Court | Year | Petitioner | Law/Section | Topic | Case Law | Citation/Ref. | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS NOOR UL HAQ THROUGH ABDUL SAMAD VS THE GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BALOCHISTAN AN 2 OTHERS |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act (VII of 2015) Ss.14 & 53 Balochistan Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2018, Rr.1(4) & 3 | Project Director - recovery proceedings for tax not withheld |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act (VII of 2015)---Ss.14 & 53---Balochistan Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2018, Rr.1(4) & 3---Taxing statute---Applicability---Sale tax, recovery of---Scope---Petitioner company was aggrieved of notice issued Read More... |
2024 PTD 342 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS NOOR UL HAQ THROUGH ABDUL SAMAD VS THE GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BALOCHISTAN AN 2 OTHERS |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act 2015 Ss.14 & 53 Balochistan Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2018, Rr.1(4) & 3 | withholding agent |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act (VII of 2015)---Ss.14 & 53---Balochistan Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2018, Rr.1(4) & 3---Taxing statute---Applicability---Sale tax, recovery of---Scope---Petitioner company was aggrieved of notice issued Read More... |
2024 PTD 342 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS NOOR UL HAQ THROUGH ABDUL SAMAD VS THE GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BALOCHISTAN AN 2 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Retrospective effect |
Interpretation of statutes----Retrospective effect---Scope---Statute, which is procedural in nature, can operate retrospectively unless it affects an existing right on the date of promulgation or causes injustice or prejudice to a substantive right---If such statute Read More... |
2024 PTD 342 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
MESSRS CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND OTHERS
VS THE GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS |
Balochistan Sales Tax on Services Act 2015 2(14),2(86),6,7 | Sales tax on service | Economic activity |
Balochistan Sales Tax on Services Act (VI of 2015)---Ss.2(14), 2(86), 6 & 7---Sales tax on service---Rate---Economic activity---Petitioners/contractors assailed notifications charging sales tax on services and goods---Validity---Rates in question gave two Read More... |
2024 PTD 331 |
|
Balochistan High Court | 2024 |
Messrs SARA ENTERPRISES GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS through Proprietor
VS SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA and 2 others |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015 S.4(2)(a) | Nova constitutio futuris |
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act (VII of 2015)---S. 4(2)(a) & Preamble---Prospective/Retrospective application of a new law---Scope---Payment of works, done in the year 1998, by the petitioner (government contractor) was finally decreed in the year 2019, Read More... |
2024 PTD 196 2024 PLD 13 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SINDH REVENUE BOARD through Secretary Government of Sindh, Karachi and others
VS Messrs QUICK FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED and others |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 Sec. 5 | services of the employees to the employer |
Section 5 of the Sindh Sales Tax on Service Act, 2011 (‘the Act’), being the charging provision, is a substantive provision and has a direct nexus to the taxable event provided for under Section 4 which particularly excludes the services of the employees Read More... |
2023 PTD 1419 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2023 |
SINDH REVENUE BOARD through Secretary Government of Sindh, Karachi and others
VS Messrs QUICK FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED and others |
Interpretation of statutes- Sindh Sales Tax on Service Act, 2011 (‘the Act’), Sec. 5 | Delegated legislation/Rules framed under a statute |
Delegated legislation—Delegated legislation is intended to enforce the law and advance the purpose of the underlying legislature, without overriding it and while minutiae could be filled in, the parent statute could neither be added to nor subtracted Read More... |
2023 PTD 1419 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
M/S SHAKARGANJ FOODS PRODUCT (PVT.) LTD. VS COMMISSIONER PRA, FAISALABAD |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act (XLII of 2012) 14, 32, 60 | Pecuniary Jurisdiction |
Appellant assailed order passed by Commissioner on the ground that show cause notice was issued by Additional Commissioner but the order was passed by Read More... |
2022 PTD 320 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2022 |
M/S SHAKARGANJ FOODS PRODUCT (PVT.) LTD. VS COMMISSIONER PRA, FAISALABAD |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act (XLII of 2012) 14, 32, 60 | Appellant Assailed Order |
Special procedure and tax withholding provisions---Retention and production of records and documents---Scope---Appellant assailed order passed Read More... |
