JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE:---Fact of the case are that the respondent company imported three Tug boats for offloading oil tankers. In this behalf, two goods declarations were submitted on 21.2.2013, whereas one good declaration in respect of third Tug boat was submitted on 30.6.2014. It is contended that these Tug boats were imported on temporary basis for a period of three years, against corporate guarantees and were to be re-exported. The Collector Customs adjudication on 17.4.2015, issued a show cause notice, alleging therein that the respondent has violated the provisions of Section 32(3) and Section 79(1) of the Customs Act, 1969. The respondent replying the show cause notice denied the allegation and alleged that the Collector Customs has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter, consequently, the Collector Customs Adjudication, withdrawn, his notice and has held as under,"The matter has been examined in the light of SRO.371(I)/2002 dated 15.06.2002 which is categorical rega...
PRESENT:
JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE ZAHEER-UD-DIN KAKAR, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Iklaq Shah, Assistant Attorney General for Petitioner..
Respondent(s) by: Zafar Iqbal and Mazhar Ali Khan for Respondents..
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 3(2)
Law: Criminal Law (Third Amendment) Act, 2011
Sections: 19,32(3),79,179,196
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2019 PTD 110 | (2019) 119 TAX 409