MR. OMAR ARSHAD HAKEEM, MEMBER (JUDICIAL):---(1). This judgment shall dispose of an appeal filed against Order-in-Appeal No.16/2013 dated 13.03.2013 passed by the learned Collector Customs, (Appeals) Lahore.2. Precise facts for deciding the core controversy involved in the instant appeal are that the appellant imported a consignment including padlocks of China origin and filed GD No. LPRN HC 531 dated 19.11.2012 through their clearing agent. The transaction value of impugned goods was rejected by the Appraising Staff and value of merchandise was enhanced on the basis of valuation ruling No. 429 dated 15.02.2012.3. Being aggrieved by the said order the appellant filed an appeal before the learned Collector of Customs (Appeals), Lahore who vide impugned order in appeal dismissed it and held that:-"I have examined the case record, submission of the appellant and the department, and found that in the said High Court's order had only directed for disposal of appeal and is silent about the a...
PRESENT:
MR. OMAR ARSHAD HAKEEM, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) & KHAWAJA UMAR MEHDI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Maqbool Ahmad, Advocate.
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Irfam Shaukat, Deputy Director..
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Sections: 25,25A,25A(4)
Law: Customs Rules, 2001
Sections: 107,107(a)
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2018 PTD 1300 | 2016 PTCL 726