2022 PTD 320 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2021 |
MESSRS SAMAMA STAR CONSTRUCTION CO., ISLAMABAD
VS THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, ISLAMABAD |
Islamabad Capital Territory (Tax on Services) Ordinance 2001 S.3-Sales Tax Act 1990 Ss. 2(35) & 14 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R.6 | Taxable activity-Compulsory Registration |
Taxable activity-Compulsory Registration-Scope---Appellant assailed order passed by Commissioner Inland Revenue whereby it was compulsorily registered---Validity- Appellant had purchased land/immovable property in the name of the registered partnership firm for use Read More... |
2021 PTD 89 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
MESSRS IZHAR CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LAHORE |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 24, 57 | Non-production of documents |
Obligation to produce documents and provide information--Non-production of documents---Effect- Show-cause notice was issued to the appellant for providing construction services to Civil Aviation Authority under a contract- Despite Read More... |
2021 PTD 270 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S MILLENIUM FRANCHISES VS COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LHR |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act (XLII of 2012) Ss. 24 & 2(43) | Tax fraud |
Show-cause notice issued to the appellant alleged that it being franchisee was required to declare its true sales but such information was concealed which act was "tax fraud"--Additional Commissioner held the appellant liable for evasion of sales tax---Appeal Read More... |
2021 PTD 329 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S MILLENIUM FRANCHISES VS COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LHR |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 Ss. 24 & 2(43) | Scope of tax and allied matters |
Assessment of tax, tax fraud, taxable service, scope of tax and allied matters, time manner and mode of payment, return---Non-mentioning of relevant provisions of law (subsections) in the show-cause notice---Effect----Show-cause notice issued to the appellant Read More... |
2021 PTD 329 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
FRIGZ FOODS SIALKOT CANTT VS COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LAHORE |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 Ss. 24, 63 & 65 & Punjab Sales Tax on Services (Adjudication and Appeals) Rules, 2012, Rr. 9 & 16 | Decision in appeal/ Examination of records, evidences |
Assessment of tax-Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals)-Decision in appeal-Examination of records, evidences-Duty of Commissioner (Appeals)-Scope-Show-cause notice issued to the appellant alleged that it being franchisee had deposited certain amounts in the Bank account Read More... |
2021 PTD 443 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
FRIGZ FOODS SIALKOT CANTT VS COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LAHORE |
Punjab Revenue Authority Act (XLIII of 2012) Ss. 3, 5 & 36 | Powers and functions of validation |
Punjab Revenue Authority, powers and functions of Validation--Scope-Show---cause notice issued to the appellant alleged that it being franchisee had deposited certain amounts in the Bank account of the franchiser on account of royalty and advertisement, Read More... |
2021 PTD 443 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
FATIMA FERTILIZER COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER VS COMMISSIONER-II, SINDH REVENUE BOARD |
Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S. 9, 13(3), 2(63) & 63. Sindh Finance Act 2019, S. 60(i) | Sales tax on services/ Person liable to pay tax special provisions |
Sales tax on services --Person liable to pay tax Special provisions and tax withholding provisions Person withholding tax to be considered "person liable to pay tax" Retrospective effect of S.13(3) of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 Scope- Question before High Read More... |
2021 PTD 484 | (2021) 123 TAX 122 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2021 |
FATIMA FERTILIZER COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER VS COMMISSIONER-II, SINDH REVENUE BOARD |
Interpretation of statutes | Effect of amendment in fiscal statute |
Fiscal statute-Construction of -- Effect of amendment in fiscal statute Principles - Interpretation of fiscal statute had to be made strictly and any doubts arising therefrom must be resolved in favour of Amendments introduced in taxpayer and even if two reasonable Read More... |
2021 PTD 484 | (2021) 123 TAX 122 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED (ZTBL) VS COMMISSIONER HQ (PRA) LAHORE |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 Ss. 14 & 19 | Joint and several liabilities of registered persons |
Special procedure and tax withholding provisions---Joint and several liabilities of registered persons where tax unpaid---Scope---Appellant assailed the order passed by Commissioner whereby it was taxed---Validity---Commissioner was bound to have passed a goods Read More... |
2021 PTD 986 |
|
Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2021 |
M/S ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED (ZTBL) VS COMMISSIONER HQ (PRA) LAHORE |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 Ss. 14 & 19 | Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal/ Limitation |
Limitation---Condonation of delay---Scope---Appellant sought condonation of delay in filing appeal---Validity---Nowhere in the impugned order it was mentioned or directed that the copy of the said order be transmitted to the appellant---Neither the copy of the Read More... |
2021 PTD 986 |
|
Sindh Revenue Board Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s JSN TRADERS, HYDERABAD VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB, KARACHI |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (II of 2011) 3, 4, 24B | Distribution Services |
Words "Distributor, Sale, Supply Chain and Taxable Supply have not been defined in the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011. Whereas all these words are Read More... |
2020 PTD 54 |
|
Sindh Revenue Board Appellate Tribunal | 2020 |
M/s JSN TRADERS, HYDERABAD VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB, KARACHI |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (II of 2011) 3, 4, 24B | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT |
11. Now, for the purpose of understanding the meaning of the tariff heading 9845.0000 "supply chain management or distribution (including deliver) services" of Read More... |
2020 PTD 54 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS SYSTECH ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS (PVT.) LIMITED VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SRB AND ANOTHER |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (II of 2011) 43, 59(5) | Penalty |
This Tribunal in its various Orders relying upon the various pronouncements of Superior Courts, held that penalty cannot be imposed without Read More... |
2020 PTD 156 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2020 |
MESSRS SYSTECH ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS (PVT.) LIMITED VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SRB AND ANOTHER |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (II of 2011) 43, 59(5) | Penalty for Non-filing of Monthly Returns |
It is noted that in this case, the default of non-filing of monthly returns pertains to 13 returns for the months of December 2014 to February Read More... |
2020 PTD 156 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
WATEEN TELECOM LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY VS SINDH THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S. 28 Civil Procedure Code 1908 O. XXXIX Rr. 1 & 2 | Conduct of Audit proceedings |
Conduct of Audit proceedings under S. 28 of the Sindh Sales Tax On Services Act, 2011---Application for grant of interim injunction- Scope---Exercise of discretion of Deputy Commissioner to make selection of taxpayer for audit-Reasons for such selection to be Read More... |
2019 PTD 1030 (2019)120 TAX 244 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2019 |
WATEEN TELECOM LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY VS SINDH THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S. 28 Civil Procedure Code 1908 O. XXXIX Rr. 1 & 2 | Public Functionary/ Exercise of statutory powers |
Exercise of statutory powers by public functionaries---Exercise of discretion by public functionaries/public bodies---Scope---Law recognized no such thing as unfettered discretion and all discretionary powers, especially those conferred by statute, must be exercised Read More... |
2019 PTD 1030 (2019)120 TAX 244 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS M/S. GOLDEN PEARL COSMETICS |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act (XLII of 2012) Ss. 1(4), 3,4 & Sched.---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss. 11 & 47 Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act (X of 2010), Preamble--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 270AA(6) & 264 Punjab Sales Tax on Service (Withholding) Rules, 2015, R. 7---Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2007, R.2(3A)--- | sales tax on services (withholding) |
Sales Tax on services---Deduction of Sales Tax on advertisement services---Declaration and continuance of laws---Conflict of Federal and Provincial Laws after the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010)---Effect of Art.270AA(6) of the Constitution on Federal Read More... |
2017 PTD 1485 (2017)116 TAX 321 2018 PTCL 72 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS M/S. GOLDEN PEARL COSMETICS |
Interpretation of statues | Implied repeal, doctrine |
Implied repeal, doctrine of---Applicability---Scope---Essential condition for implied repeal was that when a provision of a former statute was inconsistent and in conflict with the provision of a later statute and the two could not be reconciled or harmonized, so as Read More... |
2017 PTD 1485 (2017)116 TAX 321 2018 PTCL 72 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
SINDH REVENUE BOARD VS M/S MEESSAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S.61 | Appeal/Limitation/ defaulting party could not be rewarded for its default |
