Court | Year | Petitioner | Law/Section | Topic | Case Law | Citation/Ref. | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS NOOR UL HAQ THROUGH ABDUL SAMAD VS THE GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BALOCHISTAN AN 2 OTHERS |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015 14,14(1),14(3),53 | Interpretation of statutes |
Interpretation of statutes----Retrospective effect---Scope---Statute, which is procedural in nature, can operate retrospectively unless it affects an existing right on the date of promulgation or causes injustice or prejudice to a substantive right---If such statute Read More... |
2024 PTD 342 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZE OFFICER AND OTHERS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006 S.36 | Notice for Aduit of refunds laid |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006---R. 36---SRO 555(I)/2006, dated 05.06.2006---Post-sanction audit of refund claims---Notice, issuance of---Scope---Deputy Commissioner or Commissioner Inland Revenue, Powers of---Scope---Petitioners (companies/registered taxpayers) invoked Read More... |
2024 PTD 370 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS YUNUS TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZE OFFICER AND OTHERS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006 S.36---SRO 555(I)/2006, dated 05.06.2006 | Refunds |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006---R. 36---SRO 555(I)/2006, dated 05.06.2006---Post-sanction audit of refund claims---Notice, issuance of---Scope---Deputy Commissioner or Commissioner Inland Revenue, Powers of---Scope---Petitioners (companies/registered taxpayers) invoked Read More... |
2024 PTD 370 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2024 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, RTO, FAISALABAD VS MESSRS CHAWLA ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 3,6,7,8,10,11(3),22,23,26,47,47(5),73 Sales Tax Rules, 2006 Ss. 36,38 | Findings of fact |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---S.47---Reference to High Court---Factual controversy---Scope---Findings of fact given by Appellate Tribunal are not open to further examination by the High Court---High Court cannot entertain any question on a finding of Read More... |
2024 PTD 368 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS YAKIN CO. THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S. 11,11(5) | Show-Cause Notice |
S. 11---Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Order-in-Original, absence of---Fresh/Second Show-Cause Notice, issuance of---Legality---Commissioner Inland Revenue, powers of----Scope---Plea of the Inland Revenue Read More... |
2024 PTD 355 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
GETZ PHARMA (PVT.) LIMITED AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Sixth Schedule, Entry No.105---Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Sched. & Fifth Sched. | Packing material |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----Sixth Schedule, Entry No.105---Customs Act (IV of 1969), First Sched. & Fifth Sched.---Exemption from duty---Packing material---Provisions of two laws---Appellant company claimed that packaging material was entitled to exemption Read More... |
2024 PTD 290 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
MESSRS CRESCENT FIBRES LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTO, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 3,11 | Delay in furnishing |
Ss. 3 & 11---Delay in furnishing Sales tax payments---Penalty under S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, imposition/recovery of--- Scope---Department imposed penalty on the registered person for not depositing sales tax for a period of one and half Read More... |
2024 PTD 277 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
MESSRS CRESCENT FIBRES LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTO, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 3,11 | Mens rea of taxpayer |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-----Ss. 3 &11---Late payment of sales tax---Penalty, imposition/recovery of---Scope---Mens rea of taxpayer, absence of---Willful default--- Department imposed penalty on the registered person for not depositing sales tax for a period Read More... |
2024 PTD 277 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2024 |
MESSRS CRESCENT FIBRES LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LTO, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 3,11 | Willful default |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Ss.3 & 11---Delay in furnishing Sales tax payments---Willful default---Penalty, quantum of---Scope---Department imposed penalty on the registered person for not depositing sales tax for a period of one and half Read More... |
2024 PTD 277 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2024 |
COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD VS CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 73 | Adjustment of input tax |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---S. 73--Adjustment of input tax--Requirement of S. 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, non-compliance of--Question was, whether or not, non-compliance, of requirement of S. 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 (‘the Act, 1990’) would be Read More... |
2024 PTD 275 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
NAWAB BROTHERS STEEL MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S.7,7A,8,8B,10 Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules 2007, R.SH | Exemption |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----Ss.7, 7A, 8, 8B & 10---Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules 2007, R.SH---Sale tax, collection of---Import of machinery---Petitioners were manufacturers of steel products and were aggrieved by imposition and collection of sales tax at Read More... |
2024 PTD 256 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
NAWAB BROTHERS STEEL MILLS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S.11 | Order passed beyond Show-Cause Notice |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----S. 11---Assessment Order passed beyond Show-Cause Notice--- Effect---Record revealed that taxpayer was not confronted with any invoice or allegation---Show-Cause Notice, was totally silent and had not mentioned any allegation which had Read More... |
2024 PTD 256 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Sindh and another VS MULTILINE ENTERPRISES |
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 S.. 64A | Suit for recovery of advance income tax |
Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930)-------S. 64A---Provincial Government tender for supply of imported tractors---Suit for recovery of advance income tax and sales tax paid by the supplier on import of tractors---Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the claim of Read More... |
2024 PTD 235 2024 PLD 81 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2024 |
Messrs SPRINT OIL AND GAS SERVICES PAKISTAN FZC, ISLAMABAD---Petitioner VS OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED (OGDCL), ISLAMABAD |
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 S.199 | Constitutional jurisdiction |
Constitution of Pakistan----Art. 199---Provincial laws on sales tax on services---Constitutional jurisdiction of (Islamabad) High Court---Scope---Constitutional petition filed before the Islamabad High Court---Maintainability---Petitioner-company had carried out Read More... |
2024 PTD 221 129 TAX 171 2024 SCMR 117 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
Messrs RECKITT AND COLMAN PAKISTAN LIMITED VS The COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE OF SALES TAX (WEST) and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act, (III of 1951) 36,47 | Sales tax, recovery Tax exemption |
Ss. 36 & 47---Notifications SRO 598(I)/90 dated 7-6-1990 & SRO 553(I)/94 dated 9-6-1994---Sales tax, recovery of---Tax exemption---Show-cause notice---Limitation---Dispute of exemption from payment of sales tax was with regard to product namely Read More... |
2024 PTD 176 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2024 |
Messrs DALDA FOODS LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.25 Federal Excise Act, 2005 Ss.46 | selected for audit |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---S. 25---Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), S. 46---Audit, selection for---Commissioner, powers of---Scope---Plaintiff/taxpayer/company challenged notice issued by the Commissioner Inland Revenue under S.46 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 Read More... |
2024 PTD 156 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD. FAISALABAD
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(37), 3, 4, 11, 11(3), 26(1), 33, 73 | Zero-rating | benefit of zero-rating |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Zero-rating---Scope---Appellant showed zero- rated supplies of goods to various registered persons---Cross-matching of the sales tax returns of Read More... |
2023 PTD 552 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE WITHHOLDING, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR VS MESSRS CHASHMA SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD., D.I. KHAN |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal statute |
Necessary ingredients—Fiscal statute normally contains two provisions; charging provisions which impose charge to tax and machinery provisions which provide machinery for quantification of tax and the levy and collection of tax so imposed— Charging Read More... |
2023 PTD 1709 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE WITHHOLDING, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR VS MESSRS CHASHMA SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD., D.I. KHAN |
Interpretation of statutes | Retrospective applicability |
Language—Retrospective applicability—Principle—In a taxing statute, as in other statutes, there should be no departure from general rule that words used in a statute must first be given their ordinary and natural meaning—It is only when such Read More... |
2023 PTD 1709 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SYED ATIF SALMAN HASHMI AND ANOTHER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 3(1A), 24 | bogus tax returns/ quashed FIR |
Quashing of criminal proceedings without petitioner approaching Trial Court---Recovery of bogus tax returns Initiation of proceedings---Limitation---Petitioner was accused of committing fraud in receiving bogus tax returns---Petitioner Read More... |
2023 PTD 666 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE WITHHOLDING, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR VS MESSRS CHASHMA SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD., D.I. KHAN |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 3, 11 [as amended by Finance Act 2016] & 47 | Retrospective effect of Circular |
Withholding of tax—Retrospective effect—Applicability—Authorities issued show cause notice to respondent company for certain discrepancies with regard to withholding of short/less amount of sales tax as withholding agent while making purchases etc. Read More... |
2023 PTD 1709 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SYED ATIF SALMAN HASHMI AND ANOTHER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS |
Criminal Procedure Code 1898 S.249-A, 365-K & 561-A Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | FIR/Trial/ miscarriage of justice |
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199- Constitutional petition-- Quashing of proceedings---Inherent jurisdiction of High Court-Scope---When a criminal matter is pending before a Trial Court and interim challan has been submitted, under Read More... |
2023 PTD 666 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL ZONE, LTO, MULTAN
VS MESSRS USMAN TRADER LINKERS, MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(17), 47 | Interpretation of statutes / Fiscal statutes |
Words or and --Scope--In legislative instruments/provisions word or is employed in disjunctive sense (means it separates things) and word "and" in conjunctive sense (means it combines things)---In certain cases, words and and Read More... |
2023 PTD 679 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL ZONE, LTO, MULTAN
VS MESSRS USMAN TRADER LINKERS, MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(17), 47 | Interpretation of statutes / Fiscal statutes |
Word "or"--Scope-Word "or" appearing in which means that words owns and has his own manufacturing facility vise to S.2(17) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, is used in disjunctive sense, have been used to convey different Read More... |
2023 PTD 679 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL ZONE, LTO, MULTAN
VS MESSRS USMAN TRADER LINKERS, MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.2(17) & 47 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, Rr.7(4) & 29(1)(b) | Manufacturer-cum-exporter / Commercial Exporter |
Reference-Commercial Exporter-Expeditious Refund System-- Particulars of registration, change of---Commissioner Inland Revenue---Suo motu powers---Respondent entity was registered as "Manufacturer-cum-exporter" for the purposes of tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 679 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL DIVISION, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, LAHORE
VS MESSRS RAFAQAT MARKETING, LAHORE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 21(3), 47 & 73 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 12 (5) | Refund claims-Scrutiny |
Reference--- Refund claims-Scrutiny-Factual controversy---Dispute was with regard to invoices issued by suppliers who had either been declared blacklisted or were non-existent with "registration suspended" status--- Show-Cause Notices Read More... |
2023 PTD 720 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 4 | Preamble |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Preamble---Laws which impose tax on sales---Interpretation---Such laws, being tax laws, are subject to a strict construction in accordance with the tax statutes generally---In other words, a sales tax statute must be strictly construed Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 4, Second Proviso & 8(1)(b)---Notification S.R.O. 491(I)/2016 dated 30.06.2016---Notification S.R.O. 1125(I)/2011 dated 31.12.2011 | Packing material |
Condition (x), first proviso ("the impugned proviso") [as substituted vide Notification S.R.O. 491(I)/2016 dated 30.06.2016]---Notification S.R.O. 777(I)/2018 dated 21.06.2018---Input tax adjustment---Disallowance of input tax on packing material---Withdrawal of a Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Doctrine of ultra vires |
Ultra vires, doctrine of-----Scope---Doctrine of ultra vires envisages that an authority can exercise only so much power as is conferred on it by law---Any action of the authority is intra vires when it falls within the limits of the power conferred on it but ultra Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Proviso to a section |
Interpretation of statutes-----'Proviso' to a section---Scope---Normal function of a proviso is to except something out of the enactment or to qualify something enacted therein---If the enacting portion of a section is not clear a proviso appended to it may give an Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Curative and remedial legislation |
Interpretation of statutes--Curative and remedial legislation---Purpose and scope-- Retroactive/retrospective application---Curative statute is meant for lawmakers to recuperate the prior enactment for rectifying the defect or omission---In order to find out whether Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS DEWAN SALMAN FIBER LTD. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S. 13(1). Protection of Economic Reforms Act 1992, Ss. 3 & 6. SRO 580(I)/91 dated 27.06.1991. (‘SRO 580/91’). SRO 561(I)/94 dated 09.06.1994. (‘SRO 561/94’). SRO 612(I)/94 dated 14.06.199 | Exemption FATA / PATA |
Manufacturer of polyester staple fiber (PSF) in North-West Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)—Exemption from sales tax, removal of—Sales tax imposed on raw materials i.e. mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and pure terephthalic acid Read More... |
2023 PTD 1635 (2023) 128 TAX 435 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
MESSRS RAJBY INDUSTRIES KARACHI AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 13(1)—Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992), S.6— SRO 462(I)/88 dated 26.06.1988 (‘SRO 462/88’)—SRO 482(I)/92 dated 14.05.1992 (‘SRO 482/92’)—SRO 529(I)/88 dated 26.06.1988 (SROs 529/88)—SRO 580(I)/91 dated 27.06.1991 (SRO 580/91)— | Exemption from sales tax |
Manufacturer of polyester staple fiber (PSF) in North-West Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)—Exemption from sales tax, removal of—Sales tax imposed on raw materials i.e. mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and pure terephthalic acid Read More... |
2023 PTD 1244 (2023) 128 TAX 74 2023 PTCL 818 2023 SCMR 1407 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ABBOTTABAD AND ANOTHER
VS MESSRS SAIM TRADERS AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.3, 47 Fifth Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 247 | Exemption from duty and taxes |
Exemption from duty and taxes... Applicability--Dispute was with regard to exemption granted to respondent tax-payer on the plea that goods were supplied by Norwegian Refugee Council to internally displaced persons---Any person could be Read More... |
2023 PTD 763 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS DEWAN SALMAN FIBER LTD. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 3(1) & 3(2). Protection of Economic Reforms Act 1992, S. 6. SRO 515(l)/95 dated 14.06.1995. (‘SRO 515/95’). | Exemption from sales tax |
Manufacturer of polyester staple fiber (PSF) in North-West Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)—Exemption from sales tax, removal of—Sales tax imposed on raw materials i.e. mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and pure terephthalic acid Read More... |
2023 PTD 1635 (2023) 128 TAX 435 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD VS MESSRS AHMAD STRAW BOARD PRIVATE LIMITED, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 11, 36 & 47 | Wrong provision of law/ Effect |
Wrong provision of law—Effect— Show-cause notice was set aside by Customs Appellate Tribunal for mentioning of S.U(3) instead of S.36 of Sales Tax Act, 1990— Validity—Merely because show-cause notices were labelled under S.ll(3) instead of Read More... |
2023 PTD 1528 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
DIGRI SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(25), 3(1A), 11, 33 | Further tax/ S. 3(1A) unequivocally imposed the obligation of further |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Further tax--- Registered person-Scope---Show-cause notice was issued to the applicant alleging supplies made to unregistered persons and Read More... |
2023 PTD 825 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
DIGRI SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
VS THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(25), 3(1A), 11, 33 | Administration of justice/Courts |
Courts ought to abstain from deciding larger question, if a case could be decided on narrower grounds----It is preferred for the courts to confine determination to question pivotal for the determination of a case. Read More... |
2023 PTD 825 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-IV, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI VS MESSRS AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD., A-39. MANGHOPIR ROAD. SITE, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Art (VII of 1990) Ss. 25 & 8(1)(c)(a). Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A | Fake/ Flying invoices |
Allegation of issuing fake/flying invoices and claiming input tax against such invoices—Liability raised against tax payer based on presumptions—No attempt made by the Department to verify the invoices—In the present case the show cause notice was Read More... |
2023 PTD 1492 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-IV, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI VS MESSRS AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD., A-39. MANGHOPIR ROAD. SITE, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Art 1990 Ss. 25 & 8(1)(c)(a). Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A | Show Cause Notice |
Before the issuance of the show cause notice no meaningful effort was made by the sales tax officials to conduct an audit nor was a proper inquiry made by exercising powers conferred under the Sales Tax Act, 1990 (‘Act of 1990’) in order to verify the Read More... |
2023 PTD 1492 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-IV, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI VS MESSRS AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD., A-39. MANGHOPIR ROAD. SITE, KARACHI |
Interpretation of statutes . | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute—While interpreting fiscal statutes, the court looks to what is clearly said and there is no room for any intendment nor is there any equity about a tax—There is no presumption as to tax and nothing was to be read in or implied and one Read More... |
2023 PTD 1492 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-IV, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI VS Messrs AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD., A-39. MANGHOPIR ROAD. SITE, KARACHI |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 10A | Right to fair trial |
Right to fair trial—Reverse onus on Read More... |
2023 PTD 1492 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
VS DEWAN SALMAN FIBER LTD. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 13(1). Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992), S.6. SRO 462(I)/88 dated 26.06.1988. (‘SRO 462/88’). SRO 482(I)/92 dated 14.05.1992. (‘SRO 482/92’). SRO 529(I)/88 dated 26.06.1988. (SROs 529/88). SRO 580(I)/91 dated 27.06.1991. (SRO 580/91) | Exemption from sales tax |
Manufacturer of polyester staple fiber (PSF) in North-West Frontier Province (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)—Exemption from sales tax, removal of—Sales tax imposed on raw materials i.e. mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and pure terephthalic acid Read More... |
2023 PTD 1635 (2023) 128 TAX 435 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL ZONE, LARGE TAXPAYERS OFFICE, LAHORE VS MESSRS SAPPHIRE DAIRIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(39), 2(41), 2(48), 3, 13, 47 | taxable supplies |
Exempted goods----Import and supplies-----Scope----Authorities contended that benefit of notification SRO No.549(I)/2008, dated Read More... |
2023 PTD 44 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SAIF-UL-MULK VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 33(11)(c), 33(13) | Bail/Requirement of cash surety |
Accused was granted bail with the consent of Special Prosecutor (Customs) subject to the deposit of 25% of the alleged evaded Read More... |
2023 PTD 143 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
SAIF-UL-MULK VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 33(11)(c), 33(13) | Bail/ Deposit instead of recognizance |
Deposit instead of recognizance ----Scope-----Criminal court, at the time of granting bail, cannot Read More... |
2023 PTD 143 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS NEW ALLIED ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 11, 11(3), 11(4), 32, 33(5), 34, 47 | Refunded. erroneously. |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied erroneously Read More... |
2023 PTD 264 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI VS MESSRS ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 7(1), 66 | Input tax, adjustment / beneficial provision |
Input tax, adjustment of-Scope and nature-Section 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 by nature is a beneficial provision of law Read More... |
2023 PTD 320 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI VS MESSRS ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 7(1), 66 | time limit/input tax |
Whether any time limit for adjustment of input tax---Held, that section 7(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 does not stipulate any Read More... |
2023 PTD 320 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
THE COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI VS MESSRS ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 7(1), 66 | time limit/input tax |
Import of new machinery and spare parts--Input tax, refund/adjustment of-Time and manner of claiming the adjustment of input Read More... |
2023 PTD 320 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2023 |
THE CIR, RTO, PESHAWAR.
VS M/S. PESHAWAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY (PESCO), PESHAWAR. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 10, 10(3), 11, 36, 50A, 50B | Refund claims/ processing |
Refund of input tax---Scrutiny and processing refund claim---Scope---Registered person claimed refund of amounts of input tax Read More... |
2023 PTD 332 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD.
VS M/S. ENGINEERS ASSOCIATED PRECAST (PVT.) LTD. |
Law: Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 11(3), 47, 47(1), 47(5) | Limitation | Condonation of delay |
Limitation... Condonation of delay, non-availing of---Authorities assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue without filing application for condonation of delay-----Reference application was barred by time for 03 months and 03 days---Office raised Read More... |
2023 PTD 393 2022 PTCL 569 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MCC (E&C) CUSTOMS HOUSE, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER VS ZAIN UL ABIDIN AND OTHERS |
Limitation 0 | Condonation of delay |
Condonation of delay---Scope---If decisions are assailed they should be done within the prescribed period, and it should not be assumed that delay would be condoned when there is no valid reason to condone the Read More... |
2023 PTD 487 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2023 |
MESSRS NAFEES PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, BARA VS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, PESHAWAR AND 9 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Sixth Schedule, 151 2(2) | concession provided by FBR |
Port of clearance/-Determination/Petitioner company was aggrieved of denial of authorities to clear goods imported by petitioner at Karachi Port/Plea raised by petitioner company was that total import for financial year was less than Read More... |
2023 PTD 488 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2023 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, SIALKOT VS Messrs GENERAL FAN COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., GUJRAT |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46 & 40B | right of appeal |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal /Scope/Department sought vacation of stay granted by the Tribunal wherein the operation of order passed by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) under S.40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, was suspended till the Read More... |
2023 PTD 513 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS MUGHAL BOARD INDUSTRY |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 34A | Amnesty notification | default surcharge |
Illegally adjusted input tax---Default surcharge and penalties---Amnesty Scheme---Purpose of an amnesty scheme is to incentivize payment and collection of stuck-up revenue---Taxpayer who had made voluntary payment before the cut-off date under the amnesty scheme can Read More... |
2022 PTD 434 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Judgment |
Judgment is an authority only in respect to what it decides, and only with regard to the proposition of law raised, in that case, and therefore point not argued before the Court cannot be considered to have been dealt with by its Read More... |
2022 PTD 683 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) | Jurisdiction |
Power vested in any authority can only be exercised by that authority, in default whereof, the entire action would be without jurisdiction, void ab initio and of no legal effect. Question of jurisdiction in forum is considered to be very important and Read More... |
2022 PTD 783 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS GRAVITY TRADING CO. HYDERABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, RTO, HYDERABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 21(2) | Term “Satisfied†and ‘committed tax fraud’ |
When term satisfaction is used for the purpose of judicial determination, it is necessary that nothing more nor less it should be bona fide and not actuated by malice, a fact and not a pretext and the same can be determined from all fact and circumstance of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 799 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS GRAVITY TRADING CO. HYDERABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, RTO, HYDERABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 21(2) | Deregistration | Blacklisting |
Change of address---Tax payer was aggrieved of order passed by tax authorities under S. 21(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, whereby taxpayer was blacklisted-----Validity----Taxpayer sought through a letter restoration of its registration and had also informed to tax Read More... |
2022 PTD 799 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
QUALITY STEEL RE-ROLLING MILL, THROUGH LEGALLY AUTHORIZED OFFICER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 7 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 74-A, | SRO No.583(I)/2017 (Jurisdiction) |
[as inserted by Finance Act, 2017]---SRO No.583(I)/2017 dated 1-7-2017---Vires of notification---Variation in incidence of taxation---Federal Read More... |
2022 PTD 39 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
M/S NEW MOHMAND STEEL MILLS THROUGH ATTORNEY VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Federal Excise Act, 2005 First Schedule, Table 1, entry No. 58 | Reading Down |
Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Amendment, vires of---Doctrine of “Reading Down”--- Applicability---Petitioners were Read More... |
2022 PTD 254 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2022 |
M/S NEW MOHMAND STEEL MILLS THROUGH ATTORNEY VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH FEDERAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 6 OTHERS |
Federal Excise Act, 2005 First Schedule, Table 1, entry No. 58 | Exemption of Duties |
Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Amendment, vires of---Doctrine of “Reading Down”--- Applicability---Petitioners were running their industrial units in erstwhile federally Administered Tribal Area Read More... |
2022 PTD 254 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
AMSONS TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED ATTORNEY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN AND 5 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 4(d), 11-A, 33(5), 34(1), 45-B | Zero Rating |
Notification SRO 509(I)/2009 dated 09-07-2007 and SRO 1125 (I)/ 2011 dated 31-12-2011---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.11---Suit for Read More... |
2022 PTD 212 |
|
Appellate Tribunal-Inland Revenue | 2022 |
M/S MUKHTAR-UL-HAQ POWER LOOMS, TOBA TEK SINGH VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(5AB), 2(25), 2(14), 2(37), 3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 22, 23, 26, 33(13), 46 | Sales Tax Liability |
Documents relating to the income tax could not be made the basis for creating sales tax liability against any registered person without any Read More... |
2022 PTD 207 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
LOUIS DREYFUS COMPANY PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 8, 77 | Adjustment / Refund |
Sales Tax General Order No. 105/2019 dated 13.12.2019---Sales Tax Liability---Adjustment/refund of sales tax paid under special procedures---Scope---Petitioner, an importer of palm oil, sought input tax adjustment for Read More... |
2022 PTD 205 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS SHAHPOSH GARMENTS, GUJRANWALA VS THE CIR ZONE-II, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 13 | Double jeopardy / Protection against double punishment |
Protection against double punishment and self-incrimination. Scope issuance of a notice regarding the same taxed amounts tantamount to double jeopardy which cannot be given legal credence but also offends and defies the fundamental rights set out in Art. 13 of the Read More... |
2022 PTD 187 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, PESHAWAR VS MESSRS PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY (LTD.), ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S. 2(33), 2(39), 2(41), 3(1A) & 3(3) Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), Ss. 4& 19 | Defect in show cause notice |
Smuggling seizure of things liable to confiscation extent of confiscation scope dumper truck was intercepted, post a chase on the highway, and inside a concealed specially designed tank was discovered loaded with ostensibly smuggled Read More... |
2022 PTD 1147 126 TAX 342 2022 PTCL 698 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S NISHAT CHUNIAN POWER LIMITED |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 8(2) & 47 Sales Tax Rules, 2006 Rr. 13(3) & 24 | Defect in show cause notice |
Input tax, apportionment Question was with regard to adjustment of input tax on payments made against Capacity Purchase Price Validity Amount received on account of Capacity Purchase Price was not part of supply under R. 13(3) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 dealt with a Read More... |
2022 PTD 1180 (2022)125 TAX 377 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(12), 2(35), 2(41), 3, 3(1), 3(1)(a), 6, 11, 22, 23, 26, 47 | Liability of purchaser of goods |
Taxpayer was imposed upon a liability to pay sales tax on account of acquisition of taxable goods for construction of immovable property----Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the imposition of tax---Appellate Tribunal party allowed the appeal filed by Read More... |
2022 PTD 1209 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
M/S MUKHTAR-UL-HAQ POWER LOOMS, TOBA TEK SINGH VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(5AB), 2(25), 2(14), 2(37), 3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 22, 23, 26, 33(13), 46 | Income tax record |
Income tax record could be looked into for the purposes of conducting investigations and if any difference was detected by the detecting agency then it should be substantiated with solid and convincing material evidences as records relating to income tax could not Read More... |
2022 PTD 207 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS FILTERS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 11(2), 11(5), 47, 74 | Time Extension | Proceeding pending |
Question before High Court was whether after expiry of timeframe prescribed by S.11(5) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 for issuance of show- cause notice, could the same be extended or resurrected in a time- barred cause under SRO No.394(1)/2001 dated 20.05.2009 read with Read More... |
2022 PTD 345 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2022 |
KAMRAN TEXTILE (PVT.) LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 25(2), 72B, 72b(2) | Audit |
The procedure prescribed under S.25 of the Act Shall be adopted for conducting audit, and said S.72B(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, procedure prescribed under S.25 of the Act shall be adopted for conducting audit, and said S.72B(2) could not be construed in a manner to Read More... |
2022 PTD 424 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS MUGHAL BOARD INDUSTRY |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 34A | Amnesty notification | default surcharge |
Illegally adjusted input tax---Default surcharge and penalties---Amnesty Scheme---Purpose of an amnesty scheme is to incentivize payment and collection of stuck-up revenue---Taxpayer who had made voluntary payment before the cut-off date under the amnesty scheme can Read More... |
2022 PTD 434 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I VS MESSRS FAIZAN STEEL |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 3(1)(A), 47, 71 | Special procedure regime |
Since such taxpayer was being dealt with through a special regime, therefore the general treatment may not be applied for recovery of additional sales tax in terms of S.3(1)(A) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 from such taxpayer-Rule 58H of Sales Tax (Special Procedure) Read More... |
2022 PTD 390 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Judgment |
Judgment is an authority only in respect to what it decides, and only with regard to the proposition of law raised, in that case, and therefore point not argued before the Court cannot be considered to have been dealt with by its Read More... |
2022 PTD 683 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Levy | charge | tax |
---Levy/charge/tax, imposition of---Scope---Tax, levy or charge can only be imposed under a clear mandate and sanction of law. ---Levy of tax---Scope—Measure of a tax must have a reasonable nexus with it, the subject matter, and that a tax cannot Read More... |
2022 PTD 683 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-1, LAHORE. VS M/S. PAK ELEKTRON LTD. ETC. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 4 | Electricity Meters |
Equipment eligible for zero rating of sales tax under SRO No. 530(1)/2005 dated 6-6-2005 (‘the SRO’)----Plea by tax department that electricity meters are consumer durables and are not eligible for classification as equipment and hence not covered by the Read More... |
2022 PTD 747 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD., SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8, 10, 21, 73 | Adjustment |
Legislature had consciously given a right to a buyer in such cases to reclaim input tax so paid, where registration of the supplier was suspended or blacklisted, either as a refund or by way of adjustment---Subsequent blacklisting did not disentitle the buyer from Read More... |
2022 PTD 749 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD., SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8, 10, 21, 73 | Goods indirectly used |
Alleged goods/services were not directly in use for manufacturing or production of taxable goods yet they were indirectly used for the progress, promotion, advancement and enhancement of business activity and there was nothing emphatic in the Sales Tax Act, 1990, Read More... |
2022 PTD 749 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD., SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8, 10, 21, 73 | Determination of tax liability |
Determination of tax liability---Scope---Once a registered person established that the goods/services in question on which input tax had been paid were used or to be used “directly, indirectly or even remotely” for the purpose of ‘taxable Read More... |
2022 PTD 749 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD., SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8, 10, 21, 73 | Tax credit not allowed |
Scope---Keyword used in S.7 and S.8(1)(a) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, is “purpose” which means that input tax can be deducted on goods used for the purpose of taxable supplies---In other words, issue of adjustment of input tax is to be resolved with Read More... |
2022 PTD 749 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS TOWN CRIER (PVT.) LTD., SARGODHA ROAD, FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8, 10, 21, 73 | Direct relationship of input |
No condition of direct relationship of input goods to manufacturing of finished goods is provided in S. 8(1)(a) of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2022 PTD 749 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO) AND 3 OTHERS VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007 58H | Steel melters and reroller |
In the present case the consumers were steel-melters, steel re-rollers and composite units of steel melting and re-rolling (“the consumers”)---As to the sales tax charged by the appellants from these consumers for the supply of electricity, i.e., 17% Read More... |
2022 PTD 765 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Final discharge |
Special procedure for payment of extra sales tax on specified electric home appliances-Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded-Scope-- Appellant was engaged in business of Storage Read More... |
2022 PTD 783 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | De-registration | Blacklisting | Suspension |
Certain transactions not admissible-Scope-Appellant had transacted all payments to his suppliers through Banking channel by complying with the mandatory provisions of S. 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which was the sole obligation of the buyer to ensure veracity of Read More... |
2022 PTD 783 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
MESSRS AYAN TRADING COMPANY, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 21, 33, 34, 46, 73 | Penalties/ Default surcharge |
In case of penalty for late filing of returns, the initial onus of proving of mens rea is on the department---Imposing of penalties in case of committing default in payment of tax or late filing of sales tax returns is not automatic and some determination which Read More... |
