NASIM SIKANDAR, J.-This is a case stated by the Lahore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The following question of law has been framed for our consideration and reply:"Whether on facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the A.A.C. deleting the penalty imposed under section 91 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on the ground that assessment/demand in original has been modified in appeal."2. According to the statement of the case after framing assessment in respect of the assessee, an individual, the Assessing Officer proceeded to impose penalty of Rs.16,115 under section 91 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. On appeal penalty so imposed was deleted on the ground that assessment on the basis of which it was imposed was modified. The learned Tribunal maintained the findings by relying upon a judgment of this Court in re: CIT v. Begum Mumtaz Jamal PLD 1976 Lah. 761.3. In a recent opinion while disposing of C. T. R. No. 105 of 1993 re: C...
PRESENT:
NASIM SIKANDAR AND, JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, JJ
Petitioner(s) by: Muhammad Ilyas Khan for the Revenue..
Respondent(s) by: Nemo for Respondent..
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Sections: 91,91(4A),136
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2001 PTD 2207 | (2001) 84 TAX 519