAGADHARN NAIR Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. | Export earnings premium |
----Reference---Tribunal recording finding without considering evidence--- Question referred cannot be answered--Matter has to be remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,Ss.80HHC & 256.
The Read More...
|
2001 P T D 330 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOTEL SHAH & CO. Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Return filing |
---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search and seizure was long after Read More... |
2001 PTD 342 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs D.K. TRADING CO. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256. | evading tax |
---Reference---Firm---Registration---Whether or not firm genuine and whether or not formed as device to evade tax---Finding of fact---No question of law arises---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256. |
2001 PTD 380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE) Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | Administration of justice |
----Adverse order---Before adverse order is passed against any party such party should be afforded full opportunity to meet the case and rebut evidence used against Read More... |
2001 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE) Vs COMMISfSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | cash sales |
---S.32---Rejection of accounts---Unverifiable portion of cash sales--- Rejection of such sales by Assessing Officer---Previous as well as in subsequent years the declared results of the assessee had been accepted--- Contention of the Read More... |
2001 PTD 406 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs TODI TEA CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Assessee, a tea company---Contract for supply of tea by assessee---Breach of contract by assessee---Payment of sum by assessee under settlement entered into between parties---Assessee following mercantile system Read More... |
2001 PTD 435 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs. NIDA-I-MILLAT (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE I, LAHORE |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Gratuify |
----Allowable expenses---Gratuities payable to employees---Admissibility as expense against income of relevant years---Such amount is a proper charge on the income of the assessee and as such is admissible as an expense. Read More... |
2001 PTD 443 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs HINDUSTAN TELEPRINTERS LTD. |
income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 10(28) & 280ZB | Surtax |
Reassessment Information Company- Surtax- Computation of capital-Audit party bringing to notice of Assessing Officer failure to apply R.4-is not opinion as to law--Reassessment on basis thereof permissible---Indian Companies (Profits) Read More... |
2001 PTD 445 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE Vs Messrs. NAWA-E-WAQT PUBLICATIONS LTD., LAHORE |
Income-tax Act, 1922 | Income from property |
----Ss.9, 10 & 66(1)---Income from property---Rejection of claim of assessee without cogent reasons---Assessing Officer treated the declared income from property under S.9 of Income-tax Act, 1922, and rejected the claim of the Read More... |
2001 PTD 455 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SIMPSON & CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. | Capital, or revenue expenditure |
----Capital, or revenue expenditure---Expenditure to obtain technical know- how--General principles---Amount paid under collaboration agreement for acquiring technical know-how relating to manufacture of automobile engine---Technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 480 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs D.ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A). | Advance Tax |
---Advance Tax---Estimate filed---Failure to pay advance tax as per estimate filed---Interest cannot be levied---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A). Although the obligation cast on Read More... |
2001 PTD 487 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs THANTHI TRUST |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. | Charitable trust |
---Charitable purpose---Charitable trust---Exemption---Credit entries in accounts of trust in favour educational institutions---Corresponding withdrawals by educational institution---Amounts to application of income---Trust entitled to Read More... |
2001 PTD 491 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SRI RAMALINGA CHOODAMBIGAI MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, Expln. 2 & 43(5) (a). | Damages paid for cancellation of contracts |
---Business expenditure--- Damages paid for cancellation of contracts for purchase of cotton as assessee decided to produce yarn of higher count---Hedging contracts and not speculative transaction---Deductible as revenue Read More... |
2001 PTD 495 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961. | Rental Income |
---Business Income---Rental Income---Superstructure on leasehold land let out to parties for limited period---Is income from business---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. Whether the plot of land was Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | maintenance of flat used for business |
---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
LUCAS TVS LTD Vs COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 35B | Ceiling on expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Ceiling on expenditure---Company---Director who is also an employee and a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6) (viia)---Amount exempt under S.10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Ss.40(c) Read More... |
2001 PTD 502 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. | Depreciation |
---Depreciation---Flat used for business purpose---Flat standing in name of director and not assessee-Company---Facts not properly enquired into---Matter remanded---Depreciation not to be allowed if assessee fails to prove ownership of flat---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | maintenance of flat used for business |
---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null Vs null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 59-A(2) & 59(3), 59A | Adjustment |
---Ss. 59-A(2) & 59(3)---C.B.R. Circular No.18 of 1980, dated 28th July, 1980---Addition---Powers of Assessing Officer to make addition---Scope---Assessing Officer was not empowered to make an addition of undisclosed income to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1043 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
A & M AGENCIES Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 194A, 201 & 231. | Payment of interest |
---Recovery of tax---Limitation---Deduction of tax at source---Payment of interest without deducting tax at source---ITO failing to treat assessee as an assessee in default by an order under S.201--- Initiation of proceedings for Read More... |
2001 PTD 505 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
TAMILNADU DAIRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.32. | ownership |
----Depreciation---"Owner", meaning of---Person who receives income from asset in his own right entitled to allowance---Legal ownership not condition in such a case---Refusal to grant depreciation solely for failure to produce registered Read More... |
2001 PTD 508 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs LUCAS INDIAN SERVICE LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Remuneration |
---Business expenditure---Remuneration to employees---General Principles---Pension paid to (widow of director--- Resolution passed while director was working for assessee-company authorising payment of pension to director and after his Read More... |
2001 PTD 514 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs V. RAMAKRISHNA SONS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104, 155(7) | Additional tax |
----Rectification of mistakes---Company---Additional tax on undistributed profits---Rectification under S. 155(7) of order passed under S.104---I.A.C.”s approval not required---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.104 & 155(7). The approval of the Read More... |
2001 P T D 520 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDUSTRIAL CONSULTING BUREAU (P.) LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 144B | Municipal taxes |
----Deduction---Draft assessment order---Revised return---Deduction claimed in revised return after passing of draft assessment order---Cannot be entertained---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 144B. |
2001 PTD 524 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.145 & 256(2) | books of account |
Reference---Accounting---Finding that books of account had been maintained regularly and that no defects had been found in accounts--- Tribunal justified in holding that accounts could not be rejected under S.145---No question of law Read More... |
2001 PTD 526 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) | Income from undisclosed sources |
---Reference-Income from undisclosed sources---Finding that explanation regarding consumption of raw materials was satisfactory---Tribunal justified in deleting addition to income---No question of law arose---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 526 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs PREMIER MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.3 & 32 | Depreciation |
---Previous year---Depreciation---Change in previous year---Power of Assessing Officer to impose conditions for such change---Assessing Officer cannot curtail statutory deduction admissible for such period---Assessing Officer agreeing to Read More... |
2001 PTD 530 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7) | Gratuity |
----Business expenditure---Gratuity amount relating to pre-nationalisation period---Debited to approved gratuity reserve---Gratuity paid to employees during year under assessment---Is allowable deduction---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 535 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs KERALA TRANSPORT COMPANY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Business expenditure |
----Business expenditure---Assessee carrying on transport business---Liability in respect of loss of goods---Liability under Carriers Act, 1865, is a. statutory liability--Provisions made in respect of such liability in accounts Read More... |
2001 PTD 539 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ARVIND H. SHAH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) | Promissory note |
