MR. JUSTICE MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI:---.---(1). Through instant Reference Application under Section 47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 ("the Act of 1990") read with Section 133(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ("the Ordinance of 2001"), following questions of law, asserted to have arisen out of impugned order dated 20.08.2024, passed by learned Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Lahore Bench, Lahore, have been pressed and argued for our opinion:-(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue has tailed to pass a just, fair, proper, reasoned and speaking order, as required under Section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897? If so:i. Whether such a non-speaking order is not sustainable in the eye of law?(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue has erred in law and fact both, while travelling beyond the allegation voiced and raised in the show cause notice and in the sheer...
PRESENT:
MR. JUSTICE MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI AND MR. JUSTICE RASAAL HASAN SYED.
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Shahbaz Butt, Advocate..
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Shahid Sarwar Chahil, Advocate..
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Sections: 133(1),132
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 3,6,7,11,11(2),22, 23 & 26,33,34,46,47,47(5)
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Sections: 24A
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2025 PTD 746