Court | Year | Petitioner | Law/Section | Topic | Case Law | Citation/Ref. | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS Messrs MILLAT TRACTORS LIMITED, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111,122 | Unexplained income or assets |
----Ss. 111 & 122 (as it existed prior to amendment by the Finance Act, 2020)---Unexplained income or assets---Amendment of an assessment---Notices issued under Sections 111 & 122(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ("Ordinance")---Whether a separate notice Read More... |
2024 PTD 483 2024 SCMR 700 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS Messrs MILLAT TRACTORS LIMITED, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111,122 | Proceedings under Section 111(1) |
Before an assessment can be amended under Section 122 on the basis of Section 111, the proceedings under Section 111(1) are to be initiated, the taxpayer is to be confronted with the information and the grounds applicable under Section 111(1) through a separate Read More... |
2024 PTD 483 2024 SCMR 700 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS Messrs MILLAT TRACTORS LIMITED, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111,122 | Notice and proceedings under Section 111 |
----Ss. 111, Explanation & 122---Explanation introduced in Section 111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ('Ordinance') pursuant to the Finance Act, 2021---Effect---On a plain reading of the said Explanation, it appears that it is couched in clarificatory and Read More... |
2024 PTD 483 2024 SCMR 700 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS Messrs MILLAT TRACTORS LIMITED, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111,122 | Explanation to an enactment |
----Explanation to an enactment---Rationale and scope---Purpose of an Explanation is ordinarily to explain some concept or expression or phrase occurring in the main provision---It is not uncommon for the legislature to accord either an extended or restricted Read More... |
2024 PTD 483 2024 SCMR 700 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS Messrs MILLAT TRACTORS LIMITED, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111,122 | Retrospective and prospective application of law |
----Retrospective and prospective application of law---Principles---A change in substantive law which divests and adversely affects vested rights of the parties shall always have prospective application unless by express word of the legislation and/or by necessary Read More... |
2024 PTD 483 2024 SCMR 700 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
SOOFI MUHAMMAD FARRUKH AMIN AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF FINANCE REVENUE DIVISION, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, STATISTICS AND REVENUE, PAKISTAN SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 116 Income Support Levy Act, 2013 Ss. 2 (1)(a),3,9 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 73(1) & 189 Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972 Ss. 3 | Income Support Levy |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----S. 116---Income Support Levy Act, 2013, Ss. 2(1)(a), 3 & 9---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 73(1) & 189---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S.3---Intra Court Appeal---Judgment of Supreme Court--Leave to appeal Read More... |
2024 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
SOOFI MUHAMMAD FARRUKH AMIN AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF FINANCE REVENUE DIVISION, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, STATISTICS AND REVENUE, PAKISTAN SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.116 Income Support Levy Act, 2013, Ss. 2(1)(a), 3 & 9 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 73(1) & 189 Law Reforms Ordinance 1972 S. 3 | Income Support Levy |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----S.116---Income Support Levy Act, 2013, Ss. 2(1)(a), 3 & 9---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 73(1) & 189---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3---Intra Court Appeal---Judgment of Supreme Court---Leave to appeal Read More... |
2024 PTD 406 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.113, 120 & 122(5A) | Minimum tax, charging of |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss.113, 120 & 122(5A)---Turnover---Sale of assets and scrap---Scope---Company deriving income from telecom and broadband services--- Minimum tax, charging of---Scope---Officer Inland Revenue charged the taxpayer/company Read More... |
2024 PTD 358 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.113(3)(a), 120 & 122(5A) | Minimum tax, charging of |
Ss.113(3)(a), 120 & 122(5A)---Turnover---Sale of assets and scrap---Scope---Company deriving income from telecom and broadband services---Minimum tax, charging of---Officer Inland Revenue charged the taxpayer/ company minimum tax on sale of assets and scrap Read More... |
2024 PTD 358 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.15, 15-A, 16, 67, 120 & 122(5A) Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.13 | Income from property |
Ss.15, 15-A, 16, 67, 120 & 122(5A)---Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.13---Income from property---Allocation of expenses---Scope---Company deriving income from telecom and broadband services---Officer Inland Revenue allocated the taxpayer/company expenses relatable to Read More... |
2024 PTD 358 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 15, 15A, 16, 30, 67, 113, 113(3), 113(3)(a), 120, 122(5A), 127 | Income from other sources---Dividend |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----Ss.30, 113, 120 & 122(5A)---Income from other sources---Dividend---Allocation of expenses---Scope---Company deriving income from telecom and broadband services---If the assesse incurs any expenditure for earning of Read More... |
2024 PTD 358 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.37, 120 & 122(5A) | Exempt capital gain |
Ss.37, 120 & 122(5A)---Income from capital gain---Allocation of expenses to exempt capital gain---Scope---Taxpayer being a company deriving income from telecom and broadband services---Department assailed order passed by the Commissioner before the Appellate Read More... |
2024 PTD 358 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS ATTA CABLES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 118, 119, 119(3), 177, 214A, 214D, 214D(3), 214D(4) | selection for audit |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S. 214D [since omitted]---Automatic selection for audit---Scope---In the ordinary course, and in terms of other provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ('the Ordinance'), selection for audit is not automatic but is a result Read More... |
2024 PTD 321 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS ATTA CABLES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214D | selection for audit |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----S. 214D [since omitted]---Automatic selection for audit---Scope---Taxpayer had not filed its return for tax year 2015 within the date required---Date for filing the return was 21.01.2016---On that date the Read More... |
2024 PTD 321 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION) LEGAL TAXPAYERS UNIT, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS KHUDADAD HEIGHTS, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(5) & 133(1) | Definite information |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 122(5) & 133(1)---Reference---Reassessment---Definite information---Scope---Reassessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of bank statement of respondent / taxpayer---In view of the entries reflected in such bank Read More... |
2024 PTD 309 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
SUFI ABDUL QADEER AND 2 OTHERS VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 216 Specific Relief Act 1877 S.42 | Disclosure of information by a public servant |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----S. 216---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42---Suit for declaration etc.---Disclosure of information by a public servant---Bar contained in S. 216 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Scope---During the proceedings before the Read More... |
2024 PTD 299 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
LAHORE TAX BAR ASSOCIATION VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 130, 130(2) | Appointment of Chairperson and Members |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------S.130---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (Appointment of Chairperson and Members) Rules, 2020---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 240 & 242---Constitutional petition---Appointment of Chairman---Appellate Tribunal Inland Read More... |
2024 PTD 281 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
MESSRS URBAN DEVELOPERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 | Rectification application |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S.221---Rectification application---Maintainability---Matter sub-judice---Effect---While the Reference Application filed by the taxpayer (company/developers) was pending before the High Court, rectification application was moved Read More... |
2024 PTD 270 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
CHINA MACHINERY ENGINEERING CORPORATION, PAKISTAN BRANCH VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 138,140 | recovery of tax due from its bank accounts |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----Ss.138 & 140---Recovery of tax due---Coercive measures--- Principle---Petitioner / taxpayer assailed recovery of tax due from its bank accounts by authorities---Plea raised by petitioner / taxpayer was that such recovery Read More... |
2024 PTD 242 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS NORDEX SINGAPORE EQUIPMENT LIMITED VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, CIR AND FFC ENERGY LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S2(41),122A,122B, 152,153,206 | Remedy of revision |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----Ss. 2 (41), 122A, 122B, 152, 153 & 206---Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.231-A---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition--- Avoidance of Double Taxation Treaty---Offshore company---Petitioner was an offshore Read More... |
2024 PTD 208 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
MESSRS SARDAR WALI KHAN CARRIAGE CONTRACTOR VILLAGE ZITOOR, CHITRAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.148,159 | Exemption from income tax |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss.148 & 159---Exemption from income tax---Petitioner was a government carriage contractor and running its business in erstwhile Tribal Areas, who sought tax exemption being resident of erstwhile Tribal Read More... |
2024 PTD 201 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
Messrs SIKANDAR & CO. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 138(1) | Interim order in tax |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S.138(1)---Workers' Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971), S.4(9)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Interim order in tax or revenue matters---Scope---Petitioner sought judicial review of a public action taken by the FBR Read More... |
2024 PTD 188 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) INLAND REVENUE VS Messrs KOHINOOR SOAP AND DETERGENTS (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133,221,239 | Tax adjustment |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--Ss.133, 221 & 239---Reference---Tax adjustment---Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue justifying tax claim entitlement of taxpayer---Validity---Provision of S.239(15) of Income Tax Read More... |
2024 PTD 162 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE VS UNIQUE CYCLE INDUSTRY |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.133(1)-Notification SRO No.670(I)/2013, dated 18-7-2013 | Input/output ratios |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--S.133 (1)---Notification SRO No.670(I)/2013, dated 18-7-2013---Reference---Concessions, grant of---Principle---Input/output ratios of manufacturer---Determination---Dispute was with regard to grant of concession under Read More... |
2024 PTD 158 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL ZONE CORPORATIVE TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD VS Messrs T.F. PIPES LIMITED COMPANY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.174,161,133 Income Tax Rules, 2001 Ss. 44(4) | Failure to provide record/information |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 174, 161 & 133---Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4)---Failure to provide record/information---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Withholding obligations---Scope---Tax Department contended that the proceedings were Read More... |
2024 PTD 129 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
IN C.A. 815/2016: MEMBER (TAXES) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. QAISER ABBAS
IN C.A. 816/2016: MEMBER (TAXES), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. SYED FAKHAR RIAZ
IN C.A. 817/2016: MEMBER (TAXES), BOARD OF REVENUE PUJNAB, LAHORE, ETC. V. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD
IN C.A. 818/2016: MEMBER (T VS QAISER ABBAS AND OTHERS |
Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997 (I of 1997) 3(1),3B,4(1)(4) | Agriculture Income |
Application of Section 3B of the Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997 is based upon the agricultural income as declared by the assesse himself in his income tax return under the Ordinance. In this context, it is worthy to reiterate Section 3(1) of the Punjab Read More... |
2019 PTD 826 (2019) 119 TAX 370 2019 PTCL 211 2019 SCMR 446 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
RIZWAN ALI SAYAL VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 130(3) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Public functionaries |
Public functionaries---Appointment---Fitness to hold public office---First Information Report, registeration of---Acquittal on basis of compromise---Mere registration of FIR against any person cannot be used as a definitive test to label him as having a bad Read More... |
2024 PTD 32 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
RIZWAN ALI SAYAL VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 130(3) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Quo warranto |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S. 130(3)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Quo warranto---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue---Judicial Member, appointment of---Pre-conditions---Involvement in criminal case---Effect---Petitioner Read More... |
2024 PTD 32 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 199 | Recovery proceedings---Appeal pending |
Taxation---Recovery proceedings---Appeal pending---Stay of recovery proceedings during pendency of appeal---Petitioner sought a direction to the respondent to decide its pending appeal and, in the meanwhile, restrain the department from initiating recovery Read More... |
2024 PTD 30 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
OUTFITTERS STORES (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, FBR AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.175,177,175(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Code 1898 Ss.103 Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.11 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 Ss.199 | full and free access |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S. 175(1)(a)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 103---Expression "full and free access"---Scope---Raid, search and impounding of documents---Jurisdiction---Expression "full and free access" employed in S. 175 (1)(a) of Read More... |
2024 PTD 8 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
OUTFITTERS STORES (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, FBR AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.175,177,175(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Code 1898 Ss.103 Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.11 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 Ss.199 | Raid , search |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 175 & 177---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S.11---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Authorization Order---Raid, search and impounding of documents---Jurisdiction---Petitioner company was Read More... |
2024 PTD 8 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
OUTFITTERS STORES (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, FBR AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.175,177,175(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Code 1898 Ss.103 Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.11 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 Ss.199 | Judicial review |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----S. 175---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Authorization Order---Judicial review---Scope---It is not for High Court to pass any direction when remedy is available under S. 175(5) of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2024 PTD 8 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
OUTFITTERS STORES (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, FBR AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.175,177,175(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Code 1898 Ss.103 Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.11 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 Ss.199 | Maxim Absoluta sentential |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----S. 175---Authorization Order---Maxim Absoluta sentential expositore non indiget---Applicability---Provisions of laws from different fiscal statutes cannot be read as part of S.175 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which is Read More... |
2024 PTD 8 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, WITHHOLDING TAX ZONE, RTO, MULTAN VS MESSRS SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.161 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4) | withholding tax/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted. |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted----payment for goods, services and contracts----Scope----Case against taxpayer related to non-deduction/non-payment of withholding tax which surfaced violation of the provisions of Ss.153 & 161 of the ITO Read More... |
2023 PTD 524 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS VS THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | collecting agent/ advance tax |
Constitutional matter, decision of---Principle---Cardinal principle while exercising Constitutional jurisdiction is that courts should abstain from deciding a Constitutional question, if a case could be decided on other or narrower Read More... |
2023 PTD 527 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND OTHERS VS THE FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | Headings/Object, purpose and scope |
Headings---Object, purpose and scope----Headings do not control meaning and do not define its scope---Headings may assist in interpretation of a section, if words appear to be doubtful, however, they cannot restrict plain words of the Read More... |
2023 PTD 527 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 147(7), 147(8), 161, 161(1B), 162, 162(2), 174(3) | Tax due-Recovery /tax liability / paid/discharged |
Constitutional petition-Tax due-Recovery--- Reconciliation--- Dispute was with regard to notice of recovery of tax due issued under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Rational in S. 161 (1B) of ITO 2001, was that a tax liable to be Read More... |
2023 PTD 541 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS SOHAIL STEEL GL SHEET COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148, 159 | Exemption/ raw material imported |
Sales tax at import stage-Exemption from income tax-Petitioners were running their manufacturing units in erstwhile Provincially Administered Tribal Areas, who sought tax exemption over raw material imported by them---Clause No. 146 of Read More... |
2023 PTD 556 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131 | annulled |
Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal---Stay of proceedings--- Scope-Appellant/assessee sought stay of proceedings in consequence of an order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals)--- --Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had annulled the order of the Read More... |
2023 PTD 567 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, ISLAMABAD (IESCO) |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 161, 174 | production of tax records/ Failure to pay tax collected or deducted |
Tax demand-Record, maintenance of--Limitation- Failure to pay tax collected or deducted-Authorities issued notice for recovery of tax for the period beyond six years---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside the demand created by tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 569 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD and others VS HAMEEDA BEGUM and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 136 | Assessment---Oral gift |
Assessment---Oral gift-Non-registration of gift declaration--Authorities were aggrieved of accepting unregistered oral gift of immovable property held by assessee---Gift deed executed under Transfer of Property Act, 1882, was required to be registered compulsorily Read More... |
2023 PTD 603 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Super tax/ vires of--charging section |
Super tax, vires of--Charging section-Retrospective effect Property rights-Petitioners / taxpayers sought striking down of S.4B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, on the plea that charging section could not be retrospective in Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Interpretation of statutes/ Amendment/ Inconsistency/ Taxing statute |
Amendment-Inconsistency--Scope-Law accepts that amendment becomes a part of original statute and both ought to be construed together-In case of any inconsistency, harmonization may be employed so as to impede an irreconcilable Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL COUNSEL AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Constitution of Pakistan | Discrimination-Reasonable classification |
Discrimination-Reasonable classification, principle of Scope-Provision of Art. 25 of the Constitution envisages equality between citizens, however it allows for differential treatment of persons not similarly placed under a reasonable Read More... |
2023 PTD 607 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 | Audit/ Selection of case for audit |
Selection of case for audit-Word reasons - Scope--Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of letter and notices issued by authorities selecting its case for audit----Word reason connotes an expression giving justification for an action, a ground to explain something, a Read More... |
2023 PTD 649 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 25, 177 | release of vehicle/ forensic report |
Reference---Redemption fine---Release of vehicle-- Tampered chasis number---Authorities were aggrieved of release of vehicle which was confiscated for smuggling of petrol---Customs Appellate Tribunal released the vehicle on deposit of 20% redemption fine---Vehicle Read More... |
2023 PTD 649 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS SAJID PLASTIC FACTORY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Import Policy Order, 2020 Clause 8, Notification SRO 902(I)/2020 dated 25-09-2020 | Sample of imported goods |
Petitioner / importer was aggrieved of his consignment not being released by Custom Authorities, despite its clearance—Plea raised by petitioner was that the consignment was importable under SRO 902(I)/2020 dated 25-09-2020—Validity—When Read More... |
2023 PTD 1701 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 22 & 23 | Bad debts |
Income from business and profession—Deductions— Bad debts—Scope—While claiming any income from any business and profession, under S. 22 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, certain expenditures under S. 23 are allowable—Section 23(1)(x) Read More... |
2023 PTD 1671 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ZAM ZAM LPG (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.18, 79(1)(e), 122(4) (5A), 133 & 166(1)(a) | housing scheme |
Tax exemption-Adventure in nature of trade---Scope---Taxpayer was an industrial unit and sold its land by converting it into a housing scheme and earned profit----For an adventure in nature of trade there had to be "indicia of trade" Read More... |
2023 PTD 689 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 22 & 23 | Bad debts |
Income from business and profession—Deductions— Bad debts—Scope—Assessee is required to give the names of the account holders and amounts considered as bad debt in each case, as may be indicated in a certificate issued by the State Bank of Read More... |
2023 PTD 1671 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 S.8 | Instructions of the CBR, now FBR |
All officers to follow the orders of the Central Board of Revenue—Scope—Instructions of the CBR, now FBR, issued from time to time are binding upon the departmental authorities under S. 8 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2023 PTD 1671 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
DAWAT SARAYE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 14(1), 14(2), 13(2), 3(1A), 3(5), Sixth Sched., Serial No. 53, Table 2 | Registration number | Exempted |
Registration number, not obtained—Exempted supplies— Further tax and extra tax was charged from the petitioner in the electricity bill for “not obtaining registration number " as well as “not being active taxpayer"—Petitioner invoked Read More... |
2023 PTD 1667 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2023 |
MIAN FEROZE SALAH UD DIN VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 121(3) & 131 | Best judgment assessment—Limitation |
Best judgment assessment—Limitation—Scope— Order passed by the Officer Inland Revenue against the taxpayer was confirmed by the Commissioner Appeals—Objection of the appellant / taxpayer was that the order passed by the Officer Inland Revenue Read More... |
2023 PTD 1662 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2023 |
MIAN FEROZE SALAH UD DIN VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.132, 131 & 121 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 189 | Judgments of the Supreme Court |
Judgments of the Supreme Court—Binding on all Courts—Best judgment assessment—Limitation—Officer Inland Revenue passed order against the taxpayer after passing of 5 years of relevant tax-year, however, the same was confirmed by the Read More... |
2023 PTD 1662 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | advance tax |
Scope-Purpose of advance tax is collection of tax in advance and its adjustment at later stage but not charging or levy of tax-For collection of advance tax, certain persons are obliged, by the Statute, to collect and deposit the same in Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Non-obstante clause |
Interpretation of statutes-----Non-obstante clause---Meaning and scope---Expression "Non-obstante" in Latin terminology connotes 'notwithstanding anything contained'---Said phrase, for all intents and purposes invests powers in the legislature to set down any Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | imposition and recovery default surcharge |
Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Scope-Provisions of S.162(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 regarding imposition and recovery of default surcharge etc. are only attracted where failure to deduct tax is Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | Annual statement of tax collected or deducted |
Advance tax-Annual statement of tax collected or deducted-Scope--Practice of calling reconciliation, in absence of any statement, is against the spirit of R.44 of the Income Tax Rules, 2002-Rule 44 envisages, unequivocally, that Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, LAHORE
VS M/S MARWAT ENTERPRISES PVT. LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 161,161(1B), 162, 162(2) | Show-cause notice/Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice |
Advance tax---Failure to pay tax deducted or collected---Default surcharge, recovery of-Show-cause notice, issuance of---Principles and pre- requisites for issuing a show notice under Ss. 161 & 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2023 PTD 732 2023 PTCL 85 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA
VS MESSRS CRYSTAL DISTRIBUTORS, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(d), 122(1), 128(5), 129, 129(1)(a), 132, 132(3)(c), 133, 133(5) | Remanding of the matter |
Reference--Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue---Powers---Remanding of the matter---Object, purpose and scope-Taxpayer assailed assessment order and Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) remanded the matter to Assessing Officer for de novo Read More... |
2023 PTD 758 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
VS PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) | Penalty for concealment of income |
Assessment on production of accounts, evidence, etc. Penalty for concealment of income---Scope---During the assessment proceedings, the taxation officer alleged that certain expenses claimed by the respondent were false and inaccurate Read More... |
2023 PTD 773 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
VS PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62, 111, 111(2)(b) | Penalty for concealment of income |
Penalty for concealment of income--Scope----Mens rea-----Scope----Existence of mens rea is a mandatory condition for levying any penalty under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Burden to prove such act of an assessee is also on Read More... |
2023 PTD 773 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS ADAM JEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 153(1)(b) & 149(3) as inserted by Finance Act, 2014 | Payment of salaries by the employer to its employees |
Payment of salaries by the employer to its employees—Deduction of tax at source—Payments for services—Director’s fee—Deduction of tax— Among the salaries paid by the taxpayer (company), Officer Inland Revenue taxed the payments on Read More... |
2023 PTD 1628 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS FAUJI FOUNDATION LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979[since repealed] Ss. 22 & 30 | Income from interest on Bank deposits |
Fauji Foundation—Income from interest on Bank deposits—Whether such income is to be considered and taxed as 'income from other sources’ or as ‘income from business’—Held, that respondent-taxpayer/ Fauji Foundation is a welfare Read More... |
2023 PTD 1590 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
VS MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 | Rectification/ incorrect assessment |
Assessment giving effect to an order---Rectification of mistakes--Scope---According to S.124 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the assessing officer must adhere to the directions given in the appeal effect order and cannot make any Read More... |
2023 PTD 789 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS FAUJI FOUNDATION LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed] Ss. 22 & 30 | Income from other sources’ |
Income from other sources’ or ‘income from business’—Determination—In cases where the dispute relates to determining whether its business income or income from other sources, the facts have to be duly considered so as to determine the Read More... |
2023 PTD 1590 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, FAISALABAD
VS MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS, LTD., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistakes-Scope of rectification is limited to correcting mistakes that are easily identifiable on the surface of the order. |
2023 PTD 789 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
Mian AZAM WAHEED and 2 others VS The COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Additional Collector of Customs, Karachi |
Income Tax Ordinance | Interim order |
Interim order---Principles—No interlocutory order survives after the original proceeding comes to an end—Interim orders are made in the aid of the final order that the court may pass and they merge into the final order and do not survive after the final Read More... |
2023 PTD 1571 (2023) 128 TAX 61 2023 PTCL 691 2023 SCMR 1247 2023 PLC 510 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-II, NEW INCOME TAX BUILDING, SHAHRAH-E-KAMAL ATTATURK, KARACHI AND ANOTHER VS MESSRS PAK SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD., KARACHI THROUGH M.D. |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979) [since repealed] S. 80-C Contract Act 1872, S. 182 Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), Ss. 19 & 20— | Presumptive tax regime |
Presumptive tax regime—Fertilizer manufacturing company and marketing company—Whether principal- agent relationship—Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that as marketing company was an agent of the fertilizer manufacturing company, hence, keeping in Read More... |
2023 PTD 1550 2023 SCP 193 2023 PTCL 839 2023 SCMR 1595 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MUHAMMAD ANWAR VS PAKISTAN through Secretary to the Government of Pakistan Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 6 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S. 162 | Damages, recovery / Civil suit |
Damages, recovery of—Civil suit—Maintainability— Negligence of authorities—Quantum of loss, determination of—Mental shock, agony and torture—Proof—Plaintiff claimed that ship purchased by him for breaking sank near shore and Read More... |
2023 PTD 1519 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) | International tax conventions, agreements or treaties |
International tax conventions, agreements or treaties-----Interpretation----Reasons as to why treaty interpretation rules differ from domestic tax rules stated. International tax conventions or Read More... |
2023 PTD 863 2023 PTCL 722 2023 SCMR 1055 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 192, 192A, 194 & 199 Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 Ss. 2 (xviii), 3, 8, 9 & Schedule-1—Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 12 & 199— | Money laundering offence |
Money laundering—Investigation—Predicate offence—Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation (I&I), Inland Revenue—Status—Petitioners were aggrieved of investigation of offence of money laundering by Directorate (I&I), Inland Read More... |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SNAMPROGETTI ENGINEERING B.V. through Special Attorney VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, L.T.U, ISLAMABAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 107, 107(2)(c), 122(5A), 122(9) | Conventions/ Exemption/ permanent establishment |
Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income ("Convention"), Arts. 5 & Read More... |
2023 PTD 863 2023 PTCL 722 2023 SCMR 1055 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010)——S. 9 Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)— | Call-up notice |
Call-up notice—Ingredients—Call-up notice must at the bare minimum specify information regarding alleged commission of offence of money laundering and details of property which has allegedly been acquired from proceeds of crime or contravention of any Read More... |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010) S. 8 & 9 | Inquiry and investigation |
Inquiry and investigation—Non-framing of rules— Effect—Process for inquiry/investigation under Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 and Standard Operating Procedure is expansive and envisages rigorous and intrusive regime that does not warrant any Read More... |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Rules, framing of |
Rules, framing of—Scope—Where Legislature intends that rules are required to be framed for a certain function under the statute to be performed or carried out, it makes provision for it by requiring it to be done through the prescribed Read More... |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 4(1) Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 Ss. 8 & 9— | Investigation |
Investigation—Scope—Investigation of cognizable offence or non-cognizable offence has reference to procedure which does not affect substantive rights of accused. |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
ABDUL SABOOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 154 | FIR-First Information Report |
First Information Report—Object, purpose and scope— Principal objective of F.I.R. is to set the law in motion for initiation of investigation by police officer for the purpose of collecting evidence relating to crime. |
2023 PTD 1434 2023 SLD 2092 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
FAIRDEAL EXCHANGE COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR OF COMPANY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 20, 122(9), 171(1), 177(7), 214C | Audit Selection Regime |
Constitutional petition-Audit Selection Regime--Petitioners / taxpayers were aggrieved of selection of their cases for Audit----Selection for audit under S. 177(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, by Commissioner Inland Revenue was not Read More... |
2023 PTD 919 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD AFZAL CHEEMA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(2),133,214A | Limitation, extension of |
Federal Board of Revenue Notification C. No. 3 (22) S (IR-Operations) 2020, dated 30-06-2020---Reference---Assessment, amendment of---Limitation, extension of---Principle---Word "finalization"---Connotation---Extension of limitation by authorities in view of Read More... |
2023 PTD 953 (2023) 128 TAX 244 2023 PLD 953 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SERVICE GLOBAL FOOTWEAR LIMITED and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001 Ss. 2(42), 4, 4C, 80, 114, 120, First Sched. | Vires of Super Tax |
Chap. V, Part-I, Division-I First Proviso, Division-II B [as inserted by Finance Act, 2022]---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 25 199---Constitutional petition---Vires of Super Tax---Discrimination---Term person---Textualism, doctrine Read More... |
2023 PTD 1120 (2023) 128 TAX 90 2023 PLD 471 2023 SLD 1922 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SERVICE GLOBAL FOOTWEAR LIMITED and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 74 | Tax years |
Tax year---Types---Special tax year---Scope---There are two types of tax years; one is normal tax year while the other is special tax year---Period of both of tax years in terms of S. 74 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is twelve months---Availing special tax year Read More... |
2023 PTD 1120 (2023) 128 TAX 90 2023 PLD 471 2023 SLD 1922 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SERVICE GLOBAL FOOTWEAR LIMITED and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute---Textualism, doctrine of---Scope---Doctrine of Textualism envisages a method of statutory interpretation that asserts a statute should be interpreted according to its plain meaning and not according to the intent of the legislature, the statutory Read More... |
2023 PTD 1120 (2023) 128 TAX 90 2023 PLD 471 2023 SLD 1922 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SERVICE GLOBAL FOOTWEAR LIMITED and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 25 | Discrimination |
Discrimination---Intelligible differentia, doctrine of---Applicability---Differential treatment of persons who are not similarly placed has been allowed under Art. 25 of the Constitution, under reasonable classification---In order to justify such difference in Read More... |
2023 PTD 1120 (2023) 128 TAX 90 2023 PLD 471 2023 SLD 1922 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS CGGC-DESCON JOINT VENTURE THROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, LAHORE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S. S3 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 247 [as amended by 25th Constitutional Amendment]--Notification SRO 1213(I)/2018 dated 05-10-2018- Constitutional petition | Tax exemption |
Constitutional petition--Tax exemption--Consent of parties--Residents of erstwhile Federally Administered Tribal Area-- Proof--Petitioner company, a partner of joint venture, sought exemption from payment of tax under Notification SRO 1213(I)/2018 dated 05-10-2018, Read More... |
2023 PTD 1323 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE VS MESSRS ADAM JEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 233, 158(c), 161 & 205 | Brokerage and Commission/ Insurance companies |
Brokerage and Commission—Advance tax, deduction of—Insurance companies, business of—Collection of premium—Principal and agent, relationship of—Commissioner Appeals deleted the liability under the commission under S. 233 of Income Tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 1628 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS MESSRS PAK LAND TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.133, 115(4), 169(1)(b) 233(3) as amended by Finance Act, 2004]-- CBR’s Circular No. 7 of 2004 dated 1-7-2004 | Advance tax | Presumptive tax regime | Final tax |
|
2023 PTD 1342 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
MUMTAZ ALI RAJPAR AND BROTHERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER AND OTHERS
VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(2), 236(A) | Royalty/ Failure to pay tax collected |
Advance tax at the time of sale by auction---Royalty collection---Contractual liability---Petitioner were engaged in carrying out Read More... |
2023 PTD 39 2023 PTCL 329 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-X, RTO-III, LAHORE
VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL, PROP. BRIGHT STAR ENGINEERING WORKS, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(d), 170, 122 | Refund/ Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Scope---Assessing authority while observing difference between the purchases declared in the Read More... |
2023 PTD 96 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Minimum tax/ Distributor/ Certificates |
Question before Appellate Tribunal was whether the statues of taxpayer was of a Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Fast moving consumer goods |
Minimum tax----Distributor---Fast moving consumer goods----Scope----Question before Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Fast moving consumer goods |
First moving consumer goods---Scope----Definition of fast moving consumer goods reflects Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
NAEEM RAFIQUE BHATTI, GUJRANWALA
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(22A), 113, First Schedule | Decisions of Supreme Court |
Decisions of Supreme Court binding on other Courts---Decision of High Court binding on Read More... |
2023 PTD 134 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
MUBASHIR YAMEEN
VS ASSISTANT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(1), 137(2), 138, 140 | Attachment / recovery of tax amount |
Recovery of tax out of property and through arrest of taxpayer---Recovery of tax from persons holding Read More... |
2023 PTD 146 2023 PTCL 423 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MUHAMMAD TAHIR VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ABBOTTABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170 | Tribal Area/President Order prior to levy tax |
Resident of a Provincially Administered Tribal Area adjoining Mansehra District (the 'said tribal area')-Income tax refund, claim Read More... |
2023 PTD 163 2023 PTCL 396 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
M. SARWAR SONS, HAFIZABAD
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 121, 122 | Unexplained income or assets/ separate notice |
Non-issuance of separate notice-Effect-Appellant was aggrieved of certain additions made by assessing officer in his income under Read More... |
2023 PTD 167 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS M/S LAHORE RUBBER STORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47(5), 57 | Rectification / ex-parte order |
Taxpayer was a retailer who was treated as manufacturer for the purposes of taxation--- Taxpayer sought rectification of ex-parte Read More... |
2023 PTD 182 2023 PTCL 555 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 | Amendment of assessment/ Seeking information from assessee |
Amendment of assessment---Seeking information from assessee-Scope-In case, if Assessing Authority comes across any information or Read More... |
2023 PTD 186 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
RELIANCE PETROCHEM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 177 | Amendment of assessment/ show-cause notice |
Amendment of assessment---Opinion already formed Scope---Taxpayer company was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Read More... |
2023 PTD 186 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D | Tax, imposition |
Object, purpose and scope---Tax cannot be expropriatory or confiscatory, which takes away a citizen's property without Read More... |
2023 PTD 223 (2023)127 TAX 363 2023 PTCL 40 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
RAO TARIQ ISLAM, ETC. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 236D | advance income tax &un-adjustable advance income tax |
Tax, imposition of Amendment, vires of---Petitioners assailed amendment in S.236D of ITO 2001, fixing Rs.20,000 - as minimum slab for advance income tax to be collected of a person receiving services of or holding arranging functions in Read More... |
2023 PTD 223 (2023)127 TAX 363 2023 PTCL 40 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
SYNTHETIC PRODUCTS ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND OTHERS VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(2A), 122, 122(1), 122(5), 122(5A), 138(1), 168(2), 168(5), 170(3), 170(3)(a) | adjustment of Workers Welfare Fund (WWF) / deemed assessment /adjustments of incorrect claim |
Recovery---Refund, determining of-System generated notice, non-issuance of---Dispute was with regard to adjustment of Workers Read More... |
2023 PTD 252 (2023)127 TAX 233 2023 PTCL 482 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS TASNEEM AKHTAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 122(6A), 133 | Agriculture income / past and closed transaction |
Agriculture income---Late payment-Penalty, imposing of-Principle-Authorities sought recovery of tax under S.111 of Income Tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 312 2023 PTCL 543 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
M/S ASKARI BANK LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49, 161(1A), 205 | Exemption from deduction of withholding tax |
Show- cause notice, assailing of---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---Failure to pay tax, collected or Read More... |
2023 PTD 316 (2022)126 TAX 452 2023 PTCL 53 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Income of trust / Tax exemption |
Overriding title-Applicant/Trust sought exemption on the plea that its income was diverted by virtue of overriding title of Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Income of trust / Tax exemption |
Cooperative Society---Status---Society is a juristic person and body incorporated and formed under Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Welfare activities/onus on taxpayer |
In relation to “income from business as is expended in Pakistan for Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Profit margin/ determination/ Taxation officer, discretion |
Profit margin----Determination-----Taxation officer, discretion of----Scope----Taxation officer has no discretion to determine in Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS ARMY WELFARE TRUST, RAWALPINDI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.2(29), 9, 10, 11, 80(2)(b)(v), 133 & Second Sched., Part-1, Cl.58(2)(1) | Bad debts |
Pre-condition----For purpose of any tax year in relation to which either Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 or Read More... |
2023 PTD 351 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II) LTU, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PAKISTAN LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 221 | Rectification of mistakes |
Commissioner issued an exemption for the purposes of S. 152(5-A) allowing the respondent to make certain payments to a foreign Read More... |
2023 PTD 390 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE VS Messrs PAKISTAN WAPDA FOUNDATION, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Rectification of mistakes |
Rectification of mistakes--Doctrine of election-Scope---Against the order of the Appellate Tribunal, Read More... |
2023 PTD 424 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, (RTO) Lahore VS MIAN LIAQAT ALI PROPRIETOR, LIAQAT HOSPITAL, Lahore |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 39, 111, 111(1)(d), 122, 122(5), 122(8), 122(9) | Concealment of income |
Concealment of business income from sales-Amendment of deemed assessment Read More... |
2023 PTD 435 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Annexure "F" of ST return (carry forward summary) /closing stock |
Unexplained income or assets-Stock-in-trade vis-à-vis Annex "F" of sales tax return (carry forward summary)--Scope--- Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Power of Commissioner (Appeals) |
Language of S.129(1)(a) only empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to confirm, modify or annul the Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | modify or annul |
Decision in appeal---Remand--Scope---Where matter in issue is an assessment order then resort can Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 35, 111, 111(1)(b), 111(1)(c), 122, 129, 129(1), 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) | Remand |
Decision in appeal-Remand-Scope--Order passed under S. 122 creating liability is an assessment order for all intents and purposes and can only be dealt under Cl. (a) of S. 129(1) and binds the Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 | Unexplained income or assets / Stock-in-trade |
Unexplained income or assets---Stock-in-trade--- Purchasing excess stock; an investment or expenditure---Scope---If any difference of declared stock is found or is effectively unearthed through audit or otherwise, it cannot be added as Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 14 | Stock-in-trade |
Stock-in-trade---Meaning-Stock-in-trade means anything produced, manufactured, purchased or otherwise acquired for manufacture, sale or exchange, and any material or supplies to be consumed in the production or manufacturing process, but does not include stocks and Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS KBS STEEL, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 111 & 35 | Interpretation |
Strict rule of interpretation-Scope-Strict rule of interpretation mandates that plain, clear and direct meaning is given to words Read More... |
2023 PTD 467 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS SUPER VICTORIA STORE, LAHORE VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE WHT, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 161, | Withholding/tax demand |
Dept., on taxpayer's failure to deduct withholding tax, created a certain tax demand---Appeal against such demand was dismissed---Officer Inland Revenue had failed to appreciate S. 161 of ITO 2001, in its true perspective-Since all the Read More... |
2023 PTD 179 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122, 122(1), 133, 177 | natural justice |
Principle of natural justice---Order in writing---Requirements---Order in writing must fulfill requirements of a speaking decision / order----Essential that party against whom such order is being passed must be given a proper notice confronting relevant material and Read More... |
2023 PTD 492 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122--WWFO, 1971 S.4---W.W.F. | no written order | principles of natural justice |
Written order absence of----Authorities raised demand of tax on the amount payable to Fund on the ground that no written order was passed under S.4 of Worker’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971----Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set Read More... |
2023 PTD 492 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, ISLAMABAD VS Messrs WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LIMITED, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 153 & 152 | Payments for goods, services and contracts |
Payments to non-residents----Payments for goods, services and contracts---Scope----Taxpayer was imposed upon a liability for its failure to deduct tax at the time of making payment under Ss. 152 & 153 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2023 PTD 499 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(5A) & (9) Constitution, Art.199 | Notice under Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment----Pre-Conditions----Petitioner / assessee was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by authorities to amend its assessment---Authorities objected to maintainability of petition against show cause Read More... |
2023 PTD 505 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS PRESSON DESCON INTERNATIONAL VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 124, 221 & 226 | rectification application/ Appeal Effect Order |
Appeal Effect Order, non-issuing of----Plea of rectification----Petitioner / taxpayer was aggrieved of non-issuance of Appeal Effect Order by authorities on the plea of pending rectification application----Inactions in discharge of Read More... |
2023 PTD 516 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE
VS MESSRS DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 113 & 133(1) | Final Tax Return/ Turnover |
Final Tax Return. Turnover dispute was with regard final discharge of liability over turnover. Turnover excluded tax paid or payable as final discharge of tax liability. Explanation added through Finance Act, 2012 replicated exclusion of deemed income assessed as Read More... |
2022 PTD 1019 2022 PTCL 852 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Filing of revised return |
Reference revised return, filing of amendment of assessment. Dispute was with regard to filing of revised return which was rejected by authorities. When revised return was furnished it was in conformity with S. 114 (6A)of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI AND OTHERS VS FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, F.I.A., HEADQUARTER, PESHAWAR MORR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 227 | Suit or criminal prosecution against taxpayers was barred unless a prior approval is granted by FBR |
Quashing of proceedings. Prior approval of FBR. Petitioners were serving in FBR and Income Tax department. Federal investigating Agency initiated investigation against petitioners for committing criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and misconduct. Contention Read More... |
2022 PTD 1040 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS ASIAN FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE AND OTHERS VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 120, 122, 174(3), 177 | Charging further tax/ change of opinion |
Constitutional petition Change of opinion. Scope Dispute was with regard to concept of “change of opinion” as show cause notice issued under S. 65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (since repealed) was not applicable for a show-cause notice under S. 122 of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1069 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(4), 122(4)(a), 122(4)(b), 122(5A) | Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation |
Assessment order Amendment Period of limitation Word “or” used after S. 122 (4) (a) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Scope Two conditions, as provided in clauses (a) & (b) of S. 122(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, where Commissioner wants to further Read More... |
2022 PTD 1082 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122 | Notice/ barred by time/ Amendment of assessment order |
Amendment of assessment order. Limitation Petitioner taxpayer was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by authorities to furnish reply warranting further amendment under S. 122 (5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Plea raised by petitioner/ taxpayer was that matter Read More... |
2022 PTD 1082 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 54, 124 & 134A | Alternate dispute resolution |
Alternate dispute resolution. Recovery notice plea raised by Petitioner Company was that all orders passed by various forums had to be taken into account before initiating recovery proceedings. The liability to pay tax was relatable to assessment order or an order Read More... |
2022 PTD 1097 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) VS ASKARI BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 23 | Eligible depreciable asset/ Initial allowance, deduction |
Taxpayer can claim deduction of initial allowance for an eligible depreciable asset (such as a building) being put to use by the taxpayer for the first time in a tax year, irrespective of the fact that the said building had been in use in the past in the hands of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1109 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 114, 120, 122, 153(1)(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Sections: 12(2), O.XLVII | Ignorance of law and fact |
Ignorance of law and fact. Authorities sought review of judgment passed by High Court on the basis of conceding statement made in favour of taxpayer. The power to review in available in Constitutional jurisdiction, as provisions, of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, are Read More... |
2022 PTD 1123 (2022)126 TAX 548 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 20, 120, 122(5A), 133 | S. 23 | Repealed enactments construction. |
Repealed enactments Construction and references to Pricing for retail consumers for natural gas. Question was with regard to development surcharge as expense while computing income from business and expenditure under S. 20 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The Proviso Read More... |
2022 PTD 1135 (2022)126 TAX 73 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE
VS Syed BHAIS LIGHTING LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 133 (1) & 161 | S. 156 | Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute |
Notice, issuance of Limitation Dispute was with regard to applying provision of S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, [since repealed]. Notice under S. 156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, could not be issued within five years or beyond the period for which taxpayer Read More... |
2022 PTD 1161 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS HNR COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120, 121(1)(d) & 122(2) | Best judgment assessment order |
Best judgment assessment order under section 121(1)(d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (“the Ordinance’) Such order cannot be made in cases where deemed assessment order has already been made under Section 120 of the Ordinance and, therefore, section Read More... |
2022 PTD 1169 (2022)125 TAX 354 2022 PTCL 463 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2022 |
UMER AYAZ KHAN VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 12, 149, & 153 | Payment for goods, services and contracts |
Salary Payment for goods, services and contracts. Scope Complainant was a temporary lecturer at a government college. College deducted income tax at the rate of 20% from salary of the complainant. Contention of complainant was that his salary was below the taxable Read More... |
2022 PTD 1187 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SANOFI-AVENTIS PAKISTAN LIMITED & OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 Ss. 80 & 148 - Drugs (Import & Export) Rules, 1976, Rule: 13 | Import of drugs for personal use |
Person Import of drugs for personal use. Scope Petitioners imported finished pharmaceutical products, which at the relevant time required certification from Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) for claiming a reduced rate of deduction of Income tax under S. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1205 (2021)124 TAX 148 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA VS M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1) (b), 122(5A) & 133 | Limitation/ Amendment of assessment |
Limitation dispute between parties was with regard to amended assessment order filed under S. 122 (5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Respondent/taxpayer filed income tax return for year 2006 on 30-12-2006, which deemed to be an assessment in term of S. 120(1)(b) of Read More... |
2022 PTD 1290 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Definite information/ Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation |
Amendment of assessments Audit Definite information. Non-consideration of taxpayer’s explanation. Effect Appellant/taxpayer assailed orders passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR) (Appeal) and assessing officer. The Assessing officer by considering the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1319 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
SAMINA YASMIN, PROP; FAISAL ELECTRONICS, WAZIRABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 177 | Audit Scope |
Commissioner after completion of audit shall issue audit observations and findings and then after issuing audit report he may amend the assessment order after providing opportunity of hearing to the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1319 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
VS REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C | Collective Bargaining Agent/ Educational institution |
Collective Bargaining Agent. Educational institution ‘Commercial basis’ meaning of Scope. Petitioner/Establishment was aggrieved of registration of private respondent as a Collective Bargaining Agent by the Registrar of Trade Unions. Petitioner was a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1384 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH SECRETARY
VS REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS LAHORE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 100C | Tax credit for charitable organizations |
Tax credit for charitable organizations. Scope one of the persons to whom the provision of S. 100C, applies is a trust Subsection (2) of S. 100C, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides the category of income which is eligible for tax credit and includes income from Read More... |
2022 PTD 1384 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Income Tax Rules, 2001 Ss. 21(c), 2(54), 67, 120, 122(5A), 133, 153(1)(b) | R. 13 | Royalty/ Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty |
Withholding tax, collection of Principal Royalty. Amended assessment order. Respondent taxpayer was manufacturer of soft drinks selling its product exclusively by chain of restaurants through their outlets. Dispute was with regard to collection of tax on amount paid Read More... |
2022 PTD 1400 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE
VS COCA COLA PAKISTAN LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 | Exercise of Jurisdiction/ Question of law |
Reference High Court, exercise of jurisdiction. Question of law. Scope reference under S. 133 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, lies before High Court on question of law of law only and the Court is obliged to answer the same in accordance with a rule of law. Question Read More... |
2022 PTD 1400 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1), 231A | Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment |
Amendment of assessment. Preconditions Amendment of assessment under S. 122(5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 can be made only in cases where twin conditions namely, (i) Assessment order is erroneous; and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue, are Read More... |
2022 PTD 1411 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE
VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL RIND & SONS D.G. KHAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 120(1), 122(5A)(9), 133(1) & 231 | Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal |
Reference Amendment of assessment. Calculation of cash withdrawal and tax deduction. Erroneous and prejudicial order. Proof Authorities amended assessment order of respondent taxpayer on the plea that it was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1411 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS CELLANDGENE PHARMACEUTICAL INTERNATIONAL THROUGH PARTNER
VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177 | Selection for audit/ vested constitutional rights |
Petitioner assailed its selection for audit vide impugned notice on the premise that the selection did not fulfill the criteria of S. 177 (7) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Contention of Petitioner was that there were no reasonable grounds to call for the audit Read More... |
2022 PTD 1464 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS DAWOOD ISLAMIC BANK LIMITED (NOW BURJ BANK) |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 108 & 109 | Transactions between associates/ Recharacterisation of income and deductions |
Transactions between associates Recharacterisation of income and deductions. Scope Question before High Court was whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified to delete the addition made by Assessing Officer on account of interest on the advances/disbursement to a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1474 (2021)124 TAX 329 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I VS MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 | Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles |
Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles. Entry made in accounts, as per accounting system employed by a person regularly maintained by him is considered to be valid allowable, if it is not contrary to other provisions of law. In Read More... |
2022 PTD 1535 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I
VS MESSRS EXCELL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 20, 32, 34, 122, 133 | Method of accounting and accrual –basis accounting Principles |
Method of accounting and accrual-basis accounting. Principles. Entry made in accounts. Assessing Authority did not accept claim of loss suffered by taxpayer due to currency exchange rate and added the loss into total income of taxpayer. Appellate Authority deleted Read More... |
2022 PTD 1535 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR MICRO FINANCE BANK LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 53, 133, 150, 151, 159, 159(1), 159(2), 161, 233, Second Sched. Part IV, Cl. 47B | Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate |
Withholding tax. Exemption Certificate. Recovery of tax. Dispute between parties was that in absence of Certificate of exemption under S.159 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, applicant/ Tax payer was liable to recovery of tax under S. 161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1619 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
ASHIQ ALI CHAUDHARY VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 161, 205 | Appeal filing electronically/ Art. 10-A of the Constitution |
Appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Prescribed form of appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) Scope Case of petitioner was that he was required to file an appeal under S. 127of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; that R. 76 of the Income Tax Rules, 2000, provided but remedy Read More... |
2022 PTD 1627 (2021)124 TAX 237 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133 | Suspension of judgment passed by High Court |
Suspension of judgment passed by High Court. Scope Applicant sought sixty days’ time to approach the Supreme Court and in the meanwhile Income Tax Department be restrained from recovery of the tax, the request was made on the basis of referred precedents. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1632 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS SINDH IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE AUTHORITY (SIDA) VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HYDERABAD ZONE, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 84 | Filing of separate income tax return |
Joint Venture Association of Persons (AOP). Filing of separate income tax return. Non-Resident status, determination of Dispute was with regard to treating Joint Venture Association of Persons as Non-Resident by imposing tax at the rate of 15% instead of 5%. Held, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1679 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 4(1) (s) & 140 | Tax recovery. Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances. |
Coercive measures. Mechanism Redressal of grievances. FBR is endowed with duty to facilitate taxpayers and establish mechanism to address their grievances and complaints. Under fiscal laws, including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, officials are conferred vast Read More... |
2022 PTD 1690 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
SUNGI DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEES
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122(5A), 140 & 170 | Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer |
Constitutional petition. Refunds Coercive measures Authorities recovered amount of tax from Bank account of petitioner/ taxpayer. Grievance of petitioner / taxpayer was that amount recovered from bank account was not due and it was illegal and unlawful. The Read More... |
2022 PTD 1690 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
M/s Zia Steel Re-Rolling Mills, 1-10, Islamabad. VS Commissioner Inland Revenue, Enf-IX, LTU, Islamabad. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 182(1), SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 & SRO No. 494(I)/2013 dated 10-06-2013 | Late filing of income tax returns |
Failure to furnish return of income. Scope Appellant was imposed upon penalties for late filing of income tax returns for the tax years 2011 and 2012. The Federal Government through SRO No. 550(I)/2012 dated 23-05-2012 had allowed the steel melters to deposit the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1722 (2021)123 TAX 239 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131 & 133 | Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court/ Supreme Court |
Questions of law not raised before the Tribunal or High Court. Supreme Court is not a forum to raise fresh questions of law which have not been examined by the Tribunal or the High Court or do not even arise from the decision of the Tribunal. In numerous cases, a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1727 |
|
Supreme Court Of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 21(e) | Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed |
Income from business, computation of Deductions not allowed. Contributions made by tax-payer Company to an unproved gratuity fund. Section 21(e) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 clearly stipulates that the contributions to an unapproved gratuity fund cannot be Read More... |
2022 PTD 1727 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Ss. 172, 127 & 227 | S. 9 | Courts to try all civil suits unless barred |
Representatives Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) Bar of suits in Civil Courts. Scope Plaintiff challenged a show-cause notice issued under S. 172(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through a civil suit. The Order passed under S. 172(3)(f) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2022 PTD 1742 (2022)126 TAX 107 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-IV, KARACHI
VS MUHAMMAD HAMID |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 65, 62 & 136 | Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment |
Additional assessment/ reopening of previously completed assessment on basis of “Definite Information” Nature and meaning of term “definite information”. Scope. Question before High Court was whether assessment of taxpayer could be reopened Read More... |
2022 PTD 1752 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS CHINA NATIONAL ELECTRIC WIRE AND CABLE IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 127, 128, 129, 129(4), 131, 131(1), 122 | Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order |
Rectification of mistakes. Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Decision in appeal. Oral order, legality of Scope. Appellate Tribunal while invoking its jurisdiction under S. 221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on its own observed that in an earlier order it had Read More... |
2022 PTD 1839 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS PEARL SECURITY (PVT.) LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 133, 170, 170(4), 170(5)(b) | Limitation / Inaction of authorities Effect |
Question was with regard to limitation of tax refund. Taxpayer was estopped from asserting a favorable refund order by default where it had statutory recourse against inaction of authorities, which it opted not to pursue. Taxpayer not filing an appeal under S. Read More... |
2022 PTD 1876 |
|
Baluchistan High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, QUETTA
VS MESSRS BALOCHISTAN ONYX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 133 | Audit, selection for Definite information. Pre- condition |
Audit, selection for definite information. Pre- condition. Case of respondent/taxpayer was selected for audit by Commissioner Inland Revenue. The Adjudicating authority i.e. Commissioner Inland Revenue in violation to legal provision as it stood then on 07/07/2009 Read More... |
2022 PTD 1889 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report |
Amendment of assessment. Audit ‘Definite information’. Failure to obtain taxpayer’s explanation on issued raised in the audit report. Effect department assailed officer amending the deemed assessment was set aside. Amended assessment was framed on Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Audit report/audit observation/ objections/ charge sheet |
Amendment of assessment. Audit. Procedure Scope ‘Definite information’ Assessing Officer, after formulation of the audit report/audit observation/objections/charge sheet, ought to first confront the same to the taxpayer and secondly, after considering Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Audit/ Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment. Scope Section 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, does not in itself provide any power or absolute empowerment to modify assessment or re-determine the income of taxpayer. Key point to be kept in mind is that it is not a return of income Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 177 | Conducting of audit proceeding is just a process |
Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure. Scope selection for audit or even conducting and audit does not mean modification of assessment. Selection for audit and thereafter conducting of audit proceeding is just a process. Assessing officer, before invoking the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 | Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment |
Expression ‘subject to this section’ Scope. Provisions of S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, start with the language “subject to this section”. Such language restricts all further proceedings for amendment of an assessment which means it Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. A.O. CLINIC, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 177 & 122 | Definite information |
Audit Amendment of assessment. Procedure Scope. ‘Definite information’ Scope. Deemed assessment, if selected for audit, may be amended by invoking jurisdiction under S. 122(1), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, subject to fulfillment of conditions as envisaged Read More... |
2022 PTD 1895 (2019)120 TAX 125 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS NEW DADU SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 131, 132 | Limitation Successive appeals |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Limitation Successive appeals on the same cause of action. Scope. Appellant filed application for grant of stay along with supporting appeal for the third time against the same order of refusal to stay the recovery of tax demand by the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1927 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
VS The CIR, RTO, Peshawar. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153, 153(1)(b), 161, 177, Second Schedule-Part (IV)-Clause 46AA | Payments for goods, services and contracts |
SRO 586(1)/91 dated: 30-06-1991---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Payments for goods, services and contracts---Exemptions and tax concessions-Scope---Department raised demand and imposed liabilities upon the appellant for its Read More... |
2023 PTD 911 2022 PTCL 899 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE VS SHAZIA ZAFAR |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 111, 122 & 133 | Unexplained income or assets/ Separate notice |
Unexplained income or assets Separate notice, issuance of Words “the person offers no explanation” and “or the explanation offered by the person is not, in the Commissioner’s opinion, satisfactory” Scope Dispute was with regard to Read More... |
2022 PTD 1942 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/s. Peshawar Electric Supply Company, Limited, (PESCO), Peshawar.