----Reference---Promissory note found during a search of residential premises of assessee---Additions made in income of assessee during assessment year 1987-88 deleted by CIT (Appeals) on the ground that additions had already been made Read More... |
2001 PTD 545 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs REGIONAL SOYABEAN PRODUCTS COOPERATIVE UNION LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220, 220(2A), 143(2), 143(1), 143 | Procedure for assessment |
----Assessment---Procedure for assessment---Notice issued under S. 143(2)--- Assessing Officer cannot issue intimation under S.143(1)(a) thereafter--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.143. |
2001 PTD 548 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Mst. FARIDA BIBI Vs I.T.O., CIRCLE 14, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 136 | Obligation of the High Court |
Reference to High Court/ Scope/ Obligation of the High Court to decide the questions of law referred to it was contingent upon the hearing of the case/ Hearing of the case could not be made unless the party at whose instance the questions had been referred to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 2137 84 TAX 186 239 ITR 418 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs M.K. RAJU CONSULTANTS (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80, 80AB, 80B(5), 80-O | Special deduction |
----Special deduction---Income by way of fees for work done outside India--- Deduction of such fees from gross total income---Fees received from abroad constituted assessee”s gross receipt-Income from fees is to be computed in Read More... |
2001 PTD 556 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs Miss SRIPRIYA MAHESH |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 1D | Valuation of shares |
Valuation of shares---Tax liability of company upheld by High Court---Tax liability to be deducted for purpose of determining break-up value of the share of company---Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R.1-D. The assessee was a shareholder in a company, S, which Read More... |
2001 PTD 1624 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c)(ii) | Reimbursement of medical expense |
Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Company/ Reimbursement of medical expense and cash payment like house rent allowance paid to managing director are part of salary/perquisite for purpose of disallowance under S.40(c)(ii)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 2139 2391 ITR 416 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
----Capital or revenue expenditure---Amount paid initially for acquiring membership of organisation entitling assessee to receive latest technical information---Membership to be renewed annually---Assessee did not acquire asset of Read More... |
2001 PTD 560 |
|
Rajasthan High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs Smt. GULAB DEVI |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3) | Firm |
Reference---Valuation of assets—Firm---Valuation of closing stock given in balance-sheet---Burden on Revenue to prove that valuation was not correct and that market value exceeded it by more than twenty per cent.----Burden of Proof not discharged by Read More... |
2001 PTD 1629 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A(5). | Cash payments like house rent allowance |
Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Cash payments like house rent allowance paid to employees/ Is to be treated as salary for determining ceiling under S.40A(5)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(5). The Tribunal was correct in holding that the cash payment Read More... |
2001 PTD 2139 2391 ITR 416 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 209A | Advance tax |
----Advance tax---Liability to pay advance tax---Obligation to file estimate-- Law applicable---Effect of S.209A inserted w.e.f. 1-6-1978---Order passed by Tribunal without considering effect of S.209A---Matter remanded--- Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 564 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS HOME PLANNERS THROUGH MUHAMMAD AZEEM, PARTNER Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CIRCLE06, COYS, ZONEIII, LAHORE (NOW CIRCLE 14, COY ZONEII, LAHORE) AND 4 OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 65(1), 65(2) | Reassessment |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Reassessment----Requirements for issuing notice under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Principles---Where the requirement postulated in S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 had not been met by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1633 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2001 |
STATE BANK OF PATIALA Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.245 | Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable |
Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable under Income-tax Act/ Condition precedent/ Intimation mush be given to assessee prior to such set-off/ Indian Income Tax, Act, 1961 S.245. The following conditions must exist or be fulfilled in order to set off a Read More... |
2001 PTD 2145 239 ITR 421 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SUDARSAN CHIT (INDIA) LTD. (NO. 1) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 36(1)(v) | Contribution to approved gratuity fund |
----Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund--- Conditions precedent---Condition that employee should have rendered service for five years or more---Employees of holding company taken over by assessee---Service of Read More... |
2001 PTD 566 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
USMAN SAEED BUTT Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOMETAX, CIRCLE2 COM, ZONEI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 58, 61 | Opinion / Decision |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition----Issuance of notices under Ss.56, 58 & 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance in the names of a dead person---Fact that the person had died was within the knowledge of the Assessing Officer who instead Read More... |
2001 PTD 1647 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs CHENNAI PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.37 & 201(1A) | Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid |
Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid under S.201 (1A) for failure to deduct tax at source and remit it to Central Government/ Interest is not deductible as business expenditure/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & Read More... |
2001 PTD 2156 239 ITR 435 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
Vs PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | Interpretation of statutes |
---Taxing statute---Words in a taxing statute including notifications and orders, unless ambiguous, must be given their ordinary and natural meaning--Subject is not to be taxed unless the statute clearly imposes the burden of tax, while Read More... |
2001 PTD 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS ANSAR EXPORT ENTERPRISES LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ZONE B, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Compensate |
Income---Customs rebate was direct income of the assessee---Principles---Rebate, discount and commission---Connotation. A rebate of tax when with reference to actual amounts earlier paid by a taxpayer is different from the one given with reference to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1649 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE Vs PUNJAB COOKING OIL LTD, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 13(1)(d) | Deemed income/ Addition |
Deemed income/ Addition/ Two separate and independent approvals of the I.A.C. for making additions to the declared income of the assessee were necessary at the relevant Read More... |
2001 PTD 2161 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
Vs PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) | Deduction of income-tax at source |
S.52---Deduction of income-tax at source---Failure to deduct such income-tax---Effect---Assessee who fails to deduct income-tax at source is treated as "assessee in default"---Where payee/deductee pays his full tax, any shortfall in or Read More... |
2001 PTD 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
WELCON CHEMICALS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80, 50, 50(4), 50(5), 80C(4) | Deduction |
Deduction of tax at source----Assessee, deriving income from sale of pesticides---Income-tax was paid by the assesse under S.50(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 at the time of import---Department had asked the assessee to pay the income-tax as a supplier under Read More... |
2001 PTD 1656 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER Vs ANUPCHAND & CO. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 | Depreciation/ Rate of allowance |
Depreciation/ Rate of allowance/ Higher rate applicable in case of business of hiring/ Assessee using trucks for own business and claiming depreciation on trucks at 40 percent/ 40 percent, applicable to vehicles used for hire business/ Assessee using trucks for own Read More... |
2001 PTD 2162 239 ITR 466 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Expenditure not incidental to business |
---S.136---Appeal to High Court---Maintainability---Where the decision rests on examination of the facts on record, the same would be a question of law as the question whether inference framed from give facts or not was a question of Read More... |
2001 PTD 609 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 31, 40A(7), 40A(7)(b), 154 | Surtax |
Business expenditure---Company---Surtax---Surtax is levied on profits of a company---Surtax is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund---Trust deed executed on 26-8-1970---Amendment of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1661 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.23(i)(xviii) | Expenditure not incidental to business |
---S.23(i)(xviii)---Deduction---Expenditure not incidental to business---Refusal to allow such expenditure as deductions under S.23 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Expenditure of salaries made by the assesse was not deducted by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 609 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
AURO FOOD LTD
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 220(2A). | Waiver of interest |
The three conditions for grant of waiver of interest under section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are that (i) payment of such amount has caused or would cause genuine hardship to the assesse; (ii) default in the payment of the Read More...
