The captioned appeals have been filed at the behest of assessee to assail two separate orders both dated 3-6-2002 relating to the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The common ground taken by assessee in both the years is that the learned C.I.T.(A) has not considered the amendment made in section 50(4) through Finance Act of 1998 in which proviso and explanations in section 50(4) was added as the A above amendment was effective from assessment year 1999-2000 while the tax has been charged under sections 52/86 for the years 1996-97 and 1997-98.2. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the assessee, a private limited company, derives income from textile. The assessee was under legal obligation to deduct tax under section 50(4) of the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 on payments made during the- years under consideration. Since the tax was not deducted under section 50(4) the Assessing Officer raised demands under sections 52/86 amounting to Rs.6,746,003 and Rs.2,97...
PRESENT:
EHSAN-UR-REHMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND NASEER AHMAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Petitioner(s) by: Khalid Maqbool, I.T.P. for Appellant..
Respondent(s) by: Muzammal Hussain, D.R. for Respondent.
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Sections: 52,50(4),86
Law: Finance Act, 1998
Sections: Preamble
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2006 PTD 984