Lahore High Court
2024
THLN 1028
2024 PTD 889 | (2024) 129 TAX 364 | 2024 PTCL 341 | 2024 LHC 463
Laws Cited
Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 | Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 | Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Sections
2(29),7E,7E(2)(d)(i),7E(2)(d)(ii),7E(2)( d)(iii),7E(2)(d)(iv),7E(2)(f),10,11,37,1 13 | 25,70,77,142,189,Fourth Schedule | 80C,80D

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE

VS

MUHAMMAD OSMAN GUL

Petitioner(s) by: M/s. Syed Moazzam Ali Shah, Abdul Muqtadar Khan, Ms. Asma Hamid, Shahzad Ahmad Cheema, Malik Abdullah Raza, Barrister Ahmed Pervaiz, Syed Ahmed Hasnain Rizvi, Rana Muhammad Akram, Hassan Ali, Ms. Sana Azhar, Mustafa Khalid, Ms. Samar Masood
Respondent(s) by:
Present: PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE SHAHID KARIM AND MR. JUSTICE RASAAL HASAN SYED AND
JUDGMENT:

SHAHID KARIM, JUSTICE:-This judgment will decide a cluster of Intra Court Appeals (Appendix-I) brought by the Income Tax Department / Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and (Appendix-II) brought by the private parties to challenge the judgment passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P No.52559 of 2022 and a large number of connected constitutional petitions which were decided by the same judgment (The Impugned Judgment). At the centre of controversy is the provisions of Section 7E in Chapter II (Section 7E) with the caption �charge of tax� in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (The 2001 Ordinance) which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2022. The petitioners before the learned Single Judge (respondents in these ICAs) contended that section 7E is ultra vires the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (The Constitution) and beyond the powers of the National Assembly to promulgate as an impost of tax. In conclusion, the learned Single Judge held that:27. For what has been d...