Appeal by Sindh Revenue Board----Government departments/functionaries---Statutory periods for filing of appeal---Scope----Government departments could not be extended different treatment in respect of legal provisions---Procedure provided Read More... |
2018 PTD 1827 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
M/S. INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE
VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statute | Delegated legislation |
Delegated legislation----Tax could not be levied automatically through a delegated legislation until and unless it was leviable under the charging provision of the fiscal Read More... |
2018 PTD 1869 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
M/S. INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE
VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH AND OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance 2000 S.3 & Sched., Item No.2 | Television channels/Sales tax on advertisements |
Short payment of sales tax---Recovery of short paid amount along with default surcharge and penalty---Dispute between the petitioner (company owning certain television channels) and the tax department was over the issue of payment of Read More... |
2018 PTD 1869 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
M/S. INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE
VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Rules made in furtherance of fiscal statute |
Words and expressions in a given law were to be assigned simple, plain and easily deductible meaning for the purpose of understanding their scope and object. |
2018 PTD 1869 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
M/S. INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE
VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH AND OTHERS |
Sales Tax Act 1990 S. 3 | Sales tax was an indirect tax, burden of which was to be borne by the end consumer |
Sales tax was an indirect tax, burden of which was to be borne by the end consumer---After such burden had been passed on to the end user and the amount was so collected, it became duty of the vendor to pass on the same to the government Read More... |
2018 PTD 1869 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/s DH Travels VS COMMISSIONER ENFORCEMENT & OTHERS |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 S.52 Civil Procedure Code 1908 S. 11 | Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied/Res judicata/Second Notice & Order |
The doctrine was applicable to proceedings under S.52 of the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012. Read More... |
2018 PTD 657 (2018)118 TAX 316 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2018 |
M/s DH Travels VS COMMISSIONER ENFORCEMENT & OTHERS |
Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act 2012 S.52 Civil Procedure Code 1908 S. 11 | Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied/Res judicata/Second Notice & Order |
The doctrine was applicable to proceedings under S.52 of the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012. |
2018 PTD 657 (2018)118 TAX 316 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
KARACHI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
VS SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 Ss. 47-A & 52 Sales Tax Act 1990 S.11-A | attachment of Bank accounts/ Notice of recovery |
Petitioner company was aggrieved of notice issued by authorities and attachment of its Bank accounts. |
2018 PTD 936 2018 PTCL 823 |
|
Sindh Revenue Board Appellate Tribunal | 2018 |
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB VS M/S. ELIXIR SECURITIES PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED |
Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance 2000 Ss. 23, 43 & 76(1) | Correction of clerical and arithmetical errors |
Registered person, was as a stock broker rendering, management services and advisory consultancy services---Receipts from various services declared in the final statement, on the basis of which Assistant Commissioner, issued a show-cause notice, confronting the Read More... |
2018 PTD 1068 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
ASSOCIATION OF BUILDING & DEVELOPER OF PAKISTAN VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Charging provision |
Interpretation of a charging provision in a fiscal statute, favourable to taxpayer is to be Read More... |
2018 PTD 1487 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2018 |
ASSOCIATION OF BUILDING & DEVELOPER OF PAKISTAN VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S.2 (79)(96), 3(c)(d) Second Sched., Heading No. 9807.0000, 9814.3000 & 9824.0000 Transfer of Property Act 1882 S.54 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Tax on services/ Construction industry |
Petitioners were related to construction industry in one way or the other and they were aggrieved of notices issued by authorities for recovery of tax under Tariff Heading Nos. 9807.0000, 9814.3000 & 9824.000 of Second Schedule, Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, Read More... |
2018 PTD 1487 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
