Sindh High Court
2020
THLN 1004
2020 PTD 474
Laws Cited
Sales Tax Act, 1990 | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Sections
2(9),2(14)(a),2(37),3(1)(a),3(1)(b),6(1) ,6(2)(i),6(2)(ii),8(1)(a),8(1)(ca),8(1)( d),8A,21,22(1),23(1),25,26(1),73 | 498

KASHIF ANWAR AND OTHERS

VS

THE STATE

Petitioner(s) by: Iftikhar Hussain for Applicant.
Respondent(s) by: Syed Mohsin Imam for the State.
Present: FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
THIS ORDER PASSED BY:

FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE:---Since the applicants are involved in one and the same special criminal case; therefore, this single order is sufficient for disposal of both the aforementioned bail applications. The present applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered based on F.I.R. No. 678-DCI/STFE/Jinnah Impex/2011 lodged by Director General of Intelligence and Investigation FBR, Karachi for contravening Sections 2(37), 2(9), 2(14)(a), 3(1)(a)&(b), 6(1) & (2) (i) (ii), 8 (1)(a), (ca) & (d), 8A, 21, 22(1), 23(1), 25, 26(1) and 73 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 (hereinafter 'the said Act') which are punishable under sections 33(3), 5, 8, 11-c, 13, 16 and 18 of the said Act. Earlier, applicants remained fail to get the similar relief from the trial Court as their pre-emptive attempt was declined by the trial Court vide order dated 25.11.2017. Subsequently, applicants approached this Court by moving two different bail applications and succeeded in getting interim re...

2020 THLN 1004
Sindh High Court
(2020 PTD 474)

PRESENT:
FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE

KASHIF ANWAR AND OTHERS
VS
THE STATE

Petitioner(s) by: Iftikhar Hussain for Applicant..

Respondent(s) by: Syed Mohsin Imam for the State..

Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 2(9),2(14)(a),2(37),3(1)(a),3(1)(b),6(1) ,6(2)(i),6(2)(ii),8(1)(a),8(1)(ca),8(1)( d),8A,21,22(1),23(1),25,26(1),73

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Sections: 498

Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2020 PTD 474