|
2001 PTD 613 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs SESHASAYEE BROS. (PVT) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 28 | Accrual of income/ Time of accrual |
Income/ Accrual of income/ Time of accrual/ Managing agency agreement providing for remuneration at a certain percentage and a minimum remuneration/ Additional remuneration payable if it exceeded minimum after audited balance-sheet and profit and loss account were Read More... |
2001 PTD 2169 239 ITR 471 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.55 & 57 | Return |
---Ss.55 & 57---Revised return---Failure to reflect/mention figure of capital gains in the relevant column of the return---Revised return whether to be treated as one under S.57 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Return was initially Read More... |
2001 PTD 623 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs RAASI CEMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 56 & 256 | Income or capital/ Other sources |
Reference/ Income or capital/ Other sources/ Tribunal justified in holding that interest earned on borrowed capital constituted capital receipts and that it was not assessable as income from other sources/ No question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.56 Read More... |
2001 PTD 2180 239 I T R 596 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Accrual of Income |
---Income---According---Accrual of Income---Time of accrual---Collaboration agreement with non-resident company---Amount received by assesse-company under agreement---Resolution of Board of Directors before entering into agreement that Read More...
|
2001 PTD 628 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs JAYALAKSHMI MILLS (PVT) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A | Business expenditure/ Gratuity |
Business expenditure/ Gratuity/ Conditions laid down in S.40A(7) must be fulfilled/ Remittance of amount less than that required statutorily/ -Assessee cannot claim lesser benefit not entitled to any deduction Income Tax Act.1961, S. 40A. Section Read More... |
2001 PTD 2185 239 ITR 605 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NATIONAL BEVERAGES (PVT.) LTD
Vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.65 | Definite information |
---S.65---Definite information---Re-opening of assessment---Scope---Change of opinion of Income Tax Officer---Where assessee had disclosed all the material facts without concealment and the assessment had been consciously completed by Read More... |
2001 PTD 633 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
Vs A. C. MAHESH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 45 | Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets |
Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets by partner constitutes transfer within the meaning of S.45/ Question whether capital gains arose when amount was credited in both capital account and current account of partner not considered by Tribunal/ Matter remanded/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 2189 239 ITR 616 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD. Vs CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Reassessment Escapment of Income |
---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment Information can be gathered from material relating to subsequent assessment year---Assessee publishing newspaper---Calculation of wastage of newsprint found to be excessive Read More... |
2001 PTD 650 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs BHAGWAT PRASAD P. PARIKH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80U | Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability |
Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability/ Whether assessee suffers from permanent physical disability and whether disability results in substantially reducing his capacity to engage in gainful employment or occupation/ Are questions of fact/ Quantum of Read More... |
2001 PTD 2193 239 ITR 645 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
CHAMUNDI GRANITES (P.) LTD Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 269-SS & 271-D | Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits |
Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits/ Constitutional validity of provisions/ Section 269-SS stipulating that loans and deposits exceeding prescribed limit should be taken only by way of crossed cheques or crossed Bank drafts/ Section 271-D Read More... |
2001 PTD 2200 239 ITR 694 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80P(2)(a)(i) | Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities |
Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities, subsidy from Government, interest from other cooperative institutions and Banks and dividends are entitled to special deduction under S.80P/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.80P(2)(a)(i). Interest Read More... |
2001 PTD 2208 239 ITR 700 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) SS. 13 & 111 | Unexplained investment |
---SS. 13 & 111---Unexplained investment---Concealment of income-tax Penalty---Retrospective effect of S.111(2)(c) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Income Tax Authorities imposed penalty on the assesse for having concealed the assets Read More... |
2001 PTD 668 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs VALIKA ART FABRICS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19 & 22 | Rental income |
---S.19---Rental income---Premises/properties used for manufacturing process or business---Income derived by renting out such premises/properties---Such income to be treated as rental income---Failure to produce any material evidence to Read More... |
2001 PTD 672 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 9 & 44-D | Income deemed to accrue or arise in India |
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India/ Non-resident/ Business connection/ Agreement with resident for rendering technical services/ Amount paid by resident to non-resident treated by assessing authority as royalty and technical fees taxable under S.9(1)(vii) Read More... |
2001 PTD 2218 239 ITR 713 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Miss AASIA FILM ARTIST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 46(1) | penalty |
---S.46(1)---Imposition of penalty---Principle of natural justice---Applicability---Show-cause notice, non-issuance of---Effect---Penalty was imposed on the assessee by the Income-tax Authorities under S.46(1) of Income-tax Act, 1922, Read More... |
2001 PTD 678 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS SUTLEJ TEXTILE MILLS, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 34 | Assessee sold out his factory |
Reference to High Court/ Assessee sold out his factory but remained in possession/ Sale was revoked after two years/ Assessee filed turn on notice under S.34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 declaring loss and claimed that it was Custodian of Enemy Property who was Read More... |
2001 PTD 2232 84 TAX 284 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Importants |
---Meaning of word/expression in a particular section of statute---Reporting to ordinary dictionary meaning---Scope---Courts in assigning/defining the meaning of a word/expression has to take into consideration the object or the purpose Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs J. K. BERI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 147 & 256(2) | Reassessment |
Reference/ Reassessment/ Tribunal quashing reassessment on legal grounds alone without considering facts/ Question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.147 & 256(2). Held, that since the Tribunal had stated that it had quashed the reassessment Read More... |
2001 PTD 2246 248 ITR 5 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.2(24) | net income |
---S.2(24)---Income as mentioned in S.2(24), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Connotation---Expression “income” does not mean “net income” after making all permissible allowances, deduction, depreciations Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE Vs Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 5(1)(c) & 136 | Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities |
Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities/ Reference to High Court/ Assessment order had to be made by the Deputy Commissioner of the Income-tax while such privilege, in respect of certain classes of persons or cases, could very well be exercised by a person higher in Read More... |
2001 PTD 2247 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 23 & 136(1) | Description on assets given on |
---Ss. 23 & 136(1)---Depreciation on leased assets---Refusal to allow the depreciation form net income from lease rentals---Assessee being dissatisfied with the assessment filed appeal before Appellate Authority---Assessment framed Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE Vs Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 136 & 66-A(1) | Authority equal in status |
Reference to High Court/ Authority equal in status/ Power of revision/ Authority equal in status could Read More... |
2001 PTD 2247 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