VS The CIR, RTO, Peshawar. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Qanun-e-Shahadat 1984 Art. 129(e) | Administration of justice |
Thing required by law to be done in a certain manner must be done in the same manner as prescribed by law or not at all. |
2023 PTD 911 2022 PTCL 899 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(3), 162, 174, 174(3) | Maintenance of Record |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----Ss.174(3), 161 , 162---Records, information collection and audit---Maintenance of record by taxpayer---Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record----Maintenance of record after lapse of statutorily Read More... |
2022 PTD 51 (2022)125 TAX 55 2023 PTCL 60 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA VS THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 13 | Double jeopardy / Protection against double punishment |
Protection against double punishment and self-incrimination. Scope issuance of a notice regarding the same taxed amounts tantamount to double jeopardy which cannot be given legal credence but also offends and defies the fundamental rights set out in Art. 13 of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 187 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD VS ABDUL HAMEED, LABOUR CONTRACTOR |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss: 53(1)(b), 153, 153(1)(c), 153(9) | Services, meaning/ Rendering of labour and carriage services |
"Services", meaning of Scope. Rendering of labour and carriage services. Whether income from labour and carriage services is liable to fixed tax regime. Held, that definition of ‘services’ in subsection (9) of section 153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2022 PTD 1673 (2022)126 TAX 438 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Delay was negligible |
Dismissal of revision petition being barred by 16 days/Validity/Such delay was negligible/Commissioner instead of knocking out the petitioner on technicalities, ought to have considered his prayer on merits/Order of Commissioner refusing Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS TOYOTA WALTON MOTORS and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(6), 114(6A), 122(5A), 122(9), 133(1) | Judiciary |
Judiciary is respected not on account of its power to legalize injustice on technical grounds, but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do Read More... |
2022 PTD 1035 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Judgment |
Judgment is an authority only in respect to what it decides, and only with regard to the proposition of law raised, in that case, and therefore point not argued before the Court cannot be considered to have been dealt with by its Read More... |
2022 PTD 683 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-1), RTO, RAWALPINDI VS TARIQ MAHMOOD. PROPRIETOR STANDARD MEDICAL STORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 122(5A), 133(1) & Second Schedule, Part-III, clause 8 | Fast Moving consumer goods |
Tax rebate, the entitlement of Authorities were aggrieved of the order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue against tax rebate allowed to taxpayer who Read More... |
2022 PTD 1 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
SIKANDAR HAYAT AND 16 OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, Second Schedule, Part-I, Clause 146, Part-IV, Clause 110 | Tribal Area/exemption from payment of income tax |
Tax Relief Petitioners were civil servants who claimed tax relief in their salaries on the plea that they were also residents of erstwhile Provisionally Read More... |
2022 PTD 11 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
RAZA MOTOR INDUSTRIES VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.177 [as substituted through Finance Act, 2010] | Selection of Audit/ Call documents |
Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of notices of selection of their case for audit. Plea raised by petitioners/taxpayers was that Read More... |
2022 PTD 19 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 161, 161(3), 162, 174, 174(3) | Burden on Department to justify delayed proceedings |
Records, information collection and audit---Maintenance of record by taxpayer---Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record. Maintenance Read More... |
2022 PTD 51 (2022)125 TAX 55 2023 PTCL 60 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT (LTU), LAHORE VS MESSRS PEPSI COLA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 24(11), 122, 120(1)(b), 122(2), 122(5A) | Reassessment made/ beyond time limitation |
Reassessment principle limitation taxpayer was aggrieved of reassessment made by Assessing Officer beyond time limitation. It was Read More... |
2022 PTD 97 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
Dr. ZAFAR SAJJAD through authorized attorney VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 2(20), 12, 18(b), 120, 122(9), 133 & Sched. II, Part-III cl. 1(2) proviso [as inserted by Finance Act, 2019] | Amendment effects/changes in law/ clinical supplements and incentives |
Taxpayer, a permanent employee of a Hospital Salary - Clinical supplements and incentives. Show-Cause notice, issuance of Taxpayers (assessees) were aggrieved of show-cause notice issued to them to include clinical supplements and incentives received by them from Read More... |
2022 PTD 109 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA VS THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 18, 20, 111, 111(1)(d), 111(1)(d)(i), 120(A), 122(1), 122(5)(ii), 129(1) | Unexplained income or assets/ Production and sales are the particulars of income but not income by itself |
Appellant assailed order passed by department as well as Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the amount of gross sales was held to be its income and was taxed accordingly. Appellant had rightly availed Amnesty Scheme under the Voluntary Declaration of Domestic Read More... |
2022 PTD 187 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ETC. VS JAHANGIR KHAN TAREEN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(1), 122(4), 122(5), 122(5A), 122(9), 209 & 209(2) | Show cause notice Scope and purpose |
Show cause notice was delivered to a person by an authority in order to get the reply back with a reasonable cause as to why a particular action should not be taken against him with regard to the defaulting act. By and large, it was a well-defined and Read More... |
2022 PTD 232 (2021)124 TAX 552 2022 PTCL 1 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS VS MUHAMMAD TAHIR AND BROTHERS OGHI MANSEHRA AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, 133, Second Schedule | Merger of Tribal Areas/ all laws including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 became applicable |
Tribal Areas Merger of Tribal Areas into settled areas Automatic applicability of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to areas that cease to be Tribal Areas by operation of Art. 247(6) of the Constitution. Question before High Court was whether after cessation of a District Read More... |
2022 PTD 283 (2022)126 TAX 370 2022 PTCL 513 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
OBS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH MANAGER LEGAL
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 170, 170(2), 221 | Retrospective effect of Circular |
FBR Circular No. 4 of 2000, dated 17-2-2000 (FBR Circular) Workers Welfare Fund. Adjustment, availing of Retrospective effect of Circular Scope. Petitioners/ companies were required to contribute towards their workers’ welfare as Workers’ Welfare Fund. Read More... |
2022 PTD 290 2023 PTCL 466 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS MESSRS MONNOOWAL TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 67, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9), 133, 154(4), 169(1) | Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return |
Apportionment of expenditure Amendment in tax return. Dispute was with regard to apportionment of expenditure incurred and adjustments claimed by taxpayer under R. 231 of Income Tax Rules, 2002. Plea raised by authorities was that apportionment of expenditures was Read More... |
2022 PTD 305 (2022)125 TAX 65 2022 PTCL 430 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
HONG KONG SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ss. 61, 62, 135 & 136 | Loan to employee/ expenditure |
Loan to employee’s Factual controversy. Appellant/taxpayer was a Banking Company and dispute was with regard to amounts advanced to its employees as loan. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ignored examination of factual aspect that whether any expenditure was Read More... |
2022 PTD 310 2022 PTCL 437 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 | Rectification of mistake. Pendency of Reference before High Court against the same order |
Appellant sought rectification of order passed by the Tribunal. Appellant had also filed an Income Tax Reference Application against the same order of the Tribunal before the High Court. Appellant could not have the best of both worlds, as seeking relief Read More... |
2022 PTD 325 (2021)123 TAX 300 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. KARACHI PORT TRUST KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 221 | Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction |
Rectification of mistake. Review jurisdiction Scope Resolution of once decided issue tantamount to “review”, which is not allowed to the Tribunal and falls under the domain of Superior Courts. Rectification of mistake Scope of rectification is Read More... |
2022 PTD 325 (2021)123 TAX 300 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
MESSRS EMIRATES SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 & 132 | Interim relief to taxpayer granted by Appellate Tribunal |
Adjudication by Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Petitioner taxpayer impugned order of Appellate Tribunal whereby interim relief already granted to taxpayer and extended subsequently five times by Appellate Tribunal was later declined during pendency of main appeal, Read More... |
2022 PTD 404 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2022 |
PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5), 122(5A), 122(5AA) & 122(4) | Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment |
Amendment of assessments---Power of Commissioner to further amend / alter assessment in terms of Ss.122 (5A) & 122(5AA) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Time Barred amendment in assessments not sustainable---Scope---Petitioner/Taxpayer impugned notice for further Read More... |
2022 PTD 413 (2022)126 TAX 218 2022 PTCL 503 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
MANZOOR AHMAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE II, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(m,), 111, 111(1)(b), 120, 122, 122(5A), 122(9), 127, 131, 231A | Amendment of assessments---Failure to confront specific provision |
Failure to confront specific provision in notice---Scope---Taxpayer assailed order passed by assessing officer whereby he had amended the demand assessment order and the dismissal of his appeal---Show cause notice issued to the taxpayer did not reflect the addition Read More... |
2022 PTD 420 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ALPHA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL ZONE-A, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 65 & 136 | Additional assessment---Exercise of authority under S.65 |
Exercise of authority under S.65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for additional assessment of taxpayer---Inadmissible expenditures---Scope---Question before High Court was whether income tax assessment of taxpayer, which was an insurance company, could be reopened Read More... |
2022 PTD 439 2022 PTCL 534 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 | Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer/ Income from other sources |
Dividend in specie received by the taxpayer is income and taxable under S. 5 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--Dividends constitute a separate block of income that is brought to tax in terms of S. 5 of the 2001 Ordinance---Dividends are to be taxed as a separate Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 2(19)(a), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 8, 39, 150 | Each tax year is a separate unit of account/ Exemption clause |
Each tax year is a separate unit of account and taxation and the law has to be applied as it stood in respect of that tax year alone. Tax statute---Exemption clause---Retrospective effect---Scope---Exemption clause has a beneficial effect does not mean that it Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
FAWAD AHMAD MUKHTAR VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 5 & 150 | Dividends, tax on |
Distinction---Section 5 speaks of the dividend being “received” by a person from a company, while S. 150 speaks of the dividend being “paid” by the latter---Former is a general expression , bringing to tax all that is received by way of Read More... |
2022 PTD 454 (2022)125 TAX 481 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI VS BROOK BOND PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 50(4A), 52 & 86 | Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default |
Commission/trade discount---Assessee in default---Determination---Sale agreement---Scope---Respondent-assessee claimed that disputed amount was not commission rather it was trade discount, therefore no tax was deducted---Assessing Officer made assessment under Read More... |
2022 PTD 467 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 | Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss. 161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to deduct or deposit withholding Read More... |
2022 PTD 547 (2023)127 TAX 166 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
TOURSISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF PUNJAB, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, CRTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 161 & 205 | S. 50 & 156 | Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Rectification of mistake---Default surcharge, determination of---Scope---Assessing officer worked out tax liability under Ss.161 & 205 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for its failure to Read More... |
2022 PTD 547 (2023)127 TAX 166 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ALLIED ENGINEERING AND SERVICES LTD. THROUGH ATTORNEY VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 67, 169, 18, 20 & 11 | Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business |
Deductions in computing income chargeable under head “Income from Business”---Composite business activities---Expenses common to income under Normal Business Income and Presumptive Tax Regime---Apportionment of deductions---Scope---Question before High Read More... |
2022 PTD 558 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 | Minimum tax on the income of certain persons |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Appellant/taxpayer adjusted tax under Cl. (c) of subsection (2) of S.113 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, For two years---Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue (DCIR) adjusted such carried forward excess amount from Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113 | Minimum tax on the income of certain persons |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Scope---Clause (a) of subsection (2) of S.113, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, provides that the aggregate of the person’s turnover as defined in subsection (3) for the tax year shall be treated as the income of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S. INDUS PENCIL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LIMITED, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE- I, LTU-II, KARACHI |
INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 (XLIX OF 2001) 113, 122, 122(1) & 122(5A) | Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law |
Scope---Courts are merely supposed to interpret the law as it is and have no authority to add, delete or subtract any word in or from the language used by the legislature and in a taxing statute, a tax on any person is to be levied by clear and unambiguous words and Read More... |
2022 PTD 599 (2020)122 TAX 102 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-III), LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT VS M/S NEW JUBILEE INSURANCE CO. LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 26(a), 99, 122 (5A) & 133 | Term ‘subject to adjustment’/ Amendment of assessment |
Term ‘subject to adjustment’---Amendment of assessment---Scope---Authorities withdrew the advantages given to taxpayer company on account of its associated company and revised the assessment order by making an addition to its tax assessment---Appellate Read More... |
2022 PTD 618 2022 PTCL 624 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 176 | S. 3 | Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts |
Notice to obtain information or evidence---Offence of money laundering---Scope---Petitioners through constitutional petitions attempted to set the process at naught from initiating the proceedings as under took by the Income Tax department in terms of Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 | Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010 S. 111 | S. 3 | Offence of money laundering/ un-accounted amounts |
Unexplained income or assets---Offense of money laundering---Scope---Non-declaration of an asset by assessee under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is not a scheduled offence, unless proved otherwise as required under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
GOVIND RAM VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Anti-Money Laundering Act (VII of 2010) Ss. 3 & 5 | Offence of money laundering/ property is proceeds of crime |
National Executive Committee to combat money laundering---Scope---Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, a person is presumed to be guilty of offence of money laundering if he acquires, converts, possesses, uses or transfers property knowing or having reason to Read More... |
2022 PTD 634 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SALEEM BUTT VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177(1) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54. | Audit Notice / Mala fide, proof of |
Suit for declaration and injunction. Mala fide, proof of- Show-cause notice Plaintiff/ taxpayer assailed show-cause notice to conduct audit on the plea of mala fide and discrimination. Held. Mere allegation of mala fides was not enough to dislodge presumption of Read More... |
2022 PTD 716 2022 PTCL 793 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 11(2) | Show cause notice Tax not paid |
Show cause notice Tax not paid Petitioner was income tax assessee, who called in question show-cause notices for tax period November 2013 to March 2018 and July 2013 to October 2013 respectively issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue. Plea raised by petitioner Read More... |
2022 PTD 729 (2022)126 TAX 600 2022 PTCL 776 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
ROMEX INTERNATIONAL VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 127(2), 128(1AA) | Applicability Interim relief |
Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravabit’ Applicability Interim relief, extension in delay in disposal of appeal. Petitioners were tax payers who sought extension in interim relief. ----Maxim: ‘actus curiae neminem gravait’ could be involed only Read More... |
2022 PTD 760 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, LAHORE VS MESSRS MECO (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 S. 64 | Limitation for assessment |
Limitation for assessment Scope. Question before High Court was whether time imitation for an assessment also included the time consumed in service of order, whereas S. 64 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, determined the time limitation for an assessment only. Read More... |
2022 PTD 809 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 S. 177, 177(1), 213, 214, 214C | Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner |
Audit Selection of case. Commissioner and FBR , jurisdictions of Commissioner under S. 177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, is required to apply his mind and provide reasons for selection, Whereas FBRunder S. 214C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, may select a person Read More... |
2022 PTD 866 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
ATLAS HONDA LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRTARY REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2011 Ss.177, 213, 214 & 214C Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Audit Selection of case/ jurisdictions of Commissioner |
Constitutional petition Audit, selection of case. Jurisdiction of commissioner. Judicial review. Directions of FBR Scope. Petitioners/ taxpayers were aggrieved of issuance of notices by Commissioner selecting there cases for audit on the basis of directions from Read More... |
2022 PTD 866 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, LAHORE VS M/S PANTHER SPORTS & RUBBER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD, ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 161(1A), 165(2B) & 174(3) Income Tax Rules, 2002 Rr. 29(4) & 44(4). | Records to be maintained for a period of six years |
Books of account, documents and records to be maintained for a period of six years. Scope of section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Taxpayer is obliged to maintain the record under section 174(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for a period of six years Read More... |
2022 PTD 888 (2022)126 TAX 9 2022 PTCL 544 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-VII, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-II, LAHORE
VS MESSRS TECHLOGIX PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 113(3)(b), 133(1), 153(1)(b), 153(6) & first proviso | Payments for goods and services/ Insertion of third proviso |
Maximum tax Scope Dispute was with regard to applicability of proviso added to S. 153(6) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside orders passed by two forums below. --- Turnover, in terms of reenacted S. 113(3)(b) of Income Tax Read More... |
2022 PTD 893 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
SAKRAND SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 111 & 182 | Assessment and penalty proceedings. |
Assessment and penalty proceedings. Penalty, imposing of Particulars of income. Determination. Read More... |
2022 PTD 901 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE VS NEWAGE CABLES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 122 & 153(7)(iv) | Amendment of assessment/ Failure to issue of show cause notice |
Customs General Order No. 11/2007, dated 28-08-2007. Amendment of assessment “Manufacturer” Meanings -- Failure to issue of show cause notice. Scope. Question before High Court was whether business of respondent regarding slitting/cutting of copper Read More... |
2022 PTD 910 (2022)125 TAX 388 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS MESSRS GRAYS LEASING LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 133(1), 133(5), 161 | Lease rental income |
Lease rental income. Scope Dispute was with regard to assessment of lease rental income under S. 12(19) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on actual receipt basis and not on accrual basis. The Assessee could not claim depreciation, initial and normal and simultaneously Read More... |
2022 PTD 951 2022 PTCL 811 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS ASIF KAMAL |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 177, 177(6) | Appeal dismissed/ appellant dept. was absent |
Preamble Revenue cases Lack of assistance provided by the counsel and officials of the FBR and its Inland Revenue department. During the hearing before the Supreme Court, the copies of the show cause notice sent to the taxpayer, the audit report, the response Read More... |
2022 PTD 965 (2022)125 TAX 351 2022 PTCL 480 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD
VS MESSRS NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 114, 115(4), 120, 122, 122C, 122(1), 122(5A), 133(1), 169(2) | Altering/amending assessment order |
Altering/amending assessment order. Commissioner income tax. Jurisdiction. Assessment order based on statement of income furnished under S. 115(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could be altered/ amended by Commissioner under S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Read More... |
2022 PTD 978 (2022)126 TAX 43 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
QASIM SHAH MARBLE FACTORY UMARY, DISTRICT BAJUR THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Preamble Constitution Article: 199 | Exemption from income tax |
Preamble Notifications SRO No. 1212(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 & SRO No. 1213(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 19. Factual controversy Exemption from income tax Petitioners were industrialists who sought exemption from income tax charged in Read More... |
2022 PTD 981 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 122 | Amendment of assessment/ Alternate remedy, availability of |
Amendment of assessment---Alternate remedy, availability of---Scope---Petitioner assailed notice issue by department under S.122(9) read with S.122(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 whereby certain documents were sought from the petitioner---Validity---No adverse Read More... |
2021 PTD 1321 | (2022) 125 TAX 170 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 120, 121 & 122 | Best judgment assessment |
Assessment---“Best judgment assessment”---Assessment of assessment---Scope---Assessment is made under Part II of Chapter X of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which deals with the assessment under S.120 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 while the scheme of Read More... |
2021 PTD 1321 | (2022) 125 TAX 170 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
RAMZAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 4 | Right of individuals |
Right of individuals to be dealt in accordance with law---Scope---Under Art.4 of the Constitution, it is an inalienable right of every citizen of Pakistan to be treated in accordance with law and no action detrimental to his/her life, liberty, reputation or property Read More... |
2021 PTD 1321 | (2022) 125 TAX 170 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122 SRO No.57(I)/ 2012, dated 24-01-2012 | Amendment of assessment/ Exemption notification-Retrospective operation |
Taxpayer, being rice mill, had a special tax year starting from 1st of September till 31st of August----Minimum tax was being paid on normal rates till issuance of SRO No.57(I )/2012, dated: 24-01-2012 and on its issuance the tax for the year 2012 was paid at Read More... |
2021 PTD 1 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY |
Interpretation of statutes | Remedial and curative legislation |
Purpose of remedial and curative legislation is to abridge superfluities, remove defects or mischief from an existing law to redress wrongs and injuries being impinged upon the existing rights---Such legislation can be applied retrospectively, if intention of the Read More... |
2021 PTD 1 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE.
VS M/S THREE STAR RICE FACTORY |
Interpretation of documents | Remedial and curative legislation |
General rule is that a notification cannot operate retrospective but in case it removes defects, superfluities or mischiefs from an existing notification to advance remedy for enforcement of existing rights, it can be applied retrospectively by the issuing authority Read More... |
2021 PTD 1 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed] Second Sched. Pt. I, CI. 126F [since omitted]--- | Payment of commission by franchisor to the franchisee/exemption from payment Income |
Franchisee of mobile company (franchisor) carrying out business in District Nowshera---Payment of commission by franchisor to the franchisee--- Exemption from deduction of advance tax on payment of commission for a period of three years Read More... |
2021 PTD 11 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS M.I. TRADERS, LAHORE VS THE PRINCIPAL APPRAISER, GROUP-I, MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-EAST, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Customs Act 1969 S. 2(a), 80, 83, 186, 193-A& 202 Customs Rules, 2001, Rr.438 &442 | Order passed by Appellate authority was barred by 70 days |
Despite payment of all duties and taxes levied by authorities, goods in question were not released by Customs Authorities---Validity---Authorities were only authorized to take action for issuance of detention notice in terms of S.202 of Read More... |
2021 PTD 19 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS M.I. TRADERS, LAHORE VS THE PRINCIPAL APPRAISER, GROUP-I, MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-EAST, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(a), 80, 80(3), 83, 186, 193-A, 202 | Speaking order |
Every judicial and quasi-judicial finding should be based on reasons containing justification for the finding in the order Read More... |
2021 PTD 19 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS HUSSAIN MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.182 165 | penalties for its failure to furnish monthly statements |
Appellant was imposed upon penalties for its failure to furnish monthly statements in term |
2021 PTD 35 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
NEW CHERAT COAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.8(1)(b) SRO No.549(1)/2006 dated 05.06.2006 | Input tax adjustment |
Goods specified by Federal Government upon which registered person shall not be entitled to reclaim or deduct input tax paid---Nature of power conferred on Federal Government under S.8(1)(b) of Sales Tax Act, 1990-Scope- Petitioners/taxpayers impugned SRO Read More... |
2021 PTD 43 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS SEFAM (PVT.) LTD, LAHORE
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.127, 128 & 129 | proper opportunity of hearing/ audi alterm partem |
Appeal to commissioner--Opportunity of hearing-Maxim: audi alteram partem---Applicability--Scope---Nobody can be condemned unheard and no act or action which is detrimental, against the right and interest of a person can be passed without giving him prior notice and Read More... |
2021 PTD 47 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI VS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) | coram non judice |
No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More... |
2021 PTD 51 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI VS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228 | coram non judice |
No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More... |
2021 PTD 51 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2021 |
M/S ORIENT PAK INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE
VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, GROUP-VI, MCC, (APPRAISEMENT-EAST). KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.162 Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 11 Customs Act 1969 Ss.18, 18A, 18C, 32, 198 & 202 | Mis-declaration /Income tax and Sales tax, recovery |
Show-cause notice--- Jurisdiction--Valuation Ruling (VR)---Object, purpose and scope--- Importer was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Deputy Collector for recovery of taxes including sales tax and income tax, on the plea of Read More... |
2021 PTD 138 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
DR. SYED FARHAT ABBAS, ISLAMABAD
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.114 | Deduction of expenses |
Question before Appellate Tribunal was whether the appellant was entitled to get set off/deduction of any expenses from his professional services receipts---Appellant had rightly claimed expenses-Tax returns were lawfully filed under normal tax regime which had to Read More... |
2021 PTD 157 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
MST. FOUZIA RAZZAK VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.140 & 138 Constitution of Pakistan, Art.4 | attachment and recovery of tax amount from the Bank accounts |
Right of individuals to be dealt in accordance with law---Recovery of tax out of property and through arrest of taxpayer---Recovery of tax from persons holding money on behalf of a taxpayer--Scope-Petitioners assailed order of department regarding attaching their Read More... |
2021 PTD 162 2022 PTCL 391 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/s WAULAR ENGINEERING, ISLAMABAD
VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.221 | Rectification of mistake |
Applicant sought rectification of the order passed by Appellate Tribunal on the ground that the details of payments on account of local purchases were over- sighted during the course of hearing of main appeal--Once the appellant had submitted the details of local Read More... |
2021 PTD 166 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN ZONE VS FALAH UD DIN QURESHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S.111 | Unexplained income or assets/ Separate Notice |
Non issuance of separate notice under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and failure to confront the taxpayer with the proposed addition in order to require him to explain his position before making addition in his income is Read More... |
2021 PTD 192 (2021) 124 TAX 609 2021 PTCL 607 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
AZHAR SADIQ CH. ISLAMABAD
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.111(1), 122(1) & 214-C | Unexplained gross inflow/selection for audit |
Unexplained gross inflow-Proof-Taxpayer was aggrieved of selection of his case for audit as his declared income was not accepted by authorities-- Validity---Deposits in question were explained but on the other hand were not subtracted from the total amount Read More... |
2021 PTD 184 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION CUSTOMS, KARACHI VS THE SPECIAL JUDGE (CUSTOMS, TAXATION AND ANTI-SMUGGLING) KARACHI AND 20 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Literal rule and grammatical construction Applicability |
Literal rule and grammatical construction Applicability---Judge, according to literal rule, must rely on exact wording of statute while describing the law Judge can deviate from such rule only when grammatical construction of statute gives some absurd meaning and it Read More... |
2021 PTD 195 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 20 & 21 | Income from business/ Deductible expenses |
Income from business---Deductible expenses---Burden of proof-Scope---Right has been vested in the taxpayer to claim deductible expenses for the purposes of computing his income---Onus to dispute the said expense, so claimed by a Read More... |
2021 PTD 299 (2021) 123 TAX 292 2021 PTCL 647 2021 SCMR 27 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 20 & 21, 22 | Depreciable assets |
Depreciable assets Unsold improved land---Structural improvements---Deduction was allowed for depreciation of the taxpayer's depreciable assets used in furtherance of his business in the said tax year--Term "depreciable assets", as explained in subsection (15) of S. Read More... |
2021 PTD 299 (2021) 123 TAX 292 2021 PTCL 647 2021 SCMR 27 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 20, 21(n), 22(13)(b), 22(15) & Third Sched., Pt. I | Deductible expense |
Deductible expenses---Scope- Depreciable assets- Unsold improved land- Structural improvements--Cost of land beneath a building-Whether the cost of land beneath a "building" would be included in determining the value of the rate of depreciation specified in the Read More... |
2021 PTD 299 (2021) 123 TAX 292 2021 PTCL 647 2021 SCMR 27 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
MESSRS SHAHID GUL AND PARTNERS VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AUDIT-V, RTO, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 20(1), 21(n), 22(13)(b), 22(15) & Third Sched., Pt. I | Sale of constructed shops/ offices on purchased land-Deductible expenses |
Sale of constructed shops/offices on purchased land-Deductible expenses---Scope----Depreciable assets--Unsold improved land-Structural improvements----[Per Yahya Afridi, J (Majority view): While Read More... |
2021 PTD 299 (2021) 123 TAX 292 2021 PTCL 647 2021 SCMR 27 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
AAMEER MUSTAALY KARACHIWALLA. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE & 3 OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 182 & 116A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Show Cause Notice under S.182 |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Show---cause notice under S.182 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for imposition of penalty for not furnishing return of Foreign Assets and Liabilities under S.116A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Maintainability of Read More... |
2021 PTD 335 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
AAMEER MUSTAALY KARACHIWALLA. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 182, 116A, 2(44) & 116. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199, Constitutional petition | Wealth statement/ Foreign income and assets statement |
Wealth statement--Foreign income and assets statement---Penalty for failure to furnish foreign income and assets statement under S.116A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Absence of prescribed format, effect of-Scope--Petitioners / taxpayers impugned show-cause notice Read More... |
2021 PTD 335 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2021 |
M/S M. SHAH MUHAMMAD & SONS (PVT.) LTD. VS THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 170, 171 & 120. Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000, Ss. 10, 2(3) & 9 | Refund |
Issuance of income tax refunds Complaint against failure to provide taxpayer opportunity of hearing and unilateral reduction of refund amount with no compensation for delayed refund---Contention of Department was that said complaint was that not maintainable under Read More... |
2021 PTD 344 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS M/S COMMUNICATION CITY (PVT.) LIMITED, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.133 & Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 50 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Deduction of tax at source--Scope-Assessee entered into different agreements with certain companies based in United Kingdom and United States and in that behalf made payments to them but no withholding tax was deducted under S.50(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2021 PTD 359 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2021 |
M/S LIBERTY CAR PARKING (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (IN ALL CASES) VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (EX-COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / WEALTH TAX), LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Wealth Tax Act 1963 S. 2 (18) & Civil Procedure Code 1908-VI, R.14 & O. XXIX, R. 1 | Principal officer/Appeal/ Merit |
Wealth Tax Appeals filed by a company without a resolution from the Board of Directors, but duly signed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)--Sufficient compliance---Ratification of appeals--- Scope-Company was a juristic entity and it could duly authorize any Read More... |
2021 PTD 379 (2021) 123 TAX 5 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2021 |
M/S SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN VS THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.124 & 170. Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 10, 2(3) & 9 | Refunds |
Issuance of income tax refunds---Assessment giving effect to an order---Complaint against failure of Department in giving effect to order of Appellate Tribunal whereby complainant / taxpayer was held entitled to tax refund---Validity---Department stated that after Read More... |
2021 PTD 416 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 199 | Alternate remedy |
Art. 199-Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court-Tax matters-Show-cause notice(s) seeking recovery of tax-- Alternate remedy--- Scope When revenue authority had already interpreted relevant provisions making statutory remedies illusory; and where petitioners Read More... |
2021 PTD 460 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute---Construction of-Scope-Fiscal statute is to be strictly construed. Amendment in statutory provisions--Use and effect of word "substitute"---Scope--Term substitute may be defined as "taking place of another and it may be employed to signify Read More... |
2021 PTD 460 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37A, Division VII of Part I of First Schedule. Finance Act (XXIX of 2016), S.5 | Capital gains on disposal of securities |
Capital gains on disposal of securities Amendment in rates of tax on capital gains on disposal of securities vide Finance Act, 2016 -Scope- Petitioners impugned show-cause notices issued to them regarding payment of tax on capital gains, inter alia, on ground that Read More... |
2021 PTD 460 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37A, Division VII of Part I of First Schedule. Finance Act (XXIX of 2016), S.5 | Capital gains on disposal of securities |
Capital gains on disposal of securities Amendment in rates of tax on capital gains on disposal of securities vide Finance Act, 2016 Retrospective effect of such amendment--- Scope---Question before High Court was whether benefit of amendment in rates of tax on Read More... |
2021 PTD 460 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
Nestle Pakistan Ltd. Through Senior Manager Legal and Another VS Federation Of Pakistan Through Secretary Ministry of Law And 6 Others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 230, 208 & 209. SRO No.115(1)/2015 dated 09.02.2015 | Functions and Powers of DG I&I |
Directorate General (Intelligence and Investigation), Inland Revenue ("DG I&I"), functions and powers of---Conferment of powers to officers of DG I&I without specifying functions and jurisdiction of DG I&I Scope-Petitioners impugned SRO No.115(1)/2015 Read More... |
2021 PTD 521 | (2021)123 TAX 96 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
SINDH CLUB KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SOUTH ZONE, KARACHI |
Income Tax Act of 1922 S. 9 & 10 | Members club (social club)/ Tax payable |
Members club (social club)---Tax payable---Levy of income tax on income generated from accommodation services provided by a members’ Read More... |
2021 PTD 658 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 209(8A) | Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities |
Change of taxing jurisdiction---Scope---Petitioners impugned orders whereby their taxing jurisdiction was changed from Regional Tax Office (RTO) to the Large Taxpayers Office (LTO) at another city, on the ground that orders were made without jurisdiction and were Read More... |
2021 PTD 689 | (2021) 123 TAX 346 | 2021 PTCL 39 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
GUL AYAZ PLASTIC INDUSTRY VS TRIBAL AREAS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, WAPDA HOUSE THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND 6 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.13(2)(A) & 159. Sales Tax Act (VII OF 1990), Ss.3 & 13 (2)(a). Notifications SRO No. 1212(I)/2018 dated 5-10-2018 | Advance Income Tax and Sales Tax |
Recovery through electricity bills---Exemption---Petitioner (located in Federal Tribal Areas) was aggrieved of demand of authorities for collection of advance income tax and sales tax from petitioner through monthly electricity bills---Validity---Through Read More... |
2021 PTD 795 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
M/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN VS THE COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, COS. III, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 156, 80D & 136 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake---Scope and amplitude of rectification powers available with Department under S.156 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Mistake apparent on record not requiring any further evidence / investigation---Imposition of minimum tax on Read More... |
2021 PTD 913 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
M/S STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN VS THE COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, COS. III, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 156, 80D & 136 | Minimum tax on income of certain persons |
State-owned Insurance Corporation---Special provisions for computation of income tax upon profits and gains of business of insurance under S.26 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Imposition of minimum tax under S.80D of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on Read More... |
2021 PTD 913 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
SAPPHIRE TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FBR, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 5A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 73. Companies Act 2017, Ss. 240 & 243 | Money Bill |
Money Bill---Scope---Bypass of regular Legislative process by unmerited recourse to Money Bills-Tax on undistributed profits of public limited companies---Section 5A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, vires of---Petitioner’s impugned S.5A of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2021 PTD 971 | (2021) 124 TAX 589 | 2021 PTCL 468 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2021 |
MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD. REFINERY, P.O. MORGAH, RAWALPINDI THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE VS CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss.120 & 177 | Audit, selection for/ Opportunity before selection |
Principle---Taxpayer assailed selection of its case for audit under S.177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Plea raised by taxpayer was that no opportunity was afforded before selecting its case for audit---Validity---Taxpayer was communicated by Commissioner Audit, Read More... |
2021 PTD 1088 | (2022) 125 TAX 473 | 2021 PTCL 600 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
MAJEED FABRICS (PVT) LTD AND 36 OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF ENERGY (POWER DIVISION), ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 159, 235 & Second Sched. Part-IV, Cl.66 | Exemption |
Expression ‘unless there is in force a certificate issued under subsection (1) of S.159 relating to the collection or deduction of such tax,---Exemption or lower rate certificate---Applicability---Appellants-taxpayers claimed that they were registered Read More... |
2021 PTD 1136 | (2021) 124 TAX 223 | 2021 LHC 961 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MUHAMMAD YOUNAS VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 111 & 122 | Unexplained income or assets |
Amendment of assessments---Mandatory show-cause notice and opportunity for taxpayer to file reply to same---Credit entries in Bank accounts(s) of taxpayer---Computation of “net income’ / “total income” chargeable to tax---Obligation of Read More... |
2021 PTD 1223 | (2022) 125 TAX 166 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MUHAMMAD YOUNAS VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX OF 2001) Ss. 111 & 39. Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Ss.13 & 30 | Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income and assets---Nature of S.111 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Charging to tax of unexplained income or assets under head of “income from other sources”---Legislative lapse in non-inclusion of “unexplained income or assets Read More... |
2021 PTD 1223 | (2022) 125 TAX 166 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Tax by a legislative act authority |
17). Before parting with this judgment we may observe that: No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. A tax can only be imposed by a legislative Act and not on executive order. It thus embodies the democratic Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Adverse Action |
For taking any adverse action, affording of an opportunity is prerequisite. An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of hearing to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Show Cause Notice |
The Hon’ble Lahore High Court in the judgment reported as 2013 PTD 1536 PLD 2013 Lah. 634 where their lordship observed as under:“Show cause notice is not a casual correspondence or a tool or license to commence a Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Due Process of Law |
The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 Section: 24A | Fair Trial |
The “fair trial” and “due process of law” as has been guaranteed by the Article 10-A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The fair trial consists issuance of notice by the competent authority and Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Audi Alterm Partem |
Audi alteram partem - Principle of - We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the impugned order was passed without providing/affording opportunity of being heard, hence violated the well know principle of “audi alteram Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Right of access to justice |
Right of access to justice - An order affecting the rights of a party cannot be passed without an opportunity of heaving to that party. There are certain basic norms of justice. One of the cardinal principles of such basic norms is that Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Deemed assessment |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Malafide Intention |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 122(5A) & 122(9), General Clauses Act, 1897 S 24A | Mandatory notice |
ACIR passed orders for the amendment of deemed assessment u/s 120 of Ordinance without service of mandatory notice.Passing of order in haste with malafide intention of the officer - The above observations of the ADC-IR clearly depicts Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS /S PUNJAB POULTRY FEED (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S 133, 133(5) ITO 1979 S 50, 62 | Opportunity of hearing |
The questions of Law involved in the cases arisen out of liability being enforced by the Revenue have not been attended to and dilated upon by the Appellate Tribunal.” These appeals are remanded to learned Income Tax Appellate Read More... |
2020 PTD 224 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S .9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 | Insurance Premium |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred treaties. Both the insurance Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163, Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.107 | Avoidance of double taxation |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Pakistan, as per the definition in the aforementioned articles of the referred Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Deduction of Income Tax |
Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More... |
2020 PTD 7 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HONGKONG HUIHUA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DIVISION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)(c), 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Pakistan source Income |
Petitioner was an international company having its permanent office in Pakistan and was awarded a contract for which supplies and services were sought from both foreign and domestic sources- Petitioner sought issuance of tax exemption Read More... |
2020 PTD 7 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Writ jurisdiction |
In case titled The Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha (AIR 2012 S.C. 2250) it has been held as under: “Ordinarily a writ application does not lie against a charge sheet or show-cause notice for the Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice/Petition |
In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Petition against Show Cause |
In case titled M/s. Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others (2006) 12 SCC 33 it has been held as under: ‘’Although ordinarily a writ Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a writ Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Petition against Show Cause |
In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice |
In another case titled State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahma Datt Sharma and others (AIR 1987 SC 943 = 1987 SCR (2) 444) it has been held as follows: “The High Court was not justified in quashing the show-cause notice. When a show-cause Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
M/S. PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(41)I, 11(6), 101, 101(3), 122-B, 152(2A)(5)(7)(a)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) | Show Cause Notice/Petition |
In light of the above principles, what needs to be examined is whether the instant petitions are maintainable. The sole ground agitated by the petitioner is that since the question involved and/ or raised in the impugned notices is Read More... |
2020 PTD 110 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
M/S. A.F. FERGUSON & CO. & OTHERS VS PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 2(10), 2(26), 32, 80, 80(2), 92, 92(1) 92(2), 92(3), 92(4), 92(5), 93 | Taxation of association |
Principles of taxation of association of persons - Filing of individual returns of income by the partners of firm of their total income - Amount received by a partner from the firm in hand of partner - Exemption - Firm and its partners - Read More... |
2020 PTD 27 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) | Security Deposits |
Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More... |
2020 PTD 153 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS GRAYS LEASING LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S: 133, 133(5) Law: Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sec: 12(19), 62 Law: Income Tax Rules, 1982 S: 8(5)(j) (a) | Lease Key Money |
Undeniably respondent-taxpayer recorded the lease key money as liability to be adjusted as a sale proceeds at the expiry of lease period, therefore, there is no justification to tax the security deposit under Section 12(19), considering Read More... |
2020 PTD 153 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Black Listed or deregistered |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Flying Invoices |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 10, 11 & 21 | Pecuniary jurisdiction |
So far as the Question No. 1 is concerned, the same pertains to pecuniary jurisdiction of the officer, who has passed Order-in-Original. In a case involving contravention on the part of a registered person with respect of assessment of Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS Messrs GREENVELLY PREMIUM SUPER MARKET (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.122, 132, 131 & 133 | Addition deleted |
FACTS: the respondent is running the business of departmental stores. The respondent e filed return of income by declaring loss of Rs.15,734,624/- for tax year 20l4. Respondent selected for audit, deemed assessment was amended under Read More... |
2020 PTD 260 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX
OFFICER, PESHAWAR VS SAFEER JAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S: 12(18), 13(aa) | Gift deeds |
Whether gift amounts received by one partner from other partners in the firm/AOP could be added by the tax officer under S. 12(18) of the erstwhile Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Held, that plain reading of S. 12(18) of the Ordinance Read More... |
2020 PTD 278 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
D.G.KHAN CEMENT CO. LTD. ETC. VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 174, 173(3), 177 | Maintenance of Record |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)- Ss. 174(3) & proviso- Records, information collection and audit- Maintenance of record by taxpayer- Statutorily required time-period for maintenance of such record- Maintenance of record after lapse of statutorily required Read More... |
2020 PTD 2111 (2021)123 TAX 361 2021 PTCL 130 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
SHAKIR ALI RAJPUT VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 115(3)(b), 115(3)(d), 231-A, 236-P | Resident/Overseas Pakistani are exempt of filing of income tax return |
Complainant was a Non-Resident/Overseas Pakistani who was aggrieved of deduction of tax on his remittances exceeding fifty thousand rupees. The Complainant, who was Non-Resident working abroad and who Read More... |
2020 PTD 642 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SHEHARYAR AHMED VS THE STATE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 148 | Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)/ Grant of Bail |
Import of a vehicle under a fake Proceed Realization Certificate (PRC)---Allegedly, accused, Clearing Agent, was an instrumental in the entire rip-off for illegally importing a vehicle with intention to cause loss to Read More... |
2020 PTD 645 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-12, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 9, 11(b), 12(3)(b), 15, 163 | Premium Paid to Non-Resident Companies |
In view of the definition, it is admitted position that both the insurance companies are non-resident companies and having no permanent establishment in Read More... |
2020 PTD 386 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) REGIONAL TAX
OFFICER, PESHAWAR VS SAFEER JAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 12(18), 13(aa) | Cash Withdrawal from Share of AOP |
8. A plain reading of section 12(18) of the Ordinance shows that the said provision is attracted when loans, advances, and gifts are received in cash. However, Read More... |
2020 PTD 278 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
M/S BAWANY SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH SENIOR MANAGER TAXATION VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 132 | Bank accounts had been frozen, which offended in Constitutionally protected fundamental right |
Petitioner / taxpayer sought direction of High Court under Constitutional jurisdiction to set aside order of Appellate Tribunal whereby taxpayer’s application under O.XXXIX Rr. 1 & 2, C.P.C was rejected---Contention of Read More... |
2020 PTD 696 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF VS THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Rectification of mistake---Limitation |
Taxpayer filed normal returns for the tax year 2013 which was deemed to have been assessed under S. 120(1), ITO 2001---Assessing authority observed that the taxpayer was engaged in the business of supply of medicines, therefore, normal Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF VS THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Invoking the provisions of S.122(5) without any material |
Taxpayer himself had declared income under normal tax regime as well as under final tax regime which stood subjected to withholding provisions of 153(1)(a) of ITO 2001---Assessing authority without any basis presumed that all sales were Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF VS THE CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(1)(a), 115(4), 120(1), 122, 153, 153(7), 221, 221(4) | Rectification of mistake/Error apparent from the record/ two views or opinions/ Limitation |
Application of S. 221 ITO 2001 is only permissible if the error is apparent, Read More... |
2020 PTD 698 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MESSRS K.B. CORPORATION AND ANOTHER VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 140, 148, 162, 162(1), 228 | invocation of erroneous sections of law/ Collection of tax at import stage |
Section 33, ST Act, 1990 contains penal clauses and can only be invoked for contravention of respective provisions of ST Act, 1990---Section 148 ITO 2001 prescribes the procedure for collection of income tax at import stage by the Read More... |
2020 PTD 713 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 | Documents in custody/ Burden of proof/Penalty |
Penalty, imposition of---Taxpayer was aggrieved of confirmation of additions to value of property as well as foreign remittances made by the authorities. |
2020 PTD 733 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MUSHARAF GULZAR AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER IR, RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 182 | Administration of justice |
Principle of consistency---Object, purpose and scope---Object of principle of consistency is to maintain uniformity and consistency of views/decisions in different Benches of Court/Tribunal and is aimed at to foster, develop and Read More... |
2020 PTD 733 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S RASHID AND SAQIB TRADING COMPANY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Expression "mistake apparent from the record |
Where rectification application dismissed by Appellate Tribunal, the Reference application before Court is not maintainable because the order of the Tribunal on application does not merge into final order--- Where the rectification Read More... |
2020 PTD 782 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD VS ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 221 | Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court |
Review petition filed against (tax) Reference decided by the High Court-Power of High Court to convert review petition into an application for correction of clerical error---Scope---In the exercise of its Reference jurisdiction under S. Read More... |
2020 PTD 782 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL) RTO, ABBOTTABAD VS ED-ZUBLIN AG GERMANY and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133 | Conversion of one type of proceedings into another |
Conversion of one type of proceedings into another---No fetters or bar could be placed on the High Court and or the Supreme Court to convert and treat one type of proceedings into another Read More... |
2020 PTD 785 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S FORMANITE HOUSING SCHEME, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1)(b), 120(1), 122(9), 133 | Unexplained income or assets---Findings of fact |
Taxpayer's declaration of its income was disputed by the Taxation Officer while placing reliance on the deposits made in the Bank accounts maintained by the taxpayer, on the basis whereof show- cause notice was issued which culminated in Read More... |
2020 PTD 799 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ELITE ESTATE (PVT.) LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 152 | Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company |
Payment for consultancy/technical services provided by foreign non-resident company---Exemption from deduction of withholding tax---In terms the consultancy agreement executed between the parties, the foreign company was to provide Read More... |
2020 PTD 802 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
BANK ALFALAH LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 176, 176(1)(a) | Income tax authorities had vast powers in respect of getting information |
Privileged information---Fishing inquiry--- Petitioner Bank assailed notice issued by income tax authorities regarding providing of details in connection with debit/credit card machines installed by petitioner to different commercial Read More... |
2020 PTD 827 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 88a, 103, 122(5A), 122(9), 133, 133(1) | Share profits of company to be added to taxable income |
Findings of facts---Scope---Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal on the ground that it ignored the provisions of S.88A of ITO 2001 while holding that share from Association of Persons (AOP) was not liable to be charged in Read More... |
2020 PTD 873 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE VS EMCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 34(5), 122(5A), 133, 133(5) | Reference to High Court |
Scope only substantial legal questions can be examined which may arise from an order passed by the Appellate Tribunal whereas questions requiring no interpretation of any provision of law, rules or regulations or its application on Read More... |
2020 PTD 904 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE VS M/s. GHANI GLASS LIMITED |
income Tax Ordinance 2001 221 | Rectification of mistake/ judgment announced beyond 120 days became nullity in the eyes of law |
Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal whereby it had re-fixed the case for hearing and adjudication despite the fact that it had already decided the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2020 PTD 937 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
M/S. HONDA PALACE, HYDERABAD VS THE CIR WIIT ZONE, RTO, HYDERABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(7), 165(5), 182, 182(1)(1A)(2) | Failure to furnish statement---No revenue loss |
Appellant assailed orders passed by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue whereby he had charged penalty under serial No. (1A) of S. 182(1) ITO 2001 for delay in filing statements under S. 165 ITO 2001--- Contentions of appellant were that Read More... |
2020 PTD 940 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
M/S. HONDA PALACE, HYDERABAD VS THE CIR WIIT ZONE, RTO, HYDERABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 153(7), 165(5), 182, 182(1)(1A)(2) | penalty would be leviable when there is a tax payable/ Failure to furnish statement |
Section 182, ITO 2001is not a charging section, rather it is penal in nature---Intention of legislature in enacting S.182 is not to generate revenue---Section 182 cannot be used as a source of resource mobilization or collecting Read More... |
2020 PTD 940 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS Z&J HYGIENIC PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 133(5), Clause 45 of Part IV of the Second Schedule | HS Code of textile articles |
Reasons for decision---Scope---Dept. assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal whereby it had remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals)---Appellate Tribunal had not determined the core issue whether HS Code of diaper was Read More... |
2020 PTD 948 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS ASHRAF SUGAR MILLS LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(l), 60A, 122, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9), 133, 133(5), 174(2) | Reduction of a taxpayer’s claim for deduction |
Reduction of a taxpayer’s claim for deduction. Worker’s Welfare Fund. Reference to High Court. Findings of facts. Scope Applicant-Dept. assailed the order of Appellate Tribunal wherein it had given findings of facts that the Read More... |
2020 PTD 962 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
The Secretary, Revenue Division Islamabad/STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN KARACHI VS NONE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114 | Return of Income for non-residents/ foreign currency account |
Return of Income for non-residents. Suo motu investigation against systemic maladministration by Dept. as non-residents were being required to file return of income by Banks before opening a foreign currency account. Scope. Federal Tax Read More... |
2020 PTD 966 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS MALIK USMAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 13(1)(aa), 111, 111(1)(a), 111(1)(b), 122(1), 122(5), 133, 133(5) | ORDER |
Findings of facts. Scope. Applicant-Dept. assailed the order of Appellate Tribunal wherein it had given findings of facts that the assessing authority had treated the credit entries appearing in the Bank accounts as business Read More... |
2020 PTD 968 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122(1)(5A), 122(9) | Amendment of assessment. Condemned unheard |
Appellant attacked the order-in-original on the ground that mandatory show-cause notice was posted one day after the date fixed for appearance of appellant. Section 122 of ITO, 2001provided that Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM JAMALI ST AGENCIES, KARACHI
VS CIR, ZONE-III, LTU-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122(1)(5A), 122(9) | Appellant attacked the order-in-original on the ground that mandatory show-cause notice was posted one day after the date fixed for appearance of appe |
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10-A, Amendment of assessment. Right of fair trial. Opportunity of being heard. Scope Fair trial and due process of law are guaranteed by the Constitution. Fair trial means issuance of notice by the Read More... |
2020 PTD 1045 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR VS THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(1), 120, 170, 170(4), 171, 171(2)(c), 235 | Delay in issuance of refunds. |
Delay in issuance of refunds. Scope. Complaint against non-issuance of refund and for compensation under Ss. 170 and 171 of the ITO 2001. Complaint sought findings against Dept. for inordinate delay in issuance of refund on account of Read More... |
2020 PTD 1057 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2020 |
M/s. IKRAM ULLAH ASSOCIATES thorugh directos and 8 others VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Cheif Secretary at Secretariat Peshawar and 17 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(29), 148, 150, 152(1), 153, 154, 156, 156A, 159, 233, 233A, 234(5) | Exemption from Income Tax/ Applicability |
Petitioners were permanent residents of erstwhile provincially Administered Tribal Areas (PATA) and they were aggrieved of deduction of advance income tax by Provincial Government from their work bills and they were asked to seek Read More... |
2020 PTD 1060 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
CITY SUPER STORE-II, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(3), 114(4), 120, 120(3), 120(4), 121, 177 | Best judgment assessment |
Taxpayer assailed orders passed by Assessing Officer and Commissioner (Appeals) whereby they had made additions in his declared income. Taxpayer, at first, was issued notice under S. 177 of the ITO Read More... |
2020 PTD 1084 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
CITY SUPER STORE-II, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114(3), 114(4), 120, 120(3), 120(4), 121, 177 | Administration of Justice |
Where the statute requires a particular act to be done in a particular manner then the act must be performed in that manner alone and all other manners of doing that act would not be permissible under the Read More... |
2020 PTD 1084 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
SHAKIR ALI RAJPUT VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 115(3)(b), 115(3)(d), 231-A, 236-P | Cash withdrawal |
The complainant, an overseas Pakistani/non-resident (NR) is working in Saudi Arabia. According to the complainant, he remits money from abroad through proper banking channel. However, at the time of withdrawal, the Bank deducts tax when the transaction exceeds fifty Read More... |
2020 PTD 642 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ZAK RE-ROLLING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3(1A), 47 | Capital Value Tax |
10). Read More... |
2020 PTD 382 (2020) 121 TAX 201 2020 SCMR 131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS GHANI GLASS LIMITED, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 | Applications for recalling of order passed by Appellate Tribunal |
Applications for recalling of order passed by Appellate Tribunal-Taxpayer had sought recalling of order earlier passed by Appellate Tribunal; wherein dept.al appeals were accepted and order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) was reversed- Grievance of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1162 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
HUB POWER CO. LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 14, 136 & Second Sched., Part I Item 76-A | Exemption from total income |
Special exemptions for Power Company-Interest or profit derived on deposits--Scope---Question before the High Court was whether "term deposits" held with Banks by Power Company fell within the purview of the exemption provided for in Item 76-A of Part-1 of the Read More... |
2019 PTD 1187 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
HUB POWER CO. LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Interpretation of Statues | Words “and†& “orâ€--- |
-Words “and” & “or”---Statutory construction---Words “and” & “or” were interchangeable and the word “and” could be construed as “or” and vice versa; if such change was necessary to Read More... |
2019 PTD 1187 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2019 |
SAJJAD AHMED VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Ss. 2(3)(b)(ii), 9(2)(b) & 10(1)--- Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(1), 127 & 170(4) & (5) | Refund of tax amount/ delay in |
Refund of tax amount, delay in-Taxpayer was aggrieved of delay in process of his tax refund- Indeed--Objections raised under S.9(2)(b) of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was misconceived as taxpayer had already availed legal remedy of appeal for non-passing of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1198 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2019 |
INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, RTO II, KARACHI |
Statutes | Inherent jurisdiction/ Administration of justice |
Inherent jurisdiction--Applicability-Principle-Statutes normally do not provide for each and every conceivable eventuality---Court, in respect of some unforeseen events arising in any case for which no provision has been made, are deemed to have inherent Read More... |
2019 PTD 1201 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR VS M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 133, 122 & 120 | Amendment of assessment---Show-cause notice to taxpayer- |
Amendment of assessment---Show-cause notice to taxpayer-Reference to High Court-Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Grounds for amendment of assessment of taxpayer --Addition of new ground/ allegation for amendment of assessment at Read More... |
2019 PTD 1219 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR VS M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 133 & 132 | Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 |
Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001---Questions of law Scope-Under S. 133 of the ITO, 2001 High Court had jurisdiction to decide any question of law arising out of an order of the Appellate Tribunal even if such matter had not been argued or Read More... |
2019 PTD 1219 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) | Taxable income/ Contributions made by employers |
Taxable income”-----Scope----Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution (“the Institution”)---Term ‘income’ used in S. 2(24) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was of the widest Read More... |
2019 PTD 928 (2019)119 TAX 359 2019 PTCL 102 2019 SCMR 439 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, PESHAWAR VS M/s. PAKISTAN MINERAL WATER BOTTLING (PVT.) LIMITED, SWABI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 131 & 140 | Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal |
Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al representative regretted the recovery Read More... |
2019 PTD 1219 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) | Taxable income/ Contributions made by employers to social security |
Taxable income---Exemption-----Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution (“the Institution”)----Whether income received by the Institution in the form of contributions was Read More... |
2019 PTD 928 (2019)119 TAX 359 2019 PTCL 102 2019 SCMR 439 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PESHAWAR VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, NWFP EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 20, 23, 2nd Schedule, Pt. I, Cl. 62(1) | Taxable income-Exemption- Retrospective effect |
Contributions made by employers to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution----Tax assessment year falling under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (“the 1979 Ordinance”)----Plea that benefit of exemption from tax Read More... |
2019 PTD 928 (2019)119 TAX 359 2019 PTCL 102 2019 SCMR 439 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/S ASEAN INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ROAD NORTH I-8/2, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 124 & 152 | Framing of fresh assessment on remand of case |
Framing of fresh assessment on remand of case---Taxpayer, who filed income tax returns allegedly failed to discharge his responsibilities under the law to act as withholding agent---Show-cause notice issued to taxpayer—Tax payer filed reply, which was not Read More... |
2019 PTD 1235 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
MESSRS THE ATTOCK OIL CO. LTd VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 4B,2(63) | Super tax for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons |
Super tax for rehabilitation of temporarily displaced persons----Tax to be levied by law only----Procedure with respect to Money Bill----Bill not deemed to be a money bill----Specific purpose of tax mentioned in the taxing Read More... |
2019 PTD 934 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD TARIQ KOMBOH VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD, ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(5) | Expression completed tax year |
Expression completed tax year---Scope-Expression completed tax year cannot be construed to enlarge limitation period beyond twelve months ending on 30th day of June of relevant calendar Read More... |
2019 PTD 1238 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD TARIQ KOMBOH VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD, ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 114(5) & 122-C | Return of income---Show-cause notice/ Limitation |
Taxpayer assailed show-cause notice issued by authorities on grounds that it was time barred due to conclusion of tax year well before issuance of notice---Indeed---Relevant tax year could not be considered complete, for purposes of S. 114(5) of ITO, 2001 on last Read More... |
2019 PTD 1238 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS ASEAN INTERNATIONAL ISLAMABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 140 | Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal |
Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al Read More... |
2019 PTD 1227 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS ASEAN INTERNATIONAL ISLAMABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 140 | Recovery in disregard to stay order granted by Appellate Tribunal |
Assessing Officer, disregarding the stay granted by Appellate Tribunal, made recovery from the taxpayer---Taxpayer filed application against said recovery, being illegal, high handed tantamounted to contempt of court--- Dept.al Read More... |
2019 PTD 1227 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR VS MESSRS MUHAMMAD RAMZAN & CO., KANDHKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(64), 4(5), 8, 9, 9(5), 11, 12(2), 122(5A), 169 | Taxable income---Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT) |
Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT), imposition of---Applicability---Taxpayer was aggrieved of calculation of taxable income by assessing officer and charging Internally Displaced Persons Tax (IDPT) at 5% on tax payable---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) Read More... |
2019 PTD 1256 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
RANA NADEEM AHMED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122C & 144 | Return of income--Amendment of assessment for non-furnishing of return |
Amendment of assessment for non-furnishing of return---Procedure and verification by dept.--- Taxpayer impugned order passed by dept. under S. 122C of the ITO, 2001 inter alia, on the ground, that the same had been passed without taking into consideration response Read More... |
2019 PTD 1264 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 5.9 | Chargeability of tax/ receipt was not sole test of chargeability of tax |
Adjudication to determine whether tax was chargeable on receipt of revenue / fee by taxpayer--- Burden of proof---Scope---Anything which was not income could not be treated as income and receipt was not sole test of chargeability of tax--- Initial burden to show Read More... |
2019 PTD 1278 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss.22 & 133 | Chargeability of income tax-Income from business or profession |
Non-competition fee-Nature of receipt of non- competition fee-"Revenue receipt" and "capital receipt"--Distinction- Onus on Dept. to establish chargeability of income tax on capital receipt-Scope-Question before the High Court was whether "non- competition fee" Read More... |
2019 PTD 1278 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS AMEER ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHARI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1), 133(5) | Taxing statute---Charges upon subject of a taxation |
Taxing statute---Charges upon subject of a taxation statute must be imposed by clear and unambiguous language, since in some degree the same operated as penalties --Such subject was not to be taxed unless language of a statute clearly imposed such obligation and Read More... |
2019 PTD 1278 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
WASHDEV VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LARKANA ZONE, R.T.O., SUKKUR |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.121(1)(d), 122 & 138(1) | Tax assessment---Show-cause notice, non-compliance of-Limitation |
Taxpayer was aggrieved of assessment order passed by appellate authorities for not providing record for audit by the taxpayer---Taxpayer assailed that said notice and true copy was never received by him and that such proceedings were not in his Read More... |
2019 PTD 1286 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SPECIAL RTO, MULTAN VS M/S ATTIQ-UR-REHMAN, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 177, 182(1)(8)(a), 214C | Selection for audit by the Board |
Failure of taxpayer to produce the record of documents on receipt of first notice-Board selected the case of taxpayer for audit of his tax affairs-Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue imposed penalty on failure of taxpayer to join audit proceedings---Commissioner Read More... |
2019 PTD 1294 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
M/S. DIAMOND METALS (AOP) THROUGH ATTORNEY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 159(3) | Exemption or lower rate certificate |
Certificates issued under subsection (3) (since omitted) of S.159 of the ITO, 2001-Certificates to remain in force until rescinded by FBR despite omission of subsection (3) of S.159 of the ITO, 2001 by the Legislature--Scope-Question before High Court was whether Read More... |
2019 PTD 1296 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD VS C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 115, 114, 122, 120, 154 & 169 | Persons not required to furnish return of income |
Tax collected or deducted as a final tax-Scope-Appellant filed statement in terms of S. 115(4) of ITO, 2001 declaring export receipts covered under Final Tax Regime for the years 2014 and 2015 respectively---Declared receipts were deemed to be treated as assessment Read More... |
2019 PTD 1317 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD VS C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 169, 115, 114 & 154-- Income Tax Rules, 2002, Rr. 34 & 39- | Persons not required to furnish return of income |
Tax collected or deducted as a final tax-Persons not required to furnish a return of income-Return of income-Export-Statement in lieu of Return of income-Scope-Section 169(3) provided that where all the income derived by a person is subject to final taxation, he is Read More... |
2019 PTD 1317 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD VS C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 115, 114, 169 & 120 | Persons not required to furnish return of income |
Tax collected or deducted as a final tax Assessments---Scope---Filing of income tax return and of statement are two different regimes and run parallel to each other and in case a person is obliged to file his statement merely in terms of S. 115(4), he stands Read More... |
2019 PTD 1317 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD VS C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 120, 114,115, | Persons not required to furnish return of income |
Persons not required to furnish a return of income-Scope-Section 120 has its genesis in and relates to the filing or failure thereof of a return of income---Subsection (4) of S. 120 merely gives the Commissioner the power to issue notice to the taxpayer in case the Read More... |
2019 PTD 1317 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FA1SALABAD VS C.I.R., CORPORATE ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5A) | Amendment of assessment-Pre-conditions |
Amendment of assessment-Pre-conditions-Scope- Two conditions are mandatory for invoking S. 122(5A), that the order should be erroneous in law or facts as well as prejudicial to the interest of Revenue and where one condition exists and the other is missing, Read More... |
2019 PTD 1317 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS M.F. & CO., PROP. FAISAL, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, R.T.O.-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 111 & 122 | Assessment order, revision of |
Assessment order, revision of--Precondition--- Assessment order is required to be amended on basis of "definite information "---Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue court invoke, 5.122(1) of ITO, 2001 for acquiring jurisdiction to amend order under S.122(4) read with Read More... |
2019 PTD 1347 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS M.F. & CO., PROP. FAISAL, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, R.T.O.-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 111(1)(b), (c) & 122- | Assessment order, revision of/ Statutory notice |
Statutory notice, non-issuance of---Taxpayer was engaged in import and subsequent sale of textile items--Authorities initiated proceedings under S.122(5) of ITO, 2001 against the taxpayer on the basis of information with regard to purchase of a property by Read More... |
2019 PTD 1347 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE C-4, KARACHI (IN BOTH CASES)
VS M/S NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI (IN BOTH CASES) |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 17 & 32(1) | Interest earned by financial institutions on Government securities |
Whether the same was liable to be taxed on accrual or on receipt basis-Hybrid' system of accounting---Scope--- Bank/assessee in the present case maintained its accounts on the accrual system but accounted for interest on Government securities on receipt basis, also Read More... |
2019 PTD 1377 (2019)119 TAX 481 2019 PTCL 520 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER VS RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Refund of Advace Tax u/s 148 |
Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER VS RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Tax Credit u/s 65D |
Learned counsel for H.M. Extraction also submitted that over the years a huge sum of money (running into several crores of rupees) had accumulated in favor of Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PETITIONER(S): H.M. EXTRACTION GHEE AND OIL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER VS RESPONDENT(S): FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 65D, 100C, 148, 159(1)(a) | Refund barred by Limitation |
We are reminded here of what was said by this Court in Pfizer Laboratories Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others PLD 1998 SC 64 ("Pfizer case"). The facts Read More... |
2019 PTD 1479 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
SHAFI ULLAH VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION), PESHAWAR AND 2 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | provision of law |
Every provision of law had to be interpreted so as to make the law workable and no redundancy could be attached or attributed to the provision or the legislative Read More... |
2019 PTD 739 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Cancellation of assessment w.r.t Time Limitation |
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Pending Proceedings |
In “Collector of Sales Tax and Central Excise, LTU, Karachi v. Messrs Pak Suzuki Co. Ltd., Karachi”(PTCL 2016 CL. 63), the Hon’ble Supreme Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133(1) | Retrospective Effect |
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case learned ITAT was justified to cancel the assessments made under section 62 for the assessment years 1986-87 to 1991-92 Read More... |
2019 PTCL 385 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) | Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution |
Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on Read More... |
2019 PTD 587 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) | Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment |
Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued Read More... |
2019 PTD 598 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 4, 49, 49(1)(2)(3)(4), 80, 80(1) | Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution |
Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on income of Federal and Provincial Governments and local authorities under S.49 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether certain statutory Read More... |
2019 PTD 587 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22(2), 114(4), 120, 122-C, 122(5-A), 122(5A), 172, 218(2), 218(12) | Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment |
Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued to the taxpayer, but on due date neither anybody attended the office nor any application for adjournment was filed---Assessing authority made provisional assessment Read More... |
2019 PTD 598 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Improve the case |
At the same time the AR also argued that the appellant has already faced the cumbersome round of assessment at the first stance therefore, another round would have meant that the appellant would have been subjected to another round of cumbersome proceedings which is Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Tax dept. cannot dictate taxpayers |
The learned counsel by placing reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan reported as Commissioner of Income Tax v. Pakistan Industrial Engineering Agencies Limited (1992 PTD 954), argued that the |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Original action illegal, all subsequent action illegal. |
The things which cannot be done directly are not capable to be done indirectly 1993 PLD SC 473, Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif v. President of Pakistan and others. Where the original action is void then the subsequent actions and proceedings there from would also be Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | coram- non-judice |
If the power has been exercised on a non-consideration or non-application of mind to relevant factors, the exercise of power will be regarded as manifestly erroneous. If a power whether judicial, quasi judicial or administrative is exercised on the basis of facts Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Decision without reason |
If the decision is given without any reasons then one of the two most essential ingredients will be missed. It is on the basis of the reasons which support order that the same can be challenged in an appeal. The said order of CIR(A) is cryptic and devoid of reasons. Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