2022 PTD 783 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE. VS M/S. SARGODHA SPINNING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. FAISALABAD. ETC. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 46 & 47 | Tribunal/final fact-finding body |
Findings of facts determined by the Tribunal/Appellate Tribunal Interference by the High Court Tax Tribunal is the final fact finding body only “question of law” is to be examined by the (High) Court in a Sales tax Reference. Tribunal is the Read More... |
2022 PTD 1079 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICER (RTO), MAYO ROAD, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER VS MESSRS SARWAQ TRADERS, 216/1-A, ADAMJEE ROAD, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 45-B(2) | Appeal before CIR |
Appeal before Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) Maximum period of 180 days prescribed under section 45-2(B) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for deciding the appeal such prescribed time period was mandatory obligation fixed on the Commissioner (Appeals) by section Read More... |
2022 PTD 1128 126 TAX 153 2022 PTCL 688 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2022 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICER (RTO), MAYO ROAD, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER VS MESSRS SARWAQ TRADERS, 216/1-A, ADAMJEE ROAD, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 45-B(2) | mandatory or directory |
Ultimate test to determine whether a provision is mandatory or directory is that of ascertaining the legislative intent while the use of the word ‘shall’ is not the sole factor which determines mandatory or directory nature of a provision, it is Read More... |
2022 PTD 1128 126 TAX 153 2022 PTCL 688 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
MUHAMMAD ZAHID VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ETC. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.72-B & 25 | Audit/Selection for audit |
Selection of audit of taxpayer under S.72-B of Sales Tax Act, 1990-Records, documents, provision of-Scope---Petitioner/ taxpayer impugned selection for audit under S.72-B of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and subsequent notice to submit record under S.25 of the same, inter Read More... |
2021 PTD 80 2020 LHC 2155 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
MUHAMMAD ZAHID VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ETC. |
Precedent | ratio decidendi |
Distinction between "obiter dicta" and "ratio decidendi"-Scope--Distinction was to be made between what was ratio decidendi of a case and what was mere obiter dicta---What was necessary for decision of the issue in a case was ratio decidendi and was binding however, Read More... |
2021 PTD 80 2020 LHC 2155 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS AL-AMEEN DENIM MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 4, 11 | Zero rating facility/rented textile unit |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded--Scope---Department conducted physical verification of the appellant's declared premises to ascertain the admissibility of zero rating facility on consumption of utilities and Read More... |
2021 PTD 125 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
COLLECTOR SALES TAX VS ARMY WELFARE TRUST-NIZAMPUR CEMENT PLANT AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of statutes | Filing of appeal |
Construction of statutory authority to public officials in a statute---Authority/power to file appeal or reference on behalf of public Department-Scope-Appeal under any statute could only be filed by authority/officer designated or prescribed for such purpose by Read More... |
2021 PTD 130 (2021) 123 TAX 187 2022 PTCL 382 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
COLLECTOR SALES TAX VS ARMY WELFARE TRUST-NIZAMPUR CEMENT PLANT AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 30, 47 | Filing of appeal |
Persons authorized to file Reference under S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 on behalf of Department---Nature of S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Question before High Court was whether reference under S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 as it stood in the year 2007, could be Read More... |
2021 PTD 130 (2021) 123 TAX 187 2022 PTCL 382 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS AL-AMEEN DENIM MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 4, 11 | Zero rating facility/rented textile unit |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded--Scope---Department conducted physical verification of the appellant's declared premises to ascertain the admissibility of zero rating facility on consumption of utilities and Read More... |
2021 PTD 125 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
COLLECTOR SALES TAX VS ARMY WELFARE TRUST-NIZAMPUR CEMENT PLANT AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of statutes | Filing of appeal |
Construction of statutory authority to public officials in a statute---Authority/power to file appeal or reference on behalf of public Department-Scope-Appeal under any statute could only be filed by authority/officer designated or prescribed for such purpose by Read More... |
2021 PTD 130 (2021) 123 TAX 187 2022 PTCL 382 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
COLLECTOR SALES TAX VS ARMY WELFARE TRUST-NIZAMPUR CFiling of appealEMENT PLANT AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47&30 | Filing of appeal |
Persons authorized to file Reference under S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 on behalf of Department---Nature of S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Question before High Court was whether reference under S.47 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 as it stood in the year 2007, could be Read More... |
2021 PTD 130 (2021) 123 TAX 187 2022 PTCL 382 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2021 |
M/S ORIENT PAK INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE
VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, GROUP-VI, MCC, (APPRAISEMENT-EAST). KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 11 Customs Act 1969 Ss.18, 18A, 18C, 32, 198 & 202 Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.162 | Mis-declaration /Income tax and Sales tax, recovery |
Show-cause notice--- Jurisdiction--Valuation Ruling (VR)---Object, purpose and scope--- Importer was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued by Deputy Collector for recovery of taxes including sales tax and income tax, on the plea of Read More... |
2021 PTD 138 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S EJAZ BROTHERS STEEL FURNACE, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.3 & 6- Customs Act 1969 S.32 Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007, Rr.581 & 58MA | Re-meltable iron and steel scrap |
Time and manner of payment of sales tax-Recovery of sales tax non-levied or short-levied at import stage--Payment of sales tax by Steel Melters, Re- rollers and Ship Breakers----Option to pay sales tax on ad valorem basis---No less of revenue-Scope-Appellant Read More... |
2021 PTD 202 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S EJAZ BROTHERS STEEL FURNACE, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.3 & 6 Customs Act (IV of 1969), S.32 | Recovery of sales tax non-levied or short-levied at import |
Sales tax--Time and manner of payment of sales tax-Recovery of sales tax non-levied or short-levied at import stage-Scope-Collection, payment and enforcement of sales tax on imported goods is governed under Customs Act, 1969, as envisaged in S.6 of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2021 PTD 202 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S EJAZ BROTHERS STEEL FURNACE, GUJRANWALA VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.3 & 6 Customs Act (IV of 1969), S.32 | Coram Non Judice |
When an order is passed without jurisdiction it is coram non judice, it does not exist in the eyes of law and every person and authority has to ignore it. |
2021 PTD 202 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
SAWERA INDUSTRIES COTTON GINNING PRESSING FACTORY AND OIL MILLS AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN FBR AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.3, 13 & Sixth Sched. Sales Tax (Special Procedures) Rules, 2007, Chap. XV-SRO No.253(I)/2019 dated 26.02.2019 | Cotton Seed/ Exemption from sales tax |
Levy of sales tax---Cotton Seed---Exemption from sales tax----Statutory exemption from sales tax could not be overridden by notification/ SRO issued under Sales Tax Act, 1990--Scope---Petitioners impugned SRO No.253(I)/2019 dated 26.02.2019 which sought to recover Read More... |
2021 PTD 318 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
Messer Liberty Mills Limited through Authorized Director and 8 Others VS Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 5 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 8, 7, 4 & 3. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199-SRO No.1125(I)2011 dated 21.12.2011-SRO No.491(I)/ 2016 dated 30.06.2016- | Input tax adjustment of packing material |
Constitutional petition--Determination of sales tax liability-Zero-rating-Tax credit not allowed---Input tax adjustment---Scope-Petitioner taxpayers impugned insertion of proviso in SRO No.1125(I)2011 dated 21.12.2011 via SRO No.491(I)/2016 dated 30.06.2016; whereby Read More... |
2021 PTD 347 (2021) 124 TAX 239 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
Al Razzaq Fibers (Pvt.) Ltd, Through Authorized Representative and Others VS ORE Federation of Pakistan Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 3(2)(b), 4(e) & 74-A. Notifications SRO No. 1125(1)/2011 dated 31-12-2011. SRO No.584(1)/2017 dated 1-7-2017 | Notification, Vires of/ Increase in tax |
Notification, vires of- Increase in tax- Phrase Board with the approval of Federal Minister-in-Charge-Scope- Petitioners were tax-payers and their grievance was that power of Federal Government could not be substituted to Federal Minister-in-Charge for the purposes Read More... |
2021 PTD 542 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 2(46) & 3 | Value of supply |
Value of supply ---Power of Department to fix the value of any imported goods or taxable supplies under S.2(46) of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Nature of provisos to S.2(46) of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Petitioner impugned notification issued under S.2(46) of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2021 PTD 587 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 2(46) & 3 | Proviso |
Proviso to a statutory provision, construction of --- Principles ---“Proviso” to a section of a statute had an overriding effect and control over the whole section, and function of proviso was to exclude and take out certain cases from the rule to which Read More... |
2021 PTD 587 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2021 |
M/S AKHTAR COMPUTERS PAKISTAN VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Preamble. Finance Act 2006, Preamble & S.1. Provisional Collection of Taxes Act 1931, S.3 | Commencement of the Finance Act |
Commencement of the Finance Act, 2006---Amendment by Finance Act, 2006 in the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Not retrospective---Scope---Question before High Court was whether the Finance Act, 2006, was applicable with effect from 01-07-2006, for which declaration was issued Read More... |
2021 PTD 693 | (2020) 122 TAX 520 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
STIEFEL LABORATORIES PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUSTOMS, FEDERAL EXCISE & SALES TAX AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 11 | Assessment of tax and recovery |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Scope---Applicant was issued a show cause notice with the allegations that it imported “Fongitar and Polytar” liquid shampoos and got cleared the same by Read More... |
2021 PTD 699 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
STIEFEL LABORATORIES PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUSTOMS, FEDERAL EXCISE & SALES TAX AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 13 | Protection against double punishment |
Protection against double punishment and self-incrimination---Scope---One cannot be tried twice for the charge based on the same allegation and evidence in the same Read More... |
2021 PTD 699 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
SINDH PETROLEUM AND CNG DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 34 | Payment of Sales Tax Liability/ Default Surcharge |
Payment of sales tax liability---Default Surcharge---Recovery of default surcharge---Show cause notice and adjudication process to be followed for such recovery---Abdication of statutory duty by Department---Scope---Petitioners impugned notices for payment of sales Read More... |
2021 PTD 713 | (2021) 124 TAX 412 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
BASHIR PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3(1A). SRO No.1125(I)/2011, dated: 31-12-2011. SRO No.491(I)/2016, dated: 30-06-2016 | Further tax/ Special procedure/ Supplies to un-registered persons |
Further tax---Special procedure---Supplies to un-registered persons---Scope---Appellant was imposed upon further tax for its failure to pay further tax @2% of the value of supplies made to un-registered made to un-registered persons in terms of S.3(1A) of Sales Tax Read More... |
2021 PTD 831 | 2020 PTCL 779 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
BASHIR PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 3(1A) & 71. SRO No. 1125(I)/2011, dated: 31-12-2011. SRO No. 491(I)/2016 | Section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 override all other provisions of the Sales Tax Act |
Further tax---Special procedure---Scope---Section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 override all other provisions of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, including S.3 thereof, therefore, further tax cannot be imposed on the five sectors zero-rated goods. Non-obstante Read More... |
2021 PTD 831 | 2020 PTCL 779 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
M/S PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES, RAWALPINDI VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR ADJUDICATION & OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 11. General Clauses 1897, S. 24-A | Assessment of tax and recovery |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Reasons to be stated for decision---Scope---Department issued a show cause notice to the taxpayer, alleging therein that it had evaded sales tax, which culminated in passing Read More... |
2021 PTD 871 | (2020) 122 TAX 527 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S ATLAS POWER LIMITED; 23-C, AZIZ AVENUE, CANAL PARK, GULBERG-V, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 45B, 46(1)(b), | Orders of Appellate Tribunal/ binding |
Orders of Appellate Tribunal to be binding----Scope----Taxpayer assailed the order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue under Read More... |
2023 PTD 344 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S ATLAS POWER LIMITED; 23-C, AZIZ AVENUE, CANAL PARK, GULBERG-V, LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 45B, 46(1)(b), | Administration of justice |
Where two forums have concurrent jurisdiction, the aggrieved person in the first instance must preferably approach to the lower Read More... |
2023 PTD 344 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS MALIK ENTERPRISES |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 8, 8B, 66, 3 & 47 | Tax Credit not allowed/ Adjustment of input tax |
Claim of 100% adjustment of input tax---Nature of S.8B(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Department impugned order of Appellate Tribunal whereby it was held that taxpayer could adjust 100% of input tax---Contention of Department, inter alia, was that per S.8B(1) Read More... |
2021 PTD 945 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
M/S DEWAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 8, 7, 4 & 3. SRO 450(I)/2013 dated 27.05.2013 | Tax credit not allowed/ Determination of sales tax liability |
Input tax adjustment---Denial of input tax adjustment on direct constituents of taxable supply---Scope---Petitioners/taxpayers impugned show-cause notice issued by Department whereby certain input tax adjustments claimed by petitioners were deemed Read More... |
2021 PTD 1007 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2021 |
DIRECTOR (I & I) (INLAND REVENUE), ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS VS NAEEM SIDDIQUE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 2(37), 33(13), 33(7), 11 & 74A | Tax fraud/ Failure to apply for registration |
Failure to apply for registration, assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Validation---Scope---Appellants assailed order passed by Judge Special Court (Customs, Taxation and Anti-Smuggling(, whereby the respondent Read More... |
2021 PTD 1047 | (2020) 122 TAX 510 | 2021 PTCL 746 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
RELIANCE PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE AND 7 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S.40B. Finance Act 2018, S.6(11). General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.6 | Posting of Officers of Inland Revenue at manufacturing premises |
Posting of Officers of Inland Revenue / Federal Board of Revenue (“FBR”) at manufacturing premises of taxpayer---Omission of proviso to S.40B of Sales Tax Act, 1990 vide Finance Act, 2018---Effect---Plaintiff impugned order of Commissioner to post Read More... |
2021 PTD 1082 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
MESSRS SAHIB DIN LOGISTICS AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 37 & 30A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Unexplained income and assets |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Conduct of inquiries by Sales Tax Authorities---Power to summon person to give evidence and produce documents in inquiries---Scope---Petitioners impugned notices issued under S.37 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 on ground that same Read More... |
2021 PTD 1245 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
MESSRS SAHIB DIN LOGISTICS AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 37 & 30A. Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Quo Warranto |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Writ of quo-warranto---Essentials---While considering a writ in nature of quo warranto, it was imperative to consider intent and motive of petitioner(s), and if it was manifest that petitioner had invoked Constitutional Read More... |
2021 PTD 1245 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2021 |
M/S HILAL DYES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 45A | Power of the Federal Board and Commissioner IR to call for record |
Power of the Federal Board of Revenue and Commissioner (Inland Revenue) to call for record---Expression “satisfying himself”---Scope---Appellant assailed the order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR) whereby he, while exercising power under Read More... |
2021 PTD 1249 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
KAMRAN TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 72B & 25 | Selection of audit of taxpayer |
Selection of audit of taxpayer under S.72B of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Access to records and documents under S.25 of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Distinction between nature and scope of powers under Ss.25 & 72B of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Sections 25 & 72B of Sales Tax Read More... |
2021 PTD 1253 | (2021) 123 TAX 167 | 2021 PTCL 708 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2021 |
MESSRS NIMSAY REDEFINING STYLE (PVT.) LTD
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 11 & 3(1A). SRO No. 1125(I)/2011, dated: 31-12-2011 SRO No. 648(I)/2013 | Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Further tax---Supply to END Consumer---Scope---Appellant was imposed upon a liability for its failure to pay full amount of further tax @ 2% in respect of supplies made to Read More... |
2021 PTD 1266 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2021 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS FERROUS ENGINEERING INDUSTRY |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 8B | Adjustable input tax |
Adjustment of input tax in excess of ninety per cent---Procedural lapse---Scope---Department assailed the registered person’s act of adjusting 100% input tax instead of 90% in violation of S.8B of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Validity---Department was seeking Read More... |
2021 PTD 1270 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS VS PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Sec.25, 45, 46 and 72-C | Powers of Commissioner-IR |
(i) Whether under s.25(1) of the 1990 Act, (“the Commissioner”) and under s.45 of the 2005 Act, (“the Officer of Inland Revenue”) can have access to records or documents without assigning any reasons. The Read More... |
2020 PTD 297Â |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
INDUS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS VS PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S .25, 45, 46 and 72-C | Audit / selection for Audit |
12). We find that the process of balloting was conducted from amongst a pool of persons objectively determined by the Board in accordance with a transparent policy, uniformly applied in accordance with law. The process was undertaken Read More... |
2020 PTD 297Â |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS HILAL CHEMICALS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 21, 7, 8 & 2(37) | Blacklisting |
While denying adjustment of input tax on ground of tax fraud, initial burden lay on Department to establish that invoices had been issued during a period where a supplier for suspended or blacklisted – In case invoices were not Read More... |
2020 PTD 232 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS HILAL CHEMICALS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 21, 7, 8 & 2(37) | Tax invoices |
While denying adjustment of input tax on ground of tax fraud, initial burden lay on Department to establish that invoices had been issued during a period where a supplier for suspended or blacklisted – In case invoices were not Read More... |
2020 PTD 232 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 2(37), 2(9), 2(14)(a), 3, 6, 78, 78(1)(a) & 73, 33(3), (5), (8), (He), (13), (16), (18) | Bail before arrest, confirmation |
However, the case of the applicant is quite distinguishing. No doubt, he has been charged with tax evasion and the criminal case is still pending against him and the same should be decided on its merits but it is also a fact that after Read More... |
2020 PTD 227 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 2(37), 2(9), 2(14)(a), 3, 6, 78, 78(1)(a) & 73, 33(3), (5), (8), (He), (13), (16), (18) | Bail before arrest, confirmation |
Applicant, named in supplementary final report (challan) without any specific role challenged the order of recovery passed by Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax before Commissioner of Sales Tax which was allowed- Department did not Read More... |
2020 PTD 227 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 2(37), 2(9), 2(14)(a), 3, 6, 78, 78(1)(a) & 73, 33(3), (5), (8), (He), (13), (16), (18) | supplementary final report (challan) |
Applicant, named in supplementary final report (challan) without any specific role challenged the order of recovery passed by Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax before Commissioner of Sales Tax which was allowed- Department did not Read More... |
2020 PTD 227 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2020 |
BOARDS OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, ABBOTTABAD VS THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Ss.14(8), 9 & 2(3) Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.171 | Additional payment for delayed refunds |
Complainant/taxpayer sought review of order of FTO whereby complaint against, inter alia, non-payment of additional payment for delayed refund, was rejected on ground that Federal Tax Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction. |
2020 PTD 557 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
M/S FAMOUS SWEETS, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 26, 23, 2(40), 3 & 25 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 6 | Audit of unregistered tax person/ Compulsory registration/ Non-filing of sales return |
Dept., during scrutiny of income tax returns of taxpayer, observed certain discrepancies and issued a show cause notice to the taxpayer confronting sales tax liability along with default surcharge and penalty. |
2020 PTD 562 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
M/S FAMOUS SWEETS, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxation |
Tax cannot be charged and levied unless it falls squarely within the purview of the charging provisions. |
2020 PTD 562 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2020 |
M/S FAMOUS SWEETS, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing statute |
Taxing statute-Scope-Only the letter of law, in fiscal statutes, has to be looked into and there is no room for any intendment, equity or presumption-Fiscal statutes were to be strictly constructed, as far as liability to tax is Read More... |
2020 PTD 562 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
ABBASI ENTERPRISES UNILEVER DISTRIBUTOR, HARIPUR
AND ANOTHER VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 11, 36(3) | Time barred show cause notice |
Taxpayer was aggrieved of show cause notice issued by authorities beyond period specified in law---Plea raised by authorities was that order of extension was made on 24-09-2010 whereas judgment in case titled 'Collector of Sales Tax Read More... |
2020 PTD 147 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, KARACHI VS NAFEES-UR-REHMAN BARRY AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 13, 33(13), 6th, 8th | Penalty |
Illegal claim of exemption-Appeal against acquittal-Absence of mens rea-Scope-Case against accused persons was that they were involved in unlawful and illegal claim of zero rated exemption of sales tax on import of processed cheese Read More... |
2020 PTD 163 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HUMAK ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH CEO VS THE MODEL COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS (MCC), ISLAMABAD THROUGH COLLECTOR AND 4 OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 176, 196 | Recovery of Short Payment |
Petitioner assailed order-in-original passed by Collector of Customs Read More... |
2020 PTD 568 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
QUAID-E-AZAM THERMAL PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LAHORE VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 33(19), 48(1)(b) | Fundamental Rights |
Fundamental Rights of Fair Trial, Right to Information and Right of individuals to be dealt with in accordance with law-Nature and scope-Articles 10A & 19A of the Constitution guarantee that necessary information be disclosed and a Read More... |
2020 PTD 165 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS HUMAK ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH CEO VS THE MODEL COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS (MCC), ISLAMABAD THROUGH COLLECTOR AND 4 OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 176, 196 | Reference/ Fundamental rights |
Question relating to fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution cannot be agitated in Reference/advisory jurisdiction of High Court as the scope of advisory jurisdiction is limited to the extent of questions of law arising out of Read More... |
2020 PTD 568 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
QUAID-E-AZAM THERMAL PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LAHORE VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 33(19), 48(1)(b) | Attachment of Bank Accounts |
Attachment of its Bank Accounts for recovery of outstanding liabilities under S.48 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 read with R. 71 of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006 - Contention of taxpayer, inter alia, was that mandatory time period of 30 days Read More... |
2020 PTD 165 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
THE DIRECTOR, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR VS M/S EKADA CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 3, 3DD, 4, 26A, 80, 83, 180, 193, 195 | Audit/Notice/ Reasonable time |
Officer of Customs is empowered to conduct audit, inquiry or investigation of an importer for the purpose of ascertaining the correctness of any declaration, document or statement for determining the liability of duty, taxes, fees, Read More... |
2020 PTD 573 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
QUAID-E-AZAM THERMAL PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LAHORE VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 33(19), 48(1)(b) | Fair Trial |
Attachment of its Bank Accounts for recovery of outstanding liabilities under S.48 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 read with R. 71 of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006 - Contention of taxpayer, inter alia, was that mandatory time period of 30 days Read More... |
2020 PTD 165 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
THE DIRECTOR, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR VS M/S EKADA CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 3, 3DD, 4, 26A, 80, 83, 180, 193, 195 | Audit of sales tax |
Directorate General of Post Clearance Audit---Jurisdiction---Deputy Director of Post Clearance Audit is not empowered to issue audit observation in the matter of sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 573 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
THE DIRECTOR, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR VS M/S EKADA CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 3, 3DD, 4, 26A, 80, 83, 180, 193, 195 | Audit of income tax |
Directorate General of Post Clearance Audit-Jurisdiction-Officials of Directorate General of Post Clearance Audit are not designated as officers of Inland Revenue under S. 228 or any other section of ITO, 2001and as such are not empowered to carry out audit Read More... |
2020 PTD 573 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
THE DIRECTOR, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR VS M/S EKADA CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 3, 3DD, 4, 26A, 80, 83, 180, 193, 195 | Audit of Income Tax |
Collector of Customs (Adjudication) is not designated as an officer of Inland Revenue under S. 30, ST Act, 1990 or under any section of ITO, 2001and as such is not empowered to exercise powers under any section of ST Act, 1990 and Read More... |
2020 PTD 573 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
THE DIRECTOR, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR VS M/S EKADA CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 3, 3DD, 4, 26A, 80, 83, 180, 193, 195 | Power of Board or Collector u/s 195 |
Order passed by Competent Authority under the provisions of Ss. 80 & 83 of Customs Act, 1969 and Rr. 438 & 442 of Customs Rules, 2001 could only be corrected by revisional Authority in exercise of power under S. 195 of Customs Read More... |
2020 PTD 573 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
ASIF IQBAL VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 10 & 33 | Trial of a Clerk |
If such a scam has taken place in the department, why the responsible officers of the department were not put to task for registration of a fake concern with the office of the Sales Tax Department. Even, no effort was taken during the Read More... |
2020 PTD 237 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
ASIF IQBAL VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 10 & 33 | Penalty |
Accused was convicted and sentenced by Trial Court for receiving illegal tax refunds through forged, manipulated, falsified and bogus invoices- Validity- Process of registration of a concern was manifold in which physical verification Read More... |
2020 PTD 237 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
ASIF IQBAL VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 10 & 33 | FIR |
Accused was convicted and sentenced by Trial Court for receiving illegal tax refunds through forged, manipulated, falsified and bogus invoices- Validity- Process of registration of a concern was manifold in which physical verification Read More... |
2020 PTD 237 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ZAK RE-ROLLING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 3(1A), 47 | Steel Melter |
Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007, R. 58H---Steel-melter---Taxable supplies made to unregistered persons--- Levy of further sales tax under S. 3(1A) of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Permissibility---Payment of sales tax under a specific Read More... |
2020 PTD 382 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ZAK RE-ROLLING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 3(1A), 47 | Further Tax |
10). Learned counsel for the petitioner on conclusion of his arguments tried to argue that the Capital Development Authority has been collecting CVT or that it should be directed to do so. We have found the arguments of the learned Read More... |
2020 PTD 382 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS ZAK RE-ROLLING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S: 12(18), 13(aa) | Loans, advances and gifts |
8. A plain reading of section 12(18) of the Ordinance shows that the said provision is attracted when loans, advances and gifts are received in cash. However, in the case before us, admittedly, no cash exchanged hands. Members of the AOP Read More... |
2020 PTD 382 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S: 10, 11 & 21 | Black Listed or deregistered |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S: 10, 11 & 21 | Flying Invoices |
It is the contention of counsel for the applicant Department that as the invoices issued from those sellers, who were subsequently declared as blacklisted or de-registered; therefore, no refund can be allowed to the respondent. In Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. SIALKOT VS THE CIR, ZONE-IV, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 11(2) & 38 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 13 | Difference in stocks/Recovery of sales tax/Second Show Cause/ Doctrine of double jeopardy |
Commissioner Inland Revenue passed impugned order on the basis of stock taking carried out on 11-12-2017 under S. 38 and passed the impugned order pertaining to the tax periods starting from April 2015 to October 2017, whereas the Dept. Read More... |
2020 PTD 585 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S: 10, 11 & 21 | Pecuniary jurisdiction |
So far as the Question No. 1 is concerned, the same pertains to pecuniary jurisdiction of the officer, who has passed Order-in-Original. In a case involving contravention on the part of a registered person with respect of assessment of Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. SIALKOT VS THE CIR, ZONE-IV, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3(1A), 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 25, 25(2), 26, 11, 11(2), 38 | Difference in stocks/Recovery of sales tax |
Assessment and recovery of sales tax- Assessing Authority, on physical stock taking of registered person under S. 38 of ST Act, 1990, observed considerable difference between declared closing stocks and physical closing stocks of Read More... |
2020 PTD 585 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COMMISSIONER (LEGAL), INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, HYDERABAD VS MESSRS FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD. |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S: 10, 11 & 21 | Monetary Limit of Refund |
So far as the Question No. 1 is concerned, the same pertains to pecuniary jurisdiction of the officer, who has passed Order-in-Original. In a case involving contravention on the part of a registered person with respect of assessment of Read More... |
2020 PTD 203 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. SIALKOT VS THE CIR, ZONE-IV, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3(1A), 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 25, 25(2), 26, 11, 11(2), 38 | Taxation/ Double jeopardy |
Taxation---Presumption--Taxpayer can only be subjected to under unambiguous and clear provision of law--No room intendment and no presumption as to tax. -Double jeopardy--Person cannot be vexed twice for the same Read More... |
2020 PTD 585 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. SIALKOT VS THE CIR, ZONE-IV, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3(1A), 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 25, 25(2), 26, 11, 11(2), 38 | access to premises, Stock accounts and records |
No provision for conducting an audit of a taxpayer in S. 38, ST Act, 1990--- Officer of Inland Revenue empowered by FBR or Commissioner could have free access to the premises, stocks, accounts and records to examine and take into custody such records to inquire and Read More... |
2020 PTD 585 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2020 |
M/S SHABAN STEEL INDUSTRY THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 27-A | Scrap/Recycling/Mutilating and scraping of serviceable goods |
Import of re-rollable scrap---Recycling---Mutilating and scraping of serviceable goods---Object, purpose and scope---Purpose of mutilating and scrapping of serviceable goods is to convert them into unserviceable condition---Permitting Read More... |
2020 PTD 594 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2020 |
M/S SHABAN STEEL INDUSTRY THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 27-A | Scrap/Recycling/Mutilating and scraping of serviceable goods |
Law is something that has been passed through legislative process. By contrast, Rule is something that has been created by executive, by exercising power conferred upon them by law---Law carries more weight which prevails, as such, Rules Read More... |
2020 PTD 594 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2020 |
M/S SHABAN STEEL INDUSTRY THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 27-A | Interpretation of statutes |
Law is something that has been passed through legislative process. By contrast, Rule is something that has been created by executive, by exercising power conferred upon them by law---Law carries more weight which prevails, as such, Rules Read More... |
2020 PTD 594 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2020 |
M/S SHABAN STEEL INDUSTRY THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 27-A | mutilation and scrapping |
Petitioners were importers of re-roll-able scrap and were aggrieved of seizure of their imported products by customs authorities---Plea raised by customs authorities was that imported goods were prime quality goods and not scrap Read More... |
2020 PTD 594 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SHAFQAT ELAHI SHAIKH VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 62, 135 | Capital gain/Taxable income/Adventure in nature of trade |
Taxpayer sold his property and relocated to another place due to security concerns but tax authorities added capital gain from sale of property as taxable income under adventure in nature of trade---Plea raised by Dept. was that income Read More... |
2020 PTD 604 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MOIN JAMAL ABBASI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND 2 OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 19, 223, First Schedule | Payment of cumulative amount |
Petitioner imported a vintage vehicle but of same was denied on grounds that there was ambiguity in law regarding imposition of taxes on vintage vehicles. No reference to any other restriction or Read More... |
2020 PTD 660 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS THROUGH ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS VS MUHAMMAD ARIF UR REHMAN AND ANOTHER |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 156, 196 | Payment of cumulative amount/old record |
ten years old could be demanded from importer---Mere presumption as to allegation of smuggling in absence of any tangible material or evidence could not be approved particularly in respect of importable article beyond period available to Read More... |
2020 PTD 627 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2020 |
M/s MAC CORPORATION, KARACHI VS The DEPUTY COLLECTOR (PREVENTIVE), SUKKUR, MCC OF HYDERABAD and 2 others |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(s), 2(s)(ii), 3DD, 9, 10, 26, 26A, 156(2), 177, 179, 180, 187 | Transportation of goods valuing less than one hundred and fifty thousand rupees |
Appellant imported goods which were being transported to his buyer when the officers of customs intercepted the vehicle---Officers of Customs detained the goods on failure of driver of the vehicle to produce valid import documents-Deputy Read More... |
2020 PTD 632 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2020 |