Water & Power Development Authority VS Excise and TAX ation Department, Government of the Punjab & others |
Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Act of 1958 S.16(4) Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.165, 98, 157, 90, 154, 153 & Fourth Sched | Certain public property |
Water and Power and Development Authority Act of 1958 Ss. 3, 21 & Preamble---Constitutional exemption of certain public property from taxation under Art. 165 of the Constitution---Property owned by, and in use of, Water and Power Development Authority Read More... |
2017 PTD 517 |
|
Peshawar High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA (KPK) THROUGH SECRETARY LAW, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR AND 4 OTHERS |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Finance Act 2013 S.19 & Sch.II Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.142 & 199 | Taxable Service/Constitutional validity |
Taxable Service---Constitutional validity---Maintainability of a Constitutional petition against taxing/fiscal statutory provisions on ground of unreasonableness, hardship or being excessive or discriminatory vis-à-vis rate of said tax being different in other Read More... |
2017 PTD 1359 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes |
(j) Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act of 2011--- S. 3---Constitutional of Pakistan, Art. 70 (4), Fourth Schedule, Federal Legislative List entry 53---Vires of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011---Levy of taxes---Terminal taxes---Power of Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
MEHAR PERVAIZ AKHTAR VS DIRECTOR GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION, LAHORE AND OTHERS |
Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Act (V of 1958) Ss. 10, 4, 8, 9 14 & 15---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Recovery of property tax---Valuation of property |
Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Rules, 1958, Rr. 7, 11 & 10---Recovery of property tax---Valuation of property---Objections of taxpayers---Exemption---Adjudication of objections by authorities---Communication of reasons to taxpayer(s) Scope---Petitioner Read More... |
2017 PTD 1962 |
|
Sindh Revenue Board Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, UNIT-4, SRB. VS M/S. OPTIMUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (PVT.) LIMITED. |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (XII of 2011) Ss. 43 & 44 | Failure to pay Sales Tax |
Failure to pay Sales Tax---Words “knowingly” and “fraudulently” occurring in S.43, Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011---Meaning---Imposition of penalty---Taxpayer who was engaged in providing/rendering taxable services chargeable to Sales Tax was alleged Read More... |
2017 PTD 2108 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
THE COLLECTOR, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE & 2 OTHERS VS M/S. NAVEENA INDUSTRIES LTD. & OTHERS |
Sindh Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962) S. 7 [as amended by Sindh Civil Courts (Amendment) Act (III of 2010)] Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.9 | Suit before High Court |
Suit before High Court--- Original Civil while trying a civil suit on its original side exercises same power as of a civil court as vested in District Judge in terms of S.7 of Sindh Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962--- Restrictions and qualification imposed in terms of Read More... |
2017 PTD 2123 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
ORIENT ELECTRONIC (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER VS GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE KARACHI |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S. 63 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Maintainability |
Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Sales tax on services---Show-cause notice, issuance of---Scope---Petitioner raised all the legal grounds including the one with regard to legality of show cause notice but could not succeed before the forums provided under Read More... |
2017 PTD 2197 |
|
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal | 2017 |
RESOURCE MARKING CONSULTANTS VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (UNIT-16), SRB, KARACHI |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 S. 43 Second sched. | Event Management Services |
Levy of sales tax for short payment, default surcharge and penalty---Taxpayer was a registered person engaged in providing or rendering “Event Management Services---Allegation against the taxpayer was that he had provided Event Management Services but failed to Read More... |
2017 PTD 2280 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Taxation | Fundamentals |
Fiscal statutes---Fundamentals---Taxing event is fundamental to all fiscal statutes---Such statutes are necessarily a manifestation or exercise of a taxing power constitutionally vesting in appropriate legislature---Taxing event lies at the heart of such power Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of Constitution | Fundamentals |
