DR. ASIF MAHMOOD JAH, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN.----The above mentioned complaint was filed in terms of section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (FTO Ordinance) against a systemic failure of the department (Deptt). The Complainant has alleged that FBR's operational softwares have been allowed to supersede the dictates of law.2. As contents of the instant complaint are identical with C.NO. 668/ISB/2022, reflecting the same allegations, which were already referred to the Secretary, Revenue Division for comments, in terms of Section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance read with Section 9(1) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013. Federal Board Revenue was confronted on the following specific allegations contained in the instant complaint:i. "In terms of Section 9 of the Act read with Rules 19 to 22 of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006 [the Rules], sale tax invoice issued by the registered person can be modified because of cancellati...
PRESENT:
Dr. Asif Mahmood Jah, Federal Tax Ombudsman
Petitioner(s) by: uhammad Tanvir Akhtar, Advisor Dealing Officer. Rafaqat Ali Khan, CA Firm Authorized Representative..
Respondent(s) by: Zulfiqar Ali Gopang, Second Secretary IT Wing, FBR, Islamabad Departmental Representative.
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000
Sections: 2(3), 9 , 10
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 9
Law: Sales Tax Rules, 2006
Sections: 19, 20, 21, 22
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2025 PTD 244