MUHAMMAD JAWED ZAKARIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:--In this very case, the taxpayer moved an application before the learned CIR (A) for grant of stay which was rejected by the learned CIR (A) vide order dated 25.6.2018.2. On the date of hearing, Mr. Nadeem Iqbal, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the applicant/ taxpayer while none appeared on behalf of the Department.3. During the course of hearing, learned representative for the taxpayer apprised that the main appeal is still pending adjudication for hearing and writing judgment before the CIR(A). He submitted that hearing of the appeal was not taken up by the learned CIR (A) which is pending adjudication since 14.06.2018. The taxpayer moved an application for grant of stay on 25.6.2018 against which the taxpayer filed appeal as well as stay application during the summer vacations before the Tribunal. The stay application was dismissed vide order bearing MA. (Stay) No. 384/KB/2018 dated 6.7.2018 by the learned Single Bench with the following obse...
PRESENT:
MUHAMMAD, JAWED ZAKARIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SYED AYAZ MAHMOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Petitioner(s) by: Nadeem Iqbal, Advocate,.
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 48
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Sections: 128(1A),128(1AA),207
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2019 PTD 1201 | (2019) 119 TAX 21