THANJAI MURASU (P.) LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Esculent of Income |
---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment---Information can be gathered from material, relating to subsequent years---Assessee publishing newspaper---Wastage of newsprint found to the excessive on comparison with Read More... |
2001 PTD 690 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
SHER SINGH (HUF) Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Acquisition of land by Government |
Net wealth/ Acquisition of land by Government/ Right to receive compensation/ Value of right to receive compensation on date alone includible in assessee”s net wealth/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Reference/ Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/ Additional Read More... |
2001 PTD 2249 247 ITR 103 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SOUTH INDIA CORPORATION AGENCIES (P.) LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40A & 147. | Failure to disclose material facts |
---Reassessment---Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment---Company---Failure to give full details of expenses which could be disallowed under S.40A(5)---Reassessment proceedings were valid---Indian Income Tax ACT, Read More... |
2001 PTD 693 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
K. GOVINDAN & SONS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139 & 147 | Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns |
Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns/ Meaning of “regular assessment”/ Assessment made for first time under S.147 is a regular assessment/ Interest under S.139(8) could be levied in case of such an assessment/ Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 2258 247 ITR 192 |
|
Gauhati High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs JOHN FOWLER (INDIA) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Income from undisclosed sources |
---Income from undisclosed sources---Reference---Finding that particular amount did not constitute income from undisclosed sources---Finding of fact---Tribunal justified in deleting amount from income---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 700 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs ATTUR THULUVA VELLALAR SANGAM |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(i) | Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity |
Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity/ Sufficient if primary object of trust is charitable/ Trust having as its main object imparting of education and other objects of general public utility/ Collection Read More... |
2001 PTD 1898 243 ITR 774 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.254 | Tribunal |
---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal has power to admit addition ground of appeal---Tribunal has power to remand matter ITO-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254. Held, that Read More... |
2001 PTD 708 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
GANDHI TRADING Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.281B | attachment of property |
---Provisional attachment of property---Provisional attachment of property during pendency of assessment proceedings---Condition precedent for provisional attachment---Sufficient material on record to show that assessee would dispose of Read More... |
2001 PTD 711 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. | Interest on securities |
---Interest on securities---Assessability---Interest on securities assessable on due basis---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.18. On a bare reading of section 18 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is clear Read More... |
2001 PTD 717 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Payment of market fees to Market Committee---Payment exceeding Rs.2,500 by cash disallowed by ITO---Miscellaneous application by assessee before Tribunal enclosing letter from Market Committee that committee not Read More... |
2001 PTD 720 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18 | interest |
The Income-tax Officer had also disallowed a sum of Rs.41,666 representing provision made for liability for interest payable to the Haryana Government on arrears of purchase tax by invoking section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. But Read More... |
2001 PTD 720 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SUHASHBHAI VADILAL |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.45 & 48. | Sale of shares |
---Capital gains---Sale of shares---Computation of capital gains---Deduction of costs of acquisition of shares---Shares held in a company---Sales of entire unit of company located in Bombay to a new company formed by it---Shareholders of Read More... |
2001 PTD 725 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. L. SWAMY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 271(1)( c ) & 273A | Concealment of income |
Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More... |
2001 PTD 735 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. L. SWAMY Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271(1)(c) & 273A. | Penalty |
Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More... |
2001 PTD 735 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null Vs null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null | Casual |
Casual income---Word “casual”---Connotation---Assessee was Director-employee of a company and certain amount of loan advanced to him during his service with the company was waived by the employer company at the time of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1047 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
null Vs null |
Finance Act, 1991 12, I2(12)(d), 12(1) | Fixed Assets |
---S.12---Corporate Assets Tax---Levy---Validity---Fixed assets---Meaning---“Work in progress” being full covered by the term “fixed assets” as used in S.12(12)(d), Finance Act, 1991 was chargeable to capital assets, tax under S.12(1) read Read More... |
2001 PTD 1052 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null Vs null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5(1), 13(2), 66A, 5(a)(c)(cc), 13 | Unexplained Investment |
---Ss.13(2), 5(1) & 66-A---Unexplained investment---Newly-acquired assets by assessee---Failure of assessee to file objection when required by the Assessing Officer---Effect---Enhancement of income of assessee by Assessing Read More... |
2001 PTD 1059 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
V.T. VENKATESWARAN Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 2(m)(iii) | Unexplained investment |
---Deductions---Wealth Tax liability as finally assessed is deductible---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The assessee is entitled to claim for deduction of the wealth tax liability as finally assessed or determined by the Wealth Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 1064 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs L. BUSAPPA KUMAR |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(IA), 45, 256 | Unexplained investment |
---Reference---Capital gains---Transfer of agricultural lands---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.2(1A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970—Question whether capital gains could be levied on gains arising on transfer of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1066 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs MAHENDRA MILLS and 2 Others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28, 29, 32, 34 | Unexplained investment |
---Depreciation---Assessee not claiming Read More... |
2001 PTD 1068 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Accrual of income |
---Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry----On a writ, High Court by interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixed by Government----Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse in excess of Read More... |
2001 PTD 743 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Interest |
----Business expenditure---Interest—Sugar industry---Price realised in excess of levy price fixed by Government—High Court directing refund excess with interest at the rate of 12 per cent. Per annum—Liability to pay Read More... |
2001 PTD 743 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO Vs H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Interest (money) |
----Business expenditure---Interest---Money borrowed for paying income-tax---Interest on money borrowed is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2001 PTD 749 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Accrual of income |
----Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry---On a writ, High Court interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixe by Government---Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse excess of levy Read More... |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
S.S.M. BROTHERS (P.) LTD. AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 33, 33(1)(b)(B)(i); Sched. V, | Unexplained investment |