Concurrent taxing power---Scope---No concurrent taxing power in Pakistan---Only a division exists and there is no sharing of taxing powers---Concurrent legislative List does not contain any entry relating to a taxing power. Taxing event can be described as a levy Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 268(1) | Vires of statute |
Term ‘existing laws’---Scope---Existing law had to be considered simply as a law in its own right and its pith and substance determined---If pith and substance was relatable to any entry on Federal Legislative List or the Concurrent Legislative Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Vires of statute |
Vires of statute---Principle---If a challenge as to the vires of a statue fails on one ground that itself precludes a subsequent challenge on another Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance of 2000 S.3 Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 160 | Levy of tax |
Levy of tax---Province, power of---National Finance Commission (NFC) Award---Object, scope and purpose---NFC Award makes recommendations under Art. 160(2) of the constitution regarding distribution between the Federation and the Provinces of tax revenues mentioned Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Interpretation of Constitution | Exception |
Exception---Scope---“Exception” has to be given proper meaning and effect---To impute redundancy to even a statutory provision or to so interpret a statute that a part of it is rendered futile or nugatory is a strong thing---Such approach would be almost Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan---- Art. 70 (4), Fourth Schedule, Federal Legislative List, entry 49 [as amended by S. 101 of Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act (X of 2010)] | Federal legislative list |
Exception---Scope---Exception added to entry No. 49 of Federal Legislative List is not a ‘true’ exception, as such it is an independent provision in its own right and has two primary effect---Exception recognizes expressly on the Constitutional plane that a Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act of 2011--- S. 3--- Constitutional of Pakistan, Art. 70 (4), Fourth Schedule, Federal Legislative List entry 53---Vires of Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011 | Levy of Taxes |
Levy of taxes---Terminal taxes---Power of Provinces---Scope---Provisions of Sindh Sales Tax on Service Act, 2011, has encroached and directly trenched upon a legislative field reserved exclusively for the Federation---No doubt on the definitions as Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Federal Excise of 2005--- ---S.3, First Schedule, Table II---Central Excise Act (I of 1944), S.3---Sindh Sales Tax Act (XII of 2011), S.3---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199, 270AA (7), Fourth Schedule, Federal List, entries Nos. 44, 49 & 53 [as amended by Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act of 2010)] | Power to impose a levy |
Constitutional petition---Vires of provisions of Sindh Sales Tax Act, 2011 and Federal Excise Act, 2005---Suspension of judgment---Effect---Petitioner company assailed vires of levy of excise duties by Provincial Government---Validity---Power to impose a levy on Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT OF FORWARD ASSOCIATION VS PROVINCE OF SINDH AND OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art, 199 | High Court Judgment |
High Court judgment, specially in exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution, can operate at two levels: Firstly it operate in personam, i.e. in relation to persons party to petition and secondly it can have effect throughout the Province not only Read More... |
2017 PTD 1 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2017 |
SINDH REVENUE BOARD THROUGH ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER VS ASKARI BANK LTD |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act 2011 Ss. 24, 44 & 63 | Amendment of default surcharge |
Reference---Amount of default surcharge---Deletion---Factual controversy---Authorities were aggrieved of order passed by Appellate Tribunal, deleting amount of default surcharge---Validity---Question proposed by authorities did not arise from order passed by Read More... |
2017 PTD 2456 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
Murree Brewery Company Limited VS Province of Punjab through its Chief Secretary & others |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914---- Ss.31 & 32---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 151 & 199---Notification No.SO(E&M)/2-3/2011 dated 24.06.2015 issued by the Excise and Taxation Department, Government of the Punjab | Still head duty |
(“impugned notification”)---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---‘Still head duty’, levy of---Levy of ‘still head duty’ had been extended by the impugned notification to Pakistan Made Foreign Liquor and Beer consumed outside the Province of Read More... |
2017 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
Murree Brewery Company Limited VS Province of Punjab through its Chief Secretary & others |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914---Ss. 31 & 32--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 141 & 151---Notification No.SO(E&M)/2-3/2011 dated 24.06.2015 | Still head duty |