OIL AND GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 49, 4 & 80 , Constitution, Arts. 165 & 165-A | Exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution |
Liability of income tax on statutory bodies/entities---- Benefit of exemption of levy of income on income of Federal and Provincial Governments and local authorities under S.49 of the ITO, 2001---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether certain statutory Read More... |
2019 PTD 587 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Last fact finding forum |
The settled principles regarding administration of justice are that the appellate authorities / judicial and quasi judicial authorities including officials / Administrative or taxing authorities while dispensing justice and exercising judicial or quasi powers are Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Proper investigation and enquiry. |
A careful perusal of the data/reconciliation reveals the fact that the appellant has sufficiently reconciled the figures as declared in withholding tax statement filed under section 165 of the Ordinance and Annex H-l of the income tax return form, therefore, we are Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD NAZIR AHMED VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 114(4), 120, 122-C, 172 & 218(2) | Filing of return of income/Amendment of assessment |
Notice under S.114(4) of the ITO, 2001 for filing of income tax return for relevant year was issued to the taxpayer, but on due date neither anybody attended the office nor any application for adjournment was filed---Assessing authority made provisional assessment Read More... |
2019 PTD 598 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Disallowance expenditure |
Principles of natural justice requires that where a taxpayer produces books of accounts and supporting documents the Assessing Officer shall before disagreeing with such accounts/version, give a notice to the taxpayer of the defects in the accounts and provide an Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 111(1 )(d)(i), 122, 122-A, , 133, 214(c) | Defect in accounts |
Also that the Assessing Officer shall record the explanation of the taxpayer and the basis of computation of total income by the taxpayer in the assessment order. We are persuaded to agree that the IRO did not act in accordance with law while discarding the declared Read More... |
2019 PTD 4 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS MUGHAL ENGINEERING WORKS, RAWALPINDI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O. RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 121(1)(d), 177 | Best judgment assessment / derived income from Engineering Work |
Taxpayer, an individual, who derived income from Engineering Work, filed income tax return-Case of taxpayer was selected for audit under S.177 of the ITO, 2001 and he was required to produce books of account and related documents--Notices issued to the taxpayer Read More... |
2019 PTD 610 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR VS AL-SANA OIL MILLS, SUKKUR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53(2), 113, 113(1), 122(5A), Second Schedule, Part-III, Clause 8 | Tax Liability u/s 113 |
Brief facts of the case as gathered from the record are that the taxpayer is an Individual in the business of manufacturing/distribution of vegetable and Animals Oil and fats is aggrieved by order under section 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance wherein the tax Read More... |
2019 PTD 503 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE VS MESSRS CHAUDHARY DAIRIES LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4), 136(1)(2), First Schedule | Departmental Practice |
11). Even otherwise, the aforesaid notification has been interpreted by the department and the Tribunal consistently as having retrospective effect after the case reported as (1997 PTD (Trib.) 2145) (supra) which had been decided immediately after the amending Read More... |
2019 PTD 452 120 TAX 381 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
RAJA ABDUL GHAFOOR VS CIR, RTO, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111(1) & 122 | Unexplained income or assets/Amendment of assessment/ When law would provide procedure |
Taxpayer filed income tax return for relevant year declaring income subject to Final Tax Regime and income subject to normal regime and dept. assessment income---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) noticed certain serious discrepancies on the part of taxpayer and Read More... |
2019 PTD 751 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS |
Registration Act 1908 S. 17 & 47 | Registration of document |
Registration of document--Time from which registered document operates-Scope-Registered document operates from time when it was presented and executed before concerned Sub-Registrar after completing all codal formalities and payments of required duties, taxes and Read More... |
2019 PTD 741 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 236-W [as inserted by Income Tax (Fourth Amend) Act (XLIX of 2016)]---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S. 17 | Registration of sub-lease/ Withholding of deed by Registration authorities-- |
Registration of sub-lease---Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--Petitioner was aggrieved of withholding of sublease deed registered with Sub-Registrar for non-payment of income tax----Authorities were not justified to withhold documents of petitioner Read More... |
2019 PTD 741 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD. VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AUDIT), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 10A | Show cause was a demand to produce a satisfactory explanation |
Fundamental right to fair trial and due process of law---Issuance of show-cause notice---Scope---Show-cause notice was essentially an instrument whereby authorized person under law informed a person regarding allegation or facts which may form basis for proceedings Read More... |
2019 PTD 692 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2019 |
MESSRS ATTOCK GEN LTD. VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AUDIT), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) | Constitution of Pakistan S. 122(9) & (5) | Art. 199 | Show-cause notice/ Constitutional petition |
Show-cause notice was impugned by petitioner--Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope--Show- cause notice was not an adverse order unless it could be clearly shown to the satisfaction of the Court that it had been issued by an authority not vested with Read More... |
2019 PTD 692 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 236-W [as inserted by Income Tax (Fourth Amend) Act (XLIX of 2016)]---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), S. 17 | Registration of sub-lease/ Withholding of deed by Registration authorities-- |
Registration of sub-lease---Withholding of deed by Registration authorities--Petitioner was aggrieved of withholding of sublease deed registered with Sub-Registrar for non-payment of income tax----Authorities were not justified to withhold documents of petitioner Read More... |
2019 PTD 741 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD MUJAHID QURESHI & 4 OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 114, 115(4), 116, 118, 119, 119(2), 137(1), 177, 214D, 231(3) | Audit, selection |
Admittedly, the audit is sought to be done for the tax year 2015 as also the section 214D was added by the Finance Act, 2015. However, by its very terms, the said provision was intended to be applied retrospectively to the past tax years as an audit can only be Read More... |
2019 PTD 535 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
RAJA ABDUL GHAFOOR VS CIR, RTO, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111(1) & 122 | Unexplained income or assets/Amendment of assessment/ When law would provide procedure |
Taxpayer filed income tax return for relevant year declaring income subject to Final Tax Regime and income subject to normal regime and dept. assessment income---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) noticed certain serious discrepancies on the part of taxpayer and Read More... |
2019 PTD 751 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
SHAHZADA SOHAIL KAMRAN KHAN AND 2 OTHERS VS CHAIRMAN OF STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI AND 8 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 233 | Employee & Commission Agent |
The question whether commission agents of the Corporation are its employees came up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court agreed with the conclusion of the learned Sindh High Court which dismissed the constitutional petitions filed by the commission agents as being Read More... |
2019 PTD 128 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
RAWALPINDI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (RDA) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE (FBR) |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49, 49(1)(2)(4), 80(2), 122(c), 137(2), 138(1) | Levy of Income Tax; autonomous body |
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner- RDA as per Punjab Government Rules of Business, 1974 being attached department of the Province of Punjab is exempted from levy of tax under section 49(2) of the Ordinance, 2001 read with Article 165A Read More... |
2019 PTD 1734 (2019) 119 TAX 420 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
SULTAN AHMED THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS |
Registration Act 1908 S. 17 & 47 | Registration of document |
Registration of document--Time from which registered document operates-Scope-Registered document operates from time when it was presented and executed before concerned Sub-Registrar after completing all codal formalities and payments of required duties, taxes and Read More... |
2019 PTD 741 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
AZEE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED. VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C, 177 & 120 Civil Procedure Code 1908 Rr. 1 & 2 | Audit Policy, 2017/Selection for audit |
Disclosure of parameters for selection for audit----Application of S. 214C(1A) of the ITO, 2001----Interim injunction against audit of taxpayer under ITO, 2001----Scope----Plaintiff / taxpayer’ sought interim injunction to restrain Dept. from proceeding any Read More... |
2019 PTD 903 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
AZEE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED. VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C, 177 & 120 Civil Procedure Code 1908 Rr. 1 & 2 | Audit within itself is not an adverse action, says Honurable Court |
Selection and conduct of audit by Dept. under ITO, 2001----Nature and scope----Audit within itself is not an adverse action and or order, particularly in a system where tax return was to be filed by a taxpayer under Self-assessment and was to be treated as an Read More... |
2019 PTD 903 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
HAFIZ ABDUL KARIM VS C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 122 & 129 | Amendment of finalized assessment by Officer Inland Revenue |
Amendment of finalized assessment by Officer Inland Revenue---Number of Mistakes had been made been made by the Officer while amending the assessment----Commissioner (Appeals) also passed a non-speaking order and annulled the amended assessment with the direction of Read More... |
2019 PTD 982 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
HAFIZ ABDUL KARIM VS C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance | Administration of Justice |
If the basic order is void then any superstructure built thereon is also liable to Read More... |
2019 PTD 982. |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
HUM NETWORK LTD. THROUGH CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 233 & 21 | Collection of Advance Tax on Brokerage and Commission |
Deductions not allowed Advertising agency commission----Applicability of S.233(2) of the ITO, 2001---Application for interim injunction to stop operation of show-cause notice(s)----Scope----Taxpayer, which was a television channel, impugned show-cause notice whereby Read More... |
2019 PTD 987 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI VS MESSRS SITARA ENERGY LTD |
Interpretation of statutes | Ramedial and curative legislation |
Ramedial and curative legislation----Retrospective effect---Principles--Such legislation has retrospective effect---Beneficial executive orders/notifications have retrospective Read More... |
2019 PTD 1024 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
WISAL KAMAL FABRICS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 18(1)(d), 122(5A) & 133 | Tax liability, determination of-Interest free loans by directors of company |
Interest free loans by directors of company-Nature- Taxpayer was receiving interest free loans extended by its directors which was declared as taxpayer's benefits by tax authorities---Taxpayer's appeal before Appellate Tribunal IR was dismissed ex-parte-Indeed--No Read More... |
2019 PTD 1077 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS GLOBAL HEALTH SERVICES (PUBLIC) LTD., ISLAMABAD VS THE C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 161, 131 & 205 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4) | Charge of withholding tax on the gross amounts of expenses claimed under various heads |
Charge of withholding tax on the gross amounts of expenses claimed under various heads, without examining the record---Appeal had been filed against order of Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) passed under Ss.161/205 of ITO, 2001; whereby Assessing Officer's Read More... |
2019 PTD 1081 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/S NIT INCOME FUND, KARACHI VS The C.I.R., ZONE-I, C.R.T.O., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122, 129, 150 & Second Sched., Part-I Clause-99 | Re-investment of profit/ issuance of Dividends |
National Investment Trust Limited was aggrieved of order passed by authorities rejecting claim of exemption though taxpayer had not issued any bonus units--- Indeed- Taxpayer issued dividends to shareholders and amongst them some shareholders purchased new shares by Read More... |
2019 PTD 1100 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
M/s LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 140 & 170 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Notice of recovery of tax---Persons holding money on behalf of taxpayer |
Persons holding money on behalf of taxpayer---Refunds--Appellant assailed notice of recovery of tax sued by income tax authorities on the ground that its refund claim for larger amount was pending undetermined with the dept. and it was appropriate to adjust the said Read More... |
2019 PTD 1116 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/s. MUSLIM TRADERS, CHAKWAL VS The C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 2(68), 74, 161, 205 & 221 | Tax year |
Demand orders in piecemeal in respect of a tax year and passing of orders before completion of the tax year---Original proceedings for demand for the tax year 2014 comprising the period from July, 2013 to November 2013 were finalized under Ss. 161/205 of the ITO, Read More... |
2019 PTD 1118 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
KHURRAM SHAHZAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 175 | Power to enter and search premises |
Commissioner could authorize entry and search of the premises of a taxpayer in order to enforce any provision of the ITO, 2001 (‘the Ordinance’) i.e. that there must be an infringement or non-compliance of some provision of the Ordinance which the tax Read More... |
2019 PTD 1124 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
KHURRAM SHAHZAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 175 | Power to enter and search premises/CIR to justify |
Seizure of record computer and accounts of a business---No compelling reasons provided for initiating seizure proceedings---Tax dept. on the basis of an authorization order issued under S. 175 of the ITO, 2001 (‘the Ordinance’) by the commissioner Read More... |
2019 PTD 1124 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 148 & 154 | Nature of minimum /Double taxation |
Final tax under S. 154 of ITO Ord.2001 as an imposition independent from imposition under S, 148 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Nature---Imported goods, if subsequently exported, were subject to imposition of income tax at two stages/twice---Scope----Question before Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. Ss. 122, 120 & 170 | Assessment/Order deemed to be passed by Commissioner under S. 120 of the ITO Ord.2001 /Amendment of assessment |
Nature of power of Commissioner to amend assessment order under S. 122(5A) of the ITO Ord.2001 , as distinct from power of adjudication of refund claims under S. 170 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Scope----Question before the High Court was whether Commissioner had Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of statutes | statutory provision |
Any statutory provision which conferred jurisdiction could not be made redundant on mere assumptions or implications. Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s BESTWAY CEMENT (PVT.) LTD, ISLAMABAD VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss. 161, 174(3), 205 | Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Declaring an assessee in default/Limitation |
Department took action against appellant taxpayer under Ss.161/205 of the ITO Ord.2001 for his failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Taxpayer challenged such action relaying upon the time limitation given in S.174(3) of the ITO Ord.2001. |
2018 PTD 602 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore VS CIR, LTU , Lahore |
provision of law | provision of law |
Every provision of law had to be interpreted so as to make the law workable and no redundancy could be attached or attributed to the provision or the legislative Read More... |
2018 PTD 739 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
PAKISTAN STATE OIL LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 80C | Tax could be levied up to, or below, the total income/100 percent/confiscation of the property |
Presumptive tax/deemed income tax---Oil products imported by the Federal Government through Pakistan State Oil (“PSO”) as its Handling Agent---Commission on handling charges was paid to PSO for the assessment year in question and Read More... |
2018 PTD 1306 (2018) 118 TAX 247 2018 PTCL 783 2018 SCMR 894 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
Sadia Jabbar
VS Federation of Pakistan and others |
Customs Act 1979 S. 25 & 30 | Customs value of goods/World Trade Organization Agreement |
Section 25 of Customs Act, 1969, embodied World trade Organization Agreement and was one of the most important provisions of the Act, which laid down the general manner in which the customs value of imported goods was to be determined---Proper determination of the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1746 2014 PTCL 537 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
Sadia Jabbar
VS Federation of Pakistan and others |
Interpretation of statutes | statutory provision / Pakistan’s treaty obligations |
Statute or statutory provision which embodied World Trade Organization Agreement---If two interpretation of such a provision, were possible, the one consistent with International Law or Pakistan’s treaty obligations, would be preferred---If meaning of the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1746 2014 PTCL 537 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
Sadia Jabbar
VS Federation of Pakistan and others |
Interpretation of statutes | legislative intent, and if that intent was clear |
Amendments were usually intended to change the law----In special case, even if it was concluded that the amendment had changed the law, the amendment should, if at all possible, be interpreted and applied in a manner which would remain Read More... |
2018 PTD 1746 2014 PTCL 537 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
CIVIC CENTRES COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 19(1), 19(2)(a), 22(a), 22(b) & 22(c) Wealth Tax Act 1963, S. 2(1)(16) & 3 | Rental income/Income from business or profession/ Income from house property |
Properties belonging to two State owned entities were transferred to a private limited company (‘the appellant-company’) owned by the Federal Government on directions of the Prime Minister Secretariat---Subsequently, the Prime Read More... |
2018 PTD 1808 (2019) 119 TAX 180 2018 SCMR 1391 2018 PLJ 603 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s BESTWAY CEMENT (PVT.) LTD, ISLAMABAD VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 161, 174(3) & 205 | Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Declaring an assessee in default/Limitation |
Department took action against appellant taxpayer under Ss.161/205 of the ITO Ord.2001 for his failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Taxpayer challenged such action relaying upon the time limitation given in S.174(3) of the ITO Ord.2001. |
2018 PTD 602 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE-RTO VS DR. GHULAM RASOOL |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(1), 128(5) & 133(1) | admitting additional documents |
Taxation officer initiated proceedings against taxpayer, after finalization of assessment, and amended the assessment under S.122(1) OF ITO Ord.2001 --- Appellate Authority set aside additional tax by requisitioning wealth statement and said order was maintained by Read More... |
2018 PTD 612 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS GHULAM HABIB AND CO., PESHAWAR AND OTHERS VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 114, 115(4), 153(1)(c), 159, 169(b) & 170 | Filing of income tax returns/Tax collected or deducted as final tax/Refund claim |
Taxpayers, who were contractors falling under the purview of “Final Tax Regime (FTR)” by virtue of Ss.153(1)(c) & 169(b) of the ITO Ord.2001 were required to file statement under S.115(4) of the ITO Ord.2001 ; which they did so, but later on they Read More... |
2018 PTD 616 (2018)118 TAX 43 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LTD. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 170 & 127 | Constitutional petition before the High Court against rejection of refund applications |
Constitutional petition before the High Court against rejection of application for issuance of refunds ---Maintainability---Alternate remedy available in the statute---Impugned order rejecting application of petitioner-company for issuance of refunds was passed Read More... |
2018 PTD 654 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS BP PAKISTAN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC,
KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 | Delay in filing appeal/Condonation/ Delay of 72 days |
Delay of 72 days in filing appeal had been sought to be condoned contending that said delay was neither deliberate not intentional, but due to transfer of record and employees, the papers were inadvertently missed and did not reach the principal officer of the Read More... |
2018 PTD 691 |
|
Supreme Court (AJ&K) | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND
KASHMIR COUNCIL, MIRPUR
VS MOHAMMAD NASEER QURESHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.206 & Second Sched. Pt. III, Cl.1(2) Finance Act (III of 2006), Preamble---Finance Act (XXII of 2013), Second Sched. Pt. I, Cl.58-A FBR Circular No.6 of 2013 dated 19-07-2013--- | Teachers performing administrative jobs/Payment of tax on income from salary |
Teachers performing administrative jobs---Payment of tax on income from salary---Term ‘full time teacher’---Scope---FBR issued Circular No.6 of 2013 dated 19-07-2013 dated 19-07-2013 whereby tax liability on income from salary equivalent to 75% had been Read More... |
2018 PTD 693 (2018)118 TAX 483 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
FAUJI FERTILIZER COMPANY LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 147 & 205 | Advance tax paid in quarterly installments |
Notices issued to petitioner-company seeking proof of basis for estimation of advance tax paid in installments---Legality---Perusal of S.147 of the ITO Ord.2001 led to the conclusion that once estimate (of advance tax) was filed by the tax payer whether right or Read More... |
2018 PTD 719 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore VS CIR, LTU , Lahore |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), | Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay. |
Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), pending appeal, had denied stay against recovery of tax. |
2018 PTD 739 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore VS CIR, LTU , Lahore |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), | Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal, seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand |
Appeal with application to Appellate Tribunal seeking grant of stay against recovery of tax demand---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), pending appeal, had denied stay against recovery of tax, |
2018 PTD 739 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/s. Azgard Nine Limited, Lahore VS CIR, LTU , Lahore |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 131(5), | Appeal with application before Appellate Tribunal/ seeking grant of stay |
Grant of stay against recovery of tax demand by Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Section 132 of the ITO Ord.2001 , provided that there were two types of appeals; one which related to the assessment order and the other related to decision other than Read More... |
2018 PTD 739 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS M/S. SIKA PAINT INDUSTRIES |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.122(4)(5) & 133(1) | Definite information/ Amendment of assessment |
Assessing officer amended assessment on the basis of material recovered as a result of raid conducted on the premises of assessee---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue set aside the order passed by authorities on the ground that there was no definite information Read More... |
2018 PTD 749 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Minimum Tax |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Minimum Tax |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Final Tax Regime |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Double Taxation |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer is subject to the payment of income tax under Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Refund |
From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Amendment of Assessment |
From the plain reading of section 170 of the Ordinance, it is evident that the claim for refund has different para-meters and yardsticks. As stated above, Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Power of Commissioner and Delegates |
In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Amendment of Assessment |
In other words, a complete tax return upon its filing becomes assessment order of the Commissioner Inland Revenue. Under the present dispensation, mere filing Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SOHAIL VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH ACCOUNTANT VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (AUDIT), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(19)(e), 114(2), 120, 120(1), 122, 122(5), 122(5A), 148, 148(6), 148(8), 154, 154(4), 170, 209, 210, 211 | Independent Incidence |
The close perusal of section 148(8) of the Ordinance would unfold the situation as that Tax paid at the import stage is a minimum amount of tax and the importer Read More... |
2018 PTD 2181 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MUHAMMAD ASIF and others VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 12, 148 & Second Schedule, Part-I Notification No. FD(SOSR-II) 8-43/2010 dated 27-07-2010 | deduction of income tax on special judicial allowance |
Petitioner were judicial officers and were aggrieved of deduction of income tax on special judicial allowance---Plea raised by authorities was that judicial allowance was not covered under Item-39, Part-II of Second Schedule of ITO Ord.2001. |
2018 PTD 806 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Interpretation of statutes | Amendment in law |
Amendment in law---Effect---Where any statutory law is changed there is a presumption that it affects change is legal rights to the extent provided by such amendment---Amending provisions have to be read along with un-amended provision s as they are part of the same Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)] | Audit/Power of Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue |
Power of Commissioner under S.177, ITO Ord.2001 is independent and exercisable subject in a different set of conditions on basis of record before him as compare to powers available to FBR in terms of S.214-C of ITO Ord.2001 which are not record based, Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 114(2)(b), 120(1), 122, 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- | Selection of taxpayer for audit |
Mere selection of taxpayer for audit and calling of books of accounts to verify version declared in his return under USAS, which is main theme on which entire structure of ITO Ord.2001 has been built does not cause any injury/prejudice to Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Interpretation of Constitution & Interpretation of statutes | Wisdom of legislature/Judicial restraint/ Retrospective effect |
Judicial restraint needs to be exercised in questioning wisdom of legislature in enacting a law or an amendment therein subject to caveat that it has been made competently and without in any manner transgressing limitations imposed by Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- | Notice of audit/Non-mentioning of reasons |
Petitioners were taxpayers and they were aggrieved of notices issued under S.177 of ITO Ord.2001 by Commissioner to conduct their audits---Plea raised by taxpayers was that no reasons had been assigned in notices for selection of their cases for Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010) | Audit/ Selection of case by Commissioner |
Selection of case by Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue---Procedure---Taxpayer receiving notice from Commissioner calling for his record for purpose of audit and at same time being selected by FBR for computerized, random or parametric balloting, only one Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
KOHINOOR SUGAR MILLS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) ---Ss. 177 & 214-C [inserted through Finance Act (XVI of 2010)]--- | Audit |
Provisions relating to audit are germane to assessment of taxable income of assessee and are machinery provisions which should be construed in a manner which makes the machinery procedure workable---Audit provisions being machinery provisions, should be liberally Read More... |
2018 PTD 821 (2018)118 TAX 393 2018 PTCL 98 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, WHT, ZONE, RTO-II, KARACHI VS M/S. TIANSHI INTERNATIONAL PAKISTAN CO. (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 133, 161 & 205 Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 34 | Authorities were aggrieved of deleting default surcharge |
Default surcharge---Authorities were aggrieved of deleting default surcharge under Ss.161 & 205 of ITO Ord.2001 , by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue. |
2018 PTD 900 2018 PTD 900 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
M/S BESTWAY CEMENT LIMITED VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5-A) & 122(9) | Amendment in procedure/Retrospective effect |
Petitioner company was taxpayer and aggrieved of notices issued by authorities seeking information and record with regard to assessment orders passed in previous years. |
2018 PTD 977 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SUKKUR VS M/S. NABI BUX GOLD SMITH, UBARO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122(3) (5-A) & 177 | Amendment of assessment/Taxpayer, a goldsmith |
Taxpayer, a goldsmith, filed return of income for tax year 2006 which was revised as a result of proceedings conducted under S.177 of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue/ Adjudicating Authority amended the assessment enhancing the amount of Read More... |
2018 PTD 991 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ISLAMABAD
VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (AUDIT-I), ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 11(1)(c)(d), 53, 54, 122 & 133 Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act (XXIV of 1948), Ss.2 & 3-B--- | Working Interest, sale of---Taxable income |
Applicant was a foreign company engaged in petroleum exploration in Pakistan, who sold its entire share of Working Interest to another company-Authorities issued notice of recovery tax on consideration amount received by applicant in such transaction--- Plea raised Read More... |
2018 PTD 996 (2019)119 TAX 333 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ISLAMABAD
VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (AUDIT-I), ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Enactment or repeal of law/----Fiscal statute |
Authority---Legislature has the exclusive domain to make laws or to repeal, amend and revise existing statutory enactments---Repeal of an existing law may be amended through express intendment or it may be implied from statute enacted later in time and which contain Read More... |
2018 PTD 996 (2019)119 TAX 333 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
THAHEEM RICE MILLS, SHIKARPUR VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AUDIT ZONE-II, R.T.O., SUKKUR |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122(2)(5-A) | Amendment of assessment order-Limitation---Assessment order, could be amended within five years |
Amendment of assessment order-Limitation---Assessment order, could be amended within five years after its issuance, as provided under S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001 ---Assessment order, in the present case, was amended after four months and twenty one days of its Read More... |
2018 PTD 1027 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
C.I.R., R.T.O., ABBOTABAD VS SHAHID MEHMOOD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 177 & 214-C | Audit Selection/ Powers of Commissioner-IR and FBR |
Case of taxpayer was selected for audit by Commissioner Inland Revenue, and for non-compliance of notices by the taxpayer, ex parte order was passed---Commissioner-IR (Appeals), annulled assessment on the ground that Commissioner-IR was not empowered to select cases Read More... |
2018 PTD 1054 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUNNY JEWELERS, RAWALPINDI VS C.I.R., R.T.O., RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 113 B, 114, 120, 122(1)(5-A) & 177 | Taxation of income of retailers/Audit |
Selection of case for audit---Amendment of assessment---Case of taxpayer was selected for audit under S.177 of ITO Ord.2001 ---Taxpayer contented that his return of income filed under S.113B of ITO Ord.2001 could not be amended under S.122 of Said Read More... |
2018 PTD 1062 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 17(1)(a) | Expression "Receivable" |
|
2018 PTD 1089 2018 PTCL 832 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing/fiscal statute/ No Intendment/ No presumption |
Taxing/fiscal statute--Intendment---Court, in case of taxing statute has to look to clear words since there is no question of any intendment---No presumption or equity about tax--Nothing can be read or implied in taxing statute--Statute has to be read as a whole in Read More... |
2018 PTD 1089 2018 PTCL 832 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 2(12), 33, 34, & 80(1)(b)--- | Banking company/Status Accounting on cash/accrual basis |
Banking company-Status Accounting on cash/accrual basis-Scope-Each individual Bank is a company within meaning of expression 'company' under S.2(12) read with S.80(1)(b) of ITO Ord.2001 ---Mandatory for Banks to account for chargeability to tax under head 'income Read More... |
2018 PTD 1089 2018 PTCL 832 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed]-- S. 17(1), 23(1)(x), 24(1) & 32 Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 18(2), 32, 33, 34 & 100-A-Public Debt Act 1944 S. 28 | Interest on securities/Charging of tax/charging of tax from Banking companies on securities |
Dispute was with regard to charging of tax from Banking companies on securities offered by Federal Government under Public Debt Act, 1944. |
2018 PTD 1089 2018 PTCL 832 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 113, 122(5-A), 153(1)(b) & 221, Second Sched., Part III, Cl.(8) | Minimum/turnover tax, charge of/Amendment of assessment/Deduction of withholding tax |
Taxpayer, a dealer of petroleum products, contended that his product fell within the category of "Fast Moving Consumers Goods", whereupon minimum tax under S.113 of the ITO Ord.2001 as per Cl.(8) Part III, Second Sched. to the Ordinance, was 0.20%---Contention of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1115 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 53(2) General Clauses Act 1897 S.5--- | Notification or enactment involving public money |
Prospective or retrospective operation of---Scope---Such notification or enactment could not be extended retrospectively, even if those were beneficial to the taxpayer.. Such retrospective application was fraught with risk to the Revenue and could play havoc with Read More... |
2018 PTD 1115 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
SHAUKAT ALI, PROP. SHAUKAT OIL TRADERS, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 113, 122(5-A), 153(1)(b) & 221, Second Sched., Part III, CL.(8)-S.R.O. No.57(1)/2012, dated 24-11-2012--- | Minimum/turnover tax, charge of/Amendment of assessment/Deduction of withholding tax |
Question in the present case, revolved around the claim of the taxpayer, which was two-fold, firstly, being a dealer of petroleum products he was entitled to claim 80% relief by treating the petroleum product as "Fast Moving Consumers Goods (FMCG) as per Cl.(8) of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1115 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT,
KARACHI VS INTERNATIONAL POWER GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 23(xviii) | Income from business/ Expenditure incurred for setting up a sports and recreational facility for employees |
Expenditure incurred for setting up a sports and recreational facility for employees---Respondent-company derived its income by rendering operational and maintenance service to a power production company---In the subject assessment year the respondent incurred an Read More... |
2018 PTD 1128 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV VS MESSRS HAZARA EFFICIENT GAS, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 2(29-C) & 153(7)(iv)(a)(b) | Status of industrial undertaking/ Determination |
Respondent/company claimed to be ‘industrial undertaking’, but Additional Commissioner-IR (Appeals) passed detail order holding that company was an industrial undertaking meeting all requirements of S.2(29-C) of the ITO Ord.2001 and that company Read More... |
2018 PTD 1188 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV VS OCCIDENTAL OIL AND GAS PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 60-A, 114 & 122(1) Worker’s Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971), Ss.2 & 4--- | Worker"s Welfare Fund chargeable on declared income |
Taxation Officer charged workers welfare fund on the amended income instead of declared income; whereas subsection (1) of S.2 of Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, as amended in 2006, emphasized that workers welfare fund was chargeable on declared income as per Read More... |
2018 PTD 1199 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS VS HAZRAT HUSSAIN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 148(1) & 148(5) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 247(3)---Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (“PATAâ€) | PATA/exemption |
Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (“PATA”)---Advance income tax on import or raw material/machinery meant for “PATA”---Non-applicability of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Constitution itself granted complete immunity for, and in relation to Read More... |
2018 PTD 1204 (2018)118 TAX 260 2018 PTD 1204 2018 SCMR 939 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS VS HAZRAT HUSSAIN AND OTHERS |
ITO Ord.2001 | Appeal |
Appeals should not be filed as a matter of routine or because a decision has been rendered against the (Government) department---Decisions should be taken on a reasonable basis and it was not advisable for government departments to waste public time and money by Read More... |
2018 PTD 1204 (2018)118 TAX 260 2018 PTD 1204 2018 SCMR 939 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MIRPUR
VS SHAKEEL AHMED AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133 | Question of law |
According to the statutory provisions of section 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the High Court has to decide the questions of law raised in the reference. In our considered view, it was enjoined upon the High Court to attend all the questions of law and Read More... |
2018 PTD 2228 (2019)119 TAX 257 2019 PTCL 263 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V. VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 100, 122(5-A) & 129, Fifth Schedule, Part 1, Rr.1 & 2 | Business of production and exploration of petroleum/ Claim of expenses |
Claim of expenses of one Petroleum Concession Agreement (P.C.A.) against the income from the other---Concept of 'ring fencing' and 'one basket'--- Amendment of assessment---Taxpayers, who were engaged in business of production and exploration of Petroleum, had Read More... |
2018 PTD 1344 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V. VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 32(2) | Method of accounting/ cash method and accrual method |
Two principal methods of keeping track of a business's income and expenses were "cash method" and "accrual method"--Said methods differ only in the timing- ITO Ord.2001 , had provided that income of a person chargeable to tax was computed in accordance with the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1344 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V. VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 6 & 152 | Payments to non-residents/Deduction of tax/ Additions |
Company (tax-payer) was not provided with the adequate opportunity to provide the required details---Tax-payer company had provided all required data, showing that the company had released all the payments of Technical Assistance Fee after the proper deduction of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1344 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO. B.V. VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Fifth Schedule, Part-1, R.3 | Royalty/ Expenditure incurred on account of royalty/Deduction |
Assessing Officer made addition in tax on account of "depletion allowance". While making the impugned addition, the Assessing Officer observed that for the purpose of computing depletion allowance under R.3 of Part I of Fifth Schedule to the ITO Ord.2001 the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1344 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. AL-RAHEEM TEXTILE PROCESSING, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., LYALLPUR ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122(5-A) | Amendment of assessment |
Re-assessment proceedings taken place on presumption basis confronting wrong facts to re-open the assessment tantamount to fishing enquiry---First show-cause notice issued to the taxpayer was defective as neither the assessment was erroneous nor prejudicial to the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1406 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. AL-RAHEEM TEXTILE PROCESSING, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., LYALLPUR ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.111(1)(b) Investment Tax Scheme, 2008---C.B.R. Circular No.3 of 2008 dated 1-7-2008 | Investment in business/Declaration of business assets |
Appellant/taxpayer, was an “Association of Persons” (AoP)---Both members of ‘AoP’ made investment in business and declared their business assets in wealth statements and explained the origin of sources of cash investment made in the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1406 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT AND OTHERS VS MESSRS ALLAH DIN STEEL AND ROLLING MILLS AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 214C Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 72B Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 42B Audit Policy, 2015 | Random ballot for selection of taxpayers for audit/Non-framing of rules for selecting taxpayers for audit |
Question as to whether there was any discrimination or arbitrariness in the process of selection for audit in the absence of specific rules, and whether a timeframe should be placed for purpose of completing of audit for a tax year; held, that mere selection for Read More... |
2018 PTD 1444 (2019)119 TAX 27 2018 PTCL 678 2018 SCMR 1328 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AUDIT RANGE, ZONE-I AND OTHERS
VS M/S EDEN BUILDERS LIMITED AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122(2) [as amended by Finance Act (I of 2009) | Amendment made in S.122(2) |
Amendment made in S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001 through Finance Act, 2009 dated 30-06-2009 was not retrospective in effect---Taxpayers who filed their tax returns before S.122(2) of the ITO Ord.2001 was amended through the Finance Act, 2009 dates Read More... |
2018 PTD 1474 (2018)117 TAX 509 2018 PTCL 661 2018 SCMR 991 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS SALEEM FLOUR MILLS, USTA MUHAMMAD, BALOCHISTAN VS C.I.R. (WHT), R.T.O., QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX 2001) Ss. 137(2), 140, 153, 161, 205 & 221 | Failure to make deduction of withholding tax---Appellant/taxpayer |
Failure to make deduction of withholding tax---Appellant/taxpayer, who was an Association of Persons (AOP), was required to deduct tax under S.153(1) of the ITO Ord.2001 , in respect of payment made on account of purchases made, services acquired and contract Read More... |
2018 PTD 1480 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX
OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS MEDIMAKERS PHARMACEUTICAL (AOP), HYDERABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 4, 114, 120, 122, 137, 138, 161 & 205 | Failure to pay tax collected or deducted/Liability to pay additional tax |
Assistant Commissioner-IR (ACIR), after examination of return of income filed by the taxpayer, observed that taxpayer had made purchases for relevant period at Rs.114,968,668 and taxpayer who was liable to deduct tax on such purchases had failed to deduct the same; Read More... |
2018 PTD 1533 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS HAIER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 133, 2(22A), & Second Sched., Part-III, CI. 8 | consumer goods/ Reduction in tax liability |
Meaning of the words “consumer goods” for purpose of benefit of reduction in tax liability---Question before the High Court was whether household electronic goods could be treated as consumed goods for the purpose of Clause 8 of Part III of the Second Read More... |
2018 PTD 1582 (2018)118 TAX 332 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS HAIER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Interpretation of statutes | Canons of Construction-/rinciples of “ejusdem generis†and “expressio unjus est exclusio alteriusâ€. application of |
Meaning of ejusdem generis was ‘of the same kind or class’ and it was a canon of construction applied when a general word or phrase followed a list of specifics, then such general word or phrase would be interpreted to include only items of the same type Read More... |
2018 PTD 1582 (2018)118 TAX 332 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
M/S NIT INCOME FUND, KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 2(63)(64), 4-B, 9, 53-A, Sched. II Part-I, Cl.(99) | Super Tax/Exemption from/Taxation Officer vide ex parte order charged Super Tax |
Taxation Officer vide ex parte order charged Super Tax on income of taxpayer, which was a Public Limited Mutual Fund (Collective Investment Schemes)---Such order of Taxation Officer having been confirmed by Commissioner (Appeal); taxpayer challenged said order Read More... |
2018 PTD 1723 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS Z & J HYGIENIC PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD., KAMOOKI VS THE CIR, RTO GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 53, 153, 161, 205 & Second Schedule, Part-IV, Cl.45-A Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 | Deduction of short paid income tax/Failure to pay tax collected or deducted |
Department, had itself rendered in order-in-original, that the taxpayer being a manufacturer was subjected to zero rating of sale tax through various notifications---Taxpayer, in circumstances, had correctly deducted withholding tax on reduced rates applicable on Read More... |
2018 PTD 1817 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
BP PAKISTAN AND PRODUCTION INC. KARACHI VS THE CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 60-A, 120, 122(1) & 221 | Amendment of assessment/Rectification of mistake |
Contention of taxpayer was that Commissioner-IR (Appeals) had erred in maintaining the action of Additional Commissioner-IR in calculating “depletion allowance”---Taxpayer also sough consequential relief in the liability of Worker Welfare Read More... |
2018 PTD 1913 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CBR HOUSE, ISLAMABAD VS MUHAMMAD JUNAID TALAT |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S. 19 Reward Order dated 14-5-1974 | “Definite information†with regard to tax evasion/ Payment of ‘reward’ to informant |
Respondent was the author of an article published in a daily newspaper wherein he mentioned issue of non-payment of income tax by seafarers of Pakistan discharging duty on foreign flagships---Pursuant to such article the income tax department raised a demand against Read More... |
2018 PTD 1933 (2019)119 TAX 196 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
TREET CORPORATION LTD.
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS W.P. NO. 11253 OF 2017, DECIDED ON 21ST MARCH, 2018. |
ITO Ord.2001 Ss. 214C & 117 Sales Tax Act, 1990, S. 72B. Federal Excise Act, 2005, S. 42B. FBR Taxpayers’ Audit Policy, 2016 | Audit of taxpayers. Random parametric selection of taxpayers for audit |
Audit of taxpayers. Random parametric selection of taxpayers for audit. Parameters for computer balloting be clearly defined. Petitioner (taxpayer) impugned notices for selection for audit under Department’s Taxpayers’ Audit Policy, 2016, on the ground Read More... |
2018 PTD 1942 2018 PTCL 596 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
FARRUKH SHAHZAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL) RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 37(1)(A). | Capital gains tax on sale of immovable property. |
Zero percent capital gains tax. Contention of taxpayer/petitioner that by virtue of S. 37(1)(A) of the ITO Ord.2001 the petitioner was not liable to pay capital gains tax as the subject property was purchased in the year 2008 and sold in the year Read More... |
2018 PTD 2009 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
FARRUKH SHAHZAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL) RTO, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 18 & 111(1) (b). | Amendment of assessment by addition to accumulative wealth of tax payer. |
Contention of tax-payer/petitioner that by virtue of S. 111(1)(b) of the ITO Ord.2001 there was no justification for adding Rs. 60 million in the accumulative wealth of the petitioner for the year 2013; that S. 111(2) of the Ordinance only permitted inclusion Read More... |
2018 PTD 2009 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS UNITED FINISHING MILL, NANKANA SAHIB VS THE C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 177, 120 & 122(1)(5). | Assessment. Amendment of assessment. Selection of case for audit |
Per Nazir Ahmad, Judicial Member; Javed Iqbal, Chairman agreeing; Abdul Nasir Butt, Accountant Member, disagreeing on the issue of “selection of cases for Audit under S. 177, ITO Ord.2001 ” [Majority View]-Assessment. Amendment of Read More... |
2018 PTD 2096 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS UNITED FINISHING MILL, NANKANA SAHIB VS THE C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.111 | Addition made on account of short term loan obtained from Bank |
Question for determination: When appeal had earlier been decided by the Tribunal only on the legal plane, Tribunal could not again lay its hands to other grounds of appeal which were not opted to again lay its hands to other grounds of appeal which were not opted to Read More... |
2018 PTD 2096 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS R.I. STEEL HATTAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., ABBOTABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.131 | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Procedure. |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal. Procedure. Law laid down by Division Bench (D.B.) of the Tribunal. Binding force. Scope Law laid down by Division Bench of Appellate Tribunal on a given issue, was binding on Division Bench of the Tribunal. If Division Bench of the Read More... |
2018 PTD 2114 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
NAUMAN MAHMOOD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS-III), ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 2(9), 120, 122(5A) & 130(8) | Income from real estate |
Income from real estate--- One time transaction---Assesse was a chartered accountant and Assessing Officer issued show cause notice to him alleging that he was engaged in business of sale and purchase of immovable properties---Validity---Revenue’s treatment of Read More... |
2017 PTD 465 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
AMRELI STEELS LTD., KARACHI VS The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, L.T.U., Karachi |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(1), 122(5A), 205 | Amendment of assessment; audited accounts |
Default surcharge, levy of---Amendment of assessment---On examination of return of income and audited accounts, department observed that the taxpayer had not paid workers’ welfare fund along with return of income, which was payable at 2% of accounting Read More... |
2016 PTD 2099 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
AMRELI STEELS LTD., KARACHI VS The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Zone-I, L.T.U., Karachi |
Interpretation of statutes | Revenue/fiscal laws |
Revenue/fiscal laws---Scope---Revenue/fiscal laws were not in the nature of penal laws, and the deterrent provisions, were neither charging nor revenue generating provision---Taxation laws, were substantially remedial in their character, and were intended to prevent Read More... |
2016 PTD 2099 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
QAISER PERVAIZ VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 122(1)(5) &177(4) | Filing of Income tax return Selection f case for audit |
Filing of income tax return---Selection of case for audit---Amendment of assessment---Case of taxpayer was selected for audit under S.177(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Assessing Officer, while passing ex parte order made additions in trading account regarding Read More... |
2017 PTD 506 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS MESSRS DEW AN SUGAR MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 221 | rectification |
Rectification of order of Tribunal---Department had sought rectification in the order of Appellate Tribunal which was fairly elaborate and speaking reasoned order taking into account the relevant provisions of law and facts of the case and no grievance was left Read More... |
2017 PTD 547 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS MESSRS DEW AN SUGAR MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 221 | Rectify its order |
Powers of Tribunal to rectify its order---Scope, application and object of S.221, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Tribunal had no power to correct error of judgment and review of its own order, because the “error of judgment” was not synonymous of “mistake in Read More... |
2017 PTD 547 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS MESSRS DEW AN SUGAR MILLS LTD. |
Civil Procedure Code of 1908--- S.11 | Principle of res judicata |
Res judicata, principle of---Object and scope---Principle of res judicata, was of universal application, as it was based on two age old principles; “interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium”, which would mean that it was in the interest of the State that Read More... |
2017 PTD 547 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S SARWAR & COMPANY
VS THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND (PVT.) LIMITED, REVENUE ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 18(1)(a), 122, 133, 153(1)(c), 169 & Second Schedule, Part-I | Exemption from tax |
Reference---Exemption from tax---Final Tax Regime---Taxpayers were aggrieved of notices issued under S. 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, specifying that they were not entitled to concession for being taxed under Final Tax Regime---Validity---For taxation under Read More... |
2017 PTD 558 2016 PCTLR 921 2017 PLJ 134 2016 LHC 2808 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S SARWAR & COMPANY
VS THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND (PVT.) LIMITED, REVENUE ETC |
Interpretation of statutes | Exemption clause |
Fiscal statute---Exemption clause---Scope---While interpreting an exemption clause, plain language is to be considered and implications are not allowed---Conditions stipulated in exemption clause must be fulfilled---In case of any doubt or two possible Read More... |
2017 PTD 558 2016 PCTLR 921 2017 PLJ 134 2016 LHC 2808 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
M/S PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), LTU, ISLAMABAD ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 133 | Question of law |
Reference before the High Court---Maintainability---‘Question of law’---Scope---Reference before High Court under S.133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (“the Ordinance”) would lie on a question of law only---When a reference filed before the High Court Read More... |
2017 PTD 1372 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
M/S PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), LTU, ISLAMABAD ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 20, 21(c), 153(1)(b), 161, 162 & 233(2), [as existed for the tax years 2009 to 2013] | Television license fee |
Deductions not allowed in computing income---Scope---‘Television license fee’ was collected from consumers through their electricity bills by Electricity Distribution and Supply Companies (“the Distribution companies”) on behalf of Pakistan Television Read More... |
2017 PTD 1372 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
M/S PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), LTU, ISLAMABAD ETC. |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal statute/ Redundancy |
----‘Fiscal statute’---Fiscal statute, particularly the provisions creating a tax liability, must be interpreted strictly and any doubt arising therefrom must be resolved in favour of the taxpayer. ---Statute was the edict of the legislature and the Read More... |
2017 PTD 1372 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS CRESCENT CARRIERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.177---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S.3---Limitation Act (IX of 1908) S.12 & Arts. 151 | Condonation of delay |
Intra-court appeal---Limitation---Condonation of delay--- Grounds--- Scope--- Audit--- Appellant Commissioner Inland Revenue, sought condonation of delay of 37 days in filing of intra-court appeal, on the ground, inter alia, that the procedural constraints Read More... |
2017 PTD 1387 118 TAX 12 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2017 |
MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL VS The SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 161, 205 & 153 | Maladministration |
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Ss. 9, 2(3) & 10---Federal Tax Ombudsman, jurisdiction of---Maladministration---Disposal of complaints---Scope---Complaint against initiation of proceedings under Ss.161 & 205 of Read More... |
2017 PTD 1405 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
ALI MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER VS FAIZULLAH AND ANOTHER |
Partnership Act 1932 S. 42 | Suit for dissolution of partnership |
Suit for dissolution of partnership, rendition of accounts and injunction---Partnership---Proof---Predecessor-in-interest of parties were partners in business and plaintiffs claimed that after death of their father they had become partner in the Read More... |
2017 PTD 1407 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI | 2017 |
Saqib Masood, FCA & Shabbir Veejlani, FCA[AR], VS Najeeb Ahmed [D.R], |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5-A), 127, 128 & 131 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.24-A | Amendment of Assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Taxpayer had challenged validity of order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue/Appellate Authority contending that it was bad in law and facts---Validity---No reason had been assigned by the Appellate Authority for the findings Read More... |
2017 PTD 1416 (2016)114 TAX 49 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI | 2017 |
Saqib Masood, FCA & Shabbir Veejlani, FCA[AR], VS Najeeb Ahmed [D.R], |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5-A), 127, 128 & 131 | Administration of Justice |
Appellate authority/judicial or quasi-judicial, including officials/administrative or taxing authorities, while dispensing justice and exercising judicial or quasi-judicial powers, were supposed to apply their mind to the cases and to determine after evaluating Read More... |
2017 PTD 1416 (2016)114 TAX 49 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU VS Messrs N.P. SPINNING MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.182(1), 137 & 133 | Offences and penalties |
Offences and penalties under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Penalty for failure to furnish a return or statement---“Tax payable” meaning of---Explanation regarding meaning of expression “tax payable”, inserted into S.182(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2017 PTD 1441 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 170 & 120 Establishment of the Office of FTO Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Ss. 9(2)(b), 2(3) & 10 | Complaint against issuance of income tax refund |
Complaint against non-issuance of income tax refund---Jurisdiction of the FTO in relation to cases of tax refund---Maladministration---Scope---Contention of the Department was that per S.9(2)(b) of the Establishment of the Office of FTO, 2000; the Federal Tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 1447 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS M/S. PAK SAUDI FERTILIZER LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed Second Sched. Pt. 1, Clause 170 [since repealed] | Interest income |
National Funds Bonds---Interest income---Exemption from tax---Company had invested in National Funds Bonds---Interest income on such bonds was exempt under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Company had also borrowed loans from international borrowers and foreign Read More... |
2017 PTD 1514 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), LTU, ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS GEOFIZYKA KRAKOW PAKISTAN LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed] Ss. 24(i) & 163(4) | Convention; Avoidance of double taxation |
Convention between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Polish Peoples Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation of Income---Foreign company (resident of Poland)---Convention/Treaty for avoidance of double taxation had to be given preference and would Read More... |
2017 PTD 1526 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MUHAMMAD ILYAS QURESHI VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE etc |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 236A Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Interpretation | Advance tax time of sale by auction |
Scope---Advance tax at time of sale by auction---Retrospective application of enhancement of advance tax on past and closed auction transactions---Relevant tax year for assessment of such tax---Question before the High Court was whether enhancement in the rate of Read More... |
2017 PTD 1528 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MUHAMMAD ILYAS QURESHI VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE etc |
Interpretation of statutes | Statutory heading(s) and subheading(s) |
Statutory heading(s) and subheading(s)---Scope---Aids to interpretation---Headings prefixed to sections or entries could not control the plain words of the provision and could not also be referred to for purpose of construing provisions, when words used in the said Read More... |
2017 PTD 1528 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MUHAMMAD ILYAS QURESHI VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE etc |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxation/fiscal statues |
Taxation/fiscal statutes---Retrospective effect and interpretation of such statutes---Scope---Where a provision of law affected an accrued right of a taxpayer, said provision could not be applied retrospectively, unless the Legislature by express words or by Read More... |
2017 PTD 1528 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS M/S. GILANI TRANSPORT COMPANY |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed] Ss. 80-C(4) & 89 | Presumptive Tax Regime |
Presumptive Tax Regime---Charge of additional tax for failure to pay tax or penalty---Scope---Section 89 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 empowered the department to levy and recover additional tax only in case as assesse failed to pay the whole or any part of tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 1540 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS M/S. GILANI TRANSPORT COMPANY |
Interpretation of statues | Taxing statute |
Taxing statute---Charging provisions---Such provisions were to be strictly construed in favour of the subject so that if there was any substantial doubt, it to be resolved in favour of the Read More... |
2017 PTD 1540 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2017 |
FAUJI FERTILIZER COMPANY LIMITED EMPLOYEES GRATUITY FUND VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 53, 150, 151, 159 & Second Schedule, Part-IV, clause, 47-B | Advance income tax/ Trusts and Pension Funds |
Trusts and Pension Funds---Deduction of advance income tax---Exemption---Exemption certificate---Principles---Tax payers/petitioners were approved Gratuity/Provident Funds under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and their income was exempted from tax under clause 57(3) of Read More... |
2017 PTD 1544 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
HUSNAIN COTEX LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 153(1)(c), 153(3) & 169(b) | Normal tax regime; Final tax regime |
Taxpayers falling within domain of ‘normal tax regime’ and ‘final tax regime’---Distinction---Taxpayers who were covered under the ‘normal tax regime’, were those whose net profit a tax year was determined by matching costs with the income, after taking Read More... |
2017 PTD 1561 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
HUSNAIN COTEX LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. Ss. 53, 153(1)(c), 153(3), 169(b) & Second Sched. Pt. 1, Cl. 126F---Federal Board of Revenue, Circular No.14 of 2011 dated 6th October, 2011 | Normal tax regime; Final tax regime |
Income tax, exemption from---Tax relief granted to taxpayers of certain areas of the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (PATA) [“affected areas”], whose business suffered on Read More... |
2017 PTD 1561 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD. THROUGH SENIOR MANAGER (TAXATION) VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE (REVENUE DIVISION) AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.24, 97 & 122(5-A) | Goodwill/ Intangible assets |
“Goodwill”---Intangible assets---Administration of Banking companies---Taxpayer assailed show cause notice issued under S.122(5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Validity---Transferor Banking company was ‘generator/creator’ of goodwill and would have been Read More... |
2017 PTD 1585 125 TAX 75 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE FBR THROUGH COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S. ICI PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed] -Ss. 65, 66 & 66-A Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122(5A) | Amendment assessment; Limitation period |
Notice issued under S.122(5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for amendment assessment order---Limitation period---Notice purportedly issued by the Department under the provisions of S.122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was akin to the notice/proceedings which Read More... |
2017 PTD 1606 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. S.S.D. RICE MILLS, DAHARKI VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, AUDIT-II, UNIT, RTO, SUKKUR |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 113, 120 & 122(5-A) SRO No.571(I)/2012 dated 24-1-2012 | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Taxpayer filed return of income declaring Rs.710,000 on which tax was worked out as Rs.79,853---Scrutiny of return revealed that taxpayer had declared turnover of Rs.89,750,000 and its tax as per S.113 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 at 1% Read More... |
2017 PTD 1638 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI VS KHALID TEXTILE MILLS and others |
Taxation | Tax credit |
----‘Tax credit’---Meaning---Tax credit was an incentive or relief given to the taxpayer, usually for the purposes of promoting certain industries or activities. ----‘Tax credit’---Scope---Tax credit was an amount which was directly offset against or Read More... |
2017 PTD 1642 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI VS KHALID TEXTILE MILLS and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- ----Ss. 23(1)(v), 107 & Third Sched., R. 8(8)(b) | Tax credit for replacement |
Tax credit for replacement, balancing and modernization of machinery or plant---Scope---Depreciation allowance, computation of---Tax credit available under S. 107 of the erstwhile Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (the Ordinance)---Said tax credit was deduction albeit from Read More... |
2017 PTD 1642 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2017 |
M/S. M. SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. VS THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 170 & 120 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss. 10, 2(3) & 9 | Delay in issuance of refunds |
---Federal Tax Ombudsman, jurisdiction of---“Maladministration”---Disposal of complaints---Delay in issuance of refunds---Scope---Complaint against non-issuance of refund / compensation under S.170(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Contention of complainant Read More... |
2017 PTD 1651 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. DEWAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI VS THE ACIR-B, AUDIT-D-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 114, 120, 122(5-A), 129 & 131 | Power of appellate authority |
Powers of appellate authority---Scope---Return of income to be the assessment order---Amendment of assessment---Remand of case to Assessing Officer---Return of income filed by the taxpayer for relevant year, was treated as an assessment order, deemed to have been Read More... |
2017 PTD 1663 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
FANCY FOUNDATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- ----Ss. 2(11) & 136 | Question of fact and law |
Reference before High Court---Maintainability---Mixed question of fact and law---Question as to whether the sale/purchase of property constituted ‘business’ within the meaning of S.2(11) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and its effect on the taxpayer, involved Read More... |
2017 PTD 1687 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
FANCY FOUNDATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- ----Ss. 2(11) & 136 | Transaction by assesse |
Transaction by assesse---Question as to whether the transaction was an “adventure in the nature of the trade” amounting to business in terms of S.2(11) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---No hard and fast rule existed as to whether a transaction constituted an Read More... |
2017 PTD 1687 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
FANCY FOUNDATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- Ss. 2(11), 22 & 27(2)(a) | Adventure in the nature of the trade |
“Adventure in the nature of the trade” amounting to business in terms of S. 2(11) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Scope---Registered charitable trust---Profit made upon sale of property---Exemption from income tax---Burden of proof---Appellant, a registered Read More... |
2017 PTD 1687 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
FANCY FOUNDATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- Ss. 2(11), 22 & 27(2)(a) | Burden of proof |
Income---Scope---Receipts falling within the scope of ‘income’---Burden of proof---Burden to prove that an assesses’ receipts fell within the scope of ‘income’ and were liable to be taxed, laid on the department, and if the latter managed to establish the Read More... |
2017 PTD 1687 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(a) Taxation---- Final statutes---Fundamentals---Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes---Such statutes are necessarily a manifestation or exercise of a taxing power constitutionally vesting in appropriate Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS B.P. PAKISTAN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC VS THE CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S. 233 | Authorized representative |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rules, 2010, R.27---Adjournment---Appearance by authorized representative---No authorized representative appeared on behalf of appellant/taxpayer despite proper valid service of notice on various dates fixed for hearing---Some one Read More... |
2017 PTD 1725 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(d) Constitution of Pakistan--- Art. 268(1)---Term ‘existing laws’---Scope---Existing law had to be considered simply as a law in its own right and its pith and substance determined---If pith and substance was relatable to any entry on Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS B.P. PAKISTAN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INC VS THE CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S. 233 | Administration of Justice |
Thing required by law or by rule, was to be done in the manner prescribed by the law---If not done so, the entire structure built on the same would fall---Thing should be done according to law, or should not be done at Read More... |
2017 PTD 1725 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, RAWALPINDI VS MESSRS KHAN CNG FILLING STATION, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 120(IA), 121, 122(1)(5A), 176 & 177 | Amendment original deemed assessment order |
Amendment of original (deemed) assessment order---Scope---Powers of Commissioner to conduct audit of income tax return---Scope---When the Commissioner, Inland Revenue, invoked his powers in order to conduct audit or investigation of the income tax affairs of a Read More... |
2017 PTD 1731 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, RAWALPINDI VS MESSRS KHAN CNG FILLING STATION, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed] S. 65(2) | Difference between the two procedures stated |
Amendment of original (deemed) assessment order under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and the (repealed) Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Procedure---Comparison of the provision of S. 65(2) of the (repealed) Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and S. 122(5) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 1731 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, RAWALPINDI VS MESSRS KHAN CNG FILLING STATION, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5), 122(8) & 176(1)(a) | Definite information; Amendment assessment orders |
‘Definite information’ within the meaning of S. 122(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to justify amendments in the original assessment order---Scope---Processing ‘definite information’ through use of a scientific or mathematical formula to determine Read More... |
2017 PTD 1731 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(l) Constitution of Pakistan--- Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope—High Court judgment, specially in exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution, can operate at two levels: Firstly it operate in Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED (SNGPL) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) -Ss. 147, 120 & 122 | Advance Tax |
Advance tax under S.147 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Nature and concept---Advance tax as estimate to be made by taxpayer---Scope---Amount paid as advance tax was not the property of the Federal Government but remained vested in an assesse and was merely an Read More... |
2017 PTD 1774 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED (SNGPL) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) -Ss. 147, 120 & 122 | Advance Tax |
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Interpretation of S.147 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Concept, nature and scope of “Advance Tax” under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Demand of advance tax as tax due from taxpayer after Read More... |
2017 PTD 1774 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS BASF CHEMICAL AND POLYMERS PAKISTAN LTD VS TAXATION OFFICER, ACIT, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance Ss. 221, 131 & 133 | Rectification of order |
Rectification of order of Appellate Tribunal---Appeal, scope of---Rectification application had been filed by the applicant/taxpayer, seeking rectification of the order of the Tribunal---Said application had already been considered and conscious order had been Read More... |
2017 PTD 1785 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. ROYAL WEAVING FACTORY, PROP: UMAR IMTIAZ, SMALL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE VS C.I.R., R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 122(5) | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Return filed by the taxpayer for relevant year, was deemed assessment order under S.120(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Taxation Officer amended the assessment on information regarding import of machinery from Customs import data Read More... |
2017 PTD 1821 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S GHEE CORPORATION PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE VS DCIT, OFFICER, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed Ss. 80-D, 88, 54 & 136 | Charge of additional tax |
Reference to High Court – Minimum tax on income of certain persons---Charge of additional tax for failure to pay tax with the return---Payment of tax with return of income---Question before the High Court was whether tax under S.88 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2017 PTD 1824 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II VS SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING, COMPANY LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX OF 2001)--- ----S. 133 | Jurisdiction of High Court |
Reference to High Court---Jurisdiction of High Court under S. 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Maintainability / competence of reference where questions of law contained therein had already been decided by the Superior Courts---Scope---Scope of filing a Read More... |
2017 PTD 1832 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, SUKKUR VS Messrs RANIPUR CNG STATION, RANIPUR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 111, 120 & 133 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 24-A | Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Addition to income/assessment of taxpayer under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Show-cause notice to taxpayer for such addition was mandatory---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether for invocation of an addition Read More... |
2017 PTD 1839 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, SUKKUR VS Messrs RANIPUR CNG STATION, RANIPUR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 111, 120 & 133 | Natural justice principles |
Scope---Right to fair trial and right/opportunity of hearing, were cardinal principles of natural justice which had to be read into every statute even if the same were not specifically provided Read More... |
2017 PTD 1839 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
CHINA HARBOUR ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. THROUGH LIUCE VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 121, 124(4), 129, 132 & 137(2)---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Ss. 39, 42 & 54 | Best judgment assessment |
Suit for cancellation, declaration and permanent injunction---Best judgement assessment---Assessment giving effect to order---Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal---Due date payment of tax---Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) had been directed to decide Read More... |
2017 PTD 1852 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS BOC PAKISTAN LTD. VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (L.D) LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) --Ss. 29, 120, 122, 131 & 177 | Amendment of assessment; Bad debt/ Selection of case audit; |
Selection of case audit---Amendment of assessment---Bad debt---Case of the taxpayer was selected for audit and after completion of audit proceedings, assessment was amended---Taxpayer being aggrieved with amendment order filed appeal before appellate authority, Read More... |
2017 PTD 1865 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
F.M. TEXTILE MILLS & OTHERS VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS |
Interpretation of statues | Purposive approach |
“Purposive approach”---Concept and Scope---Purposive interpretation was based on the concept of purpose and purpose was a normative concept that the law constructed---Concept of purposive interpretation rested on the straightforward premise that law was enacted Read More... |
2017 PTD 1875 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
Mohammad Shabbar Zaidi, FCA, Asim Zulfiqar, FCA and Muhammad Arshad, FCA VS Amjad Javed Hashmi, D.R. and Dr. Farrukh Ansari, CIR, LTU |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 122(5-A) & 177 | Amendment of Assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Interpretation applicability---Scope and object of S.122(5-A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001--- Question of law for determination was that as to “whether S.122(5-A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, allowed the Commissioner/Additional Read More... |
2017 PTD 1911 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
Mohammad Shabbar Zaidi, FCA, Asim Zulfiqar, FCA and Muhammad Arshad, FCA VS Amjad Javed Hashmi, D.R. and Dr. Farrukh Ansari, CIR, LTU |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 122(5-A) & 177 | Amendment of Assessment |
Application of S.122(5-A), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Scope---Audit proceedings and amendment of assessment---Section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was not a charging section, but it only defined procedure for conduct of audit through S.122 of the Income Read More... |
2017 PTD 1911 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS CENTRAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 221 | Rectification of order of Appellate Tribunal |
Remand of case by the Appellate Tribunal---Rectification of order of Appellate Tribunal---Application was filed by the taxpayer under S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, seeking rectification of impugned order passed by the Appellate Tribunal whereby case was Read More... |
2017 PTD 2013 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
S. NASIM AHMED SHAH AND 115 OTHERS VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH GOVERNOR AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979 Ss. 16 & 2 (c)(i)---FBR Circular No. 15 of 1997 dated 06.11.1997 | Salary; Golden Handshake |
“Salary” liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Amount received by retiring employees under a voluntary separation scheme/golden handshake, as “salary” under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Petitioners, inter alia, sought reimbursement of Read More... |
2017 PTD 2029 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
S. NASIM AHMED SHAH AND 115 OTHERS VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH GOVERNOR AND ANOTHER |
Constitution of Pakistan Art.189 | Direction of Supreme Court binding on other courts |
Direction of Supreme Court binding on other courts---High Court could not revisit, explicate or expound the law on an issue decided by the Supreme Court, which had a binding effect on the High Read More... |
2017 PTD 2029 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
S. NASIM AHMED SHAH AND 115 OTHERS VS STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH GOVERNOR AND ANOTHER |
Constitution of Pakistan Art.189 & 201 | Decisions of Supreme and High Court |
Decisions of Supreme and High Court binding on subordinate courts---Doctrine of “precedent”, “stare decisis” and “ratio decidendi” contained in Arts. 189 & 201 of the Constitution---Scope---Articles 189 & 201 of the Constitution recognized and Read More... |
2017 PTD 2029 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
BLI PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 182 & 165--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 73 | Withholding tax statement |
Requirement of filing statement of withholding tax---Penalty for non-filing of withholding tax statement---Determination as to what constitutes a “Money Bill” under Arts.73 of the Constitution---Nature and scope imposition of “penalty” under the Income Tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 2050 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI
VS MESSRS HASSAN ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- ---- S. 23(1)(xviii) | Permissible deductions |
Permissible deductions falling within the purview of S.23(1)(xviii) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 [since repealed]---“Encashment of bank guarantee” for breach of contract by the assesse---Damages or compensation paid in the course of carrying on Read More... |
2017 PTD 2054 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI
VS MESSRS HASSAN ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD. AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 23(1)(xviii), 24(j), 136 | Fine/Penalty |
State Bank of Pakistan Foreign Exchange Manual, Chap. 13, Para. 44---Permissible deductions falling within the purview of S. 23(1)(xviii) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Scope---Fine/penalty imposed for violation of a law---State Bank imposed a penalty on the Read More... |
2017 PTD 2054 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SARDAR QASIM HASSAN KHAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 231-B, 234 & 148 | Import of motor vehicles— Advance tax on private motor vehicles |
Import of motor vehicles---Advance tax on private motor vehicles---Petitioners/taxpayers impugned demand of advance tax under S. 231-B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 at the time of their application for registration of imported vehicles---Contention of the Read More... |
2017 PTD 2064 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SARDAR QASIM HASSAN KHAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC |
Interpretation of Statues | Interpretation of taxing |
--Interpretation of taxing/taxation statutes---Resolution of ambiguities---Scope---In case of any ambiguity or two possible interpretations, the one that favours the taxation authorities had to be Read More... |
2017 PTD 2064 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2017 |
M/s Vincraft (Pvt.) Ltd. VS Federal Board of Revenue and others. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S. 175--- Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S. 38 | Power of entering and searching premises of tax-payer |
Power of entering and searching premises of tax-payer---Scope---Petitioners company was aggrieved of entry and search of its premises by Income Tax authorities---Validity---Legislation of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was later in time to Sales Tax Act, 1990, Read More... |
2017 PTD 2114 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX. VS M/S SEFAM (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.122(5), 111, 120 & 133 | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment--"Definite information obtained from audit or otherwise-Meaning, scope and application of "definite information" for amendment of assessment- Unexplained income or assets---Application of S.111 of the Income Tar Ordinance, Read More... |
2017 PTD 2162 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- --- Ss. 127, 128(1A), 131(5) & 132 | Recovery of tax demand |
Recovery of tax demand---Stay---Powers of Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Commissioner (Appeals)/appellate Authority, had refused request of the taxpayer for stay of recovery of tax demand---Taxpayer had contended that appellate Authority had rejected stay sought by Read More... |
2017 PTD 2169 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Ss. 127, 128(1A), 131(5) & 132 | Administration of justice |
---Court interpret law for advancement of justice---Law should not be allowed to operate so as to defeat the ends of justice---Court and quasi judicial officer, were required, not only to do meaningful speedy justice, but also must perform their Read More... |
2017 PTD 2169 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- --- S. 170 | Administration of justice |
---“Refund”---Meaning and scope---Refund, would mean returning back to the taxpayer of the amount of tax which was payed in excess of what was due from him---Refund, in essence, would imply and postulate some amount of tax which had already been paid to the Read More... |
2017 PTD 2169 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
KHAYABAN-E-IQBAL (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 21(2) Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 12(5) | Sales tax registration |
Suspension of sales tax registration---General sales tax, collection of---Scope---Sales tax registration was suspended and extra general sales tax was collected---Validity---Petitioner’s sales tax registration was suspended on account of non-filing of sales tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 2191 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. BELA LUBRICANTS (PVT.) LTD.