---Development rebate---Textile machinery---Machinery used for production of textile “including those otherwise processed”---Machinery used at any stage of production eligible for higher rebate---Assessee purchasing cloth and Read More... |
2001 PTD 1103 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.8 | Accrual of income |
--S.8---Power of Central Board of Revenue—Scope---Central Board of Revenue can only issue clarification and is not empowered to give any meanings to any provisions of the statute through its own interpretation. Read More... |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.52 | Deduction of tax at source |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS NASEER MUGHIS LTD., LAHORE Vs C.I.T., LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 23, 23A, 23D, 23(2), 23(1) | dividend or bonus |
---S. 23 A---Assessment—Undistributed dividend or bonus---Double taxation---Income-tax Authorities imposed tax on the assesse-company on the basis of undistributed profit as income under the provisions of S.23A of Income-Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 772 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PESHAWAR Vs MESSRS GUL COOKING OIL AND VEGETABLE GHEE (PVT.) LTD, AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.50(5), 56 & 63 | Accrual of income |
---Ss.50(5), 56 & 63---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185(3) & 247—Notification No. S.R.O. 593(1)/91, Dated 30-6-1991—Advance income-tax exemption of---Deducting of such tax on the goods imported by assesse to Read More... |
2001 PTD 778 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs KHURRAM SAGHIR INDUSTRIES, LAHORE
Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1) | Approval |
----Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1)---Re-assessment---Requirement of prior approval---Object---Income-tax Authorities without prior separate approvals made assessments under Ss.13(1) & 13(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 781 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS HABIB CREDIT & EXCHANGE BANK LIMITED Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Capital Asset |
---S.136---Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), S.13---Appeal to High Court---Banking company---Question of treatment given by the department to the money acquired by Banking company from surrender/sale of Federal Investment Bonds Read More... |
2001 PTD 785 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
Vs Messrs AL-GHAZI TRACTOR LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Warranty Commission |
---Warranty Commission---Unexpired warranty commission---Not a revenue receipt---Principles. |
2001 PTD 789 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Penal interest |
---Deduction---Penal Read More... |
2001 PTD 793 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2001 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF AND 21 OTHERS Vs GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16 & 19 | Effect/ retrospectively |
---Ss.16 & 19 [as amended by Finance Act (IX of 1996)]---Notification No.C-1/167-1/ITP/86, dated, 16-7-1996--- imposition of tax---Explanation added to S.19, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 did not speak of its applicability with Read More... |
2001 PTD 795 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS MIAN MUHAMMAD ASLAM Vs C.I.T., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 27, 27(2)(a)(ii), 13, 136, 151 | Capital gain |
---Ss. 27, 151 & 2(24)---Capital gain---Exemption---Sale of land by Company---Share of Director/shareholder of the Company in the sale proceeds of land of assesse-Company----Taxability----“Income” as defined in S.2(24), Read More... |
2001 PTD 1222 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs P.M. ITOOP |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Schedule III | Valuation of property |
----Valuation of residential house----Method of valuation----Law applicable---Schedule III to Wealth Tax Act introduced with effect from 1-4-1989---Amended provisions applicable to all pending proceedings--- wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 P T D 1228 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs J. ABDUL KHADER SAIT AND ONOTHER |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 null |
---Valuation of assets---Valuation of land with buildings thereon---Yield or rental method of valuation is proper---Value cannot be enhanced by adding reversionary value of land---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. In valuing lands with Read More... |
2001 P T D 1230 |
||
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs D. KRISHNA MURTHY |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 7(4) | Valuation of assets |
----Valuation of assets---land belonging to HUF----Building on land belonging to Karta of HUF in individual capacity---Building used by HUF as residential house---Section 7(4) applicable for valuation purposes---Land and building to be Read More... |
2001 P T D 1233 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs KARNAL COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 null | Income of capital |
---Income of capital---Amounts deposited to open letter of credit for purchase of machinery required for setting up plant----Interest on such amount is directly connected and incidental to construction of plant---Interest was a capital Read More... |
2001 P T D 1236 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs CADILA CHEMICALS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 256 | Business expenditure |
----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Amount paid as premium for purchase of deferred annuity policies in respect of Managing Director----Whether allowable---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2001 P T D 1238 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
ALANKAR COMMERCIAL (PVT.) LTD Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 4, 148 | Charge of tax |
---Charge of tax---Income accruing of arising in India is chargeable to tax under Income-tax Act----Company having its registered office in Sikkim---Notice under S.148 in respect of.income accruing or arising in India to such Read More... |
2001 P T D 1240 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs INDIAN LEAF SPRING MANUFACTURING (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 40(c), 256 | Perquisites to directors and employees |
----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Perquisites to directors and employees---Insurance permia paid by company on behalf of employee-director---Whether could be disallowed under S. 40A(5) for Read More... |
2001 P T D 1241 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED, AVARI PLAZA, HILTON HOTEL, SHAHRAH-E-QUAID-E-AZAM, LAHORE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10 | Capital expenditure |
----Capital expenditure---Determination---Requirements---Assessee engaged in the business of transmission and distribution of gas had paid certain amount to the Provincial Irrigation Department for additional protective work built on Read More... |
2001 PTD 798 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Mrs. ISMAT KAMAL
Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX CIRCLE-II, ZONE-C, LAHORE and 2 others |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) S. 31-B | Self assessment |
---S. 31-B---C.B.R. Circular No.5 of 1994, dated 19-9-1994---Additional wealth tax---levy of additional wealth tax was not mandatory---Value of rented out house was declared by the assesse on the basis of Annual Rental Value after Read More... |
2001 PTD 807 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
Vs NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 59 | Self assessment |
---S. 59---C.B.R. Circular No.4 of 1996, dated 1-7-1996 C.B.R. Circular No.16 of 1996, dated 3-9-1996---C.B.R. Letter C. No. 7(27)/S.Asstt./96, dated 2-6-1996---Self assessment---“Broad-based Self-Assessment Scheme” for Read More... |
2001 PTD 811 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Vs NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6 | provision or reserves |
---Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Fourth Sched. , R.5(a) [as amended by Finance Ordinance (XXV of 1980)]---Deduction---Insurance business---“Provision of a reserve” as Read More... |
2001 PTD 814 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Vs NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 | Amendment |
Amendment brought about by Finance Act, 1980 was only prospective and that in case of pending assessments at the relevant time the Assessing Officer could not go beyond the provisions of rule 5 of the Fourth Schedule as originally made. Read More... |
2001 PTD 814 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40(a)(v) & 40(c) | Remuneration to employees |
----Business expenditure----Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Remuneration to employees---Remuneration for employment outside India not to be taken into account for purposes of computing ceiling---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 818 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40(a)(v) & 40(c) | weighted deduction |