M/s MAC CORPORATION, KARACHI VS The DEPUTY COLLECTOR (PREVENTIVE), SUKKUR, MCC OF HYDERABAD and 2 others |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(s), 2(s)(ii), 3DD, 9, 10, 26, 26A, 156(2), 177, 179, 180, 187 | Power of adjudication---Show-cause notice--- Pecuniary jurisdiction |
Appellant imported goods which were being transported to his buyer when the officers of Customs intercepted the vehicle---Officers of Customs detained the goods on failure of driver of the vehicle to produce valid import Read More... |
2020 PTD 632 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2020 |
M/s MAC CORPORATION, KARACHI VS The DEPUTY COLLECTOR (PREVENTIVE), SUKKUR, MCC OF HYDERABAD and 2 others |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(s), 2(s)(ii), 3DD, 9, 10, 26, 26A, 156(2), 177, 179, 180, 187 | Restriction on the possession of goods in certain areas |
Smuggling---Officers of Customs---Jurisdiction--Scope---Appellant imported goods which were transported to his buyer when the officers of Customs intercepted the vehicle---Deputy Collector (Preventive) detained the goods on failure of Read More... |
2020 PTD 632 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2020 |
M/s MAC CORPORATION, KARACHI VS The DEPUTY COLLECTOR (PREVENTIVE), SUKKUR, MCC OF HYDERABAD and 2 others |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(s), 2(s)(ii), 3DD, 9, 10, 26, 26A, 156(2), 177, 179, 180, 187 | Appellant imported goods which were being transported to his buyer |
Appellant imported goods which were being transported to his buyer when the officers of customs intercepted the vehicle---Officers of Customs detained the goods on failure of driver to produce valid import documents---Deputy Collector of Read More... |
2020 PTD 632 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2020 |
M/s MAC CORPORATION, KARACHI VS The DEPUTY COLLECTOR (PREVENTIVE), SUKKUR, MCC OF HYDERABAD and 2 others |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 2(s), 2(s)(ii), 3DD, 9, 10, 26, 26A, 156(2), 177, 179, 180, 187 | Audit by Directorate General of Post Clearance (Audit) |
Procedure---Power of adjudication---Scope--- Record of case can only be demanded by Directorate General of Post Clearance Audit for conducting audit under S. 26(2), Customs Act, 1969 after serving notice/summon as per contemplation of Read More... |
2020 PTD 632 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
MESSRS SAPNA ENTERPRISES, PESHAWAR VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION), MCC, PESHAWAR AND 3 OTHERS |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 32(3A), 156(1)(14) 4, 3, 6, 33 | Zero Rating |
Brief facts of the case are that according to a contravention case the appellants imported 11 consignments of monofilaments yarn and classified the goods in Read More... |
2020 PTD 50 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan | 2020 |
MESSRS GENERATION (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(43A), 3, 3(9A) | Option to pay sales tax under the turnover regime |
Tier-1 retailers---Option to pay sales tax under the turnover regime---Scope---Taxpayer as per provisions of S. 3(9A) of ST Act, 1990 applied to the Commissioner Inland Revenue, Large Taxpayers Unit for exercising its option to pay sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 648 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)a 2(37), 11, 25, 38, 40, 72B | Authorized officer to have access to premise stocks, accounts and records |
Authorized officer to have access to premise stocks, accounts and records---Assessment of tax and recovery of t not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Scope---Director General of Intelligence and Investigation, during the Read More... |
2020 PTD 666 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)a 2(37), 11, 25, 38, 40, 72B | Searches under warrant/Search to be made in presence of witnesses |
Authorized Officer to have access to premises, stocks, accounts and records---Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Searches under warrant---Search to be made in presence of Read More... |
2020 PTD 666 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)a 2(37), 11, 25, 38, 40, 72B | Sales tax is premised on a self-assessment paradigm |
Sales tax is premised on a self-assessment paradigm, where the sales tax due is self-assessed by taxpayer and deposited along with the monthly sales tax return Supervision and monitoring of the self-assessment regime is through the Read More... |
2020 PTD 666 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S. BLUE ENTERPRISES LAHORE VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (GROUP-IV), MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-WEST, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 3(1)(6)(b), 4, 4(2)(c)(b), 8, 71 | Non-Obstante Clause |
Similarly, the Indian Supreme Court in Chandavarkar S.R. Rao v. Asha Lata S. Guram 1986 4 SCC 447 held as under; “A clause beginning with the expression Read More... |
2020 PTD 241 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)a 2(37), 11, 25, 38, 40, 72B | Recovery of tax from a taxpayer, without due process of adjudication |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Scope---Recovery of tax from a taxpayer, without due process of adjudication of the case cannot be equated with confession or admission of the charge---Coercive recovery from Read More... |
2020 PTD 666 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S. BLUE ENTERPRISES LAHORE VS THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (GROUP-IV), MCC OF APPRAISEMENT-WEST, KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 3(1)(6)(b), 4, 4(2)(c)(b), 8, 71 | Zero Rating |
Federal government is empowered to notify any goods on which sales tax shall be charged at the rate of zero percent, despite availability of S.3 of the Sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 241 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S ISLAM SOAP INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., SIALKOT VS THE CIR, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)a 2(37), 11, 25, 38, 40, 72B | Tax fraud---Burden of proof |
Initial burden, in order to attract the provisions of S. 2(37), ST Act, 1990, lies on the Dept. to show that the registered person, knowingly, dishonestly or fraudulently and without any lawful excuse has done any act or caused any act Read More... |
2020 PTD 666 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
SAFE MIX CONCRETE LIMITED THROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY (REVENUE DIVISION) AND 4 OTHERS |
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) 20(c), 20, 9, O. VII, R. 10, O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2 | Territorial Jurisdiction |
The Plaintiff has primarily impugned show-cause notice dated 24.01.2017 issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore / Defendant No.4 through which it Read More... |
2020 PTD 263 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE VS M/S AGRO CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD. |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 79, 104 | Input tax adjustment---Amendment in law |
Taxpayer claimed input tax adjustments against bill-of-entry of its sister concern on goods imported---Authorities in order-in-original denied input tax adjustments but Lower Appellate Court allowed the same---Authorities assailed Read More... |
2020 PTD 679 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE VS M/S AGRO CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD. |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 79, 104 | Referential legislation/ Types |
Referential legislation is of two types--One is where an earlier legislation or some of its provisions are incorporated in subsequent legislation; in such case, provision of earlier legislation or its portion so incorporated are Read More... |
2020 PTD 679 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE VS M/S AGRO CHEMICAL (PVT.) LTD. |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) 79, 104 | Declaratory amendment/vested rights |
Declaratory amendment---Retrospectively--- Object, purpose and scope---Every statute, prima facie, has prospective application unless it is expressly provided that same will have retrospective operation---Not necessary that a declaratory Read More... |
2020 PTD 679 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MUHAMMAD AKRAM YOUSUF VS THE STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 33(3), 33(5), 33(8), 33(11C), 33(13), 33(16), 33(18) | Use of login and passwords of a company by some fraudsters |
Use of login and passwords of a company by some fraudsters to file fake sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 710 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
JAMIL SWEETS / JAMEEL SWEETS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan 199 | Judicial review of delegated |
Judicial review of delegated / subordinate legislation---Scrutiny of the Constitutionality of legislation by High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution---Scope---Delegated legislation beyond powers conferred by parents statute---Principles of judicial review of Read More... |
2020 PTD 752 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
JAMIL SWEETS / JAMEEL SWEETS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan 199 | Delegated Legislation/ Rules / regulations framed under a statute |
Nature and object of such legislation---Construction of delegated legislation---Invalidity of delegated legislation---Scope---Provisions of a statute, if they dealt with a subject matter in considerable detail, then scope of delegated Read More... |
2020 PTD 752 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
JAMIL SWEETS / JAMEEL SWEETS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan 199 | Monitoring or tracking of certain registered persons by electronic or other means |
Monitoring or tracking of certain registered persons by electronic or other means---Point-of-sale real time monitoring of transactions of retailers---Power of Dept. to frame / amend Sales Tax Rules, 2006---Petitioners / taxpayers Read More... |
2020 PTD 752 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
JAMIL SWEETS / JAMEEL SWEETS VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan 199 | Judicial review of statutory provisions |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Judicial review of statutory provisions---Scope---Statute could broadly challenge if it was in violation of guaranteed Fundamental Rights on ground that it was beyond capacity of the Read More... |
2020 PTD 752 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS Messrs WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Federal Excise Act, 2005 3 & Third Schedule, Table II, S. No. 2 | Internet service/Exemption |
Transmission of voice content through the internet---Exempted from Federal Excise Duty---All telecommunication facilities availed through the internet were exempted from Federal Excise Duty irrespective of their nature---Internet Read More... |
2020 PTD 769 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD VS Messrs WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Federal Excise Act, 2005 3 & Third Schedule, Table II, S. No. 2 | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal provision of a statute had to be construed liberally in favour of the tax Read More... |
2020 PTD 769 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS NAEEM BROTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(37), 8(1)(ca), 21(3), 47 | Blacklisting and suspension of registration of registered person/Tax Credit |
Blacklisting and suspension of registration of registered person---Tax fraud---Burden of proof-Scope---Registered person was alleged to have received refund of input tax against the sales tax invoices issued by suspended/blacklisted Read More... |
2020 PTD 821 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS NAEEM BROTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(37), 8(1)(ca), 21(3), 47 | input tax (tax credit) should not be allowed for an invoice against which sales tax has not been deposited |
Intention of Legislature as discernible from the provisions of S. 21(3) read with S. 8(1)(ca), of the ST Act, 1990 is that reclaim (refund) or adjustment of input tax (tax credit) should not be allowed for an invoice against which sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 821 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S. SWEETY TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABA VS CIR, CORPORATE ZONE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 45A, 8, 73, 21 | Tax credit not allowed/Transactions to be made through banking channel |
Adjudication Officer after scrutinizing the detail of suppliers through computer database system through banking observed that certain suppliers had not declared or less declared the channel---Scope---Adjudication Officer after sales Read More... |
2020 PTD 907 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S. SWEETY TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABA VS CIR, CORPORATE ZONE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 45A, 8, 73, 21 | Tax credit not allowed |
Adjudication Officer during the course of examination of sales tax return of the registered person observed that it had claimed/adjusted input tax against the invoices issued by the suspended/blacklisted units Registered person had Read More... |
2020 PTD 907 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/S. SWEETY TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABA VS CIR, CORPORATE ZONE, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 45A, 8, 73, 21 | Tax credit not allowed/purchased declared by buyers |
Adjudicating Officer during the comparison of supplies made by the registered person and purchases declared by the buyers observed that supplies to certain extent of sales tax were not declared by the buyers in their sales tax Read More... |
2020 PTD 907 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, LAHORE VS MESSRS TETRAPAK PAKISTAN LIMITED |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(ca), 47, 177 | question of law |
Applicant assailed order passed by Appellate Tribunal---Appellate Tribunal had observed that order-in-original was based on a defective notice bearing false figures of input tax never claimed by the registered person---High Court observed that only substantial legal Read More... |
2020 PTD 917 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2020 |
SW SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD through Chaiman and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11 | Civil and criminal proceedings. Stay of criminal proceedings |
Tax fraud- Assessment of sales tax. Civil and criminal proceedings. Stay of criminal proceedings. Scope. Petitioner prayed for quashing of FIR lodged against him. Pre-trial steps including arrest and Read More... |
2020 PTD 925 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s AL-IKHLAS PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 7, 7A, 8B, 11, 73 | input tax against invoices issued by suspended unit |
Dept., during audit proceedings, concluded that registered person had illegally adjusted inadmissible 'input tax against invoices issued by suspended unit |
2020 PTD 543 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s AL-IKHLAS PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 11 | Show Cause Notice contains no particular allegations |
Dept. conducted audit of registered person's sales tax records which resulted into certain discrepancies on the basis of which show cause notice was issued---ACIR passed sales tax order-in-original-Being dissatisfied and aggrieved by the said order registered person Read More... |
2020 PTD 543 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s AL-IKHLAS PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 3 | Tax on sales cannot be imposed |
Tax on sales cannot be imposed and levied without establishing, clandestine removal of goods and receipt of money consideration in its respect---Without building said relationship, no tax can be assessed and recovered Read More... |
2020 PTD 543 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s AL-IKHLAS PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 7A | Valued addition, Tax on specified goods on value addition |
Allegation against the registered person was that he had declared value addition @ 8% which was on much lower side when compared with the other units engaged in the same business---Neither the goods in question were notified by the Federal Government under S. 7A, ST Read More... |
2020 PTD 543 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s AL-IKHLAS PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS THE CIR(A), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 7A | Value addition, Revenue Authorities has no power to fix |
No addition can be made in the value merely on the basis of estimates and presumptions or even by comparing sales and profitability of a registered person over its years of business as it is not a divine factum that a business always earns profit without embracing Read More... |
2020 PTD 543 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) LTU, KARACHI VS M/S LINDE PAK LTD., KARACHI |
Interpretation of statutes | Instrument/Definition and meaning |
The term 'instrument' has been defined in its ordinary sense, as a written legal document that defines rights, duties, entitlements or liabilities, such as statute, contract, will, promissory note or share certificate and with reference to commercial law, the terms Read More... |
2020 PTD 549 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) LTU, KARACHI VS M/S LINDE PAK LTD., KARACHI |
Interpretation of statutes | Agreement/Definition and meaning |
An 'agreement' is a manifestation of mutual assent by two or more persons, and as the parties’ actual bargain founded in their language, or by implication from other circumstances'. It is an act in law whereby two or more persons declare their consent as to Read More... |
2020 PTD 549 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) LTU, KARACHI VS M/S LINDE PAK LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) 50(7D), 52 | Bond; Certificate; Debenture; security; Definition and Meaning |
A 'bond' has been described as a "document containing confession of a debt", as a "written promise to pay money", or to do some act if certain circumstances occur, or a certain time elapse. There is no distinction between bonds and 'certificates of indebtedness' Read More... |
2020 PTD 549 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) LTU, KARACHI VS M/S LINDE PAK LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 [since repealed] S. 50(7D) | Finance/loan agreement/Mark-up accrued |
Tax Dept. found that the respondent company had not deducted and paid tax on the mark-up accrued in terms of a finance/loan agreement executed between the respondent-company and a consortium of financial institutions and commercial banks, in respect of a long term Read More... |
2020 PTD 549 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2020 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I) LTU, KARACHI VS M/S LINDE PAK LTD., KARACHI |
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI OF 1979) [since repealed] S 50(7D) | Ejusdem generis |
Ejusdem generis meant 'the same kind or class', which required that when a general word or phrase followed a list of specifics the former would be interpreted to include only the items of the same class as those listed-Where a word of wider meaning was included in a Read More... |
2020 PTD 549 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2019 |
INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-V, RTO II, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 48 Income Tax Ord., 2001 S. 128(1A) (1AA) | Interim injunction, grant of by appellate Authority |
Interim injunction, grant of by appellate Authority--- Principles---Taxpayer was aggrieved of notice issued by taxation officer under S.48 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 which he assailed before appellate authority where appeal was pending---Appellate authority neither Read More... |
2019 PTD 1201 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LYALLPUR ZONE, FAISALABAD AND 3 OTHERS VS M/S. IMRAN ALI LUBRICANTS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 21 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.12 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 10A & 18 | Blacklisting and suspension of registration |
Exercise of discretion by Sales Tax Authorities-Vires of R. 12 of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006---Fundamental Rights to fair trial, due process of law and freedom of trade and business-Scope- Dept. impugned order passed by Single Judge of High Court in Constitutional Read More... |
2019 PTD 1213 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LYALLPUR ZONE, FAISALABAD AND 3 OTHERS VS M/S. IMRAN ALI LUBRICANTS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 10A- | Fundamental Right to fair trial |
Fundamental Right to fair trial-Article 10A of the Constitution ensured the right to fair trial and an Authority was under duty to confront any person against whom any adverse order was being passed, with proper notice detailing reasons for taking such action-No Read More... |
2019 PTD 1213 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2019 |
PRIME TRADDERS, ISLAMABAD VS THE CIR, R.T.O, Islamabad High Court High Court |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 2(14),7(2)(i),7,8,8(1)(ca),11,11(2),11(3),25,38,72B,73 | Registered person had claimed inadmissible input adjustment against invoices |
Registered person had claimed inadmissible input adjustment against invoices- Input adjustment against blacklisted units, were also added in the tow-cause notice---Assessing Officer initiated proceedings against the registered person for Read More... |
2019 PTD 1108 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2019 |
M/S. DIAMOND FABRICS LIMITED, KARACHI VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONEV, L.T.U., KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 7,8,8(1)(b),11,25,33,34,45B | Electrical fittings, pipes, wires, cables, etc., were those directly used in taxable activity |
Input tax, adjustment of- Authorities disallowed input tax on grounds that proper evidence/supporting documents by taxpayer---Plea raised by taxpayer was that proper opportunity of hearing was not allowed to him and claim of input sales Read More... |
2019 PTD 1166 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PAKISTAN MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MARDAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 13(1) | Proviso-Meaning and scope |
Provisos were intended to qualify the main part of the provision and carve out an exception from the same, taking out (as it were) something that but for the proviso would be included therein-Such provisos were generally referred to as "true" provisos-Sometimes a Read More... |
2019 PTD 1299 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PAKISTAN MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD, and others
VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MARDAN |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 13(1) S.R.O. 77(1)/95 dated 19-01-1995 ("SRO 77"), as amended by S.R.O. 87(1)/96 dated 30-01-1996 | Proviso-Meaning and scope |
Exemption from sales tax---'Proviso, interpretation of--First proviso to SRO 77' provided that exemption (from sales tax) shall be available to only such industrial units which had opened letters of credit for the import of plant and machinery upto the 31st January, Read More... |
2019 PTD 1299 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PAKISTAN MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MARDAN AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Fiscal Statute---Exemption from tax- |
---Fiscal Statute---Exemption from tax-Where two reasonable interpretations of an exemption were possible, the one against the taxpayer and in favour of the revenue would be adopted. |
2019 PTD 1299 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
PAKISTAN MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MARDAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 47 | Reference to High Court |
Questions of law-In case of a tax reference before the High Court, all factual aspects of the case were closed by, and at the level of, the Appellate Tribunal; and it was only questions of law that could travel to the High Court---Factual points could not be allowed Read More... |
2019 PTD 1299 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, LARGE
TAXPAYER UNIT-II, KARACHI VS MESSRS ORI TECH OIL (PVT.) LTD. |
Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007 R. 58B, proviso (i)-- Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 2(17) | Value Addition Tax (VAT), levy of Manufacturer definition / Toll Blending Agreement |
Value Addition Tax (VAT), levy of Manufacturer', definition of---Scope--- Raw material imported by a "manufacturer" for his own consumption-Respondent-company, imported certain base oil and additives for use as raw material, which raw material they got blended into Read More... |
2019 PTD 1342 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
SAMI PHARMACEUTICALS (PVT.) LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 13(2)(a) | Exemption from customs duty and sales tax |
Question before the High Court related to the circumstances in which a revised return filed under S.57 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, was to be treated at par with a return filed under S.55 of the same Ordinance--- Held, that Read More... |
2019 PTD 718 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, FAISALABAD VS MESSRS MAGNA TEXTILE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 45A-Exercise of powers under S.45A(4) | Powers of the Commissioner to suo motu call for |
Powers of the Commissioner to suo motu call for record of any legal proceedings under Sales Tax Act, 1990---Delegation of revisional jurisdiction by the Commissioner----Scope--Delegation of jurisdiction conferred under S.45A(4) of the Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2019 PTD 594 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2019 |
MESSRS WAPDA MANGLA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
FINANCE (POWER)/CHIEF ENGINEER VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (PT) AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL, MIRPUR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 47 | Reference to the High Court--- |
Jurisdiction of High Court under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990----Nature and scope---High Court, under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, was under obligation to answer questions of law raised in a reference before it and to deliver judgment while specifying the Read More... |
2019 PTD 606 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YOUSAF VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LYALLPUR ZONE), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 | Sales Tax Rules, 2006, S. 2(37), 11 & 21(2) | R. 12 Notification SRO No.555(I/2006 dated 05-06-2006 | Coercive recovery of tax/ extortion /Proceedings for blacklisting |
Taxpayer was issued show-cause notice for tax deficit----During pendency of proceedings on show cause, authorities issued warning to suspend registration of taxpayer and taxpayer paid sum of Rs.4.8 million as recovered amount----Taxpayer had neither admitted Read More... |
2019 PTD 577 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YOUSAF VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LYALLPUR ZONE), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 S. 11 | Coercive recovery from taxpayer under threat of suspension |
Recovery of taxes from a taxpayer without due process of adjudication of case, which is his basic, fundamental, constitutional and natural right cannot be equated with confession or admission of charges itself as same has to be adjudged upon---Coercive recovery from Read More... |
2019 PTD 577 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS MUHAMMAD YOUSAF VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LYALLPUR ZONE), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 2(37),11,11(2),11(3),21(2) | Two independent proceedings |
Suspension of registration and recovery of sales tax----Two independent proceedings under S.21(2) & S.11 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 cannot be initiated simultaneously with a single show-cause notice i.e. suspension of registration and recovery of sales Read More... |
2019 PTD 577 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
INDUS LYALLPUR LTD. & ANOTHER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Sales tax; Civil Procedure Code 1908 S. 114 & O. XLVII, R. 1 | Filing of Appeal/High Court Orders |
Entitlement of zero rating of sales tax in terms of SRO No. 1125(I)/2011, dated 31.12.2011----Scope---Review----Mere filing of a review petition before the Supreme Court did not create any right in favour of dept./party filing the same and could restrain the High Read More... |
2019 PTD 760 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
ABDUL GHANI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 74, 45-B & 46 Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, S. 3(3) & proviso | Intra-court appeal---Order passed under S. 74 |
Sales tax--Intra-court appeal---Order passed under S. 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for condonation of time-limit- Maintainability of intra-court appeal against such order--Scope- Question before the High Court was whether intra-court appeal against an order passed Read More... |
2019 PTD 764 (2019)120 TAX 216 2021 PTCL 240 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
ABDUL GHANI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 74, 11(5) | Exercise of powers under S. 74/past and closed transaction |
Assessment of sales tax- Assessment of Tax and Recovery of Tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded Condonation of time-limit after expiry of limitation period for making assessment for recovery of tax short-levied--Nature of statutory limitation Read More... |
2019 PTD 764 (2019)120 TAX 216 2021 PTCL 240 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
MESSRS APPLE PAPER PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH DIRECTOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 40 & 38 | Access to premises of registered person---Search under warrant |
Access to premises of registered person---Search under warrant--Exercise of powers under Ss. 38 & 40 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990-Limits to jurisdiction of officers under S. 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990-Obtaining of custody of records / documents of registered Read More... |
2019 PTD 787 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
MESSRS AMRELI STEEL LTD., KARACHI VS THE COMMISSIONER (IR), LTU, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45 | Payment of sales tax/Steel melters, re-rollers and ship breakers |
Payment of sales tax---Steel melters, re-rollers and ship breakers---Procedure---Taxpayer was in business of manufacturing steel reinforcement bars by running a re-rolling mill and was aggrieved of recovery of sales tax on basis of consumption of electricity Read More... |
2019 PTD 792 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2019 |
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 47 & 46 | Jurisdiction of High Court/ Tribunal remanding |
Jurisdiction of High Court under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Notice---Question of law-Scope-Order for remand by Appellate Tribunal--Scope- Order by Appellate Tribunal remanding a matter by observing that certain facts had not been determined by the forum Read More... |
2019 PTD 884 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2019 |
M/S. FATHER & SONS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONEV, CRTO, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 8, 11(2) & 34 Sixth Schedule, Serials Nos.10 & 104 | Taxpayer Claimed exemption for sales tax output tax on supplies |
Taxpayer Claimed exemption for sales tax output tax on supplies of “Ispaghol Husk”----Said claim of taxpayer was denied by adjudicating authority holding that claimed exemption related to agriculture produce of Pakistan, not subjected to further process Read More... |
2019 PTD 886 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/S. KARSAZ (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, E & C, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 11, 25, 37 & 38 | Assessment of tax----Self-assessed tax |
Procedure---Show cause notice--Preconditions---Proceedings under S..11 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 can only be initiated through process of audit under S.25 of Sales Tax Act, 1990----Self-assessed amount of tax due by taxpayer in its sales tax returns can only be altered Read More... |
2019 PTD 939 (2019)120 TAX 50 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
M/S. KARSAZ (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, E & C, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 11, 25, 33 & 34 | Assessment of tax/ Self-assessed tax/ delegation of powers |
Assessment of tax----Self-assessed tax----Selection of tax payer----Show-cause notice, non-issuance of—Delegation of powers----Principles----Taxpayer was aggrieved of show-cause notice issued under S.11(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 for recovery of additional tax Read More... |
2019 PTD 939 (2019)120 TAX 50 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2019 |
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI VS MESSRS SITARA ENERGY LTD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3, 10, 11, 33 & 34 | Sales Tax----Short payment----Surcharge and penalty |
Retrospective effect--Jurisdiction---Taxpayer was aggrieved of notice issued by authorities for recovery of deficient sales tax--- Appellate authority decided matter in favour of taxpayer on ground that reduction in rate of sales tax was beneficial which was Read More... |
2019 PTD 1024 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SPINZER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND ANOTHER
VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, PESHAWAR AND 5 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 3, 13, 8, 2(41), 2(37) & Sixth Sched., Entry 21 Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2007, R. 2 | Printing and supply of books to Provincial Textbook Board/ Input tax claim against exempt supplies |
Question before the High Court related to the applicability of sales tax upon printing and subsequent supply of textbooks to Provincial Textbook Board; and whether Provincial Textbook Board was required to withhold sales tax in such transactions----Held, that in Read More... |
2018 PTD 2121 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
OFFICE WORLD VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, R.T.O.-II, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 48 | Recovery of disputed tax/Taxpayer was granted conditional stay |
Taxpayer was granted conditional stay by Commissioner-IR (Appeals) (CIR(A)) subject to payment of 10% outstanding demand. |
2018 PTD 2170 (2018)118 TAX 187 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS INBOX BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. THROUGH CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 10A Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 12(a)(i) | Right to a fair hearing and trial |
Right to a fair hearing and trial necessitated that no one should be penalized by the decision upsetting and afflicting his right or legitimate expectation unless he was given prior notice of the case, a fair chance to answer it and a fair opportunity to Read More... |
2018 PTD 621 (2019) 119 TAX 309 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS INBOX BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. THROUGH CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
VS PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 12(a)(i) | evasion of tax and tax fraud/suspension of registration |
Power of Commissioner to suspend registration ‘without prior notice’ after satisfaction that person had issued fake invoices, evaded tax or committed tax fraud [Rule 12(a)(i) of Sales Tax Rules, 2006]---Scope---Word ‘without prior notice’ had Read More... |
2018 PTD 621 (2019) 119 TAX 309 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS SHAH SONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 7, 8(1)(a) & 73 | Taxpayer allegedly adjusted input tax on the goods which were not used for taxable supply |
Taxpayer allegedly adjusted input tax on the goods which were not used for taxable supply, this violating provisions of Ss.7, 8(1)(a) & 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Taxpayer on the basis of said allegation was called upon to show-cause as to why the evaded Read More... |
2018 PTD 717 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS ASHRAF FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS, PESHAWAR
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, REVENUE DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3(1A) Notifications SRO No.510(I)/2013 dated 12-06-2013---S.R.O. No.638(I)/ 2013 dated 09-07-2013 | Extra sales tax on billed amount/Electricity and Suit gas bills |
Petitioners were flour mills and aggrieved of levy of extra tax at the rate of 5% of total electricity and gas billed amount. |
2018 PTD 763 (2018)118 TAX 527 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SHV ENERGY PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.2(39), 3 & 13 | Levy and recovery of sales tax |
In order to attract levy and charge of sales tax under Sales Tax Act, 1990, transfer of right to dispose of goods as an owner was essential to constitute ‘taxable supply’ in the context of S.3 of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Question of entitlement in respect Read More... |
2018 PTD 767 (2018)118 TAX 500 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS SHV ENERGY PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.2(39), 3, 13 & 47 | Taxable supply/ Adjustment of input tax from output tax |
Applicant companies were engaged in purchase of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) from oil exploration and production companies and then sell the Gas in cylinders of various capacities to distributors---Cylinders were supplied to distributors against refundable security Read More... |
2018 PTD 767 (2018)118 TAX 500 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX
OFFICE, FAISALABAD
VS MESSRS MASHA ALLAH PAPER BOARD MILLS, FAISALABAD AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 47 | Reference/Finding of facts/ Jurisdiction of High Court |
Order assailed before High Court was with regard to findings of Appellant Tribunal on facts. |
2018 PTD 775 (2018)118 TAX 292 2018 PTCL 818 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
PAK ELEKTRON LIMITED & ANOTHER
VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 131 & Sixth Schedule | Grant of exemption is a delegated power of Federal Government |
Grant of exemption is a delegated power of Federal Government and Federal Government may prescribe conditions subject to which exemptions are granted---Primary purpose of grant of exemptions is in respect of supply of goods or import of goods specified in Sixth Read More... |
2018 PTD 778 (2018)118 TAX 541 2018 PTCL 59 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
PAK ELEKTRON LIMITED & ANOTHER
VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 2(11), 13 & Sixth Schedule, Table 2 Sr. No.12 [as amended by Finance Act (XVII of 2012) | Supplies against international tender/ Exemption on duty |
Retrospective effect---Scope---Petitioner company contended that contracts in question be dealt with in manner provided in Sales Tax Act, 1990 prior to promulgation of Finance Act, 2012. |
2018 PTD 778 (2018)118 TAX 541 2018 PTCL 59 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
MESSRS AYAN BATTERY TRADERS, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R. (CHENAB ZONE), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.21(2) Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.12 S.R.O. No.494(I)/2015, dated 30-6-2015 | Suspension of registration and blacklisting of registered person---Appellant/taxpayer, was alleged to be having no genuine business activities was inv |
Suspension of registration and blacklisting of registered person---Appellant/taxpayer, was alleged to be having no genuine business activities was involved in tax evasion and paper transaction with bogus units to avoid payment of sale tax---Commissioner Inland Read More... |
2018 PTD 787 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
MUHAMMAD ZESHAN
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Opportunity of hearing/disputed question of fact |
Disputed question of fact---Assessee was aggrieved of order passed by authorities on grounds that he was not provided opportunity of hearing. |
2018 PTD 790 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
ADDITIONAL, CIR, (LEGAL) ZONE-II, RTO, HYDERABAD
VS MESSRS WALLS PACKAGES, KOTRI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.7, 8, 11(2), 21(3), 33(ii), 36(1) & 46 | Input tax adjustment/Claim for |
Deputy Commissioner, Inland Revenue/Adjudicating Authority, vide order-in-original rejected claim of the taxpayer with regard to adjustment of input tax---Appellate authority, declared order-in-original as bad in law and without merits dismissed said Read More... |
2018 PTD 803 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
M/S. SHAHZAIB BROTHERS PAPER CONE (PVT.) LTD, FAISALABAD.
