MUHAMMAD JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE:-In all listed cases the moot question in common is that �Whether the subsidy granted by Federal Government to reimburse losses suffered by the tax-payer is a Capital Receipt or a Revenue Receipt�. Besides this, in some of the assessment years, though arguments have been made by the tax-payers Counsel on a subsidiary question; regarding jurisdiction of the Inspecting Additional Commissioner (�IAC�) to revise the original assessment order under Section 66-A of the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (�Ordinance�) however, the question(s) proposed do not clearly spell out such objection, and would require its proper rephrasing at the conclusion of this opinion.2. In this case assessment years involved are 1978-1979, 1979- 1980 1980-1981; wherein, the then Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, at Karachi, (�Tribunal�) vide its common Order dated 14.12.1985 was pleased to decide the controversy in favour of the taxpayer and against the department. The department b...
PRESENT:
BEFORE MUHAMMAD JUNAID GHAFFAR AND MS. SANA AKRAM MINHAS, JJ
Petitioner(s) by: Iqbal Salman Pasha.for Applicant (in I.T.R. No. 137 of 1994)..
Respondent(s) by: Faheem Ali Memon and Muhammad Taseer Khan for Respondent (in I.T.R. No. 137 of 1994)..
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Sections: 2(24)(b),62-A,66-A,136(1),136(2)
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2024 PTD 1446 2024 PTD 1448