---Export markets development allowance---weighted deduction---Condition precedent---Not necessary that exports should be made directly from India---Expenditure Incurred on export of tea from East Africa to U.K---Entitled to weighted Read More... |
2001 PTD 818 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
H.H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JU DEO
Vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 | Escapment of Income |
Reassessment---Condition precedent---Reason to believe that wealth had Reassess escaped assessment---WTO must have material for such belief-Assessee submitting returns and giving details regarding foreign shares and stocks... Original Read More... |
2001 PTD 822 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
MKS. MOHD. ABOOBACKER SAHEB
Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5(1)(xviii) | award and reward |
---Exemption---Award---Difference between award and reward---Reward received by a tax informer is not an award---Not entitled to exemption Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(xviii). There is a Read More... |
2001 PTD 831 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs S.V. SIVARATHINA PANDIAN |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2), 16A | Revision |
---Revision---Powers of CWT---Meaning of “Record” for purposes of revision---Record includes material available at time of examination by Valuation Officer Under S.16A---Report of Valuation Officer received after completion Read More... |
2001 PTD 855 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs B. CHANDRASEKHARA RAO |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R.2 | Minor |
Exemption---House property---Firm---Minor---Minor admitted to benefits of partnership---House property owned by firm---Minor entitled to exemption under S.5(1)(iv) in respect of his share in such house property--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 835 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D. | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets---Valuation of unquoted equity shares---Deductions--- Liability towards sales tax penalty---Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal modifying order of penalty subsequent to valuation date---Subsequent order must be taken into Read More... |
2001 PTD 843 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of property |
Valuation of property--Reference to Valuation Officer---Valuation requested for a number of assessment years---Completion of assessment for one of assessment years before valuation report was received---Valuation was not Read More... |
2001 PTD 843 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX WEALTH TAX Vs V. RANGNATHAM CHETTY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Trustee |
----Representative assessee---Trustee---Assessee sole surviving trustee endowed with all rights over properties---Rights given to assessee modified by supplementary deed confining right to assessee to first floor of property---Assessee Read More... |
2001 PTD 857 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI Vs MESSRS AMANAT ALI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Reopening of assessment |
----Ss. 65, 59(1) & 13(1)(b)---Reopening of assessment--- Scope and extent---Self Assessment Scheme---Unexplained investment---Once the assessment was re-opened under s.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on one specific- issue, the Read More... |
2001 PTD 860 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt Vs Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D | Representative assessee |
S.6--Exemption---Applicability---Question whether the case was covered under S.6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 was a question of fact, which required appreciation of the facts and circumstances of the Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt Vs Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D | Interpretation of statutes |
Preamble---Preamble could be used in aid of the interpretation but if the main provision was clear in its application, Preamble was not to be read in as a part of the same---Preamble was not a part of statute and while interpreting a Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt Vs Talat Altaf |
Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992) 6, (126)-D, 14, | Protection of Economic Reforms |
S.6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Second Sched., Part I, cl. (126-D)---Exemption---Words used "otherwise notified" in S.6 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992--Connotation---Section 6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) | Protection of Economic Reforms |
S.65-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S.34---Re-opening of assessment under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Limitation---Extended time of limitation after enforcement of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 under $65 could not be made Read More... |
2001 PTD 874 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
Iqbal Khawaja Vs Mian Manawar Ghafoor, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50 | Securities |
---“Securities”---Meaning---Term “securities” means and includes such documents which company issued in recognition of one”s share in business and assets of the company which entitled the securities holders Read More... |
2001 P T D (Trib.) 876 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Determination of status |
---Ss.2(16)(c), 2(30) & 2(40)(c)---Company---Non-resident or resident—Determination of status—Company/assesse was registered in U.S.A.—Branch Office in Pakistan claimed “resident status” being permanent Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.12(5)(a) | Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan |
---S.12(5)(a)---Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan---Fee for technical services---Fiction of place---Fees paid to non-resident were deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan under S.12(5)(a)of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 if technical services were utilized Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62---C.B.R. Circular No.2(3)IT/2, dated 20-11-1982---Convention between Government of Pakistan and Government of U.S.A. for Avoidance of Double Taxation, Arts. II(1), III(1). & III(3)---Tax on Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF-INCOME-TAX, LAHORE
Vs MESSRS IMMION INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Reference to High Court |
S.136--Reference to High Court---Purpose and scope---Where the answer to a question is applicable to a certain assessee only in a particular year and is not of general application, a reference to the High Court need not be Read More... |
2001 PTD 900 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs B.D. GOENKA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 | Additions |
---Net wealth---Assessee, partner in firm---Additions made to book profit of firm in assessment proceedings under Income-tax Act on account of exploitation of customs clearance certificates---Share of assessee in income derived by firm Read More... |
2001 PTD 906 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs M.K. ABDUL KHADER HAJI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 | Exemption |
---Exemption---Moneys and assets brought by Indian citizen ordinarily residing abroad who returns with intention of residing in India permanently---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.5(1)(xxxiii) w.e.f. 1-4-1987---Remittances made Read More... |
2001 PTD 908 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs HARIBHAI ESTATE (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 | Interest on fixed deposits |
---Reference---Business---Other sources---Interest---Interest on fixed deposits, temporary loans and arrears of sales deposit---Whether income from business or from other sources---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, 56 Read More... |
2001 PTD 915 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs KIKABIs EDUCATIONAL TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13 | Charitable trust |
---Charitable purposes---Charitable trust---Exemptions---Denial of exemption where trust funds are diverted for benefit of persons mentioned in S.13---Educational trust---Trustees partners in firms---irrevocably assigning share income Read More... |
2001 PTD 917 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
EIMCO K.C.P. LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(1) | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---General Principles---Capital or Revenue expenditure---Technical know-how---New company floated by Indian company and foreign company giving its technical now-how and obtaining equity shares in new company---Amount attributable to technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 918 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Heads of income |
---Heads of income-General principles relating to deduction under various heads of income---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. The following principles may be laid down; (i) of the income of an assessee is Read More... |