VS THE CIR (APPEALS), R.T.O., FAISALABAD. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 11, 33 & 34 S.R.O. No. 98(I)/2013, dated 14-2-2013 | failure to withholding sales tax |
Taxpayers, who was legally required to withhold 1/5th of his total input tax with regard to local purchases, did not withhold amount of withholding sales tax---Taxpayer was called upon to show as to why withholding sales tax, could not be recovered under S.11(2) of Read More... |
2018 PTD 850 2018 PTCL 391 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
M/S. SHAHZAIB BROTHERS PAPER CONE (PVT.) LTD, FAISALABAD.
VS THE CIR (APPEALS), R.T.O., FAISALABAD. |
Interpretation of statutes | Retrospectivity |
Retrospectivity, even in a procedural law was to be avoided, if it would affect an existing right or otherwise caused inconvenience or injustice to anybody---In absence of clear intention of the legislature to apply a provision of statute with retrospective effect, Read More... |
2018 PTD 850 2018 PTCL 391 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
M/S. K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD. VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD. PRESENT: |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 36 & 46 | Refund of input tax/ Recovery of already refunded amount of sales tax |
Taxpayer had received refund of input tax on the strength of invoices issue by an Undertaking whose registration was suspended---Based on said omission/irregularities, adjudication proceedings were initiated by Taxation Officer by way of issuance of a show-cause Read More... |
2018 PTD 854 2017 PTCL 207 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
M/S. K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD. VS THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD. PRESENT: |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.7, 8, 10, 11, 25, 36 & 46 Constitution of Pakistan, Art.13 | Issuance of second show-cause notice |
Issuance of second show-cause notice regarding the same tax periods, would amount to imposition of double taxation and double jeopardy which could not be given legal credence, but also would offend and defy the Fundamental Rights set out in Art.13 of Constitution, Read More... |
2018 PTD 854 2017 PTCL 207 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. MADINA WEAVING, FAISALABAD
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 11, 45-B & 46 SRO No.283(I)/2011, dated 1-4-2011---S.R.O. No.1058(I)/2011, dated 23-11-2011 SRO No.1125(I)/2011, dated 31-12-2011 | Zero rating |
Taxpayer, did not charge/pay tax on supply made to unregistered persons in accordance with SRO No.283(I)/2011, dated 1-4-2011---Concerned Officer, noted that such facility of zero rating was available, if the unregistered persons had paid tax at 6% of the value of Read More... |
2018 PTD 892 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. MADINA WEAVING, FAISALABAD
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 11, 45-B & 46 SRO No.283(I)/2011, dated 1-4-2011 S.R.O. No.1058(I)/2011, dated 23-11-2011 SRO No.1125(I)/2011, dated 31-12-2011 | Zero rating/ Failure to charge/pay tax on supply by taxpayer |
Failure to charge/pay tax on supply by taxpayer (a Weaving Mill) to unregistered persons---Taxpayers had failed to deduct/deposit sales tax against the supplies made to unregistered persons (during the tax period 7/2011 to 12/2011) in accordance with S.3 of the Read More... |
2018 PTD 892 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. MADINA WEAVING, FAISALABAD
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 11, 45-B & 46 S.R.O. No. 283(I)/2011, dated 1-4-2011 | Zero rating/ Failure to charge/pay tax on supply by taxpayer |
Failure to charge/pay tax on supply by taxpayer to unregistered person---Tax period involved in the present case, pertained, to July 2011 to October 2011, which fell under the ambit of SRO No. 283(I)/2011, dated 1-4-2011---Clause ‘V’ of said SRO released Read More... |
2018 PTD 892 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SAJID BASHIR WEAVING FACTORY, GOJRA VS C.I.R. (APPEALS), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Preamble | documentary evidence at a subsequent stage |
Failure to submit documentary evidence at the initial stages of adjudication---Neither the Sales Tax Act, 1990 contain any express provision debarring a taxpayer from submitting any documentary evidence at a subsequent stage nor there is any provision in the Sales Read More... |
2018 PTD 905 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/S. AL-REHMAN PACKAGES, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 11(3) & 73 | Adjustment of input tax/ Recovery of already adjusted amount of sales tax |
Scrutiny of sales tax returns, revealed that taxpayer had purportedly adjusted input tax for relevant period on the strength of invoices issued by the supplier, whose registration was allegedly suspended subsequently---Adjudication proceedings were initiated by the Read More... |
2018 PTD 915 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD
VS M/S. AL-ZAMIN TEXTILE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 8(1)(ca) & 21(3) | Refund or adjustment of input tax (tax credit) |
Zero rated supplies made to blacklisted units---Burden of proof-Respondent taxpayer claimed refund of a certain amount--- Taxpayer was served with a show cause notice alleging therein that taxpayer claimed refund against invoices of units that were Read More... |
2018 PTD 986 (2018)118 TAX 494 2018 PTCL 801 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/S IMRAN ALI LUBRICANTS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 12 Sales Tax Act 1990 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 10-A & 18---Vires of R.12, Sales Tax Rules, 2006 S. 21(2) | Blacklisting and suspension of registration/Commissioner Satisfaction. |
Blacklisting and suspension of registration of a registered person--- Power of Commissioner to suspend registration without prior notice [Rule 12 of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006]---Constitutionality- Commissioner could exercise such power under R. 12 if he was Read More... |
2018 PTD 1042 (2019)119 TAX 130 2018 PTCL 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/S IMRAN ALI LUBRICANTS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Administration of justice | Natural justice and fairness |
In all proceedings whether judicial or administrative, the principles of natural justice had to be observed if the proceedings might result in consequences affecting the person or property or other right of the parties concerned---Where a person was empowered to Read More... |
2018 PTD 1042 (2019)119 TAX 130 2018 PTCL 570 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/S HAMZA NASIR WIRE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ETC. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 11, 30 & 31 | Power to issue such notices was only conferred upon Chief Commissioner and Commissioner Inland Revenue |
Taxpayers had assailed notices issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue---Plea raised by petitioners was that power to issue such notices was only conferred upon Chief Commissioner and Commissioner Inland Revenue. |
2018 PTD 1071 (2018)117 TAX 311 2018 PTCL 182 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. ABDULLAH ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD VS THE C.I.R. (A), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.11(2)(3), 33(a), 34 & 46 | Input tax adjustment/Recovery of adjusted input tax |
Taxpayer had adjusted input tax during relevant financial year---Based on said omission and irregularity, adjudicating proceedings initiated by issuance of show-cause notice under S.11(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for recovery of adjusted amount of input tax, Read More... |
2018 PTD 1082 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
THE TAXATION OFFICER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX, LAHORE VS MESSRS RUPAFIL LTD. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 57 & 46 | Rectification of error or mistake/Jurisdiction of Appellate Tribunal |
Appellate Tribunal had inherent jurisdiction to rectify the error/mistake---Error/mistake floating on the surface of order, was not at all restricted to clerical error or arithmetical mistake, instead all types of errors; whether factual/legal or substantive or Read More... |
2018 PTD 1134 2018 PTCL 730 2018 SCMR 1131 (2019)119 TAX 392 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2000 Rr. 7, 8 & 9 | Refund claim not found genuine and thus inadmissible/ Limitation |
If any refund claim or part thereof was found non-genuine and not admissible under the law, a notice would be served on the claimant requiring him to show cause in writing within fourteen days; as to why his claim or part thereof should not be rejected and claimant Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 45 | Power of adjudication/ monetary limit/ coram non judice |
Issue, in the present case, was whether Deputy Collector and Assistant Collector, could issue show-cause notice/pass order-in-original in excess of their monetary limit expressed in S.45 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Amount of refund involved in the case being Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.11(2)(4) & 45-B(2) | Failure to pay tax due/Making assessment of sales tax actually payable |
Making assessment of sales tax actually payable---Issuance of show-cause notice---Limitation---Show-cause notice by the Deputy Collector of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and order under subsection (2) of S.11 of the Sales Tax was issued on 3-7-2006 under subsection (4) of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3(3)(a), 4, 26 & 73 | Scope of sales tax/Zero rating/Liability to pay tax |
Liability to pay tax of the person making supply would be in the case of supply of goods in Pakistan---Tax collected from the buyer by the seller in the capacity of agent of FBR, had to be deposited in the exchequer by him along with monthly sales tax return Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 10, 22, 23, 26 & 73 Ss. 10, 22, 23, 26 & 73 Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2000, R.9 | Claimed refund/Duty of exporter to submit supportive documents with Collector |
For refund under S.10 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, exporter had to submit with Collectorate, supportive documents prescribed in R.9 of Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2000---In the present case, appellant was holding taxable invoices issued by the suppliers as per S.23 of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MAYFAIR IMPEX, KARACHI
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS) |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 67---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.4 & 25 | Payment of refund/Discrimination |
Department in the cases similar to the appellant had paid refund inclusive of additional amount under S.67 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, in spite of the fact that their suppliers were suspected/blacklisted by the Collector Headquarter, and charge of tax fraud under Read More... |
2018 PTD 1131 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS KHAN AND COMPANY, SWAT
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Rules, 2006 R. 4 | Registration of taxpayer/Discrepancies of non-payment of sales tax |
Discrepancies of non-payment of sales tax for the relevant years on supply of coal having been observed, appellants were confronted through show-cause notice; against which explanation tendered by the appellants was treated as unsatisfactory---Assessing Officer Read More... |
2018 PTD 1158 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS KHAN AND COMPANY, SWAT
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 65 | Exemption of sales tax not levied or short levied |
Exemption of sales tax under S. 65 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, would be available to taxpayer subject to fulfilment of three conditions mentioned as (a)(b)(c); and all such conditions were apply collectively---Appellant had obtained coal mines on lease in tribal Read More... |
2018 PTD 1158 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, (ZONE-III), LTU,
ISLAMABAD
VS MESSRS PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 6, 7, 8, 26 & 45-B (3) | Sales tax and federal excise duty/ Claim for input tax adjustment |
Registered person claimed input tax adjustment on the basis of supplies, which had not been reconciled with the sales tax returns filed by the suppliers---Adjudicating authority passed order-in-original for recovery of sales tax along with default surcharge and Read More... |
2018 PTD 1244 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
MR. JUSTICE SHAMS MEHMOOD MIRZA.
VS FBR ETC. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 11, 30 & 31 | Notice of recovery/ Power to issue |
Taxpayers had assailed notices issued by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue---Plea raised by petitioners was that no such power was conferred upon Deputy Commissioner-IR to issue such notices---Validity---FBR intended such powers to be exercised by Commissioner of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1251 2018 PTCL 199 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS MALIK TRADERS, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 10, 11, 33, 34 & 66. SRO No. 555(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 | Refund claims of sales tax |
Appellant/registered person, being wholesaler, filed refund claims to sales tax for relevant periods; against which certain objections were raised by the Computerized Risk Based Data---Adjudication proceedings, culminated in sales tax order-in-original, whereby Read More... |
2018 PTD 1256 (2018)118 TAX 1 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
ZEESHAN MAJEED
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 7, 8 & 11---SRO No. 480(I)/ 2007 | Assessment of tax/ Issuance of show-cause notice- |
Conditions/situations mentioned in show-cause under S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990; that the registered person had failed to file the returns; that the registered person had not paid the tax due on supplies or made short payment or had claimed input tax credit or Read More... |
2018 PTD 1289 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
MESSRS USMAN ENGINEERING SERVICES
VS C.I.R., R.T.O.-II, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 21 & 26 | Failure to file monthly sales tax returns/De-registration |
Appellant/registered person, along with 1197 other registered persons who were non-filers of sales tax returns, were required to file returns on monthly basis under S.26(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which they failed ---Sales Tax registration of all registered Read More... |
2018 PTD 1315 (2018)118 TAX 8 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. AL-RAHEEM TEXTILE PROCESSING, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R., LYALLPUR ZONE, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3(3)(a), 8(1)(a), 25 & 73 | Input tax credit, disallowed, under the garb of S.73 was allowed by the Tribunal |
Case of appellant/registered person was selected for audit proceedings, which were accordingly completed vide order-in-original by Deputy Commissioner (DCIR)---Appellant being aggrieved, assailed assessment made by DCIR before the Commissioner (Appeals) Read More... |
2018 PTD 1436 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. FARAZ FOOD (PVT.) LTD., GUJRANWALA
VS C.I.R., R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 8-B, 11(2), 33, 34 & 46 | Adjustment of input tax/Procedural lapse/Imposition of penalty |
Appellant/registered person, who was required to claim input tax adjustment at ninety percent of output tax, had adjusted hundred percent input tax---Registered person under subsection (2) of S.8-B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, was allowed to adjust or claim refund of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1458 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3, 7, 11 & 36 | Fixed assets---Non-payment of sales tax on disposal of fixed assets |
Appellant company, contended that the department’s assertion regarding non-charging of sales tax on disposal of fixed assets was contrary to the facts, and the company had properly charged and deposited the sales tax---Appellant company, in support of said Read More... |
2018 PTD 1522 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3, 4 , 7, 11 & 36, | Non charging of sales tax on transportation charges |
Sales tax was chargeable on value of supply and not on the value of services, which was a domain of the Provinces----If the transportation charges were added as a value of supply in the value of condensate, which was chargeable at the rate of zero percent, resultant Read More... |
2018 PTD 1522 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3, 4 , 7, 11 & 36, | Activity of “providing gas connection†and “supplying gas |
Activity of “providing gas connection” and “supplying gas” were separate processes “Service charges” was a medium for supply of gas and it could not be termed as value of supply of gas and it could not be termed as value of supply Read More... |
2018 PTD 1522 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3, 4 , 7, 11 & 36, | Input Sales Tax against Unaccounted for Gas (UFG) line losses/ OGRA allows UFG to the company at 7% |
Non-admissibility of Input Sales Tax against Unaccounted for Gas (UFG) line losses---Appellant/taxpayer company incurred line losses/UFG line losses---Appellant/taxpayer company incurred line losses/UFG to the extent of 7.9% for the year under reference and Gas Read More... |
2018 PTD 1522 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 33, 34 & 34-A | Default surcharge and penalty/mala fide |
Default surcharge and penalty/mala Read More... |
2018 PTD 1522 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI
VS PAKISTAN BEVERAGES LIMITED, KARACHI |
Administrative law | Discretionary power/ exercise of |
Law recognizes no such thing as an unfettered discretion---All discretionary powers, especially that as conferred by statute, must be exercised in terms of well-established principles of administrative law, which were of longstanding authority ad had been developed, Read More... |
2018 PTD 1559 (2019)119 TAX 11 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI
VS PAKISTAN BEVERAGES LIMITED, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 40B |
Question as to whether such posting was time bound---Power under S.40B of the Sales Tax, 1990 had been granted to “monitor” the “production, sale of taxable goods and stock positions” of a registered person or class of such persons, by Read More... |
2018 PTD 1559 (2019)119 TAX 11 |
||
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2018 |
KH. ZAFAR IQBAL, DISTRIBUTOR LEVER BROTHERS PAKISTAN
LIMITED RAWALAKOT (A.K.) AND OTHERS
VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, RAWALAKOT AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 33 & 34 | Offences and penalties/Default surcharge/additional tax/Imposition of penalty |
Before imposition of penalty under Ss.33 & 34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990; the Department must be satisfied that defaulting party/taxpayer acted deliberately in defiance of the law or was guilty of contumacious or dishonest conduct or acted in conscious disregard Read More... |
2018 PTD 1574 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2018 |
KH. ZAFAR IQBAL, DISTRIBUTOR LEVER BROTHERS PAKISTAN
LIMITED RAWALAKOT (A.K.) AND OTHERS
VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, RAWALAKOT AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 33 & 34 | Offences and penalties/Default surcharge/additional tax/Imposition of penalty |
Assessment of Tax and Recovery of Tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Mandatory nature of Departmental obligations under S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Section 11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 was mandatory in nature and any order passed Read More... |
2018 PTD 1574 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
MESSRS AL-ZARINA GLASS INDUSTRIES VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3 (IA), 13 & Sixth Sched., item 29C. Notification SRO No.509(I)/2013, dated 12-6-2013 | Exemption from sales tax---Registration of sales tax |
Petitioners were glass bangles manufacturers and they were aggrieved of recovery of extra 5% in electricity and gas bills on the ground that they had not obtained sales tax registration number. |
2018 PTD 1600 2019 PTCL 177 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
ALMOIZ INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANOTHER
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 71 & 3 SRO No. 421(I)/2014 dated 04.06.2014 Constitution of Pakistan Arts. 18 & 25 | Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, Rr.58H, 58H(a), 58H(b) 58M(c)/Notification ultra vire |
Special procedure for payment of sales tax by steel melters, re-rollers and ship breakers---Principles for collection of sales tax on supplies, class of supplies, and class of goods---power of FBR to prescribe special procedure for scope of and payment of sales Read More... |
2018 PTD 1633 (2019)119 TAX 106 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2018 |
AGRO PACK VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.4. Notification SRO No. 190 (I) 2002 dated 2-4-2002 | Refund of sales tax/ Zero rating, principle of |
Question was with regard to supply of goods manufactured by petitioner to Afghanistan and applicability of Notification SRO No.190(I)/2002, dated 2-4-2002---Provision of S.4 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, was the parent law and provided for Zero Rate of sales tax on goods Read More... |
2018 PTD 1729 |
|
Supreme Court (AJ&K) | 2018 |
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX
VS MANGLA METALS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/PRLNCIPLE OFFICER, MIRPUR |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 31, 32, 47 & 71 | Powers of officers of Inland Revenue/sales tax department----Delegation of powers- |
Adjudication by officers of the Department---Adjudication by High Court under the Sales Tax Act, 1990 vis-a-vis delegation of powers under the Sales Tax Act. 1990---Scope---Officer(s) of the Sales Tax Department could exercise all powers and discharge all duties Read More... |
2018 PTD 1922 (2019)119 TAX 204 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
SHAMIMUDDIN AHMED AND 2 OTHERS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 11(3), 11(2) & 3. | Recovery of sales tax/ Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded. |
Recovery of sales tax. Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded. Taxpayer impugned issuance of show-cause notice under Ss. 11(2) & 11(3) of the Sales Tax Act, , 1990 on the ground inter alia, that the proposed Read More... |
2018 PTD 2112 2019 PTCL 282 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
ARMY WELFARE TRUST (NIZAMPUR CEMENT PROJECT), RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (NOW COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE), PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 3B(1), 13, 13(1), 46, 47, 47(5) | Jurisdiction of the High Court |
Reference/appeal (erstwhile) to the High Court against order of Appellate Tribunal---Scope---Jurisdiction of the High Court under S. 47(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, was restricted to matters involving only question of law---Reference or appeal (erstwhile) to the Read More... |
2017 PTD 470 (2017)116 TAX 20 2017 SCMR 9 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
ARMY WELFARE TRUST (NIZAMPUR CEMENT PROJECT), RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (NOW COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE), PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- Ss. 3B (1), 13(1) & 47(5)---S.R.O. No. 561(I)/94 dated 9th June, 1994 | Sales tax collection |
Sales Tax, Collection of---Cement manufacturer exempted from sales tax---Question as to whether the manufacturer had collected sales tax on supplies made by it---Such question was a question of fact which could not be decided by the High Court in a reference filed Read More... |
2017 PTD 470 (2017)116 TAX 20 2017 SCMR 9 |
|
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan | 2017 |
M/s Pak Gen Power Ltd.
