This Customs Reference Application filed under Section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969 (the"Customs Act") seeks opinion of this Court on the following questions of law:i. Whether the learned Member Judicial of the Customs Appellate Tribunal has not wrongly interpreted the provision of Section 157, 181, SRO 499(I)/2009 dated 13.06.2009 and failed to consider the SRO 1619(I)/2024 dated 03.10.2024 while releasing the vehicle @ 40% redemption fine against the law/fact that vehicle was used exclusively and wholly for transportation of offending/smuggled goods and found carrying smuggled goods falling under clause (2) of Section 2 of the Customs Act, 1969?ii. Whether the learned Single Bench has acted without jurisdiction in passing the Impugned Order, in contravention of the mandatory provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 194A of the Customs Act, 1969, which expressly stipulates that every appeal involving determination of duty, tax, penalty, or fine exceeding five million rupees shall be h...
PRESENT:
KHALID ISHAQ, J.
Petitioner(s) by: M/s. Rana Muhammad Mehtab & Syed Majid Ali Bukhari, Advocates.
Respondent(s) by: Malik Saif Bhutta, Advocate.
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Sections: 196, 157, 181, 194A, 168, 2(s), 156(1), 157(1)(2), 168, 187, 179, 180
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2026 PTD 298