VS COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S. 131 | Recalling of order |
Recalling of order of Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Application by taxpayer for recalling the order passed by Appellate Tribunal---Main appeal had already been dismissed in default by the Tribunal---After dismissal of appeal, the taxpayer moved Read More... |
2017 PTD 2210 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II VS AL-HAMAD INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL (PVT.) LTD. Muhammad Sarfaraz Ali Metlo for Applicant. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 133, 132 & 131 | Nature of Jurisdiction |
Reference to High Court---Nature of jurisdiction of High Court under S.133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Concurrent findings of fact recorded by two Appellate Forums under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; unless found to be perverse and contrary to record, Read More... |
2017 PTD 2212 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2017 |
M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.221 & 122 | Amendment was the formal revision |
“Amendment”---Meaning of scope---“Amendment” was the formal revision or addition proposed or made to a statute, Constitution, pleadings, order or other instrument and it was a change made by addition, deletion or correction; an alteration in the wording, a Read More... |
2017 PTD 2227 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2017 |
M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.221 | “Rectification” of mistake |
“Rectification” of mistake---Meaning---Rectification was the court’s equitable correction of contractual term that was misstated, the judicial alteration of a written contract to make it conform to the true intention of the parties---As an equitable Read More... |
2017 PTD 2227 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2017 |
M/S. SAINDAK METALS LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR VS CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 221, 122 & 133 | Amendment of assessment |
Assessment---Amendment of assessment---Rectification of mistake---Taxpayer in its return classified a portion of its income under the head of “income from business”, which returns was subsequently rectified under S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 by an Read More... |
2017 PTD 2227 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
M/S. A.H. SYED AND COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., JHANG VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 133-A & 233 | Brokerage or commission |
Payment on account of brokerage or commission under International Accounting Standards though a distributor was obliged to recognized only the amount of commission as revenue in his final accounts; however, as per local commercial practices, only a small number of Read More... |
2017 PTD 2234 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.73, 3, 8A, 7 & 47 | Input tax adjustment |
Sales tax liability---Determination of---Input tax adjustment---Sales tax transactions not admissible---Documents to establish genuineness of transactions under S.73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Blacklisted suppliers---Blacklisting of suppliers subsequent to Read More... |
2017 PTD 2247 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
M/S PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), LTU, ISLAMABAD ETC. |
Income Tax Act, 1922 14(2)(c) | Tax deduction and collection Expenses; commission |
Tax can be levied or amended under Read More... |
2017 PTD 1372 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI VS MAL PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 29, 114, 120 & 122(5-A) | Amendment of Assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Bad debt, deletion of---Return of income filed by taxpayer was deemed as assessment order under S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Said assessment was considered erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue requiring Read More... |
2017 PTD 2291 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
USMAN HASSAN & ANOTHER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 53, 159, Cl, 47B of Part IV of Second Sched & Cl. 57 of Part I of the Second Sched | Exemption from income |
Exemption from Income Tax---Nature of exemptions and tax concession in the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 under S. 53 thereof---Exemption granted to income of approved recognized Provident Fund approved Gratuity Fund or Provident Pension Read More... |
2017 PTD 2340 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY-LPG PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH REPRESENTATIVE
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD THROUGH SECRETARY AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 161, 162, 182(2), 205 & 236-A---Constitution of Pakistan Arts. 176 & 192 | Advance income tax --- Auction by High Court |
Advance income tax, collection of---Auction by High Court---Scope---Petitioner company participated in auction proceedings conducted by High Court and its bid was accepted by High Court---Petitioner company had assailed show-cause notice issued by income tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 2366 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-IV)
VS MESSRS SAIMA PACKAGING (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 13(7), 85(2) & (3), 108, 109 & 133 | Arms length |
“Arm’s length”, principle of---Interest free loans to employees---Concurrent findings of two forums---Authorities were aggrieved of findings of two forums below declaring that interest free loans given by tax payer to its employees was covered under principle Read More... |
2017 PTD 2413 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SUFI MUHAMMAD FARRUKH AMIN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Levy, Tax |
Fiscal Statute---Levy---Tax---Presumption---Court would presume constitutionality of a statute and that a particular levy was a tax if that was the stance of Federal Government and other authorities. Determining factor---For a levy to be a fee, relation Read More... |
2017 PTD 83 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD KHALID SETHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss. 122(5) & 133 | Amendment of Assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Nature---Question of Law---Scope---Question before the High Court was “whether Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that amendment of taxpayer’s Read More... |
2017 PTD 2461 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
SUFI MUHAMMAD FARRUKH AMIN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Support Levy Act of 2013 Ss. 3 & 9 Constitution of Pakistan, Art.25 | Reasonable classification |
Reasonable classification---Intelligible differentia---Petitioners assailed Income Support Levy at the rate of 0.5% on the value of net movable assets/wealth as being ultra vires the Constitution---Validity---Reasonable classification was permissible provided it was Read More... |
2017 PTD 83 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-II), LTU, ISLAMABAD
VS MESSRS GHAZI BAROTHA CONTRACTORS ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance of 1979 Ss. 11(1)(b), 52 & 86 | Avoidance of double taxation |
Convention between the Government of Republic of Italy and Islamic Republic of Pakistan, for avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to Taxes on Income, Art. 7---Reference---Foreign Banks---Repayment of loans---Dispute between Read More... |
2017 PTD 150 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS LUCKY PARAGON READY MIX LTD., KARACHI
VS C.I.R., (APPEALS-IV), KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 2(25). (35), (37), (41), 3, 11(2), 13, 36, 46 & 65 Sixth Schedule | Tax fraud or tax evasion |
Failure to pay tax due---Tax fraud or tax evasion, determination of---Show-cause notice, validity of---Department, while scrutiny of data available in “Integrated Tax Management System” (Income Tax and Sales Tax Returns) of registered person, considered that it Read More... |
2017 PTD 156 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2017 |
MESSRS AMIN SPINNING MILLS LTD., INDUSTRIAL AREA MIRPUR AZAD KASHMIR THROUGH DIRECTOR (AUTHORIZED)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (AJ&K) AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S.133 | Limitation |
Reference to the High Court---Limitation---High Court dismissed Reference being time barred---Validity---When Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed order and notice was served then the party or assesse or Commissioner Income Tax might move an application to the Read More... |
2017 PTD 201 (2017)115 TAX 436 2017 PTCL 227 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, RTO, HYDERABAD
VS MESSRS JAMSHORO POWER COMPANY LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss.113, 74(1) & 2(68) | Minimum Tax on Income |
Minimum tax on income---Determination---Question was whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the decision of Commissioner of Inland Revenue (Appeals) for deletion of minimum tax under S.113 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, as the same had been Read More... |
2017 PTD 237 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, RTO, HYDERABAD
VS MESSRS JAMSHORO POWER COMPANY LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss. 39, 18(1)(d) & 11(1)(a) | Income from Business/Income from other sources |
Income from business/Income from other sources---Determination---Question before the High Court was that whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified to be hold that the amount reimbursed by the purchaser of electric power to the taxpayer, being the income tax paid Read More... |
2017 PTD 237 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 S. 131(5) Constitution of Pakistan Art. 199 | Stay of recovery |
Constitutional petition---Stay of recovery---Tax payer was aggrieved of non-extending of stay order under S. 131(5) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Validity---High Court directed Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue to decide appeal of taxpayer expeditiously preferably Read More... |
2017 PTD 243 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (RTO), PESHAWAR
VS ZUBAIR AHMAD |
Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 Ss.122, 133, 177(1) & 214-C | Selection of Audit |
Reference---Jurisdiction---Selection for audit---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue remanded matter to Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding the same keeping in view the grounds raised in memo of appeal---Authorities were aggrieved of clarification made by Read More... |
2017 PTD 450 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax , PESHAWAR VS Messrs ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK LTD. |
Interpretation of statutes | Repealed statute |
Provisions of a repealed statute preserved by a saving clause in the repealing statute---When a statute repeals and earlier statute and it was an unqualified repeal, then the repeal, then the effect of such repeal was that the earlier statute got repealed in its Read More... |
2016 PTD 1339 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax , PESHAWAR VS Messrs ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 239(1) | Repealed statute |
Scope---Section 239 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, by its very nature, being a saving clause, was intended to preserve certain powers and procedures contained in the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Several procedures for the correct assessment of income Read More... |
2016 PTD 1339 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
PETITIONERS: MUHAMMAD TARIQ VS RESPONDENTS: THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)-- ---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 2(3)(ii) & 10---120, 122(5)(9) & 122-C | Refund claim |
Refund claim---Complainant, who had been regularly filing returns of income had filed return of income for relevant year annually within due date---Department initiated proceedings under S.122-C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and completed provisional assessment Read More... |
2016 PTD 2104 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax , PESHAWAR VS Messrs ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- 122(5A) & 239(1) | Assessment order relating to period of repealed income tax ordinance 1979 |
Original assessment order relating to period of repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 i.e. on or before 30-06-2002---Commissioner serving notice to tax-payer under S. 122(5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, to amend such original assessment order---Legality---Sending Read More... |
2016 PTD 1339 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MESSRS CRYSTAL TEXTILE PROCESSING MILLS (PVT.) LTD., GUJRANWALA VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(c), 40(1)(3), 122(5-A) & 131 | Amendment of assessment; Lease rentals under the head ‘income from other sources’ |
Amendment of assessment---Declaring lease, rentals under the head ‘income from other sources’---Additions---Return filed by the taxpayer for the tax year 2010, was deemed to be treated as assessment---Subsequently, it was found by the department that deemed Read More... |
2016 PTD 2108 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax , PESHAWAR VS Messrs ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK LTD. |
Interpretation of statutes | Amendment |
Amendment---Provision incorporated in a statute through an amendment that was procedural in nature---Retrospective rule of construction was to be applied to such provision---Such a provision had to be construed as if it was incorporated on the date when the main Read More... |
2016 PTD 1339 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (FESCO) through Director VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 235 | Electricity consumption---Collection of advance tax |
Electricity consumption---Collection of advance tax on the amount of electricity bill---Scope---Federal Board of Revenue issued clarification that advance tax had to be collected on the gross amount of electricity bill---Contention of petitioner was that advance tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 2171 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax , PESHAWAR VS Messrs ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) ---(1979) 239(1) [as amended by the Finance Act, 2002(sic)]----Preamble [since repealed] | Retrospective effect of amended |
Retrospective effect of amended S. 239(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Merely because the amended S. 239(1) was inserted in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, on 01-07-2003 instead of 1-7-2002 when the parent statute i.e. Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 came into Read More... |
2016 PTD 1339 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
MESSRS MERCK (PVT.) LTD, KARACHI AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-I, LTU, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 67 & 237 | Insurance commission |
Taxpayer, had agitated against allocation of expenses against insurance commission---Validity---Insurance commission, was part and parcel of the main business activities, as same related to “Business assets”---Allowable expenses, were to be apportioned that Read More... |
2016 PTD 1356 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
MESSRS MERCK (PVT.) LTD, KARACHI AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-I, LTU, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 34(3) | Income from business |
Income from business---Accrual basis accounting---Disallowance of unrealized exchange loss---Taxpayer had agitated confirmation of authorities below regarding disallowing of unrealized exchange loss being national in nature, and not allowable under S. 34(3) of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1356 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
MESSRS MERCK (PVT.) LTD, KARACHI AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-I, LTU, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 21(c), 153(1)(b) & 122(1)(5) | Encapsulation charges |
Deletion of the disallowance of encapsulation charges---Appellant/department had agitated the deletion of disallowance of encapsulation charges by Appellate Authority below---Assessing Officer confronted taxpayer during audit proceedings that it had claimed Read More... |
2016 PTD 1356 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA VS MESSRS KARWAN-E-SIDDIQUE-E-AKBAR (PVT.) LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 114, 120, 122(5-A), 131, Second Schedule, Part IV, clause (72-A) | Amendment of assessment |
Payment of minimum tax on gross receipts---Amendments of assessment---Returns filed by taxpayer (Hajj operators) for tax years 2010 & 2011, declaring net income, were deemed to be treated as assessment---Subsequently Additional Commissioner/Assessing Officer Read More... |
2016 PTD 2122 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
MESSRS MERCK (PVT.) LTD, KARACHI AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-I, LTU, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 111(1)(c) | Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Annulling the addition---Contention was that Assessing Officer was explained that manufacturing charges, paid to another Pharmaceutical company, included previous year’s balance---Assessing Officer, termed same as mere statement; and Read More... |
2016 PTD 1356 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
MESSRS MERCK (PVT.) LTD, KARACHI AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-I, LTU, KARACHI AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 108 | Transaction between associates |
Transaction between associates---Annulment of---Disallowance of royalty claim---Department had agitated the annulment of disallowance of royalty---Appellate Authority below for previous year i.e. tax year 2009, had set aside the issue; and for the year under Read More... |
2016 PTD 1356 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 36(1) & 36(2) | Recovery of tax; Limitation |
Recovery of tax not levied or short levied---Show cause notice---Limitation---Scope---Sections 36(1) & 36(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 established that show-cause notice issued beyond very time of limitation was in flagrant disregard of law inasmuch as recovery of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3 | Sales Tax on value/Price fixed by Board of Revenue |
Sales Tax on value/price fixed by Board of Revenue---Double Taxation---Sugar mills manufacturing while crystalline sugar made its supply to wholesalers and charged sales tax at 16% on such value as fixed and notified by Federal Board of Revenue for period under Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7 & 8 | Levy and collection of tax |
Levy and collection of tax on specified goods---Double taxation---Scope---Mandatory to prove as to whether sales tax so charged at purchase stage/level was deposited/paid by supplier company of taxpayer or otherwise---Case could not be said to be the one of double Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 23. R.6 | Compulsory registration |
Tax invoices---Compulsory registration---Scope---Sales Tax invoice could only be issued under S. 23 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 by specified person only---Person not registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990 could not issue a sales tax invoice under S.23 of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 23 | Tax invoices |
Tax invoices to be issued to registered person only---Scope---Sales Tax invoice to be issued under S. 23 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 was envisaged to be issued only by a registered person having a Sales Tax Registration Number which was evident from the fact that S. 23 Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MASOOD AND CO., PESHAWAR VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(5), 3(1)(a), 14 & 23. R,6 | Tax invoices |
Tax invoices---Registration---Compulsory registration---Scope---Combined reading of Ss.2(25) & 23 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and R.6 of Sales Tax Rules, 2006 showed that where a person was required to be registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990 as envisaged under S. 14 Read More... |
2016 PTD 1377 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
The Commissioner Inland VS M/s Haral Textile Mills Limited. Revenue. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 2(32), 50, 52 & 86 | Deduction of tax at source |
Deduction of tax at source---Failure to deduct or pay tax---Liability of person---Scope---Customs Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deciding appeals filed by assesses which were remanded by Supreme Read More... |
2016 PTD 2253 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statues | Explanation |
‘Explanation’ appended to a section of an enactment/statute---Scope and function---Such explanation stipulates the meaning of a word, term, or phrase, and becomes part and parcel of the enactment---Function of such an explanation is to clear the ambiguity and Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2016 |
M/s Cherat Packaging Ltd
By Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmad (Senior), Advocate
VS Govt of Pakistan etc. By Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmad (Junior) Advocate |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53(1), 122-B, 151, 159(2), 206, Second Sched., Part-I, clause 57(3), Second Sched., Part-IV, clause 47B & Sixth Sched. VI | Exemption certificate/ Trust |
Exemption certificate---Trust---Grievance of taxpayers was that they were not required to obtain or produce exemption certificate and in turn the payer of their profits on investments was not to deduct income tax under Ss.151 & 159 (2) of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2016 PTD 2257 (2018)117 TAX 387 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statues | Declaratory statues |
Declaratory statutes/provisions---Scope---Purpose of declaratory provisions or declaratory statutes was to remove doubts which existed, or may exist, in the meaning or effect of a provision or statute, as the case may Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2016 |
M/s Cherat Packaging Ltd
By Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmad (Senior), Advocate
VS Govt of Pakistan etc. By Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmad (Junior) Advocate |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute---Procedural provision---While reviewing cases relating to fiscal matters, provision concerning procedure or tax recovery mechanism provided in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, are to be strictly construed in favour of Revenue and not the Read More... |
2016 PTD 2257 (2018)117 TAX 387 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed] 80D | Minimum Tax liability |
Minimum tax liability---‘Turnover from all sources’ and ‘aggregate of declared turnover’ (as used in S. 80D of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979)---Meaning and interpretation---Said phrases were to be necessarily read in conjunction with the explanation to S. Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Meaning of a word |
Where the legislature defined, in the same statute, the meaning of a word used therein, such definition most authoritatively expressed its intent---Such definition and construction was binding on the courts. Words defined in a statute---When a word had Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001 113 [as it existed prior to its omission by the Finance Act (I of 2008] | Minimum tax liability; Turnover |
Minimum tax liability---“Turnover”---Meaning---Phrase ‘turnover from all sources’ used in S.113(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001[as it existed prior to its omission by the Finance Act, 2008] was to be read in conjunction with the meaning of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) [as it existed prior to its omission by the Finance Act (I of 2008] Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) 113.--S80D | Minimum tax liability |
Minimum tax liability---Scope---Aggregate of the declared turnover as defined in S.80D of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 from the sale of goods, rendering, giving or supplying of services or benefits or execution of contracts had to be taken into account for Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal or taxing statute |
Fiscal or taxing statute---Strict and literal approach was to be adopted while interpreting fiscal or taxing statute---Court could not read into or impute something when the provisions of a taxing or fiscal statute were Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979)---Finance Act (I of 2008]--- Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) 113---169---[since repealed], S.80D | Minimum tax liability |
Minimum tax liability---Turnover, calculation of---Receipt of income subject to ‘Presumptive Tax’---Nothing in the wording of S.80D of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and S.113 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 suggested that for the purposes of calculating the Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Schedule to a statute |
Schedule to a statute could be used as an intrinsic aid to interpret the statute’s provisions---Schedule was as much a part of the statute, and was as much an enactment as any other Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4)(a), 80C(2)(a)(i) & First Sched., Part I, Section E, clause (i) | Schedule to a statute |
Schedule to a statute---Presumptive tax---‘Services rendered’ pursuant to ‘execution of a contract’---Services rendered necessarily flowed from execution of a contract, but execution of a contract would not necessarily result in rendering of services---In Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LEGAL DIVISION, LAHORE and others
VS KHURSHID AHMAD and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Schedule to a statute |
Terms in a statute---‘Ordinary meaning’ and ‘technical meaning’---Context of the term---where an enactment used a term which had both an ordinary and a technical meaning, the question as to which meaning the term was intended to have was determined by the Read More... |
2016 PTD 1393 (2016)113 TAX 369 2016 PTCL 574 2016 PLD 545 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
AKSA SOLUTIONS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) --Ss.21(c) & 122(1) | Deductions not allowed----Stationery Office Supplies, repair etc. expenses----Additions |
----Deductions not allowed----Stationery Office Supplies, repair and maintenance, selling expenses and other expenses----Additions----Taxpayer contended that S.21(c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 had wrongly been applied on such expenses which did not come under Read More... |
2016 PTD 7 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
Messrs PFIZER PAKISTAN LTD. through Company Secretary and others
VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120(IA), 122(5), 177 & 214-C | Conducting of audit |
Conducting of audit---Commissioner Income Tax, jurisdiction of---Assesses were aggrieved of powers exercised by Commissioner Income Tax to conduct their audit under S.120(1A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, as it was solely dependent upon decision of Board of Read More... |
2016 P T D 1429 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
MAQSOOD AFZAL VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----------Ss. 177(10), 121(1)(d), 137 & 214-C---- Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Ss.2(3) & 10(4) | Selection of case for audit |
---Selection of case for audit-----Maladministration----Complainant contended that he started business with effect from 18-12-2012; that return was due from tax year 2013, and not for tax year 2012; that his case could not be selected for audit under S.214-C of Read More... |
2016 PTD 12 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs PAKISTAN CYCLE INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., L.T.U., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) ---Ss. 80(2)(b)(v), 113, 122(5-A), 131 & 221 | Amendment of assessment-----Imposition of minimum tax |
---Amendment of assessment-----Imposition of minimum tax----Appellant, being Co-operative Society, was deriving income from manufacturing of bi-cycles and motorcycles----Assessment of the appellant, was amended, wherein minimum tax under S.113 of Income Tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 15 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
LINKDOTNET TELECOM LIMITED VS CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 152(5) & 2(54)---S.R.O. 248(I)/2001 dated 26.04.2001 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Convention for Avoidance of Double Taxation Between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Government of the United Arab Emirates, Arts. 12(3) & 11---Deduction of tax at Source---Double taxation---Payments to non-residents---“Royalty”, definition and Read More... |
2016 PTD 1436 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
ENI PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 205 | Imposition of default charges |
Imposition of default charges or additional tax for delayed payment---Claim for waiver of default surcharge---Taxpayer, who was obliged to pay certain amount of tax on 29-3-2011, paid the same on 30-4-2012, with delay of 400 days---Assessing Officers being Read More... |
2016 PTD 1462 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
TAHIR ABBAS and others VS GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others |
Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Rules, 1997 Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Rules, 2001, 2--- Rr. 5, 6, 12 & 13 | Assessment of agricultural income |
Assessment of agricultural income tax---Procedure---Filing of Return of income---Scope---Limitation for assessment---Best judgement assessment---Assessment orders by the Collector for served different assessment years---Validity---First assessment order passed by Read More... |
2016 PTD 1470 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120 & 177 | Self-assessment scheme audit |
Self---assessment scheme---Audit---Scope---In any self-assessment scheme, audit is the most effective and efficient tool to verify accuracy of declarations made in returns, treated as assessment order---Audit is the only process for the purposes of determining that Read More... |
2016 PTD 1484 (2017)115 TAX 27 2016 PTCL 302 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Headquarters Bench, Islamabad | 2016 |
Dr. JAMEEL AHMED VS C.I.R., REGIONAL TAX OFFICE SARGODHA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- ----Ss. 111, 114, 120, 122, 131 & 177 | Amendment of assessment----Taxpayer, who was a Doctor, |
---Filing of return of income----Assessment----Amendment of assessment----Taxpayer, who was a Doctor, derived professional income, property income and agriculture income-----Taxpayer filed return of income for the year under review------Later on same was revised by Read More... |
2016 PTD 45 (2015)111 TAX 345 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Interpretation of statutes | Redundancy |
Redundancy---Scope---Every word and expression has to be given meaning and redundancy has to be Read More... |
2016 PTD 1484 (2017)115 TAX 27 2016 PTCL 302 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Interpretation of statutes | Procedural provision |
Procedural provision---Scope---Principles of strict interpretation do not extend to the machinery of procedural provisions---Such provisions are to be interpreted liberally so as to effectuate charging Read More... |
2016 PTD 1484 (2017)115 TAX 27 2016 PTCL 302 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PETITIONER(S): PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
VS RESPONDENT(S): FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Constitution of Pakistan 114(6), 114(6A), 120(1A), 121, 121(1), 122(1), 122(3), 122(4A), 122(5A), 122(9), 174, 175, 176, 177, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 177(4), 177(5), 177(6), 207(1), 207(2), 214C, 214D--- Arts. 10A, 18 & 25 | Self-assessment scheme; audit |
Self-assessment scheme---Audit---Commissioner, power of---Due process of law, right of free trade and discrimination---Assesses assailed the show cause notices issued to them for conducting of their audit against the returns filed under Self-Assessment Read More... |
2016 PTD 1484 (2017)115 TAX 27 2016 PTCL 302 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(15) | Debt; Defined and explained |
“Debt”---Defined and explained---Debt, could be defined as a sum of money due from one person to another---Where a taxpayer (Investment company) was entitled to receive a sum of money from another, at law or in equity, it was accepted that a debt existed---There Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 29 | Bad debt; condition for writing off |
Bad debt---Existence, onus, conditions for writing off---Bad debt, presupposed existence of debt and such debt, must be for the purpose of business---Assesse was to establish that the debt had become irrecoverable during the year in which the income had to be Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(15), 20, 21, 21(c), 22, 23, 28, 29, 67, 122(5A), 153 | Apportionment of common expenses |
Apportionment of common expenses to income under Final Tax Regime (FTR)---In terms of S.20 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, in computing the income of a person chargeable to tax under the head “income from business” for a tax year, a deduction would be allowed for Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Rules, 2002 R. 5---SRO No.586(I)/91, dated 30-6-1991 | Addition on account of non-deduction of withholding tax |
Addition on account of non-deduction of withholding tax from salary and prerequisites---Appellant/taxpayer had produced a schedule of 13 employees, who were paid non-taxable allowance on account of POL, maintenance of vehicle and reimbursement of medical Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(c), 122(5-A) & 153---S.R.O. No. 1194(I)/2006 dated 15-11-2006 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Convention for Avoidance of Double Taxation between Government of Pakistan and Government of Saudi Arabia, Arts.14 & 15---Additions of expenses incurred by assesse on Saudi Office Employees’---Question before the Tribunal was about admissibility of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(15), 20, 21, 21(c), 22, 23, 28, 29, 67, 122(5A), 153 | Add back on account of amount written off |
Add back on account of amount written off in respect of non-recoverable amount---“Bad and doubtful debt” amount in question represented the advance given for the purchase of 32.718 million shares of a Bank---Out of that amount the tax-payer company only received Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SAUDI PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 22, 23, 28 & 32 | Unearned Finance Lease; Additions in income |
Unearned Finance Lease---Additions in income in respect of unearned Finance Lease---Broad features of the Finance Lease---Addition of unearned Lease Finance to the computation of taxable income of the taxpayer, an investment company---Taxpayer, had entered into Read More... |
2016 PTD 1519 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN OIL FIELDS LTD. through Authorised Attorney and General Manager
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 130 | Appellate Tribunal; Proceedings |
Appellate Tribunal---Proceedings---Scope---Appellate Tribunal is the first independent forum outside the department to decide rights and liabilities of taxpayer as well as safeguarding the interests of exchequer---Proceedings before Appellate Tribunal are judicial Read More... |
2016 PTD 1590 (2016)114 TAX 75 2016 PTCL 208 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN OIL FIELDS LTD. through Authorised Attorney and General Manager
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue and 2 others |
Constitution of Pakistan Arts . 189 & 188 | Supreme court judgment; Binding nature |
Judgment of Supreme Court---Binding nature---Review, pendency of---Even if a review is pending against judgement of the Supreme Court the same is binding unless it has been reviewed and a different conclusion is reached by Supreme Court---Judgment of Supreme Court Read More... |
2016 PTD 1590 (2016)114 TAX 75 2016 PTCL 208 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN OIL FIELDS LTD. through Authorised Attorney and General Manager
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(2), 3(c) & 130 | Appointment of Chairman Appellate Tribunal |
De facto doctrine, applicability---Appointment of Chairman Appellate Tribunal---Constitution with Chief Justice---Scope---Petitioners assailed appointment of Chairman and members of Appellate Tribunal on the ground that Chief Justice of Pakistan was not consulted on Read More... |
2016 PTD 1590 (2016)114 TAX 75 2016 PTCL 208 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
MUMTAZ HUSSAIN KHAN
VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 2(28A), 4-B & 236-M(7) | Super tax; Levy of bonus shares |
Super tax, levy of---Bonus shares---Petitioner was an assesse and aggrieved of imposition of super tax on his income from bonus shares---Full face value of bonus shares could not be included in ‘Income’ for purposes of ‘super tax’ by applying S.236-M(7)(ii) Read More... |
2016 PTD 1667 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
MUHAMMAD SALEEM VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), 122A, 121.---- 2(3) & 10 | revision under S. 122A |
Amendment of assessment---Revision by the Commissioner---Maladministration---Scope of revision under S. 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Assessment of complainant/taxpayer was amended under provisions of S.122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 where after Read More... |
2016 PTD 1691 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER (WASTERN) S.A. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Absurdity |
Absurdity cannot be attributed to Read More... |
2016 PTD 1702 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS KHUSHNOOD AHMED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 133, 153, 153(1), 153(9), 153(9)(b), 153(9)(c) | F.I.R. |
Question: (c) Whether Appellate Tribunal was justified to exclude the services provided under an agreement/contract from the transactions envisaged under clause (c) of Section 153(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001? Answer: Department, while interpreting Read More... |
2016 PTD 1146 (2016)113 TAX 193 2016 PTCL 745 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
KHYBER TEA AND FOOD COMPANY and another
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another Customs Appeal No.K-845 of 2013, decided on 6th August, 2015. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 148 & 50(50) | Imports----Recovery of short levied income tax by officer of Inland Revenue |
---Imports----Recovery of short levied income tax by officer of Inland Revenue-----Validity----Powers and scope of Customs Officers----Powers available to Customs Officers in terms of Sections 148 & 50(5) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 were limited to collection Read More... |
2016 PTD 80 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LEGAL DIVISION, R.T.O.
VS Messrs MATRIX PRESS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- -----Ss. 21(1)(m), 22(15) & 133-- | Depreciation, claim of-----Disallowance of expenses |
----Depreciation, claim of-----Disallowance of expenses----Concurrent findings of facts-----Authorities were aggrieved of finding of Appellate Tribunal holding that claim of initial and normal depreciation were allowable in spite of facts that same related to repair Read More... |
2016 PTD 97 (2017)115 TAX 337 2016 PTCL 396 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
Messrs PAK ARAB PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. through Attorney
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- ----Ss.153 & 122(9)----Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Payments for goods, service and contracts----Term ‘service’, scope of |
----Constitutional petition----Payments for goods, service and contracts----Term ‘service’, scope of----Assessment under ‘Normal Tax Regime’ or ‘Final Tax Regime’----Determination----Notice to amend tax return----Petitioner had been filing tax returns Read More... |
2016 PTD 100 (2017)115 TAX 451 2016 PTCL 362 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER (WASTERN) S.A. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Interpretation of statutes | Mandatory/directory; provision |
Mandatory/directory provision of law---Determination---Where consequences of failure to comply with a provision is not mentioned, such provision is directory and where consequence is expressly mentioned, said provision is Read More... |
2016 PTD 1702 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER (WASTERN) S.A. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131(5) | Stay of recovery; Duration |
Stay of recovery---Duration---Petitioner was a taxpayer and his grievance was that despite pendency of appeal before Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, authorities were bent upon to recover disputed amount---Validity---Time specified in S.131(5) of Income Tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 1702 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
D.J. BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS through Partner and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 6 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122, 124 & 129 | Order of attachment of property; Notice/ opportunity of hearing |
Order of attachment of property---Notice/opportunity of hearing---Requirement---Amendment of assessment---Assessment of giving effect to an order---Decision in appeal---Appellant tax-payer, having taken different stance in the appeal contending that the undisclosed Read More... |
2016 PTD 1723 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
D.J. BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS through Partner and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 6 others |
ncome Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 122, 122(4), 122(5)(A), 124, 129 | Right to fair trial |
Right to fair trial---Maxim ‘audi alteram partem’---Applicability---Nobody should be condemned unheard---Authority is under duty to confront the person against whom any adverse order is being passed, with proper notice detailing the reasons for taking any Read More... |
2016 PTD 1723 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
MUHAMMAD AKBAR LEGHARI and 2 others
VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Revenue Division, Islamabad and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Constitution of Pakistan 153---Art. 247 | Payments for goods, services and contracts |
Payments for goods, services and contracts---Applicability to Tribal Areas---Petitioners assailed the order regarding issuance of certificate by Federal Government, which provided that the contractors, being the residents of Provincially Tribal Areas/Federal Read More... |
2016 PTD 2371 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
SWANCI KARYANA STORE, MIANWALI and others
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., SARGODHA and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 114(6), 120, 122 & 131 | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition in income of taxpayer chargeable to tax---Taxpayer filed returns, declaring net income for tax years 2006 to 2009---Assessing Officer obtained information from third parties, and on the basis of that, an inference was drawn Read More... |
2016 PTD 2376 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Messrs ROYAL STEEL MILLS through Managing Member and another
VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law, Islamabad and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, 205--- ---Rr.1 & 2 | Default surcharge---Temporary injunction |
Default surcharge---Temporary injunction granted/extended beyond the subject-matter of appeal---Validity---Subject matter of the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was in relation to the default surcharge under S.205 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2016 PTD 2396 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (ZONE-III) LTU, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 113, 120, 120(1), 122(5-A), 122(9), Second Sched., Part-I, Cls. 102(A), 132 | Liability to minimum tax; gross receipt |
Liability to minimum tax---Subsidy received as tariff “gross receipt”---Nature--- “Turnover”---Connotation---Taxpayer company, engaged in the business of Electric Power transmission of Electric Power transmission and distribution, filed income return for tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 2398 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
MARI PETROLEUM COMPANY LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(5-A), 122(9) | Coercive measures, restraining of |
Coercive measures, restraining of---Authorities issued show cause notice and rejected objections taken by taxpayer---Notice of demand raised by authorities was assailed by taxpayer before appellate authority---Grievance of taxpayer was that neither any interim Read More... |
2016 PTD 2406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME/WEALTH TAX VS MUHAMMAD AMIN |
Income Tax Ordinance, (XXXI of 1979) 136(1), 1(2) & 156 | Reference; Limitation |
Reference---Limitation---Refusal to refer question of law to High Court---Miscellaneous application against original order dated 07-02-2001 was dismissed on 28-08-2001 which did not merge in original order---Effect---Authorities were required to challenge original Read More... |
2016 PTD 2409 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax COMPANIES
ZONE, ISLAMABAD/WEALTH TAX VS Messrs SHIFA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979--- ---Rules for the Computation of Depreciation Allowance Third Schedule--- ---R.2 | Hospital build/ Depreciation allowance |
Hospital building---Depreciation allowance---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal treated hospital owned by assesse as “plant” thereby entitling it to depreciation when assesse had not pleaded to treat it as such---Validity---Three categories specified under R.2 of Read More... |
2016 PTD 2419 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
C.I.R., R.T.O., SIALKOT VS MUHAMMAD KHALID SETHI, Prop: New Hafiz Cloth House, Sialkot Cantt. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113A, 114, 122(1), 122(5), 122(9) | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Taxpayer/an individual, who derived income by running a cloth shop, filed return of income under S.113-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, instead of filing regular return of income under S.114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Assessing Read More... |
2016 PTD 1758 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Messrs ENGLISH SHOES (PVT.) LTD. VS The COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax /WEALTH TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 62(1),133(5),136 | Declared income, rejection of;Non-issuance of notice |
Reference---Declared income, rejection of---Non-issuance of notice---Income Tax officer rejected declared income by taxpayer and estimated higher income without issuing notice under S.62 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Validity---Mandatory notice under proviso to Read More... |
2016 PTD 2422 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION)
VS ATLAS INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), 2(7), 133--- ---5(b) & (c)Notification SRO No. 585(I)/86 dated 13-07-1987 | Banking Company; Investment Bank |
Reference---“Banking Company” and “Investment Bank”---Distinguished---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal did not hold assesse company as Banking company for income tax purpose and made it liable to be taxed as public company---Validity---In order to qualify as a Read More... |
2016 PTD 2426 (2016)113 TAX 261 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
Syed WAQAR HAYDER ZAIDI through Authorized person VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Chairman and 6 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 129(4) | Decision in appeal |
Decision in appeal---Order passed in appeal beyond the prescribed statutory period---Effect---Plaintiff contended that impugned order, having been passed beyond the statutory period in terms of S. 129(4) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, was Read More... |
2016 PTD 1783 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
Syed WAQAR HAYDER ZAIDI through Authorized person VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Chairman and 6 others |
Interpretation of statues | Time limit prescribed in provision |
Time limit prescribed in provision---Effect---Provision, wherein, some time limit was provided for performing an act and no consequence for such failure was provided, had always been termed as “directory” and not mandatory, and if a provision was directory in Read More... |
2016 PTD 1783 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
BISMA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE through Chief Executive VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division Chairman and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 221 | Rectification, powers of |
Rectification, powers of---Scope---Assesse assailed notices on the ground that income tax officer had no powers to rectify assessment order in original---Objection raised by authorities was that the petition under Art. 199 of the Constitution was not Read More... |
2016 PTD 1790 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
BISMA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE through Chief Executive VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division Chairman and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 221 | Constitutional petition |
Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Notices issued to the petitioner were not legally justified, constitutional petition in the matter was Read More... |
2016 PTD 1790 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
Messrs CHICAGO METAL WORKS
VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 214(4) | Non-issuance of tax refund |
Maladministration---Non-issuance of tax refund---Giving effect to Appellate Courts which it was bound under the law to do so and consequently it had not issued the entire amount of refund due and illegally withheld part thereof, particularly pertaining to Workers’ Read More... |
2016 PTD 1797 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
Messrs HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 122(5A), 140 | Coercive measures; Attaching of Bank accounts |
Coercive measures---Attaching of Bank accounts---Show cause notice was issued to assesse for amendment in assessment order, which notice was assailed before High Court in constitutional petition---During the pendency of petition before High Court, authorities Read More... |
2016 PTD 1799 (2017)116 TAX 469 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI VS EFU LIFE ASSURANCE, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 131, 221 | Rectification of order; Non-appearance of applicant on date of hearing |
Rectification of order---Application for---Non-appearance of applicant on date of hearing---Applicant/department, filed applications for seeking rectification in the earlier order, passed by the Division Bench of the Tribunal, whereby the appeals of the Read More... |
2016 PTD 1805 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
KHALID MANSOOR VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 37A, 37A(2), 100B, First Sched., Part I, Div. VII, Eighth Sched | Capital gain on disposal of securities |
Capital gain on disposal of securities---‘Holding period’, absence of---Effect---Term ‘security’, as used in S. 37-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; meant shares of a listed company (as defined under S.2(47) of the Ordinance)---Company in question was not a Read More... |
2016 PTD 1813 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
KHALID MANSOOR VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 37A, 37A(2), 100B, First Sched., Part I, Div. VII, Eighth Sched | Capital gain on disposal of securities |
Capital gain on disposal of securities---Literal interpretation, rule of---Applicability---‘Holding period’---Determination---Section 37-A(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 has to be applied literally and the ‘holding period’ has to be determined Read More... |
2016 PTD 1813 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
AMTEX LIMITED KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), R.T.O., FAISALABAD and another |
Administration of justice | Past and closed transaction |
Past and closed transaction, could not be re-opened especially when a beneficiary had no role in the irregularity committed by the other Read More... |
2015 PTD 1174 2016 PTCL 630 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
KHALID MANSOOR VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 37A, 37A(2), 100B, First Sched., Part I, Div. VII, Eighth Sched | Capital gain on disposal of securities |
Capital gain on disposal of securities---Condition---‘Securities’---Definition and scope---‘Holding period’, absence of---Effect---Section 37-A(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 determines the ‘holding period’, which in turn determines the rate to be Read More... |
2016 PTD 1813 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
KHALID MANSOOR VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 37A, 37A(2), 100B, First Sched., Part I, Div. VII, Eighth Sched | Rate of tax on capital gain |
Capital gain on disposal of securities---Rate of tax on capital gain---Determination---Under S. 37-A(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, tax on any capital gain is to be levied at the rates specified in Division VII of Part I of the First Schedule of Income Tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 1813 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
KHALID MANSOOR VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 37A, 37A(2), 100B, First Sched., Part I, Div. VII, Eighth Sched | Capital gain on disposal of securities |
Capital gain on disposal of securities---Principles---Section 37-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is a charging provision, as the same imposes tax on capital gain made on the disposal of securities---Charging provision is to be construed strictly and literally and in Read More... |
2016 PTD 1813 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
C.I.R., ZONE-III, RTO, FAISALABAD VS DRAZ RICE MILLS, KOT KHAIRA, JHANG |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, 113, 221 & Second Schedule, Part III, Cl.13 | Payment of minimum tax |
Payment of minimum tax---Reduction in rate---Rectification of deemed assessment---Return of income by taxpayer, for tax year 2011, declaring sales/turnover---Department as per provisions contained in S.113 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, found that taxpayer was Read More... |
2016 PTD 1820 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, MEPCO COMPLEX, KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN
VS COMMISSIONER (IR), ZONE-II, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(19), 2(35), 2(46), 3(1)(a), 13, 46 | Treating government subsidy as taxable income |
Scope of sales tax---Treating government subsidy as taxable income---Appellant, a public limited company, was engaged in business of distribution and supply of electricity after purchasing from National Transmission and Distribution Company---Adjudicating Authority Read More... |
2016 PTD 1829 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LTD. through Senior Manager Finance VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- ---Constitution of Pakistan 122(5A)--- Art. 199 | Amendment of assessment, retrospective effect |
Constitutional petition---Show cause notice---Amendment of assessment, retrospective effect---Scope---Assessee was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by Income Tax authorities whereby original assessment order was amended after five Read More... |
2016 PTD 1872 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LTD. through Senior Manager Finance VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Interpretation of statutes | Retrospective effect |
Retrospective effect---Scope---Procedural law applies retroactively unless contrary is provided in law itself---In the procedure, nobody had vested right and if some change made in original law prescribing some procedure it has to be read as if it was always part of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1872 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.-II
VS Messrs PEARL PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI |
income tax | Presumptive against the bonafide |
Presumptive against the bonafide or the honesty of assesse/taxpayer---Taxpayer, could not be presumed to be dishonest---No presumption, was against the bona fide or the honesty of the assesse---Normally, the Income Tax Authorities, would not be justified in refusing Read More... |
2016 PTD 1877 (2016)114 TAX 116 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
Waheed Shahzad Butt VS The Federation of Pakistan and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 134A | ADRC |
The principles propounded in the above judgments very much underlie the objects for which FOI Ordinance was promulgated. The application by the petitioner was not responded to by the Board contrary to the command of the FOI Ordinance, which prompted him to approach Read More... |
(2016)113 TAX 160 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, RTO VS Messrs TALHA TEXTILE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 114, 133, 120 & 122(1)(5-A)(9) | Amendment of assessment---Charging of turnover minimum tax |
Amendment of assessment---Charging of turnover minimum tax---Taxpayer filed return of total income for the years 2011 & 2012, and case of the taxpayer was selected for audit, and deemed assessment was amended by Assessing Authority---Discrepancy on scrutiny, Read More... |
2016 PTD 1908 |
|
Supreme Court of UK | 2016 |
COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY€™S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS VS UBS AG and another |
Purposive construction of provisions of a taxing statute |
Per Lord Reed, JSC: Lord Neuberger (President), Lord Mance, Lord Carnwath & Lord Hodge, JJSC agreeing.--Purposive construction of provisions of a taxing statute---Income tax, avoidance of---Share scheme designed by banks to avoid income tax on Read More... |
2016 PTD 1921 |
||
Supreme Court of UK | 2016 |
COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY€™S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS VS UBS AG and another |
Interpretation of statutes | Purposive approach |
Purposive approach---Modern approach to statutory construction was to have regard to the purpose of a particular provision and interpret its language, so far as possible, in the way which best gave effect to that purpose. ----Fiscal or taxing Read More... |
2016 PTD 1921 |
|
Supreme Court of UK | 2016 |
COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY€™S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS VS UBS AG and another |
Income Tax | Tax avoidance schemes |
Tax avoidance schemes---Meaning and scope---Tax avoidance schemes commonly included elements which had been inserted without any business or commercial purpose but were intended to have the effect removing the transaction from the scope of the charge---Where an Read More... |
2016 PTD 1921 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS VS PAKISTAN ELECTRIC FITTINGS MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)[since repealed] 136 & 137 | Tax authority impugning judgment of High Court |
Judgement of High Court---Scope---Tax authority impugning judgement of High Court by filing ‘petition for leave to appeal’ before the Supreme Court instead of an ‘appeal’(under S. 137 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979)---Maintainability---Contention of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1999 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Haider Industries through its Managing Partner
VS Federation of Pakistan, through its Secretary, Law Division at Islamabad & others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 53, 147, 148 & Second Sched., Part III, Cl. 72-B---SRO No. 717(I)/14 dated 7.8.2014 | Exemptions and tax concessions; Tax collected at import stage |
Exemptions and tax concessions in Cl. 72B Second Sched. Of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Scope---Tax collected at import stage---Nature---Taxpayers were industrial undertakings within the meaning of S.2(29-C) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and importing raw material Read More... |
2016 PTD 2004 (2016)113 TAX 320 2017 PTCL 332 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
Rao IMRAN NASIR Proprietor VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 175, 239D | Power to enter and search premises |
Power to enter and search premises under S.175 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Jurisdiction of Federal Tax Ombudsman---Maladministration---Temporary injunction, grant of---Scope---Contention of complainant, inter alia was that the raid conducted by Department Read More... |
2016 PTD 2037 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
Zone-VIII, RTO-II, Lahore. VS Happy Manufacturing Company, Lahore. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Sales Tax Rules, 8(1)(d), 11(2), 36(1), 46 & 73--- ---R.12(5) | Recovery of tax |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Registered person had claimed/objected illegal input tax on invoices issued by blacklisted unit, which was not admissible in case of registered person under the law---Registered person, was called Read More... |
2016 PTD 2039 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
BURHAN PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Establishment of Officer of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Ss. 229, 230 & 120----Ss. 9, 2(3) & 10 | income tax refund |
Complaint against non-issuance of income tax refund---Jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman in relation to cases of tax refund---Scope---Contention of complainant was income tax refund due to him for various tax years was not being issued due to inaction on part Read More... |
2016 PTD 2054 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
MUGHAL STEEL METALLURGY CORPORATION LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, R.T.O., FAISALABAD Shahbaz Butt for Appellant. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(c), 122(1)(5), 151 & 158 | Amendment of assessment---Additions |
Amendment of assessment---Additions---Assessing Authority made additions under S.21(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, for tax years 2009 and 2010, for the reason that taxpayer had failed to deduct tax while making payments towards re-oiling charges on purchases Read More... |
2016 PTD 2069 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
SHAHSONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN VS The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ------Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Ss. 170, 171----Ss.2(3)(ii) & 10(4) | Non-issuance of income tax refund |
Non-issuance of income tax refund---Complainant, claimed additional payment under S.171 of Income Tax Act, 2001 for delay of payment of tax refund---Representative of the complainant, delivered a copy of letter, claiming that the matter had been fully verified and Read More... |
2016 PTD 2072 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Maple Leaf Cement Factory Ltd.
VS The Federal Board of Revenue & others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---Income Tax Rules, 2002 Ss. 174(3), 165 & 158---R. 44(4) | Statement/records, production of; Tax collected or deducted |
Statements/records, production of---Requirement---Time of deduction of tax---Annual statements of tax collected or deducted---Petitioners challenged the notices issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Enforcement and Collection, whereby, the petitioners had been asked to Read More... |
2016 PTD 2074 2016 PTCL 548 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
PETITIONERS: ABDUL RASHID AMIR VS RESPONDENTS: COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 120, 122(1)(5)(9) & 131 | Amendment of assessment; Bank Account maintained by the taxpayer |
Amendment of assessment---Bank Account maintained by the taxpayer, showed that the bank transactions/credit entries, did not match with declared results; and discrepancies were also observed---Reply to show-cause notice issued to the taxpayer, was rejected being not Read More... |
2016 PTD 2083 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2016 |
PETITIONERS: MESSRS CHICAGO METAL WORKS (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN VS RESPONDENTS: THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 147, 148, 153, 231A, 235, 236, 170, 170(4), 171 | Refund Claim |
Refund---Maladministration---Refund claim was due on account of tax withholdings/payments, but was not settled---Authority stated that verification process had been started and refund voucher would be issued on its completion---Department, had to complete the Read More... |
2016 PTD 2089 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
PRIME COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
VS INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LAHORE, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24, 133 & Cl. 3 of Part IV of the Second Schedule | Deductions not admissible; Allowance of perquisites |
Deductions not admissible---Allowance of perquisites paid by certain corporations ---Interpretation of exemption contained in clause 3 of Part IV of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 ---Question before the High Court was whether the exemption Read More... |
2016 PTD 2091 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
PRIME COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
VS INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LAHORE, ETC. |
Interpretation of statues | Taxing statues; Exemption |
Taxing Statute/Rules---Exemptions---Exemptions, under taxing statutes, should be construed strictly---As a general rule, grant of exemption should be construed in such a way which gives rigid interpretation against assertion of the taxpayer, and in favour of the Read More... |
2016 PTD 2091 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 70, 122(5A) & Seventh Sched: R.6 | Recouped expenditure |
Recouped expenditure---Reversal of provision against other assets on the ground that the amount represented reversal of provisions claimed as deduction in previous years; and constituted recouped expenditures---Taxpayer contended that expense was not claimed for tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.21(c), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. R.6 | Deductions not allowed---Property income |
Deductions not allowed---Property income---Provision against non-performing loans---Sub-standard loans---Surcharge amount---Issues were remanded back to the Assessing Officer as such those were required further adjudication, clarification and evidence to be placed Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.21(c), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. R.6 | Deductions not allowed---Penalty paid to SBP |
---Deductions not allowed---Penalty paid to State Bank of Pakistan---Addition---Validity---Addition was upheld as it was inadmissible under S.21(g) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
LUCKY CEMENT LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, ZONE COMPANIES, CIRCLE5, PESHAWAR |
Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) Ss. 15 to 28 | Constitution of a company; Articles of Association |
Per Mian Saqib Nisar, J. Constitution of a company---Scope---Memorandum of Association---Articles of Association---Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association when read as a whole were the constitution of the company---Memorandum of Read More... |
2015 PTD 2210 (2015) 112 TAX 133 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
LUCKY CEMENT LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, ZONE COMPANIES, CIRCLE5, PESHAWAR |
Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) Ss. 15 to 25 | Memorandum of Association |
Company---Memorandum of Association---Scope---Anything done by a company which was beyond the scope of its Memorandum of Association was ultra vires and thus could not be given any legal sanctity---Company could not engage in a business which was not fairly covered Read More... |
2015 PTD 2210 (2015) 112 TAX 133 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
LUCKY CEMENT LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, ZONE COMPANIES, CIRCLE5, PESHAWAR |
Interpretation of statutes | Prohibitory clause |
Prohibitory clause in a statute, interpretation of---Scope---Under the law of interpretation of statutes, a prohibitory clause, couched in the negative language should be construed and applied strictly---Court should assess and ascertain as to what was the real Read More... |
2015 PTD 2210 (2015) 112 TAX 133 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
LUCKY CEMENT LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, ZONE COMPANIES, CIRCLE5, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) [since repealed]--- Ss. 30(2)(b), 15(d), (f), 22 & 30---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Ss. 15 to 25 | Income from business; income from other sources |
Per Sh. Azmat Saeed and Mushir Alam, JJ. Dissenting with Mian Saqib Nisar, J.[Majority view]-Public limited company---‘Income from business’ or ‘income from other sources’, determination of---Memorandum of Association---Objects of a company, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2210 (2015) 112 TAX 133 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 111, 114, 120, 122 & 177 | Amendment of assessment; Making addition for sales and suppression in sales and production |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition in the income on ground of sales and suppression in sales and production---Return of income for relevant year, declaring income was deemed to be treated as assessment in terms of S.120 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Case of Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 67, 111, 114, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making additions in the income on ground of allocation of incomes |
Amendment of assessment---Making additions in the income on ground of allocation of incomes---Assessing Authority after perusal of the audited accounts and the return of income had observed that taxpayer had earned income from local sales/supplies and export sales, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making additions in income on account of unexplained imports |
Amendment of assessment---Making additions in income on account of unexplained imports---Assessing authority found that there was different of imports declared by the taxpayer vis-à-vis customs data available on the system and made the addition of Rs.68,938,492 Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Addition made on unexplained local purchase |
Amendment of assessment---Addition made in the income on ground of unexplained local purchase---Assessing Authority found that there was difference between local purchases declared in the sales tax/income tax returns---Assessing authority made addition of Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 21(l), 39(3), 28(i), 24(5), 34(5), 111(1)(d), 122(4), 122(5), 122(9), 153, 172(2), 174(2), 177, 214C, 120 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition on loan from Director |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition on loan from Director---As per balance sheet for the year under consideration, loan amounting to Rs.100,000,000, was shown by the taxpayer to have been received from the Director, which was disallowed by the Assessing Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 21, 111, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition on lease finance charges |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition on ground of lease finance charges---Assessing Authority on perusal of audited accounts, had noticed that the taxpayer had claimed expenses of Rs.6,729,332 under the head “Lease finance charges”, which was disallowed Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 24(5), 34(5), 111, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition for not providing aging composition of creditors |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition in the income on the ground that taxpayer had failed to provide aging composition of creditors---Assessing Authority, made addition under S.34(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 at Rs.21,328,199, on the ground that the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 24(5), 34(5), 111, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition for not providing aging composition of creditors |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition in the income on the ground that taxpayer had failed to provide aging composition of creditors---Assessing Authority, made addition under S.34(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 at Rs.21,328,199, on the ground that the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 24(5), 34(5), 111, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition of cash expenses |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition of cash expenses---Assessing Authority, found that the taxpayer had made cash payment to the true of Rs.168,095,667; and expenses so incurred, might have been paid in violation of S.21 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ARMY WELFARE TRUST
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 161, 205 & 152 (5A)---S.R.O. No.586(I)/191 dated 30-6-1991 | Failure to pay tax collected or deducted |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Remand of case for de novo consideration instead of vacating the same---Taxpayer contended that payments made to non-resident on account of ‘hire charges’ (lease) of aircraft which had been exempted from the withholding Read More... |
2015 PTD 1572 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 28(i), 111, 120 & 122 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition on payment of financial charges |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition on account of payment of financial charges---Taxpayer company, availed short term loan facility of Rs.232,495,365 against which it claimed financial charges of Rs.33,959,035, but Assessing Authority curtailed the financial Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 21(c), 111, 120, 122 & 165 | Amendment of assessment---Making addition on account of payment of financial charges |
Amendment of assessment---Making payments under heads “rent, legal and professional charges” etc.---Failure to deduct tax---During the course of re-assessment proceedings, it was found by the Assessing Authority, that the taxpayer company had made payments under Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Tahir Mehmood Advocate Miss Sumaira Khurshid Advocate VS Dr. Javed Iqbal Sheikh, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 111, 120, 122 & 174(2) | Amendment of assessment---Making addition on account of ‘Miscellaneous Expenses |
Amendment of assessment---Making addition on account of ‘Miscellaneous Expenses’---During the course of audit proceedings, it was found by Assessing Authority that the taxpayer company had made payments under the heads “repair and maintenance (Machinery), Read More... |
2015 PTD 2241 (2015)112 TAX 12 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN VS MUHAMMAD ASIF DILSHAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 120, 122 & 131 | Filing of return of income; Amendment of assessment; Unexplained income |
Filing of return of income---Assessment---Amendment of assessment---Unexplained income---Taxpayer filed return of income for relevant year, declaring his business income, which was deemed to be treated as assessment in terms of S.120(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2271 111 TAX 420 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) INLAND REVENUE, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT
VS Messrs SHIELD CORPORATION LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.133 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S.47 Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 196 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 24-A | New plea; Question of law; Speaking orders |
Reference to High Court---New plea---Question of law, non-framing of---Speaking orders---Authorities were aggrieved of finding of Appellate Tribunal and raised new pleas which were not raised before forums below---Validity---No question of law had arisen from the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2275 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ
VS C.I.R., R.T.O.-II, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 120, 122(1)(5), 131 & 132 | Amendment of assessment; Delay in filing appeal |
Filing or return of income---Assessment---Amendment of assessment---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of---Grounds urged by taxpayer for condonation of delay being plausible, appeal was admitted for adjudication---Taxpayer, in the present case, had filed return Read More... |
2015 PTD 2283 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 156-A, 161 & Second Schedule, Part IV, Clauses 46 & 48 | Purchase of raw material Bitumen--- Failure to pay tax collected or deducted |
Purchase of raw material Bitumen---Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Assessing Officer, charged tax under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the ground that purchases in question were not made from the National Refinery and Attock Oil Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 156-A & 161 | Charging tax on purchase |
Charging tax on purchase of POL, Diesel, Lubricants, and LPG gases---Assessing Officer charged tax on purchase of POL, Diesel, Lubricants and LPG Gas---Appellate Authority on appeal remanded the matter to Assessing Officer revisit the case and decide the same Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
PUNJAB BEVERAGES CO. PVT. LTD.
VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE etc. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-Ss. 113(2)(c), 122, 127 & 133--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Alternate remedy |
Constitutional petition---Alternate remedy---Petitioners were income tax assesses who assailed order-in-original without exhausting remedies available under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Validity---Cases filed by petitioners were premature and preemptive as a Read More... |
2015 PTD 2296 (2015) 112 TAX 200 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
SMEC INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-- Ss. 114, 120, 122(5-A) & 131 | Amendment of assessment |
Filing return of income---Assessment---Amendment of assessment---Return of income for relevant year filed by the taxpayer, was accepted as deemed assessment in terms of S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Subsequently, Additional Commissioner, finding that Read More... |
2015 PTD 2324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
SMEC INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, RTO, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 114, 120, 122(5-A), 131, 177 & 214 | Income declared treated as assessment---Selection of case for audit |
Filing return of income---Income declared treated as assessment---Selection of case for audit---Taxpayer filed return of income for relevant year declaring income, which was deemed to be treated as assessment in terms of S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2324 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 53, 159 & 161 | Charging tax on purchases |
Charging tax on purchases made from parties having exemption certificate---Assessing Officer charged tax under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, on the ground that purchase were not made from the parties, which were claimed by the taxpayer being not liable to Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S ISLAM STEEL MILLS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 161 & 160--- Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 50 & 52 | Deduction of tax at source |
Failure to pay tax collected or deducted---Deduction of tax at source---Interpretation of S.161 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Similarity of S. 50(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 with S. 161 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Section 50(4) of the Income Read More... |
2015 PTD 2335 (2015)111 TAX 272 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R., ZONE-VI, R.T.O., LAHORE
VS OMER SHAKEEL |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 116, 120, 122-C & 131 | Ex parte provisional assessment; Unexplained income |
Ex parte provisional assessment---Unexplained income---Assessing Officer proceeded ex parte against the taxpayer and passed provisional assessment, whereby addition amounting to Rs.32,75,000 was made on account of investment made by the taxpayer on purchase of three Read More... |
2015 PTD 2346 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S.161 | Charging tax on Labour wages |
Charging tax on Labour wages---Assessing Officer charged tax on payments made by taxpayer company towards payment, made to daily wage workers---Appellate Authority on appeal remanded the case to Assessing Officer for de novo decision---Validity---When Appellate Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 153 & 161 | Charging tax on cost of crush |
Charging tax on cost of crush, sandstone, stone dust etc.---Assessing Officer charged tax under S.161 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on cost of crush, sandstone, stone dust etc. which action, on appeal, was remanded by Appellate Authority---Contention of taxpayer was Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Ayub Aftab, Advocate, for the Taxpayer VS Sajjad Tasleem, DR, for the Department |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 161 | Charging tax on Laboratory charges |
Charging tax on Laboratory charges---Remand of case---Assessing Officer charged tax under head ‘Laboratory charges’, which action was not approved by Appellate Authority, but instead of deciding the matter, remanded the case to Assessing Officer for de novo Read More... |
2015 PTD 1591 110 TAX 106 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS MUSLIM INSURANCE CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 62, 66 & 66A (repealed ordinance 1979) | Supervisory Jurisdiction |
The instructions/guidelines could not have overriding effect on the statutory provisions of law. The main function under Section 66A is supervisory, in order to ensure that on account of any error, there is no loss of revenue, caused to the Department. To Read More... |
2015 PTD 2624 (2016)113 TAX 216 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS SHAFI SPINNING MILLS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----Ss. 113(2)(c) [as enacted by Finance Act (I of 2009)] & 133 | Minimum tax on income of certain persons---Carry forward and adjustment of excess |
Minimum tax on income of certain persons---Carry forward and adjustment of excess tax under S. 133(2)(c) against tax liability in subsequent years---Amendments in S. 113(2)(c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to apply prospectively---Scope---Question before the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2368 (2015)111 TAX 455 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAWALPINDI VS Messrs SETHI FLOUR MILLS, HASSANABDAL |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Sec,147 of ITO, 2001 Sec. 53 ITO 1979, | Advance Tax |
“The issue in appeals is the charge of additional tax u/s 87 for the years under appeal. The assessing officer passed orders u/s 87 for these years for default of payment of Advance Tax u/s 53. The department’s view point is that there is no time limit specified Read More... |
2015 PTD 394 (2015) 111 TAX 51 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS SHAFI SPINNING MILLS LTD |
Interpretation of statutes | Amendment/repeal |
Amendment/repeal---Effect---Retrospective application of repealed/amended statutes---Scope---Change in substantive law which divested and adversely affected vested rights of parties shall always have prospective application unless by express words of the legislation Read More... |
2015 PTD 2368 (2015)111 TAX 455 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXWEALTH TAX VS Mst. Asma Jilani and Others |
Wealth Tax Act, (XV of 1963) 2(16) | Immoveable property |
Immovable Property: Examination of the above quoted provisions shows that it envisaged only those assets which belonged to assessee on the valuation date. The word “ownership” is consciously not used in this section for the word Read More... |
2015 PTD 2236 (2015) 112 TAX 22 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS SHAFI SPINNING MILLS LTD |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 264--- General Clauses Act (X of 1897) S.6 | Repeal of law |
Repeal of law---Effect---Scope and purpose of Art. 264 of the Constitution---Once a vested right accrued in favour of a party under a statute, and if that statute was subsequently repealed, such right could not be disregarded---Purpose of Art. 264 of the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2368 (2015)111 TAX 455 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXWEALTH TAX VS Mst. Asma Jilani and Others |
Wealth Tax Act, (XV of 1963) 2(16) | AOP, Co-owners |
Immovable Property: Examination of the above quoted provisions shows that it envisaged only those assets which belonged to assessee on the valuation date. The word “ownership” is consciously not used in this section for the word “belonging”. Therefore, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2236 (2015) 112 TAX 22 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 18(2) & 39 | Income from business |
Income from business---Income from other sources---Effect---Section 18(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 deals with business income derived by a “person”---If main source of income fell under S. 18(2) of Income Tax Ordinance 2001, S. 39 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
SULTAN MUHAMMAD KHAN VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 139, 140, 120 | Show cause notices |
In a Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2010, reported as (PLD 2012 S.C. 553), Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has held that right to free trail and due process is to be read as part of every statute; relevant excerpts are reproduced hereunder:- 27). Read More... |
2015 PTD 458 2015 PTCL 450 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 2(46), 80 & 151(3) | Profit on debt; Money was not stock-in-trade |
“Person”---Connotation---Profit on debt---Scope---Department had made restrictive approach by observing that since money was not stock-in-trade, importer was not involved in money lending business like a financial institutions---Department had restricted profit Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
SULTAN MUHAMMAD KHAN VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 139, 140, 120 | Fair Trial |
In a Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2010, reported as (PLD 2012 S.C. 553), Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has held that right to free trail and due process is to be read as part of every statute; relevant excerpts are reproduced hereunder:- 27). law, or Read More... |
2015 PTD 458 2015 PTCL 450 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 18(2), 2(46), 11 & 39 | Income from business and other sources |
Income from business and other sources---Profit on debt---“Person”---Scope---Under S. 18(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, profit on debt was chargeable to tax under head of ‘Income from business’ where person’s main business was to derive such Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS SHAFI SPINNING MILLS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111, 113, 113(2), 113(2)(c), 114, 122(1), 122(5A) | Tax Credit |
9. The net result of aforesaid repeal and amendment in section 113 of the Ordinance is that the period provided for carry forward of the tax credit was five years for tax years 2005 to 2008 and 2011 onward, whereas it was three years for the tax year 2010 and Read More... |
2015 PTD 2368 (2015)111 TAX 455 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 18, 11 & 39 | Income from business and other sources |
Income from business and other sources---Applicability---Where an income could appropriately fall under S. 188 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as business income or any other specific head of income then no resort could be made to S. 39 of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 10 | Total income |
“Total income”---Income liable to be included in total income was chargeable to tax as income under residuary head if it was not chargeable under specific head under which it normally Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 11 and 15 | Heads of income |
---Heads of income---Neither revenue nor taxpayer could claim that an income which clearly fell under one head should be dealt with under a different head---For determining under which head an income would fall, its commercial character was a relevant factor---Time Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 15 | Preamble; Proceedings |
Preamble---Proceedings under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Nature---Applicability of principle of res judicata to income tax proceedings---Scope---Principle of res judicata did not apply in income tax proceedings as in civil proceedings---Each tax year revolved Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ENGRO CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI VS C.I.R., ZONE-I, LTU, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 207 | Decision of Income tax authorities |
Decision of Income tax authorities---Scope---Previous decision of Income Tax Authority will not be a bar where the earlier decision is clearly open to some objection; if it is a decision which is not reached after proper enquiry; if fresh evidence having a material Read More... |
2015 PTD 2375 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs LUCKY HOLDING LTD., PESHAWAR
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)- Ss. 18, 113, 120, 122(5-A), 131, 150, 151, 169 & Second Schedule, Part-I, Clause 103-A | Charging minimum tax on declared dividend income |
Charging minimum tax on declared dividend income and on profit on debt---Exemption, claim for---Taxpayer declared dividend income at Rs.140,262,000 and profit on debt at Rs.2,964,000---Taxpayer claimed exemption on said income under clause 103(A) of Part-I of Second Read More... |
2015 PTD 2427 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs CASTROL PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Accountant
VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Amended assessment order; Show cause notice, assailing of |
Constitutional petition---Amended assessment order---Show cause notice, assailing of---Principle---Assesse was aggrieved of amended assessment orders passed by authorities---Validity---Assesse challenged issuance of show cause notice as well as assessment orders, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2467 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) VS Messrs ASKARI SOVEREIGN CASH FUND, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 131, 132 & 133 | Interim order |
Reference---Maintainability---Interim order---Scope---Income tax authorities were aggrieved of interim order passed by Appellate Tribunal whereby stay order in favour of respondents was confirmed---Validity---In S.133 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, words used were Read More... |
2015 PTD 2477 (2016)114 TAX 191 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
MS. INAM PLASTICS STORE VS C.I.R. R.T.O. SARGODHA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S.111(4)(b) | Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Limitation---Taxpayer contended that order of First Appellate Authority was hit by limitation as provided in subsection (4) of Cl.(b) of S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and once the time begins to run from a specified date it Read More... |
2015 PTD 1614 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Messrs EN EM INDUSTRIES LTD VS The COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL ZONE, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 23(1)(xviii) & 66A | Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Admissible deductions---Taxpayer/assesse impugned order of Commissioner and Appellate Tribunal whereby penal interest/additional mark-up charged by the Financial Corporation for Read More... |
2015 PTD 2498 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE
VS Messrs IDARE-E-KISAN, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 80(2)(b)(v), 113, 114, 120, 131 & 221(2) | Rectification of order by the Appellate Tribunal |
Assesse, an institution registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1980---“Company”---Rectification of order by the Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Returns of income filed by the taxpayer for relevant years, declaring business loss, were treated as assessment Read More... |
2015 PTD 2502 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
M/S. NISHAT (CHUNIAN) LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R. ZONE-II, LTU, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 114, 120, 122, 131 & 177---CBR---Circular No.4(7S)ITP/2009 dated 9-1-2010 | Filing of income tax return under Universal Self-Assessment Scheme |
Filing of income tax return under Universal Self-Assessment Scheme---Selection of case for audit---Amendment of assessment with certain additions---Validity---Return of income filed by taxpayer under Universal Self-Assessment Scheme, was to be treated as assessment Read More... |
2015 PTD 2516 111 TAX 379 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Punjab Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.
VS Commissioner of Income Tax. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 30, 26, 22(a), 11 & Fifth Schedule, Part II chrome-extension://difoiogjjojoaoomphldepapgpbgkhkb/assets/logo-OYJ34ERC.png | Special provisions regarding business of insurance; Profit and gain |
Special provisions regarding business of insurance and production of oil and natural gas and exploration and extraction of other mineral deposits---Terms “profit” and “gain” used under Rr. 1 & 2 of Part II of the Fifth Schedule to the Income Tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 2522 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Punjab Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.
VS Commissioner of Income Tax. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 133 | questions of law; order of Appellate Tribunal |
Reference to High Court---Only those questions of law could be raised for the opinion of the High Court under S. 133 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 which were arising out of order of Appellate Read More... |
2015 PTD 2522 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS SHEIKH MANZOOR AHMAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 122, 120, 114, 176 & 133 | Amendment of assessment/ purchase of vehicle |
Amendment of assessment---Complete return filed under S.114 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to be taken as an “assessment order”---Effect---Return filed taxpayer for the year 2009 attained status of assessment order under S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1771 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, R.T.O.II, KARACHI VS Messrs PAK OASIS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 120, 122, 131, 148, 153 & 169 | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Treating sales of imported plant and machinery and its installation, erection and maintenance as ‘Contractual Receipts’, liable to tax---Taxpayer, a private limited company engaged in the business of imported plant, machinery and its Read More... |
2015 PTD 1618 111 TAX 323 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
GOHAR RICE MILLS, VILLAGE BADWAL, SHAKARGARRH VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SIALKOT. |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ---Ss. 122 & 177 | Amendment of assessment---Selection of case for audit |
Amendment of assessment---Selection of case for audit---Criteria---Interpretation of S.177, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Laying down of criteria for selection of any person of his income tax affairs in terms of subsection (1) of S.177 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1625 (2015) 111 TAX 333 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- S. 65(2) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3) | assessment |
Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider, whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that requirement of S.65(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, could not be fulfilled if administrative Read More... |
2015 PTD 1635 112 TAX 79 2015 PTCL 826 2015 PTCL 826 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY ZONE, ISLAMABAD VS MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss. 15, 17, 32 & 65(2) | Computation of income |
Computation of income---Exceptions---Income from securities and business or profession of assesse, a Bank---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that interest on securities was assessable as ordinary business income and not as a separate head of income under S.17 Read More... |
2015 PTD 1635 112 TAX 79 2015 PTCL 826 2015 PTCL 826 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs WAQAS WOOLEN MILLS (PVT.) LTD., GUJRANWALA VS C.I.R., R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.131 & 132 | Rectification of order |
Rectification of order passed by Appellate Tribunal---Application for---Appeal filed by taxpayer had been dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal, observing that representative of the taxpayer had produced only the ledger account of the parties from whom purchases were Read More... |
2015 PTD 2531 (2015) 111 TAX 356 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
Messrs BAHRIA Town (Pvt.) LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman Federal Board of Revenue |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 177 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Audit, selection for |
Constitutional petition---Audit, selection for---Company maintaining double accounts---Commissioner (Inland Revenue) selected petitioner-company for audit on the basis of a report prepared by an Inquiry Commission on the directions of the Supreme Court---Held, that Read More... |
2015 PTD 1790 2015 PTCL 840 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-IV) VS MESSRS MEDICAIDS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 133(1), 153 & 169(1)(6) | Final Tax Regime; Toll manufacturing receipts |
Final Tax Regime---Toll manufacturing receipts---Concurrent findings of fact by the forums below---Plea raised by authorities was that toll manufacturing receipts by assesse were assessable under Final Tax Regime for being contractual nature and could not be Read More... |
2015 PTD 2533 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ETC. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122, 174, 177(7) & 214C--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Universal self-Assessment scheme |
Constitutional petition---Universal Self-Assessment Scheme---Audit, selection of case---Doctrine of “structuring discretion”---Principle---Grievance of assesses was that they submitted their income tax returns under Universal Self-Assessment Scheme but Read More... |
2015 PTD 2538 (2015)112 TAX 287 2017 PTCL 400 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
MS. BAHRIA TOWN (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 122(5A), 122(9) & 177 ---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Amendment in assessment |
Constitutional petition---Amendment in assessment---Further amendments---Petitioner/taxpayer impugned show-cause notice under Ss. 122(9) & 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 inter alia on the ground that said show-cause notice was for the purpose of Read More... |
2015 PTD 1639. |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
VS Messrs GEOFIZYKA KRAKOW PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 163 & 24---S.R.O. 438(I)/76 dated 6-5-1976 | avoidance of double taxation agreement |
Art. 7(3) of the Avoidance of Double-Taxation Agreement -------Double taxation agreements to prevail over local income tax laws in accordance with S.163 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Interpretation of S. 163 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Question before Read More... |
2015 PTD 1169 (2016) 113 TAX 54 2015 PTCL 818 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
VS Messrs GEOFIZYKA KRAKOW PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Non-obstante clause |
Non-obstante clause---Concept, scope and purpose---Non-obstante clause was usually used in a provision to show the intention of the Legislature that the provision in question should prevail despite anything to the contrary---Purpose of non-obstante clauses was that Read More... |
2015 PTD 1169 (2016) 113 TAX 54 2015 PTCL 818 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs KHYABAN PACKAGES, SAMUNDRI ROAD, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R. (ZONE-III), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 10-A | Fair trail |
‘Fair trial’ and ‘due process’, as fundamental right of a litigant---Under Art.10-A of the Constitution, ‘fair trial’ and ‘due process’ had become a fundamental right of every litigant---Any determination of right of a person falling short of due Read More... |
2015 PTD 1643 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Muzaffar Ali
VS Commissioner of Wealth Tax |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) S.2(m)---Wealth Tax Rules, 1963, R.8 | Debt owed; Advance rent; Liability in wealth tax return |
“Debt owed”---Advance rent---Liability in wealth tax return---Assesse claimed that advance rent received by him for five years was a liability in wealth tax return and sought deduction of amount from his gross wealth---Validity---Advance rent of five years was Read More... |
2015 PTD 2549 (2015) 112 TAX 244 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Mrs. AMINA NAEEM VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- --Ss. 13(1)(aa) & 66A | Un-explained investments; deemed to be income |
Un-explained investments, etc., deemed to be income---Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order under S. 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Tax on unexplained investment in property---Relevant value of property for Read More... |
2015 PTD 1815 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 122 (1), (4), (5) | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Confrontation of audit observations---Definite information---Officer of Inland Revenue was obliged that after formulation of the audit report audit observation/objections/charge sheet, he ought to first confront the contents of the report Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
NOON SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN etc |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 161 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.44(4)--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Notice issuance of; Reconciliation statements |
Constitutional petition---Notice, issuance of---Authorities issued notices to assesses calling upon them to furnish reconciliation statements along with evidence of deduction and payment of tax whenever such deductions or collections were made---Validity---Notices Read More... |
2015 PTD 1653 (2015)112 TAX 46 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 122(5), 122(9) & 177 | Amendment of assessment/ Non-confrontation of audit report |
----Ss. ---Amendment of assessment---Non-confrontation of audit report to taxpayer---Effect---Order was passed under Ss.122(1), 122(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 without confronting the taxpayer the contents of audit repot/charge sheet before invoking the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Messrs PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 8 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122(5A) & 211 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Functions of authorities |
Constitutional Petition---Functions of authorities---Assesse was aggrieved of order passed by Inland Revenue authorities---Validity---Order in question was passed by authorities in ignorance of provisions of S.211 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---High Court set aside Read More... |
2015 PTD 2561 (2014)114 TAX 189 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 111 & 133 | Unexplained income or assets |
Unexplained income or assets---Interpretation of S.111(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as it stood prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 2010---Word “discovered”, meaning and connotation in terms of S.111(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as it Read More... |
2015 PTD 1823 (2015) 112 TAX 403 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) & 122(1) | Audit proceeding under S.177 |
Audit---Purpose---Audit proceeding under S.177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was only a procedure to find out some defects in the accounts and to obtain information to further enter into the jurisdiction under S.122(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE |
Words and phrases | “Discovery”; “Opinion” |
“Discovery”---“Opinion”---Distinction---Legal distinction between the terms “discovery” and “opinion”---Perusal of the word “discovery” would lead to the ineluctable conclusion that the term signifies a stage prior to the formation of an opinion Read More... |
2015 PTD 1823 (2015) 112 TAX 403 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) | Audit--object | 2015 PTD 1242 |
||
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 122 (5A) & 133 (1) | Income year; and Assessment year |
Terms “Income year” and “assessment year”---Amendment, retrospective in nature---Scope---Plea raised by assesse was that amendment made in S. 122(5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, brought substantial change in concept of “income year” and “assessment Read More... |
2015 PTD 2562 (2015) 113 TAX 471 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) | Audit-scope |
Audit---Scope---Section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 did not in itself provide any power to modify assessment or re-determine the income of taxpayer; it was not a return of income which was being processed by the Officer of Inland Revenue, doing Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2015 |
MUJAHID OIL REFINERY (PVT.) LTD VS DIRECTOR I&I INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S. 177--- Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 45 & 46--- Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S. 38--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Universal Assessment Scheme |
Constitutional petition---Universal Assessment Scheme---Selection for audit---Calling of books of accounts---Petitioners were Income Tax Assesses and they were aggrieved of selection of their cases for audit---Validity---Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, had nowhere Read More... |
2015 PTD 2572 (2016)113 TAX 202 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
STAR IMPEX, KARACHI VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another Customs |
General Clauses Act (X of 1897)- S. 24-A | Decision by public functionaries |
Decision by public functionaries---Principles---If any authority, court or tribunal gave findings of fact which were not based on material available on record such findings of fact were illegal, arbitrary, perverse, violative from established principles of Read More... |
2015 PTD 2584 (2016)113 TAX 19 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Asim Zulfiqar Ali, FCA VS Tariq Javid, DR. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 21, 131, 161, 162, 174(3), 177 & 205 | Withholding obligations of taxpayer |
Compliance---Belated orders of Taxation Officer---Effect---Taxation Officer, issued notice to taxpayer to submit necessary details/evidence to show compliance with his withholding obligations regarding tax years 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006---Taxation Officer Read More... |
2015 PTD 1847 110 TAX 183 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
HASEEB WAQAS SUGAR MILLS LTD VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN etc |
Interpretation of statute | Jurisdiction -- scope of the law |
Jurisdiction could not be enlarged or extended beyond the scope of the law, which conferred such jurisdiction---Before a Court could claim to exercise judicial power, it must have jurisdiction, for jurisdiction was the authority of a court to hear a case and hence Read More... |
2015 PTD 1665 111 TAX 221 2016 PTCL 34 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Mst. SHAGUFTA ABDULLAH VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 128 & 131(5) | Undue hardship |
‘Undue hardship’---Proof---Taxpayer must show its absolute inability to pay tax and must establish that under existing financial circumstances his income and expenses do not allow to pay required tax---Not about inability to pay tax or inconvenience to pay the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1855 (2015)112 TAX 270 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS MUSLIM INSURANCE CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----S. 66-A--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 62 & 133 | Original order, revision |
Original order, revision---Inspecting Additional Commissioner---Powers of---Scope---Authorities were aggrieved of the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal whereby order passed under S. 66-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, was Read More... |
2015 PTD 2624 (2016)113 TAX 216 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Asim Zulfiqar Ali, FCA, VS Tariq Javed, DR, |
Income Tax | Opportunity of being heard |
Opportunity of being heard---No advance inference could sustain if a proper opportunity of being head was not allowed to accused and matters which had not been confronted to taxpayer were Read More... |
2015 PTD 2644 (2015)111 TAX 94 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) | Audit-scope |
Audit---Scope---Section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 did not in itself provide any power to modify assessment or re-determine the income of taxpayer; it was not a return of income which was being processed by the Officer of Inland Revenue, doing Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Asim Zulfiqar Ali, FCA, VS Tariq Javed, DR, |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S. 153(1)(b) | Payments for services |
Payments for services---Reduction, scope of---Rebate was reduction against sale consideration and could not be equated with consideration for services simply for the reason that buyers of goods did not render any services to seller---No logical or sustainable basis Read More... |
2015 PTD 2644 (2015)111 TAX 94 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) | Audit---Process of acquiring jurisdiction;--- amended assessment |
Audit---Process of acquiring jurisdiction---Selection of audit or even conducting of audit did not mean or include an assessment or amended assessment/alteration or modification of assessment---Selection of audit and thereafter conducting of audit proceedings was Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
Asim Zulfiqar Ali, FCA, VS Tariq Javed, DR, |
Taxation | Obligations and responsibilities of tax authorities |
Obligations and responsibilities of tax authorities---Appellate Tribunal observed that practice of declaring order of Appellate Authorities per incuriam by Taxation authorities create serious judicial indiscipline---Tax authorities had no lawful mandate to do so as Read More... |
2015 PTD 2644 (2015)111 TAX 94 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 177, 122(5) | Amendment of assessment/ Definite information |
Amendment of assessment---Definite information---Provision of subsection (5) of S.122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 allowed amendment of any assessment only when the department was in possession of definite information and not otherwise, and Officer of Inland Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111 | Unexplained income or assets/ Specific and separate notice |
Unexplained income or assets---Specific and separate notice---Additions had been made without issuing specific and separate notice under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 which was sine qua non and no addition under S.111 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 111 | Unexplained income or assets/ Specific and separate notice |
Unexplained income or assets---No separate notice was issued to the effect that as to under which clause addition was to be made---Validity---Officer of Inland Revenue had not given independent separate notice or disclosed his mind under separate notice as to under Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Administration of Justice | prescribed method for doing a thing |
If the law had prescribed method for doing of a thing in a particular manner, such provision of law was to be followed in letter and spirit and achieving or attaining the objective of performing or doing of a thing in a manner other than provided by law would not be Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Interpretation of statutes | requirement to be fulfilled |
Where the requirement to be fulfilled was given by the statute to be mandatory, failure to comply with such a mandatory requirement of the statute would render the act void ab initio as being an act performed in disregard of the provisions of the statute---Any Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income tax law | Addition |
----Addition---No addition was legally sustainable if mandatory requirements for the same had not been complied Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Interpretation of statue | Legal and valid |
----If the law requires a thing to be done in a particular manner, it would be legal and valid only if it was done in the manner and not Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.177(6) & 122(1) | Audit/ Amendment of assessment |
Audit---Amendment of assessment---Amendment under S.122 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 without fulfilling legal requirement of S.177(6) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was without jurisdiction or in excess of Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.122 | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---“Subject this section”---Connotation---Provision of S.122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 which start with the language “subject to this section” restricts all further proceedings for amendment of an assessment which means that it Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 177 & 122(5) | Audit---Amendment of assessment |
Audit---Amendment of assessment---Once audit proceedings were initiated under S.177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and amendment was required to be made under S.122(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, assumption of jurisdiction under S.122(5) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5), 120 & 111 | Amendment of assessment ---Definite information |
Amendment of assessment---Definite information---Officer of Inland Revenue failed to fulfil pre-requisite requirement under S.122(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and had not brought on record “definite information”---What to speak of “definite Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., R.T.O. HYDERABAD VS DR. MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALMANI |
Taxation | Scope---No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law |
Scope---No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law---Tax could only be imposed by a legislature act and not on executive order, said principle embodies the democratic principle “No taxation without representation”---Law imposing a tax must be Read More... |
2015 PTD 1242 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(1), 122(4), 122(5A) & 120(1) | Amendment of assessment---Further amendment |
Amendment of assessment---Further amendment---Order was annulled by the First Appellate Authority on the ground that assessment order already been amended under S.122(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and the order under S.120(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.21 & 122(5A) | Deductions not allowed---Post-retirement medical benefit---Addition |
Deductions not allowed---Post-retirement medical benefit---Addition---First Appellate deleted the addition---Revenue contended that instead of providing employee-wise detail of expenses an actual basis, the bank (taxpayer) provided total figure worked out by Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 21, 122(5A) & 7th Sched. R.6 | Deductions not allowed---Post-retirement medical benefit |
Deductions not allowed---Post-retirement medical benefit---Addition---Taxpayer (Bank) contended that addition was not maintainable as the same did not come under the ambit of Seventh Schedule; that business income had to be computed under the Seventh Schedule of the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS CHICAGO METAL WORKS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 120, 170 & 171 | Refund, payment of---Procedure; additional refund |
Refund, payment of---Procedure---Dispute was with regard to payment of additional refund---Validity---Word ‘may’ as used in S.171(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, did not make filing of application for refund as optional---Word ‘may’ was used for applying Read More... |
2015 PTD 1913 (2015) 112 TAX 10 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 21, 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. R.6 | Deductions not allowed---Recoveries of amounts ---Additions |
Deductions not allowed---Recoveries of amounts ---Additions---Taxpayer contended that addition on account of recoveries was liable to be deleted as that amount related to the period upto tax year 2007; that income was not liable to tax upto tax year 2007; that the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 21(c), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched: R. 6 | Deductions not allowed---Commutation to employees---Addition |
Deductions not allowed---Commutation to employees---Addition---Assessing Officer observed that “payments were made by the fund itself therefore there seemed no justification in claim of such expense by the company in its account”---Taxpayer contended that it was Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 34(5), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. Rr.1, 2 | Accrual basis accounting--- Un-paid liability of mark-up |
Taxpayer Bank---Un-paid liability of mark-up---Addition---Remand of case for fresh consideration---Taxpayer contended that computation of income had to be made in accordance with the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax ordinance, 1979 from tax year 2009 and onward; Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.21(c), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched: R.6 | Deductions not allowed--Amortization of deferred income |
Deductions not allowed---Amortization of deferred income---Addition---Taxpayer contended that it was grant from Asian Development Bank and grant was not taxable income under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; that apart from this the addition was not maintainable as Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. R.1(c) | Amendment of assessment---Tax-payer a Bank---Provision for Non-Performing Loan |
Amendment of assessment---Tax-payer a Bank---Provision for Non-Performing Loan---Addition---Taxpayer contended that Assessing Officer was informed that the provision had already been added as per computation chart of taxable income and had claimed deduction @ 1% of Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 111, 70, 122(5A) & Seventh Sched. R.9 | Un-explained income or assets---Recouped expenditure |
Un-explained income or assets---Recouped expenditure---Reversal against provision---Assessing Officer had observed through Show Cause Notice that “reversal of provision claimed during previous year stood allowed to the company as deductions against income for Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 122(5A) & Seventh Sched: R.6 | Amendment of assessment---Provision against other assets |
Amendment of assessment---Provision against other assets---Addition was made by the Assessing Officer on the ground that said amount represented reversal of provisions claimed as deduction in previous years and constitutional recouped expenditure---Taxpayer Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTU, ISLAMABAD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 34(3), 122(5A) & Seventh Sched: Rr.1 & 2 | Accrual basis accounting---Impairment loss |
Accrual basis accounting---Impairment loss---Disallowance on the ground that a person shall incur expenditure when it was payable by the person and as per subsection (3) of S.34 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 such amount shall be payable when all events with Read More... |
2015 PTD 1678 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS GAMMON PAKISTAN LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 66-A & 80-C | Re-opening of case |
Re-opening of case---Scope---Authorities were aggrieved or order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal declaring that provisions of S. 66-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, could not be invoked in cases which were covered under S. 80-C of Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1921 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs, CH. MUSHTAQ AND CO., JAIL ROAD, SIALKOT VS C.I.R, R.T.O., SIALKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 113, 114, 120, 122 & 221 | return of income; Assessment---Rectification proceedings |
Filing of return of income---Assessment---Rectification proceedings---Scope---Taxpayer who was deriving income from distribution of products of principal companies, filed return of income for relevant year declaring his income, which was deemed to be treated as an Read More... |
2015 PTD 1926 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs, CH. MUSHTAQ AND CO., JAIL ROAD, SIALKOT VS C.I.R, R.T.O., SIALKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 114(6), 120, 122(3) & 221 | Rejection; rectification of original return |
Revised return of income---Rejection and rectification of original return---Issue for consideration and adjudication was as to whether Adjudicating Authority was justified in rejecting the revised return and rectify the original return in presence of revised Read More... |
2015 PTD 1926 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs, CH. MUSHTAQ AND CO., JAIL ROAD, SIALKOT VS C.I.R, R.T.O., SIALKOT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 113 | Minimum tax---Assesse, a distributor |
Minimum tax---Assesse, a distributor---Issue requiring consideration and adjudication was as to whether commission/margin of profit was amenable to the minimum tax or turnover in the case of a distributor---Marginal profit/commission as “turnover” in case of a Read More... |
2015 PTD 1926 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Second Sched, Part-1, Cl. (74) | Term Deposit |
“Term deposit”---Scope---“Term deposit” generally referred to a saving account or certificate of deposit which paid a fixed rate of profit on maturity of certain date---Funds allocated in such “term deposit” usually could not be withdrawn prior to Read More... |
2015 PTD 2011 (2015) 111 TAX 251 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
VS |
Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971) S. 2(1) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 260 | Industrial establishment |
“Industrial establishment”---Charging of such fund from net profit---According to Art. 260 of the Constitution “electricity” fell within definition of goods and articles produced, therefore, establishment of tax payer company squarely fell within definition Read More... |
2015 PTD 2011 (2015) 111 TAX 251 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
AMMAR STEEL INDUSTRIES, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O. LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 111(1)(b), 114, 121(1)(d), 122(1), 131, 174(2) & 214 | Making addition in income; concealed purchases |
Making addition in income on account of alleged concealed purchases---Selection of case for audit---Amendment of assessment---Failure to issue notices to taxpayer---Taxpayer filed income tax return for relevant year declaring income---Case of taxpayer was selected Read More... |
2015 PTD 2042 (2015)111 TAX 447 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Northern Power Generation Company Limited VS Federation of Pakistan etc. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S. 122(5AA) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Alternate remedy; Show cause notice |
Constitutional petition---Alternate remedy---Show-cause notice---Jurisdiction to issue---Petitioner, an assesse was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by Additional Commissioner---Validity---Where alternate remedy was available, non-exercise of jurisdiction under Read More... |
2015 PTD 2052 (2015)112 TAX 279 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE | 2015 |
C.I.R, ZONE-VIII, R.T.O., LAHORE VS M/S. HAIER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 21(c)(h), (N), 22(13)(a), 122(5-A) & 131, Second Sched., Part III, Clause (8) | Deduction; Depreciation; Amendment of assessment |
Deduction---Depreciation---Amendment of assessment---Respondent/taxpayer company, was distributor of electrical home appliances, manufactured by a manufacturing company---Taxpayer by applying provisions of Cl.(8) of Part III of Second Schedule to Income Tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 2059 (2015)112 TAX 1 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
VS Messrs GEOFIZYKA KRAKOW PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Non-obstante clause |
Non-obstante clause---Effect---Non-obstante clause is usually used in a provision to show intention of Legislature that provision in question should prevail despite anything to the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2067 (2016) 113 TAX 54 2015 PTCL 818 2015 PTD 1169 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD
VS Messrs GEOFIZYKA KRAKOW PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)-- Ss.24(i), 62 & 163 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Avoidance of Double Taxation between Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Polish People’s Republic, Art.7(3)---Notification S.R.O. 430(I)76, dated 6-5-1976---Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement---Income Tax authorities were aggrieved of decision made by Income Tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 2067 (2016) 113 TAX 54 2015 PTCL 818 2015 PTD 1169 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, RAWALPINDI VS Messrs GONDAL CNG STATION, SATELLITE TOWN, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss. 221, 177(4) & 155(5) | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake---Revenue contended that High Court had issued directions for issuance of fresh notice with regard to selection of the case for audit under S.177(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, whereas the Assessing Officer had amended that assessment Read More... |
2014 PTD 589 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, RAWALPINDI VS Messrs GONDAL CNG STATION, SATELLITE TOWN, RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----S.122(5) | Amendment of assessment; Definite information |
Amendment of assessment---Definite information---CNG Filing Station---Formula of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority [OGRA]---Issue as to whether the OGRA formula was a “definite information” or not stood resolved against the department and in favour of the Read More... |
2014 PTD 589 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI VS Messrs ALLIED RENTAL MODARABA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122(5A), 133 (1) & Second Sched., Part-I, Cl. (100) | Reference to High Court; Scope |
Reference to High Court---Scope---Nature of business, determination of---Trading---receipts---Concurrent findings of fact by two forums below---Concurrent findings of fact by two forums below---Controversy related to receipts which were earned by assesse on account Read More... |
2014 PTD 593 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.46---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.III, R.2 | Stay application; Concealed the fact of stay period of 120 days |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application was supported by an affidavit which concealed the fact of stay period of 120 days already granted by the Appellate Tribunal during the pendency of main appeal and failed to disclose the fact of another stay application Read More... |
2014 PTD 604 (2014)109 TAX 177 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rules, 2010--- ----Rr.7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17 & 18 | Filing appeal; Compliance of Rules |
Procedure for filing appeal before Appellate Tribunal---Compliance of Rules---Appellate Tribunal that at the time of receiving of any application or appeal, to examine the documents in the light of observations of present judgment and strictly complied the Rules of Read More... |
2014 PTD 604 (2014)109 TAX 177 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Second Sched: Part-IV, Cl. (57), Ss.113, 120, 122(5A) & 122(9)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 25---CBR Circular No.1 of 2005 dated 5-7-2005 | Large trading house; Minimum tax |
Exemption from specific provisions---Large trading house---Waiver of payment of minimum tax---Revenue contended that exemption in question was available to a new entity fulfilling the requirements of the law and the existing taxpayers fulfilling the said Read More... |
2014 PTD 689 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971)--- ----S. 4 | Workers Welfare Fund |
Mode of payment by, and recovery from, industrial establishment---Deletion of Workers Welfare Fund---First Appellate Authority had followed the precedent set forth by the High Court and followed by the Appellate Tribunal---No exception could be taken to the findings Read More... |
2014 PTD 689 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2014 |
TAXATION OFFICER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX KOTLI A.K VS SAID AKBAR and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S.227---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42 | Dispute as to recovery of income tax |
-Dispute as to recovery of income tax---Bar on jurisdiction of civil courts to adjudicate upon such dispute---Scope---Plaintiff sought declaration to the effect that tax recovery certificate issued to plaintiff be declared null and void---Suit was dismissed by Trial Read More... |
2014 PTD 793 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 53, 70, Second Sched., Part 1, Clause (132) | Rental income |
Business of Electric Power Generation---Rental income---Taxation---Exemption, claim for---Taxpayer who was engaged in business of Power Generation, claimed exemption on rental amount recovered from employees in respect of accommodation facilities provided to Read More... |
2014 PTD 842 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 67 & 122(5-A)--- Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.13 | Non proration/apportionment of common expenditure |
Non proration/apportionment of common expenditure to the income charged to tax---Amendment of assessment---Taxpayer was aggrieved by non-allowing of proportionate common expenditure against income charged to tax by the Additional Commissioner, as required under S.67 Read More... |
2014 PTD 842 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S. 65 | Tax credit, entitlement to---Terms and conditions |
---Tax credit, entitlement to---Terms and conditions as set out in provisions of S.65(a)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for relevant years were adequately met by the taxpayer---First Appellate Authority in the impugned order denied benefit of tax credit to Read More... |
2014 PTD 842 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 18, 72, Second Sched., Part I, Clauses 132 & 176 | Taxation of insurance claim receivable by taxpayer |
Taxation of insurance claim receivable by taxpayer on account of loss of capacity revenue---Taxpayer doing business of power generation was not capable of producing energy because its plant was hit by devastating flood, which made it non-operational---Taxpayer Read More... |
2014 PTD 842 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 18, 22 & 131, Second Sched., Part I, Cl. (132), Part IV, Cl. (11-A)(v)--- | Income from business---Depreciation-- |
---Income from business---Depreciation---Exemption---Department in its appeal failed before Appellate Tribunal had assailed the issues i.e. allowability of expense against interest income; taxation of gain on sale of fixed assets; taxation of Read More... |
2014 PTD 842 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.67 & 122(5A)--- Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), First Sched; Part-IV- Income Tax Rules, 2002, R.13 & 231--- Income Tax Rules, 1982, R.216---S.R.O. 392(I)/2009 dated 19-5-2009---S.R.O. 58(I)/2010 dated 2-1-2010 | Apportionment of deductions---Reasonable basis---Oil Refinery---Exports---Local sale |
---Apportionment of deductions---Reasonable basis---Oil Refinery---Exports---Local sale---Taxpayer contended that reasonable basis, in the present case, would be the nature of activity i.e. processing of Crude Oil and size of activity in reference to input of Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S.67---Income Tax Rules, 2002, Rr.13(3), 231(1)(a) & 231(1)(b)--- | Apportionment of deductions---Computation of export profits |
---Apportionment of deductions---Computation of export profits and tax attributable to export sales---Separate accounts---Separate books of accounts---Taxpayer contended that if separate accounts were maintained then the profit on export business was to be Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax | Accounting |
----Accounting---Without mention of value of goods and sequences, the “account” communicate no meanings---Purpose of accounting was to provide the financial information that is needed for economic decision making---Four fundamental financial statement i.e. Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax | Functional currency---Importance of |
----Functional currency---Importance of---“Functional currency” as a bench work applicable to selling price, transactions with local or foreign markets, cash flow, financing, expenses and other inter-business transactions---“Currency” is universal and sole Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.67 | Apportionment of deductions---“Reasonable”---“ |
---Apportionment of deductions---“Reasonable”---“Reasonable” is a relative term and it donates sound thinking within the bond of common sense possessing the faculty of reason---Reasonability is contingent upon time, acts and aggregate facts---Reasonable Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.67 | Apportionment of deductions---Reasonability |
---Apportionment of deductions---Reasonability demands a method comprehendible to all, a basis having universal application at least upon the cases of identical nature, in accordance with all applicable laws, perpetualeteruality in it and prudently meaningful for Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- S.32 | Method of accounting---Change in |
---Method of accounting---Change in---Taxpayer agitated upon the change in method of accounting not allowed by the First Appellate Authority as the taxpayer failed to obtain the prior approval from the Commissioner---Provision of S.32 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.24 & 25 | Consultancy expenses---Amortization of |
---Consultancy expenses---Amortization of---Consultancy expenses (feasibility study) were amortized by the assessing officer as cost of intangible asset---In the case of any conflict among IAS-38 of S.24 or S.25 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the statutory Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. (LD), L.T.U., Karachi VS Messrs PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED |
Income Tax--- | Re-joinder/rebuttal |
----Re-joinder/rebuttal---Non providing of opportunity to file re-joinder/rebuttal on the comments---First Appellate Authority allowed due opportunity to both the parties and considered it sufficient not to have another round of cross arguments---Plea that further Read More... |
2014 PTD 935 110 TAX 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY (HESCO), HYDERABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 235(1), 235(2) & First Sched. (Part IV)---Interpretation of S.235 | Interpretation of S.235 ---“electricity consumption bill” and the “gross electricity bill |
Interpretation of S.235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Electricity consumption---Distinction between “electricity consumption bill” and the “gross electricity bill”---Question before the High Court was whether advance income tax was to be deducted on Read More... |
2014 PTD 951 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY (HESCO), HYDERABAD |
Interpretation of Statutes--- | Provisions of a statute |
----Provisions of a statute would have to be construed harmoniously so as to advance the purpose of a substantive provision of law and to avoid conflict, and no provision was to be read in isolation---Court was duty bound to attempt to interpret a statute as a whole Read More... |
2014 PTD 951 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOW COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE VS Messrs AYESHA WOOLEN MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----S. 62(1), proviso--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3) | Statutory notice; Defect in books of accounts |
Statutory notice, non-issuance of---Defect in books of accounts---Proof---Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by High Court, whereby trading accounts of assesse were accepted---Validity---No notice as specified under proviso to S. 62(1) of Income Tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 215 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R. ZONE-I, R.T.O., SIALKOT VS Messrs ALBA ENGINEERING COMPANY, DASKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.39(c), 115(4) & 122(1) | Income from other sources---Compensation on delayed refund---Addition--- |
-----Income from other sources---Compensation on delayed refund---Addition---First Appellate Authority asserted that compensation allowed by the department was receipt of capital nature and not chargeable to tax and deleted the addition made on account of Read More... |
2014 PTD 997 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs KOHSAAR DISTRIBUTOR VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE and another |
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--- ----Ss. 194-A & 194-B(2) | Appeal before Appellate Tribunal; Rectification |
Appeal before Appellate Tribunal---Rectification of factual or legal error in order passed by Tribunal---Powers and scope---Tribunal may amend any of its order with a view to rectify and mistake apparent from the record at any time within one year of that Read More... |
2014 PTD 218 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE VS MESSRS SARENA INDUSTRIES AND EMBROIDERY MILLS (PVT.) LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.122 (5A), 113 & 128(5) | Amendment of assessment---Gain on disposal of assets |
---Amendment of assessment---Gain on disposal of assets---Taxation ---Levy of minimum tax on aggregate turnover from all sources---Revenue contended that First Appellate Authority wrongly deleted the addition made on account of taxable gain on disposal of assets and Read More... |
2014 PTD 1007 (2014)109 TAX 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
IMRAN AHMED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law and 3 others |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ---- Arts. 73, 184, 199 & Fourth Schedule, Entry No. 47 | Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax |
Imposition of taxes---Judicial review---Principles---Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax on income of persons, pursuant to Entry No.47 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule to the Constitution and to prescribe tax rates thereon by introducing Read More... |
2014 PTD 225 109 TAX 273 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
IMRAN AHMED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 4, 149 & First Schedule, Serial Nos.4, 5, 6 of Clause 1-A, Division-1, Part-1 [as amended by Finance Act (XVII of 2012)]---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Taxable Salary; Rates of tax |
Constitutional petition---Taxable salary---Rates of tax---Refund of tax---Petitioner was salaried person who was an income tax assesse and his grievance was that table “B” inserted through Finance Act, 2012, in Cl. (1A) of Division-1 of Part-1 of First Schedule Read More... |
2014 PTD 225 109 TAX 273 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs COSLAB (PVT.) LTD., BOSAN ROAD, MULTAN VS C.I.R., ZONE-II, R.T.O. MULTAN |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rules, 2010--- ----R.15---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss.161, 205 & 153--- | order under Ss.161/205 |
----Defective appeals etc.---Assessing authority finalized the order under Ss.161/205 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 by treating the company as taxpayer-in-default---Appeal was rejected by the First Appellate Authority in limine on the ground that the grounds of Read More... |
2014 PTD 1016 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 122 (5A), 120(1), 210 & 2(13) | Amendment of assessment---Jurisdiction---Delegation of power |
---Amendment of assessment---Jurisdiction---Delegation of power---Original assessment was amendment being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue---First Appellate Authority annulled the amended assessment passed under S.122(5A) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 1018 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS KASB CAPITAL LIMITED, KARACHI VS C.I.R., AUDIT DIVISION-I, R.T.O., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 67, 114(4), 120, 122(5A), 210, 210(1A), 211 | Apportionment of deductions---Proportionate basis---Reasonability |
--Apportionment of deductions---Proportionate basis---Reasonability---Taxpayer contended that company was incorporated to undertake the business of money market activities, capital market activities, project finance activities, corporate finance services and general Read More... |
2014 PTD 1024 (2014)109 TAX 195 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
Mst. FARKHANDA FAROOQI VS C.I.R., R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.221 & 121(1) | Best judgment assessment---Application for re-calling of order |
---Rectification of mistakes---Scope---Best judgment assessment---Application for re-calling of order-Taxpayer contended that ex parte order under S.121 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could only be passed where no return had been filed; and Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2014 PTD 1032 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN VS Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN |
Interpretation of statutes-- | Beneficial legislation |
----Beneficial legislation---Retrospective effect of beneficial legislation---Liberal interpretation---Scope---Beneficial legislation, generally, was to be given a liberal interpretation, however for the said legislation to have a retrospective effect, beneficial Read More... |
2014 PTD 320 2014 CLD 272 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN VS Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Second Sched. Part I, Cl. (103B) & S.150 | Deduction of tax at source; Dividends in specie |
Deduction of tax at source---Dividends---Dividends in specie---Conditional exemption on payment of tax on dividends in specie by virtue of Cl.(103B) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Retrospective application of such Read More... |
2014 PTD 320 2014 CLD 272 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN VS Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN |
Words and phrases | Deduct”, meaning of |
“Deduct”, meaning of---Word “deduct” meant to take away money, points, etc. from a total amount; or to take away, separate, or remove, in numbering or estimating, to subtract often with from or out of, and to take away an amount from a total or take away or Read More... |
2014 PTD 320 2014 CLD 272 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN VS Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 150, 156(2) & 233(2) | Deduction of tax at source; Dividends; Dividends in specie |
Deduction of tax at source---Dividends---Dividends in specie---Deduction of tax in terms of S.150, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on payment of dividend in specie---Question before the High Court was whether a company paying dividend in specie to its directors was Read More... |
2014 PTD 320 2014 CLD 272 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Deputy Collector of Customs VS Messrs SIM LIM INTERNATIONAL and another |
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--- ----Ss. 32, 179, 193 & 195 | Assessment order attained finality; Re-opening of past and closed matter |
Mis-declaration---Assessment order attained finality---Re-opening of past and closed matter by customs authorities---Scope---Respondent imported consignments of refrigerants, the same were cleared after payment of leviable taxes and customs duties---After the lapse Read More... |
2014 PTD 330 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
Messrs KURDISTAN TRADING COMPANY (Partnership, firm) through Authorized VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 34(5)(5A), 70, 114, 118, 120(1), 122(9) & Second Sched., Part-IV, Cl. (3A)---BPD Circular 29 of 2002 dated 15-10-2002 | Income from mark-up declared in return |
Income from mark-up declared in return---Exemption claimed on such income vide State Bank Banking Policy Department Circular No. 29 of 2002, dated 15-10-2002---Such exemption declined under S. 70 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 while treated and taxed mark-up as Read More... |
2014 PTD 339 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs PAKISTAN BEVERAGE LTD., KARACHI VS DCIR-09 AUDIT DIVISION-II, LTU |
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)---- Ss. 3, 2(12a), 8, 14 & 19(1)---Federal Excise Rules, 2005, R.43A---Federal Excise General Order No.5 of 2006 dated 5-8-2006 | Levy of duty on franchise fee or royalty |
Duties specified in the First Schedule to be levied---Levy of duty on franchise fee or royalty remitted to principal for using foreign brand name---Taxpayer contended that under new arrangement, it was not required to pay franchise/royalty; and the term Read More... |
2014 PTD 347 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS PARAZELSUS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI VS DCIR AUDIT, UNIT-III AND IV, ZONE-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.221 & 113 | Rectification of mistake---Scope---Minimum tax --- Gross loss--- |
---Rectification of mistake---Scope---Minimum tax on certain transaction---Gross loss---Order under S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was passed to charge tax under S.113 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the declared net turnover---Taxpayer contended that Read More... |
2014 PTD 1064 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS PARAZELSUS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI VS DCIR AUDIT, UNIT-III AND IV, ZONE-II, KARACHI |
Income Tax--- | ---“Gross profit” means gross income |
---“Gross profit”---Meanings of---Expenses---Base line---Illustration---“Gross profit” means gross income as reduced by all the expenses to acquire, produce, procure, convert, manufacturer, import or even the input of human services or machine hours---After Read More... |
2014 PTD 1064 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
Messrs MCB BANK LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 33, 34, 100-A, Sixth Schedule, Part-II, R.4 & Seventh Schedule, R.1 | Tax Accounting |
There is no allegation against the appellant in the show cause notice dated 30.11.2015. In the show cause notice, main contention bone of the prosecution whereas no allegation has been leveling against the appellant. |
2014 PTD 1874 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 3 & 20(1)---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5) | Special law |
Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, a special law, to override other laws---In order to resolve the controversy that “whether the provisions of S.8(5) of the OGRA Ordinance stood overridden by those contained in S.3 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.20---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)-S.8(5)---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.20(1)-- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.54, 20(1) & 3---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5) | Allowable to expenditure |
Gas Development surcharge---Allowable to expenditure---Scope---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 had specifically provided under proviso to subsection (5) of S.8 that when Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 would come into force this expense will be allowed Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)--- | Effect |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 being latter in time---Effect---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 would be reckoned as a special law and Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, even if considered as being later in time, would not disturb or interfere with Oil and Gas Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.20(1) | Expenditure |
Provisions of S.8(5) of the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 unambiguously and without any caveat or qualification treat the amount as ‘expenditure’ for the purpose of tax law, Gas Development Surcharge qualifies to be a deduction under S.20(1) Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.20(1) | Deduction of Gas Development Surchage |
Exemptions and tax provisions in other laws---Deduction of Gas Development Surcharge---Had S.8(5) of the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 been extending any ‘exemption’ from income tax, on the basis of S.54 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------ -S.20(1)--- Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), Ss.8(5) & 43 | Gas Development Surchage |
Allowable deduction---Gas Development Surcharge---Since Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 made a reference to Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 vis-à-vis the allowability of the amount, the intention was manifestly clear---Legislature, while drafting the Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)--- Interpretation of proviso to S.8(5) of the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 | Interpretation of proviso |
Plaint reading of said provisions suggested that these had three components viz (i) creation of very charge of Gas Development Surcharge on licenses (ii) treatment of this amount as ‘expenditure under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and (iii) then came to the Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.60A, 60B & 20(1)---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5) | Workers Welfare Fund |
Workers ‘welfare fund---Workers Participation Fund---Gas Development Surcharge---Not correct to say that Gas Development Surcharge could have only become an allowable deduction if, in line with provisions of Ss.60A & 60B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.20(1)---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5) | Deductions of Gas Development surcharge |
Deductions---Gas Development Surcharge---Deductions of Gas Development surcharge had been provided for in a statute i.e. Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority ordinance, 2002---Contention of revenue that neither any tax could be levied not it could be exempted except Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.49(4) & 20(1)---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)---Constitution of Pakistan Art, 165A | Workers Welfare Fund |
Income of Federal Government Provincial Government and Local Government---Gas Development Surcharge---Deduction---Reference to Art. 165A of the Constitution of Pakistan and S.49(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was misplaced---Deduction of Gas Development Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss.49(4) & 20(1)---Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), S.8(5)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.165A | Workers welfare fund |
Income of Federal Government, Provincial Government, and Local Government---Gas Development Surcharge---Deduction---Reference to Art. 165A of the Constitution of Pakistan and S.49(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was misplaced---Deduction of Gas Development Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax | Profit and loss expenses |
----Profit and loss expenses---Provision for obsolete stores and spares---Claimed deduction was disallowed---Parties agreed that they would be satisfied if the matter was remanded back to concerned Taxation Officer for adjudication afresh in line with the decision Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.2(29C) | Industrial undertaking |
Industrial undertaking---Determination of---Meaning of words given in one statute could not be imported or read into any other statute unless so expressly authorized by the legislature---Whether any entity qualifies to be an ‘industrial undertaking’ for the Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 65B & 2(29C) | Tax credit for investment |
Tax credit for investment---Industrial undertaking---Taxpayer, a Gas distribution company---Not covered under the definition of “industrial undertaking” and not entitled to take tax credit under S.65B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Finding by the Assessing Read More... |
2014 PTD 397 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), MULTAN VS Messrs MULTAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)— ----Ss. 80(2)(b)(v) & 113---Societies Registration Act (XXI of 1860) S.1 | “persons” ---“Company” |
Categories of “persons” under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---“Company” definition of---Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 to mean to be a “company” for the purpose of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Scope---Contention of the Read More... |
2014 PTD 420 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), MULTAN VS Messrs MULTAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MULTAN |
Words and Phrases | ----“Formed”, meaning of---“ |
----“Formed”, meaning of---“Formed” meant to constitute or to come into existence and also meant the set-up, establish, found or bring into Read More... |
2014 PTD 420 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), MULTAN VS Messrs MULTAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MULTAN |
Words and Phrases | ---“By an Act” “under an Act” |
----“Established or constituted by or under the Act” or any other law being in force for the time being---Meaning and connotation---“By an Act” would mean by a provision directly enacted in the statute in question and which gatherable from its express Read More... |
2014 PTD 420 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs SULMAN PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS CIR, ZONE-1, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 8(1)(ca) & 72A---S.R.O. 555(I)/96 dated 1-7-1996---S.R.O. 594(I)/2012 dated 1-6-2012 | Tax credit not allowed |
Tax credit not allowed---Due to detection of certain discrepancies in the record of suppliers of the registered person, the admissible input tax claimed by the registered person was not merely disallowed but demand was created without denying that payment by the Read More... |
2014 PTD 425 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs PAK PANTHER SPINNING MILLS LTD VS The CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss.113 (2)(b) proviso, 120(3), 221 & 205---FBR Circular No.3 of 2009 dated 17-7-2009 | Minimum tax; Gross loss |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Taxpayer contended that since he had declared gross loss before set off of depreciation and other inadmissible expenses, the minimum tax along with default surcharge was not leviable as per proviso to S.113 of the Read More... |
2014 PTD 472 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs PAK PANTHER SPINNING MILLS LTD VS The CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.113 | Minimum tax Expression gross loss |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Expression “gross loss”---Meaning and scope of---Expression “gross loss” had been used in accounting parlance [i.e. generally accepted account principles] where it refers to difference between sales and cost of Read More... |
2014 PTD 472 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs PAK PANTHER SPINNING MILLS LTD VS The CIR, ZONE-III, LTU, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.113 proviso | Minimum Tax Exception--- |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Exception---Legislature, through the proviso, had created an exception with regard to imposition of minimum tax---Under said proviso, such companies which declared “gross loss” could be excused from levy of minimum Read More... |
2014 PTD 472 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.221 & 153 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake---Taxpayer contended that re-adjudication/re-appreciation of facts was beyond the scope of the provisions of S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Validity---Wrong tax calculation may be corrected under S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 153(6)(iii), third proviso, 113, 221 & Second Sched; Part-IV, Cl.79---FBR Circular No.6 of 2009 dated 18-8-2009---FBR Circular No.3 of 2009 dated 17-7-2009---FBR letter C.No.1(25)WHT/2009 dated 26-4-2001 | Corporate sector; Minimum tax liability |
Corporate sector---Payments for goods and services---Minimum tax liability---Taxpayer contented that Taxation Officer erred in applying the third proviso to Cl.(iii) of subsection (6) of S.153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 in case of corporate sector; and that Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----S.153(6) Provisos | Payment for goods and services |
Payments for goods and services---Number of “provisos” had been given with reference to subsection (6) of S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and need to be interpreted under the principles of ‘harmonized’ construction’---‘Proviso’ was generally Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S. 153(6)(iii) provisos | Corporate sector; Normal taxation; Minimum tax |
Payments for goods and services---Corporate sector---Taxation of---Normal taxation---Minimum tax---Proviso to S.153(6)(iii) pertained to the exclusion which was evident from the “placement” of the proviso which related which related exclusively to subsection Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- Ss. 153(6)(iii) & 113 | Minimum tax regime |
Payments for goods and services---Corporate sector---Non corporate sector---‘Minimum tax regime’ introduced through S.153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could not be said to be applicable to ‘corporate sector’ because the minimum tax regime was already in Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 153, 153(1), 153(1)(b), 153(6), 153(6)(iii), 221, third proviso, Second Schedule, Part-IV, Clause 79 | minimum tax regime/corporate sector |
Payments for goods services---‘Provisos’ to Sub-Cl.(iii) of subsection (6) of S.153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Application and relevance of the provisos with regard to “corporate sector” and “non-corporate sector” detailed---In case of corporate Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S.153 (6), provisos---FBR Circular No.3 of 2009 dated 17-7-2009 | Final tax regime |
provisos---FBR Circular No.3 of 2009 dated 17-7-2009---Payments for goods and services---No modification/alteration had been made regarding the scheme of taxation applicable to corporate service providers and amendment only applied to non-corporate service Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ---- S.153(6)(iii), provisos | Final tax regime /Corporate sector |
Federal Board of Revenue Circular No.6 of 2009 dated 18-8-2009---Payments for goods and services---Final tax regime---Understanding expressed in FBR Circular No.6 of 2009 applied only to such service providers which were previously covered in the scope of ‘final Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 113, 153, 153(1), 153(1)(b), 153(6), 153(6)(iii), 221, third proviso, Second Schedule, Part-IV, Clause 79 | Minimum tax |
Payments for goods and services---Corporate sector---Clarification dated 26-4-2011 by Federal Board of Revenue could be read to refer to the amendment exclusively applicable to those services providers which, prior to amendments, were taxable under final tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.153 | Minimum Tax |
Payments for goods and services---Minimum tax---Entire S.153 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was redrafted under Finance Act, 2011 and as such the service sector, comprising both corporate and non-corporate service providers, were brought into a minimum tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 484 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
ASHRAF ENGINEERING CORPORATION and others VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 177(4) & 122(1)(5)---FBR letter C. No. 4(7S)ITP/2009 dated 9-1-2010---Audit---Tax Year 2008 | Audit selection of cases |
Audit---Tax Year 2008---Federal Board of Revenue directed the field formation that random audit selection of cases for tax year 2008 had been held for Audit of Corporate cases and cases of AOP’s and the cases of audit on any other basis for tax year 2008 may be Read More... |
2014 PTD 529 (2014)109 TAX 184 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
ASHRAF ENGINEERING CORPORATION and others VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, LAHORE and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- ----Ss. 177 (4) & 122(1)(5)---FBR letter C. No. 4(7S)ITP/2009 dated 9-1-2010---Audit---Tax year 2008 | Selection of case; Audit |
Audit---Tax year 2008---Taxpayer contended that selection of the case was totally unlawful and unwarranted as the Federal Board of Revenue had directed the Department to close the audit proceedings initiated in respect of tax year 2008 but the department had not Read More... |
2014 PTD 529 (2014)109 TAX 184 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R. (LEGAL) Zone-I, R.T.O., PESHAWAR
VS Messrs GADOON TEXTILE MILLS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-----S.124 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), S.66(1)--- | Re-assessment---Limitation |
Assessment giving effect to an order---Remand of case---Re-assessment---Limitation---Period of limitation of one year after the end of the financial year in which the appellate order served on the Commissioner had been prescribed in the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, Read More... |
2013 PTD 1056 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
Messrs AZGARD NINE LTD.
VS PAKISTAN through Secretary and others |
Workers Welfare Fund Ordinance (XXXVI of 1971)--- Ss. 4, 2(i), 6 & 11B--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 73, 78, 77 & 199 | “Tax" and "Fee", distinction |
Money Bill---Scope---"Tax" and "Fee", distinction---Contributions made to the Workers' Welfare Fund by industrial undertakings were in the nature of a "fee" and not "tax"---Petitioners impugned amendments made in S. 4 of the Workers' Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971 Read More... |
2013 PTD 1030 (2014) 109 TAX 57 2013 PLD 282 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
Messrs AZGARD NINE LTD.