VS The Commissioner Inland Revenue, etc. |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 8(2), 2(33), 2(41), 2(39), 2(46) Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007, 13(3) Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 24 | Power purchase agreement |
Power purchase agreement---Capacity Purchase Price---Nature---Tax credit not allowed---Taxable and non-taxable supplies---Special procedure for collection and payment of sales tax on electric power---Interpretation of R. 13(3) of the Sales Tax Special Procedure Read More... |
2017 PTD 495 (2017)115 TAX 128 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
NAZIR AHMAD VS THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 74 & 45---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 24-A | Complaint against initiation of proceedings under Ss. 161 & 205 |
Adjudication of claims by Sales Tax authorities---Statutory limitation---Condonation---“Speaking order”---Scope---Petitioner/taxpayer impugned order of Commissioner Inland Revenue, whereby its claim for refund was denied on ground that Read More... |
2017 PTD 1402 118 TAX 17 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
ORI-TECH-OILS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CEO VS MANAGER REGISTRATION, CENTRAL REGISTRATION OFFICE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 2(17), 2(16), 2(41) & 15---Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 5 | Application for registration; Toll; manufacturing; as per S.2(41) |
Constitution petition---Application for registration---Definition of manufacturer / producer for purpose(s) of Sales Tax Registration and taxable supplies---Toll manufacturing arrangement---Scope---Petitioner taxpayer had applied for sales tax registration as a Read More... |
2017 PTD 1497 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
ORI-TECH-OILS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CEO VS MANAGER REGISTRATION, CENTRAL REGISTRATION OFFICE AND 3 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statues | Taxation law |
Taxation law---Definition clause of the statute---Construction---Scope---Definition clause provided a foundational basis while construing provisions of law and reference to ordinary dictionary meaning of a word was to be avoided in presence of such definition Read More... |
2017 PTD 1497 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, LAHORE VS M/S. FLYING BOARD AND PAPER PRODUCTS, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 7, 8, 11, 36, 46 | Adjustment of input tax |
Illegal adjustment of input tax---Deputy Collector, came to know that registered person, during relevant period had taken an illegal adjustment of input tax against fixed sales tax payable on the goods manufactured and cleared by registered person under the capacity Read More... |
2017 PTD 1536 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS ADEEL BROTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 33 & 47 | Penalty |
Reference---Penalty---Reduction in quantum of penalty imposed upon taxpayer under S.33 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Quantum of the penalty imposed on taxpayer for non-filing of Sales Tax Return, was Read More... |
2017 PTD 1579 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS MESSRS ADEEL BROTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 47 | Findings of fact |
Reference to High Court---Scope and nature---High Court was to decide on a Reference under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 on facts and circumstances founded by the Appellate Tribunal which was the last fact finding forum and High Court could not change such Read More... |
2017 PTD 1579 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(!) Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance of 2000--- S.3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 160---Vires of provisions of Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance, 2000---Levy of tax---Province, power of---National Finance Commission (NFC) Award---Object, scope and Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance (VIII of 2000) 3 | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(g) Interpretation of Constitution--- Exception---Scope---“Exception” has to be given proper meaning and effect---To impute redundancy to even a statutory provision or to so interpret a statute that a part of it is rendered futile or Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(i) Constitution of Pakistan---- Art. 70 (4), Fourth Schedule, Federal Legislative List, entry 49 [as amended by S. 101 of Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act (X of 2010)]---Exception---Scope---Exception added to entry No. 49 of Federal Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, GUJRANWALA AND OTHERS VS MESSRS SUPER ASIA MOHAMMAD DIN AND SONS AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Mandatory /directory /provision |
Mandatory/directory/provision, determination of--- Test--- Word “shall” used in a provision of law---Scope---Word ‘shall’ was to be construed in its ordinary grammatical meaning and normally the use of word ‘shall’ by the legislature branded a provision Read More... |
2017 PTD 1756 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, GUJRANWALA AND OTHERS VS MESSRS SUPER ASIA MOHAMMAD DIN AND SONS AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 11(4) first proviso [erstwhile], 36(3), first proviso [erstwhile], 11(5) & 74 | Show cause notice |
---Sales tax, recovery of---Show cause notice---Adjudication proceedings---Order-in-original---Limitation period---Question as to whether the limitation period contained in the First provisos to the erstwhile Ss. 11(4) & 36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and the Read More... |
2017 PTD 1756 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, GUJRANWALA AND OTHERS VS MESSRS SUPER ASIA MOHAMMAD DIN AND SONS AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statues | Casus omissus |
Casus omissus, principle of---Scope---Principle of reading in or ‘casus omissus’ was not to be invoked lightly, rather it was to be used sparingly and only when the situation demanded it---Courts should refrain from supplying an omission in the statute because Read More... |
2017 PTD 1756 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, GUJRANWALA AND OTHERS VS MESSRS SUPER ASIA MOHAMMAD DIN AND SONS AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statues | Directory and mandatory |
Directory’ and ‘mandatory’ provisions---Scope---When a statute required that a thing should be done in a particular manner or form, it had to be done in such manner, but if such provision was directory, the act done in breach thereof would not be void, even Read More... |
2017 PTD 1756 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS M.A. INDUSTRIES 105 INDUSTRIAL, MULTAN VS C.I.R., R.T.O., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(14), (37), 3, 7, 8-A & 73 S.R.O. No. 555(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 | Tax fraud |
Tax fraud---Claim/adjustment of input tax---Appellant/registered person had claimed/adjusted input tax on strength of false/flying invoices issued by the blacklisted/suspended units---Show-cause notice was issued to the registered person, who could not substantiate Read More... |
2017 PTD 1836 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
F.M. TEXTILE MILLS & OTHERS VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE & OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 30, 30A, 30E, 32 & 2(18)---Federal Board of Revenue Act (IV of 2007), Ss. 3, 5 4(e), 4(i), 4(k)---FBR S.R.O. No. 116(I)/2015 dated 09.02.2015 | Powers and functions of the Federal Board of Revenue |
Powers and functions of the Federal Board of Revenue---Officer of Inland Revenue---Directorate General (Intelligence and Investigation), Inland Revenue---Powers and functions of the Directorate under the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Petitioners impugned S.R.O. No. Read More... |
2017 PTD 1875 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE VS IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LTD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 47 | Nature of Jurisdiction |
Reference / appeal to High Court---Nature of jurisdiction of High Court under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Question of law, determination of---Scope---Questions before the High Court involved the order of the Appellate Tribunal whereby proceedings against Read More... |
2017 PTD 2208 118 TAX 302 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S. LUCKY PLASTIC INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS |
Law of limitation | Limitation |
---Object and rationale for law for limitation---Law of limitation was founded on public policy and State interest and was vital for an orderly and organized society---Statutes of limitation were jurisprudential necessities because they achieved Read More... |
2017 PTD 2284 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS M/S. LUCKY PLASTIC INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 74 36(3) & 47 | Recovery of sales tax--- Limitation |
Recovery of sales tax---Adjudication---Limitation prescribed under s. 36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Condonation of time limit and exercise of power under S.74 of the Sales Tax Act 1990---Scope---Question before the High Court was “whether limitation provided Read More... |
2017 PTD 2284 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
PAK TELECOM MOBILE LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3(3B), 2(33), 2(41) & Ninth Sched.---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 & Entry No. 49 of Part I of the Forth Sched | Supply Sale and Transfer |
Sales Tax---Scope and levy of---Supply, Sale and Transfer---Concept---Cellular/telecommunication services---Supply of Subscriber Identification Module (SIM) Cards by Cellular Service Company--- Supply of SIM Cards by the company did not necessarily constitute Read More... |
2017 PTD 2296 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
PAK TELECOM MOBILE LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 2(33) & 2(41 | transfer of the right |
Expression “transfer of the right to dispose of goods as owner”---Meaning and connotation---Term “sale” and the words “other transfer of the Right to dispose of goods as owner” used in S. 2(33) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 were similar and had to be read Read More... |
2017 PTD 2296 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. KARACHI
VS THE I.A.C RANGE-III, COMPANIES-IV, KARACHI |
Wealth Tax Act 1963 [Since repealed] Ss. 2(e)(ii), 16(3), 23 & 17-B | Imposition of wealth tax |
Imposition of wealth tax---Assessee, a private limited company, engaged in the business of manufacturing and fabrication of machinery parts, due to temporary cessation of business activities, leased out portion of its plot of land on a monthly rent; and declared the Read More... |
2017 PTD 2316 (2017)115 TAX 1 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. KARACHI
VS THE I.A.C RANGE-III, COMPANIES-IV, KARACHI |
Wealth Tax Act 1963 [Since repealed] Ss 17-B | Revisional Jurisdiction of (I.A.C) |
Revisional jurisdiction of Inspecting Additional Commissioner (I.A.C.)---Scope and extent---Inspecting Additional Commissioner (I.A.C.), was not given free hand to invoke the provisions of S.17-B of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, in each and every assessment/order made Read More... |
2017 PTD 2316 (2017)115 TAX 1 |
|
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI | 2017 |
M/S. HABIB INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. KARACHI
VS THE I.A.C RANGE-III, COMPANIES-IV, KARACHI |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing Statute |
Taxing statute---Provisions of taxing statute, were strictly interpreted and the charges were imposed on the taxpayer with a clear and unambiguous language---Court/Tribunal should apply correct law, whether, litigants pointed out or not---If there were two Read More... |
2017 PTD 2316 (2017)115 TAX 1 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2017 |
UCH POWER (PVT.) LIMITED. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & 5 OTHERS. |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 34 | Default surcharge--- Willful default |
Levy of Sales Tax---Default surcharge---Willful default---Interpretation of S.34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Bare perusal of S.34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 revealed that payment of default surcharge was not confined only to cases of willful default but same could Read More... |
2017 PTD 2377 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTD VS CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 3, 2(33), 2(35) & 2(41) | Supply— Taxable activity |
“Supply”---Meaning of---Taxable activity---Taxable supply---Scope of sales tax---Question before the High Court was “whether placement of certain appliances at retail outlets by taxpayer for sale of its goods, constituted “supply” in terms of S.2(33) Read More... |
2017 PTD 2380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTD VS CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII 1990) Ss. 7, 8 & 3 | Tax credit not allowed |
Determination of sales tax liability---Tax credit not allowed---Deduction / adjustment of input tax for purpose of taxable supplies---“Purpose” of taxable supplies---Scope---Interpretation and nature of Ss. 7 & 8 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Question before Read More... |
2017 PTD 2380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTD VS CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS |
Words and phrases--- | Purpose |
---“Purpose”, meaning of---Purpose meant the intention or function of something, the thing that something was supposed Read More... |
2017 PTD 2380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LTD VS CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 33 & 34 | Stock in trade |
Offences and penalties under the Sales Tax 1990---Default surcharge / additional tax, imposition of---Mens rea for offences---Willful default / evasion of tax---Scope---Penalty could only be imposed where there was willful evasion of duties and taxes---For a Read More... |
2017 PTD 2380 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD VS M/S. CHAUDHRY SUGAR MILLS LTD., AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.7, 66, 33, 11 & 47 | Determination of sales tax liability |
Determination of sales tax liability---Input tad adjustment---Refund / adjustment under S.66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Remitting of penalty and additional tax---Scope---Questions before the High Court related input tax adjustment claimed under S. 66 of the Sales Read More... |
2017 PTD 2424 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAMA EXPORTS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R. (A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- S.11 | Show cause notice |
Show-cause notice---Scope, object and contents of a valid notice. Show-cause notice, was a foundational document, which was to describe the case comprehensively, made out against the taxpayer by invoking relevant provisions of law and by making references on Read More... |
2017 PTD 70 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAMA EXPORTS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R. (A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.2(14), 3, 10, 11, 46 & 73 | Input tax claim |
Input tax, claim for---Tax payer had transacted all payments to his suppliers through Banking channel, by complying with the mandatory provision if S,73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which was the sole obligation on the buyer to ensure veracity of transaction in Read More... |
2017 PTD 70 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD VS M/S. UNITED INDUSTRIES LIMITED, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 8, 3 & 47 | Taxable supply |
Scope of sales tax ---Taxable supply---Tax credit not allowed---Input tax adjustment---Question before the High Court was whether sales tax could be charged on sale of old vehicles and machinery which were not admissible for input tax deduction in terms of S. 8(1) Read More... |
2017 PTD 2447 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAMA EXPORTS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R. (A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S.11 | Shifting of liability |
Prime liability to pay sales tax---Scope---Shifting of liability---Scope---Prime liability to pay sales tax was on the supplier under S.3(3)(a) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990; same could be shifted to the buyer only be way of notification under S.3-A of the sales Tax Read More... |
2017 PTD 70 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAHID GUL VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER I.R. (AUDIT-III) Zone-I, INLAND REVENUE, RTO, PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss 2(25), 3, 6, 11, 14, 22, 23, 29 & 46---Sales Tax Rules, 2006, Rr.5, 6, 13(2) & 20(2)(b)---SRO 555(I)/2006 dated 5-6-2006---S.R.O. 480(I)/2007 dated 9-6-2007--- | Registration |
Failure to get registered under S.14, Sales Tax, Act, 1990---Department, during audit of appellants record, observed that, appellants who supplied natural gas, and were engaged in the business of the power generation (Electricity); and its subsequent sales/supplies, Read More... |
2017 PTD 2450 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SHAMA EXPORTS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R. (A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Retrospectivity |
Retrospectivity---Scope---Executive order and notification, which were detrimental or prejudicial to the interest of a person imposing liability or obligation, could not operate retrospectively---Executive order and notification which conferred a benefit or right, Read More... |
2017 PTD 70 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
THE STATE THROUGH COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS AHMED ALI KHAN |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss.33(5), 33(11) & 33(13) | Offences and penalties |
Offences and penalties---Failure to deposit tax amount---Issue or use a document which was forged or false---Tax fraud---Accused were charged with allegations that they were involved in charging sales tax on fake invoices and they were not depositing the same in the Read More... |
2017 PTD 107 (2017)116 TAX 60 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MIAN MEHMOOD-UR-RASHEED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ADDITIONAL SECRETARY AND MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.3 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.77 & 199 | Public interest litigation |
Tax to be levied by law only---Nature and effect of Art.77 of the Constitution---Public interest litigation---Petitioners, in public interest, impugned increase in prices of petroleum products, inter alia, on the ground that the Federal Government had encroached Read More... |
2017 PTD 2469 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
THE STATE THROUGH COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS AHMED ALI KHAN |
Criminal Procedure Code of 1898 S.412 | No appeal in a case when accused pleads guilty |
No appeal in a case when accused pleads guilty---Conviction was recorded on basis of confessional statement, law even ousted remedy of appeal as enshrined in S.412, Cr. Read More... |
2017 PTD 107 (2017)116 TAX 60 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- Ss. 11(3), 36 & 46 | Assessment of Tax |
Assessment of tax---Recovery of tax, not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Appellant/company was manufacture-cum-exporter and was engaged in making of zero-rated supplies of textiles and textile articles thereof---Department, while conducting post Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MALIK FAISAL IMRAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.45(2) | Annulled and setting aside |
Terms “Annulled and setting aside”---Applicability---Petitioner was taxpayer and his grievance was that when assessment order was annulled by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals), it had attained finality and Assessing Officer could not re-open the Read More... |
2017 PTD 2480 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(14), 2(14)(a), 2(44), 7, 8, 8-A, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 14, 21(3), 23, 25(3), 33, 33(11)(c), 34, 36, 45, 46, 73, 73(3) | De-registration blacklisting |
De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration---Transactions not admissible---Appellant/company, had transacted all payments to its supplier through Banking channel by complying with the mandatory provision of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which was sole Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- Ss. 11(3), 36 & 46 Ss.21(3), 46 & 73 | Input tax adjustment |
Input tax, adjustment of---Physical transfer of goods---Condition of physical transfer of goods, was nowhere expressly provided under Sales Tax Act, 1990, or the rules made thereunder, but its inference had been found available in S..2(14)(a) of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICER, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 47, 3 & 7 | Determination of sales tax liability |
Determination of sales tax liability---Jurisdiction of High Court under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Nature---Question before the High Court was whether the Appellate Tribunal and forum below were justified in holding that the taxpayer, an Electricity Supply Read More... |
2017 PTD 2488 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 14 & 23 | tax invoices |
Registration, tax invoices---Establishing genuineness and veracity of transactions---Sales tax liability was created against the appellant/buyer mainly on the ground that the purchases were made from the supplier, who was not traceable and genuine one---Adjudicating Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- S 8A | Suspecting Input tax invoices |
Suspecting the input tax invoices of supplier to buyer---Provisions of S.8-A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 simply required that the buyer should have the knowledge and reasonable grounds to suspect that the supplier would not deposit the sales tax in the national Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | statute would direct that certain acts |
When a statute would direct that certain acts would be done by a specified person, his performance by any other person, was impliedly Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | transgression of jurisdiction |
Any transgression of jurisdiction, not being a technical defect, would render entire exercise of authority to be illegal and void ab initio---When a particular Authority had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed with a case, any attempt by any other authority to take Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Notification, executive order and instruction |
Fiscal enactment---Notification, executive order and instruction, could be given retrospective effect, if it would go to benefit of taxpayer, but if it was detrimental or prejudicial to the interest of taxpayer imposing liability or obligation, would always operate Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- S 45 | Authorities and administration |
Duty of adjudicating and first appellate Authorities and administration of substantial justice---Adjudicating and First Appellate Authorities are duty bound to weigh conflicting evidences and to draw their own inference and conclusion in order to administer Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS KAMAL LIMITED, KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 33 & 34 | Additional demand of default surcharge |
Additional demand of default surcharge and imposition of penalty---Additional demand of default surcharge under S.34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and hundred percent penalty involved under S. 33(11)(c) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 was by all means a tax of punitive nature, Read More... |
2017 PTD 113 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
NEW ALLIED ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 3 7-A, 13, 71, & 2 (13)---Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, R. 58-B---S.R.O. 482(1), 2011, dated 03.06.2011---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 & 77 | Levy and collection of Tax |
Constitutional petition---Scope of tax---Levy and collection of tax on specified goods on value addition---Exemption---‘Importer’---Meaning and scope---Tax to be levied by law only---Payment of sales tax on account of minimum value addition---Collector of Read More... |
2017 PTD 130 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
NEW ALLIED ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION AND ANOTHER |
Constitution of Pakistan | Tax to be levied by law only |
Tax to be levied by law only---Scope---of tax---Levy and collection of tax on specified goods on value addition---Special procedure---Delegated legislation---Powers of Executive---Scope---Payment of sales tax on account of minimum value addition---Levy of tax plays Read More... |
2017 PTD 130 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2017 |
M/s CHILTAN GHEE MILLS, QUETTA etc.
VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (REFUND), CUSTOMS HOUSE, QUETTA and another |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 7, 8(1)(a) & 13 | Sales tax, refund/ Adjustment of input tax |
Sales tax, refund of---Scope---Adjustment of input tax could only be claimed in a situation where the goods that had been manufactured or produced fell within the definition of ‘taxable supplies’---Where the goods that were to be supplied were exempt from sales Read More... |
2017 PTD 138 (2016)114 TAX 521 2017 SCMR 2183 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX
VS MESSRS KHURSHID SPINNING MILLS LTD. AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of statutes | Jurisdiction |
Cognizance---Principle---Any forum cannot take cognizance of a matter beyond its pecuniary jurisdiction, prescribed in the relevant law---Inherent defect anno9t be cured to defeat the provisions of statutes or enactments affecting jurisdiction of a Read More... |
2017 PTD 196 (2017)115 TAX 451 2017 PTCL 73 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX
VS MESSRS KHURSHID SPINNING MILLS LTD. AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of Statues | Administration of Justice |
Prejudice---Scope---Order passed against a person by a forum against express provision of law on the subject, if allowed to stay intact, cause serious prejudice to legal right of Read More... |
2017 PTD 196 (2017)115 TAX 451 2017 PTCL 73 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX
VS MESSRS KHURSHID SPINNING MILLS LTD. AND ANOTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 47 | Pecuniary Jurisdiction |
---Reference---Pecuniary jurisdiction---Waiver or estoppel---Applicability---Scope—Show-cause notice---Taxpayer assailed show cause notice issued by authority beyond its pecuniary jurisdiction---Appellate authority accepted appeal filed by taxpayer and the order Read More... |
2017 PTD 196 (2017)115 TAX 451 2017 PTCL 73 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS N.H. PACKAGES, MANSOORABAD, FAISALABAD VS CIR (APPEALS), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 11(3), 33, 34, 36 & 46 | Assessment of Tax |
Assessment of tax---Recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Issuance of show-cause notice---Appellant/registered person, was registered as a manufacturer of plastic products making taxable supplies---Sales tax paid on its input goods was Read More... |
2017 PTD 211 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS N.H. PACKAGES, MANSOORABAD, FAISALABAD VS CIR (APPEALS), FAISALABAD AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 33 & 34 | Additional demand of default surcharge |
Additional demand of default surcharge and imposition of penalty---Additional demand of default surcharge, and hundred percent penalty of amount of tax, was by all means a tax of punitive nature and no penalty and default surcharge, could be imposed and adjudged Read More... |
2017 PTD 211 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 45-B, 46 | Power of appellate tribunal to grant stay to taxpayer |
Per: Muhammad Jawed Zakaria, Judicial Member; Muhammad Asif Accountant Member agreeing with most of the observation and pointing out another aspect of the matter. [Majority View].---Power of Appellate Tribunal to grant stay to taxpayer---Application Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Civil Procedure Code of 1908--- O. XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2 | Grant of Stay/injunction |
Grant of stay/injunction---Principles---Points/principles to be considered before grant of stay/injunction were discretionary relief, granting was purely within the discretion of the court subject to fetters/restrictions/limitations, expressly and clearly imposed by Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Language of the statute |
-If the language of the statute was clear and intelligible and did not admit of two meanings, effect must be given to the words used and thus the intention of the legislation must be carried Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- S.45-B | Appeal/ Principles |
Appeal---Principles---Appellate Authority dispensing with justice and exercising judicial powers, were supposed to apply its mind to the cases and to determine respective stances taken by the taxpayer and after giving opportunity to the department and further Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- Ss. 45-B, 46 & 48--- | Appeal before Appellate Authority |
Per Mohammed Asif Accountant Member agreeing with most of the observations of Muhammad Jawed Zikaria Judicial Member and pointing out another aspect of the matter. Appeal before Appellate Authority---Stay application, rejection Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
MESSRS K.B. ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD
VS CIR (APPEALS), RTO., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act of 1990--- Ss. 45-B, 46 & 48--- | Power of tribunal to grant stay to taxpayer |
Per Muhammad Waseem Chaudhary Judicial Member agreeing with Muhammad Jawed Zikaria, Judicial Member Power of the Tribunal to grant stay to taxpayer---To issue directions for stay of the recovery of tax, or to allow the recovery by rejecting Read More... |
2017 PTD 324 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. AYUB TEXTILE INDUSTRIES THROUGH PROPRIETOR
VS COMMISSIONER (COLLECTOR) OF SALES TAX, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD & 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 S. 47 General Clause Act 1897 S.24-A Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10-A | Jurisdiction of Appellate Tribunal |
Reference---Jurisdiction of Appellate Tribunal---Nature---High Court observed that Appellate Tribunal was vested with the jurisdiction to decide factual controversies and was a forum of last resort in that respect---Onorous obligation was cast on the Tribunal to Read More... |
2017 PTD 352 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
MESSRS FAISAL MOTORS VS MODEL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (EAST) AND OTHERS |
Import Policy, 2013 C1. 2(1) | New vehicle |
“New vehicle”---Connotation---Registered vehicle---Petitioner imported 2016 model car from Japan which was already registered there and was driven only 75 kilometers---Authorities declined to allow import of car in question allegedly for the reason that import Read More... |
2017 PTD 355 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2017 |
MESSRS SERVO MOTOR OIL (PVT.) LTD. MULTAN
VS C.I.R., SPECIAL ZONE, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act of 1990 Ss. 2(37), 11, 33, 34, 45-B & 46 | Extra tax and further tax |
Failure to charge/pay extra tax and further tax on the supplies made---Issuance of show-cause notice and order to deposit sales tax along with default surcharge---Registered person, having not charged/paid extra tax and further tax on the supplies made by him, Read More... |
2017 PTD 373 (2018)118 TAX 22 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
Messrs ALLIED STAINLESS INDUSTRIES. GUJRANWALA VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ---Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005) 2(37), 3, 11, 33, 34 & 46---S.3-A | Failure to pay tax on supplies and commission of tax fraud |
Failure to pay tax on supplies and commission of tax fraud---Recovery of sales tax with default surcharge and imposition of penalty---Appellant made huge sales during relevant period, but allegedly failed to pay sales tax as well as Special Excise Duty in violation Read More... |
2016 PTD 2173 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Kamalia Sugar Mills Ltd.
VS Customs Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal etc. |
Interpretation of Statues | Fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute---Exemption clause is to be construed strictly---In case of doubt or two interpretations, resolve should till towards chargeability, which is presupposed in case of an Read More... |
2016 PTD 2183 (2016)114 TAX 375 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Kamalia Sugar Mills Ltd.
VS Customs Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal etc. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(46), 3(1A) & 47---Notification No. SRO 208(I)/98, dated 31-3-1998 | Further Tax |
Further tax---Exemption---Jurisdiction of High Court---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had found that exemption under notification SRO 208(I)/98, dated 31-3-1998, did not include further tax levied under S. 3(1A) of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Validity---Levy and charge of Read More... |
2016 PTD 2183 (2016)114 TAX 375 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs SURAJ FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-VIII, R.T.O.-II, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 3, 7, 11(2), 13, 36(1) & 46--- --- | Assessment of tax |
Assessment of tax---Determination of tax liability---Recovery of tax not levied or short levied---Case as made out by the department was that registered person/company made in-house production of sulphuric acid, which was manufactured by a chemical reaction of Read More... |
2016 PTD 2154 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 199 | Show Cause notice |
Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Show cause notice---Mere notice or a show cause notice was not an adverse order; therefore, constitutional petition would not be competent; exception to said general rule was a grievance relating to the notice or show Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11 & 36 | Assessment of tax |
Assessment of tax or recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Delegation of powers conferred on Commissioner to subordinate officer---Scope---Competence of officer issuing the show cause notice---Show cause notice---Show cause notice Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Constitution of Pakistan 2(18), 11, 30, 30A to 30-E, 31 & 32--- ---Art. 199 | Assessment of tax or recovery |
Constitutional petition---Assessment of tax or recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Show cause notice---Competent authority---Determination---‘Officer Inland Revenue’---Scope---Powers/ delegation of Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Interpretation of statues | Administration of Justice |
Delegated powers/authority---Scope---Delegate cannot further delegate its powers unless expressly authorized under the law---In order to enable a person to delegate the powers or functions, there must be an authority, expressed or implied to delegate---Statutory Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Principle of Law | Void of order |
Void order---Effect---In case the basic order is void, then any superstructure built thereon was also illegal and liable to Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.
ZAVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED through Director, Islamabad VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman FBR, Islamabad and another |
Interpretation of statues | Redundancy, principle |
Redundancy, principle of---Scope---Redundancy cannot be attributed to the Legislature; every word used in a statute must be given its true meaning and the provisions construed together in a harmonious manner---Applying one provision of law in isolation from the Read More... |
2016 PTD 2332 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
GOLDEN SANITARY CERAMICS, GUJRANWALA VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Sales Tax Rules, 2006 2(37), 3, 11, 14, 33, 34, 36 & 46--- ---R.6---Notification No.SRO 555(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 | Failure to pay sales tax |
Failure to pay sales tax---Issuance of show-cause notice beyond time of limitation---Effect---Sales tax liability was adjudged under Ss.11(2) & 36(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, against appellant / registered person without providing him any opportunity of Read More... |
2016 PTD 2348 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2016 |
Messrs SMS COURIER (PVT.) LTD.