(“impugned notification”)---Freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse between different Provinces---Scope---‘Still head duty’ (excise duty), levy of ---By way of impugned notification ‘still head duty’ was extended to Pakistan Made Foreign Liquor and Read More... |
2017 PTD 283 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914 Ss. 3(6)(14) & 31 | Spirit liquor |
Constitution of Pakistan, Federal Legislative List, Entry 44---Ethanol (spirit). Imposition of duty---Vires---Petitioners were license-holders engaged in business of extracting ethanol, commonly known as spirit and they were aggrieved of imposition of duty by Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Terms used in statute |
Terms used in statute---Principle---Rule of construction teaches that meaning of particular terms in a statute may be ascertained by reference to words associated with them in the statute---Where two or more words of analogous meaning are employed together in a Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914 Ss. 3(6)(14) & 31 | Spirit/ Ethanol |
Punjab Liquor Import, Export, Transport and Possession Orders, Chapter 6, order 6.12(3)(f)---Ethanol (spirit), imposition of duty---Petitioners were license-holders engaged in business of extracting ethanol, commonly known as spirit and they were aggrieved of Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan Art. 25 | Equality |
Equality---Taxation---Imposition of tax/duty---Classification of persons---Scope---Legislature is competent to classify persons or properties into different categories subject to different rates of taxes---If same class of person is subjected to an incidence of Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914 Ss. 3(6)(14) & 31 | Ethanol Spirit |
Ethanol (spirit), imposition of duty---Subsequent stage---Petitioners were license-holders engaged in business of extracting ethanol, commonly known as spirit and they were aggrieved of imposing of duty by Provincial Government---Plea raised by petitioners was that Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Interpretation of statutes | Preamble of statute |
Preamble of statute---Scope and object---Pre-amble to an Act is an introductory statement that explains purpose and underlying philosophy of that Act---Object of preamble is to clarify meaning or purpose of operative part of the text in case of any ambiguity or Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Punjab Excise Act of 1914 Ss. 3(6)(14) & 31 | Estoppel |
Imposition of tax---Legislative power---Scope---Legislative cannot be estopped from issuing notification for the purpose of imposition of tax with a view to generate revenue keeping in view to generate revenue keeping in view its growing requirement to generate Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2017 |
M/S. COLONY SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH DEPUTY MANAGER VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB & 5 OTHERS |
Constitution of Pakistan--- Art. 199 Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 117 & 120 | Vires of statute |
Constitutional petition---Vires of statute---Presumption---Burden to prove---When vires of any statute are challenged, strong presumption as to legislative competence and validity of the statute is always attached---Burden is always on the person challenging vires Read More... |
2017 PTD 406 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2016 |
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF VS STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and another |
Insurance Ordinance (XXXIX of 2000) 118(2) | Insurance claim---Execution of decree |
Insurance claim---Execution of decree---Decretal amount, calculation of---Insurance Tribunal decreed claim directing Insurance company to pay group claims along with liquidated damages---Insurance company, pending appeal, deposited decretal amount as security for Read More... |
2016 PTD 1899 |
|
Board of Revenue, Punjab | 2015 |
Mst. SANA HUSNAIN
VS The STATE |
Pubjab Agricultural Income Tax Act (I of 1997) S. 4 Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Rules, 1997, Rr. 3(2)(ix) & 12 Agricultural Income Tax Rules, 2001, R.5 | Assessment of agricultural income tax |
Assessment of agricultural income tax---Failure to deposit amount of assessed amount before filing appeal---Claim of the petitioner was that notice issued by Assessing Authority to him for filing of income return of total agricultural income for financial years Read More... |
2015 PTD 2292 |
|
HIGH COURT (AJ&K) | 2015 |
HABIB BANK LIMITED through Attorneys VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 8 others |
Words and phrases; Taxation | Tax--- Fee--- Tax/fee |
----“Tax”---Meaning---Tax was an obligation imposed by an Authority for “public purpose”. ----“Fee”---Meaning---Fee was a payment of obligation imposed on the rule of “quid pro quo” which would postulate that the Authority had to render some Read More... |
2015 PTD 1757 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