VS PAKISTAN through Secretary and others |
Constitution of Pakistan Arts. 73, 77 & 78 | Tax" and "Fee/ Fiscal legislation |
Fiscal legislation---Money Bill---Interpretation and Scope---"Tax" and "Fee", distinction---"Tax" was a compulsory exaction of money by a public authority for public purposes, whereas a "fee" was a quid pro quo, and a recompense for services rendered---Distinction Read More... |
2013 PTD 1030 (2014) 109 TAX 57 2013 PLD 282 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2013 |
MESSRS BLUE STAR SPINNING MILLS LTD
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS |
Limitation Act (IX of 1908)--- S. 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 188 | Void order---Limitation |
Limitation Act (IX of 1908)---S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 188---Review of Supreme Court ---Void order---Limitation for challenging a void order---Scope---Sales Tax Department passed order-in-original against the petitioner-company---Appeal filed against Read More... |
2013 PTD 1023 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2013 |
MESSRS BLUE STAR SPINNING MILLS LTD
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS |
Limitation Act, 1908 S 3 | Void order |
Void order---Limitation for challenging a void order---Scope---Rule that no limitation ran against a void order was not an inflexible rule---Party could not sleep over to challenge a void order and it was bound to challenge the same within the stipulated/prescribed Read More... |
2013 PTD 1023 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2013 |
MESSRS BLUE STAR SPINNING MILLS LTD
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 188 | Review of Supreme Court |
Review of Supreme Court---Judgment---Scope---Supreme Court in exercise of its review jurisdiction could not sit as a court of appeal against its own Read More... |
2013 PTD 1023 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
MESSRS IGI INSURANCE LIMITED, KARACHI AND ANOTHER
VS C.I.R., AUDIT DIVISION II, L.T.U., KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 2001)--- Ss. 109(1)(a), 99, 67, 177, 122(1), 122(5) & Fourth Sched., Rr. 6A & 5(b) | Recharacterization of income and deductions |
Recharacterization of income and deductions---Insurance business---Exemption of capital gains from sale of shares---Capital gain---Scope---Appreciation of investment---Scope---Taxpayer provided services of general insurance in the spheres of fire, marine, motor as Read More... |
2013 PTD 116 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
MESSRS IGI INSURANCE LIMITED, KARACHI AND ANOTHER
VS C.I.R., AUDIT DIVISION II, L.T.U., KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 2001)------ -Ss.99, 109, 67, 177 & Fourth Sched., Rr.6A & 5(b)--- | Insurance business--- Recharacterization of income |
Insurance business---Taxable income, computation of---Recharacterization of income and deductions---Exemption of capital gains from sale of shares---Application of other provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 in computation of taxable income of an insurance Read More... |
2013 PTD 116 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2013 |
MESSRS SHELL (PAKISTAN) LTD. THROUGH ASSOCIATE LEGAL COUNSEL VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 209, 210, 120, 122 211 & 2(3)--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Amendment in assessment |
Constitutional petition---Amendment in assessment---Delegation of powers and functions of Commissioner Inland Revenue to Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue---Scope and object---Competence of Additional Commissioners to issue notices to taxpayers under S. 122 of Read More... |
2013 PTD 1012 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2013 |
OMV PAKISTAN EXPLORATION
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Ss. 177 [as amended by Finance Act (XVI of 2010)] & 214C--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 25 & 199 | Self-assessment case for selection of tax audit |
Constitutional petition---Self-assessment case for selection of tax audit---Issuance of notice by Commissioner Inland Revenue to petitioner to provide record/books of accounts pertaining to relevant tax year for conducting tax audit---Petitioner's plea was that Read More... |
2013 PTD 1620 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- Ss. 156, 66A & 13(1)(aa) | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake---Scope---Revenue contended that addition was deleted on the ground that same was made without obtaining approval of the Inspecting Additional Commissioner; and since the order under S. 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was passed by the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1656 (2013) 107 TAX 618 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2013 |
OMV PAKISTAN EXPLORATION
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 177 [as amended by Finance Act (XVI of 2010)] & 214C---C onstitution of Pakistan, Arts. 25 & 199 | Self-assessment case for selection of tax audit |
Constitutional petition---Self-assessment case for selection of tax audit---Issuance of notice by Commissioner Inland Revenue to petitioner to provide record/books of accounts pertaining to relevant tax year for conducting tax audit---Petitioner's plea was that Read More... |
2013 PTD 1620 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs PAKISTAN REVENUE AUTOMATION (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 20, 21(e), 122(1), 130, 131, 177 | Deductions not allowed---Contribution to approved gratuity fund |
Deductions not allowed---Contribution to approved gratuity fund---Add back---Taxpayer contended that in financial statements it was mentioned as provision of gratuity and the word "provision" was in fact "payable"; that gratuity fund was an approved fund and under Read More... |
2013 PTD 1173 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs PAKISTAN REVENUE AUTOMATION (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- S. 20 | Deductions not allowed---Contribution to approved gratuity fund |
---Deduction in computing income chargeable under the head "Income from Business"---Salary and wages---Add back---Taxpayer stated that he had duly maintained record of salaries and wages; made payment through cross cheques; that twelve month's complete details of Read More... |
2013 PTD 1173 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs PAKISTAN REVENUE AUTOMATION (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD VS C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------- Ss. 20, 130 & 131 | Deductions | Income from Business |
Deductions in computing income chargeable under the head "Income from Business"---Lease expenses---Add back---Remand of case by the First Appellate Authority---Taxpayer contended that First Appellate Authority could not set aside an issue in view of amended Read More... |
2013 PTD 1173 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2013 |
NORTHERN BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PESHAWAR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--- Ss. 120, 122, 177 [as amended by Finance Act (XVI of 2010)] & 214--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Selection for audit---Self-assessment |
Constitutional petition---Selection for audit---Self-assessment finalized under S. 120 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Notice issued to assessee after more than one year of filing of tax return requiring him to produce record/ documents pertaining to several Read More... |
2013 PTD 1552 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2013 |
WARID TELECOM VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 120, 177 | Self-assessment finalized | Notice under S.177(1) |
Self-assessment finalized under S. 120 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Notice under S.177(1) of Ordinance, 2001 issued to assessee requiring him to produce record/documents pertaining to such assessment for conducting tax audit by Commissioner---Assessee's plea was Read More... |
2013 PTD 1598 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R. (LEGAL), R.T.O., RAWALPINDI VS MOINSONS (PVT.) LTD., RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 115(4), 170, 153(1)(c), 235 & 236 | Rectification of mistake/ Assessment |
Rectification of mistake---Assessment was annulled by the First Appellate Authority---Initiation of fresh assessment proceedings under S.221 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as the department had still limitation to rectify the deemed assessment and which was Read More... |
2013 PTD 1181 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R. (LEGAL), R.T.O., RAWALPINDI VS MOINSONS (PVT.) LTD., RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 115(4), 170, 153(1)(c), 235 & 236 | Execution of contract--- Payment for goods, services and contracts |
Payment for goods, services and contracts---Execution of contract---Final discharge of tax liability---Denial to give credit of tax deducted under Ss.235 and 236 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Taxpayer contended that demand created after denial of adjustment, Read More... |
2013 PTD 1181 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT ZONE-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 111(1)(b), 120, 122(1), 122(5), 122(5A), 122(9), 176, 182, 210 | Amendment of assessments |
Powers of Commissioner, delegation of---Amendment of assessments---Taxpayer contended that orders passed under S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 were deemed to be the order of the Commissioner and powers of revision could not be entrusted to any authority Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT ZONE-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)-- S.122(5A) | Amendment of assessments---Amnesty Scheme---Limitation |
Amendment of assessments---Amnesty Scheme---Limitation---Federal Board of Revenue, Circular No.3 of 2008 dated 1-7-2008---Taxpayer contended that declaration was filed on 30-10-2008 and the limitation provided was one month from the date of receipt of declaration; Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT Zone-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5), 122(5A) & 122(9) | Amendment of assessments---Definite information |
Amendment of assessments---Definite information---Scope---Initiation of proceedings on basis of past and closed information---Taxpayer contended that audit proceedings were illegally initiated on the basis of bank statement obtained from the bank; that Revenue Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN
VS C.I.R., AUDIT Zone-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------ S.122 (5A) | Amendment of assessments---Change of jurisdiction |
Amendment of assessments---Change of jurisdiction---Non-issuance of fresh notice---Taxpayer contended that after change of jurisdiction it was incumbent upon the Deputy Commissioner to issue fresh notice for initiating proceedings; that no fresh notice was issued, Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT ZONE-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss.176, 111(1)(b) & 122(5A)--- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) Art.199 | Notice to obtain information or evidence |
Notice to obtain information or evidence---Income tax proceedings---Qanun-e-Shahadat 1984, applicability of---Taxpayer contended Commissioner only granted permission that only to ascertain a pay order but the Taxation Officer obtained information of bank account for Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT ZONE-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- Ss.176, 111(1)(b) & 122(5A)--- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) Art.199 | ---Un-explained income or assets---Credit entries of Bank |
Un-explained income or assets---Credit entries of Bank, addition of---Taxpayer contended that Taxation officer had taken all the credit entries; instead of picking the peak deposits for making the addition; that entire amount had been taken as unexplained income Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT Zone-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- S.122(5A) | Amendment of assessments---Non-issuance of notice |
Amendment of assessments---Non-issuance of notice under S.122(5) or 122(5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 before passing of such order---Validity---Principle of natural justice would be violated in such circumstances---Where giving of notice was provided for in Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT Zone-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Administration of justice | law requires a thing to be done |
Administration of justice------Where law requires a thing to be done in a particular manner, it would be legal and valid only if it was done in that manner and not Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs MUHAMMAD YASEEN VS C.I.R., AUDIT Zone-III, R.T.O.-III, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- S.122(5A) | Amendment of assessment---Addition |
--Amendment of assessment---Addition---Legality---No addition was legally sustainable if mandatory requirements had not been complied Read More... |
2013 PTD 87 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T. (LEGAL DIVISION), LTU, ISLAMABAD VS Messrs ZHONGXING TELECOM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5A), 148(7) & 153(5)(iii) | Amendment of assessment---Imports---Turnkey contracts---Contractual receipts |
Amendment of assessment---Imports---Turnkey contracts---Contractual receipts---Adjustment of tax deducted at import stage---Taxes paid at the time of import and amount received against contractual receipts were treated as final tax liability on ground that S.148(7) Read More... |
2013 PTD 1165 2013 PTCL 398 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS KHAN CNG AND FILLING STATION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------ Ss. 122(5), 120 & 133 |
High Court Reference---Assessee, a CNG filling station---Amendment of Assessments---Definite information obtained from audit or otherwise---Word otherwise, connotation of---Scope---Any information which is incomplete, or requires further processing, does not Read More... |
2013 PTD 884 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS KHAN CNG AND FILLING STATION AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)------ Ss. 122(5) | Amendment of assessment---Definite information |
Amendment of assessment---Definite information obtained from audit or otherwise---Interpretation---Word otherwise, connotation---Word acquired, connotation---Word otherwise used in S. 122(5) of the Ordinance meant methodology akin or similar to audit, where some Read More... |
2013 PTD 884 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2013 |
KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. through Director Taxation VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others |
Interpretation of statutes | Amendment in law |
Amendment in law---Presumption---When law is amended, it is assumed that a change is intended to be brought Read More... |
2013 PTD 851 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. through Director Taxation VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 161 & 235--- Ss. 42 & 54--- Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2 |
Suit for declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, grant of---Advance income tax, collection of---Concurrent jurisdiction---Second notification---Scope---Plaintiff company was aggrieved of notices issued by defendants for recovery of advance income tax Read More... |
2013 PTD 851 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. through Director Taxation VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others |
Constitution of Pakistan------Art.199 |
Constitutional petition---Adequate and alternate remedy---Scope---Existence of adequate alternate remedy does not bar jurisdiction of High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution but simply Read More... |
2013 PTD 851 |
||
Islamabad High Court | 2013 |
OCEAN PAKISTAN LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, R.11(d) & O.XXXIX, Rr. 1, 2--- Contract Act (IX of 1872), Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 122(5-A), 122(9) & 227(i)--- S.73--- Ss.42 & 54 | Suit for declaration |
Suit for declaration, permanent injunction, damages and set-off---Transfer of working interest and rights in petroleum concession agreement by plaintiff---Show-cause notice issued under S. 122(9) read with S.122(5-A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 demanding from Read More... |
2013 PTD 875 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL) VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS) and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Ss.121(1)(d) & 177 (10) [as prior to amendment vide. Finance Act, (XVI of 2010] & 133 | Best assess-ment |
High Court Reference---Best assessment---Department sought reference of the High Court on the question "whether assessment under S. 121(1)(d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 could be made in cases where deemed assessment order had already been made under S. 120 of Read More... |
2013 PTD 837 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SAEED BUKSH (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5A) & 115 | Amendment of assessment---Statements under S.115 |
Statements under S.115 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 were filed; on examination of accounts, it was observed that cost of sales declared was much more than the sales declared by way of imports; and it was inferred that taxpayer must have made local purchases and Read More... |
2013 PTD 788 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SAEED BUKSH (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 2001)---- Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), S.122 (5A)--- S.66A | Amendment of assessment---Definite information |
Amendment of assessment---Definite information---Enquiries or call for the documents/record---Jurisdiction---Provisions of S.122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 were different from the provisions of S.66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Officer authorized Read More... |
2013 PTD 788 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SAEED BUKSH (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 2001)----- S.122 (5A)--- | Amendment of assessment---Fishy enquiries |
Amendment of assessment---Fishy enquiries---Appellate Tribunal disapproved fishy enquiries for the invocation of S.122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, such approach, if allowed, would result into gross misuse of provisions of law and mere suspicion could not Read More... |
2013 PTD 788 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2013 |
MUHAMMAD AZAM VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 9(2)(b) & 2(3) S.122(1) | Alleged illegal assessment of tax |
Federal Tax Ombudsman, jurisdiction of---Scope---Alleged illegal assessment of tax---Assessing Officer arbitrarily ignoring evidence---Maladministration---Complainant was assessed to tax under S.122(1) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 but contested such assessment on Read More... |
2013 PTD 28 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2013 |
MUHAMMAD AZAM VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 9(2)(b) & 2(3) S.122(1) | Complaint against illegal assessment |
Complaint against illegal assessment and re-assessment of tax---Limitation period---First tax assessment of complainant was dated 29-6-2009---Complainant contested such assessment before Commissioner (appeals) who annulled the same---Tax department filed appeal Read More... |
2013 PTD 28 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2013 |
MUHAMMAD AZAM VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.122(1)--- S.2(3) | Complaint against illegal assessment |
Complaint against illegal assessment and re-assessment of tax---Sources of investment presented by complainant ignored by Assessing Officer---Maladministration---Effect---Complainant, who was the owner of flour mills, was assessed to tax for the Tax Year 2008 under Read More... |
2013 PTD 28 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)-- S. 52 | Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax |
Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Rate of tax---Contention of Revenue was that deduction of tax for turnkey power projects should be at 8% and not 4% in respect of a contract was incorrect---ECC directive as accepted by the Federal Board of Revenue Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 52,50(4),52 | Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax |
Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer of the recipient or the payer---Where original assessment was framed on 15-9-1998 the operative which held the field was 1999 PTD 4037 in terms whereof the jurisdiction under S.52 Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Interpretation of statutes | Procedural and jurisdictional amendments |
Interpretation of statutes-----Procedural and jurisdictional amendments are retrospective in nature, unless and until a statute specifically and expressly specifies so, the procedural/jurisdictional amendment will not apply to transactions which are past and Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Income Tax | Jurisdiction |
Income Tax------Jurisdiction---Jurisdictional defect cannot be cured by any amendment in law, especially where the amendment does not specifically and expressly cure the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)------ Ss. 50(4) & 52 | Jurisdiction |
Deduction of tax at source---Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Amendment by Finance Act, 1999, through an explanation to S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, did not specifically say that same will cure the jurisdictional defect in any Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs HABIBULLAH COASTAL POWER (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, QUETTA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)----- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.8--- S.214 | All Officers to follow the orders of the Federal Board of Revenue |
All Officers to follow the orders of the Federal Board of Revenue---Contention of the department that tax @ 8% was not deducted was misconceived in view of the fact that said matter had been settled through the directions of the Economic Co-ordination Committee and Read More... |
2013 PTD 1070 2013 PTCL 199 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R., Zone-IV, L.T.U., KARACHI VS PAKISTAN STATE OIL LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)----- proviso---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S. 131(5), S.46 (2) | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay of recovery |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay of recovery---Limitation---Departmental Representative contended that Tribunal could grant stay against recovery of tax demand for a period of one hundred and eighty days in aggregate, whereas in the present case one hundred and Read More... |
2013 PTD 1371 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
INTER CONSTRUCT (PVT.) LTD., PESHAWAR VS REGIONAL TAX OFFICER, PESHAWAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---- Ss. 113, 169(2), 11, 122(5A), 122(9), 120, & Second Sched., Part-II, Cl.126-F | Minimum tax |
Minimum tax on the income of certain persons---Exemption---Amendment of assessment---Revised return was filed declaring non-exempt receipts and exempt-receipts with claim of refund as exempt under Cl.126-F of Part-II of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Read More... |
2013 PTD 871 |
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
MUHAMMAD SHARIF ZARGAR, GUJRANWALA VS C.I.R. (APPEALS), GUJRANWALA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Ss. 65 & 13 | Additional assessment---Definite information |
Additional assessment---Definite information---Bank deposits---Estimation of sales---No adverse inference was drawn---Additions---Taxpayer contended that although assessments were reopened on the basis of maintenance of bank accounts, yet, at the end of the day the Read More... |
2013 PTD 10 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, KARACHI VS KARACHI SHIPPING (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.133 | question not raised by applicant |
Reference to High Court-Scope-Reference application involving question not raised by applicant before any forum below---Jurisdiction of High Court to entertain such question---Scope---Such question could not be said to be a question of law arising from impugned Read More... |
2013 PTD 1592 |
|
2013 |
WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT, TAX RESOLUTION SERVICES COMPANY, LAHORE VS CHAIRMAN, F.B.R., and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 S. 216,3,8,10,15,16,17,18 & 19(2) Constitution of Pakistan, Art.19-A | Refusal to provide requested information |
Refusal to provide requested information---Commissioner Inland Revenue refused to provide the requester/complainant information pertaining to specific aspects of the Federal Board of Revenue's working---Commissioner had declined to provide requested information, Read More... |
2013 PTD 1293 |
||
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS MESSRS ZHONGXING TELECOM, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 Ss.122,122(2), & 120 | Amendment of assessment |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---Ss. 122(2) & 120---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.6(c)--- Amendment of assessment---Limitation---Taxpayer contended that assessment stood completed on 2-2-2006 in terms of S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, when Read More... |
2013 PTD 1152 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI VS ACIR-E, AIT (LTU), KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)----Ss. 66A & 62--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.122(5A)--- | Powers of Inspecting [Additional Commissioner |
Powers of Inspecting [Additional Commissioner] to revise Deputy Commissioner's order---Assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98---Limitation---Order under S.62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was passed on 12-11-1998 and limitation expired on 13-11-2002---Proceedings Read More... |
2013 PTD 1140 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs O.G.D.C. (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Fifth Sched., Part-1, R.3--- | Depletion allowance |
Rules for the computation of the profits and gains from the exploration and production of petroleum---Depletion allowance---Depletion allowance could not be given to person who did not own the asset, i.e. oil or gas reserves which were the property of the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1127 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs O.G.D.C. (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax | Re-computation of income |
Re-computation of income---Taxpayer contended that Assessing Officer ignored the directions of the First Appellate Authority and instead of giving credit for taxes already paid, had assessed higher income which was not sustainable under the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1127 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs O.G.D.C. (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax | Arbitration order---Annulment of assessment |
---Arbitration order---Annulment of assessment---Taxpayer contended that the First Appellate Authority directed the Assessing Officer to follow the arbitration order; and the said order was not implemented; and Assessing Officer proceeded to compute income as per Read More... |
2013 PTD 1127 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs O.G.D.C. (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), S. 66A | Amendment of assessment |
--Amendment of assessment---Assessment years 1996-97 to 1998-99---Issue of invoking provision of S.122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 or 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 to the assessments finalized before 30-6-2002 had already been decided by the Supreme Read More... |
2013 PTD 1127 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.T., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs O.G.D.C. (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.122(5A)--- | Amendment of assessment |
Amendment of assessment---Jurisdiction of Additional Commissioner---Taxpayer contended that Additional Commissioner had assumed jurisdiction in the case directly whereas, under the law the requirement was that the Commissioner Inland Revenue should have initiated Read More... |
2013 PTD 1127 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI VS M/S. GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. OF PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 182(1) & 133 | Penalty for failure to furnish a return or statement |
Penalty for failure to furnish a return or statement----Reference to High Court---"Tax payable" meaning of----Penalty under S. 182(1), Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 had been imposed upon the taxpayer which was set aside concurrently inter alia on the ground, that there Read More... |
2013 PTD 387 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
SHAHID ANSARI, Proprietor, United Agencies, Lahore VS C.I.R. (APPEALS-III), LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Ss.122(4)(b), 122(5A), 122(9), 122(3)(b), 177, 114(6) & 120 | Amendment of assessment/Limitation |
Amendment of assessment---Limitation---Return for tax year 2008 was revised on 16-2-2009, when original return had attained the status of order under S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on 30th September, 2008---Notice under S.122(5A) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2013 PTD 547 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
YAWAR BADAT, KARACHI AND ANOTHER VS OIR, U-8 AD-III (RTO), KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.182 | Exemption from penalty and default surcharge |
Exemption from penalty and default surcharge---Penalty was deleted by the First Appellate Authority by holding that the Taxation Officer had not mentioned the sub-clause under which the addition was made---Validity---Appellate Tribunal held that finding of First Read More... |
2013 PTD 1121 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 122(5) | Amendment of assessment---Definite information/Disagreement with Higher Court. |
---Amendment of assessment---Definite information---Pre-requisite for invoking S.122(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 was definite information with regard to escapement or under-assessment of income or assessment at too low a rate or subjection of excessive Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 122(5) & 67 | Amendment of assessment/ disagreement over legal interpretation |
---Amendment of assessment---Mere disagreement over legal interpretation of S.67 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and estimation of life of computer software was not definite information as wrongly assumed by the Department---Invoking of S.122(5) of the Income Tax Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 62 | Assessment on production of accounts, evidence |
Assessment on production of accounts, evidence etc.---Assessee, a Bank---Expenses against income of Azad Kashmir branches---While passing order under Ss. 62/135 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on the directions of Appellate Tribunal, the department taxed bank's Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Third Sched., Rr. 5(1) & 5(2)(b) | Initial depreciation on building |
Initial depreciation on building---Claim of initial depreciation on building was disallowed---Assessee, a Bank, contended that two requirements were that building should be newly erected within the specified dates and that it should be used for the first time for Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 124A | Powers of tax authorities to modify orders |
---Powers of tax authorities to modify orders, etc.---Relief under S. 124A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Assessee, a Bank, contended that in view of S. 124A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the department should have followed the s on the issues---Revenue Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.20 | Income from Business | Provisions for non-performing loans---Bad debts |
---Deductions in computing income chargeable under the head "Income from Business"---Assessee, a Bank---Provisions for non-performing loans---Bad debts, written off---Disallowance---First Appellate Authority observed that "there was no reason for disallowance of the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.20 | Income from Business | Bad debts against provisions |
---Deductions in computing income chargeable under the head "Income from Business"---Assessee, a Bank---Bad debts against provisions---Bank claimed deduction of bad debts against provision for tax years 2003 and 2004 as provisions for bad debt were disallowed in Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 67 & 124A | Apportionment of deductions |
---Apportionment of deductions---Assessee, a Bank---Allocation of expenses against dividend, exempt capital gain and Ijara financing income---Department disallowed expenses by allocating expenses to dividend, exempt capital gain and to ijara income---First Appellate Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S. 61 | Charitable donations/ tax credit of donation |
---Charitable donations---Assessee-Bank claimed tax credit of donation---Department curtailed same by allocating donation to exempt income---Such allocation was confirmed by the First Appellate Authority on the ground that taxpayer's income was being bifurcated Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.24(3) | Intangibles/ Amortization of computer software |
---Intangibles---Assessee, a Bank---Amortization of computer software was claimed in two years---Life of such computer software was adopted as five years---First Appellate Authority restricted amortization to three years---Taxpayer contended that S.24(3) of the Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.24(3) Third Sched | Depreciation |
Depreciation---Assessee, a Bank---Department disallowed 50% depreciation and travelling and motor vehicle expenses on vehicles used by directors and executives for their personal use on the ground that vehicles to that extent were used for deriving income of Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) S.20 | Income from Business |
---Deductions in computing income chargeable under the head "Income from Business"---Assessee, a Bank---Renovation/improvement of lease-hold premises---Expenses for publicity of opening of new branches---Such expenses was disallowed treating them as capital in Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S.32 Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), Ss. 35 & 91 State Bank of Pakistan Act (XXXIII of 1956) Ss.46B & 54A | Method of accounting |
---Method of accounting---Diminution in value of investment---Impairment loss---Taxpayer (Bank) contended that such provisions were made as per Prudential Regulations of State Bank of Pakistan which override income tax law; that such Prudential Regulations were Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 39(1)(cc), 170 & 171 | Income from other sources |
---Income from other sources---Assessee, a Bank---Compensation of delayed refund---Taxation of---Compensation on delayed refund was taxed on the ground that such receipts were revenue in nature---Validity---Legislature had made compensation on delayed refund a Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
BANK AL-HABIB LIMITED, MULTAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) Ss. 171, 120 & 122 | Additional payment for delayed refunds |
---Additional payment for delayed refunds---Assessee, a Bank---Taxpayer applied for compensation of delayed refunds for the period during which order under S.120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 prevailed and starting from three months after the receipt of appeal Read More... |
2013 PTD 1083 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R. (LEGAL) Zone-I, R.T.O., PESHAWAR
VS Messrs GADOON TEXTILE MILLS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---- Third Sched, R.1(3A), Ss. 22, 23, 24, 25 & 62---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 124 & 221---C.B.R. Circular No.23 of 1988 dated 8-11-1988--- | Computation of depreciation allowance |
Computation of depreciation allowance---Un-absorbed depreciation of tax holiday---First Appellate Authority annulled the assessment and directed that un-absorbed depreciation of tax holiday period be adjusted against the income/profits and gains of post holiday Read More... |
2013 PTD 1056 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
C.I.R. (LEGAL) Zone-I, R.T.O., PESHAWAR
VS Messrs GADOON TEXTILE MILLS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S.156 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake---Rejection of application asking rectification on the identical grounds which had been agitated in appeal and rectification asked was of such a nature which could be termed the review or revision of the order---Validity---Order passed by Read More... |
2013 PTD 1056 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2012 |
MESSRS NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS |
Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001) SixthSched | Past & Closed Transaction |
Pir Bakhsh represented by his Legal Heirs and others vs. The Chairman, Allotment Committee and others held as under:- “It is clear from the above that a general decision becomes an authority in like-case and the Judges are bound to follow the same so long as it Read More... |
2012 CLD 1288 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2012 |
MESSRS NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND 2 OTHERS |
Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001) SixthSched | Board Resolution |
Pir Bakhsh represented by his Legal Heirs and others vs. The Chairman, Allotment Committee and others held as under:- “It is clear from the above that a general decision becomes an authority in like-case and the Judges are bound to follow the same so long as it Read More... |
2012 CLD 1288 |
|
2011 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX (LEGAL), REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN VS INTIZAR ALI, PROPRIETOR, MESSRS EAGLE CYCLE AGENCY, MULTAN |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Sec.133(1), Sec.65 & Sec.59 | Definite Information |
Taking instructions from the said guideline in the case before us, in our humble opinion, the provisions of Section 65 ibid are substantial in nature and being penal provisions which will have a direct pecuniary affect on the parties, as such, in the absence of Read More... |
2011 PTD 2435 (2011) 104 TAX 223 2012 PTCL 84 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2010 |
DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY through Secretary
VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 49A 122(1)(5)(5-A) | Local Authority |
And In Messrs Qadri Brothers vs. Assessing Authority (PLD 1969 Karachi 47) as Now, what is a local fund? This term again has a technical meaning when used in any legislative provision. We may refer to the Sind Local Fund Audit Act of Read More... |
2010 PTD 2552 103 TAX 52 2011 PTCL 448 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2009 |
Messrs AIDY VEE & CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Director,
VS TAXATION OFFICER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 137, 127 | STAY |
In case such an application is pending respondent shall not effect the impugned recovery till the application for interim relief or appeal in question is finally decided. The Commissioner Income Tax In case such an application is pending respondent shall not Read More... |
2009 PTD 1715 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2007 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE "A" KARACHI VS Messrs COMBINED INVESTMENT (PVT.) LTD. and 5 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss. 93, 121 & 162---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.9 | Attachment of property/ Misuse of authority |
Attachment or property---Misuse of authority---Civil Court, jurisdiction of---Plaintiff company was owner of the property which was attached by income tax authorities---Plea raised by authorities was that jurisdiction of Civil Court was barred under S. 162 of Income Read More... |
2007 PTD 1981 (2007) 96 TAX 197 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2004 |
M. Akram Tahir, D.R. VS Naveed A. Andrabi |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(9A) & Second Sched.; Part IV, Cl. (59), 136 | deemed income |
---S. 12(9A) & Second Sched. Part IV, CI. (59)----Companies Ordinance (XLVII OF 1984), s. 245----Income deemed to accrue or arise in Read More... |
2004 P T D (Trib.) 1104 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
E.U. Khawaja, C.A. VS Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111 | Penalty for concealment of income/ Mens rea |
Maintenance of accounts on mercantile system of accountancy--Interest on Government securities---Declaration of interest on cash basis. Assessing Officer pointed out that interest on Government securities as declared was less than that Read More... |
2002 PTD 713 (2002)85 TAX 125 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Ahmad Kamal, D.R. VS Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 | Enactment has its own objectives |
Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working under another enactment until and unless the Legislature specifically so directs, Read More... |
2002 PTD 716 (2002)85 TAX 145 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Ahmad Kamal, D.R. VS Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19, 20, 21 | Precedent---Each enactment has its own objectives, philosophy and mechanism and decisions made under it are not binding on the functionaries working u |
Annual Letting Value---(ALV) assessed by Provincial and Taxation Department under Property Tax Act for the purpose of levying property tax was not binding on the Assessing Officer for the purpose of income-tax under Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 716 (2002)85 TAX 145 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai, D.R. VS Abid Sherazi |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,52 | Assessee/Non-cooperative |
Assessment, setting aside of Justification First Appellate Authority was not justified in setting aside the assessments second time when the Read More... |
2002 PTD 333 84 TAX 231 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS Messrs MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 8, 3(1)(x), 4, 5 & 7 | FBR/Apex Authority/no role in quasi-judicial function |
Instructions/directions issued by Central Board of Revenue---Binding on Assessing Officers and all other Tax Authorities performing administrative functions, but not on assessee and Appellate Authorities---Central Board of Revenue is an Read More... |
2002 PTD 720 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R. VS Hassan Naeem, I.T.P. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 143,66-A, 134-B, 156, SOC, 22(c), 80C | Tax on tax |
Income from business of profession Crossing up the receipt of “tax on tax” Department treated the assessee’s tax liability Read More... |
2002 PTD 337 84 TAX 223 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 S.4(3)(vii) & 17,5 Securities and Exchange Ordinance (XVII of 1969), S.14 | Gain from Bank/ Shares of assessee |
Assessee received gain from Bank earned from sale of shares of assessee in pursuance of S.14 of Securities and Exchange Ordinance. 1969-Authority found such receipt to be income Contention of assessee was that such receipt being of Read More... |
2002 PTD 728 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Iqbal Abadan, C.A. VS Dr. Fazal Abrejo, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xv)(ii), 17B, clause (8A) of Part I of Second Schedule | Exemption/ Foreign remittances |
Exemption Assessee had created immovable assets out of foreign remittances received and had claimed exemption- Assets were partially disposed Read More... |
2002 PTD 345 84 TAX 194 = |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs ALNOOR SUGAR MILLS LTD., KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL ZONE B, KARACHI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 4, 4(3)(vii) , 17(5) | Assessment |
Assessment is an order through which the Revenue expresses itself on the income earned by or accrued to an assessee during a particular accounting period-Such an expression is generally based upon the declarations and affirmations made Read More... |
2002 PTD 728 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Sh. Anwar ul Haq VS Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 13(1) (aa), 138E | Penalty for concealment of income |
Penalty for concealment of income etc. Addition Settlement Addition made under S. 13(1) (aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was reduced by Read More... |
2002 PTD 350 84 TAX 178 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND WEALTH TAX, SARGODHA ZONE, SARGODHA VS Messrs IRSHAD ANWAR & CO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(7), 65 & 66âA, 129, 134 | Assessment/ agreement |
Additional assessment---Re-opening of agreed assessment---Agreed assessment though a settlement of contractual nature could not be declared to be a voluntary agreement between the Revenue and assessee fulfilling all the codal Read More... |
2002 PTD 750 85 TAX 470 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Naveed Haider, A.C.A. VS Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 62, 34 | Foreign exchange gain and loss |
Preamble set-off loss Foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gain and loss Assessee showed foreign exchange gains as Read More... |
2002 PTD 358 84 TAX 217 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi VS Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | Appeal to AT/ Grounds of appeal |
Issue raised by the assessee at the Appellate stage without having the same agitated through specific grounds of appeal would not arise out of the orders of both the Authorities below, same could not be raised before the Tribunal in Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
REEM RICE MILL (PVT.) LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Minister of Finance, Revenue Division, Lahore and others |
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 | Salary paid to Directors in cash |
Directors Deductions Admissibility- Salary paid in cash to the Directors of the company was disallowed by the Assessing Officer being not Read More... |
2002 PTD 363 85 TAX 478 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi VS Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | expenses |
----Profit and loss expenses---Disallowance of---History of the case---Relevance---Admissibility of claim of expenses under each head for every year is to be considered independently on the basis of facts available for that Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed VS Nadir Mumtaz Warraich, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 135 , 12(18A) | Rectification of mistake |
Disposal of appeal by the Appellate Tribunal reported case of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal in a reference application Rectification on the Read More... |
2002 PTD 373 84 TAX 235 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Syed Abrar Hussain Naqvi VS Mrs. Iram Adnan, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 62 | Sale promotion and advertisement expenses |
Sale promotion and advertisement expenses --- Five per cent . disallowance of expenses by referring to history of the case without mentioning any other reason was confirmed by the First Appellate Authority --- Validity --- Such Read More... |
2002 PTD 764 85 TAX 256 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ZONE-B, LAHORE VS Makhdoom Zada Syed HASSAN MEHMOOD through Legal Heirs and 81 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , 135, 108 , 115, 117, 122 | Penalty proceedings/ Civil liability |
Income Tax Act of 1922 Ss. 28 & 51 Penalty proceedings Nature Penalty proceedings both under the Income-Tax Act, 1922 or Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 381 85 TAX 499 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif, D.R. VS Javed Iqbal |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 55. 55(2) , (3), 59 | Extension of date for filing of return |
Extension of date for filing of return---Central Board of Revenue could not take away, by issuing a Circular, the powers of extending the date of filing of return vested in the Assessing Officer by S.55(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 769 2002 TAX 140 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
HUMAYOUN KHAN, DIRECTOR MANAKIN TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129 | Pre-condition/ Appeal |
Constitutional petition Pre-condition for filing appeal against assessment order to deposit 15% of the amount of tax assessed Petitioner Read More... |
2002 PTD 385 85 TAX 483 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Mehtab Khan VS Syed Riazuddin |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, 2(1)(16)(ii) | Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner |
Powers of IAC Wealth Tax Officer's order---Net wealth---Liabilities not against any assets created by the assessee---Disallowance of---Inspecting Assistant Commissioner revised the assessment by adding the liabilities on the ground that Read More... |
2002 PTD 773 85 TAX 77 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI VS Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Tax payable/ Basis of assessment |
Payment of tax with return of income “Tax payable on the basis of assessment” Distinction Clear distinction exists between the Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
A. H. Faridi VS Muhammad Umar Farooq, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 20, 19 | Deductions / Income from house property |
Salary and allowances --- Electricity expenses --- Tenant’s burdon borne by the property income and was not a business expenditure --- Salary of electrician was covered by the allownces of repair allowed against the property Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 779 85 TAX 60 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI VS Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Exemption / Claim of exemption |
Exemption-- Additional tax for failure to pay tax Claim of exemption Non-Payment of tax with return Assessment Rejection of exemption Levy of Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Kh. Muhammad Iqbal VS Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Income from other source | Supply of electricity |
Income from other source- Supply of electricity---Interest income on delayed payment of electricity bills---Taxability---Interest income is not to be considered as part and parcel of the business income and its assessment under S.30 of Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI VS Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 54, 88, 111, Second Sched | Penalty Concealment of income |
Penalty Concealment of income Wrong claim of exemption –Effect-- Assessee, on the one hand had been allowed to claim exemption from tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 388 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Kh. Muhammad Iqbal VS Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Exemption provision |
Fiscal statute---Exemption provision---Assessee has to prove himself to be within the four corners of the exemption provisions---Unlike charging provision when an exemption clause is interpreted the doubt is resolved in favour of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD AFZAL VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE II, LAHORE and another |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2, 2(16) ,2(m) | Assessment/ Taking over of the property by Liquadation Board |
Punjab Undesirable Cooperative Societies (Dissolution) Ordinance (XXXI of 1992), Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199 Read More... |
2002 PTD 397 85 TAX 32 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 31 & 23(1)(vii), Second Sched. | Interest paid on borrowed capital payment of electricity bills |
Interest earned on delayed payment of electricity bills---Interest paid on borrowed capital---Deduction of interest Read More... |
2002 PTD 783 85 TAX 196 |
|
Supreme Court (AJ&K) | 2002 |
Messrs QURESHI VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX arid 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 135(8), 136, 137 | Appeal/ time barred |
Appeal before High Court Limitation Appeals filed after more than four years from passing of orders by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Read More... |
2002 PTD 399 85 TAX 397 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., | Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer |
Income From encashment of foreign Exchange Bearer Certificates --- Taxability in the hands of company or registered firm --- Validity --- Amount received on encashment of FEBCs was deemed to be an income under S. 80-B (1) read with S.80 (2) (b)(b) of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 789 85 TAX 112 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi VS Bakhat Zaman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More... |
2002 PTD 794 85 TAX 1 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inaland Revenue | 2002 |
Salman Pasha and-Nadeem Dawoodi VS Bakhat Zaman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 80, 80âB (1) & 80†‘B (2) (bb), 143†‘B, 50(5B), 13, 62, Second Sched., | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Second Sched., cl.(129)--- C.B.R. Circular No.20 of 1998 , dated 8-10-1998 --- Exemption --- words “subject to such conditions as may be specified therein” and where it is so specified” in cl (129), Second Sched. Of Read More... |
2002 PTD 789 85 TAX 112 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 | Best judgment assessment |
Books of account were neither denied nor produced Assessing Officer’s guess work was neither honest nor he relied upon the past history Read More... |
2002 PTD 407 86 TAX 117 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Shaukat Amin, F.C.A. VS Muhammad Asif; D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 14(1) & Second Sched. (129) | Exemption / Subject to conditions |
--- Ss. 156, 14(1) & Second Sched ., cl. (129) --- C.B.R Circular No.20, dated 8-10-1998 --- Rectification application --- Calculation of export rebate --- Inclusion of wealth tax for determining the total income for purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 794 85 TAX 1 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs AYENBEE (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HEADQUARTERS), KARACHI and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 63, 61, 62, 23 | Trading account Rejection |
Refection of accounts Trading account Rejection of claim of profit and loss expenses on account of its being disproportionate to the quantum Read More... |
2002 PTD 407 86 TAX 117 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS ABDUL HAMID |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 15(c), 19 & 136(1), 19 | Income from house property |
Income from “ house property” --- Shop purchased by assesse was being used by his son for business --- Assessee did not disclose income from shop , but Assessing Officer added rental value thereof in his business income --- Read More... |
2002 PTD 798 85 TAX 258 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-II, KARACHI VS Messrs SINDH ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, First Sched.,B(1), 136(2), 65(1)(a)(b), 136 | Re-opening of assessment / Public company |
Re-opening of assessment Assessee was initially assessed as public company entitled to 5% rebate of super tax Subsequently, it transpired Read More... |
2002 PTD 419 85 TAX 386 2002 SCMR 527 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Tax Amnesty. Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), Para. 10(3) ---Words "issued" and "received" in para. 10(3), Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000---Connotation---Word "issued"used in para. 10(3) of the Scheme with respect to Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
Messrs PRIME DAIRIES ICE CREAM LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 137 | Appeal to Supreme Court |
Petition to High Court for declaring the case fit for appeal to Supreme Court Essentials Such petition must contain all the grounds on which such certificate is sought Being an important document, which has to be ultimately treated as Read More... |
2002 PTD 430 85 TAX 509 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000 (C.B.R. Circular No.4, dated 1-3-2000), paras. 8 & 10---C.B.R. Circular No.9 of 2000, dated 31-5-2000, para. 2(c)---C.B.R. Circular No.1 of 2001, dated 29-2-2001, para. 2---Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963), Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD IMRAN KHAN VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 73, 73(3), 138, 73 | Liability of successor |
Succession to business, otherwise than on death Assessment in the name of predecessor Validity Assessment in the name of predecessor was invalid, where the business was carried on by the successor and Return for that very year was also Read More... |
2002 PTD 435 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Tax Amnesty Scheme |
Constitutional petitions challenging. orders of rejection of declarations filed under Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2000-Department's objection was that impugned orders were open to appeal under S. 129 of the Ordinance, thus, Constitutional Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d) | Independent approvals of the IAC |
Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), S.4 (2D) Addition Value of property-- Approval of I.A.C. Two separate and independent approvals of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 439 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
A. REHMAN alias ABDULLAH and another VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 59-D, 13, 129 59-D, 13, 129 | Interpretation of statue |
No provision of a statute should be considered in isolation, until and unless any section/provision thereof is a complete code in itself Any Scheme contained in a statute or subordinate legislation should be considered in totality of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 804 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
DEANS ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED VS INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE NO.1, COMPANY ZONE I, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A | Show-cause notice/ Constitutional petition |
Constitutional petition show-cause notice When Constitutional petition and show cause notice were put in just a position, then it brings the Read More... |
2002 PTD 441 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Mrs. ADEEBA EHSAN VS INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE and 3 others |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 5(1)(xii), 17B | Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order |
Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer’s order Assessment year 1991-92 Validity Section 17B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 enacted Read More... |
2002 PTD 453 87 TAX 32 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2002 |
Messrs POLY PACK (PVT.) LIMITED VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 2(3)(ii), 9(ii)(a) | Non-payment of refund |
Refund to assessee---Maladministration---Department's action of "deliberate withholding or non-payment of refund" was based on irrelevant grounds which fell under the definition of 'maladministration' as per S.2(3)(ii) of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Read More... |
2002 PTD 824 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Asif Bhatti, I.T.P. VS Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134(6), 66A | Interim order is part/ Judicial system |
Interim order Interim order is part of working of judicial system and for that purpose no separate or specific provision is necessary to empower a Court to issue an Interim order Even in the absence of any such specific provision, a Read More... |
2002 PTD 458 85 TAX 11 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
M. A. Hadi, F.C.A. VS Anwar Ali Shah, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66‑A | National Tax Number |
Deemed income---If an assessee was able to prove that the amount paid by him was through cross cheque the other requirements i.e. to intimate the National Tax Number were not to be invoked---Language of relevant law is disjunctive and not Read More... |
2002 PTD 827 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE VS Messrs JINNAH CADET SCHOOL, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 | Admission of additional evidence |
Reference to High Court Admission of additional evidence Nothing had been brought on record to show that objection against the admission of Read More... |
2002 PTD 462 85 TAX 489 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
M. A. Hadi, F.C.A. VS Anwar Ali Shah, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66 | National Tax Number |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner's order---Deemed income---Share deposit money was received through cross cheque---Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the order of Assessing Officer on Read More... |
2002 PTD 827 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE VS Messrs NIRALA (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) | Question of fact |
Reference to High Court /Question of fact --- Question whether the assessee was a manufacture Read More... |
2002 PTD 464 85 TAX 467 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS S. SANKARAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271, 271(1)(c) | Concealment of Income |
Concealment of Income ----Mere addition to Income at the instance of assessee would not warrant a finding of concealment of Income Penalty cannot be levied under S.271 (1)(c) --- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 ,S.271(1) (c) |
2002 PTD 831 241 ITR 825 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
E.M.E. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. through Secretary
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and 4 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(b) | Cooperative Society/ Companies |
Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925), Preamble/Company/Status of Cooperative Society/Societies registered under the provisions of Read More... |
2002 PTD 466 85 TAX 491 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS MATHURANTAKAM COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Business Expenditure / Disallowance |
Business---Expenditure---Disallowance---Expenditure on maintenance of residential accommodation in the nature of a guest house---Effect of S.37(4)---Section 37(4), would cover expenditure on purchase of provisions for giving refreshments Read More... |
2002 PTD 833 241 ITR 817 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
SHREE NIKETAN VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 24 | Property/ Unrealised rent |
---Property --- Deduction --- Unrealised rent ---Institution of legal proceedings against tenant is sufficient---No obligation on assessee to prove decree Notice to tenant to vacate in March, 1972---Suit instituted during previous year. relevant to assessment year Read More... |
2002 PTD 841 82 TAX 336 241 ITR 355 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 19, 20, X1(1) , 154 | Banking company/ Interest on securities |
Rectification of mistake--Purchase and sale of securities in course of business of banking---Securities held as stock-in-trade---Interest paid for broken period on purchase of securities---Deductible as business. |
2002 PTD 848 82 TAX 384 241 ITR 374 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
INSPECTING ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others VS Messrs MICRO PAK (PVT.). LIMITED and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18) | Share deposit money |
Share deposit money---Deeming such sums as "loan" or "advance"---Show-cause notices were issued to assessees on the point that introduction of "share deposit money" over and above the authorised capital otherwise than by crossed cheques Read More... |
2002 PTD 877 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 20(2) | Valuation of property |
Valuation of Read More... |
2002 PTD 882 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS DOONGAJI & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 | Association for promoting the game of cricket |
-Assessee---Association registered under Bombay Public Trusts Act/Granted certificate under S.80G of Income Tax Act as established for Read More... |
2002 PTD 512 250 ITR 750 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS NOVELTY JEWELLERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263 | Items not subject-matter of issue before Commissioner |
Revision---Assessment pursuant to order in revision/Assessing Officer/Whether can make addition of items not subject-matter of issue before Read More... |
2002 PTD 521 250 ITR 781 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS CHOHAN FLYING COACH SERVICES |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 65, 65(2) | Definite information/ reopening of assessment |
Test to determine definite nature of information---Requirements of S.65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.The phrase "definite information" refers to the information, which is sine qua non for the purpose of re-opening. That information Read More... |
2002 PTD 951 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
INCOME-TAX OFFICER and another VS K.L. SRIHARI (HUF) and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 215 | Reassessment/ Interest for delay in filing return |
Reassessment/Fresh order of assessment of entire income of assessee/Effect/Original assessment order gets effaced/Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2002 PTD 522 250 ITR 193 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Khaliq Khatri VS Fahimul Haque, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24 | Deduction/ Office expenses |
Head Office expenses----Assessee a non-resident company----Assessee claimed Head Office expenses in the computation chart and not in the profit and loss account---Admissibility----Assessee was not entitled to claim Head Office expenses Read More... |
2002 PTD 1029 85 TAX 202 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) | Deduction of tax at source |
Assessee in default---Show-cause notice for recovery of advance income-tax not deducted at source---Failure to identify the names of the parties Read More... |
2002 PTD 1 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2002 |
M/s BILZ (PVT.) LTD. VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MULTAN and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(4A), 52, 86 185(3) | Fiscal statute---Interpretation |
Fiscal statute has to be construed in its true perspective and in respect of payment of tax, if it is found due, against a part, then such Read More... |
2002 PTD 1 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | workers’ welfare fund |
---Welfare fund, levy of---Assessing Officer---Jurisdiction---Assessing Officer under S.4 of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS D. RAMASAMY REDDIAR (DECEASED) and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271(1)(c) , 274. | Penalty proceedings |
Concealment of income/Law applicable/Jurisdiction to levy penalty/Penalty proceedings pending before IAC on 31-3-1976/-Effect of omission of subsection (2) of S.274 with effect from 1/1976/-IAC competent to continue with proceedings and Read More... |
2002 PTD 1038 241 ITR 361 82 TAX 280 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of workers’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS N. SWAMY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Income from undisclosed sources |
Income from undisclosed sources--Addition due to difference between value of stock as recorded in books and as found in declaration to bank for getting overdraft/Burden of proof on Revenue/-Could not be discharged by merely referring to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1040 82 TAX 282 241 ITR 363 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of Workers’ Welfare Fund on income exempted under the Sched. II of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Counsel for the assessee conceded Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS N. SWAMY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal |
Acceptance of explanation of assessee by Tribunal-----Question of fact---The assessee’s income is to be assessed by the Income-tax Officer on the basis of the material which is required to be considered for the purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1040 82 TAX 282 241 ITR 363 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Levy of Workers’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS P.A.C. RAMASAMY RAJA EDUCATION CHARITY TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11, 256 (2) | Charitable purposes |
Charitable purposes/Finding that income of trust had been accumulated and that balance had been applied for charitable purposes/Tribunal was justified in granting exemption to charitable trust/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1044 82 TAX 444 241 ITR 416 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS JOHNY JOSEPH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 23 | Property Annual letting value |
Annual letting value/Basis for determination/Law applicable/-Effect of amendment of S.23 in 1975/-Actual rent will be deemed to be annual value if it is in excess of sum for which property might reasonably be expected to be let/-Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1049 82 TAX 462 241 ITR 423 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Workers’ Welfare Fund |
Workers’ Welfare Fund---Determination of---Assessing Officer under S.4(4) of the Workers’ Welfare Fund Ordinance, 1971, is under Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 | Property/Let out to an associate |
Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More... |
2002 PTD 1052 82 TAX 459 241 ITR 420 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs KAMRAN MODEL FACTORY |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 34, 35, 55, 80C, 80 CC, 129, 134, 156 | Duties/ obligations |
---Duties/obligations Read More... |
2002 PTD 14 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR & SONS LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 22, 256 | Property/Let out to an associate |
Property/Finding that large building had been let out to an associate company on a very low rent/Tribunal justified in remanding matter for determination of reasonable rent/No question of law arose/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 22 Read More... |
2002 PTD 1052 82 TAX 459 241 ITR 420 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs HAMEED MASOOD LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE; LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136(2) | Rejection of accounts |
Constitutional Read More... |
2002 PTD 41 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2002 |
G.M. BREWERIES LTD. and another VS UNION OF INDIA and others |
Income Tax Ordinance 131 | Inquiry/ Powers of Income Tax Authorities |
/Powers of Income Tax Authorities under S.131/Condition precedent for exercise of power/Proceedings under Income-Tax Act must be pending/No pending proceedings/No application of mind by ITO/Notice under S.131 was not valid/Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1055 82 TAX 603 241 ITR 446 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 | Permanent establishment / Visit of the expatriates |
Permanent establishment”---Connotation---Term “permanent establishment” denotes a branch, management, factory or other fixed Read More... |
2002 PTD 44 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS GOYAL GASES (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 271 | Penalty Concealment of income |
-Concealment of income/Return income of about twenty five lakhs of rupees enhanced by nearly thirty eight lakhs/Tribunal deleting penalty without applying Expln. 1 to S.271(1)(c) for assessment year 1989-90/Question whether deletion of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1060 82 TAX 611 241 ITR 451 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs UNILEVER P.L.C. U.K. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 163 | Arguments |
Reference---Appeal---Argument neither raised in the grounds of appeal nor arising out of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, has no Read More... |
2002 PTD 44 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
E. PRAHALATHA BABU
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132 | Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme Delay in payment |
---Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997/Delay in payment of tax/Delay not a long one/Declarant having reasonable explanation for Read More... |
2002 PTD 1064 83 TAX 88 241 ITR 457 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Shahid Zaheer, D.R. VS Shahid Abbas |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 23 | value of lands and buildings |
Determination of value of land and building with fixtures and fittings---Principles---Rule 8(3) of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 prescribes the Read More... |
2002 PTD 54 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS KASTHURI & SONS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
Interest on borrowed capital/Assessee borrowing money for purpose of setting up a printing facsimile unit/-Interest paid allowable as revenue expenditure/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2002 PTD 1070 241 ITR 412 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally VS Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Economic Reforms Act/ Foreign currency account |
Foreign currency account in Pakistan---Exemption---allowed in respect of foreign currency account in Pakistan from the charge of wealth tax by Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Pronote providing for payment interest |
Income/Pronote seized during search operations/-Pronote providing for payment interest/-Evidence from books of account of M that such interest had been paid to assessee/-Interest was assessable as income of assessee/Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1072 241 ITR 464 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally VS Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts |
Immunity granted to Foreign Currency Accounts---Intention of Legislature---By enacting subsection (2) of S.5, Protection of Economic Reforms Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUTHERN SHIPPING CO. (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | payment of interest |
Held, that the pronote stipulated payment of interest. The entries in the account books of M in the normal course of business revealed the payment of interest of Rs.67,790 to the assessee-company. The mere fact that the correct Read More... |
2002 PTD 1072 241 ITR 464 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally VS Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Interpretation of statutes/ favour of the assessee. |
---Fiscal statutes to be strictly interpreted and in case of substantial deficiencies in the wordings, such statute is to be interpreted Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
VOLTAS LTD. (formerly Hyderabad Allwayn Ltd.)
VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Delay/to be condoned |
Delay of 26 days in filing application---Section 256 allows condonation of delay up to 30 days after time limit/Provision for condonation of delay to be liberally construed/Finding that delay was due to mistake of counsel/Delay condoned/-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1076 82 TAX 593 241 ITR 471 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
G. A. Jally VS Dr. Ikram Ghani, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(m), 5, Second Schedule, 3 | Registration of firms |
“The amendment made in subsection (1) clarifies that the instrument of partnership shall be in writing. Subsection (4) has also been Read More... |
2002 PTD 58 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS KARNATAKA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 | Cooperative society/Special deduction |
Cooperative society/Special deduction/Scope of Cooperative society engaged in banking business/Interest arising from investment made out of reserve fund to enable it to carry on banking business/-Is income from banking Read More... |
2002 PTD 1079 251 ITR 194 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
K.P. MADHUSUDHANAN
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 143, 271 | Penalty Concealment of income |
Deemed concealment under Explanation/Notice for imposition of penalty--Specific reference to Explanation dealing with deemed concealment not necessary/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.271(1)(c). Expln. 1. cl. (B)-[ CIT, v. P.M. Shah (1993) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1082 251 ITR 99 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
INCOME TAX OFFICER
VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(7), (28A), 194A, 201, 240, 244(lA), (3) & 244A. | Interest paid to buyers for period of delay |
Development Authority constructing flats and allotting them to buyers/Interest paid to buyers for period of delay/Failure to deduct tax at source/Notice of demand for tax and recovery.--Development Authority an "assessee"- Appellate Read More... |
2002 PTD 1088 251 ITR 772 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
KHODEY BREWING AND DISTILLING INDUSTRIES LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Income-tax | Interest/Delay in filing return |
Interest----Delay in filing return----Deficiency in paying advance tax-----Assessment order Direction for charging interest for delay and Read More... |
2002 PTD 524 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS STELLER INVESTMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (2) | Black money into white |
Subscribed capital/Increase/Tribunal finding not a device for converting black money into white with the being of investment company/No question of law arises -Indian Income Tu Act, 1961, S.256(2). |
2002 PTD 1094 261 ITR 263 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
GANGABAI CHARITIES VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth tax | Exemption/ Charitable trust |
Purpose not confined to religious or chartiable use----Property could be used for social, cultural and allied purposes at sole discretion of Read More... |
2002 PTD 526 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS RAJARAM MAIZE PRODUCTS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28 | Subsidy to new industries |
The respondent-firm, which manufactured starch, liquid glucose and cattle feed, started a new unit for manufacture and sale of dextro mono hydrate. It received power subsidy from the State of M.P. under a scheme whereunder subsidy was Read More... |
2002 PTD 1095 251 ITR 427 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
M.R.M. PLANTATIONS (P) LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104 | Company/ Undistributed profits |
Undistributed profits----Additional tax----Investment company---sale of house properties and rubber plantation----Profits from sale brought Read More... |
2002 PTD 527 250 ITR 521 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
STAR PAPER MILLS LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Tax deduction |
Business expenditure--Royalty payable to State Government-State > Government having unilateral power to fix royalty:-Dispute regarding enhancement of royalty and lack of entry in accounts-Not relevant Enhanced royalty is a Read More... |
2002 PTD 1096 252 ITR 337 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MIAN CONTRACTORS, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 136(1) , (2) | gross receipts of the contractor |
Reference to High Court----Question of law----Amount deducted by the Highway Department out of total contract receipt on account of supply of Read More... |
2002 PTD 529 (2001)84 TAX 493 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SRI RAMDAS MOTOR TRANSPORT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 132, 256 | Search and seizure |
Search and seizure/Law applicable/Explanation added with effect from April 1, 1989, enabling examination of person not merely in respect of books, documents or assets found in premises searched/Whether applicable where search conducted Read More... |
2002 PTD 1104 251 ITR 428 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zia Haider Rizvi VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66A(IA), 62, 135 | Cancellation of assessment |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Issue whether the Read More... |
2002 PTD 99 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Haji MEHR DIN VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981 14 | Additional ground |
Grounds which may be taken in appeal----Additional ground----Appellate Tribunal refused to entertain the additional ground for the reason Read More... |
2002 PTD 541 84 TAX 471 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2002 |
MEHSANAN DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80 | Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves |
Cooperative society/Special deduction-Cooperative society engaged in banking business Interest earned from funds utilized for statutory reserves Income from hiring safe deposit vaults-Deductible/ Interest from utilization of voluntary reserves Deductible if funds Read More... |
2002 PTD 1106 251 ITR 522 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Asif VS Muhammad Iqbal Khawaja and Faisal Iqbal Khawaja, C.A. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80D | Turnover tax/ Reserve in balance-sheet |
Turnover tax----Provision for taxation----Reserve in balance-sheet-----Determination----Amount of provision for taxation to be correctly Read More... |
2002 PTD 546 84 TAX 248 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
ARIF NIZAMI
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66-A, 59, 59-A, 62, 63, 64, 129 , 134 | Constitutional petition maintainability |
Constitutional petition---Maintainability--Show-cause notice under S.66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for re-opening of return filed under Self-Assessment Scheme-Contention of assessee was that after filing such return, Authority Read More... |
2002 PTD 1185 85 TAX 330 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Fareed VS Inayatullah Kashani, D.R. |
Law: Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Sections: 54, 66A, 59(1), 134 | Short payment of tax |
Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner's order-Universal Self-Assessment Scheme Assessment year 1999-2000-Short payment of tax-Loss of Revenue Inspecting Additional Commissioner cancelled the assessment order passed under S 59(1) of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1186 85 TAX 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Agha Hidayatullah, D.R. VS Makhdoom Hasamul Haq |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null | Conversion of agricultural land / Sikni-Residential |
Status of land-Conversion of status of land-Conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural Sikni-Residential land-Entries in record of rights/Form VII or Form I-Valuation-Land declared as agricultural land was in the process of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1192 85 TAX 193 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Nemo VS Assessee |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23(1), 30, 80-D, Second Sched., Cl. (118-D) | Interest income |
Interest income earned by the company did not constitute the company’s business income and no expenses, therefore, were allowable under Read More... |
2002 PTD 107 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others VS GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. | Golden Handshake Scheme |
Central Board of Revenue Read More... |
2002 PTD 562 (2002)85 TAX 332 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MUHAMMAD INAYATULLAH CHEEMA
VS Sardar ALI RAZA MASOOD QAZILBASH |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 129,134, 55, 61 | Constitutional petition/appeal pending |
Assessee filed return of total income and after providing further information in response to notice issued under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer--Assessee challenged assessment order Read More... |
2002 PTD 1195 86 TAX 241 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BUTT and 4 others VS GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Islamabad and 5 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(24), Second Sched. | Golden Handshake/ Deduction of tax/legal fiction |
Central Board of Revenue Circular No.15 of 1997, dated 16-11-1997 Payments made to employees under Golden Handshake Scheme/Deduction of tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 562 (2002)85 TAX 332 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) | Finding of Tribunal |
Reference/appeal Maintainability -Finding of Tribunal was primarily based on the appreciation of as Observation of Tribunal in respect of applicability of S13(a) of the Income Tax Ordinance. 1979 were in accordance with law-No Read More... |
2002 PTD 1197 86 TAX 224 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS ATEED RIAZ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) | Rectification of order |
Rectification of Read More... |
2002 PTD 570 (2002)86 TAX 130 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS Messrs B.C.C.I. OVERSEAS LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(a) | Partial deductions/ Various recipients |
Reference Question of law Requirement-Authority found the assessee-company to have withheld Tax at a lesser you from its dealers Tribunal was of the view that Department had made credit in the cases of recipients to the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1197 86 TAX 224 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS ATEED RIAZ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 62, 132, 135 , 136, 136(1)(2) | Reference to High Court/Limitation |
Tribunal Passed order under S.135 of the Ordinance on 21-9-2000/No reference application under S.136(1) in respect of any question of law Read More... |
2002 PTD 570 (2002)86 TAX 130 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
GHAFFAR HUSSAIN
VS REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EASTERN REGION), LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 157, 157(2)(a) (iv), 157(3)(a) | Authorized representative | Advocate |
Authorized representative of assesse--Scope Legal practitioner entitled to practice in any Civil Court in Pakistan is included among, the authorized representatives under the provision of S.157(2)(a) (iv) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1205 86 TAX 239 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MUSLIM INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COYS. III, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 26(a), First Sched, Fourth Sched., 5 | Insurance company/Income from dividend |
Insurance company/General insurance business/Income from dividend and NIT Units in assessment year 1992-93/Chargeability to tax/-Special Read More... |
2002 PTD 577 (2002)85 TAX 273 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs CRESCENT ART FABRICS (PVT.) LTD
VS INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 , 136(1) | Withdrawal of Reference/ Constitutional petition |
Constitutional petition-Petition filed after withdrawal of reference- Maintainability Re-opening of assessment---After having been un successful before the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee preferred Income Tax Reference before High Read More... |
2002 PTD 1206 87 TAX 222 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mian Mukhtar, I.T.P. VS Agha Hadayatullah, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 2(16), 2(24), 3, 7, Second Sched., 8(3), | Rental income/ Exemption for self-occupied |
C.B.R. Circular No. 11 of 1994, Read More... |
2002 PTD 586 85 TAX 232 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI
VS Mst. SHAKEELA BANO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 61, 135, 136(1) | Service of notice on assessee |
Scope Question of law not raised before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Effect Dispute was with regard to service of notice on assessee under S.56 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Tribunal having found that the notice was never served upon the assessee, dismissed the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1209 87 TAX 304 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Aslam Anwar VS Abdul Jaleel, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(1)(16)(ii) | Interpretations/favor of assessee |
Principle that "where two equally Read More... |
2002 PTD 598 85 TAX 171 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
Smt. TAPATIPAL
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 159, 271(1)(c)., 254 | Deemed assessee |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal-Powers of Tribunal--Power to remand New plea raised for first time before Tribunal in penalty proceedings that assessee was ill during relevant period---Tribunal justified in remanding matter to Assessing Read More... |
2002 PTD 1216 82 TAX 589 241 ITR 468 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) | expenses of advertising and sales promotion |
Disallowance of expenses with reference to R.33 of Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976---Validity---Rule 33 of the Drugs Read More... |
2002 PTD 117 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS NAGI REDDI CHARITIES |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(24), 11, 12, 13, 13(1)(bb) | Exemption/Charitable purpose |
Exemption-Charitable purpose---Charitable trust-Copyrights in films assigned to trust subject to distribution arrangements made by donors prior to such assignment-Monies received by trust under assignment directed specifically to be held Read More... |
2002 PTD 1220 83 TAX 92 241 ITR 431 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Messrs ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 23, 136(1) | Allowances paid to medical representatives |
Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules, 1976, R.33---Reference to High Court---Question whether Tribunal was justified to confirm Read More... |
2002 PTD 117 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
SHARADA PULLELA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 273A | Penalty Waiver or reduction of penalty |
Penalty Interest Waiver or reduction of penalty or interest Commissioner of Income-tax must decide application for such waiver or rejection on merits Rejection of application without application of mind is not valid Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1225 82 TAX 595 241 ITR 473 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
S.V. MUZUMDAR VS TAX RECOVERY OFFICER And Others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 | Purchase of property attached by dept. |
Recovery of tax Writ Attachment and sale of property Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale Writ would not issue to quash order Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. 85 Constitution Read More... |
||
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mohiuddin Siddiqui VS Ghulam, Appraiser |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Order of the Larger Bench |
Contradictions between order of Division Bench and Larger Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of valuation of property---Order of Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
S.V. MUZUMDAR
VS TAX RECOVERY OFFICER and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220 | Purchase of property attached by dept. |
Recovery of tax-Writ-Attachment and sale of property--Aggrieved person can appeal against order of attachment and proclamation of sale--- Writ would not issue to quash order-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.220, Sched. 11, R. Read More... |
2002 PTD 1229 241 ITR 481 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs CAVALRY SUPER STORE
VS THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1, ZONE, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 | Assessment/ infructuous |
Constitutional petition---Re-opening of assessment---During the pendency of Constitutional petition assessment order had already been passed by Read More... |
2002 PTD 133 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2002 |
NATIONAL LEATHER CLOTH MANUFACTURING CO
VS INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 148 | Reassessment Scientific research |
Reassessment Scientific research Donation to approved institution for scientific research-Claim for deduction under S.35(1)(ii) granted Withdrawal of approval with retrospective effect to institution to which donation was granted Read More... |
2002 PTD 1230 241 ITR 482 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Sameera Yasia, D.R. VS Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 | inherited properties |
Inclusion of value in net wealth of inherited properties under litigation for partition and possession---Assessee showed only his share in the Read More... |
2002 PTD 134 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2002 |
CHANDRA MOHAN
VS UNION OF INDIA and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 140, 240 | Refund/Amount paid as tax could not be refunded.. |
Refund-Section 240 would apply only where refund becomes due as a result of an order passed in appeal or other proceeding under Indian Income- tax Act--Return filed and tax paid by assessee-No order of assessment within period of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1233 82 TAX 465 241 ITR 484 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Sameera Yasia, D.R. VS Rashid Sarwar, F.C.A. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 16(3), 3 | Interpretation of statutes/ hardship and harshness |
Plea of hardship and harshness cannot provide justification for ignoring the law as enacted by the Legislature---When a law enacted by the Read More... |
2002 PTD 134 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS RAJAPALAYAM MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32 | Depreciation |
Actual cost Subsidy Not liable to be reduced from actual cost of assets for determination of depreciation Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Held, that the assessment orders allowing depreciation without reducing the SIPCOT subsidy Read More... |
2002 PTD 1239 82 TAX 472 241 ITR 492 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Akhtar Hussain VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18), 66A , 59A | House building advance |
Applicability of S.66A, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Inspecting Additional Commissioner could always probe into the matter and judge the Read More... |
2002 PTD 141 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS CURRENCY INVESTMENT CO. LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Business loss |
Loss on account of dealing in shares/Identity of purchaser and seller not disputed/Failure to produce broker through whom shares were sold Read More... |
2002 PTD 1241 82 TAX 474 241 ITR 494 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Assessee in default |
Assessee in default---On failure to make deduction at source the payer becomes an assessee in default to the extent of that much amount which Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
OCEANIC PRODUCTS EXPORTING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 68 | Cash credits Burden of proof |
Cash credits/Effect of S.68/Burden of proof/Burden on assessee to prove source of credits and credit worthiness of lenders/Alleged creditors fishermen who were not capable of lending substantial amounts/Finding by Tribunal that cash Read More... |
2002 PTD 1244 82 TAX 477 241 ITR 497 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Notice of monitoring tax deductions |
Notice of assessee demanding challan of payment under S.50 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer having the jurisdiction Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Tahir Khan, D.R. VS Riffat Hussain Malik |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 108(b), , 139 , 142 | Penalty/ No serious prejudice |
Jurisdiction of tax Recovery Read More... |
2002 PTD 616 (2002)85 TAX 153 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
M. S. P. SENTHIL KUMAR
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147 | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Remand/Order of remand final unless challenged through appropriate proceedings/Reassessment/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of Income-tax Officer to reopen assessment under S.147(b) and restoring matter to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1248 82 TAX 481 241 ITR 502 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
MONTGOMERY FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5, 52, 50(1)(4)(4A), 52, 5(a)(b) | Concurrent jurisdiction |
Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authority---Deduction of tax Authorities---Current jurisdiction not-barred---No bar is contained under S.5 of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 155 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalid Maqbool for Appellant (in I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001). VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. for Respondent (in, I.T.A. No.2812/LB of 2001). |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 134, 8 | Appeal Tribunal/ Filing of appeal by the Dept. |
Issuance of Certificate of pendency of departmental appeal before filling of appeal --- Effect--- Filing of appeal by the Department Read More... |
2002 PTD 625 (2002)85 TAX 68 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
Smt. GOWRI RAJES and others VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 254 | Question concluded/ cannot be re-agitated |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Question concluded by earlier order of Tribunal cannot be re-agitated/Tribunal upholding jurisdiction of ITO to reopen assessment under S,147(b) and directing the Assessing Officer to make fresh assessment/No Read More... |
2002 PTD 1252 82 TAX 484 241 ITR 506 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed VS Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | Liability / law was repealed/omitted |
Where liability of the assessee was created under a law when that was in force during the assessment year under consideration such liability Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE VS LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. | Income was exempt from levy of tax |
Assessee declared nil income in assessment years 1976-77 to 1983-84--- Assessing Officer rejected assessee’s claim that its Income was Read More... |
2002 PTD 629 (2002)85 TAX 25 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
Capital or revenue expenditure/Tribunal finding that expenditure had been incurred to maintain and preserve asset/Tribunal justified in holding that expenditure was revenue in nature/No question of law arose, from its order/Indian Read More... |
2002 PTD 1255 82 TAX 487 241 ITR 509 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed VS Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | law repealed/omitted/ tax liability |
Rights and liabilities accrued and created under a provision of law cannot be taken away when that law is repealed/omitted subsequently. Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BZONE, LAHORE VS LAHORE CANTONMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 166, 54, 88, 166(2)(d) , Second Sched. | Registration of firm |
Registration of firm-Refusal of registration/Order under S.68(4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was not merely for granting of Read More... |
2002 PTD 629 (2002)85 TAX 25 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SIMCO METERS LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 | Revision |
Revision / Appeal/Powers of CIT/CIT can revise matter not agitated in appeal/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1258 82 TAX 490 241 ITR 511 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Bashir Ahmed VS Abdul Jalil, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 12, 12(18A), 12(18A) | Deemed income/ Loan |
Deemed income---Loan---Assessment year 1995-96---Assessee failed to repay loan within five year by 30-6-1994---Such loan was assessed as Read More... |
2002 PTD 159 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Aslam; D.R. VS Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 68(4), 68, 69, (5), 59 | Self-assessment/immunity from special audit. |
C.B.R Circular No. 5 of 1997, dated 12-7-1997 --- C.B.R. Circular No. 12 of Read More... |
2002 PTD 639 (2002)85 TAX 102 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SIMCO METERS LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 263 | investment allowance |
Revision/Appeal to Appellate Tribunal- Manufacture of electric meters/Order withdrawing investment allowance in revision proceedings/Tribunal erroneously setting aside order of revision on ground of jurisdiction/Matter remanded to Read More... |
2002 PTD 1258 82 TAX 490 241 ITR 511 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Vishno Raja Qavi, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 52, 86, 2(6)(43) | Failing to deduct or pay tax |
Liability of persons failing to deduct or pay tax---Additional tax---Refund---Adjustment of---Tax payable under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 166 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mian Muhammad Azeem VS Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A , 59A | Assessment on the basis of return |
Powers of IAC to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order/ Assessment on the basis of return / Self Assessment Scheme / Non Filling of wealth Read More... |
2002 PTD 650 (2002)85 TAX 148 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
BALASUBRAMANIA FOUNDRY VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40 | Fuel surcharge for power consumption |
Business expenditure/Accounting/Liability in respect of additional fuel surcharge for power consumption/Assessee following mercantile system accounting/Agreement between assesssee and Electricity Board that fuel surcharge would form part Read More... |
2002 PTD 1267 241 ITR 523 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Anwar-ul-Haq, D.R. VS Sh. Sharif Hussain |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 14, 14(2), 16, 17, 17(1)(b), 16(5) | Wealth escaping assessment/ Limitation Notice |
Wealth escaping assessment---Limitation---Notice under S.17(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 could be issued within a period of 5 years from the Read More... |
2002 PTD 168 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUNDARYA NURSERY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2(1) | Gratuity |
Gratuity/Conditions laid down in S.40A (7) must be fulfilled in order to claim deduction/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A.The assessee is not entitled to the deduction of the provision made towards the gratuity liability without Read More... |
2002 PTD 1270 82 TAX 499 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
AL-WARIS TRADERS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance and Ex-Officio Chairman, C.B.R., Islamabad and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(7-A), 80-C & 162 | Advance income-tax |
Suit for declaration and permanent injunction-Payment of advance income-tax---Plaintiff had sought declaration to the effect that he was not Read More... |
2002 PTD 173 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 | Agricultural income |
Agricultural income/Income from nurseries/Income from sale of plants grown in pots/Income from sale of seeds/Agricultural income/Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.2(1). |
2002 PTD 1274 242 ITR 708 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS S. G. SAMBANDAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 148,163 , 172 | Non-Resident/occasional Shipping business |
Representative assessee/Reassessment/Scope of S.172/Difference between agent of master of ship and agent of non-resident principal/Effect of amendment of S.172 with effect from 1-6-1975/Return filed and assessment under S.172 in Read More... |
2002 PTD 1274 242 ITR 708 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Tahir, I.T.P. VS Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, | Definite information |
Information received by the Assessing Officer about discount, after the original assessment is a “definite information”. Read More... |
2002 PTD 183 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Abdul Tahir, I.T.P. VS Mahfooz ur Rehman Pasha, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 132, 65, 156, | Rectification of mistake/Appeal before Appellate Tribunal |
Appeal before Appellate Tribunal---Argument in respect of rectification made by First Appellate Authority---Validity---Argument that original Read More... |
2002 PTD 183 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Shahid Abbas for Appellant. VS Muhammad Asif; D.R. for Respondent |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 17B, Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 12(1) | House-Exemption |
Powers of IAC to revise Wealth Tax Officer's order Exemption--House-Exemption allowed of one self-occupied house at Lahore was cancelled by Read More... |
2002 PTD 676 85 TAX 168 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUTHERN EXPLOSIVES CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 263 | Income/ Sales Tax collected from customers |
Income-Sales Tax collected from customers--Liability regarding part of amount disputed before sales tax authorities and assessee treating that part as a deposit/Amount treated as deposit was part of t liability and was a trading Read More... |
2002 PTD 1285 242 ITR 107 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) | Advance income-tax/ full and final discharge |
Filing of return---Scope---Person who is an importer and has no other source of income and has paid the tax under the provisions of S.50(5) of Read More... |
2002 PTD 187 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Constitutional petition/ alternate remedy not efficacious |
Constitutional petition --- Failure to avail revisional remedy --- Effect --- Availability of revisional remedy is not fatal to Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS HARYANA MINERALS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 145, 256 | Valuation of stock |
Change in method of valuation of stock-Finding by Tribunal that change was bona fide and changed method was followed regularly in succeeding Read More... |
2002 PTD 1291 242 ITR 704 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
IMPORIENT CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD through Chief Executive
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE II, LAHORE and another |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50, 50(5), 50(4) | Presumptive tax regime |
Deduction of tax at source---Opting for presumptive tax regime---Filing of irrevocable declaration---Effect---Filing of such declaration opting Read More... |
2002 PTD 187 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Discretion-Administrative decision |
Discretion-Administrative Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS JANMABHOOMI PRESS TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 | Charitable trust/ Borrowed funds |
Charitable trust--Exemption/Borrowed funds utilised in construction of building which would augment income of trust/Repayment of debt amounted to application of income for charitable purposes--Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. |
2002 PTD 1293 242 ITR 709 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Saiyed Saeed Ashhad and Abdul Ghani Shaikh, JJ VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65(1)(a)(b) | Re-opening of assessment / Definite information |
Re-opening of Read More... |
2002 PTD 191 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interim relief |
Appellate Authority--Power to grant interim relief Authority having power to grant final relief has the ancillary or incidental power to Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | Business expenditure / Exemption Director |
Business expenditure--Ceiling on expenditure Exemption Director of company a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6)(viia)---Amount exempt under S. 10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs BE BE JAN PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED, FAISALABAD
VS THE I.A.C. Or INCOME TAX OF COMPANIES RANGE VI, FAISALABAD and 3 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65 | Re-opening of assessment/ Show-cause notice |
Re-opening of assessment on the basis of second show-cause notice on another aspect of assessment---Validity---Earlier is a show-cause notice was Read More... |
2002 PTD 208 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Petition/ Maintainability |
Petition---Maintainability-Where impugned action is completely without jurisdiction or illegal and no immediate departmental remedy is Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | Business expenditure/ Surtax |
Business expenditure---Company-Surtax paid by assessee not to be deducted while computing total income under Income-tax Act--Indian Companies (Profits) Surtax Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs H.I. (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Question of fact |
Appeal to High Court---Question of fact---Question as to whether assessee purchased an open plot or some construction was also raised thereupon Read More... |
2002 PTD 212 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interlocutory relief / Re-opening the case |
Constitutional petition--Re-opening of assessment---Interlocutory relief-Where petitioner has Challenged the very notice of re-opening the Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD. (and vice versa) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(6) (7), 40(c) 8c 40A(5)(b), | determination of damages/ Not an accrued liability |
Business expenditure/Assessee entering into contracts for supply of insulators to Electricity Boards Provision for reduction in contract price by 1/2 per cent per week of contract value if assessee failed in due performance of contract Read More... |
2002 PTD 1295 = 242 ITR 691 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Income from other sources/ Interest income |
Interest income---No business income---Business expenses---Set-off against interest income---No notice for discontinuation of business---First Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Presumptive tax regime/assessment |
Distinction- History, Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/Interest |
Capital or Revenue expenditure General principles---Expenditure on interior decoration of newly-constructed premises obtained on lease Revenue expenditure-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Presumptive tax regime |
Application of presumptive to regime of S. 80-C, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979--Powers of Assessing Officer-Categories to which presumptive tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | certified copies of order/cannot exclude the time |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/Limitation/Effect of Explanation to R.9 of Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 Income-tax Department furnished with copy of order of CIT-Time taken to obtain certified copies of order could not be Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Stay of recovery proceedings |
Petitioner's appeal pending before Commissioner-Assessing Officer took coercive actions by freezing Bank accounts under S.92 of the Ordinance Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | capital or Revenue expenditure |
The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Interim relief |
Interim relief is necessitated, where immediate urgent disposal of cases may not be possible and the delay would be detrimental to the Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | capital or Revenue expenditure |
The general principles applicable in determining whether a particular expenditure is capital or Revenue expenditure are as follows: (1) Read More... |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PAK-SAUDI FERTILIZERS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 80-C ,143-B ,55, 50(4), 80-C, 129 , 143-B, 92, 129, 134, 162 | Bar of suit |
Bar contained in S.162 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 would not apply where recoveries were in pursuance of order which were with Read More... |
2002 PTD 679 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
B AND A PLANTATIONS AND INDUSTRIES LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 |
Income/Interest/Loan given interest-free to sister concern--No Interest due or collected Notional amount could not be assessed on ground that interest ought to have been charged-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. |
2002 PTD 1301 242 ITR 22 |
||
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS MATRISEVA TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 | Charitable trust /Donation to another charitable |
Charitable purposes-Charitable trust-Exemption-Donation by assessee-trust to another charitable trust would amount to application of income for charitable purposes-Entitled to exemption-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. |
2002 PTD 1308 82 TAX 621 242 ITR 20 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Disallowance of expenditure/ Amounts paid in cash |
Amounts paid in cash in excess of specified limit---Amount paid in cash for disbursement among Lorry drivers---Payments reflected in account books---Amounts could not be disallowed---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(3)---Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Interest on borrowed capital |
Interest on borrowed capital No evidence that amounts had been borrowed for purposes of business Interest was not deductible Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Travel expenses |
Business expenditure---Travel expenses---No finding on question whether travel was for purposes of business---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Transport expenditure |
Case-1:The assessee-firm carried on the business of manufacturing, trading and export of cast iron. The assessee claimed deduction of payment of Rs.1,49,902 on transport. During the scrutiny, the Income- tax Officer found that out of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | Loan free of interest to sister concern |
The assessee had claimed deduction of interest on a loan of Rs.8,60,000. The loan had been advanced immediately to a sister concern free of interest. The case of the assessee was that it was not in fact an interest free loan to P but an Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2002 |
TIRUPATI TRADING CO
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 40A(3) | tours for the purpose of the business |
That no details were furnished before the Income-tax Officer as to whom the partners of the firm had contacted abroad for the purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 1310 83 TAX 68 242 ITR 13 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS ESCORTS EMPLOYEES ANCILLARIES LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 32 | Depreciation/ Actual cost |
Depreciation allowable on cost of acquisition of technical know-how---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. Depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is to be allowed on the total cost of the asset. The total cost shall Read More... |
2002 PTD 1317 83 TAX 199 242 ITR 74 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 VS 37, 45, 48, 49 & 50 |
KALI AERATED WATER WORKS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX | Capital gains/ Computation of |
Machinery obtained on dissolution of firm contributed as capital in new firm---Sale taken into account in calculating its cost--Sections 49 & 50 were not machinery---Depreciation allowed on machinery to old firm could not be applicable---Value as shown in books Read More... |
2002 PTD 1319 83 TAX 83 242 ITR 79 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/Royalty |
Capital or revenue expenditure-Royalty-Five-year agreement for provisions of technical know-how for manufacture of air-cleaners-- Royalty paid per air-cleaner manufactured---Not a payment for acquisition of capital asset---Deductible as Read More... |
2002 PTD 1324 242 ITR 2002 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS SOUTHERN PRESSINGS (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Capital gains/ Business income /Sale shares |
Capital gains-Business---Business income or capital gains-Sale shares--Shares held by share broker as personal assets and included wealth tax return---Gains assessable as capital gains-Assessee to relief under S.54F-Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1324 242 ITR 2002 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SIVAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A | Depreciation Borewell Rigs |
Depreciation Special depreciation---Borewell---Rigs compressors mounted on a lorry and used for drilling borewell---Not and entitled to special depreciation at 30 per cent.---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. Read More... |
2002 PTD 1332 2002 SLD 213 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SIVAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A | Investment allowance |
Investment allowance---Borewell-Rigs and compressors used for drilling borewell---Not entitled to investment allowance---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A. |
2002 PTD 1332 2002 SLD 213 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 37, 80 | Capital or Revenue expenditure/ Donation to cricket club |
Donation to cricket club---Tribunal right in holding that contribution to cricket club cannot be treated as capital in nature and directing Assessing Officer to allow it as Revenue expenditure---No question of law arose---Indian Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 1336 242 ITR 86 83 TAX 212 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS NIHAL CHAND REKYAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 263, 271 | Penalty proceedings |
Revision-Commissioner-Scope powers Penalty- Commissioner directing Income-tax Officer to initiate penalty proceedings--Penalty proceedings are not part of assessment proceedings-Tribunal right in quashing direction given by Read More... |
2002 PTD 1339 82 TAX 620 242 ITR 45 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS A. SREENIVASA PAI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 139, 271 | Concealment of income Penalty |
Return Concealment of income...Scope of Expln. 1 to S. 271(1)(c) inserted with effect from 1-4-1976-Presumption of concealment where assessee offers explanation in respect of credit which Assessing Officer considers to be false Revised Read More... |
2002 PTD 1341 83 TAX 222 242 ITR 29 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Expenditure above prescribed limit |
Disallowance of expenditure above prescribed limit-Travelling expenses of employee or, "any other person"- Meaning of "any other person" in R.6D(2)--Any other person would include a Director or Managing Director---Travelling expenses of Director or Managing Director Read More... |
2002 PTD 1351 242 ITR 245 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS K.P.V. SHAIK MOHAMED ROWTHER & COL (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 (1) | Commission paid to employees |
Shipping agent Finding that employees canvassed for orders for their employer Extent of allowance of commission paid would depend on the facts of relevant previous year. |
2002 PTD 1351 242 ITR 245 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS GULZAR UL HAQ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) | Super Tax |
Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More... |
2002 PTD 226 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS GULZAR UL HAQ |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 69, 69(4) | Super Tax |
Assessment of firms and partners---Share of super tax allowable to a partner was to be in the same proportion as his share in total Read More... |
2002 PTD 226 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Additional assessment/ Revised returns |
Notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention was that assumption of jurisdiction by issuing notice under S.61 of the Income Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | Deemed income/ Gold brought into Pakistan |
Deemed income---Gold brought into Pakistan---Personal effects---Nothing was brought on record to establish that gold brought into Pakistan was Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Zaki Ahmad, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 30, 22 , 72 | World income/ Exemption |
---“World income”---Exemption---Tax payer is required to declare total world income and in case income-tax had been paid abroad, Read More... |
2002 PTD 214 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Younas Ghazi, F.C.A. VS Muhammad Asif, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 108, 55 | Failure to furnish return | Penalty |
Failure to furnish return of total income---Penalty---Penalty imposed under S.108 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for the late filing of return Read More... |
2002 PTD 237 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Lease income/ Industrial / undertaking |
Lease income---Industrial undertaking---Exemption---Lease income was not part of the profits and against derived from an industrial undertaking Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Property |
Inadmissible deduction---Add back---Deletion of---Deletion of machinery repairs add back was upheld by the Tribunal as the same had been done in Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Additional tax/ Show-cause notice |
Additional tax---Show-cause notice---Speaking order---Necessity---Additional tax cancelled by the First Appellate Authority was restored by the Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mirza Muhammad Waheed Baig VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 110,30, 22 ,24, 88 | Penalty for non-compliance |
Penalty for non-compliance with notice, etc.---Cancellation of penalty, levied under S.110 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by the First Read More... |
2002 PTD 244 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 23(1)(vii), 30 | Borrowed capital/ Interest income/Interest payable |
Deduction---Borrowed capital---Interest income---Interest payable---Deduction whether admissible---Department taxed the amount of interest income Read More... |
2002 PTD 250 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Naeem Akhtar Sh., F.C.A. VS Mian Javed-ur-Rehman, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) 2(16)(ii), 17B | Bank loan/ asset/project / Partly sold out |
Bank loan was obtained against an asset/project---Entire project was not offered for taxation having been partly sold out---Entire liabilities Read More... |
2002 PTD 252 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Asif Ali Khan, A.C.M.A. and Muhammad Irshad, I.T.P. VS Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 23, 66-A | Business expenditure |
Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Deduction---Payment made to secure the market free Read More... |
2002 PTD 257 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Yousaf Ali, I.T.P. . VS nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 | Travel agent / Commission/ Gross receipts |
Assessee, a travel agent---Commission---Gross receipts---Sale of assets---Inspecting Additional Commissioner directed the Assessing Officer to Read More... |
2002 PTD 260 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66,66-A, 80-D,156, 62 | Assessment, after the revision |
Assessment, after the revision, was rectified under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer---Validity---Since original Read More... |
2002 PTD 260 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 66-A,59,59(4) | Self-assessment/ Last declared/ Assessed |
Income last declared or assessed whichever is higher---Words “last declared or assessed” as used in Self-Assessment Read More... |
2002 PTD 267 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD. VS D.C., INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) | Commission / Discount |
Gross profit rate---History of the case---Re-casting of account---Application of gross profit rate following the history of the case after Read More... |
2002 PTD 275 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
NYLEX (PRIVATE) LTD. VS D.C., INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136,136(1),14,24 (c) | Issue raised out of First Appellate Authority’s order |
---R. Read More... |
2002 PTD 275 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 66-A, | Order passed IAC |
C.B.R. Circular C.No.2(1) DATA-2 of 1994, dated 19-2-1994---Powers of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioners’ Read More... |
2002 PTD 278 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Objection raised in Audit Report |
Power of Inspecting Additional Commissioner to revise Deputy Commissioner’s order---Objection raised in Audit Report---Proceedings based on Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | concept of change of opinion |
Order of the Inspecting Additional Commissioner could not be hit by the concept of change of opinion on the part of Assessing Officer as he, Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Change of opinion |
Change of opinion---Initiation of proceedings under S.156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by the Assessing Officer and subsequently under Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE VS MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Ss. 59, 61, 65 & 136(1) | Self-Assessment Scheme/Re-opening of case/ immunity |
Central Board of Revenue Circular No.9, dated 1-7-1993, para. 1(i) ---Appeal---Self-Assessment Scheme---Re-opening of case---Assessment under Self-Assessment Scheme was not accepted by the Income-tax Authorities and notice under S.61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 1560 87 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Change of opinion |
Inspecting Additional Commissioner’s direction to Assessing Officer to issue notice under S.116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Nasim VS NEMO |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Setting off of loss incorrectly |
Order prejudicial to the interest of Revenue---Setting off of loss incorrectly---If it was found that the loss was incorrectly set off against Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Nasim VS Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 116, 66-A, 156, 34, 36, 37, 27, 9, 2(12)(24)(44) & Second Sched., Part I, CI. (116), 59(1)(3), | Capital gain | Stock in trade |
Capital gain---Stock in trade---Income From---Head of income-Words “held by an assessee” as used in the context of capital assets Read More... |
2002 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX/WEALTH TAX, LAHORE ZONE-B, LAHORE VS MESSRS NOOR TRADING COMPANY, PATTOKI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 61. 65 & 136(1) | Self-Assessment Scheme/Object and scope/ Immunity clause |
Self-Assessment Scheme---Object and scope---Immunity clause in any fiscal statute or a similar concession in the rules framed thereunder, is an expression of helplessness on the part of the Revenue to tap the pilferage---Once the helplessness is so declared in the Read More... |
2002 PTD 1560 87 TAX 102 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat VS Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) | Words and Phrases |
----“Any”----Meanings----Word “any” has a diversity of meaning as may be employed to indicate “all” or Read More... |
2002 PTD 303 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Khalik Waggan, A.C.A. and Irfan Saadat VS Shaheen Aziz Niazi, D.R |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 24,24(b), 50(7D) | Inadmissible deduction |
Inadmissible deduction-----Expression “instrument of any Kind” used in S.50(7D) of the Income Tax Ordinance, Read More... |
2002 PTD 303 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. VS Nemo |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) R. 8(5) | Sale proceeds Addition |
Sale proceeds Addition---Addition was made on the ground that sale consideration was shown lesser than the fair market value of the assets Read More... |
2002 PTD 309 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As VS Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B | Circular/instructions |
Circulars instructions by Central Board of Revenue of beneficial nature, are binding on the field Read More... |
2002 PTD 316 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2002 |
Akbar G. Merchant and Ms. Yasmin Ajani, F.C.As. VS Muhammad Umer Farooq, D.R. |
Wealth Tax Act, 1963. section 17-B | Remittances | Normal banking channel |
Second Sched. , Part I, Cl. 7(ii) Exemption Remittances not proved through normal banking channel Sale of Foreign Exchange Bearer Bonds No Read More... |
2002 PTD 316 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs MEHTAB INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SAHIWAL through Chief Executive VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, CIRCLE 16, COMPANIES ZONE I, LAHORE and 3 others |
Finance Act, 1991 12,234 | Constitutional jurisdiction/ Appellate jurisdiction |
Art. 199 Constitutional jurisdiction Scope Distinct from Appellate jurisdiction Fact alone that after the order of Tribunal, assessee has no Read More... |
2002 PTD 324 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE III, LAHORE VS Messrs MARGALA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Appeal to High Court |
Appeal to High Court Question in the nature of argument pre-supposing a finding of fact was refused to be entertained for consideration Read More... |
2002 PTD 327 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS SRINIVASA HATCHERIES (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 256 | Income Trust |
Reference Depreciation Plant Building Poultry sheds whether plant entitled to a higher rate of depreciation Question of law Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.32 & 256. Held, that the question Read More... |
2001 PTD 1416 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ABAD HOTELS INDIA (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32A | Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment |
Investment allowance/ Hotel business/ Kitchen, store-room and equipment used for producing foodstuffs/ Not entitled to investment allowance as there is no production of food materials in a hotel/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32A. Hotel business is not an Read More... |
2001 PTD 1764 [(2000)82 TAX 98] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 43, 43B, 142 | Income Trust |
Business expenditure Tax, duty, cess or fee Deduction only on actual payment Proviso to S. 43B clarifying that sums paid after accounting year but before due date for submission of return would be deductible Supreme Court decision in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1417 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS VAIKUNDAM RUBBER CO. LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.57 | Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits |
Other sources/ Deduction/ Interest from fixed deposits/ Borrowals for agricultural purposes/ Interest paid on borrowals/ Not a charge on interest income from fixed deposits/ Not deductible/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.57. The assessee derived interest Read More... |
2001 PTD 1770 [(2000)82 TAX 112] [241 I T R 50] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS DURGA ENGINEERING AND FOUNDRY WORKS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 254, 254(1), 254(2), 256 | Income Trust |
Reference Scope of S.256 Questions which can be referred to High Court All orders passed by Tribunal under S.254 Order of rectification passed under S. 254(2) Reference lies from such order to High Court Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. Read More... |
2001 PTD 1420 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK PLC VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 214, 220 & 246 | Levy of interest/ Interest payable by Government |
Appeal to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/ Recovery of tax/ Competency of appeal/ Levy of interest under S.220(2)/ No appeal lies against such levy/ Levy of interest by Assessing Officer while giving effect to order of Tribunal/ No Read More... |
2001 PTD 1773 [241 ITR 269] |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS FRANCO TOSI INGEGNERIA |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Business expenditure/ Commencement of business |
Business expenditure/ Commencement of business/ Assesse, a non-resident-Company/ Securing letter of intent for project in India on 13-4-1981/ Thereafter, setting up site office on 1-10-1981/ Business commenced on 13-4-1981/ Expenditure from that Read More... |
2001 PTD 1782 [241 ITR 268] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
BHARAT EARTH MOVERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Income Trust |
Business expenditure General principles Difference between accrued and contingent liabilities Amount set apart to meet liability on account of leave encashment of employees Not a contingent liability Amount is deductible Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1427 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 147(b) | Reassessment/ Information that income had escaped assessment |
Reassessment/ Information that income had escaped assessment/ Extra depreciation allowed/ Revenue audit drawing attention to relevant provision/ reopening of assessment on basis of audit report—Report of audit constituted “information”/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1784 [241 ITR 248] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) | Dictionary meanings |
Dictionary meanings, however, helpful in understanding general sense of the words cannot control where the scheme of the statute or the instrument considered as a whole clearly conveys a somewhat different shade of meaning. Words have to Read More... |
2001 PTD 1288 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16, 30 & 31 | Salary income/ Income from other sources |
Salary income/ Determination/ Condition precedent to the classification of the income under S.16 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was that the payer and the payee had the relationship of the “employer” and the “employee”. Ss.16, 30 Read More... |
2001 PTD 1794 [(2001)83 TAX 214] |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Salman Pasha VS Zaki Ahmed |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) Ss.17-B, 16(3) & 2(5)(ii) | Valuation/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building |
Powers of Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to revise Wealth Tax Officer”s order/ Unfinished four storeys of commercial building/ Portions of ground floor and first floor of said building were let out and were competed by the assesses out of the amount of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1809 83 TAX 219 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) S.50(3-A) | Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation |
Deduction of tax at source/ Convention for avoidance of double taxation/ Exemption/ Assesse claimed exemption, from deduction of tax from payment to non-resident on account of technical services, under double tax treaty/ Validity/ Exemption under double tax treaty Read More... |
2001 PTD 1816 (2001)83 TAX 248 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) Second Sched., Part I, Cl. 77-A, Ss.2(29), 50 & 52 | Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax |
Exemption/ Interest/ Liability of person failing to deduct or pay tax/ Deduction of tax at source-Fee for technical services-Tax under S.52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was levied as the assesse had not made deductions on payments in respect of technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 1816 (2001)83 TAX 248 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
FECTO BELARUS TRACTORS LIMITED VS PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance Economic Affairs and another |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art.188/ Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XXVI, R.1 | Review of Supreme Court judgment |
Review of Supreme Court judgment/ Rearguing the appeal at review stage/ Validity/ Distinction existed between review and rehearing and attempt to reargue the appeal at review stage was not permissible: |
2001 PTD 1829 84 TAX 25 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
null VS null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right |
Right of appeal/ right of appeal which was available at the time of commencement of a “lis” could not be taken away except by express language. Right of appeal/ Not an inherent right/ Right of appeal is not an inherent right but it Read More... |
2001 PTD 1848 (2001)83 TAX 206 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
JANARDAN DAS VS BINDESHWARI PRASAD SAH and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 132-A. | Search and seizure |
---Search and seizure---Search and seizure under Bihar Money Lenders’ Act---Requisition of seized assets---Scope of power under under S.132-A---Power under S.132-A---Power under S. 132-A has to be exercised immediately after property is seized by police Read More... |
2001 PTD 26 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
BRITIANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 45 & 147 | Capital gains |
---Reassessment---Capital gains---Amount of capital gains shown in return and accepted by Assessing Officer---Subsequent report by Valuation Officer that fair market Read More... |
2001 PTD 31 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
DAVENDRA PAL SINGH VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.2(e) | Agricultural land |
Exemption/ Agricultural land/ Agreement in May, 1989 to sell to developer land which had groves on it/ Purchaser authorized to cut trees/ Application for approval for development of land submitted in June, 1989 and amount paid to development authority in September, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1860 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SAROJA RAMAN and antother |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.164. S.164. | Trustee |
---Representative assesse---Trustee—Maximum marginal rate of tax--- Condition precedent---Beneficiaries or shares of beneficiaries should be indeterminate or unknown---Discretion to trustees regarding time and extent of disbursal of income to beneficiaries is Read More... |
2001 PTD 38 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS K. VIJAYAKUMAR |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Part I of Schedule I | Land and building used for business |
Additional wealth tax/ Exemption/ Land and building used for business/ Meaning of "business"/ Agricultural activity amounts to business/ Assessee carrying on agriculture and ginning factory/ Entitled to exemption from additional wealth tax/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1877 |
|
Gauhati High Court (India) | 2001 |
DIRECTOR OF STATE LOTTERIES VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2(24)(ix) & 28. | lottery tickets |
Income---Lottery--Agent in lottery tickets---Meaning of "lottery"--- Lottery implies a right to participate in draw---Agent in lottery tickets does not have right to participate in draw-Income accruing to agent in respect of prizes on Read More... |
2001 PTD 43 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
INCOME TAX OFFICER VS SARADBHAI M. LAKHANI AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Reassessment |
Reassessment/ Information that income has escaped assessment/ -Decision of High Court would constitute information- Initiation of. Reassessment proceedings on basis of such decision is valid/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.147 (b). Held, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1879 83 TAX 160 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) | depreciation |
Rectification---Mistake apparent from the record---Powers of Appellate Tribunal---Tribunal deciding debatable issue---No decision of jurisdictional High Court on those issues---Judgment rendered by jurisdictional High Court subsequent to decision of Tribunal on such Read More... |
2001 PTD 77 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
NEW INDIA MINING CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ mining leases |
Business expenditure/ Condition precedent for deduction--Expenditure should have been actually incurred/ Assessee holding mining leases from State Government/ No expenditure towards restoration of lands to their original condition incurred by assessee/ Question Read More... |
2001 PTD 1881 84 TAX 418 |
|
Madras High Court | 2001 |
SREE PALANIAPPA TRANSPORTS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254 (2) | Depreciation |
The assessee, a registered firm, claimed set off of unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier years. There were conflicting decisions of the various High Courts on the point and the Tribunal chose to follow the decision of the Allahabad Read More... |
2001 PTD 77 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS M.C. SATYAVATHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 4(1)(a)(iv). | Assessee gifting monies to trust |
Assessee”s husband creating trust for would be son-in-law/ Assessee gifting monies to trust/ Gift absolute and not revocable/ Gifted amounts not includible in computation of net wealth of assessee--Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.4(1)(a)(iv). The Read More... |
2001 PTD 1885 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
NORTH ARCOT DISTRICT COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING SOCIETY LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254(2) | Deficiency in stock |
---Business income---Deduction---Deficiency in stock---Loss not allowable as deduction. In the assessment year 1971-72 relevant for the accounting year ending June 30, 1970, the Income-tax Officer disallowed deduction claimed by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 81 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS M.C. SATYAVATHI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 61 | Inclusions in total income |
Total income/ Inclusions in total income/ Contributions made by assessee to trust created by her husband/ Contributions considered by High Court as gift with no power of revocation/ Interest attributable to contributions made by assessee not includible in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1885 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
VS In re: MOOLAMATTOM ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. | Cooperative society |
---Deduction of tax at source---Cooperative society---Exemption from liability to deduct tax at source---Scope of subsection (3) of S. 194A--- Cooperative society is entitled to exemption---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.2 & Read More... |
2001 PTD 84 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
PRABHAVATI B. SOLANKI VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 16 & 17A | Limitation/ Meaning of assessment |
Assessment/ Limitation/ Meaning of assessment/ Assessment includes determination of net wealth as well as computation of tax payable/ No finding on question whether computation of tax had been made before time limit/ Matter remanded/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Ss. Read More... |
2001 PTD 1887 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS S.VIJI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.2 & 194A. | Salary |
Salary---Standard deduction---Vehicle provided by employer for official personal use---Full standard deduction cannot be claimed---Indian come Tax Act, 1961, S.16 (i). For the assessment year 1977-78, Read More... |
2001 PTD 89 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
T. RAGHURAMAN VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(viiia) | Exemption/ Growing crops |
Exemption/ Growing crops/ Entire coffee and tea bushes apart from two leaves and bud of tea bush and berries of coffee bush do not fall within expression "growing crops" for exemption under S.5(1)(viiia) of Act/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1891 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS P. GANGADHARAN |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.6(1)(b). | Residence |
Non-resident---Test of residence---Maintenance of dwelling house india for 182 days in relevant previous year---Assessee, member of HUF, which owned a house in India---Though assessee might have a share in house, no evidence to indicate Read More... |
2001 PTD 97 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX/ WEALTH TAX
VS BABULAL KHINCHAND TRUST |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 21A, 11(1)(a) | Charitable trust |
Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust deed providing that if settlor left no wife or children, trust property should be applied. For such charitable purposes as may be decided upon by trustees--Deed had specifically provided for application of property for charitable Read More... |
2001 PTD 1893 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
K.SOMASUNDARAM & BROTHERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S .36(1)(iii) | Interest on borrowed |
Business expenditure---Interest on borrowed capital---Condition precedent for deduction---Capital must be used in business---Borrowed capital invested in executing contracts---From contract receipts, sums advanced interest free to Read More... |
2001 PTD 101 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS N. KAMATCHI AMMAL |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1A) | Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm |
Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Assets eligible for exemption owned by firm/ Partner entitled to exemption in respect of her share in firm/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1A). The principles relating to exemption which can be claimed by a partner of a firm Read More... |
2001 PTD 1895 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS AMALGAMATIONS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.22 & 263. | Property on rent |
---Revision---House property---Annual value---Property given on rent--- Annual value determined by Assessing Officer on the basis of actual rent in respect of one property and higher rent in respect of another party---No material too Read More... |
2001 PTD 108 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted equity shares of company/ If in provision for taxation advance tax paid is shown as liability it is not to be treated as liability/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D. If in the case Read More... |
2001 PTD 1899 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
V. RAMANUJAM VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income-tax Rules, 1962, Rr.40 & 117A | Advance tax |
Return---Advance tax---Interest---Waiver of interest---Application for waiver---Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard---Rejection of application without giving such an opportunity---Matter remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 113 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS A.V. REDDY, TRUST B. V. HARISH REDDY AND OTHERS |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.21 | Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property |
Trust/ Assessment/ Beneficiary entitled to corpus of trust property after attaining age of twenty-five years/ Beneficiary not attaining age of twenty-five years/ Interest of beneficiary in trust property alone is includible in net wealth of beneficiary/ Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 1899 243 ITR 195 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS HINDUSTAN MALLEABLE AND FIRGINGS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Interest |
---Appeal---Interest---Appeal Not maintainable against levy of interest---Liability to interest may be challenged in appeal against assessment---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. |
2001 PTD 118 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS JAWAHAR LAL MEHRA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 | Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth |
Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was signed by him/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1904 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS MEAT OF INDIA LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Subsidy |
---Capital or revenue expenditure---Subsidy---Tests---Purpose of subsidy set up or complete a new project---Subsidy is capital receipt---Subsidy received to run business operations successfully after commencement of production---Subsidy Read More... |
2001 PTD 127 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS MADURA DEVAKOTTAI TRANSPORTS (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | loan |
----Hundi loan---Additions made as transactions were not effected through account-payee cheque---Tribunal holding that they were not Hundis though written on Hundi papers---Additions deleted---Justified---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 129 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS A.M.M.AR. LAKSHMI ACHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted equity shares |
Valuation of unquoted equity shares/ Balance-sheet/ Sales tax penalty not shown. as a liability in balance-sheet/ Company succeeding in its challenge to imposition of penalty under Sales Tax Act/ Sales tax penalty not deductible as a liability. Indian Wealth Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 1909 246 ITR 468 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Smt. KAUSHALYABAI VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(8), 215 & 246. | Death of assessee |
--Reassessment---Death of assessee---Notice---Notice issued in the name of a person who was dead---Widow of such person participating in reassessment proceedings---Defect in notice stood automatically cured---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 141 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS GUJARAT POLYCRETE (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.43B & 256 | Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment |
Business expenditure/ Deduction only on actual payment/ Sales tax/ CBDT issuing circular stating that if a State Government had amended its Sales Tax Act to provide that sales tax deferred under an incentive scheme would. be treated as actually paid it would satisfy Read More... |
2001 PTD 1912 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
GOUTAM ROY VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. | Recovery of tax |
---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More... |
2001 PTD 143 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER.OF WEALTH TAX VS D.R. VADERA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 | Re-assessment/ Effect of reopening of |
Reassessment/ Effect of reopening of reassessment/ Previous order of underassessment is set aside and Assessing Officer has jurisdiction and duty to levy tax on entire wealth that has escaped assessment/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S. 17. Once an assessment Read More... |
2001 PTD 1914 246 IT R 348 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
GOUTAM ROY VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax 1961, Ss.132 & 226. | Recovery of tax |
---Recovery of tax---Garnishee proceedings---Attachment of rent of buil belonging to assessee---Assessment of income on the basis of search---Ar against assessment pending---No application for stay of demand or rece proceedings---Recovery proceedings were Read More... |
2001 PTD 143 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WRALTH TAX VS ANIL KUMAR AGGARWAL |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5 | Exemption/ House |
Wealth tax/ Exemption/ House/ Co-owner of house is entitled to exemption in respect of his share/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1917 246 ITR 93 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS BALARAMPUR CHINI MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 139(8), 215 & 246. | Capital Assets Capital Receipts |
----Capital or revenue receipt---Sugar manufacture---Expansion of plant to avail of additional free sale quota---Stipulation that surplus funds resulting to be used only to repay loans taken from financial institutions---Loans taken for Read More... |
2001 PTD 149 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 17 | Petition against notice without availing of remedies |
Reassessment/ Writ-Notice of reassessment/ Notice not illegal per se- Writ petition against notice Read More... |
2001 PTD 1919 246 ITR 90 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS MALIK CONSTRUCTION CO. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, 256, 256(1) | Award by arbitrator |
---Capital or revenue receipt---Assessee, a contractor---Award by arbitrator of additional sums to assessee for additional work done---Interest awarded on such sums for periods prior to award and thereafter up to date of payment is revenue Read More... |
2001 PTD 154 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Dr. MRUNALINIDEVI VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND OTHERS |
Constitution of India Art. 226 | Petition/ Existence of alternate remedy |
Existence of alternate remedy/ Writ will not normally issue/ Constitution of India, Art. 226. The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is couched in wide terms and the existence thereof is not subject to any Read More... |
2001 PTD 1919 246 ITR 90 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
BHARATIBEN JAYANTIBHAI THAKKAR VS TAX RECOVERY OFFICER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. null | Attachment of property |
---Recovery of tax---Attachment and sale of property---Property in name of wife of partner of defaulter-firm---Wife objecting to attachment on ground property in question acquired out of her own resources---Recovery Officer bound to Read More... |
2001 PTD 160 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of unquoted shares |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation of unquoted shares/ Rule 1D has to be applied -Wealth Tax Act, 1957/ Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R. 1D. The provisions of rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, are mandatory and the valuation of unquoted shares should be made in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1922 246 ITR 104 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS BIPIN VADILAL |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147 | Failure to disclose material facts |
Reassessment---limitation---Failure to disclose material facts--- |
2001 PTD 197 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
ONKARJIT SINGH KANWAR VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 2(m)(ii) | Debts incurred in relation to properties |
Net Wealth/ Deductions/ Debt/ Debts incurred in relation to properties which are exempt from wealth tax/ Not deductible/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, on a bare reading shows that deduction is not to be permitted where it Read More... |
2001 PTD 1922 246 ITR 104 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS BIPIN VADILAL |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.5(2)(b). | Non-resident |
---Non-resident---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Collaboration agreement--- Lump sum payment made under agreement by Indian company American company for transfer of know-how---Did not accrue or arise in India---Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 205 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS V.R.M. VALLIAPPA CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2) | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets/ Valuation made for earlier valuation date could not ipso facto be applied for valuation for later years. The valuation for wealth tax purposes is required to be made as on the valuation date and a report given with regard to the value made for Read More... |
2001 PTD 1926 246 ITR 801 |
|
Patna High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER INCOME- TAX VS DHAWAN INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961 28 | Premises taken on rent |
----Business expenditure---Premises taken on rent---Agreement for payment Of advance to be adjusted against rent---Finding by Tribunal that premises had been used for business purposes---Rent paid was deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 219 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes |
Reference/ Company/ Assets/ Motor cars and trucks used for business purposes/ Tribunal correct in holding that motor cars were includible in “net wealth” / -No question of law arose/ Finance Act, 1983, S.40(3)(vii)/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1928 246 ITR 800 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
KESHAB NARAYAN BANERJEE VS COMMISSION OF INCOME-TAX and another |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.148 & 282. | service of notice |
----Writ---Appeal---Procedure--- contained in O. 41,R 22 of Civil Procedure Code would apply---No appeal or cross-objection by respondent--- Respondent cannot raise issue at the time of appeal---Question regarding service of notice Read More... |
2001 PTD 233 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS Mrs. KUKU NARANG |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Penalty/ Concealment of wealth |
Penalty/ Reference/ Concealment of wealth/ Finding by Tribunal that there had been clerical errors and no concealment of wealth/ Finding of fact/ No question of law arose from it/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27. Held, that the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1929 246 ITR 198 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOPE (INDIA) LTD.
(NOW PODDAR UDYOG LTD.)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.5, 22 & 23. | Accrual of income |
-Income---Accrual of income—House property---Assessment maintaining accounts on mercantile system---Tenants agreeing to pay enhanced rent with retrospective effect---No accrual in year of account---Enhanced rent agreed to after Read More... |
2001 PTD 248 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS R. ARIFF AND OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.5(1)(iv) & 27 | Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm |
Reference/ Exemption/ Firm/ Partner/ Building owned by firm/ Commercial building also regarded as a house for purpose of S.5(1)(iv)/ Tribunal correct in holding that partner was entitled to exemption in respect of his share in firm in respect of property owned Read More... |
2001 PTD 1932 246 ITR 797 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
JUBILEE INVESTMENTS AND INDUSTRIES LTD. VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and other |
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. | Tax Deduction at source (TDS) |
----Deduction of tax at source---Delay in depositing TDS----Penalty----Levy of penalty justified though TDS deposited before ley of penalty---Liable to pay interest as well as penalty---Loss in business of assesses nothing to do with Read More...
|
2001 PTD 263 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
BHAGWANDAS JAIN AND 3 OTHERS
VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 | Reassessment notices/ Report of Valuation Officer |
Reassessment/ Assessment for assessment years 1979-80 to 1981-82 obtaining finality in 1984/ Reassessment notices issued in 1988 on basis of a report of Valuation Officer/ Report of Valuation Officer not called for during pendency of assessment but after completion Read More... |
2001 PTD 1934 246 ITR 632 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO. |
income Tax Act, 1961, S.221. | Business expenditure |
--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More... |
2001 PTD 273 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS Smt. SOMA WANTI SETHI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 27, 13 & 8 | Voluntary disclosure of wealth |
Voluntary disclosure of wealth/ Reference/ Assessee a partner in a firm/ Voluntary disclosure of income by firm/ Additions to net wealth of assessee on account of disclosure by firm/ Effect of non-compliance with S.13(2) read with S.8(1) of Voluntary Disclosure of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1940 246 ITR 683 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SUPER SCIENTIFIC CLOCK CO. |
income Tax Act, 1961 S.221 | Payment to foreign collaborator |
--Business expenditure--- Payment to foreign collaborator--- Mercantile system of accounting---Liability accrues and is deductible in year in which sum payable--- Not year in which assesse actually pays--- Procedure for obtaining Read More... |
2001 PTD 273 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS Mrs. R.B. PATEL |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss. 5(1)(viii) & 35 | Rectification of mistake |
Rectification of mistake/ Exemption/ Jewellery/ Wealth tax assessment completed excluding value of jewellery as falling under exemption/ Retrospective amendment to S.5(1)(viii) by Finance (No.2) Act, 1971, making jewellary liable to wealth tax/ Wealth Tax Officer Read More... |
2001 PTD 1944 246 ITR 341 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS JOSEPH RAJAPPAN AND OTHERS |
Income tax Act, 1961. Ss. 139 & 148. | Carry forward and set off |
--Loss---Carry forward and set off--- Return of loss filed pursuant to notice under S. 148 within time limit prescribed under S. 139(4)---Will be deemed to have been filed under S.139---Assesse entitled to carry forward Read More...
|
2001 PTD 278 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS KALAWATI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 2 & 256 | Agricultural income/ Capital gains |
Reference/ Agricultural income/ Capital gains/ Profits from sale of agricultural lands/ Law applicable/ Effect of Explanation to S.2(1-A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970/ Whether income arising from transfer of agricultural lands can be treated as Read More... |
2001 PTD 1946 246 ITR 465 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS YAMUNA DIGITAL ELECTRONICS (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.35. | Scientific research |
---Scientific research---No requirement that expenditure should be wholly and exclusively for research and development---Proportionate deduction on basis of part use of plant and machinery for research-Permissible---Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 282 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
VISHIN N! KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER VS VIDYA LACHMANDAS KHANCHANDANI AND ANOTHER |
Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, 1959 Ss. 6, 7 & 8 | National savings certificate/ Nomination |
National savings certificate/ Nomination/ Effect/ Upon death of holder, nominee entitled to receive sum under certificate without proof of title/ But retains such sum for benefit of persons entitled under law of succession/ Indian Government Savings Certificate Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1949 (2002)85 TAX 137 246 ITR 306 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
JJ I.T.C. LTD. and another VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 142 | Single Judge order |
----Assessment--Audit-Writ---Writ petition against order under S.142(2A) Order staying assessment proceedings and observing the payment of auditor”s fees would be considered at final hearing of writ petition---Order was Read More... |
2001 PTD 286 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS SMT. SHAKUNTLA MEHRA & 2 OTHERS |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.7 & 25 | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets/ Revision/ Powers of Commissioner/ Valuation of properties on the basis of average of cost of construction and rent capitalization method/ Order erroneous and prejudicial to interests of Revenue/ Commissioner adopting valuation on rental income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1959 246 ITR 501 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Law well settled |
--Reference-Law on point well-settled---Reference not to be called for--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. When the law is clear and well-settled on a particular point, there can be no Read More... |
2001 PTD 289 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS HARRISON CROSSFIELD (INDIA) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 2(18) | Company in which public are substantially interested |
Company in which public are substantially interested/ Definition/ Assess company formed to take over Indian business of widely held foreign company/ Foreign company to hold 40 percent, shareholding in assessee-company/ Scheme of amalgamation completed by High Court Read More... |
2001 PTD 1963 246 ITR 88 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDIAN TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Expenses to |
Reference-Export. markets development allowance-Weighted deduction---Whether expenditure was wholly and exclusively for particular purpose or partly so-Question of fact---No question arises for reference--- Expenditure must be shown to Read More... |
2001 PTD 289 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS ABDUL GANI BHAT |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.16 | Computation of net wealth and tax payable |
Assessment/ Procedure/ Computation of net wealth and tax payable need not be done in same sheet of paper/ Sum payable calculated on a separate sheet of paper which was signed by Assessing Officer on same date on which order computing net wealth was singed by him/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1965 246 ITR 607 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
CASHMER WOOLLEN AND SILK MILLS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. | Business income |
----Income---Business income---law applicable---Effect of introduction of cl.(iiia) in S.28 amendment of cl.(24) of S.2 with retrospective effect form 1-4-1962 by Finance Act, 1990---Premium earned on sale of import Read More...
|
2001 PTD 293 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS ANIL KUMAR |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3), 5(1)(iv) | Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition |
Net wealth/ Firm/ Partners--Addition in case of firm found by Tribunal to be intangible and not represented by assets/ Share of additions not includible in net wealth of partner/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Held, that under the Wealth Read More... |
2001 PTD 1968 246 ITR 38 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. PACIRSAMY NADAR VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256(2). | lottery ticket |
----Income from lottery---Encashment of lottery ticket by illegal exchange---Assessed as income form other sources---Question as framed did not arise for consideration--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,S.256(2).
Read More...
|
2001 PTD 295 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS ANOKHA SINGH |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.25 | Assessment order completed without inquiry |
Revision/ Powers of CWT/ Assessment order completed without inquiry/ Order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue/ CWT can revise such an order/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.25. Where the assessment is completed without any enquiry whatsoever the order of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1970 246 ITR 26 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | demonstration farm |
Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More... |
2001 PTD 298 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION MARKETING FEDERATION LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80 | Cooperative society/ Special deduction- |
Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Law applicable/ Amendment of S.80-P(2)(a)(iii) with retrospective effect/ Order passed by High Court in reference subsequent to amendment not taking note of amendment/ Writ petition challenging validity of amendment/ Direction Read More... |
2001 PTD 1974 246 ITR 486 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Business expenditure |
Business expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of farm equipment----Maintaining 200 acres demonstration farm to train salesmen and dealers-Farm expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively fr business--Deductible---Though incurred Read More... |
2001 PTD 298 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 18(1)(c) | Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property |
Penalty/ Concealment of wealth/ Declaration of value of property on basis of valuation report of approved value/ Difference in estimate of valuation between approved valuer and departmental valuer/ Assessee”s valuation bona fide/ No deliberate understatement/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1975 246 ITR 524 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS STEEL COMPLEX LTD. |
Capital or revenue expenditure |
---Capital or revenue expenditure---Assessee engaged in manufacture of steel---Incurring expenditure on installation of water treatment plant and fume extraction plant---Resulted in improvement in operation of existing systems with Read More... |
2001 PTD 310 |
||
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS Mrs. VIDYA MALHOTRA |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Questions of law and fact |
Reference/ Questions of law and fact/ Difference/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.27. Where the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1975 246 ITR 524 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. | Business expenditure |
----Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 319 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF, D.R VS IJAZ ALI BHATTI, ADVOCATE /A.R |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1963 R. 8(3) | Valuation of lands and buildings |
Valuation of lands and buildings/ Rented property, valuation of/ Value of rented out property was adopted higher than the Gross Annual Letting Value by the Department on the plea that property could fetch more rent than the one declared/ Validity/ Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2001 PTD 1981 246 ITR 524 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS NAVBHARAT ENTERPRISES (P.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Interest on agricultural loans |
---Business expenditure---Interest on agricultural loans---Assessee engaged in processing and export of tobacco---Interest allowable only on amount spent for raising tobacco, “not other crops---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. The assessee-company Read More... |
2001 PTD 319 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C. I. T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE VS MESSRS ITTEFAQ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 4(1) | Claim interest expense/ overdraft/ loan |
Assessee, in the year 1976-77 ran a textile mill and claimed interest expense of Rs.1,30,5,259 on account of overdraft/ loan availed by the company/ Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had advanced a sum of Rs.33,79,391 to a subsidiary company on which no Read More... |
2001 PTD 2119 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
METAL POWDER CO. LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(c). | Business expenditure |
---- Business expenditure---Amounts not deductible---Company---Commission paid to director---Disallowance---Commission paid is also remuneration---Is subject to ceiling limit prescribed under sub-cl. (i) of cl. (c) of S.40 of Income-tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 322 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM INDUSTRIES LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c) | Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure |
Business expenditure/ Company/ Ceiling on expenditure/ Assets used by director of personal purposes/ Burden of proving that assets were not used for personal purposes of directors in on company/ No proof that motor car was not used for personal purposes of director/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 2121 239 ITR 405 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
AVANI CORPORATION VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 147. | Reassessment |
-Reassessment---Limitation---Failure to disclose, material facts---Facts recorded as reasons to reopen assessment recorded and considered in assessment order--No failure to disclose material facts---Reassessment after four years not Read More... |
2001 PTD 325 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS JAYPEE DYEING HOUSE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 | Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation |
Depreciation/ Rate of depreciation/ Higher rate in case of manufacture/ Assessee dyeing, printing and bleaching artificial silk cloth/ Assess was not engaged in manufacture/ Not entitled to higher rate of depreciation/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32/ Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 2134 239 ITR 418 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS AMRITABN R. SHAH |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. | Purchase of shares |
---Income from other sources---Deduction---Condition precedent for allowance ---Expenditure must be with primary motive of earning income---Purchase of shares with view to acquiring controlling interest in company---Object was not to Read More... |
2001 P T D 334 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME-TAX VS TRAVANCORE CEMENTS LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37(3A) | Repairs expenses |
----Business expenditure---Disallowance---Repairs---Whether motor car expenses and repairs to car would fall under S.37(3A) for computing disallowance---Contrary views taken by Division Benches of High Court in CIT v. Navodaya (1997) 225 Read More... |
2001 PTD 338 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS GNANAMMBIGAL MILLS |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7). | Gratuity |
---Business expenditure---Gratuity---Insurance premium paid to L.I.C. under group gratuity scheme—Not deductible under S.37 of Indian Income Tax Act, 1961---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & 40A(7). |
2001 PTD 340 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOTEL SHAH & CO. VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Return filing |
---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search Read More... |
2001 PTD 342 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
CLOUTH GUMMIWERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and another VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Income deemed to accrue |
Non-resident---Income---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India--- fees for technical services fees paid to foreign company for services of engineers for supervising erection of project---taxable--- Air fare of engineers paid by Read More...
|
2001 PTD 364 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS RADIO TALKIES |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.48. | Capital gains |
----Capital gains---Computation of---Closure of business of assessee and sale of land and building---Payment of retrenchment compensation to ex- employees---Not expenditure wholly and exclusively for purpose of transaction of Read More...
|
2001 PTD 376 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
G. GANAGADHARN NAIR VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.80HHC & 256. | Export earnings premium |
----Reference---Tribunal recording finding without considering evidence--- Question referred cannot be answered--Matter has to be remanded---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,Ss.80HHC & 256.