VS COLLECTOR (APPEALS) CUSTOMS and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) -----Ss. 25, 38 & 47 | Access to record, documents, etc.----Reference to High Court |
----Access to record, documents, etc.----Reference to High Court---Question before the High Court was “whether Superintendent Sales Tax was empowered to act as officer of Sales Tax Under S. 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 When he visited the taxpayer’s office and Read More... |
2016 PTD 1 2017 TAX 243 2016 PTCL 375 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 25 & 72-B | Audit; Summoning of record of documents |
Audit---Summoning of record of documents---Powers of Commissioner and Federal Board of Revenue---Scope---Provisions of S. 25 & S. 72-B of Sales Tax Act, 1990 are independent of each other---Commissioner is exclusively empowered to exercise powers within the Read More... |
2016 PTD 1484 (2017)115 TAX 27 2016 PTCL 302 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
PROTEK DEVICES, LAHORE VS C.I.R., ZONE-VI, R.T.O., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(37), 11(5), 36(1), 46 | Tax fraud; Inadmissible adjustment |
Tax fraud---Inadmissible adjustment of input tax---Officer concerned came to know that registered person claimed inadmissible adjustment of input tax for the tax period March 2009 to May 2009 on account of invoices issued by blacklisted unit, in contravention of Read More... |
2016 PTD 1662 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Constitution of Pakistan, 11 | Assessment of tax |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Show cause notice---Scope---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Show caused notice was issued on allegations of failure to impose or collect sales tax---Mere show Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11 | Assessment of tax and recovery |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Show cause notice issued on allegations of failure to impose or collect sales tax---Scope and applicability of S.11, Sales Tax Act, 1990---‘Redundancy’, principle Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ----Constitution of Pakistan 11, 30, 31, 32 & 2 (18).---- Art.199 | Assessment of tax; Power/delegation of powers |
Constitutional petition---Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Show cause notice, validity of---Appointment of authorities---Powers/delegation of powers, validity of---Officer of Inland Revenue’---Definition Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Delegation of powers | Delegation/sub-delegation |
Delegation/sub-delegation of powers---Permissibility---Delegatee cannot further delegate its powers unless expressly authorized under the law---In order to enable a person to delegate powers or functions, there must be an authority, express or implied, to Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Administration of justice | Redundancy |
Void order---Effect---If the basic order is void, then any superstructure built thereupon is also illegal and liable to fall. ‘Redundancy’, principle of---Applicability---Redundancy cannot attributed to the Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2016 |
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Manager (Pricing) VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Interpretation of statues | Harmonious construction |
Harmonious construction, principle of---Every word used in a statute must be given its true meaning and the provisions must be construed together in a harmonious manner---One provision cannot be applied in isolation from other Read More... |
2016 PTD 1675 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE VS AMTEX LTD. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 7, 21 & 47 | De-registration; blacklisting |
De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of supplier---Issuance of refund---Validly issued invoices by supplier would not be affected by subsequent blacklisting of such supplier unless such invoices were specifically declared fake through speaking order after Read More... |
2016 PTD 1695 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Interpretation of statutes---- | Taxing statutes |
--Taxing statutes----One can only look for intendment or language used in law and there was no room for intendment or presumption on interpretation of law-----Person sought to be taxed could only be taxed when he came within letter of Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- -Preamble & S.3 | Preamble & S.3--- Nature, purpose and scope of Sales tax |
-----Preamble & S.3----Nature, purpose and scope of Sales tax----Sales tax, in its present shape for all practical purposes was similar to value added tax and was generally called also consumer’s tax----Such tax was ultimately charged from buyer and even if Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ----S. 3 & Chapter-II | Scope of tax for retailer |
---Scope of tax for retailer----Retailer operates under Chapter II of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and not only paid tax under Chapter II of Sales Tax Act, 1990 but was also liable to pay tax at standard rates when sales/supplies were made to a person who deducted income at Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales tax---- | “Retailer” and “final consumer of goods”----- |
---“Retailer” and “final consumer of goods”-----Meaning----Words and phrases occurring in a provision of law were not to be taken in an isolated or detached manner, disassociated from the context---Such words and phrases were to be read together and Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Public Functionary------- | Duties of |
---Duties of----Under the Constitution all state functionaries were expected to work within permissible norms of law and justice----Any undue and harsh action by state functionaries against a taxpayer spoke volume of mala fide on their part as a flagrant violation Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- S. 71 | Special procedure----Overriding effect |
----Special procedure----Overriding effect----“Anything” occurring in S. 71, Sales Tax Act, 1990----Connotation----“Anything”, occurring in S.71, Sales Tax Act, 1990 broadly expanded scope of S. 71 for purposes of overriding effect of all provisions Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Interpretation of statutes---- | Statute--- read as a whole |
----Statute was required to be read as a whole and not in a piecemeal manner---Interpretation of law was sole prerogative of Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Constitution of Pakistan---- ----Art. 25 | Equality of citizens |
---Equality of citizens----Where an order passed by any forum, authority or court was patently illegal or against express provisions of law, if allowed to stay intact, would tantamount to and cause prejudice and serious breach of legal rights of citizens----To enjoy Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ----S. 25 | Drawing of samples----Interpretation of S. 25 |
---Drawing of samples----Interpretation of S. 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990----If S. 25 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 had prescribed a specific method for doing a thin in a specific manner and provided certain rights to taxpayers, such provisions of law was to be followed Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Discretion | Exercise of |
----Exercise of----Discretion will become an act of discrimination when the same was improper or capricious exercise or abuse of discretionary authority and person against whom that discretion was exercised faced certain appreciable disadvantages which he would not Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales tax | Tax fraud-Burden of proof--- |
Tax fraud-Burden of proof---In order to attract provisions relating to tax fraud, initial burden lay on the department to show that taxpayer knowingly, dishonestly, or fraudulently and without any lawful excuse had done any act or caused omission to take any action Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Sales tax | Public functionaries, role of |
-----Public functionaries, role of---If department was permitted to conduct void proceedings without adhering to any lawful jurisdiction, it would compromise neutrality of taxation system----Such action would also create a statutory anamoly whereby department had to Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Administration of justice | Public functionaries, role of--- When law specified a particular manner |
----Court, duty of----Court was to weigh conflicting evidence and to draw its own inferences and conclusions in order to administer substantial justice. -----When it was said that something was to be done within discretion of authorities, it meant that Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
Evidence- | Proof----Party making an allegation |
---Proof----Party making an allegation must bring material evidence to prove the same----Any action which was based upon no evidence or flimsy, fanciful grounds was not permitted by any Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
General Clauses Act (X of 1897)---- ----S. 24A----Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), | Preamble----Speaking order |
Preamble----Speaking order----Authorities, duties of----Authority exercising statutory powers of adjudication/assessment or appeal affecting valuable right of parties should act as quasi-judicial authority and while exercising such powers must pass a speaking order Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs HONDA POINT (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE
VS C.I.R., AUDIT, R.T.O.-1, LAHORE and others |
General Clauses Act (X of 1897)-------S. 24A | Speaking order |
---Speaking order-----Scope----Non-speaking and sketchy order could not be said to meet requirements of judicial order, which must contain contentions raised before authority by rival parties and its reasoning based on evidential substance for passing a reasoned Read More... |
2016 PTD 57 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
KHYBER TEA AND FOOD COMPANY and another
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another Customs Appeal No.K-845 of 2013, decided on 6th August, 2015. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----- ----S. 2(16)----Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007---Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), S.2(16) | Term ‘manufacture’, meaning of |
----Term ‘manufacture’, meaning of----Contention of importer was that he possessed necessary manufacturing facility to be entitled to exemption from payment of 3% value addition sales tax imposed under Sales Tax Special Procedures Rules, 2007----Department’s Read More... |
2016 PTD 80 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
KHYBER TEA AND FOOD COMPANY and another
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another Customs Appeal No.K-845 of 2013, decided on 6th August, 2015. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ----S. 36 | Order-in-Original |
---Order-in-Original raising demand was issued on 28-5-2013-----Officer empowered to recover dues was an officer of Inland Revenue as substituted for officer of Sales Tax by Finance Act, 2010----Powers to recover dues had been withdrawn from officer of Sales Tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 80 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
DAEWOO PAKISTAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----- -----S. 7A | Value Added Tax (VAT)----Connotation--- |
---VAT is a tax levied on value added in each stage of production and distribution process and can be aptly defined as ultimate form of consumption Read More... |
2016 PTD 152 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
DAEWOO PAKISTAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHER |
Interpretation of statutes----- | Fiscal statute----Ambiguity---Effect |
----Such provisions must be strictly construed and if there is any ambiguity, it has be resolved in favour of Read More... |
2016 PTD 152 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
DAEWOO PAKISTAN VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHER |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----------Ss. 7A & 8 (g)----- Sales Tax special Procedure Rules, 2007, Rr. 58F(2) & 58C(1)----Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 Value Added Tax | Value Added Tax |
----Constitutional petition----Value Added Tax (VAT)----Notices of recovery----Stage of import-----Petitioner company was aggrieved of notice issued by authorities for recovery of VAT-----Validity----Importer was held entitled to deduct import tax paid during a tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 152 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2016 |
MUHAMMAD ASIF VS The STATE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) 2(37), 33(5), 33(8), 33(11-C), 33(12), 33(13) & 33(16)--- ---498 | Evasion of Sales tax---Pre-arrest bail grant |
Evasion of sales tax---Pre-arrest bail, grant of---Accused was director of a business concern and the allegation against him and his co-accused was that the record recovered from their business premises disclosed huge discrepancies pointing towards a willful and Read More... |
2016 PTD 2393 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs PESHAWAR ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, WAPDA HOUSE, PESHAWAR
VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, R.T.O., PESHAWAR |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ------Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007--- 2(20), 3, 7, 11 & 46--- ---R.58-H---SRO No.678(I)/2007, dated 6-7-2007---SRO No.480(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007 | Short payment of sales tax; Adjustment of input tax |
Short payment of sales tax---Adjustment of input tax---Assessing Officer, observed that company/registered person had paid short sales tax for the period under reference---Assessing Officer raised demand of tax along with penalty and default Read More... |
2016 PTD 2413 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Messrs EAC ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and 3 others |
Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2007 1,2(2)(A) | Disputed question of fact |
Disputed question of fact---Collection of sales tax---Show cause notice was issued to petitioner for short withholding of sales tax as it was withholding agent---Validity---High Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction could not go into question involving minute Read More... |
2016 PTD 1761 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
AMTEX LIMITED KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), R.T.O., FAISALABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 2(14), 7 & 8- | Input Tax |
Input tax---Making input tax adjustment---Condition of physical transfer of goods---Law required no proof of physical transfer of goods from supplier to buyer as a pre-condition for making an input tax adjustment or Read More... |
2015 PTD 1174 2016 PTCL 630 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
AMTEX LIMITED KHURRIANWALA, FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A), R.T.O., FAISALABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 8-A | Deposit of sales tax in national exchequer |
Deposit of sales tax in national exchequer---Scope of S.8-A, Sales Tax Act, 1990---Provisions of S.8-A of Sales Tax Act, 1990, simply required that the buyer should have the prior knowledge and reasonable grounds to suspect that the supplier would not deposit the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1174 2016 PTCL 630 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
Messrs MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, MEPCO COMPLEX, KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN
VS COMMISSIONER (IR), ZONE-II, R.T.O., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(19), 2(35), 2(46), 3(1)(a), 13, 46 | Treating government subsidy as taxable income |
Scope of sales tax---Treating government subsidy as taxable income---Appellant, a public limited company, was engaged in business of distribution and supply of electricity after purchasing from National Transmission and Distribution Company---Adjudicating Authority Read More... |
2016 PTD 1829 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
C.I.R., ZONE-IV, R.T.O.-II
VS Messrs PEARL PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7, 8(1)(d), 8A, 11(2), 25, 46, 73 | Determination of tax liability; Failure to pay tax due |
Determination of tax liability---Failure to pay tax due, or making short payment and claiming input tax---Registered person/respondent, after verifying the status and genuineness of the supplier, made payments of input tax, and fulfilled all the legal Read More... |
2016 PTD 1877 (2016)114 TAX 116 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
H.A.H. PACKAGES, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II, R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 36, 45, 46 | Ex parte sales tax order passed by Collector |
Ex parte sales tax order passed by Collector---Ex parte sales tax order, passed by concerned ACIR, was assailed by registered person---No body having appeared on adjourned date of hearing, on behalf of the registered person, Appellate Authority proceeded ex parte, Read More... |
2016 PTD 2002 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Director of Intelligence & Investigation. VS Aslam Hashim Butt. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ---Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, Chap. XII, Part-B 37---- Art,12---R.134 | Summon persons to give evidence |
Power to Summon persons to give evidence and produce documents in inquiries under Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope and validity---Confidential communication---Scope---Whether an officer of the Sales Tax, Inland Revenue could summon petitioner, an advocate, while dealing Read More... |
2016 PTD 2043 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Director of Intelligence & Investigation. VS Aslam Hashim Butt. |
Counsel and client | Counsel and client |
Relationship of counsel and client---Nature and scope---Counsel client relationship, being fiduciary in nature, could not be allowed to be betrayed at any cost---Entire legal system would collapse if the members of the Bar were compelled to disclose about any fact, Read More... |
2016 PTD 2043 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2016 |
CIR, Zone-I, LTU, Lahore VS M/S BECTON DICKINSON PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD., Lahore |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 74 | Adjustment of sales tax liability against income tax refund |
Adjustment of sales tax liability against income tax refund---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of delay---Department had filed application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal---Submission of department was that appeal could not be filed within Read More... |
2016 PTD 2052 2017 (115) TAX 126 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Supreme Tube Industries (Pvt.) Limited. VS Federation of Pakistan etc. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(14) & 2(20) | Input tax; output tax |
‘Input tax’/’output tax’---Meaning and scope---Input tax, as defined in S. 2 (14) of Sales Tax, 1990, is a tax levied under the Act on the supply of goods to the persons, which means that input tax is paid by the registered person or purchase of goods in the Read More... |
2016 PTD 2058 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Supreme Tube Industries (Pvt.) Limited. VS Federation of Pakistan etc. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 7, 8, 8B & 73 | tax liability; Tax credit |
Scope of tax---Determination of tax liability---Tax credited not allowed---Adjustable input tax---Certain transactions not admissible---Scope---Section 3 of the Act levies sales tax and S.7 subject to Ss. 8 & 8 B of the Act determines the tax liability---Section Read More... |
2016 PTD 2058 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Supreme Tube Industries (Pvt.) Limited. VS Federation of Pakistan etc. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 7 & 8B | Adjustable input tax |
Determination of tax liability---Adjustable input tax---Basic right to seek input tax adjustment is provided for in S. 7 of the Act, which determines the tax liability of the registered person---Entitlement of the registered person for adjustment of input tax is Read More... |
2016 PTD 2058 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
Supreme Tube Industries (Pvt.) Limited. VS Federation of Pakistan etc. |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ---Constitution of Pakistan 8 B----Art. 23 | Input tax adjustment up to 90% of the output tax |
Adjustable input tax---Constitutionality---‘Unreasonable restriction’, principle of---Applicability---Fundamental right as to provision of property---Petitioners challenged the show cause notice, which provided that the petitioner had claimed excessive input tax Read More... |
2016 PTD 2058 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2016 |
PETITIONERS: MESSRS AHMAD TRADERS, GUJRANWALA VS RESPONDENTS: COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE. R.T.O. GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46 | Delay in filing appeal |
Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2010, R.27---Delay in filing appeal---Condonation of delay---Registered person filed appeal against order-in-appeal passed by Appellate Authority---None appeared on behalf of registered person on the date of hearing of appeal---Application Read More... |
2016 PTD 2098 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs NERA ASA, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 11, 25, 36 & 46 | suppression of sales---contracts for completion of projects on ‘turnkey’ basis and not of supplies |
Recovery of amount on the allegation of suppression of sales and adjustment of inadmissible input tax---Respondent, a foreign taxpayer company, having a branch office in Islamabad, dealing in execution of contracts for supply, and installation of telecommunication Read More... |
2015 PTD 1720 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD VS Messrs NERA ASA, ISLAMABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Words and phrases |
----Words and phrases used in statute of which no specific definition was provided therein, would have common and ordinary dictionary Read More... |
2015 PTD 1720 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
MS. PAUL LEATHER INDUSTRIES, Lahore VS C.I.R., ZONEX, R.T.O., Lahore |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 11, 25, 33, 34, 38, 45-A, 46 & 72-B---S.R.O. No.509(I)/2007 dated 9-6-2007---S.R.O. No.283(I)/2011 dated 1-4-2011---S.R.O. No.1125(I)/2011 dated 31-12-2011 | Inadmissible input tax |
Refund allegedly sanctioned on account of inadmissible input tax---Recovery of---Appellant/taxpayer, on basis of contravention report received from the Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation, was found to have claimed inadmissible input tax of Rs.2,48,544,863 Read More... |
2015 PTD 1438 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 8, 8-A, 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73 | Inadmissible input |
Show-cause notice for recovery of sales tax, default surcharge and penalty on the allegation of illegality claimed/adjusted inadmissible input tax---Appellate Authority below maintained order passed by Adjudicating Authority---Validity---Adjudicating Authority Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 8-A & 46--- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 117 & 118 | Input tax---Entitlement |
Reclaiming or deduction of input tax---Entitlement---Provisions of S.8-A of Sales Tax Act, 1990, were not attracted in the appellant/company’s case, because to attract such provisions---Initial burden lay on the department to establish that taxpayer had prior Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 8(1)(ca)(d), 22, 24 & 46 | Input tax adjustment |
Input tax adjustment---Claim for---Tax fraud---Liability of department---Appellant firm provided purchase invoices issued by the suppliers, as an evidence to claim input tax adjustment---Department had power to conduct post refund audit and call for any Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs STYLO SHOES, LAHORE
VS C.I.R. ZONE-X, R.T.O.-II, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(37), 11, 33, 34, 36, 38 & 46---Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, Rr.3, 5 & 6---S.R.O. 1125(I)/2011, dated 31-12-2011, clause(viii)---S.R.O. 1(I)/2011, dated 01-1-2011 | Assessment of sales tax |
Assessment of sales tax---Modes---Appellant/registered person, was engaged in retail sales of footwear, hand bags and other accessories, was registered as “retailer”---Contravention report against appellant alleged that appellant was paying turnover tax under Read More... |
2015 PTD 2172 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(37) | Tax fraud---Burden of proof |
Tax fraud---Burden of proof---In order to attract the provisions of S.2(37) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, dealing with tax fraud, initial burden lay on the department to show that the taxpayer, knowingly, dishonestly or fraudulently and without any lawful exercise, had Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 21 | De-registration, blacklisting and suspension |
De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration---Retrospective effect---Scope---If blacklisting or suspension of registration of a supplier was effected subsequent to a period in which purchases and bank payments were transacted, supplier could not be Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(37) & 33 | Tax fraud---Imposition of penalty |
Tax fraud---Imposition of penalty---Both authorities below, had erred in law and on facts of the case in imposing/upholding 100% penalty on appellant company---Penalty proceedings under the fiscal laws were independent proceedings and had nothing to do with the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
MADNI PACKAGES (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER (I.R.) Zone-IV, RTOII, KARACHI |
Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 1---Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 | Qanun-e-Shahadat applicable to all proceedings |
Scope and applicability---Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 was applicable to all proceedings in or before any court including a Court Martial a tribunal or other authority exercising judicial or quasi-judicial Read More... |
2015 PTD 1490 (2015) 111 TAX 165 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ALAZIZ PAPER MILLS, Lahore VS COLLECTOR F.E. & S.T., Lahore |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 33, 36 & 46 | Recovery---Limitation |
Short payment of Excise Duty and Sales Tax---Recovery---Limitation---Assesse, alleged to have made short payment of Central Excise Duty and Sales Tax, was served with show-cause notice---Adjudicating Officer, under provisions of S.36(3) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 was to Read More... |
2015 PTD 1543 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
Messrs ALAZIZ PAPER MILLS, Lahore VS COLLECTOR F.E. & S.T., Lahore |
Administration of justice | basic action/order was without lawful authority |
----Where basic action/order was without lawful authority, superstructure built on the same had to fall on the ground Read More... |
2015 PTD 1543 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Messrs LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. through Director Legal
VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11A, 11, 48 | e-filing of Returns |
e-filing of the returns along with required information does not take away the ability or the requirement of the Respondents to verify the information provided in the returns.
Even otherwise, section 11A has practically lost its efficacy after Read More... |
2015 PTD 1 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Messrs LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. through Director Legal VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11A, 11, 48 | Tax Due |
We are afraid, the view expressed in the impugned judgment that verification of electricity bills, placed on the website of the appellant, is permissible and Read More... |
2015 PTD 1 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION
VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and 2 others 2014. |
Customs Act (IV of 1969) Ss. 32(2), 156(1)(10-A)(14), 193 & 194-A | Evading amount of customs; show-cause notice |
Evading amount of customs duty and taxes---Issuance of show-cause notice---Dismissal of appeal on ground of limitation---Appellant corporation allegedly evaded considerable amount of customs duty and taxes, chargeable on the re-import of their aircraft engines after Read More... |
2015 PTD 1549 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs SAFE LIFE (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director VS FEDERATON OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Chairman and 4 others |
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)-- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 ---Ss. 32 & 33 | Alternate remedy--- recovery notices |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Alternate remedy---Effect---Constitutional petition in presence of alternate remedy under S.34 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005---Maintainability---Petitioner / taxpayer impugned recovery notices under the Federal Excise Read More... |
2015 PTD 1555 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs SAFE LIFE (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director VS FEDERATON OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Chairman and 4 others |
Constitution of Pakistan ---Art. 199 | Alternate remedy |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Alternate Remedy---Scope---High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution did not exercise any appellate jurisdiction and jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution was an extraordinary jurisdiction which Read More... |
2015 PTD 1555 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS TARIQ POLY PACK (PVT) LTD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--Ss. 8A, 8, 7, 3(3), 11 & 21--- Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R. 12(5) | Tax credit not allowed---Joint and several liability of registered persons in supply chain |
Tax credit not allowed---Joint and several liability of registered persons in supply chain where tax was unpaid---Re-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration---Interpretation of R. 12(5) of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006---Question before the High Court Read More... |
2015 PTD 2256 (2015) 111 TAX 405 2016 PTCL 449 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS TARIQ POLY PACK (PVT) LTD |
Interpretation of statutes | Tax statutes |
Tax statutes---Where two interpretations are possible then one, which advances the cause of justice, was to be adopted and in case of any doubt, the same had to be resolved in favour of the Read More... |
2015 PTD 2256 (2015) 111 TAX 405 2016 PTCL 449 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-II REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-II
VS Messrs SONY TRADERS WINE SHOP |
Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 196 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 47 Income Tax Ordinance, (XLIX of 2001), S.133 | New plea; Question of fact |
Reference to High Court---New plea---Question of fact---Authorities were aggrieved of finding of Appellate Tribunal and raised new pleas which were not raised before forums below---Validity---While hearing reference application either under S.47 of Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2287 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LTD. and others
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, M/O Finance and others |
Good governance | Sovereign commitments |
Scope---Great importance is attached to government adhering to sovereign commitments made by it, whether in the form of statutory orders or notifications issued by it or in the shape of policies announced by it---Commitment made on behalf of government should Read More... |
2015 PTD 2304 (2016)113 TAX 482 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LTD. and others
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, M/O Finance and others |
General Clauses Act (X of 1897) S. 21 | Locus poenitentiae |
Locus poenitentiae, principle of---Scope---Mere fact that power to withdraw exemption notification exists with government does not necessarily imply that such power should be exercised---Such power cannot be exercised in violation of settled principles of law and it Read More... |
2015 PTD 2304 (2016)113 TAX 482 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LTD. and others
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, M/O Finance and others |
Administration of justice | What cannot be done directly |
---What cannot be done directly can also not be done Read More... |
2015 PTD 2304 (2016)113 TAX 482 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LTD. and others
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, M/O Finance and others |
Interpretation of statute | Notification / Retrospective effect |
Retrospective effect---Principle---Notification which purports to impair an existing or vested right or imposes a new liability or obligation cannot operate retrospectively in absence of legal Read More... |
2015 PTD 2304 (2016)113 TAX 482 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LTD. and others
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, M/O Finance and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2 (26) (42) & 7 (2)(iv) Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992), S. 6---S.R.O. No.477(I)/1995, dated 14-6-1995---S.R.O. No.515(I)/95, dated 14-6-1995 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199--- Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3 | Intra-court Appeal; Exemptions |
Intra-court Appeal---Exemptions, withdrawal of---Grievance of appellant company was that exemptions granted by law could not be withdrawn with executive notifications---Validity---If an exemption from payment of excise duty or any other tax was granted for a Read More... |
2015 PTD 2304 (2016)113 TAX 482 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs QADIR FABRICS through Managing Partner
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(37) & 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.497 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Sales tax fraud; Grant of bail |
Constitutional petition---Sales tax fraud---Grant of bail---Depositing of post-dated cheques in court---Petitioners were alleged to be involved in a sales tax fraud, and were accordingly challaned in the Court of Special Judge Customs and Taxation---Petitioners Read More... |
2015 PTD 2321 (2017)115 TAX 162 2016 PTCL 48 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs WATEEN TELECOM (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD
VS C.I.R., LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 3, 6(2), 7, 11, 33, 34 & 46--- Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss.3, 4, 8, 14, 16 & 19---S.R.O. 548(I)/2012, dated 27-5-2012 | Failures of taxpayer to file Sales tax return |
Failure of taxpayer to file Sales tax return---Levy of penalty and default surcharge---Appellant had failed to files sales tax return for relevant period, violating provisions of Sales Tax Act, 1990, and Federal Excise Act, 2005---Adjudicating Authority, after Read More... |
2015 PTD 2352 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2015 |
HABIB BANK LIMITED through Attorneys VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 8 others |
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Government Act, 1990--- S. 65--- Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)--- S.44 | Publicity and advertisement/ Tax imposition |
Writ petition---Tax imposition of---Scope---Publicity and advertisement fee---Displaying of name of Bank outside of a branch---Collection of publicity/advertisement fee from the Bank---Laches, doctrine of---Applicability---Municipal Corporation issued demand notices Read More... |
2015 PTD 1757 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs ARIF EHSAN PRINTERS
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE - (APPEALS) R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing statute |
Taxing statute---Construction---Principles---Plain words and patent meanings of law, were to be applied and interpreted as they were, and no latent meanings were to be attached to the patent words which convey the plain and obvious meanings---One had to look at the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1777 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs ARIF EHSAN PRINTERS
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE - (APPEALS) R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- S.11 | Assessment---Issuance of notice |
Assessment---Issuance of notice---Conditions---Provisions of S.11 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, stipulated different conditions for issuance of notice under S.11, firstly, the registered person failed to file the return, secondly, the registered person had not paid the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1777 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs ARIF EHSAN PRINTERS
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE - (APPEALS) R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 3, 11, 25, 46 & 72-B | Assessment of tax---Conduct of audit |
Assessment of tax---Conduct of audit---In the present case, Authority had conducted audit of appellant/registered person under S.25 of the Sales Tax on its own, without any prior selection from the Federal Board of Revenue, on the basis of random or parametrict Read More... |
2015 PTD 1777 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs ARIF EHSAN PRINTERS
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE - (APPEALS) R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 3, 11, 21 & 46 | Assessment of tax---Declaration of supplier as blacklisted |
Scope of tax---Assessment of tax---Declaration of supplier as blacklisted---Order-in-original, was passed in the case much after the tax period three years after the supplier unit was declared blacklisted---Department was not within the ambit of law while passing Read More... |
2015 PTD 1777 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 7, 8, 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73 | Inadmissible transactions; Recovery of Input tax |
Inadmissible transactions---Recovery of Input tax---Departmental appeal---Assessing Authority observed that respondent/registered person having not made payments to the different supplier units, had violated the provisions of S.73 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and ordered Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
M/S. EXIM ENTERPRISES, S.M. IKHLAS ROAD, FAISALABAD AND OTHERS VS C.I.R., R.T.O. FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 2(14), 7, 8, 11(2), 33, 34, 36, 45-B & 46 | Recovery of amount; erroneously refunded; Limitation |
Claim for inadmissible input tax credit---Recovery of amount erroneously refunded---Appeal---Limitation---Adjudicating Authority, vide order-in-original ordered recovery of amount erroneously refunded to taxpayer---Taxpayer being aggrieved of order-in-original, Read More... |
2015 PTD 2545 111 TAX 388 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 7(1), 8(1)(b), 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73---S.R.O. No.490(I)/2004 dated 12-6-2004 | Input tax adjustment |
Inadmissible transaction---Input tax adjustment, denial of---Departmental appeal---Assessing authority in the impugned order had held that respondent/registered person (company) had claimed inadmissible input tax and had violated the provisions of S.8(1) of the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 7, 8, 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73 | Inadmissible transactions---Difference in stocks |
Inadmissible transactions---Difference in stocks---Recovery of Sales Tax along with default surcharge and penalty---Assessing Authority detected that there was difference in stocks as per inventory and annual audited account for the relevant tax year---Sales tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- -Ss. 8, 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73 | Inadmissible transactions---Input tax claim on plant and machinery |
Inadmissible transactions---Input tax claim on plant and machinery---Denial of claim---Registered person/company, imported machinery for the business purposes, and paid sales tax at import stage, which was claimed by company as input tax---Same was disallowed by the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs KHYABAN PACKAGES, SAMUNDRI ROAD, FAISALABAD VS C.I.R. (ZONE-III), R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 2(37), 21(2), 33(4) & 73---Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.7(1)---S.R.O. No.555(I)/2006 dated 2-6-2006---Sales Tax General Order No.35/2012 dated 3-6-2012 | Blacklisting of registered person |
Blacklisting of registered person---Appellant/registered person, was blacklisted on allegation that it had violated provisions of S.73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 by not declaring its business bank accounts to the department---Condition of issuance of notification, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1643 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---II of 1990)--- Ss. 7, 8, 11, 22, 23, 26, 33, 34, 46 & 73---S.R.O. No.509(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007 | Recovery of input tax along with default surcharge and penalty |
Recovery of input tax along with default surcharge and penalty---Assessing Authority observed that registered person, had not provided the complete addresses, contact numbers and payment proof of the buyers to whom the supplies had been made to get the benefit of Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- ----Ss. 7, 8, 11, 33, 34, 46 & 73 FBR letter C. No.3(36) dated 14-7-2004 | Payments not received against supplies; Input tax adjustment, recovery of |
Payments not received against supplies---Input tax adjustment, recovery of---Department that observed that the registered person had not provided proof of receipts against supplies and as per audited accounts the debtors and creditors had been increased---Inference Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
Messrs NATIONAL GASES LTD. through Company Secretary
VS MINISTRY OF RAILWAY through Federal Secretary Railways and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- S. 5---Sales of Goods Act (III of 1930), S. 64-A(a)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Rate of tax and duties |
Constitutional petition---Rate of tax and duties, determination of---Factual controversy---Petitioner company contended that it was entitled for payment of any increase in the amount of taxes subsequent to an award of contract---Plea raised by authorities was that Read More... |
2015 PTD 2552 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
C.I.R. ZONE-VII .R.T.O. LAHORE VS Messrs T.U. PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ---Ss. 8, 11, 33, 34, 38, 40 & 46 | Difference in stocks; Recovery of sales tax |
Difference in stocks---Recovery of sales tax along with default surcharge and penalty---Assessing Authority had observed that as per audit account, that taxpayer had declared closing stock at Rs.283,127,137, whereas on physical verification there was no stock found Read More... |
2015 PTD 1805 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
HASEEB WAQAS SUGAR MILLS LTD VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN etc |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- S. 47 | Interpretation of S.47 |
Interpretation of S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Reference to High Court---Adjudication of reference application under S.47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Nature and scope of jurisdiction of High Court under S. 47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Bar to Read More... |
2015 PTD 1665 111 TAX 221 2016 PTCL 34 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs AHSAN ENTERPRISES ABDULLAHPUR FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A) FAISALABAD and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 11(2)(3) & 46 | Recovery of erroneously refunded amount |
Recovery of erroneously refunded amount of sales tax---Appellant/registered person as per report of audit team of post refund audit, had illegality received refund of input tax on the strength of invoices allegedly issued by suspended/blacklisted Read More... |
2015 PTD 1839 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs AHSAN ENTERPRISES ABDULLAHPUR FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A) FAISALABAD and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- S. 72 | Powers of officers of sales tax |
Powers of officers of sales tax---Officers of sales tax to follow Board’s orders---Officers of sales tax or other persons employed in the execution of Sales Tax Act, 1990, were not empowered under the law to raise any objection to the clarifications, circulars, Read More... |
2015 PTD 1839 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2015 |
Messrs AHSAN ENTERPRISES ABDULLAHPUR FAISALABAD
VS C.I.R.(A) FAISALABAD and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- S. 11---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.13 | Issuance of second show-case notice; double jeopardy |
Issuance of second show-case notice---Protection against double punishment/double jeopardy---Issuance of second show-cause notice regarding the same tax period, would amount to imposition of double taxation; and double jeopardy, which could not be given legal Read More... |
2015 PTD 1839 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Mst. SHAGUFTA ABDULLAH VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 3 others |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing statute |
Taxing statute---Scope---Taxing statute is to be construed literately in sense in which it has been provided---Intent of Legislature should be clear from words in the legislation---Court must look squarely at words of statute and interpret them in the light of what Read More... |
2015 PTD 1855 (2015)112 TAX 270 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
Mst. SHAGUFTA ABDULLAH VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 3 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 19900)--- Ss. 11(2) & 33(13)---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss.128 & 131(5)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Conditional stay |
Constitutional petition---Conditional stay---Undue hardship, non-pleading of---Assesse was aggrieved of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal granting stay with a condition to deposit 30% of disputed tax---Validity---Grant of stay as per Income Tax Read More... |
2015 PTD 1855 (2015)112 TAX 270 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2015 |
Messrs NEW SHALIMAR STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss.10 & 74 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.10 | Post refund audit |
Complaint---Post-refund audit---Withdrawal of complaint---Obtaining inadmissible refund of huge amount of Rs.102.04 million by concealment of duty free/sales tax free import of input materials by complainant company was under post refund audit with Directorate Read More... |
2015 PTD 1674 (2016) 113 TAX 40 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Islamabad Bench, Islamabad | 2015 |
VS |
Sales Tax | Supply of goods---Services as part and parcel of supply |
Supply of goods---Services as part and parcel of supply---Scope---Services provided by taxpayer were actually mandatory component of goods supplied by taxpayer and services were part and parcel of supply---Supply of goods was incomplete without service Read More... |
2015 PTD 2606 (2015) 111 TAX 285 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Islamabad Bench, Islamabad | 2015 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 7(2) | Recovery of input tax |
Recovery of input tax---Requirements---Mandatory requirement for claiming input tax under S. 7(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 to hold valid sales tax invoices---Where the taxpayer had admitted that he did not hold any invoices, claim of input tax adjustment could not be Read More... |
2015 PTD 2606 (2015) 111 TAX 285 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Islamabad Bench, Islamabad | 2015 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss. 74 & 66 | Input tax, claim of---Limitation |
Input tax, claim of---Limitation---Condonation of time limit---Section 74 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 provided condonation of time limit, if any---Registered person was directed to follow procedure laid down under Ss.66 & 74 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 for claiming input Read More... |
2015 PTD 2606 (2015) 111 TAX 285 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2015 |
HONDA FORT (PVT.) LTD.
VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-111, R.T.O., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 2(28), (47), 3, 11, 25(2), 38, 46 & 57---Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007, Rr.3 & 5(3)---S.R.O. No. 608(I)/2014, dated 2-7-2014---Clarification Letter C. No.3(72) STP/97(PT), dated 2-7-2004 | Clarification Letter Tax fraud; evasion of sales tax |
Clarification Letter Tax fraud and evasion of sales tax---Appellant company, was an authorized agent of cars manufacturing company and was engaged in the business of delivery of Car manufactured by manufacturer company---Appellant was providing various services to Read More... |
2015 PTD 2629 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
MESSRS CARVAN ENTERPRISES THROUGH MANAGER
VS CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH SECOND SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S. 45A--- Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) S.32---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Power of the Board and Commissioner to call for records |
Constitutional petition---Power of the Board and Commissioner to call for records---Finality of recommendations of Federal Tax Ombudsman---Scope---Petitioner’s / taxpayer’s sales tax refund was sanctioned by the Department whereafter show-cause notice was issued Read More... |
2015 PTD 2639 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
FLYING CEMENT COMPANY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND others |
Taxation | Tax and fee |
“Tax and fee”---Distinction---Tax was a common burden for raising revenue compulsorily from the public---Tax was a compulsory extraction of money by the government for a public purpose without reference to any special benefit on the prayer of the tax and the Read More... |
2015 PTD 1945 (2017) 115 TAX 290 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
FLYING CEMENT COMPANY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND others |
Constitution of Pakistan ----Art. 77 & Fourth Schedule, Parts I & II | Federal Legislative list; Taxation |
Federal Legislative List---Taxation---Non-tax entries on the Federal Legislative List---Question as to whether the non-tax entries or subject specific generic entries on the Federal Legislative List included the power to taxation---Federal Legislative had the power Read More... |
2015 PTD 1945 (2017) 115 TAX 290 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
FLYING CEMENT COMPANY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND others |
Taxation | Imposition; administration and implementation of taxes |
Imposition, administration and implementation of taxes---Legislature and Executive, powers of---Delegation of power of taxation by the Legislature to the Executive---Scope---Legislature was omnipotent in the exercise of the taxing prerogative---Whereas the right to Read More... |
2015 PTD 1945 (2017) 115 TAX 290 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2015 |
FLYING CEMENT COMPANY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND others |
Legislature | Delegation of power by the Legislature |
Delegation of power by the Legislature---Scope---Legislature could not repose any power, essentially legislature, in another body or organ; it could not efface itself and set up a parallel legislative authority; it must exercise its judgement on vital matters of Read More... |
2015 PTD 1945 (2017) 115 TAX 290 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2015 |
Messrs ADVANCE BUSINESS SYSTEM and others
VS FOP and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss.11 & 37-A Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Tax due--scope |
Constitutional petition---Quashing of FIR by the department---Proceedings on adjudication side---Term “tax due”---Scope---Petitioners were registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990, and sought quashing of FIR against them---Plea raised by petitioners was that Read More... |
2015 PTD 2004 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2015 |
MUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- Ss. 2(14)(37), 3, 7, 8(1)(d), 21(3) & 45-A Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.12(5)---S.R.O. 555(I)/2006, dated 5-6-2006 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.10 | Input tax on invoices of a corporation |
Issuance of notices on the issues already adjudged---Complaint had been filed against Commissioner for declaring the issuance of show-cause notices as void ab initio on the issues already adjudged by Appellate Authority---Allegation was that complainant had claimed Read More... |
2015 PTD 2141 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2015 |
Messrs PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD., Karachi VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX and another |
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--- ----Ss. 85, 12, 13, 80, 81, 86, 87, 88, 89, 94, 104 & 105 | Warehousing of Goods |
Application for warehousing---Warehousing of goods---Procedure---Goods were either warehoused in Public Bonded Warehouse under S. 12 of Customs Act, 1969 or Private Bonded Warehouse under S. 13 of Customs Act, 1969 goods declaration, for warehousing, had to be filed Read More... |
2015 PTD 2146 |
|
CUSTOMS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL | 2015 |
Messrs PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LTD., Karachi VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX and another |
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--- Ss. 131, 104, 105 & 106 | Clearance of warehoused goods for export |
Clearance of warehoused goods for export---Importer filed several Goods Declarations for export under S.131 of Customs Act, 1969 and not under Ss.105 & 106 of the Act---Contention of importer was that supplies made were duty-paid, for consumption of Pakistan Read More... |
2015 PTD 2146 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ----S.8 (1)(ca) | Tax credit not allowed |
Tax credit not allowed---Scope---Every person has a separate legal character enjoying distinct rights and liabilities under the law and to impose the liability of one over the other is opposed to the fundamentals of law and offends due process, logic and Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.2(37) | Tax Fraud--definition of “tax fraud” |
Tax fraud---Definition of “tax fraud” as given under S.2(37) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 is that the alleged person should have done any act knowingly, dishonestly or fraudulently and without any lawful Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ----S.2(37) | Tax fraud; Burden of proof |
Tax fraud---Burden of proof---In the present case, there was not any iota of evidence wherefrom it could be deducted that the taxpayer had knowingly or dishonestly or fraudulently committed any tax fraud by claiming adjustment of input tax against tax invoices Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss.7 & 21 | De-registration; Blacklisting and suspension of registration |
Determination of tax liability---De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration---Operative persons---Adjustment of input tax---Vital fact in the present case could not be ignored that at the time of making transactions, the suppliers were enjoying Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---- ---S.30A---S.R.O. 471(I)/2007 dated 9-6-2007 | Jurisdiction—DG I & I |
Directorate General, (Intelligence and Investigation) Inland Revenue---Jurisdiction---Federal Board of Revenue was assigned jurisdiction of sales tax matters in Finance Act, 2007 wherein cases of tax evasion and tax fraud in sphere of value added General Sales Tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Administration of justice | If something is stated to be done in a particular manner |
If something is stated to be done in a particular manner it has to be done in that manner only, otherwise, any deviation in this regard would vitiate the whole Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- - ----Ss.8(1)(a)(b) & 7(1) | Tax credit not allowed; Input goods |
Tax credit not allowed---Manufacturing of paper and Board---Input goods and manufacturing of finished goods---Input tax on furnace oil---Department contended that taxpayer was not entitled to claim input tax adjustment or credit on furnace oil which was not directly Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S. 73 | Certain transactions not admissible |
Certain transactions not admissible---Bank payments under S.73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 was just a mode of payment embodied in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 for the purpose of documentation of the economy and if the same was not complied with due to some ignorance and Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RAZA APPARELS, FAISALABAD VS CIR, RTO, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 10(4), 11(2), 7, 8, 26 & 73---Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2002 | Refund of input tax; Rejection of |
Refund of input tax---Rejection of---Taxpayer contended that it was primarily confronted with the allegation of “invoice summary not submitted” in the show-cause notice whereas order of adjudicating authority as well as First Appellate Authority provide Read More... |
2014 PTD 600 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss.46 & 48(1)(b)---Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.71(2)(b) | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal; Stay application |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application---Taxpayer had already availed stay period of 120 days granted by the Appellate Tribunal during the pendency of main appeal, but this fact was concealed in the present stay application---Main appeal had already been Read More... |
2014 PTD 604 (2014)109 TAX 177 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ----Ss.46, 2(18), 30 & 57--- Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss.2(2) & 130--- Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rules, 2010, Rr.9 & 13---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VI, R.15 & O.III, R.2---Court Fee Act (VII of 1870), Sched. II, Art. 1 | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal; Stay application |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application---Deficiencies in stay application were that application had been filed without any instructions from the registered person, as it was not supported by any Authority letter or Power-of-Attorney from registered person; Read More... |
2014 PTD 604 (2014)109 TAX 177 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
ISLAMABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (IESCO)
VS COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.46---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.III, R.2 | Stay application; Concealed the fact of stay period of 120 days |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application was supported by an affidavit which concealed the fact of stay period of 120 days already granted by the Appellate Tribunal during the pendency of main appeal and failed to disclose the fact of another stay application Read More... |
2014 PTD 604 (2014)109 TAX 177 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
Chaudari SHABBIR HUSSAIN VS The STATE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss.2(37), 3, 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 26, 33, 34, 37-A & 73---S.R.O. 1125(I)/2011, dated 31-12-2011--- Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.497 | Bail was refused/ Tax fraud |
Tax fraud---Bail, grant of---Accused was alleged to have been engaged in tax fraud by facilitating different manufacturers/importers of textile related items by misusing provisions of S.R.O.1125(I)/2011, dated 31-12-2011---Validity---Company of accused was not Read More... |
2014 PTD 612 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
MESSRS MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD THROUGH CHIEF
EXECUTIVE VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----S. 46(1)--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Recovery of sales tax on electricity bills---Stay against disconnection |
Constitutional petition---Recovery of sales tax on electricity bills---Stay against disconnection of electricity connection till disposal of appeal by Appellate forum---Scope---Petitioner-company filed application before Commissioner Inland Revenue for zero-rating Read More... |
2014 PTD 841 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2014 |
Messrs S.R. ENTERPRISES VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) -S.7 | Determination of tax liability; Jurisdiction |
Determination of tax liability---Jurisdiction---Taxpayer contended that jurisdiction of the case vested in the specified Inland Revenue Officer while the assessment had been made by Inland Revenue Officer of other unit and assessment thus was out of jurisdiction and Read More... |
2014 PTD 104 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I), (R.T.O.), FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1969)- ---S. 4---S.R.O. 1125(I)/2001 dated 31-12-2011---FBR Letter C.No.4 (6) Sales Tax Act, 1990-L&P/2001-50774 dated 7-4-2012---Zero rating | Zero rating---Sales Tax on electricity bills |
---Zero rating---Sales Tax on electricity bills---Creation of liability by the “CREST”---Application for grant of zero rating facility of sales tax on electricity bills was not recommended to the Federal Board of Revenue on the ground that sales tax liability on Read More... |
2014 PTD 992 |
|
Customs Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs ALPHA CORPORATION VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (APPEALS), KARACHI and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 32-A, 79 & 80 | short payment of taxes |
Charge of short payment of taxes due to mis-declaration and mis-clarification of imported goods---Issuance of show-cause notice regarding such charge---Order-in-Original directing importer to pay short paid/evaded amount of tax while imposing penalty on Read More... |
2014 PTD 203 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I), (R.T.O.), FAISALABAD |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 25 | Equality of citizens |
---Equality of citizens---Doctrine of equality, as contained in Art. 25 of the Constitution, enshrines the golden rules to Islam; it states that ever citizen, no matter how highsoever, must be accorded equal treatment with similarly situated persons---Basic rule for Read More... |
2014 PTD 992 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs HOSPITALITY ENTERPRISES (SALT N PAPER) LAHORE VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR-III, CUSTOMS AND SALES TAX, LTU, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.46---Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rules, 2010, Rr.9 & 13---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VI, R.15 | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Miscellaneous application for recalling of order |
---Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Miscellaneous application for recalling of order---Maintainability---Representative of the taxpayer appeared and contended that case was adjourned for 21-6-2012, however in the diary he inadvertently noted the date of hearing as Read More... |
2014 PTD 1004 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
MESSRS AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199--- Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sixth Sched. Table 1, Sr. No15 & 6 | Constitutional jurisdiction/ alternate remedy |
---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sixth Sched. Table 1, Sr. No15 & 61---Constitutional jurisdiction---Scope---Exemption from Sales Tax---Constitutional jurisdiction is an extraordinary jurisdiction, which can be availed only when no alternate remedy is provided Read More... |
2014 PTD 1011 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
MESSRS AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL THROUGH PROPRIETOR VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Sixth Sched., Table 1, Sr. Nos. 15 & 61---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199--- | Exemption from sales tax |
Constitutional petition---Exemption from sales tax---Importer sought exemption of sales tax on import tinned/bottled or canned fruits---Validity---Exemption of sales tax was only available to edible fruits excluding imported fruits, with exception of fruits imported Read More... |
2014 PTD 1011 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS MAGNA TEXTILE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD VS C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)-- --Ss. 11(2), 8(1)(a), 21(3), 36(1) & 73---S.R.O. 555(I)/98 dated 1-7-1996---S.R.O. 1381(I)98 dated 28-11-1998 | Assessment of tax--- --Refund of input tax- |
---Assessment of tax---Tax period 2006-2007---Refund of input tax---Recovery of being input adjusted against blacklisted/suspended units---Taxpayer contended that adjudication order lacked jurisdiction in respect of cases beyond pecuniary limit of one million Read More... |
2014 PTD 1022 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.11(3)---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.24---S.R.O. 555(I)/1996 dated 1-7-1996 | Pecuniary Jurisdiction |
Assessment of tax---Pecuniary jurisdiction---Section 11(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 under which the notification S.R.O. 555(1)/1996 dated 1-7-1996 was issued had been repealed without any saving clause for said notification---If contention of the taxpayer that the Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.30(3)---S.R.O. 555(I)/1996 dated 1-7-1996 | Appointment of authorities; Pecuniary jurisdiction |
Appointment of authorities---Pecuniary jurisdiction---After creation of Inland Revenue Services, S.30(3) of Sales Tax Act, 1990 was substituted through Finance Act, 2010 which only empowered Commissioner Inland Revenue to direct their subordinate Officers to perform Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.11(3)---S.R.O. 555(1)/1996 dated 1-7-1996---S.R.O. 594(I)/2012 dated 1-6-2012 | Assessment of tax; Jurisdiction |
Assessment of tax---Jurisdiction---At the time of issuance of rescinding S.R.O. 594(I)/2012 dated 1-6-2012, the provisions of subsection (3) of S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 were not available on the statue book, whereunder S.R.O. 555(I)/1996 dated 1-7-1996 was Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.30(3)---S.R.O.555(I)/1996 dated 1-7-1996 | Appointment of authorities; Pecuniary jurisdiction |
Appointment of authorities---Pecuniary jurisdiction---Judgments on the issue of pecuniary jurisdiction were silent regarding implications of the “Finance Amendment Ordinance, 2009”, “Finance Amendment Ordinance, 2010”, Finance Act, 2010” and the Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S. 45B(2) | Appeal---Limitation |
Appeal---Limitation---Contention of the taxpayer that First Appellate Authority was legally bound to pass the order within 120 days as required under first proviso to S.45B(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 had no force as the first proviso to subsection (2) of S.45B of Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs RUPALI POLYESTER LTD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LTU, LAHORE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 33 & 34---S.R.O. 648(I)/2011 dated 25-6-2011 | Default surcharge; Amnesty |
Offences and penalties---Default surcharge---Amnesty---Adjustment of refund---Revenue had adjusted the adjudged principle amount of sale tax against its refund in consequence of a letter of the taxpayer---Federal Board of Revenue, at the relevant time, issued S.R.O. Read More... |
2014 PTD 353 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
Messrs AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL through Proprietor and others VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/ Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue and others |
Constitution of Pakistan--- Art. 199 | Alternative statutory |
Constitutional petition---Alternate statutory remedy against impugned order, availability of---Effect---Constitutional petition in such situation would not be Read More... |
2014 PTD 370 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
Messrs AL AMNA INTERNATIONAL through Proprietor and others VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/ Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Sixth Sched. Table-1, Sr. No. 15---Customs Act (IV of 1969), Ss.33, 79, 80, 179 & 193---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Goods released without payment of sales tax |
Constitutional petition---Tinned/bottled or canned fruits, import of---Importer got such goods released without payment of sales tax by wrongly claiming exemption under Sr. No. 15 of Table-I to Sixth Sched., of Sales Tax Act, 1990---Issuance of contravention report Read More... |
2014 PTD 370 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
HASHIM ASLAM BUTT VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and 4 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.37--- Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.9--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | Privileged communication---Address of client--- |
--Constitution petition---Privileged communication---Address of client---Petitioner was advocated who represented his client before Commissioner Inland Revenue---Investigating Authorities summoned petitioner under S.37 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, to obtain information Read More... |
2014 PTD 1051 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
MESSRS ASIF TRADERS AND ANOTHER VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS THROUGH ASSISTANT COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER |
Interpretation of statute--- | Notification / Exemption from sales tax |
----Retrospective effect---Principle---Notification which confers a benefit or right to a person can be given retrospective effect, whereas the notification which disturbs or impairs a vested right of a person or creates new liability cannot be applied Read More... |
2014 PTD 1057 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
MESSRS ITTEFAQ CLOTH CENTRE, GUJRANWALA VS C.I.R., R.T.O., GUJRANWALA |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.46---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.131(5) | Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application |
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Stay application---Taxpayer contended that department was pressing hard for recovery and had issued notice showing intention to take coercive measures for the recovery of the outstanding tax demand; that in case the demand was not Read More... |
2014 PTD 1063 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
Messrs GRAVITY MILLS LTD., LAHORE VS THE CIR, RTO., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- S.45B | Appeal---Limitation |
Appeal---Limitation---Issuance of attested copies of order---Taxpayer contended that First Appellate Authority was not justified to hold that the appeals filed by the appellant were barred by time, as orders were not served to the taxpayer and that the appeals were Read More... |
2014 PTD 375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
Messrs GRAVITY MILLS LTD., LAHORE VS THE CIR, RTO., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S. 36 | Recovery of tax; Show-cause notice |
Recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Conditions---Show Cause Notice could only be served under S.36 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 if any tax or charge had not been levied or had been short-levied or had been erroneously refunded; if such Read More... |
2014 PTD 375 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
Messrs GRAVITY MILLS LTD., LAHORE VS THE CIR, RTO., MULTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 11(2), 33(19), 34 & 36(1) Special Procedure for Ginning Industries Rules, 1996, R.6 (5) | Assessment of tax; Jurisdiction |
Assessment of tax and recovery of tax not levied or short levied or erroneously refunded---Jurisdiction---Taxpayer contended that order framed by the Assessing Officer was illegal and unlawful, as R.6 of Special Procedure for Ginning Industries Rules, 1996 did not Read More... |
2014 PTD 375 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU VS Messrs BROTHER SUGAR MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 66, 11 & 45B | Refund to be claimed within one year |
Refund to be claimed within one year---Department contended that order of First Appellate Authority was illegal and without lawful authority as the refund claimed filed by the taxpayer was barred by time; that order under S.66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 was an Read More... |
2014 PTD 386 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
C.I.R., ZONE-III, LTU VS Messrs BROTHER SUGAR MILLS LTD., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- Ss. 66, 11 & 45B | Assessment of tax; Further tax |
Assessment of tax---Further tax---Claim of refund---Refund of the taxpayer was rejected on the ground that since the taxpayer had passed on the incidence, it was not entitled for refund as the taxpayer had failed to establish that the incidence of tax had not been Read More... |
2014 PTD 386 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2014 |
Mian MUHAMMAD YOUSUF ZIA---Petitioner VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 3 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.3---S.R.O. No.951(I)/2005 dated 14-9-2005---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Sales invoice of vehicle |
Constitutional petition---Sales invoice of vehicle showing payment of sales tax @ 15% of its value---Demand of sales tax by Motor Registration Authority while registering such vehicle---Validity---Neither Notification S.R.O. 951(I)/2005 dated 14-9-2005 nor any other Read More... |
2014 PTD 393 |
|
Islamabad High Court | 2014 |
Mian MUHAMMAD YOUSUF ZIA---Petitioner VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 3 others |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ---- Art. 199 | illegal act of Government functionary |
---Constitutional petition challenging an illegal act of Government Read More... |
2014 PTD 393 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs FAZAL PAPER MILLS (PVT.) LTD., OKARA VS CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss.11(5), First proviso & 36(3) | Assessment of tax; Limitation |
Assessment of tax---Limitation---Registered person contended that as per First proviso to S.11(5) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 the assessment order was required to be made within 120 days of the issuance of Show-Cause Notice or within such extended period as the Read More... |
2014 PTD 448 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs FAZAL PAPER MILLS (PVT.) LTD., OKARA VS CIR, RTO, LAHORE |
Sales Tax | Limitation |
Limitation---Directory or mandatory---Where inaction on the part of a public functionary within the prescribed time likely to affect the rights of a citizen the prescription of time is deemed directory---Where, however, a public functionary is empowered to create Read More... |
2014 PTD 448 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2014 |
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL, KARACHI VS Messrs NIZAM IMPEX (PVT.) LTD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- S.34 | Additional tax |
--Imposition of penalty of additional tax---Scope---Provision of S.34 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 not mandatory, but discretionary---Deliberate non-payment or evasion of sales tax would attract provisions of S.34 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, but not Read More... |
2014 PTD 498 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. through Director Legal---Petitioner VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others---Respondents |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11-A, 48 |
Constitution petition---Short-paid amounts of Sales Tax recoverable without notice---Expression “as in its return”---Exercise of power under S.11-A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Scope---Petitioners were Electricity Supply Companies and impugned notices issued to Read More... |
2014 PTD 501 |
||
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs AMTEX (PVT.) LTD. and another VS CIR (LEGAL DIVISION), R.T.O., FAISALABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- Ss.7 & 73 | Input tax; Disallowance |
Determination of tax liability---Input tax---Disallowance of---Taxpayer contended that objections raised by STARR related to scrutiny for verification of input tax and was guideline for tax collectors and to enforce the provisions of law where payment of tax by the Read More... |
2014 PTD 544 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
Messrs AMTEX (PVT.) LTD. and another VS CIR (LEGAL DIVISION), R.T.O., FAISALABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- Ss.10 & 73 | Refund of input tax |
Refund of input tax---Automated refund system raised certain objections which were “Scrutiny for verification of input tax” “Abnormal Tax Profit” and MR No. and date mismatch---Taxpayer contended that compliance of the provisions of S.73 of the Sales Tax Read More... |
2014 PTD 544 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2014 |
Messrs ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Economic Affairs, and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) ---Ss. 47A & 47(A)(4A)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Alternate Dispute Resolution |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Alternate Dispute Resolution under S.47A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Alternate remedy---Petitioner/taxpayer sought direction to the effect that the Federal Board of Revenue amend its final assessment order Read More... |
2014 PTD 552 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2014 |
Messrs ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES LTD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Economic Affairs, and 2 others |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199 | Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court; Alternate remedy |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Alternate remedy---Scope---Where a particular statute provided a self-contained mechanism and a well-defined forum of redressal for the determination of questions of law or fact by way of appeal or revision, or Read More... |
2014 PTD 552 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 36(1), 10, 11, 22, 23, 26 & 73---Sales Tax Rules, 2006 | Suppression of Sales |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Taxpayer contended that tax liability by the detecting agency on the basis of record was created without confronting him and as such demand was raised at his back without making them party to Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- Ss. 36(1) & 21(3) | Recovery of Tax; Suspension of registration of taxpayer |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Suspension of registration of taxpayer---Recovery of adjusted amount of input tax on the charge of “registration suspended”---Validity---Recovery against invoices of a person whose registration Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 36(1), 10, 11, 22, 23, 26, 73 | Law specifies a particular manner |
When law specifies a particular manner and procedure then it is obligatory for the functionary of the State to adhere to the same and comply with it in all respects and any negligence, failure or omission to do so, invalidates the proceedings on account of which Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 36(1), 10, 11, 22, 23, 26, 73 | Recovery of tax |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---One cannot be penalized and impeded with undue and premature tax liability merely on the basis of an interim order like the suspension until and unless, it is eventually acted upon in the form of Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.8A | Joint and several liability |
Joint and several liability of registered person in supply chain where tax was unpaid---In order to attract the provisions of S.8A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, initial burden lies on the department to establish that the taxpayer had prior “knowledge” and Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.8A | Joint and several liability |
Joint and several liability of registered person in supply chain where tax was unpaid---Verification of status and genuineness of the supplier from e-portal---Taxpayer, under the prescribed mechanism of value added tax, had made payment of input tax to his supplier Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.8 (1)(d) | Joint and several liability; Collusion or tax fraud |
Joint and several liability of registered persons in supply chain where tax was unpaid---“Collusion” or “tax fraud”---Provisions of S.8(1)(d) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 could only be invoked in cases where charge of “collusion” or “tax fraud” had Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- S.8 (1)(d) | Fake Invoices |
