MR. JUSTICE SHAHID JAMIL KHAN:---(1). During arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn our attention to paragraph No. 7 from Collector (Appeal)'s order wherein a finding of fact is given to the effect that generator in question was locally purchased and a receipt was produced before the respondent authorities. Conversely, the Customs Appellate Tribunal ("Appellate Tribunal") has given a finding of fact that they have admitted before respondent authorities that generator in question was imported and duties were not paid thereon. As a consequence, application was moved for payment of nominal duties and charges.2. Learned counsel for the respondents was confronted to show from the impugned order by Appellate Tribunal that findings given by Collector (Appeals) were discussed and were held as incorrect. He could not point out the same from the impugned order, however, submits that applicant was duty bound to produce complete record of the case with the reference application inc...
PRESENT:
MR., JUSTICE SHAHID, JAMIL KHAN AND MR., JUSTICE MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI.
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Mahmood Ahmed, Advocate..
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Izharul Haque, Advocate..
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Sections: 194B,196,196(6)
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2018 PTD 459 | (2017) 116 TAX 100 | 2017 PTCL 191