KH. FAROOQ SAEED, J.-This judgment will dispose of P.T.R. No.12 of 2004, 13 of 2004, 14 of 2004, 15 of 2004 and 16 of 2004 as the common question of law is involved in these petitions.2. This P.T.R. has been filed by the Commissioner of Income/Wealth Tax, MTU, Lahore, by proposing following questions of law:(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned I.T.A.T. is justified to classify the acts, work and jobs carried out by the assessee under the contract as services.(ii) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the learned I.T.A.T. is justified to hold that the contractual receipts do not fall under the provision of section 80C of the repealed Ordinance.(iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned I.T.A.T. is justified in vacating the order under section 66-A of the repealed Ordinance passed by the I.A.C.3. The brief facts leading to the above questions of law are that the assessee National Cleaning Services is a registered con...
PRESENT:
NASIM SIKANDAR AND KH. FAROOQ SAEED, JJ
Petitioner(s) by: Khadim Hussain Zahid for Appellant..
Respondent(s) by: Siraj-ud-Din Khalid, Shahbaz Butt, Ijaz Ahmad Awan and M.M. Akram for Respondents.
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Sections: 50,50(4),80C
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2008 PTD 1243 | (2008) 98 TAX 46