2001 PTD 925 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Vs A.R. BALARAMAN and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(1)(xxxii) | Exemption |
---Exemption---Firm---Partner---Industrial undertaking---Condition precedent---Manufacture of article---Firm purchasing silk yarn and getting cloth manufactured by weavers who on their own machines wove the material supplied by Read More... |
2001 PTD 931 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. THE NIZAMs SUPPLEMENTAL FAMILY TRUST Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 143, 147 & 237 | Reassessment/ Refund |
---Reassessment---Assessment---Return---Refund---Return filed alongwith application for refund is a valid return---Reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated so long as assessment proceedings are not terminated---Application for refund Read More... |
2001 PTD 933 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs K. SITALAKSHMI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 | Charge of tax/ Minor |
---Charge of tax---Minor---Trust created for benefit of minor---Income of trust to be accumulated and handed over to minor on her attaining majority---Income from trust held not to be assessable in the hands of minor in Income-tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 944 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13. | Loan to the employee |
When an appeal is dismissed by the Supreme Court by a non-speaking order, the order of the High Court or the Tribunal from which the appeal arose, merges with that of the Supreme Court. In such a case, the Supreme Court upholds the Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A | interest |
For the assessment year 1979-80, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee, which was a company, was borrowing large sums by paying interest at 15 per cent. per annum. This interest was claimed by the assessee as deductible Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A | interest |
In assessments of a director of the same company, for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82, the Income-tax Officer held that non-charging of interest on his debit balance with the company would amount to a perquisite in the hands of Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Appellate Tribunal |
---Reference---Finding of fact---Scope of jurisdiction of High Court---Appellate Tribunal is the final fact-finding Authority---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and arrive at a conclusion contrary to that of the Tribunal---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 143, 271 | High Court |
---Assessment---Tribunal considering evidence and holding certain amounts to the income of the assessee---Assessment was valid---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and hold at amounts did not form part of the assessee-s Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.256 & 271 | penalty orders |
---Penalty---Concealment of income---Tribunal upholding additions to income in quantum proceedings and consequently confirming penalty---High Court reconsidering evidence and deleting additions to income and penalty---High Court was not Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.11 & 13. | Exemption |
---Exemption---Firm---Partner entitled to exemption in respect of agricultural lands held by firm to extent of his share---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(iv). Held, that the assessee who was a Read More... |
2001 PTD 972 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(IA), 27(1) | Appellate Tribunal |
---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal can allow new ground to be raised before it---Question regarding valuation of property---Tribunal was justified in allowing Revenue to raise question whether property in Read More... |
2001 PTD 972 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Vs M. K. CHANDRAKANTH |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 4(1)(a) | Net wealth |
---Net wealth---Inclusions in net wealth---Assets transferred to minor child---Trust for benefit of minor child---Trust held irrevocable by High Court---Contributions to trust were not includible in net wealth of assessee---Indian Wealth Read More... |
2001 PTD 978 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SUNDARAM SPINNING MILLS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.24 | Depreciation |
---Depreciation---Initial depreciation---Higher rate of initial depreciation---Manufacture of textiles---Effect of Entry of Entry 21 of Ninth Sched.---Textiles would include yearn---Manufacture of yearn entitled to higher rate of initial Read More... |
2001 PTD 980 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs GOSLINO MARIO AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 9 | Income deemed to accrue |
---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Salary and allowances of foreign technician---Law applicable---Explanation to S.9(1)(ii) applicable only from 1-4-1979---Salary and allowances paid by Indian company to Italian concern for Read More... |
2001 PTD 985 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | sufficient cause |
---Appeal---Limitation---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of delay---Sufficient cause---Determination---Principles---Plea of “rush of work” for condonation of delay by no stretch of imagination was a “sufficient Read More... |
2001 PTD 1040 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
TANVIR ELAHI, DIRECTOR, ELAHI ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-13, COMPANIES ZONE-II LAHORE and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Bank |
---Ss.80-B read with First Sched., Part I, 50(2-A) & 30---Income from dividends and Bank deposits---Interpretation and scope of S.80-B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Assessee, an individual derived income from salary and Read More... |
2001 PTD 1032 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs NATIONAL REFINERY LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80 CC , 50(SA) | Rectification of mistake |
---Ss.80CC & 50(5A)---C.B.R. Circular No.14 of 1993, dated 19-8-1993---Tax on certain exporters---Assessee/exporter cannot be charged to tax under S.80CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 once the assessee/exporter establishes that Read More... |
2001 PTD 1030 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 35, 30 | Rectification of mistake |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss.156, 35 & 30---Rectification of mistake---Carry forward of business loss---Income from other sources---Interest income---Business income---Business loss---Carried forward---Set off against Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 1017 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs MESSRS DURATHENE MANUFACTURERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Affidavit |
---Ss.131, 148 & 158---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.129, illus. (e) & 1(2)---Appeal -Affidavit filed by the assessee assailing the consent assessment-----Provision of S.131, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 being mandatory in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1002 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs TRADE WINGS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40(c), 40A(5) | Ceiling on Expenditure |
Business expenditure---Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Expenditure resulting in remuneration, amenity or benefit to employee or Director---Scope of Ss.40(c) & 40A(5)---Expenditure should result in remuneration amenity or benefit to employee or Director in his Read More... |
2001 PTD 1666 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SHIRAZI INVESTMENT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 | fresh evidence/materia |
---Ss. 136 & 131---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Procedure---New or fresh evidence/material was not permissible to the brought on the record by the Appellate Tribunal at the stage of Second Appeal.Memoona Ahmed v. The A.C.I.T. 1998 Read More... |
2001 PTD 999 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Gross profit rate |
---Gross profit rate---Assessee, a manufacturer of ghee, cooking oil and soap---Declaration of loss by the assessee---Assessing Officer Applied 4% gross profit rate against the 5.81% and 3.82% declared rate for the previous Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | declared sale |
---Loss---Closure of business on account of loss---Declaration of sale for six months only---Addition---Addition was made by making comparison with the previous years---Validity---Assessing Officer was directed by the Tribunal to accept Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Different sale rate |
---Trading account---Defective accounts---Different sale rate for different parties---Admissibility---Reduced sale rate for one party as compared to the other parties---Rejection of account was upheld by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Declared Sale |