The Read More...
|
2001 P T D 330 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
HOTEL SHAH & CO. VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 139(2) & 142(1). | Return filing |
---Best judgment assessment---Failure to file return within due date---Failure to respond to notices under Ss. 139(2) & 142 (1)--- Assesse submitting that it could not file return due to search and seizure--- Not acceptable as search and seizure was long after Read More... |
2001 PTD 342 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS D.K. TRADING CO. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256. | evading tax |
---Reference---Firm---Registration---Whether or not firm genuine and whether or not formed as device to evade tax---Finding of fact---No question of law arises---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256. |
2001 PTD 380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE) VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | Administration of justice |
----Adverse order---Before adverse order is passed against any party such party should be afforded full opportunity to meet the case and rebut evidence used against Read More... |
2001 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NARRY SONS, LAHORE (Messrs BARRY BROTHERS, LAHORE) VS COMMISfSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | cash sales |
---S.32---Rejection of accounts---Unverifiable portion of cash sales--- Rejection of such sales by Assessing Officer---Previous as well as in subsequent years the declared results of the assessee had been accepted--- Contention of the Read More... |
2001 PTD 406 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS TODI TEA CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Assessee, a tea company---Contract for supply of tea by assessee---Breach of contract by assessee---Payment of sum by assessee under settlement entered into between parties---Assessee following mercantile system Read More... |
2001 PTD 435 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs. NIDA-I-MILLAT (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE I, LAHORE |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | Gratuify |
----Allowable expenses---Gratuities payable to employees---Admissibility as expense against income of relevant years---Such amount is a proper charge on the income of the assessee and as such is admissible as an expense. Read More... |
2001 PTD 443 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS HINDUSTAN TELEPRINTERS LTD. |
income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 10(28) & 280ZB | Surtax |
Reassessment Information Company- Surtax- Computation of capital-Audit party bringing to notice of Assessing Officer failure to apply R.4-is not opinion as to law--Reassessment on basis thereof permissible---Indian Companies (Profits) Read More... |
2001 PTD 445 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE VS Messrs. NAWA-E-WAQT PUBLICATIONS LTD., LAHORE |
Income-tax Act, 1922 | Income from property |
----Ss.9, 10 & 66(1)---Income from property---Rejection of claim of assessee without cogent reasons---Assessing Officer treated the declared income from property under S.9 of Income-tax Act, 1922, and rejected the claim of the Read More... |
2001 PTD 455 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SIMPSON & CO. LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. | Capital, or revenue expenditure |
----Capital, or revenue expenditure---Expenditure to obtain technical know- how--General principles---Amount paid under collaboration agreement for acquiring technical know-how relating to manufacture of automobile engine---Technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 480 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS D.ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A). | Advance Tax |
---Advance Tax---Estimate filed---Failure to pay advance tax as per estimate filed---Interest cannot be levied---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 212(3A) & 217(1A). Although the obligation cast on Read More... |
2001 PTD 487 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS THANTHI TRUST |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.11. | Charitable trust |
---Charitable purpose---Charitable trust---Exemption---Credit entries in accounts of trust in favour educational institutions---Corresponding withdrawals by educational institution---Amounts to application of income---Trust entitled to Read More... |
2001 PTD 491 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SRI RAMALINGA CHOODAMBIGAI MILLS LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, Expln. 2 & 43(5) (a). | Damages paid for cancellation of contracts |
---Business expenditure--- Damages paid for cancellation of contracts for purchase of cotton as assessee decided to produce yarn of higher count---Hedging contracts and not speculative transaction---Deductible as revenue Read More... |
2001 PTD 495 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961. | Rental Income |
---Business Income---Rental Income---Superstructure on leasehold land let out to parties for limited period---Is income from business---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. Whether the plot of land was Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | maintenance of flat used for business |
---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
LUCAS TVS LTD VS COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 35B | Ceiling on expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Ceiling on expenditure---Company---Director who is also an employee and a foreign technician entitled to exemption under S.10(6) (viia)---Amount exempt under S.10(6)(viia) is not to be taken into account for fixing ceiling under Ss.40(c) Read More... |
2001 PTD 502 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Income Tax Act, 1961, S.32. | Depreciation |
---Depreciation---Flat used for business purpose---Flat standing in name of director and not assessee-Company---Facts not properly enquired into---Matter remanded---Depreciation not to be allowed if assessee fails to prove ownership of flat---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS SHREE SHEW SHAKTI MILLS (PVT.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 | maintenance of flat used for business |
---Business expenditure---Expenditure on maintenance of flat used for business purpose---Is allowable expenditure---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37 Maintenance allowance and depreciation allowance Read More... |
2001 PTD 498 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null VS null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 59, 59-A(2) & 59(3), 59A | Adjustment |
---Ss. 59-A(2) & 59(3)---C.B.R. Circular No.18 of 1980, dated 28th July, 1980---Addition---Powers of Assessing Officer to make addition---Scope---Assessing Officer was not empowered to make an addition of undisclosed income to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1043 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
A & M AGENCIES VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 194A, 201 & 231. | Payment of interest |
---Recovery of tax---Limitation---Deduction of tax at source---Payment of interest without deducting tax at source---ITO failing to treat assessee as an assessee in default by an order under S.201--- Initiation of proceedings for Read More... |
2001 PTD 505 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
TAMILNADU DAIRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.32. | ownership |
----Depreciation---"Owner", meaning of---Person who receives income from asset in his own right entitled to allowance---Legal ownership not condition in such a case---Refusal to grant depreciation solely for failure to produce registered Read More... |
2001 PTD 508 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS LUCAS INDIAN SERVICE LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Remuneration |
---Business expenditure---Remuneration to employees---General Principles---Pension paid to (widow of director--- Resolution passed while director was working for assessee-company authorising payment of pension to director and after his Read More... |
2001 PTD 514 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS V. RAMAKRISHNA SONS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 104, 155(7) | Additional tax |
----Rectification of mistakes---Company---Additional tax on undistributed profits---Rectification under S. 155(7) of order passed under S.104---I.A.C.”s approval not required---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.104 & 155(7). The approval of the Read More... |
2001 P T D 520 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
INDUSTRIAL CONSULTING BUREAU (P.) LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 144B | Municipal taxes |
----Deduction---Draft assessment order---Revised return---Deduction claimed in revised return after passing of draft assessment order---Cannot be entertained---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 144B. |
2001 PTD 524 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.145 & 256(2) | books of account |
Reference---Accounting---Finding that books of account had been maintained regularly and that no defects had been found in accounts--- Tribunal justified in holding that accounts could not be rejected under S.145---No question of law Read More... |
2001 PTD 526 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS VIKRAM PLASTICS AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) | Income from undisclosed sources |
---Reference-Income from undisclosed sources---Finding that explanation regarding consumption of raw materials was satisfactory---Tribunal justified in deleting addition to income---No question of law arose---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 526 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS PREMIER MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.3 & 32 | Depreciation |
---Previous year---Depreciation---Change in previous year---Power of Assessing Officer to impose conditions for such change---Assessing Officer cannot curtail statutory deduction admissible for such period---Assessing Officer agreeing to Read More... |
2001 PTD 530 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7) | Gratuity |
----Business expenditure---Gratuity amount relating to pre-nationalisation period---Debited to approved gratuity reserve---Gratuity paid to employees during year under assessment---Is allowable deduction---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 535 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS KERALA TRANSPORT COMPANY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Business expenditure |
----Business expenditure---Assessee carrying on transport business---Liability in respect of loss of goods---Liability under Carriers Act, 1865, is a. statutory liability--Provisions made in respect of such liability in accounts Read More... |
2001 PTD 539 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ARVIND H. SHAH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.256(2) | Promissory note |
----Reference---Promissory note found during a search of residential premises of assessee---Additions made in income of assessee during assessment year 1987-88 deleted by CIT (Appeals) on the ground that additions had already been made Read More... |
2001 PTD 545 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS REGIONAL SOYABEAN PRODUCTS COOPERATIVE UNION LIMITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 220, 220(2A), 143(2), 143(1), 143 | Procedure for assessment |
----Assessment---Procedure for assessment---Notice issued under S. 143(2)--- Assessing Officer cannot issue intimation under S.143(1)(a) thereafter--- Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.143. |
2001 PTD 548 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Mst. FARIDA BIBI VS I.T.O., CIRCLE 14, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 136 | Obligation of the High Court |
Reference to High Court/ Scope/ Obligation of the High Court to decide the questions of law referred to it was contingent upon the hearing of the case/ Hearing of the case could not be made unless the party at whose instance the questions had been referred to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 2137 84 TAX 186 239 ITR 418 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS M.K. RAJU CONSULTANTS (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 80, 80AB, 80B(5), 80-O | Special deduction |
----Special deduction---Income by way of fees for work done outside India--- Deduction of such fees from gross total income---Fees received from abroad constituted assessee”s gross receipt-Income from fees is to be computed in Read More... |
2001 PTD 556 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS Miss SRIPRIYA MAHESH |
Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 1D | Valuation of shares |
Valuation of shares---Tax liability of company upheld by High Court---Tax liability to be deducted for purpose of determining break-up value of the share of company---Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R.1-D. The assessee was a shareholder in a company, S, which Read More... |
2001 PTD 1624 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40(c)(ii) | Reimbursement of medical expense |
Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Company/ Reimbursement of medical expense and cash payment like house rent allowance paid to managing director are part of salary/perquisite for purpose of disallowance under S.40(c)(ii)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 2139 2391 ITR 416 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ENGINEERS INDIA LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Capital or revenue expenditure |
----Capital or revenue expenditure---Amount paid initially for acquiring membership of organisation entitling assessee to receive latest technical information---Membership to be renewed annually---Assessee did not acquire asset of Read More... |
2001 PTD 560 |
|
Rajasthan High Court India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS Smt. GULAB DEVI |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3) | Firm |
Reference---Valuation of assets—Firm---Valuation of closing stock given in balance-sheet---Burden on Revenue to prove that valuation was not correct and that market value exceeded it by more than twenty per cent.----Burden of Proof not discharged by Read More... |
2001 PTD 1629 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A(5). | Cash payments like house rent allowance |
Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Cash payments like house rent allowance paid to employees/ Is to be treated as salary for determining ceiling under S.40A(5)/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40A(5). The Tribunal was correct in holding that the cash payment Read More... |
2001 PTD 2139 2391 ITR 416 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 209A | Advance tax |
----Advance tax---Liability to pay advance tax---Obligation to file estimate-- Law applicable---Effect of S.209A inserted w.e.f. 1-6-1978---Order passed by Tribunal without considering effect of S.209A---Matter remanded--- Indian Income Read More... |
2001 PTD 564 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS HOME PLANNERS THROUGH MUHAMMAD AZEEM, PARTNER VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CIRCLE06, COYS, ZONEIII, LAHORE (NOW CIRCLE 14, COY ZONEII, LAHORE) AND 4 OTHERS. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 65(1), 65(2) | Reassessment |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Reassessment----Requirements for issuing notice under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Principles---Where the requirement postulated in S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 had not been met by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1633 |
|
Punjab and Haryana High Court (India) | 2001 |
STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.245 | Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable |
Refund/ Set-off of refund against sum payable under Income-tax Act/ Condition precedent/ Intimation mush be given to assessee prior to such set-off/ Indian Income Tax, Act, 1961 S.245. The following conditions must exist or be fulfilled in order to set off a Read More... |
2001 PTD 2145 239 ITR 421 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SUDARSAN CHIT (INDIA) LTD. (NO. 1) |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 36, 36(1)(v) | Contribution to approved gratuity fund |
----Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund--- Conditions precedent---Condition that employee should have rendered service for five years or more---Employees of holding company taken over by assessee---Service of Read More... |
2001 PTD 566 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
USMAN SAEED BUTT VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOMETAX, CIRCLE2 COM, ZONEI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 56, 58, 61 | Opinion / Decision |
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition----Issuance of notices under Ss.56, 58 & 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance in the names of a dead person---Fact that the person had died was within the knowledge of the Assessing Officer who instead Read More... |
2001 PTD 1647 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS CHENNAI PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.37 & 201(1A) | Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid |
Business expenditure/ Investment/ Interest paid under S.201 (1A) for failure to deduct tax at source and remit it to Central Government/ Interest is not deductible as business expenditure/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.37 & Read More... |
2001 PTD 2156 239 ITR 435 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
VS PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 | Interpretation of statutes |
---Taxing statute---Words in a taxing statute including notifications and orders, unless ambiguous, must be given their ordinary and natural meaning--Subject is not to be taxed unless the statute clearly imposes the burden of tax, while Read More... |
2001 PTD 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS ANSAR EXPORT ENTERPRISES LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ZONE B, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136 | Compensate |
Income---Customs rebate was direct income of the assessee---Principles---Rebate, discount and commission---Connotation. A rebate of tax when with reference to actual amounts earlier paid by a taxpayer is different from the one given with reference to the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1649 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE VS PUNJAB COOKING OIL LTD, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 13(1)(d) | Deemed income/ Addition |
Deemed income/ Addition/ Two separate and independent approvals of the I.A.C. for making additions to the declared income of the assessee were necessary at the relevant Read More... |
2001 PTD 2161 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. (PVT.) LTD
VS PAKISTAN and others Per Dr. Ghous Muhammad, J |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) | Deduction of income-tax at source |
S.52---Deduction of income-tax at source---Failure to deduct such income-tax---Effect---Assessee who fails to deduct income-tax at source is treated as "assessee in default"---Where payee/deductee pays his full tax, any shortfall in or Read More... |
2001 PTD 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
WELCON CHEMICALS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80, 50, 50(4), 50(5), 80C(4) | Deduction |
Deduction of tax at source----Assessee, deriving income from sale of pesticides---Income-tax was paid by the assesse under S.50(5) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 at the time of import---Department had asked the assessee to pay the income-tax as a supplier under Read More... |
2001 PTD 1656 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER VS ANUPCHAND & CO. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 32 | Depreciation/ Rate of allowance |
Depreciation/ Rate of allowance/ Higher rate applicable in case of business of hiring/ Assessee using trucks for own business and claiming depreciation on trucks at 40 percent/ 40 percent, applicable to vehicles used for hire business/ Assessee using trucks for own Read More... |
2001 PTD 2162 239 ITR 466 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Expenditure not incidental to business |
---S.136---Appeal to High Court---Maintainability---Where the decision rests on examination of the facts on record, the same would be a question of law as the question whether inference framed from give facts or not was a question of Read More... |
2001 PTD 609 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 31, 40A(7), 40A(7)(b), 154 | Surtax |
Business expenditure---Company---Surtax---Surtax is levied on profits of a company---Surtax is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. Business expenditure---Contribution to approved gratuity fund---Trust deed executed on 26-8-1970---Amendment of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1661 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS KARACHI HOSPITAL LTD. VS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A (NOW COMPANIES(III), KCY. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.23(i)(xviii) | Expenditure not incidental to business |
---S.23(i)(xviii)---Deduction---Expenditure not incidental to business---Refusal to allow such expenditure as deductions under S.23 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Expenditure of salaries made by the assesse was not deducted by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 609 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
AURO FOOD LTD
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and another |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 220(2A). | Waiver of interest |
The three conditions for grant of waiver of interest under section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are that (i) payment of such amount has caused or would cause genuine hardship to the assesse; (ii) default in the payment of the Read More...
|
2001 PTD 613 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS SESHASAYEE BROS. (PVT) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 28 | Accrual of income/ Time of accrual |
Income/ Accrual of income/ Time of accrual/ Managing agency agreement providing for remuneration at a certain percentage and a minimum remuneration/ Additional remuneration payable if it exceeded minimum after audited balance-sheet and profit and loss account were Read More... |
2001 PTD 2169 239 ITR 471 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.55 & 57 | Return |
---Ss.55 & 57---Revised return---Failure to reflect/mention figure of capital gains in the relevant column of the return---Revised return whether to be treated as one under S.57 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Return was initially Read More... |
2001 PTD 623 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS RAASI CEMENT LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 56 & 256 | Income or capital/ Other sources |
Reference/ Income or capital/ Other sources/ Tribunal justified in holding that interest earned on borrowed capital constituted capital receipts and that it was not assessable as income from other sources/ No question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.56 Read More... |
2001 PTD 2180 239 I T R 596 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Accrual of Income |
---Income---According---Accrual of Income---Time of accrual---Collaboration agreement with non-resident company---Amount received by assesse-company under agreement---Resolution of Board of Directors before entering into agreement that Read More...
|
2001 PTD 628 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS JAYALAKSHMI MILLS (PVT) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 40A | Business expenditure/ Gratuity |
Business expenditure/ Gratuity/ Conditions laid down in S.40A(7) must be fulfilled/ Remittance of amount less than that required statutorily/ -Assessee cannot claim lesser benefit not entitled to any deduction Income Tax Act.1961, S. 40A. Section Read More... |
2001 PTD 2185 239 ITR 605 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
Messrs NATIONAL BEVERAGES (PVT.) LTD
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.65 | Definite information |
---S.65---Definite information---Re-opening of assessment---Scope---Change of opinion of Income Tax Officer---Where assessee had disclosed all the material facts without concealment and the assessment had been consciously completed by Read More... |
2001 PTD 633 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
VS A. C. MAHESH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 45 | Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets |
Capital gains/ Firm/ Contribution of assets by partner constitutes transfer within the meaning of S.45/ Question whether capital gains arose when amount was credited in both capital account and current account of partner not considered by Tribunal/ Matter remanded/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 2189 239 ITR 616 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD. VS CHENNAI MURASU (P.) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Reassessment Escapment of Income |
---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment Information can be gathered from material relating to subsequent assessment year---Assessee publishing newspaper---Calculation of wastage of newsprint found to be excessive Read More... |
2001 PTD 650 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS BHAGWAT PRASAD P. PARIKH |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80U | Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability |
Special deduction/ Permanent physical disability/ Whether assessee suffers from permanent physical disability and whether disability results in substantially reducing his capacity to engage in gainful employment or occupation/ Are questions of fact/ Quantum of Read More... |
2001 PTD 2193 239 ITR 645 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
CHAMUNDI GRANITES (P.) LTD VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 269-SS & 271-D | Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits |
Penalty/ Evasion of tax/ Mode of taking loans and deposits/ Constitutional validity of provisions/ Section 269-SS stipulating that loans and deposits exceeding prescribed limit should be taken only by way of crossed cheques or crossed Bank drafts/ Section 271-D Read More... |
2001 PTD 2200 239 ITR 694 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S. 80P(2)(a)(i) | Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities |
Cooperative society/ Special deduction/ Interest on securities, subsidy from Government, interest from other cooperative institutions and Banks and dividends are entitled to special deduction under S.80P/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.80P(2)(a)(i). Interest Read More... |
2001 PTD 2208 239 ITR 700 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) SS. 13 & 111 | Unexplained investment |
---SS. 13 & 111---Unexplained investment---Concealment of income-tax Penalty---Retrospective effect of S.111(2)(c) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Income Tax Authorities imposed penalty on the assesse for having concealed the assets Read More... |
2001 PTD 668 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS VALIKA ART FABRICS LTD. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 19 & 22 | Rental income |
---S.19---Rental income---Premises/properties used for manufacturing process or business---Income derived by renting out such premises/properties---Such income to be treated as rental income---Failure to produce any material evidence to Read More... |
2001 PTD 672 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 9 & 44-D | Income deemed to accrue or arise in India |
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India/ Non-resident/ Business connection/ Agreement with resident for rendering technical services/ Amount paid by resident to non-resident treated by assessing authority as royalty and technical fees taxable under S.9(1)(vii) Read More... |
2001 PTD 2218 239 ITR 713 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS Miss AASIA FILM ARTIST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 46(1) | penalty |
---S.46(1)---Imposition of penalty---Principle of natural justice---Applicability---Show-cause notice, non-issuance of---Effect---Penalty was imposed on the assessee by the Income-tax Authorities under S.46(1) of Income-tax Act, 1922, Read More... |
2001 PTD 678 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS SUTLEJ TEXTILE MILLS, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 S. 34 | Assessee sold out his factory |
Reference to High Court/ Assessee sold out his factory but remained in possession/ Sale was revoked after two years/ Assessee filed turn on notice under S.34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 declaring loss and claimed that it was Custodian of Enemy Property who was Read More... |
2001 PTD 2232 84 TAX 284 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Importants |
---Meaning of word/expression in a particular section of statute---Reporting to ordinary dictionary meaning---Scope---Courts in assigning/defining the meaning of a word/expression has to take into consideration the object or the purpose Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS J. K. BERI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 147 & 256(2) | Reassessment |
Reference/ Reassessment/ Tribunal quashing reassessment on legal grounds alone without considering facts/ Question of law arose/ Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.147 & 256(2). Held, that since the Tribunal had stated that it had quashed the reassessment Read More... |
2001 PTD 2246 248 ITR 5 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.2(24) | net income |
---S.2(24)---Income as mentioned in S.2(24), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Connotation---Expression “income” does not mean “net income” after making all permissible allowances, deduction, depreciations Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE VS Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 5(1)(c) & 136 | Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities |
Jurisdiction of Income-tax Authorities/ Reference to High Court/ Assessment order had to be made by the Deputy Commissioner of the Income-tax while such privilege, in respect of certain classes of persons or cases, could very well be exercised by a person higher in Read More... |
2001 PTD 2247 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 23 & 136(1) | Description on assets given on |
---Ss. 23 & 136(1)---Depreciation on leased assets---Refusal to allow the depreciation form net income from lease rentals---Assessee being dissatisfied with the assessment filed appeal before Appellate Authority---Assessment framed Read More... |
2001 PTD 682 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE VS Messrs A. L, HAMIDI, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss. 136 & 66-A(1) | Authority equal in status |
Reference to High Court/ Authority equal in status/ Power of revision/ Authority equal in status could Read More... |
2001 PTD 2247 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
THANJAI MURASU (P.) LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.147(b) | Esculent of Income |
---Reassessment---Information that income had escaped assessment---Information can be gathered from material, relating to subsequent years---Assessee publishing newspaper---Wastage of newsprint found to the excessive on comparison with Read More... |
2001 PTD 690 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
SHER SINGH (HUF) VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 27 | Acquisition of land by Government |
Net wealth/ Acquisition of land by Government/ Right to receive compensation/ Value of right to receive compensation on date alone includible in assessee”s net wealth/ Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Reference/ Appeal to Appellate Tribunal/ Additional Read More... |
2001 PTD 2249 247 ITR 103 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SOUTH INDIA CORPORATION AGENCIES (P.) LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40A & 147. | Failure to disclose material facts |
---Reassessment---Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment---Company---Failure to give full details of expenses which could be disallowed under S.40A(5)---Reassessment proceedings were valid---Indian Income Tax ACT, Read More... |
2001 PTD 693 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
K. GOVINDAN & SONS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 139 & 147 | Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns |
Return/ Interest/ Reassessment/ Delay in filing returns/ Meaning of “regular assessment”/ Assessment made for first time under S.147 is a regular assessment/ Interest under S.139(8) could be levied in case of such an assessment/ Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 2258 247 ITR 192 |
|
Gauhati High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS JOHN FOWLER (INDIA) LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Income from undisclosed sources |
---Income from undisclosed sources---Reference---Finding that particular amount did not constitute income from undisclosed sources---Finding of fact---Tribunal justified in deleting amount from income---Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 700 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS ATTUR THULUVA VELLALAR SANGAM |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S. 5(1)(i) | Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity |
Exemption/ Charitable trust/ Trust need not be wholly and exclusively engaged in charitable activity/ Sufficient if primary object of trust is charitable/ Trust having as its main object imparting of education and other objects of general public utility/ Collection Read More... |
2001 PTD 1898 243 ITR 774 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.254 | Tribunal |
---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal has power to admit addition ground of appeal---Tribunal has power to remand matter ITO-Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254. Held, that Read More... |
2001 PTD 708 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
GANDHI TRADING VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.281B | attachment of property |
---Provisional attachment of property---Provisional attachment of property during pendency of assessment proceedings---Condition precedent for provisional attachment---Sufficient material on record to show that assessee would dispose of Read More... |
2001 PTD 711 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. | Interest on securities |
---Interest on securities---Assessability---Interest on securities assessable on due basis---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.18. On a bare reading of section 18 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is clear Read More... |
2001 PTD 717 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18. | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---Payment of market fees to Market Committee---Payment exceeding Rs.2,500 by cash disallowed by ITO---Miscellaneous application by assessee before Tribunal enclosing letter from Market Committee that committee not Read More... |
2001 PTD 720 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS PADMAVATI RAJE COTTON MILLS LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.18 | interest |
The Income-tax Officer had also disallowed a sum of Rs.41,666 representing provision made for liability for interest payable to the Haryana Government on arrears of purchase tax by invoking section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. But Read More... |
2001 PTD 720 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SUHASHBHAI VADILAL |
Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.45 & 48. | Sale of shares |
---Capital gains---Sale of shares---Computation of capital gains---Deduction of costs of acquisition of shares---Shares held in a company---Sales of entire unit of company located in Bombay to a new company formed by it---Shareholders of Read More... |
2001 PTD 725 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. L. SWAMY VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 271(1)( c ) & 273A | Concealment of income |
Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More... |
2001 PTD 735 |
|
Karnataka High Court (India) | 2001 |
K. L. SWAMY VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271(1)(c) & 273A. | Penalty |
Penalty---Concealment of income---- Waiver of reduction of penalty --- Condition precedent ---- Disclosure by filing return voluntarily and in good faith --- Meaning of expression “voluntarily and in good faith”--- Finding Read More... |
2001 PTD 735 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null VS null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) null | Casual |
Casual income---Word “casual”---Connotation---Assessee was Director-employee of a company and certain amount of loan advanced to him during his service with the company was waived by the employer company at the time of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1047 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
null VS null |
Finance Act, 1991 12, I2(12)(d), 12(1) | Fixed Assets |
---S.12---Corporate Assets Tax---Levy---Validity---Fixed assets---Meaning---“Work in progress” being full covered by the term “fixed assets” as used in S.12(12)(d), Finance Act, 1991 was chargeable to capital assets, tax under S.12(1) read Read More... |
2001 PTD 1052 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null VS null |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 5(1), 13(2), 66A, 5(a)(c)(cc), 13 | Unexplained Investment |
---Ss.13(2), 5(1) & 66-A---Unexplained investment---Newly-acquired assets by assessee---Failure of assessee to file objection when required by the Assessing Officer---Effect---Enhancement of income of assessee by Assessing Read More... |
2001 PTD 1059 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
V.T. VENKATESWARAN VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 2(m)(iii) | Unexplained investment |
---Deductions---Wealth Tax liability as finally assessed is deductible---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The assessee is entitled to claim for deduction of the wealth tax liability as finally assessed or determined by the Wealth Tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 1064 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS L. BUSAPPA KUMAR |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 2, 2(IA), 45, 256 | Unexplained investment |
---Reference---Capital gains---Transfer of agricultural lands---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.2(1A) with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970—Question whether capital gains could be levied on gains arising on transfer of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1066 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS MAHENDRA MILLS and 2 Others |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 28, 29, 32, 34 | Unexplained investment |
---Depreciation---Assessee not claiming Read More... |
2001 PTD 1068 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Accrual of income |
---Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry----On a writ, High Court by interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixed by Government----Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse in excess of Read More... |
2001 PTD 743 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS KESAR SUGAR WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Interest |
----Business expenditure---Interest—Sugar industry---Price realised in excess of levy price fixed by Government—High Court directing refund excess with interest at the rate of 12 per cent. Per annum—Liability to pay Read More... |
2001 PTD 743 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO VS H. H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JUDEO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.37 | Interest (money) |
----Business expenditure---Interest---Money borrowed for paying income-tax---Interest on money borrowed is not deductible---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.37. |
2001 PTD 749 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Accrual of income |
----Income---Accrual of income---Sugar industry---On a writ, High Court interim order allowing assesse to realise price in excess of levy price fixe by Government---Dispute regarding price---Amount realized by assesse excess of levy Read More... |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
S.S.M. BROTHERS (P.) LTD. AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 33, 33(1)(b)(B)(i); Sched. V, | Unexplained investment |
---Development rebate---Textile machinery---Machinery used for production of textile “including those otherwise processed”---Machinery used at any stage of production eligible for higher rebate---Assessee purchasing cloth and Read More... |
2001 PTD 1103 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.8 | Accrual of income |
--S.8---Power of Central Board of Revenue—Scope---Central Board of Revenue can only issue clarification and is not empowered to give any meanings to any provisions of the statute through its own interpretation. Read More... |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SHARDA SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.52 | Deduction of tax at source |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- |
2001 PTD 750 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS NASEER MUGHIS LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.T., LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 23, 23A, 23D, 23(2), 23(1) | dividend or bonus |
---S. 23 A---Assessment—Undistributed dividend or bonus---Double taxation---Income-tax Authorities imposed tax on the assesse-company on the basis of undistributed profit as income under the provisions of S.23A of Income-Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 772 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PESHAWAR VS MESSRS GUL COOKING OIL AND VEGETABLE GHEE (PVT.) LTD, AND OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.50(5), 56 & 63 | Accrual of income |
---Ss.50(5), 56 & 63---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185(3) & 247—Notification No. S.R.O. 593(1)/91, Dated 30-6-1991—Advance income-tax exemption of---Deducting of such tax on the goods imported by assesse to Read More... |
2001 PTD 778 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs KHURRAM SAGHIR INDUSTRIES, LAHORE
VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE A, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1) | Approval |
----Ss.13(1)(2) & 136(1)---Re-assessment---Requirement of prior approval---Object---Income-tax Authorities without prior separate approvals made assessments under Ss.13(1) & 13(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Contention by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 781 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS HABIB CREDIT & EXCHANGE BANK LIMITED VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.136 | Capital Asset |
---S.136---Banking Companies Ordinance (LVII of 1962), S.13---Appeal to High Court---Banking company---Question of treatment given by the department to the money acquired by Banking company from surrender/sale of Federal Investment Bonds Read More... |
2001 PTD 785 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE
VS Messrs AL-GHAZI TRACTOR LIMITED, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Warranty Commission |
---Warranty Commission---Unexpired warranty commission---Not a revenue receipt---Principles. |
2001 PTD 789 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Penal interest |
---Deduction---Penal Read More... |
2001 PTD 793 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2001 |
MUHAMMAD HANIF AND 21 OTHERS VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.16 & 19 | Effect/ retrospectively |
---Ss.16 & 19 [as amended by Finance Act (IX of 1996)]---Notification No.C-1/167-1/ITP/86, dated, 16-7-1996--- imposition of tax---Explanation added to S.19, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 did not speak of its applicability with Read More... |
2001 PTD 795 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS MIAN MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS C.I.T., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2(24), 27, 27(2)(a)(ii), 13, 136, 151 | Capital gain |
---Ss. 27, 151 & 2(24)---Capital gain---Exemption---Sale of land by Company---Share of Director/shareholder of the Company in the sale proceeds of land of assesse-Company----Taxability----“Income” as defined in S.2(24), Read More... |
2001 PTD 1222 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS P.M. ITOOP |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Schedule III | Valuation of property |
----Valuation of residential house----Method of valuation----Law applicable---Schedule III to Wealth Tax Act introduced with effect from 1-4-1989---Amended provisions applicable to all pending proceedings--- wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 P T D 1228 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS J. ABDUL KHADER SAIT AND ONOTHER |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 null |
---Valuation of assets---Valuation of land with buildings thereon---Yield or rental method of valuation is proper---Value cannot be enhanced by adding reversionary value of land---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. In valuing lands with Read More... |
2001 P T D 1230 |
||
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS D. KRISHNA MURTHY |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 7(4) | Valuation of assets |
----Valuation of assets---land belonging to HUF----Building on land belonging to Karta of HUF in individual capacity---Building used by HUF as residential house---Section 7(4) applicable for valuation purposes---Land and building to be Read More... |
2001 P T D 1233 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS KARNAL COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 null | Income of capital |
---Income of capital---Amounts deposited to open letter of credit for purchase of machinery required for setting up plant----Interest on such amount is directly connected and incidental to construction of plant---Interest was a capital Read More... |
2001 P T D 1236 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS CADILA CHEMICALS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 256 | Business expenditure |
----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Amount paid as premium for purchase of deferred annuity policies in respect of Managing Director----Whether allowable---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Read More... |
2001 P T D 1238 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
ALANKAR COMMERCIAL (PVT.) LTD VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 4, 148 | Charge of tax |
---Charge of tax---Income accruing of arising in India is chargeable to tax under Income-tax Act----Company having its registered office in Sikkim---Notice under S.148 in respect of.income accruing or arising in India to such Read More... |
2001 P T D 1240 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS INDIAN LEAF SPRING MANUFACTURING (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A, 40A(5), 40(c), 256 | Perquisites to directors and employees |
----Reference---Business expenditure---Company---Disallowance of expenditure---Perquisites to directors and employees---Insurance permia paid by company on behalf of employee-director---Whether could be disallowed under S. 40A(5) for Read More... |
2001 P T D 1241 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED, AVARI PLAZA, HILTON HOTEL, SHAHRAH-E-QUAID-E-AZAM, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10 | Capital expenditure |
----Capital expenditure---Determination---Requirements---Assessee engaged in the business of transmission and distribution of gas had paid certain amount to the Provincial Irrigation Department for additional protective work built on Read More... |
2001 PTD 798 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Mrs. ISMAT KAMAL
VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX CIRCLE-II, ZONE-C, LAHORE and 2 others |
Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963) S. 31-B | Self assessment |
---S. 31-B---C.B.R. Circular No.5 of 1994, dated 19-9-1994---Additional wealth tax---levy of additional wealth tax was not mandatory---Value of rented out house was declared by the assesse on the basis of Annual Rental Value after Read More... |
2001 PTD 807 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE
VS NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S. 59 | Self assessment |
---S. 59---C.B.R. Circular No.4 of 1996, dated 1-7-1996 C.B.R. Circular No.16 of 1996, dated 3-9-1996---C.B.R. Letter C. No. 7(27)/S.Asstt./96, dated 2-6-1996---Self assessment---“Broad-based Self-Assessment Scheme” for Read More... |
2001 PTD 811 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE VS NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6 | provision or reserves |
---Ss.2(7), 10(2), (7) & First Sched , R,6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Fourth Sched. , R.5(a) [as amended by Finance Ordinance (XXV of 1980)]---Deduction---Insurance business---“Provision of a reserve” as Read More... |
2001 PTD 814 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE VS NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. LTD., LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 | Amendment |
Amendment brought about by Finance Act, 1980 was only prospective and that in case of pending assessments at the relevant time the Assessing Officer could not go beyond the provisions of rule 5 of the Fourth Schedule as originally made. Read More... |
2001 PTD 814 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.40(a)(v) & 40(c) | Remuneration to employees |
----Business expenditure----Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Remuneration to employees---Remuneration for employment outside India not to be taken into account for purposes of computing ceiling---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 818 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40(a)(v) & 40(c) | weighted deduction |
---Export markets development allowance---weighted deduction---Condition precedent---Not necessary that exports should be made directly from India---Expenditure Incurred on export of tea from East Africa to U.K---Entitled to weighted Read More... |
2001 PTD 818 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
H.H. MAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH JU DEO
VS WEALTH TAX OFFICER and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.17 | Escapment of Income |
Reassessment---Condition precedent---Reason to believe that wealth had Reassess escaped assessment---WTO must have material for such belief-Assessee submitting returns and giving details regarding foreign shares and stocks... Original Read More... |
2001 PTD 822 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
MKS. MOHD. ABOOBACKER SAHEB
VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5(1)(xviii) | award and reward |
---Exemption---Award---Difference between award and reward---Reward received by a tax informer is not an award---Not entitled to exemption Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(xviii). There is a Read More... |
2001 PTD 831 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS S.V. SIVARATHINA PANDIAN |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 25(2), 16A | Revision |
---Revision---Powers of CWT---Meaning of “Record” for purposes of revision---Record includes material available at time of examination by Valuation Officer Under S.16A---Report of Valuation Officer received after completion Read More... |
2001 PTD 855 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS B. CHANDRASEKHARA RAO |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R.2 | Minor |
Exemption---House property---Firm---Minor---Minor admitted to benefits of partnership---House property owned by firm---Minor entitled to exemption under S.5(1)(iv) in respect of his share in such house property--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 835 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D. | Valuation of assets |
Valuation of assets---Valuation of unquoted equity shares---Deductions--- Liability towards sales tax penalty---Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal modifying order of penalty subsequent to valuation date---Subsequent order must be taken into Read More... |
2001 PTD 843 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS M.V. ARUNACHALAM and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 R. 1D | Valuation of property |
Valuation of property--Reference to Valuation Officer---Valuation requested for a number of assessment years---Completion of assessment for one of assessment years before valuation report was received---Valuation was not Read More... |
2001 PTD 843 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX WEALTH TAX VS V. RANGNATHAM CHETTY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Trustee |
----Representative assessee---Trustee---Assessee sole surviving trustee endowed with all rights over properties---Rights given to assessee modified by supplementary deed confining right to assessee to first floor of property---Assessee Read More... |
2001 PTD 857 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAWALPINDI VS MESSRS AMANAT ALI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Reopening of assessment |
----Ss. 65, 59(1) & 13(1)(b)---Reopening of assessment--- Scope and extent---Self Assessment Scheme---Unexplained investment---Once the assessment was re-opened under s.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on one specific- issue, the Read More... |
2001 PTD 860 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt VS Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D | Representative assessee |
S.6--Exemption---Applicability---Question whether the case was covered under S.6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 was a question of fact, which required appreciation of the facts and circumstances of the Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt VS Mrs. Talat Altaf, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 66, 6, 80, (126-D) & S.66-A, 80-D | Interpretation of statutes |
Preamble---Preamble could be used in aid of the interpretation but if the main provision was clear in its application, Preamble was not to be read in as a part of the same---Preamble was not a part of statute and while interpreting a Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Shahbaz Butt VS Talat Altaf |
Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992) 6, (126)-D, 14, | Protection of Economic Reforms |
S.6---Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979), Second Sched., Part I, cl. (126-D)---Exemption---Words used "otherwise notified" in S.6 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992--Connotation---Section 6 of the Economic Reforms Act, 1992 Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 865 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE VS MESSRS CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) | Protection of Economic Reforms |
S.65-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S.34---Re-opening of assessment under S.65, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Limitation---Extended time of limitation after enforcement of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 under $65 could not be made Read More... |
2001 PTD 874 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
Iqbal Khawaja VS Mian Manawar Ghafoor, D.R. |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50 | Securities |
---“Securities”---Meaning---Term “securities” means and includes such documents which company issued in recognition of one”s share in business and assets of the company which entitled the securities holders Read More... |
2001 P T D (Trib.) 876 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Determination of status |
---Ss.2(16)(c), 2(30) & 2(40)(c)---Company---Non-resident or resident—Determination of status—Company/assesse was registered in U.S.A.—Branch Office in Pakistan claimed “resident status” being permanent Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) S.12(5)(a) | Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan |
---S.12(5)(a)---Income deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan---Fee for technical services---Fiction of place---Fees paid to non-resident were deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan under S.12(5)(a)of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 if technical services were utilized Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS B.D. GOENKA |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62 | Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Ss.80-AA, 12(5)(a), 30(2)(b), 22 & 62---C.B.R. Circular No.2(3)IT/2, dated 20-11-1982---Convention between Government of Pakistan and Government of U.S.A. for Avoidance of Double Taxation, Arts. II(1), III(1). & III(3)---Tax on Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 888 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF-INCOME-TAX, LAHORE
VS MESSRS IMMION INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Reference to High Court |
S.136--Reference to High Court---Purpose and scope---Where the answer to a question is applicable to a certain assessee only in a particular year and is not of general application, a reference to the High Court need not be Read More... |
2001 PTD 900 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS B.D. GOENKA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 | Additions |
---Net wealth---Assessee, partner in firm---Additions made to book profit of firm in assessment proceedings under Income-tax Act on account of exploitation of customs clearance certificates---Share of assessee in income derived by firm Read More... |
2001 PTD 906 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS M.K. ABDUL KHADER HAJI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 | Exemption |
---Exemption---Moneys and assets brought by Indian citizen ordinarily residing abroad who returns with intention of residing in India permanently---Law applicable---Effect of amendment of S.5(1)(xxxiii) w.e.f. 1-4-1987---Remittances made Read More... |
2001 PTD 908 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS HARIBHAI ESTATE (PVT.) LTD |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 S.5 | Interest on fixed deposits |
---Reference---Business---Other sources---Interest---Interest on fixed deposits, temporary loans and arrears of sales deposit---Whether income from business or from other sources---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.28, 56 Read More... |
2001 PTD 915 |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS KIKABIs EDUCATIONAL TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13 | Charitable trust |
---Charitable purposes---Charitable trust---Exemptions---Denial of exemption where trust funds are diverted for benefit of persons mentioned in S.13---Educational trust---Trustees partners in firms---irrevocably assigning share income Read More... |
2001 PTD 917 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
EIMCO K.C.P. LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(1) | Business expenditure |
---Business expenditure---General Principles---Capital or Revenue expenditure---Technical know-how---New company floated by Indian company and foreign company giving its technical now-how and obtaining equity shares in new company---Amount attributable to technical Read More... |
2001 PTD 918 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Heads of income |
---Heads of income-General principles relating to deduction under various heads of income---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. The following principles may be laid down; (i) of the income of an assessee is Read More... |
2001 PTD 925 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VS A.R. BALARAMAN and another |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(1)(xxxii) | Exemption |
---Exemption---Firm---Partner---Industrial undertaking---Condition precedent---Manufacture of article---Firm purchasing silk yarn and getting cloth manufactured by weavers who on their own machines wove the material supplied by Read More... |
2001 PTD 931 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. THE NIZAMs SUPPLEMENTAL FAMILY TRUST VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss. 143, 147 & 237 | Reassessment/ Refund |
---Reassessment---Assessment---Return---Refund---Return filed alongwith application for refund is a valid return---Reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated so long as assessment proceedings are not terminated---Application for refund Read More... |
2001 PTD 933 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS K. SITALAKSHMI |
Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957 | Charge of tax/ Minor |
---Charge of tax---Minor---Trust created for benefit of minor---Income of trust to be accumulated and handed over to minor on her attaining majority---Income from trust held not to be assessable in the hands of minor in Income-tax Read More... |
2001 PTD 944 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.11 & 13. | Loan to the employee |
When an appeal is dismissed by the Supreme Court by a non-speaking order, the order of the High Court or the Tribunal from which the appeal arose, merges with that of the Supreme Court. In such a case, the Supreme Court upholds the Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A | interest |
For the assessment year 1979-80, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee, which was a company, was borrowing large sums by paying interest at 15 per cent. per annum. This interest was claimed by the assessee as deductible Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
V.M. SALGOCAR & BROS. (PVT.) LTD AND OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 17, 17(2) & 40A(5), 40A | interest |
In assessments of a director of the same company, for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82, the Income-tax Officer held that non-charging of interest on his debit balance with the company would amount to a perquisite in the hands of Read More... |
2001 PTD 946 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 | Appellate Tribunal |
---Reference---Finding of fact---Scope of jurisdiction of High Court---Appellate Tribunal is the final fact-finding Authority---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and arrive at a conclusion contrary to that of the Tribunal---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256, 143, 271 | High Court |
---Assessment---Tribunal considering evidence and holding certain amounts to the income of the assessee---Assessment was valid---High Court had no power to reconsider evidence and hold at amounts did not form part of the assessee-s Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS D.L.F. UNITED |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 Ss.256 & 271 | penalty orders |
---Penalty---Concealment of income---Tribunal upholding additions to income in quantum proceedings and consequently confirming penalty---High Court reconsidering evidence and deleting additions to income and penalty---High Court was not Read More... |
2001 PTD 968 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Ss.11 & 13. | Exemption |
---Exemption---Firm---Partner entitled to exemption in respect of agricultural lands held by firm to extent of his share---Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.5(1)(iv). Held, that the assessee who was a Read More... |
2001 PTD 972 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS V.M. SP. L.AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 5(IA), 27(1) | Appellate Tribunal |
---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Tribunal can allow new ground to be raised before it---Question regarding valuation of property---Tribunal was justified in allowing Revenue to raise question whether property in Read More... |
2001 PTD 972 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
VS M. K. CHANDRAKANTH |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 4(1)(a) | Net wealth |
---Net wealth---Inclusions in net wealth---Assets transferred to minor child---Trust for benefit of minor child---Trust held irrevocable by High Court---Contributions to trust were not includible in net wealth of assessee---Indian Wealth Read More... |
2001 PTD 978 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SUNDARAM SPINNING MILLS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.24 | Depreciation |
---Depreciation---Initial depreciation---Higher rate of initial depreciation---Manufacture of textiles---Effect of Entry of Entry 21 of Ninth Sched.---Textiles would include yearn---Manufacture of yearn entitled to higher rate of initial Read More... |
2001 PTD 980 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS GOSLINO MARIO AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 9 | Income deemed to accrue |
---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Salary and allowances of foreign technician---Law applicable---Explanation to S.9(1)(ii) applicable only from 1-4-1979---Salary and allowances paid by Indian company to Italian concern for Read More... |
2001 PTD 985 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
null VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | sufficient cause |
---Appeal---Limitation---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of delay---Sufficient cause---Determination---Principles---Plea of “rush of work” for condonation of delay by no stretch of imagination was a “sufficient Read More... |
2001 PTD 1040 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
TANVIR ELAHI, DIRECTOR, ELAHI ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE
VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-13, COMPANIES ZONE-II LAHORE and 2 others |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Bank |
---Ss.80-B read with First Sched., Part I, 50(2-A) & 30---Income from dividends and Bank deposits---Interpretation and scope of S.80-B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Assessee, an individual derived income from salary and Read More... |
2001 PTD 1032 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS NATIONAL REFINERY LTD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 80 CC , 50(SA) | Rectification of mistake |
---Ss.80CC & 50(5A)---C.B.R. Circular No.14 of 1993, dated 19-8-1993---Tax on certain exporters---Assessee/exporter cannot be charged to tax under S.80CC of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 once the assessee/exporter establishes that Read More... |
2001 PTD 1030 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 156, 35, 30 | Rectification of mistake |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss.156, 35 & 30---Rectification of mistake---Carry forward of business loss---Income from other sources---Interest income---Business income---Business loss---Carried forward---Set off against Read More... |
2001 PTD (Trib.) 1017 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS MESSRS DURATHENE MANUFACTURERS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Affidavit |
---Ss.131, 148 & 158---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.129, illus. (e) & 1(2)---Appeal -Affidavit filed by the assessee assailing the consent assessment-----Provision of S.131, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 being mandatory in Read More... |
2001 PTD 1002 |
|
Bombay High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS TRADE WINGS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40(c), 40A(5) | Ceiling on Expenditure |
Business expenditure---Company---Ceiling on expenditure---Expenditure resulting in remuneration, amenity or benefit to employee or Director---Scope of Ss.40(c) & 40A(5)---Expenditure should result in remuneration amenity or benefit to employee or Director in his Read More... |
2001 PTD 1666 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SHIRAZI INVESTMENT |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 131, 136 | fresh evidence/materia |
---Ss. 136 & 131---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Procedure---New or fresh evidence/material was not permissible to the brought on the record by the Appellate Tribunal at the stage of Second Appeal.Memoona Ahmed v. The A.C.I.T. 1998 Read More... |
2001 PTD 999 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Gross profit rate |
---Gross profit rate---Assessee, a manufacturer of ghee, cooking oil and soap---Declaration of loss by the assessee---Assessing Officer Applied 4% gross profit rate against the 5.81% and 3.82% declared rate for the previous Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | declared sale |
---Loss---Closure of business on account of loss---Declaration of sale for six months only---Addition---Addition was made by making comparison with the previous years---Validity---Assessing Officer was directed by the Tribunal to accept Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Different sale rate |
---Trading account---Defective accounts---Different sale rate for different parties---Admissibility---Reduced sale rate for one party as compared to the other parties---Rejection of account was upheld by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Declared Sale |
---Sale---Considerable improvement in sale as declared in the previous years---Assessee showed considerable improvement in the declared sales than the last two years---Assessing Officer estimated the sales---Validity---Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan | 2001 |
Muhammad Iqbal Hashmi VS Sajjad Ali, D.R. |
null null | Trading Account |
---Trading account---Assessee, manufacturer of ghee and cooking oil etc.---Foreign exchange losses and leakage of material at customer;s store---Treatment---Principles---Charge of foreign exchange losses and leakage of goods at Read More... |
2001 PTD 994 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ORIENT PHARMA (P.) LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 40, 40A(7)(a), 40A(7)(b), 40A(7)(b)(1), 40A(7)(b)(ii) | Gratuity |
----Business----expenditure---Disallowance---Gratuity---Conditions for allowance of provision for gratuity---Scope of S.40A(7)----No approved gratuity fund created in relevant previous year---No amount paid as gratuity during financial year----Deduction claimed not Read More... |
2001 PTD 1672 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) | Exemption |
Exemption from income-tax was not allowed to the assessee by the Tribunal---Appeal to High Court---Finding of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal that assessee, a Girls College, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot be sustained Read More... |
2001 PTD 987 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2001 |
MEHRAN GIRLS COLLEGE VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) . | Assessment |
---S.2(7)---Assessment---Assessment relating to each assessment year in an absolutely different and independent proceeding under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which does not permit the findings of a particular assessment year to be Read More... |
2001 PTD 987 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2001 |
Mansoor Ahmed, D.A. G./L.A. and Riaz Hussain Shah, D.R VS |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 2, 2(16)(bb), 2(32), 22, 23, 23(1), 23(1)(xii), 23(1)(xiii), 23(1)(xiv), 23(1)(xv), 23(1)(xviii), Second Sched. | Welfare |
---S. 2(16)(bb), (32) & First Sched., Part I, para (A)---Company---Trust---Army welfare Trust---Status---Army Welfare Trust was previously carrying name of Army Welfare Projects Fund which was registered under the Societies Read More... |
2001 PTD 1243 |
|
Gujarat High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS KIRIT WOOD WORKS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 184, 185, 187, 188, 184(7), 184(8), 185(4) | Continuation of Registration |
Firm----Registration---Continuation of registration---Change in constitution of firm----Difference between dissolution of a firm and a change in its constitution---Application in Form No.11-A has to be filed in case of change in constitution of firm---Registration Read More... |
2001 PTD 1675 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, LAHORE VS MESSRS INTERHOME IMPERIAL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, LAHORE |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 10, 10(2)(xvi) | Allowable deduction |
S.10(2) (xvi)--- Interpretation of S, 10(2)(xvi), Income-tax Act, 1922--- Provision of S. 10(2)(xvi) of the Act only prohibited claiming and allowing of an expenditure which was in the nature of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1286 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS ANAND THEATRES AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(v), 43, 43(3) | Depreciation |
(a) Income-tax--- |
2001 PTD 1288 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, A-ZONE, LAHORE VS SOHAIL ASLAM, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 58, 108, 110, 136 | Wealth Statement |
Wealth Statement---Non-compliance of requirement of filing wealth statement---Penalty---Validity---Penalty under S. 108 , Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for default in submitting wealth statement as required under S. 58 of the said advance Read More... |
2001 PTD 1325 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS CARBORANDUM UNIVERSAL LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 37, 37(5) | Guest House |
Business expenditure---Depreciation---Guest house---Law applicable---Effect of introduction of subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from 1-4-1979---Subsection (5) of S.37 by Finance Act, 1983, with retrospective effect from Read More... |
2001 PTD 1685 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION |
HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION 3 | Association of persons |
Wealth Tax---Charge of tax---Individual---Association of persons not liable to wealth tax as individual under S. 3--- Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, S.3. The expression “Individual” cannot Read More... |
2001 PTD 1328 |
|
Andhra Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
STEEL EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION VS RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 15, 17, 17(2), 192 | Salary |
Salary---Perquisite—House rent---Accommodation provided by employer—Perquisite only if rent charged by employer is concessional---Employer constructing houses in a particular location and rent charged rationalized---No concessional rent when all Read More... |
2001 PTD 1691 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE. LAHORE VS TAUHEED ELAHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 136, 34, 26 | Casual gain |
Hyderogenated Vegetable Oil Industry Act (Control and Development) Act (LXV of 1973), S. 26---Reference to High Court---Scope—Assessee, an individual had shares in a limited company running the business of oil which was taken over Read More... |
2001 PTD 1329 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS INDIA CEMENTS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 154, 348,349 | Business Expenditure |
Business expenditure----Expenditure incurred in violation of another statue is no deductible---- amount paid to managing agent by company in excess of ceiling allowed under S.248 read with S.349 of Companies Act----Amount paid in excess was not deductible---Indian Read More... |
2001 PTD 1698 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS N. NAZEERUDEEN |
Lottery Prize |
Wealth-tax---Net Wealth Lottery prize Dispute regarding ownership of Lottery Prize pending before High Court Assessee allowed to draw one-half of amount by giving Bank guarantee pending litigation on condition that amount to be refunded Read More... |
2001 PTD 1331 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-A, LAHORE VS ABU BAKAR MAQSOOD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d), 136 | Purchase of property |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) ---Ss. 136 & 13(1)(d) Reference to High Court Scope Purchase of property by assessee Estimation of value by the Revenue Authorities cancelled by the Tribunal Reasons which favoured with the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1333 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS UNITED PROVINCES ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32, 32(1)(iii), Expln. (2), (IA), Expln., 41, 41(2) |
Business Income Profits chargeable to tax Balancing charge When moneys payable “become due” Acquisition of electricity undertakings Compensation determined and paid by Government Moneys have become due Profits chargeable in Read More...
|
2001 PTD 1335 |
||
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD VS ABDUL JABBAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched | Individual member of an A.O.P |
Reference to the High Court Scope Individual member of an A.O.P. had disclosed the source of income which was claimed to be exempted Assessing Officer on the basis of the fact that the source had been allowed only part of the income Read More... |
2001 PTD 1348 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE VS MESSRS PUNJAB FLOUR MILLING CORPORATION LTD., LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 10(29) | Levy |
Surcharge, Levy of Retained income Taxes payable could be treated as retained income for the purpose of levy of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1409 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD VS ABDUL JABBAR |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 111, 136 13(1)(aa) & Second Sched | Penalty |
Concealment of income Penalty Claims as share of exempt income was made by the assessee which was finally accepted in appeal penalty for concealment Validity to prefer a claim for exemption of certain amount which was partially Read More... |
2001 PTD 1348 |
|
Delhi High Court (India) | 2001 |
DALMIA DAIRY INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY DALMIA CEMENT LTD) VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37 | Business Expenditure |
Capital or revenue expenditure---Sale of factories in Pakistan---Sale consideration to be satisfied by export of cement----Cement not supplied---Litigation expenses for realising value of cement and interest thereon---Not deductible as business Read More... |
2001 PTD 1706 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 18(1)(a), 15, 14(1), 17(1) | Penalty |
Wealth Tax: Penalty Failure to file returns in time HUF Finding in income tax assessment proceedings that a certain amount did not belong to HUG finding upheld by High Court penalty could not e levied for failure to file wealth tax Read More...
|
2001 PTD 1351 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS LAKSHMI MACHINE WORKS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 37, 37(2A) | Business Expenditure |
(a)Income-tax--- |
2001 PTD 1712 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAWALPINDI ZONE; RAWALPINDI VS MESSRS HEAVY MECHANICAL COMPLEX LTD. TAXILA, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 43 | Plant |
Depreciation “Plant” Connotation Word “plant” had much wider meaning when used in the context of factory “Plant” in its factual meaning included not only the main structure but also the ancillary ones Read More... |
2001 PTD 1354 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
SAKINABAI IBRAHIM & SONS VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 147, 148 | Reassessment |
Income-tax--- Income-tax--- |
2001 PTD 1717 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS M.P. NARAYANAN AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271(1)(c), 68, 273A | Penalty |
(a) Income Tax |
2001 PTD 1356 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
Smt. SHASHI DEVI VS INCOMETAX OFFICER AND OTHERS |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 131, 131(1)(d) | Disclosure of Income |
Voluntary disclosure of income---Income-tax inquiry---Effect of voluntary disclosure of income---Voluntary disclosure does not preclude enquiry by department----Finding that amount disclosed as amount spent on construction of house property was not correct---Issue Read More... |
2001 PTD 1725 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
IQBAL POULTRY FARM, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FAISALABAD |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 65, 136, 166 | Reassessment |
Reassessment Reference to High Court Scope High Court while expressing an opinion had to confine itself Read More... |
2001 PTD 1366 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS SURESH CHANDRA MITTAL |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 271, 271(1), 271(1)(c) | Concealment of income |
Penalty / Concealment of income / Burden of proof / Initial burden on Revenue to prove concealment / Revised returns showing higher income / Returns accepted and assessment completed / Additional income offered to buy peace and avoid litigation / Explanation found Read More... |
2001 PTD 1736 (2000)82 TAX 234 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
Before M. C. Agarwal and S. Rafat Alam, JJ VS ASHOK KUMAR GOEL |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 25(2), 2(m)(ii), 35 | Proceedings |
Revision Commissioner Notices under S. 25 by Commissioner in proceedings to revise assessment Mistake rectified by W.T.O himself under S. 35 of the Act prior to issue of S. 25 notice Rectification order later set aside A.A.C. on Read More... |
2001 PTD 1383 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS PULLICAR MILLS LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 | Gratuity |
Business expenditure / Gratuity / Incremental liability / Amount allowed by A.O. / Tribunal increasing deduction / No material no record to justify such increase / Amount increased not deductible / Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. Held, that the Tribunal had Read More... |
2001 PTD 1739 [(2000)82 TAX 358] |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
MESSRS CRESCENT ART FABRICS (PVT.) LTD., LAHROE VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES, LAHORE |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 13, 13(1)(d) | Deemed income Addition |
Deemed-income-Addition-Directors of assessee company had transferred the land to the company at cost and evident intention appeared to be the allotment of shares of its value to them assessee company had not yet started any business Read More...
|
2001 PTD 1386 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS BEST SUPPLY AGENCY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 256 & 271 | Concealment of income |
Penalty / Concealment of income / Finding by Tribunal that there had been mistakes and that when mistakes were discovered the assessee had agreed to additions to its income / Finding of fact / Tribunal was correct in holding that there had been no concealment of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1741 [(2000)82 TAX 296] |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
TRILOK CHAND SETH VS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 120, 263 | Deemed income Addition |
Revision-Commissioner-Scope of powers Effect of amendment of Explanation of S. 25 by Finance Act, 1988, with retrospective effect Valuation of business assets not dealt with by Appellate Authority no merger of order of Assessing Officer Read More... |
2001 PTD 1390 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS 21ST SOCIETY OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 11 & 13 | Charitable trust |
Charitable trust / Exemption / Nuns receiving salary as teachers in a school / Nuns making over all their earnings to society / Society incurring expenditure required for maintenance of Nuns / Salary minus their maintenance expenses was donation to society / Nuns Read More... |
2001 PTD 1744 [(2000)82 TAX 251] |
|
Kerala High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS P. GOPINATHA PILLA |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(3), 16A | Valuation of Assets |
Valuation of assets Reference to Valuation Officer Assessment year 1982-83 Accounting year ending 30-09-1981 Valuation report of Valuation Officer relating to position as on 30-09-1982 Valuation report not relevant for period ending on Read More... |
2001 PTD 1398 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS N. GOPALSAMY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 16(i) | Standard deduction |
Salary / Standard deduction / Salary income from two employers during accounting year / Two standard deduction are not permissible / Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.16(i). The assessee gave up his job and joined another concern and hence during accounting Read More... |
2001 PTD 1747 |
|
Calcutta High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX VS P. P. GHOSH (through executrix Smt. Jayanti Ghosh) |
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 27(1), 25 | Marketing |
Revision Meaning of “record” Valuation of immovable properties Valuation report of valuation Officer not available to W.T.O. at time of completion of assessment Report can be considered by CWT Revision under S. 25 justified Read More... |
2001 PTD 1404 |
|
Madhya Pradesh High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS S.R. RATHI |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 260A | Existence of substantial question of law |
Appeal to High Court / Competency of appeal / Existence of substantial question of law / Exemption / Gratuity / Leave encashment / Tribunal finding that assessee was fifty-eight year of age and was entitled to exemption under Ss. 10(10A) and 10(10AA) / Read More... |
2001 PTD 1749 [241 I T R 190] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX VS GUJARAT STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LTD |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 10(29) | Marketing |
Exemption Income of authority constituted for marketing of commodities, from letting out godowns or warehouses Interest income and other income of such authority, whether entitled to exemption Conflict of opinion in decisions of Supreme Court Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VS S. MUTHYAM REDDY |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.2 | Agricultural income/ Capital gains |
Capital gains / Agricultural income / Profits from sale of agricultural lands / Law applicable / Effect of insertion of Expln to S. 2(1A) with retrospective effect from 1-411970 / income arising from transfer of lands referred to in S.2(14)(iii)(a) or (b) cannot be Read More... |
2001 PTD 1752 [(2000)82 TAX 37] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS BHOORATNAM & CO |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 32A, 154, 256 | Levy |
Reference---Rectification of mistakes--- In proceedings under S.154 whether Assessing Officer can verify which machinery was used for contract work Question of law Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss. 154 & 256 [CIT v. Bhooratnam & Read More... |
2001 PTD 1410 |
|
Madras High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS KAMADHENU |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.40(b) | Business expenditure/ Net interest paid by firm to partner to be considered for disallowance |
Firm/ Business expenditure/ Disallowance/ Net interest paid by firm to partner to be considered for disallowance/ India Income Tax Act, 1961, S.40(b). The assesse was firm carrying on textile business. A sum of Rs.11,859 was the interest payment made by the Read More... |
2001 PTD 1759 [(2000)82 TAX 101] [241 ITR 17] |
|
Supreme Court of India | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. NIZAMS MISCELLANEOUS TRUST |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 19, 16(i), 57(i), 256 | Income Trust |
Reference Income Trust Assessment of trust Income from other sources Deductions Trust deed providing for remuneration to trustees Decision of High Court for assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 that amount paid to trustees was diverted Read More... |
2001 PTD 1412 |
|
Allahabad High Court (India) | 2001 |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS BANARAS BRASS MERCHANT AND MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 S.11 | Charitable purpose/ Trust for formation of trade and commerce |
Charitable purpose/ Charitable trust/ Trust for formation of trade and commerce/ Finding by Tribunal that objects of trusts were for general public utility and that there was no activity for profit/ Trust entitled to exemption under S.11/ Indian Income Tax Act, Read More... |
2001 PTD 1762 [(2000)82 TAX 120] |