MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, J.---
The petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
"This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
1. Declare that the Standing Order 9 dated 2-9-2002 and 5, dated 6-3-2002 issued by the respondent No.1 is in clear violation of sections 79, 205 and 29 and CGO 12 of 2002 is ab initio void, without jurisdiction and of no legal effect.
2. Declare that the letter dated 31-12-2002 issued by the Subordinate of the respondent No. 1 is incompetent and without lawful authority.
3. Declare that the act of respondents 1 and 2 in refusing the amendment and processing of the bill of entry dated 15-11-2002 in accordance with sections 79, 80 and 205 of the Customs Act, 1969 is illegal, mala fide, void, unjust, tainted with ulterior motive, without lawful authority and of no legal effect.
4. Direct the respondents to process bill of entry dated 15-11-2002 filed by the petitioner. and assess the goods according to the examination conducted by them on the request of the p...
PRESENT:
S. A. SARWANA, JUSTICE & MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Navin S. Merchant .
Respondent(s) by: Syed Tariq Ali, Standing Counsel assisted by Dr. Tariq Hudda, Additional Collector & Wazir H. Rizvi .
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Sections: 32, 79, 219 & 223
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2003 PTD 2090