HABIB SAFE DEPOSIT VAULT (PVT.) LTD. VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Ministry of Revenue and 2 others - |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (XII of 2011)--- S. 3 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), S.40(3) Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 | Sales Tax on services---Change of name |
Constitutional petition---Sales Tax on services---Change of name---Petitioner company was engaged in business of providing safe deposit locker services and was aggrieved of notice from authorities requiring to register itself and pay sales tax on its revenue income Read More... |
2015 PTD 1863 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
MESSRS PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (XII of 2011)--- ----S. 10--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | sales tax on service; Telecommunication |
Constitutional petition---Levy of sales tax on services---Telecommunication services---International incoming calls---Withdrawal of exemption---Show-cause notice, issuance of---Petitioner company was providing telecommunication services and had shown its inability Read More... |
2015 PTD 2072 |
|
Sindh High Court | 2015 |
MESSRS PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY AND OTHERS VS PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS |
Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (XII of 2011)--- ----S. 10--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199 | sales tax on service; Telecommunication services |
Constitutional petition---Levy of sales tax on services---Telecommunication services---Withdrawal of exemption---Alternate remedy---Factual controversy---Petitioner company was providing telecommunication services and assailed notification imposing sales tax on Read More... |
2015 PTD 2072 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. HYDERABAD VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX, HYDERABAD |
Central Excise Rules, 1944--- ----R.10 | Recovery of duty ---Limitation---Damaged stock |
Recovery of duty short-levied or erroneously refunded, etc.---Limitation---Damaged stock---Show-Cause Notice for recovery of duty---Contravention was related to production of 1996 which had been acknowledged by the department in their letter dated 9-2-2004---No Read More... |
2014 PTD 920 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. HYDERABAD VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX, HYDERABAD |
Central Excise Act (1 of 1944)--- ----S.33 | Power of adjudication---Limitation |
---Power of adjudication---Limitation---Show-Cause Notice was issued on 13-5-2004---On the date of order departmental official was mandated to finalize the assessment within 45 days of the issuance of Show-Cause Notice---No extension was granted which was clear from Read More... |
2014 PTD 920 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. HYDERABAD VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX, HYDERABAD |
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 254 | Failure to comply |
Failure to comply with requirement as to time does not render an act invalid---Limitation---Application of---Article 254 was only applicable to act or thing required to be done by the Constitution and does not apply to ordinary Read More... |
2014 PTD 920 |
|
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue | 2014 |
MESSRS ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. HYDERABAD VS COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX, HYDERABAD |
Central Excise Rules, 1944--- ----R.56 | Cement---Damaged stock---Laboratory report |
---Cement---Damaged stock---Laboratory report---Show-Cause Notice on the basis of incorrect laboratory report---Validity---Test report in respect of samples A & C had same Chemical constituents as sample B which the customs report mentioned that same might Read More... |
2014 PTD 920 |
|
Supreme Court of Pakistan | 2014 |
IQBAL ZAFAR JHAGRA AND SENATOR RUKHSANA ZUBERI VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others |
Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act (XL of 1997), S.21 Constitution of Pakistan--- ---- Art. 184(3) | Human rights case; Right to life; Exercise of jurisdiction |
Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act (XL of 1997), S.21---Human rights case---Exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution by the Supreme Court on new paper clippings regarding unprecedented load-shedding in Read More... |
2014 PTD 243 |
|
Lahore High Court | 2014 |
D.G. KHAN CEMENT COMPANY LTD., through Chief Financial Officer and another VS PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 3 others |
Excise Duty on Minerals (Labour Welfare) Act (VII of 1967)--- ----Ss. 3 & 10---Notifications S.R.O. 1168(X)/68, dated 10-7-1968, issued by Federal Government and SO(T) M&MD8-21/2011, dated 30-4-2013, issued by Punjab Government---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 143 & 199 | Delegation of power---“Cess” and “tax” |
Constitutional petition---Delegation of power---“Cess” and “tax”---Distinction---Petitioner assailed Notification SO(T) M&MD 8-21/2011, dated 30-4-2013, issued by Punjab Government, whereby an amendment was made in Schedule available in Excise Duty on Read More... |
2014 PTD 478 |