JUDGMENT:-LORD REED: (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge agree)1. In our society, a great deal of intellectual effort is devoted to tax avoidance. The most sophisticated attempts of the Houdini taxpayer to escape from the manacles of tax (to borrow a phrase from the judgment of Templeman LJ in W T Ramsay Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1979] 1 WLR 974, 979) generally take the form described in Barclays Mercantile Business Finance Ltd v Mawson [2004] UKHL 51; [2005] 1 AC 684, para 34:"... structuring transactions in a form which will have the same or nearly the same economic effect as a taxable transaction but which it is hoped will fall outside the terms of the taxing statute. It is characteristic of these composite transactions that they will include elements which have been inserted without any business or commercial purpose but are intended to have the effect of removing the transaction from the scope of the charge."2. The present appeals are concerned wi...
PRESENT:
LORD NEUBERGER, PRESIDENT, LORD MANCE, LORD REED, LORD CARNWATH AND LORD HODGE
Petitioner(s) by: Paul Lasok QC, Richard Vallat and Anneliese Blackwood (Instructed by The General Counsel and Solicitor for HM Revenue and Customs).
Respondent(s) by: Kevin Prosser QC (Instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for Respondent (UBS AG). David Goy QC and Nicola Shaw QC (Instructed by Slaughter and May) for Respondent (DB Group Services (UK) Ltd)..
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2016 PTD 1921