ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, JUSTICE:---This single judgment will also decide W.P.No.52443/2017, and W.P.No.52449/2017, as common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions. Through these constitutional writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the impugned letter dated 08.06.2017, issued by respondent No.2 (FBR).2. Brief facts are that petitioners are engaged in the business of manufacturing of steel products and also duly registered with the tax department. Respondent No.3 issued manufacturing bonded warehouse license (license) to the petitioners under section 13 and 95 the provisions of Customs Act, 1969 (Act), read with Rules 237 to 263 of the Customs Rules, 2001 (Rules). The claim of the petitioners is that under the Act and the Rules, only the Custom officials of Manufacturing Bond, Control Office (MBCO) are vested with the powers for verification, examination and assessment of the goods which are to be exported as per terms and conditions of the license. The griev...
PRESENT:
ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Hashim Aslam Butt, Advocate.
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Izhar ul Haq Sheikh, Advocate for respondent department. Hafiz Muhammad Azhar Ali, Advocate for respondent No. 5..
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 72
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Sections: 13,95,223
Law: 13,95,223
Sections: 223,237,238,239,240,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2018 PTD 378 | (2018) 117 TAX 326 | 2018 PTCL 25 | 2017 LHC 3978