“Fake invoice”---“Fake invoice” had neither collectively been defined in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 nor distinct and individual meanings of each word “fake” and “invoice” had been given therein nor any explanation had been enunciated in the Rules made Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Interpretation of statutes--- | Words used in statute not defined |
Words used in statute not defined---In the absence of general or technical definition by the legislature of any word or no particular connotation was appearing in the Act or the Rules framed thereunder or of any judicial interpretation of that word with reference to Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- S.8(1)(d) | Fake invoice; Connotation |
“Fake invoice”---Connotation of---Any invoice duly issued by registered supplier could not be purported to be a “fake document”, once it was established that the same was duly incorporated in sales shown by the supplier in his summary statement and also Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ---- S.8(1)(d) | Party making an allegation must bring material evidences to prove the same |
Party making an allegation must bring material evidences to prove the same---Where no evidence of tax evasion, issuing of fake invoices or any other commission of tax fraud was put forth on record to substantiate the allegations levelled against the taxpayer, Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 8(1)(d), 7(2)(i), 23 & 73 | Adjustment of input tax |
Determination of tax liability---Adjustment of input tax---For claiming adjustment of input tax under S.7(2)(i) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the taxpayer should hold a taxable invoice duly issued by his supplier under S.23 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and the claimant Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2014 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD VS Messrs CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) --Ss. 8(1)(ca), 3(3)(a) & 3(A)---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.23 & 24 | Tax credit not allowed/ suppliers had not deposited tax due |
Tax credit not allowed---Taxpayer was charged with violation of S.8(1)(ca) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 on the ground that his suppliers had not deposited tax due in national exchequer; and taxpayer was not entitled to claim the credit of input tax---Validity---On the Read More... |
2014 PTD 558 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
M/S. H.G.R., TRADERS, FAISALABAD VS COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, FAISALABAD |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 Ss. 2(14), & 21, | De-registration, blacklisting |
De-registration, blacklisting and suspension of registration-Sales tax registration was suspended on the ground that registered person had adjusted input tax against the purchase/sales of blacklisted/suspended/de-registered/non-functional units; and supply of goods Read More... |
2013 PTD 444 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R., Zone-II, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 36(1)-- | Recovery of tax |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Limitation---Invocation of provisions of S.36(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 did not authorize the officer to issue notice for a period beyond five years---Show cause notice was admittedly issued on Read More... |
2013 PTD 420 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R., Zone-II, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.4, 13, 2(41), 2(28) & Sixth Sched.---S.R.O. 548(I)/2006 dated 5-6-2006---S.R.O. 549(I)/2008 dated 11-6-2008-- | Zero rating---Exemption---Conflict |
Zero rating---Exemption---Conflict of primary and subordinate legislation---Effect--Taxpayer engaged in manufacture/import and supply of infant food items---Supply of such items was treated as chargeable to tax at zero per cent---Effect of claim of such supply was Read More... |
2013 PTD 420 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R., Zone-II, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.4 & 13 | Zero rating---Exemption |
-Zero rating---Exemption---Neither S.4 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 puts a bar on inclusion of goods covered by S.13 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 nor S.13 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 override S.4 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which showed that there was no conflict between Read More... |
2013 PTD 420 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R., Zone-II, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.45B | Treating a notification ineffective or ultra vires |
--Appeal---Treating a notification ineffective or ultra vires by the First Appellate Authority---Validity---Authorities below did not possess the power of treating a notification ineffective or ultra vires---By doing so, First Appellate Authority had transgressed Read More... |
2013 PTD 420 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs NESTLE PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE VS C.I.R., Zone-II, L.T.U., LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.72 | Officers of Inland Revenue to follow Federal Board |
---Officers of Inland Revenue to follow Federal Board's orders, etc---Ruling of the Federal Board of Revenue not only spelled out proper scheme of law but also carried a binding force on the authorities below under S.72 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and passing the Read More... |
2013 PTD 420 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, KARACHI |
Petroleum Products (Development Surcharge) Ordinance (XXV of 1961)--- Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S.3-- S.4---- | Petroleum products---Levy of sales tax |
Petroleum products---For the purposes of petroleum products the Petroleum Products (Development Surcharge) Ordinance, 1961 by virtue of its S.4 would have an overriding effect over the Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2013 PTD 379 (2013) 107 TAX 687 2013 PTCL 92 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, KARACHI |
Petroleum Products (Development Surcharge) Ordinance 1961 S.4 Sales Tax Act 1990 Sixth Sched., Item No.8 & S.3---S.R.O. 922(I) of 1999 dated 16-8-1999 | Petroleum products---Levy of sales tax |
Petroleum products---Levy of sales tax---Taxpayer not allowed to pass on such levy to end consumers---Validity---Ministry of Petroleum on 23-9-1999 prescribed a price structure notification authorizing the taxpayer to charge sales tax on furnace oil, while Read More... |
2013 PTD 379 (2013) 107 TAX 687 2013 PTCL 92 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S.36(3) | Recovery of tax |
Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Limitation---Show-cause notice was issued on 25-5-2001 and the Orders-in-Original were framed on 16-7-2001---Orders-in-Original were framed after 45 days from the date of show-cause notice---In Read More... |
2013 PTD 379 (2013) 107 TAX 687 2013 PTCL 92 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)- Sixth Sched., Item No. 8 & S.3---S.R.O. 922(I) of 1999 dated 16-8-1999--- | exemption /S.R.O. |
Petroleum products---Item No.8 of the Sixth Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990 had granted exemption to certain petroleum products---Such exemption was conferred by statute---On 16-8-1999 vide S.R.O. 922(I) of 1999 dated 16-8-1999 the said exemption was Read More... |
2013 PTD 379 (2013) 107 TAX 687 2013 PTCL 92 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) Ss.33 & 34 | Penalty and additional tax |
Penalty and additional tax---Scope---When the main levy failed the imposition of penalty or additional tax also Read More... |
2013 PTD 379 (2013) 107 TAX 687 2013 PTCL 92 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2013 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV VS M/S PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED |
Income Tax Ordinance 2001 S.171 | Refund for adjustment against tax liability |
Refund for adjustment against tax liability---Limitation---Refund would become due and stood determined on date of receipt of order passed by Appellate Authority including the Commissioner (Appeals) or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or the Supreme Read More... |
2013 PTD 368 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (INLAND REVENUE SERVICES) ZONE-IV |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.10, 3 & 4(1) (b) Customs Act 1969 Ss.24, 27 & 131 Sales Tax Rules, 2002, R.37 | Refund of input tax |
---Refund of input tax---Zero-rated exports---Interference in clearance of goods by Inland Revenue Department---Proper clearance of goods by customs authorities---Claim of refund, refusal of---Legality---Taxpayer company contended that supply of petroleum products Read More... |
2013 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (INLAND REVENUE SERVICES) ZONE-IV |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.45A(4), 4 & 11 Customs Act 1969, S.24 | Power of the Revenue Board |
Power of the Revenue Board and Collector of sales tax to call for records---Petroleum products---Zero-rated supplies made abroad to Airlines---Clearance of goods by Customs authorities---Assessment and levy of sales tax by the Commissioner Inland Revenue by Read More... |
2013 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (INLAND REVENUE SERVICES) ZONE-IV |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss.45A(4), 4 & 11 Customs Act 1969, S.24 Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.119 | Recovery of tax |
---Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Show cause notice based on change of opinion, and conjectures, not discharging burden of proof, in violation of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984---Validity---Show cause notice based on conjecturers Read More... |
2013 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (INLAND REVENUE SERVICES) ZONE-IV |
Sales Tax Law | Past practice |
Sales Tax-----Past practice---Order-in-original had been passed contrary to the past practice of many years which had been bypassed without obtaining permission of Federal Board of Read More... |
2013 PTD 353 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2013 |
Messrs SHELL (PAKISTAN) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (INLAND REVENUE SERVICES) ZONE-IV |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 3, 4(1), 4(1)(b), 24, 33, 34 | Offences and penalties |
Offences and penalties---No show cause notice---Validity---Penalty and additional tax was imposed without prior show cause notice while it was also not held that the conduct of the taxpayer was contumacious, mala fide, and Read More... |
2013 PTD 353 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2013 |
YAWAR BADAT, KARACHI AND ANOTHER VS OIR, U-8 AD-III (RTO), KARACHI AND ANOTHER |
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001) 122(1)(9), 120, 177, 37(5), 111 & 182 | Amendment of assessment/Adjustment of loss |
Amendment of assessment---Adjustment of loss of Association of Persons against salary income was disallowed; and addition from gain arising on sale of immovable properly (plot) treating the same as adventure in the nature of trade and income from undisclosed source Read More... |
2013 PTD 1121 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2008 |
FASTLINE (PVT.) LTD VS COLLECTOR CUSTOMS AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 7, 11, 33, 34 & 73 | Adjustment of input tax |
Adjustment of input tax---Certain discrepancies allegedly were found in the sales tax record of the taxpayer---Adjudication proceedings culminated on ex parte basis and taxpayer was proceeded in absentia without affording any opportunity of hearing, which was Read More... |
2008 PTD 905 |
|
Federal Tax Ombudsman | 2005 |
Messrs PACE INTERNATIONAL, RAWALPINDI
VS SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 11, 22 | Valuation Ruling |
Goods valuation---Revision---Provisional assessment--Petitioners / importers got their consignments released on provisional Read More... |
2005 PTD 340 2005 PTCL 836 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2003 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE COLLECTORATE through Assistant Collector of Sales Tax/E&C, Chunian Division, Lahore VS Messrs ALNOOR BULBS (PVT.) LTD. and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 26 | Amnesty Scheme immunity from taxation & foreign assets |
Constitutional petition---Capital Value Tax-Foreign assets of tax resident-Vires---Pith and substance, rule of Read More... |
2023 PTD 268 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
BROTHERS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED through General Manager Finance VS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SALES TAX, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and 2 others |
Sales Tax Special Order, 1998 | Special Auditors | Appointment of Terms |
Sales Tax General Order No. 1, dated 7-1-1999 Sales tax General Order No. 09 of 1999, dated 22-09-1999 S.R.O. No. 206(I)/2001, dated 2-4-2001 Read More... |
2002 PTD 387 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
OLYMPIA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE & SALES TAX; SHEIKHUPURA DIVISION, LAHORE and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 2(31; A) , 19 | Registration under Sales Tax Act |
Constitutional petition---Registration under Sales Tax Act, 1990-Maintaining of godown outside factory premises---Petitioner being manufacturer of man-made synthetic carpets was registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990--- Petitioner for Read More... |
2002 PTD 776 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs EVICRETE LIMITED through Chairman
VS CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (KARACHI BENCH) and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46, 46(4) | Interim order by the High Court / Interim orders by any other forum |
Constitutional petition Recovery of revenue Interim order passed by person other than the High Court Provision of Art. 199(4A) of the Read More... |
2002 PTD 403 86 TAX 193 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 33, 56 | Show-cause notice / Non-filing of tax return |
Non-filing of tax return---Show-cause notice--- Service---Effectiveness---Penalty---Show-cause notice for non-filing of tax return was sent through registered post which was not received back undelivered---Penalty for non-filing of tax return was imposed on the Read More... |
2002 PTD 822 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs RAMNA FITTINGS AND PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director, Lahore
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) .3(1)(a), 2(16), 2(35) , 6(1), (a), (b) ,& (e) | Manufacture†or “ Produce |
Manufacture or “ Produce” Section 2(16) cls.(b) & (c) of the Sale Read More... |
2002 PTD 470 85 TAX 171 2002 PTCL 37 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(b), 10 , 8, 7(2) , 10(2) | Stock-in-trade |
Stock-in-trade Definition of term "stock-in-trade" as goods and commodities purchased for sale or conversion into finished goods was an Read More... |
2002 PTD 475 2001 PTCL 528 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs RAMNA FITTINGS AND PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director, Lahore
VS COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) .3(1)(a), 2(16), 2(35) , 6(1), (a), (b) ,& (e) | Taxable activity |
Manufacture or Produce /Section 2 (16) cls.(b) & (c) of the Sale Tax Act, 1990 are not to be read independently but rather to be read as part of or in continuance of cl.(a) Processes mentioned in cls. (b) Read More... |
2002 PTD 470 85 TAX 171 2002 PTCL 37 |
|
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan | 2002 |
ATLAS TYRES (PVT.) LIMITED
VS COLLECTOR, SALES TAX and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 13 | Exemption--Components and parts of vehicles |
Components and parts of vehicles--Tyres and tubes for motor cars, motorcycles and scooters--- Exemption from payment of sales tax on tyres Read More... |
2002 PTD 495 86 TAX 77 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs HASEEB WAQAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED through Chief Executive
VS THE COLLECTOR, SALES TAX, LAHORE and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46, 47 | Condonation of delay in filing appeal |
Condonation of delay in filing appeal---Appellate Tribunal Read More... |
2002 PTD 506 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE
VS Messrs HOECHST RAVI CHEMICALS LIMITED |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 10, 10(1) | Refund/ carried forward |
Refund was refused to be adjusted being not pertaining to the tax period Validity Excess amount of input tax was not only confined to a tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 508 85 TAX 492 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
SUPER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD
VS CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 13(1), 33, 34 , 36 | Exemption/ principle of consistency |
Petitioners were engaged in manufacturing Brake Linings Sets and Brake Lining Rolls---Such goods prior to 3-7-1994 were subject to payment of sales tax, but were exempted from tax after amendment of S.R.O 555(I)/94 vide S.R.O. Read More... |
2002 PTD 955 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
SUPER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD
VS CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 13(1), 33, 34 , 36 | Legislation/ Fiscal and Tax Laws |
Fiscal and tax laws, drafting of---Every law particularly the law pertaining to fiscal matters and taxes are required to be unambiguous and clear---Lacunas in drafting of such law may have far-reaching effect---Draftsman concerned with Read More... |
2002 PTD 955 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
SUPER INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD
VS CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 13(1), 33, 34 , 36 | principle of consistency |
Revenue' could not be allowed shifting of versions in respect of same Product with mere change in law pertaining to pertaining to taxability thereof. (e) Sales tax----Revenue should be consistent in Read More... |
2002 PTD 955 |
|
QUETTA HIGH COURT | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others VS Messrs BALCHEM (PVT.) LTD., BALOCHISTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47, 46, 2(33)(41)(44), 33 , 34 | Question of law |
Assessee was exempt from sales tax up to 30-6-1996 vide S.R.O. No.580(1)/91---Demand of sales tax by Authority on goods supplied after 30-6-1996---Tribunal found such demand to be exempt under said S.R.O.---Objection of assessee with Read More... |
2002 PTD 967 87 TAX 247 |
|
QUETTA HIGH COURT | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others VS Messrs BALCHEM (PVT.) LTD., BALOCHISTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47, 46, 2(33)(41)(44), 33 , 34 | Time of supply |
Assessee-company was exempt from sales tax up to 30-6-1991 vide S.R.O. No.580(I)/91---Show-cause notice to assesse in respect of sales tax on goods supplied after 30-6-1996- Tribunal discharged such notice holding that goods manufactured Read More... |
2002 PTD 967 87 TAX 247 |
|
QUETTA HIGH COURT | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others VS Messrs BALCHEM (PVT.) LTD., BALOCHISTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47, 46, 2(33)(41)(44), 33 , 34 | Promissory estoppel |
Promissory estoppel, doctrine of---Application--Where Government functionaries made promises and representation to anyone, who believed and acted under them, then such functionaries would be precluded from acting to the detriment of such Read More... |
2002 PTD 967 87 TAX 247 |
|
QUETTA HIGH COURT | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and others VS Messrs BALCHEM (PVT.) LTD., BALOCHISTAN |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47, 46, 2(33)(41)(44), 33 , 34 | Supply |
Sale of fixed assets---Chargeability to tax---Tribunal had found that no sales tax was leviable on disposal of fixed assets owned by assessees, since they were not trading in the items they had sold---Contention of the Authority was that Read More... |
2002 PTD 967 87 TAX 247 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX
VS Messrs MUNAF LACE and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 47 | Issues raised before tribunal |
Only such question of law could be raised before High Court in appeal/reference which had been agitated/raised before Appellate Tribunal and findings thereon had been given by the Tribunal----Points not raised before the Tribunal could not be allowed to be raised Read More... |
2002 PTD 1033 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
VS METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 7 | Refund |
Claim for refund of tax which was not payable or was paid in excess, could only be made by the person paying the tax and not the one who had Read More... |
2002 PTD 87 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
VS METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 7 | Adjustment |
Determination of tax liability---Assessee was entitled to deduct the input tax paid by him from the output tax payable for the purpose of Read More... |
2002 PTD 87 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
VS METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 7 | Service of summons |
Service of summons---Irregularity---Effect---Any irregularity in the service of summons does not vitiate a decree and service through a Court Read More... |
2002 PTD 87 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
VS METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 7 | Void order/ voidable order/ Limitation |
Void order---Limitation---No limitation urns against a void order which is non-existent in the eyes of law and which Read More... |
2002 PTD 87 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
VS METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3B, 7 | Public functionaries |
Public functionaries and Read More... |
2002 PTD 87 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs FAMY LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX |
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX 28 | Service of notice/ jurisdictional notice |
Service of notice---Question of fact---Primarily the question pertaining to service of notice of a party is a question of fact, but when an issue Read More... |
2002 PTD 102 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs FAMY LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX |
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX 28 | Finding of fact |
If any Court or Tribunal Read More... |
2002 PTD 102 |
|
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan | 2002 |
LASER PARAXIS DEPLIEX CLINIC, LAHORE
VS CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE BENCH, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46, 46(2) | Condonation of delay/ Indolent appellant |
Power under Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Limitation Act, 1908----Comparison---Power conferred upon Tribunal under S.46(2) of the Sales Tax Act, Read More... |
2002 PTD 549 85 TAX 18 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs FAMY LTD VS COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX |
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX 28 | Judicial finding/ judicial order |
Judicial finding---Every judicial finding should be based on reasons containing the justification for finding in the order itself. Read More... |
2002 PTD 102 |
|
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan | 2002 |
LASER PARAXIS DEPLIEX CLINIC, LAHORE
VS CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE BENCH, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46, 46(2) | Condonation of delay/ Exclusion of time taken in proceedings |
Exclusion of time taken in proceedings bona fide in Court without jurisdiction----Jurisdiction of Tribunal----Scope----Although there are no Read More... |
2002 PTD 549 85 TAX 18 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Taxable supplies/input tax adjustment |
Provisions of S.8(1)(a)(b), Sales Tax Act, 1990 are restrictive in nature and restrictions so placed are given in cls. (a) & (b) of Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Produce/Taxable supply |
“Produce”---Connotation---Process of embossing---Anything which directly contributes to the production of a taxable supply falls Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Tax liability |
Tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
Mohiuddin Siddiqui VS Ghulam, Appraiser |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 8(1)(a)(b) , 8 , 2(16) ,7 | Tax liability/ Input tax adjustment |
Input tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 111 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
Messrs KEEP & CARRY COMPANY
VS DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ADJUDICATION), SALES TAX and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 46 | Condonation of delay |
Tribunal dismissed the appeal after Read More... |
2002 PTD 608 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LTD. through Secretary
VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, ISLAMABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 45(3), 2(16), 3 | Jurisdiction of High Court |
Constitutional jurisdiction of High Read More... |
2002 PTD 609 86 TAX 110 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LTD. through Secretary
VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, ISLAMABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 45(3), 2(16), 3 | Constitutional petition/ Maintainability |
Fiscal controversies--Resolving of Read More... |
2002 PTD 609 86 TAX 110 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LTD. through Secretary
VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, ISLAMABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 45(3), 2(16), 3 | Withdrawal of appeal |
Petitioner filed appeal before the Read More... |
2002 PTD 609 86 TAX 110 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LTD. through Secretary
VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, ISLAMABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 45(3), 2(16), 3 | Manufacture/ produce/ Defined-Terms |
Terms "manufacture" or Read More... |
2002 PTD 609 86 TAX 110 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
FAUJI CEMENT COMPANY LTD. through Secretary
VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, ISLAMABAD and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 45, 45(3), 2(16), 3 | Lime stone |
Constitutional petition Sales tax, Read More... |
2002 PTD 609 86 TAX 110 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PREMIER DISTRIBUTORS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 13, 3(1) , 13(1), 241 | availing alternate remedy/Petition/ Exemption |
Constitutional petition ---Rule of availing alternate remedy available under the law before filing Constitutional petition --- Not absolute Read More... |
2002 PTD 654 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PREMIER DISTRIBUTORS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 13, 3(1) , 13(1), 241 | Judgement of high court |
Effect of impugned SROs were earlier considered by High Court in Case of Messrs. Wily Food Read More... |
2002 PTD 654 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PREMIER DISTRIBUTORS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 13, 3(1) , 13(1), 241 | Judgement of high court |
Effect of impugned SROs were earlier considered by High Court in Case of Messrs. Wily Food Read More... |
2002 PTD 654 |
|
Karachi High Court | 2002 |
Messrs PREMIER DISTRIBUTORS
VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 13, 3(1) , 13(1), 241 | Exemption/Show Cause Notice/ petition |
SRO No.580/1/91, dated 27-6-1991--SRO No.561 (1)/94, died 9.6-1994-Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Art. 199-Show-cause notice Demand of Read More... |
2002 PTD 654 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 3, 6 ,7 ,34 | Sale of plant and machinery, vehicles, |
Scope of tax----Tax was Read More... |
2002 PTD 300 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
INTERNATIONAL BEVERAGES (PVT.) LTD VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Additional Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Central Board of Revenue), Karachi and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (III of 1951) 2, 2(12) , 27(1) | Refund of sales tax Term |
Refund of sales tax Term “subject to the tax” as used in S. 2(12) of Sales Tax Act, 1951 with reference to exemption or Read More... |
2002 PTD 311 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2002 |
INTERNATIONAL BEVERAGES (PVT.) LTD VS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Additional Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Central Board of Revenue), Karachi and 2 others |
Sales Tax Act (III of 1951) 2, 2(12) , 27(1) | Partly manufactured goods |
The definition of ‘partly manufactured goods’ is that they are goods which are to be incorporated into another article. So, these Read More... |
2002 PTD 311 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2002 |
VS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) 5(b) , Sixth Sched | Exemption/ Demand raised |
S. 5(b) & Sixth Sched. S.R.O. No. 922(1)/99, dated 16-08-1999 Customs Act, 1969, Ss. 32(2) & 79(2)(4) Change in the rate of tax Read More... |
2002 PTD 329 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
FECTO BELARUS TRACTORS LIMITED
VS PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance Economic Affairs and another |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S.3/ Notification S.R.O. No. 1189(1)/94, dated 11-12-1994 | Exemption, withdrawal of |
Exemption, withdrawal of/ Sales tax, levy of/ Import of tractors was exempted from payment of sales tax vide Notification S.R.O. No. 1189(1)94, dated 11-12-1994/ Petitioner had concluded the contract with the-exporter in respect of the imported goods and letter of Read More... |
2001 PTD 1829 84 TAX 25 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE AND OTHERS VS MESSRS RIAZ BOTTLERS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S.3 | Retail price/ Fixation of/ chilling charges |
Retail price/ Fixation of/ Procedure/ Levy of Central Excise Duty/ Inclusion of chilling charges in retail price of aerated water/juices for recovery of excise duty/ Authorities included such charges while recovering central excise duty/ Manufacturers Read More... |
2001 PTD 1854 2004 PTCL 298 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2001 |
DIVISIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX and another
VS BHERAGHAT MINERAL INDUSTRIES |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) . | Manufacture/ Crushing dolomite lumps into†chips and powder |
Manufacture/ Crushing dolomite lumps into” chips and powder/ Not a process of manufacture/ No new commercial commodity produced/ Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (2 of 1959), S.2(j), (r)(ii)/ Notification No.3326-1381/V-ST, dated October 11, 1977/ Read More... |
2001 PTD 1908 246 ITR 230 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
Messrs SYED BHAIS VS CHAIRMAN, C.B.R. AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 3 | Doctrine of “promissory estoppel" |
Sales tax, recovery of/ Doctrine of “promissory estoppel” and vested right/ when not applicable/ Where the import had taken decisive step and opened the letters of credit before the withdrawal of exemption, the importer could not be asked to pay sales Read More... |
2001 PTD 2167 83 TAX 388 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SALT MINES, KHEWRA, JHELUM VS SECRETARY, C.B.R, ISLAMABAD AND 2 OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (III of 1951) S. 7/ S.R.O. 9(1)83, dated 5-1-1983 | Exemption/ Tax already paid on the Sulphur |
Customs General Order, dated 10-9-1986/ Manufacture of Blasting Powder/ Chargeability to sales tax/ Exemption/ Tax already paid on the Sulphur, a component of blasting powder was deductible from the sales tax of the manufactured powder. Sales tax on the Read More... |
2001 PTD 2215 239 ITR 700 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2001 |
SAPHIRE ENERGY LIMITED AND 10 OTHERS
VS PAKISTAN AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990) S. 13 | Exemption of Sales tax / Discretion of Government |
Exemption of sales tax and customs duty/ Discretion of Government/ Grant of exemption was a discretionary relief and Authority could or could not grant such relief in respect of any goods or class of goods and could great exemption on any terms and conditions Read More... |
2001 PTD 2234 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue |
Messrs R.M. GULISTAN ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. VS The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEAL courtS-IV), KARACHI |
Sales Tax Act, 1990 11,32,36,36(1),36(2) | Evasion of duty and taxes |
Evasion of duty and taxes in respect of sales tax---Recovery of short paid amount of sales tax---Issuance of show-cause notices---Registered persons, were alleged for short payment of duty and taxes on import of Seamless Steel Pipes/Tubes and the goods Read More... |
2016 PTD 1957 |