The complainant has alleged mal-administration on the part of Customs Department by denying him the reward in accordance with the reward policy as communicated to General Public through advertisement published in daily "Pakistan". The complainant is an informer. Intelligence and Investigation Department seized a non-duty paid Toyota Land Cruiser on his information. He claimed a reward of Rs. 1,30,500. The Department had paid Rs. 39,160 to the complainant as reward.2. The Additional Director of Intelligence and Investigation (Customs and Excise) in his written reply to complaint submitted the, full share of reward had already been paid to the complainant i compliance of an earlier, decision of Wafaqi Mohtasib for the same relief.3. Heard both the parties. The reward rules have been notified vide S.R.O. 603(1)/73, dated 24-4-1973. The complainant ha given information on 17-9-1998. Rule 2 of Notification No. S.R.O 603(1)/73, as amended on 5-8-1998, describes scale of reward a under: ---"(...
PRESENT:
JUSTICE (RETD.) SALEEM AKHTAR, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Law: Reward Rules, 1973
Sections: 2,3
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2002 PTD 1488