---Sale---Considerable improvement in sale as declared in the previous years---Assessee showed considerable improvement in the declared sales than the last two years---Assessing Officer estimated the sales---Validity---Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi Vs Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Trading Account |
---Trading account---Assessee, manufacturer of ghee and cooking oil etc.---Foreign exchange losses and leakage of material at customer;s store---Treatment---Principles---Charge of foreign exchange losses and leakage of goods at Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ORIENT PHARMA (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7)(a), 40A(7)(b), 40A(7)(b)(1), 40A(7)(b)(ii) | Gratuity |
----Business----expenditure---Disallowance---Gratuity---Conditions for allowance of provision for gratuity---Scope of S.40A(7)----No approved gratuity fund created in relevant previous year---No amount paid as gratuity during financial year----Deduction claimed not Read More... |
2001 PTD 1672 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Exemption |
Exemption from income-tax was not allowed to the assessee by the Tribunal---Appeal to High Court---Finding of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal that assessee, a Girls College, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot be sustained Read More... |
2001 PTD 987 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) . | Assessment |
---S.2(7)---Assessment---Assessment relating to each assessment year in an absolutely different and independent proceeding under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which does not permit the findings of a particular assessment year to be Read More... |
2001 PTD 987 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
Mansoor Ahmed, D.A. G./L.A. and Riaz Hussain Shah, D.R Vs |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(bb), 2(32), 22, 23, 23(1), 23(1)(xii), 23(1)(xiii), 23(1)(xiv), 23(1)(xv), 23(1)(xviii), Second Sched. | Welfare |
---S. 2(16)(bb), (32) & First Sched., Part I, para (A)---Company---Trust---Army welfare Trust---Status---Army Welfare Trust was previously carrying name of Army Welfare Projects Fund which was registered under the Societies Read More... |
2001 PTD 1243 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs KIRIT WOOD WORKS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 184, 185, 187, 188, 184(7), 184(8), 185(4) | Continuation of Registration |
Firm----Registration---Continuation of registration---Change in constitution of firm----Difference between dissolution of a firm and a change in its constitution---Application in Form No.11-A has to be filed in case of change in constitution of firm---Registration Read More... |
2001 PTD 1675 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE Vs MESSRS INTERHOME IMPERIAL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 10, 10(2)(xvi) | Allowable deduction |
S.10(2) (xvi)--- Interpretation of S, 10(2)(xvi), Income-tax Act, 1922--- Provision of S. 10(2)(xvi) of the Act only prohibited claiming and allowing of an expenditure which was in the nature of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1286 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) | Depreciation |
(a) Income-tax--- |
2001 PTD 1288 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, A-ZONE, LAHORE Vs SOHAIL ASLAM, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 58, 108, 110, 136 | Wealth Statement |
Wealth Statement---Non-compliance of requirement of filing wealth statement---Penalty---Validity---Penalty under S. 108 , Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for default in submitting wealth statement as required under S. 58 of the said advance Read More... |
2001 PTD 1325 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 37, 37(5) | Guest House |
Business expenditure---Depreciation---Guest house---Law applicable---Effect of introduction of subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from 1-4-1979---Subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from Read More... |
2001 PTD 1685 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION |
HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION 3 | Association of persons |
Wealth Tax---Charge of tax---Individual---Association of persons not liable to wealth tax as individual under S. 3--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.3. The expression “Individual” cannot Read More... |
2001 PTD 1328 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
STEEL EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION Vs RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 15, 17, 17(2), 192 | Salary |
Salary---Perquisite—House rent---Accommodation provided by employer—Perquisite only if rent charged by employer is concessional---Employer constructing houses in a particular location and rent charged rationalized---No concessional rent when all Read More... |
2001 PTD 1691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE. LAHORE Vs TAUHEED ELAHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 34, 26 | Casual gain |
Hyderogenated Vegetable Oil Industry Act (Control and Development) Act (LXV of 1973), S. 26---Reference to High Court---Scope—Assessee, an individual had shares in a limited company running the business of oil which was taken over Read More... |
2001 PTD 1329 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs INDIA CEMENTS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 154, 348,349 | Business Expenditure |
Business expenditure----Expenditure incurred in violation of another statue is no deductible---- amount paid to managing agent by company in excess of ceiling allowed under S.248 read with S.349 of Companies Act----Amount paid in excess was not deductible---Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 1698 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs N. NAZEERUDEEN |
Lottery Prize |
Wealth-tax---Net Wealth Lottery prize Dispute regarding ownership of Lottery Prize pending before High Court Assessee allowed to draw one-half of amount by giving Bank guarantee pending litigation on condition that amount to be refunded Read More... |
2001 PTD 1331 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE Vs ABU BAKAR MAQSOOD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d), 136 | Purchase of property |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) ---Ss. 136 & 13(1)(d) Reference to High Court Scope Purchase of property by assessee Estimation of value by the Revenue Authorities cancelled by the Tribunal Reasons which favoured with the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1333 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX Vs UNITED PROVINCES ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(iii), Expln. (2), (IA), Expln., 41, 41(2) |
Business Income Profits chargeable to tax Balancing charge When moneys payable “become due” Acquisition of electricity undertakings Compensation determined and paid by Government Moneys have become due Profits chargeable in Read More...
|
2001 PTD 1335 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD Vs ABDUL JABBAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched | Individual member of an A.O.P |
Reference to the High Court Scope Individual member of an A.O.P. had disclosed the source of income which was claimed to be exempted Assessing Officer on the basis of the fact that the source had been allowed only part of the income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1348 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE Vs MESSRS PUNJAB FLOUR MILLING CORPORATION LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10(29) | Levy |
Surcharge, Levy of Retained income Taxes payable could be treated as retained income for the purpose of levy of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1409 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD Vs ABDUL JABBAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched | Penalty |
Concealment of income Penalty Claims as share of exempt income was made by the assessee which was finally accepted in appeal penalty for concealment Validity to prefer a claim for exemption of certain amount which was partially Read More... |
2001 PTD 1348 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
DALMIA DAIRY INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY DALMIA CEMENT LTD) Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Business Expenditure |
Capital or revenue expenditure---Sale of factories in Pakistan---Sale consideration to be satisfied by export of cement----Cement not supplied---Litigation expenses for realising value of cement and interest thereon---Not deductible as business Read More... |
2001 PTD 1706 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 18(1)(a), 15, 14(1), 17(1) | Penalty |
Wealth Tax: Penalty Failure to file returns in time HUF Finding in income tax assessment proceedings that a certain amount did not belong to HUG finding upheld by High Court penalty could not e levied for failure to file wealth tax Read More...
|
2001 PTD 1351 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs LAKSHMI MACHINE WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(2A) | Business Expenditure |
(a)Income-tax--- |
2001 PTD 1712 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAWALPINDI ZONE; RAWALPINDI Vs MESSRS HEAVY MECHA |